Mr-FineTuner's picture
Add model card with exact and within-1 confusion matrices and per-class metrics for non-fine-tuned LLaMA evaluation
ce683fa verified
# Non-Fine-Tuned LLaMA-3-8B CEFR Evaluation
This repository contains the evaluation results of the base `unsloth/llama-3-8b-instruct-bnb-4bit` model for CEFR-level sentence generation, without fine-tuning, as part of an ablation study. The model is evaluated using a fine-tuned classifier from `Mr-FineTuner/Skripsi_validator_best_model`.
- **Base Model**: unsloth/llama-3-8b-instruct-bnb-4bit
- **Evaluation Details**:
- Dataset: Rebalanced test dataset (`test_merged_output.txt`), which was also used to train and evaluate the classifier, potentially introducing bias.
- No fine-tuning performed; base model used directly.
- Classifier: MLP classifier trained on `train_merged_output.txt`, `dev_merged_output.txt`, and `test_merged_output.txt` for CEFR level prediction.
- **Evaluation Metrics (Exact Matches)**:
- CEFR Classifier Accuracy: 0.150
- Precision (Macro): 0.194
- Recall (Macro): 0.150
- F1-Score (Macro): 0.140
- **Evaluation Metrics (Within ±1 Level)**:
- CEFR Classifier Accuracy: 0.750
- Precision (Macro): 0.826
- Recall (Macro): 0.750
- F1-Score (Macro): 0.741
- **Other Metrics**:
- Perplexity: 86.022
- Diversity (Unique Sentences): 0.967
- Inference Time (ms): 4952.351
- Model Size (GB): 8.0
- Robustness (F1): 0.133
- **Confusion Matrix (Exact Matches)**:
- CSV: [confusion_matrix_exact.csv](confusion_matrix_exact.csv)
- Image: [confusion_matrix_exact.png](confusion_matrix_exact.png)
- **Confusion Matrix (Within ±1 Level)**:
- CSV: [confusion_matrix_within1.csv](confusion_matrix_within1.csv)
- Image: [confusion_matrix_within1.png](confusion_matrix_within1.png)
- **Per-Class Confusion Metrics (Exact Matches)**:
- A1: TP=0, FP=0, FN=10, TN=50
- A2: TP=1, FP=11, FN=9, TN=39
- B1: TP=3, FP=19, FN=7, TN=31
- B2: TP=2, FP=16, FN=8, TN=34
- C1: TP=2, FP=4, FN=8, TN=46
- C2: TP=1, FP=1, FN=9, TN=49
- **Per-Class Confusion Metrics (Within ±1 Level)**:
- A1: TP=4, FP=0, FN=6, TN=50
- A2: TP=8, FP=2, FN=2, TN=48
- B1: TP=10, FP=6, FN=0, TN=44
- B2: TP=8, FP=7, FN=2, TN=43
- C1: TP=10, FP=0, FN=0, TN=50
- C2: TP=5, FP=0, FN=5, TN=50
- **Note on Bias**:
- The test dataset used for evaluation (`test_merged_output.txt`) was part of the training and evaluation data for the classifier (`Mr-FineTuner/Skripsi_validator_best_model`). This may lead to inflated performance metrics due to the classifier's familiarity with the dataset. For a more robust evaluation, a new dataset not used in classifier training is recommended.
- **Usage**:
```python
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("unsloth/llama-3-8b-instruct-bnb-4bit")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("unsloth/llama-3-8b-instruct-bnb-4bit")
# Example inference
prompt = "[INST] Generate a CEFR B1 level sentence. [/INST]"
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt")
outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_length=50)
print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True))
```
Uploaded using `huggingface_hub`.