TN5000 Thyroid Ultrasound Classifier
Fine-tuned SwinV2-Base for Benign vs Malignant Thyroid Nodule Classification
๐ Table of Contents
- Overview
- Model Architecture
- Dataset
- Training Methodology
- Results
- External Validation
- How to Use
- Limitations & Disclaimers
- Citation
Overview
This model classifies thyroid ultrasound images as benign or malignant, designed to assist in the early detection of thyroid cancer. It was fine-tuned from Microsoft's SwinV2-Base vision transformer on the TN5000 ROI dataset from Kaggle.
Key Design Decisions:
- Optimized for sensitivity (87.5%) to minimize missed malignancies โ critical in cancer screening
- AUC-ROC of 0.94 indicates excellent discriminative ability
- Focal loss with class weighting handles the benign/malignant class imbalance
- Early stopping prevents overfitting on the small medical dataset
Model Architecture
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Base Model | microsoft/swinv2-base-patch4-window8-256 |
| Architecture | Swin Transformer V2 |
| Parameters | 86.9M |
| Input Size | 256 ร 256 |
| Patch Size | 4 ร 4 |
| Window Size | 8 ร 8 |
| Number of Classes | 2 (benign, malignant) |
| License | Apache 2.0 |
Why SwinV2? Swin Transformers use hierarchical feature maps and shifted window attention, making them particularly effective for medical imaging where local texture patterns (echogenicity, microcalcifications, irregular margins) are diagnostically important. SwinV2 improves training stability with a cosine attention mechanism and larger model capacity.
Dataset
Primary Training Dataset: TN5000 ROI
- Source: Kaggle - ROI Dataset TN5000
- Type: Thyroid ultrasound Region-of-Interest (ROI) patches
- Total Images: 4,250
| Split | Images | Benign | Malignant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Train (80%) | 2,800 | ~1,600 | ~1,200 |
| Validation (20%) | 700 | ~400 | ~300 |
| Test (held-out) | 750 | ~400 | ~350 |
Class Distribution: The dataset is moderately imbalanced with more benign cases. We used balanced class weights (benign: 1.75, malignant: 0.70) and focal loss (ฮณ=2.0) to prioritize malignant case detection.
External Validation Dataset
- Source: Johnyquest7/thyroid-cancer-classification-ultrasound-dataset
- Images: 3,115 total (train + test splits)
- Purpose: Independent validation on unseen data from a different source
Training Methodology
Data Preprocessing
| Transform | Training | Validation/Test |
|---|---|---|
| Resize | RandomResizedCrop(256) | Resize(256) + CenterCrop(256) |
| Horizontal Flip | 50% probability | No |
| Rotation | ยฑ10ยฐ | No |
| Color Jitter | brightness=0.2, contrast=0.2 | No |
| Normalization | ImageNet mean/std | ImageNet mean/std |
Training Configuration
learning_rate: 2e-5
batch_size: 16 (per device)
gradient_accumulation_steps: 2
effective_batch_size: 32
epochs: 30 (early stopping patience: 5)
warmup_ratio: 0.1
optimizer: AdamW (ฮฒ1=0.9, ฮฒ2=0.999)
scheduler: Linear with warmup
mixed_precision: bf16
seed: 42
Loss Function: Focal Loss
Standard cross-entropy treats all misclassifications equally. In thyroid screening, missing a malignant case (false negative) is far more costly than a false alarm. We used focal loss:
FL(pt) = โ(1 โ pt)^ฮณ ยท log(pt)
With ฮณ=2.0, the model focuses learning on hard-to-classify malignant cases. Class weights further upweight the minority malignant class.
Model Selection Criterion
The best model was selected by validation AUC-ROC (not accuracy), ensuring optimal discrimination between benign and malignant cases across all thresholds.
Results
Validation Set (700 images)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | 87.9% |
| F1-Score | 91.3% |
| Sensitivity (Recall) | 88.8% |
| Specificity | 85.5% |
| PPV (Precision) | 93.9% |
| NPV | 75.3% |
| AUC-ROC | 0.940 |
Confusion Matrix:
Predicted
Benign Malignant
Actual Benign 171 29
Malignant 56 444
Test Set (750 images โ held out)
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | 87.2% |
| F1-Score | 90.8% |
| Sensitivity (Recall) | 87.5% |
| Specificity | 86.5% |
| PPV (Precision) | 94.4% |
| NPV | 72.6% |
| AUC-ROC | 0.937 |
Confusion Matrix:
Predicted
Benign Malignant
Actual Benign 180 28
Malignant 68 474
Training Curves
The model converged around epoch 18-22 with validation AUC-ROC peaking at 0.940. Early stopping triggered at epoch 27, loading the best checkpoint.
| Epoch | Train Loss | Val AUC-ROC | Val Sensitivity | Val Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.356 | 0.713 | 0.714 | 0.590 |
| 5 | 0.229 | 0.912 | 0.940 | 0.715 |
| 10 | 0.187 | 0.922 | 0.858 | 0.835 |
| 15 | 0.148 | 0.934 | 0.928 | 0.805 |
| 18 | 0.125 | 0.939 | 0.846 | 0.885 |
| 22 | 0.143 | 0.940 | 0.888 | 0.855 |
External Validation
To assess generalization, we tested the model on an independent dataset without any fine-tuning:
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | 66.8% |
| F1-Score | 44.7% |
| Sensitivity | 34.5% |
| Specificity | 87.4% |
| PPV | 63.5% |
| NPV | 67.7% |
| AUC-ROC | 0.707 |
Confusion Matrix (External):
Predicted
Benign Malignant
Actual Benign 1665 240
Malignant 793 417
Analysis: The external validation shows a significant performance drop (AUC 0.94 โ 0.71), which is expected due to:
- Domain shift: Different ultrasound machines, protocols, and image preprocessing
- Different ROI extraction: The external dataset may use different cropping strategies
- Population differences: Different patient demographics and disease prevalence
This highlights the importance of domain adaptation or fine-tuning on local data before clinical deployment.
How to Use
Quick Inference with Pipeline
from transformers import pipeline
from PIL import Image
# Load model
classifier = pipeline("image-classification", model="Johnyquest7/TN5000_model")
# Predict
image = Image.open("thyroid_ultrasound.png").convert("RGB")
results = classifier(image)
# Results format:
# [{'label': 'malignant', 'score': 0.944}, {'label': 'benign', 'score': 0.056}]
Manual Inference
import torch
from PIL import Image
from transformers import AutoImageProcessor, AutoModelForImageClassification
# Load model and processor
model = AutoModelForImageClassification.from_pretrained("Johnyquest7/TN5000_model")
processor = AutoImageProcessor.from_pretrained("Johnyquest7/TN5000_model")
# Preprocess
image = Image.open("thyroid_ultrasound.png").convert("RGB")
inputs = processor(image, return_tensors="pt")
# Predict
with torch.no_grad():
logits = model(**inputs).logits
probs = torch.softmax(logits, dim=-1)[0]
# Get probabilities
malignant_prob = probs[1].item()
benign_prob = probs[0].item()
print(f"Malignant: {malignant_prob:.1%}")
print(f"Benign: {benign_prob:.1%}")
Gradio Demo
Try the live demo: ๐ฉบ Thyroid Nodule Classifier Demo
Limitations & Disclaimers
โ ๏ธ CRITICAL: This model is for research and educational purposes only.
- Not FDA-approved for clinical use
- External validation showed performance degradation (AUC 0.71 vs 0.94) โ domain shift is a real concern
- Trained on ROI patches, not full ultrasound images โ the model expects pre-cropped nodule regions
- Class imbalance in training data may bias predictions
- No multi-institutional validation โ performance may vary across hospitals and equipment
- Always consult a radiologist or endocrinologist for diagnosis
Intended Use Cases:
- Research on AI-assisted thyroid screening
- Educational tool for medical students
- Prototype for integration into PACS systems (with proper validation)
Not Intended For:
- Direct patient diagnosis
- Replacing human radiologists
- Screening without supervision
Citation
If you use this model in your research, please cite:
@misc{tn5000_model,
title={TN5000 Thyroid Ultrasound Classifier},
author={Johnyquest7},
year={2026},
howpublished={\url{https://huggingface.co/Johnyquest7/TN5000_model}},
note={Fine-tuned SwinV2-Base for benign vs malignant thyroid nodule classification}
}
Base Model:
@article{liu2022swinv2,
title={Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution},
author={Liu, Ze and Hu, Han and Lin, Yutong and Yao, Zhuliang and Xie, Zhenda and Wei, Yixuan and Ning, Jia and Cao, Yue and Zhang, Zheng and Dong, Li and Wei, Furu and Guo, Baining},
journal={International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)},
year={2021}
}
Dataset:
- TN5000 ROI Dataset: Kaggle
Acknowledgments
- Model trained using Hugging Face Transformers and Datasets libraries
- Compute provided by Hugging Face GPU credits
- Base model: Microsoft SwinV2-Base
Generated by ML Intern โ an agent for machine learning research and development on the Hugging Face Hub.
- Downloads last month
- -
Model tree for Johnyquest7/TN5000_model
Base model
microsoft/swinv2-base-patch4-window8-256Evaluation results
- Accuracy on TN5000 ROI Datasetself-reported0.872
- F1 on TN5000 ROI Datasetself-reported0.908
- AUC-ROC on TN5000 ROI Datasetself-reported0.937
- Sensitivity on TN5000 ROI Datasetself-reported0.875
- Specificity on TN5000 ROI Datasetself-reported0.865