since the topic was closed without being solved: about the cp prompts

#72
by Faraleth - opened

I don't think that this will work. I mean. you send some fake screenshots and then you expect me to believe it when I don't even have time to reply? I was busy RL, so couldn't look into it further earlier. you got like 1hour to re-add in discord or the logs will end up here. in case you don't remember what I'm talking about: https://huggingface.co/Phr00t/LTX2-Rapid-Merges/discussions/48

UPDATE: This was a misunderstanding related to an accidental leak of an early investigation into a safeguarding project, which I've now been able to release @ https://huggingface.co/Phr00t/AIGen-Safeguard-Tool

It has been solved. You have been running on assumptions this entire time. You assume I am a pedo (I'm not). You assume I trained on CP (I shared my dataset). You assume I'm lying. You assume I even lied about donating to a child's charity that I sent you receipts for now. What is the point of talking with you more if you don't believe anything I say? I did it because I'm firmly against CP and I thought your heart was in the right place, but now you are just harassing me.

The logs? Keep in mind they were hidden text metadata unused in a note that was not intended to be shared, part of a completely unrelated video, which was promptly removed. You have been imposing your own context on them this whole time. If you are referring to our chat logs, I'm happy to summarize for transparency:

Here in the metadata note, which I've censored out the "child" part:

image

I've got nothing to hide. This was NOT used for generation. I was hoping to incorporate safeguards into the NSFW merge, as I explained. I was brainstorming ideas and my latest hope was training a LORA on bad "child" outputs (to merge into the NSFW merge), or incorporating a text encoder with bad "child" embeddings to ruin results (getting back to an "all in one"). The not so dirty secret is to investigate CP safeguards, you need CP prompts. There isn't anything really special about these, sure, they just needed "child" in there to hopefully trigger safeguards. You didn't believe any of it, so you came up with an idea of donating to a charity to put money where my mouth was. Sure, I'll do it for the charity. You want even more proof? Here is the PayPal receipt:

image

I gave up on the safeguarding idea, because people will just use other models and I'm tired of maintaining my stuff anyway, so I'm retiring from the overall NSFW scene.

Phr00t changed discussion status to closed
Phr00t locked this discussion

Sign up or log in to comment