Instructions to use Raiff1982/codette-newton-star-r with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- PEFT
How to use Raiff1982/codette-newton-star-r with PEFT:
from peft import PeftModel from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM base_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Raiff1982/codette-llama-3.1-8b-merged") model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base_model, "Raiff1982/codette-newton-star-r") - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
newton-star-r β Complete STaR: keep-correct + rationalization (final result: 28.0%)
Fourth and final arm of a controlled STaR study β the first to implement the complete method from Zelikman et al.: 350 keep-correct chains (difficulty-matched MMLU-Pro STEM) plus 180 rationalized chains built from problems the model originally got wrong (correct answer supplied during generation, model derives the reasoning, hint stripped from the training example, anti-leak filter rejecting chains that cite being given the answer).
Result: 28.0% on GPQA-main (reason mode, n=100). Rationalization recovered the easy-arm regression (25.0% -> 28.0%) but did not exceed difficulty-matched keep-correct (also 28.0%) or the 34.0% untrained baseline. The widely-held assumption that rationalization closes the keep-correct gap did not hold here.
Two measured factors bound its contribution at 8B: ~9% of failures were unconstructible even with the correct answer given, and answer-scaffolded chains may encode the conclusion without the search a cold solve requires.
We publish this exactly as measured β a benchmark that can't be trusted to report failure can't be trusted to report success.
The STaR Study (GPQA-main, reason mode, n=100 per arm)
| Adapter | Training data | GPQA | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| newton (untrained baseline) | β | 34.0% | reproduced to the decimal, 4 days apart |
| newton-star | 500 easy-science keep-correct | 25.0% | regressed to chance |
| newton-star-hard | 350 MMLU-Pro STEM keep-correct | 28.0% | attenuated the harm, below baseline |
| newton-star-r | 350 keep-correct + 180 rationalized | 28.0% | complete method; recovered easy-arm damage, still below baseline |
Finding: neither half of STaR β keep-correct nor rationalization, nor both together β beat the untrained baseline at 8B scale. Rationalization recovered the easy-arm regression (25.0% -> 28.0%) but did not exceed keep-correct-hard or the 34.0% baseline. Self-taught reasoning consolidates existing ability rather than extending it. Full methodology, controls, and changelogs: Codette-Reasoning.
Created by Jonathan Harrison (Raiff1982) Β· Raiff's Bits LLC
- Downloads last month
- 105
Model tree for Raiff1982/codette-newton-star-r
Base model
meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B