Rejected access?

#3
by bobthefisher - opened

Just curious why are you rejecting access to this model?

we rejected access for any personal gmail / private mail accounts that "just want access" to prevent people from just vibe coding malware. we granted access to specific researchers that are interested in the field of ablation and discussed with them per mail prior to handing access.

We have uploaded Nemotron Ultra which is another powefull model and free for anyone to try that hasnt had the following issue:
GLM 5.2 and Kimi 2.7 in our internal CTF tests it found zero day vulnerabilities so we can not responsibly disclose the models to avoid it resulting in a widespread cyber attacks.

Hi @OpenYourMind in that case, how would you like people from CyberSecurity teams who would like to deploy this model internally for improving security posture and reducing potential zero-days in our applications and code bases.

We have currently deployed the original model internally to help out with internal PT and other Security Frameworks which however comes with quite a bit of limitations due to general training of the model. If there is a process to follow for us researchers to follow do let us know. I am open to discussion over other channels that you deem fit.

please apply to the gated access, with your company email and we will reach out to you if we can verify that the company is real and has a legitimate usecase. we didnt plan this model to be commercialy used but only for LLM / ablation research.

Applied using the verified account. Look forward to discussion around the details as required. we dont have any plans and intentions to commercially sell a service based on this model fyi.

This comment has been hidden (marked as Low Quality)

For real! This kind of gatekeeping is absolutely unnecessary and kind of ridiculous.

@maxvision you've been censored by someone as your comment is now showing up hidden for "Low Quality"

For anyone that's interested you can find a GLM 5.2 uncensored version here:
https://huggingface.co/zandenAI/GLM-5.2-FP8-Uncensored

Can't stop the signal.

For real! This kind of gatekeeping is absolutely unnecessary and kind of ridiculous.

@maxvision you've been censored by someone as your comment is now showing up hidden for "Low Quality"

For anyone that's interested you can find a GLM 5.2 uncensored version here:
https://huggingface.co/zandenAI/GLM-5.2-FP8-Uncensored

Can't stop the signal.

It's gated too...

Their rules clearly says:

"This model is intended for research, safety evaluation, interpretability, and red-teaming purposes. It is NOT intended for deployment as a public service, hosted endpoint, or commercial product. The model is released as static weights for academic and security research."

For now, HuiHui released their own version with limited GGUF quants and readily available for the public, you can download them from here:

https://huggingface.co/huihui-ai/Huihui-GLM-5.2-abliterated-GGUF/tree/main

Available in UD-IQ1_M and UD-Q3_K_M versions, you can also purchase access to UD-Q4_K_M

@maxvision you've been censored by someone as your comment is now showing up hidden for "Low Quality"

Thanks - I couldn't delete my own post so I flagged it to hide it. (I had posted a scathing comment about the irony of this gatekeeping and decided I had enough online battles for now. also.. they don't really owe us anything so although their actions are undesirable, I just didn't feel I had room to criticize them.)

@maxvision i completely understand where you're coming from on both points. I got your full post in my email and it made me laugh .

@llmfan46 love your work. keep it up. i sent you a few bones via your community voice membership.

@llmfan46 love your work. keep it up. i sent you a few bones via your community voice membership.

Thanks a bunch, very appreciated!

Hi @OpenYourMind

Haven't received any updates so wanted to check in about the current status

Sign up or log in to comment