File size: 9,922 Bytes
0ae3f18
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
# FinEE v2.0 - Upgrade Roadmap
## From Extraction Engine to Intelligent Financial Agent

### Current vs Target Comparison

| Dimension | Current State | Target State | Priority |
|-----------|--------------|--------------|----------|
| **Base Model** | Phi-3 Mini (3.8B) | Llama 3.1 8B / Qwen2.5 7B | P0 |
| **Training Data** | 456 samples | 100K+ distilled samples | P0 |
| **Output Format** | Token extraction | Instruction-following JSON | P0 |
| **Context** | None | RAG + Knowledge Graph | P1 |
| **Interaction** | Single-turn | Multi-turn agent | P1 |
| **Input Types** | Email only | SMS + Email + PDF + Images | P1 |
| **Accuracy** | ~70% (estimated) | 95%+ (measured) | P0 |

---

## Phase 1: Foundation (Week 1-2)
### 1.1 Model Upgrade
- [ ] Download Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
- [ ] Download Qwen2.5 7B Instruct (backup)
- [ ] Benchmark both on finance extraction task
- [ ] Set up quantization pipeline (4-bit, 8-bit)

### 1.2 Training Data Expansion
- [ ] Generate 100K synthetic samples (DONE βœ…)
- [ ] Distill from GPT-4/Claude for complex cases
- [ ] Add real data from user (2,419 SMS samples βœ…)
- [ ] Create validation set (10K samples)
- [ ] Create test set (5K unseen samples)

### 1.3 Instruction Format
```json
{
  "system": "You are a financial entity extractor...",
  "instruction": "Extract entities from this message",
  "input": "<bank SMS or email>",
  "output": {
    "amount": 2500.00,
    "type": "debit",
    "merchant": "Swiggy",
    "category": "food",
    "date": "2026-01-12",
    "reference": "123456789012"
  }
}
```

---

## Phase 2: Multi-Modal Support (Week 3-4)
### 2.1 Input Types
- [ ] SMS Parser (DONE βœ…)
- [ ] Email Parser (DONE βœ…)
- [ ] PDF Statement Parser
  - Use `pdfplumber` for text extraction
  - Table detection with `camelot`
  - OCR fallback with `pytesseract`
- [ ] Image/Screenshot Parser
  - OCR with `EasyOCR` or `PaddleOCR`
  - Vision model for structured extraction

### 2.2 Bank Statement Processing
```
PDF Input β†’ Text Extraction β†’ Table Detection β†’ 
Row Parsing β†’ Entity Extraction β†’ Transaction List
```

### 2.3 Image Processing Pipeline
```
Image β†’ OCR β†’ Text Blocks β†’ Layout Analysis β†’ 
Entity Extraction β†’ Structured Output
```

---

## Phase 3: RAG + Knowledge Graph (Week 5-6)
### 3.1 Knowledge Base
- Merchant database (10K+ Indian merchants)
- Bank template patterns
- Category taxonomy
- UPI VPA mappings

### 3.2 RAG Architecture
```
Query β†’ Retrieve Similar Transactions β†’ 
Augment Context β†’ Generate Extraction
```

### 3.3 Knowledge Graph
```
[Merchant: Swiggy] --is_a--> [Category: Food Delivery]
                   --accepts--> [Payment: UPI, Card]
                   --typical_amount--> [Range: 100-2000]
```

### 3.4 Vector Store
- Use Qdrant/ChromaDB for transaction embeddings
- Enable semantic search for similar transactions
- Support for "transactions like this" queries

---

## Phase 4: Multi-Turn Agent (Week 7-8)
### 4.1 Agent Capabilities
```python
class FinancialAgent:
    def extract_entities(self, message) -> dict
    def categorize_spending(self, transactions) -> dict
    def detect_anomalies(self, transactions) -> list
    def generate_report(self, period) -> str
    def answer_question(self, question, context) -> str
```

### 4.2 Conversation Flow
```
User: "How much did I spend on food last month?"
Agent: [Retrieves transactions] β†’ [Filters by category] β†’ 
       [Aggregates amounts] β†’ "You spent β‚Ή12,450 on food"

User: "Compare with previous month"
Agent: [Uses conversation context] β†’ [Retrieves both months] β†’
       "December: β‚Ή12,450, November: β‚Ή9,800 (+27%)"
```

### 4.3 Tool Use
- Calculator for aggregations
- Date parser for time queries
- Budget tracker integration
- Export to CSV/Excel

---

## Phase 5: Production Deployment (Week 9-10)
### 5.1 Model Optimization
- [ ] GGUF quantization for llama.cpp
- [ ] ONNX export for faster inference
- [ ] vLLM for batch processing
- [ ] MLX optimization for Apple Silicon

### 5.2 API Design
```python
# FastAPI endpoints
POST /extract          # Single message extraction
POST /extract/batch    # Batch extraction
POST /parse/pdf        # PDF statement parsing
POST /parse/image      # Image OCR + extraction
POST /chat             # Multi-turn agent
GET  /analytics        # Spending analytics
```

### 5.3 Deployment Options
- Docker container
- Hugging Face Spaces (demo)
- Modal/Replicate (serverless)
- Self-hosted with vLLM

---

## Technical Architecture

```
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚                     FinEE v2.0 Agent                        β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”   β”‚
β”‚  β”‚   SMS    β”‚  β”‚  Email   β”‚  β”‚   PDF    β”‚  β”‚  Image   β”‚   β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  Parser  β”‚  β”‚  Parser  β”‚  β”‚  Parser  β”‚  β”‚   OCR    β”‚   β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜   β”‚
β”‚       β”‚             β”‚             β”‚             β”‚          β”‚
β”‚       β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜          β”‚
β”‚                            β–Ό                               β”‚
β”‚                   β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                       β”‚
β”‚                   β”‚  Preprocessor  β”‚                       β”‚
β”‚                   β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                       β”‚
β”‚                            β–Ό                               β”‚
β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”  β”‚
β”‚  β”‚                  RAG Pipeline                        β”‚  β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”   β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”   β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”  β”‚  β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  β”‚ Vector  β”‚   β”‚  Knowledge  β”‚   β”‚   Merchant   β”‚  β”‚  β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  β”‚  Store  β”‚   β”‚    Graph    β”‚   β”‚   Database   β”‚  β”‚  β”‚
β”‚  β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜   β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜   β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜  β”‚  β”‚
β”‚  β”‚       β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜          β”‚  β”‚
β”‚  β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜  β”‚
β”‚                          β–Ό                                β”‚
β”‚              β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                    β”‚
β”‚              β”‚  Llama 3.1 8B / Qwen  β”‚                    β”‚
β”‚              β”‚   Instruction-Tuned   β”‚                    β”‚
β”‚              β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                    β”‚
β”‚                          β–Ό                                β”‚
β”‚              β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”                    β”‚
β”‚              β”‚     JSON Output       β”‚                    β”‚
β”‚              β”‚   + Confidence Score  β”‚                    β”‚
β”‚              β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜                    β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
```

---

## Model Selection Analysis

| Model | Size | Speed | Quality | License | Choice |
|-------|------|-------|---------|---------|--------|
| Llama 3.1 8B | 8B | Fast | Excellent | Meta | ⭐ Primary |
| Qwen2.5 7B | 7B | Fast | Excellent | Apache | ⭐ Backup |
| Mistral 7B | 7B | Fast | Good | Apache | Alternative |
| Phi-3 Medium | 14B | Medium | Excellent | MIT | Future |

### Why Llama 3.1 8B?
1. **Instruction following** - Best in class for its size
2. **Structured output** - Reliable JSON generation
3. **Context length** - 128K tokens (future RAG)
4. **Quantization** - Excellent 4-bit performance
5. **Ecosystem** - Wide support (vLLM, llama.cpp, MLX)

---

## Training Strategy

### Stage 1: Supervised Fine-tuning (SFT)
```
Base: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Data: 100K synthetic + 2.4K real
Method: LoRA (rank=16, alpha=32)
Epochs: 3
```

### Stage 2: DPO (Direct Preference Optimization)
```
Create preference pairs:
- Chosen: Correct extraction with confidence
- Rejected: Partial/incorrect extraction
Objective: Improve extraction precision
```

### Stage 3: RLHF (Optional)
```
Reward model based on:
- JSON validity
- Field accuracy
- Merchant identification
- Category correctness
```

---

## Metrics & Benchmarks

### Extraction Accuracy
- **Amount**: Target 99%+
- **Type (debit/credit)**: Target 98%+
- **Merchant**: Target 90%+
- **Category**: Target 85%+
- **Reference**: Target 95%+

### System Metrics
- Latency: <100ms per extraction
- Throughput: >100 msgs/sec
- Memory: <8GB (quantized)

---

## Next Steps (Immediate)

1. [ ] Download Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2. [ ] Create instruction-format training data
3. [ ] Set up LoRA fine-tuning pipeline
4. [ ] Run first training experiment
5. [ ] Benchmark against current Phi-3 model