Qaulity vs wan 2.2?

#91
by narrn001 - opened

Im interested the author said he stopped doing uodates for wan 2.2 because ltx 2 has much better quality.

But all the online comparisons says wan 2.2 is better in quality.

In my own testings, i could not get good motion quality without morphing etc with ltx 2.

Im curious to know how or why the ltx 2 is considered better by the author or any other use who thinks so? Thanks

ltx2 is better,it has more in esthetic than wan2.2,but wan2.2 is more stable,and have better prompt coherence

Honestly I went back to Wan 2.2. LTX2 has potential but its isn't quite there for me yet. This is my opinion, I'm sure others may have a different one. I struggled with I2V with ltx2 with it changing my image over the course of an 8 second video to not come close to the initial image. Morphing and oddly enough seems to age every character i use by 20 to 30 years. I say if you like ltx2 then use it. If you like wan 2.2 then use it.

Sign up or log in to comment