File size: 9,922 Bytes
0ae3f18 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 | # FinEE v2.0 - Upgrade Roadmap
## From Extraction Engine to Intelligent Financial Agent
### Current vs Target Comparison
| Dimension | Current State | Target State | Priority |
|-----------|--------------|--------------|----------|
| **Base Model** | Phi-3 Mini (3.8B) | Llama 3.1 8B / Qwen2.5 7B | P0 |
| **Training Data** | 456 samples | 100K+ distilled samples | P0 |
| **Output Format** | Token extraction | Instruction-following JSON | P0 |
| **Context** | None | RAG + Knowledge Graph | P1 |
| **Interaction** | Single-turn | Multi-turn agent | P1 |
| **Input Types** | Email only | SMS + Email + PDF + Images | P1 |
| **Accuracy** | ~70% (estimated) | 95%+ (measured) | P0 |
---
## Phase 1: Foundation (Week 1-2)
### 1.1 Model Upgrade
- [ ] Download Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
- [ ] Download Qwen2.5 7B Instruct (backup)
- [ ] Benchmark both on finance extraction task
- [ ] Set up quantization pipeline (4-bit, 8-bit)
### 1.2 Training Data Expansion
- [ ] Generate 100K synthetic samples (DONE β
)
- [ ] Distill from GPT-4/Claude for complex cases
- [ ] Add real data from user (2,419 SMS samples β
)
- [ ] Create validation set (10K samples)
- [ ] Create test set (5K unseen samples)
### 1.3 Instruction Format
```json
{
"system": "You are a financial entity extractor...",
"instruction": "Extract entities from this message",
"input": "<bank SMS or email>",
"output": {
"amount": 2500.00,
"type": "debit",
"merchant": "Swiggy",
"category": "food",
"date": "2026-01-12",
"reference": "123456789012"
}
}
```
---
## Phase 2: Multi-Modal Support (Week 3-4)
### 2.1 Input Types
- [ ] SMS Parser (DONE β
)
- [ ] Email Parser (DONE β
)
- [ ] PDF Statement Parser
- Use `pdfplumber` for text extraction
- Table detection with `camelot`
- OCR fallback with `pytesseract`
- [ ] Image/Screenshot Parser
- OCR with `EasyOCR` or `PaddleOCR`
- Vision model for structured extraction
### 2.2 Bank Statement Processing
```
PDF Input β Text Extraction β Table Detection β
Row Parsing β Entity Extraction β Transaction List
```
### 2.3 Image Processing Pipeline
```
Image β OCR β Text Blocks β Layout Analysis β
Entity Extraction β Structured Output
```
---
## Phase 3: RAG + Knowledge Graph (Week 5-6)
### 3.1 Knowledge Base
- Merchant database (10K+ Indian merchants)
- Bank template patterns
- Category taxonomy
- UPI VPA mappings
### 3.2 RAG Architecture
```
Query β Retrieve Similar Transactions β
Augment Context β Generate Extraction
```
### 3.3 Knowledge Graph
```
[Merchant: Swiggy] --is_a--> [Category: Food Delivery]
--accepts--> [Payment: UPI, Card]
--typical_amount--> [Range: 100-2000]
```
### 3.4 Vector Store
- Use Qdrant/ChromaDB for transaction embeddings
- Enable semantic search for similar transactions
- Support for "transactions like this" queries
---
## Phase 4: Multi-Turn Agent (Week 7-8)
### 4.1 Agent Capabilities
```python
class FinancialAgent:
def extract_entities(self, message) -> dict
def categorize_spending(self, transactions) -> dict
def detect_anomalies(self, transactions) -> list
def generate_report(self, period) -> str
def answer_question(self, question, context) -> str
```
### 4.2 Conversation Flow
```
User: "How much did I spend on food last month?"
Agent: [Retrieves transactions] β [Filters by category] β
[Aggregates amounts] β "You spent βΉ12,450 on food"
User: "Compare with previous month"
Agent: [Uses conversation context] β [Retrieves both months] β
"December: βΉ12,450, November: βΉ9,800 (+27%)"
```
### 4.3 Tool Use
- Calculator for aggregations
- Date parser for time queries
- Budget tracker integration
- Export to CSV/Excel
---
## Phase 5: Production Deployment (Week 9-10)
### 5.1 Model Optimization
- [ ] GGUF quantization for llama.cpp
- [ ] ONNX export for faster inference
- [ ] vLLM for batch processing
- [ ] MLX optimization for Apple Silicon
### 5.2 API Design
```python
# FastAPI endpoints
POST /extract # Single message extraction
POST /extract/batch # Batch extraction
POST /parse/pdf # PDF statement parsing
POST /parse/image # Image OCR + extraction
POST /chat # Multi-turn agent
GET /analytics # Spending analytics
```
### 5.3 Deployment Options
- Docker container
- Hugging Face Spaces (demo)
- Modal/Replicate (serverless)
- Self-hosted with vLLM
---
## Technical Architecture
```
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β FinEE v2.0 Agent β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββββ β
β β SMS β β Email β β PDF β β Image β β
β β Parser β β Parser β β Parser β β OCR β β
β ββββββ¬ββββββ ββββββ¬ββββββ ββββββ¬ββββββ ββββββ¬ββββββ β
β β β β β β
β βββββββββββββββ΄βββββββ¬βββββββ΄ββββββββββββββ β
β βΌ β
β ββββββββββββββββββ β
β β Preprocessor β β
β ββββββββββ¬ββββββββ β
β βΌ β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β RAG Pipeline β β
β β βββββββββββ βββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββ β β
β β β Vector β β Knowledge β β Merchant β β β
β β β Store β β Graph β β Database β β β
β β ββββββ¬βββββ ββββββββ¬βββββββ βββββββββ¬βββββββ β β
β β βββββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββββββββββ β β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββΌββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β βΌ β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β Llama 3.1 8B / Qwen β β
β β Instruction-Tuned β β
β βββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββ β
β βΌ β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β JSON Output β β
β β + Confidence Score β β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
```
---
## Model Selection Analysis
| Model | Size | Speed | Quality | License | Choice |
|-------|------|-------|---------|---------|--------|
| Llama 3.1 8B | 8B | Fast | Excellent | Meta | β Primary |
| Qwen2.5 7B | 7B | Fast | Excellent | Apache | β Backup |
| Mistral 7B | 7B | Fast | Good | Apache | Alternative |
| Phi-3 Medium | 14B | Medium | Excellent | MIT | Future |
### Why Llama 3.1 8B?
1. **Instruction following** - Best in class for its size
2. **Structured output** - Reliable JSON generation
3. **Context length** - 128K tokens (future RAG)
4. **Quantization** - Excellent 4-bit performance
5. **Ecosystem** - Wide support (vLLM, llama.cpp, MLX)
---
## Training Strategy
### Stage 1: Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT)
```
Base: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Data: 100K synthetic + 2.4K real
Method: LoRA (rank=16, alpha=32)
Epochs: 3
```
### Stage 2: DPO (Direct Preference Optimization)
```
Create preference pairs:
- Chosen: Correct extraction with confidence
- Rejected: Partial/incorrect extraction
Objective: Improve extraction precision
```
### Stage 3: RLHF (Optional)
```
Reward model based on:
- JSON validity
- Field accuracy
- Merchant identification
- Category correctness
```
---
## Metrics & Benchmarks
### Extraction Accuracy
- **Amount**: Target 99%+
- **Type (debit/credit)**: Target 98%+
- **Merchant**: Target 90%+
- **Category**: Target 85%+
- **Reference**: Target 95%+
### System Metrics
- Latency: <100ms per extraction
- Throughput: >100 msgs/sec
- Memory: <8GB (quantized)
---
## Next Steps (Immediate)
1. [ ] Download Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2. [ ] Create instruction-format training data
3. [ ] Set up LoRA fine-tuning pipeline
4. [ ] Run first training experiment
5. [ ] Benchmark against current Phi-3 model
|