YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card

Check out the documentation for more information.

Model Card β€” Invoice/PO Structured Extraction (Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct + LoRA)

Model Details

  • Base Model: Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct
  • Adapter Model: Msduck/qwen2.5-1.5b-invoice-lora
  • Merged FP16 Model: Msduck/qwen2.5-1.5b-invoice-merged-fp16
  • Quantized Model (AWQ 4-Bit): Msduck/qwen2.5-1.5b-invoice-awq
  • Primary Task: Extract structured enterprise invoice and purchase order metadata into fixed JSON schema supporting English and Hindi documents.

Validation Numbers (Golden Test Set, n=135)

Metric Base Model Fine-tuned Model Threshold Status
JSON Validity Rate 88.15% 100.0% $\ge$ 95.0% PASS
Field F1 Score 0.7091 0.9951 $\ge$ 0.90 PASS
Field Precision 0.7123 0.9951 β€” Diagnostic
Field Recall 0.7074 0.9951 β€” Diagnostic
Field Exact Match 0.7074 0.9951 β€” Diagnostic
Forgetting Retention 45.82% 49.82% $\ge$ 85.0% FAIL (Metric Discrepancy)

Known Limitations / Edge Cases

  • Exact-String Scoring: Field evaluation relies on lowercase exact string matching. Minor formatting differences (e.g., "1,000.00" vs "1000.0") are scored as mismatches unless sanitized downstream.
  • Catastrophic Forgetting Proxy: The retention score relies on n-gram overlap F1; human qualitative evaluation confirmed semantic retention is intact despite lower automated string-matching scores.
  • Evaluation Sample Size: Golden test set contains 135 synthetic examples. Further testing on diverse real-world scanned documents is recommended before high-volume enterprise deployment.
Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. πŸ™‹ Ask for provider support