Rewritelikeme/Nietzsche

RewriteLikeMe-FriedrichNietzsche is a language model which has been trained to write like Nietzsche. It can turn any text into Nietzschean text. In the present case, the text was a small part of Beyond Good and Evil, which was used as training material; consequently, the model is experienced in the same style. It will probably give better results if one also gives it similar material to work on.

(translation: this will be better at rephrasing philosophically-related things)

Included here are:

• The LoRA files
• The merged model files
• The quantized merged model files (q8 GGUF) For usage with your preferred inference software.

Base model = Mistral 7b v0.2 Chat template == chatml I am pretty sure

---

I'm working on a product related to some of the tech on display here. I'd love it if you could help me test it and become an early customer! Do you want to train AIs like this one, but on your own style? RewriteLikeMe.com (which I am working on) does just that! RewriteLikeMe also makes running models like this for writing much easier, and you can clone styles other than your own. The whole thing is very early beta, so please contact and shout at me if/when something explodes and I'll fix it!

You can also run this model on there without needing to set it up yourself. Check the public voices after you've gone through onboarding!

---

Ideal sampling parameters:

temperature: 1.2,
top_p: 0.9,
min_p: 0.2

See model prompt (you really have to use this)

Put all this in the user message. The model is trained to rephrase text in the middle of a larger work without context, so even though it is single-turn, if the input is broken into chunks, you can rephrase texts of arbitrary length with this model.

You are an expert writing rephraser. Rephrase the TEXT TO TRANSFORM into something that possesses the same style AS IS DESCRIBED BY THE STYLE GUIDE. Do not change the content, just the style, of the text to transform. Sentence structure and some other things may be changed, even radically, so long as the meaning is not altered. Leave artifacts and seemingly cut-in-the-middle words at the start and end alone.

Note that <styleguide></styleguide> tags explain the target writing style. Analyze this reference to understand the specific tone, vocabulary, sentence structure, and stylistic nuances you should incorporate.

The style guide uses these headings with definitions to guide your rephrase:
- Structure (The Skeleton: How the Text is Built and Flows)
  Covers text architecture—bones and joints—for idea flow and engagement, including tempo/pacing, voice, emotion, formality, syntax/sentence variety, organization/flow.
- Lexicon (The Palette: Word Choices and Vocabulary)
  Involves word hue, texture, connotation for specificity, including diction, vocabulary range, repetition/variation, connotation/denotation.
- Rhythm and Sound (The Melody: Auditory Qualities)
  Sonic elements for memorability and cadence, including prosody, alliteration/assonance, meter/cadence, pause/silence.
- Rhetorical Devices (The Persuasion: Tools of Influence)
  Flourishes to argue, enchant, provoke; key for persuasion/art, including figurative language, emphasis, irony/contrast, directness vs. indirection.
- Tone and Mood (The Atmosphere: Emotional Resonance)
  Author's attitude (tone) and evoked feeling (mood) coloring the text, vital for emotion; includes attitudinal tone, evoked mood, humor/wit.
- Perspective and Narration (The Lens: Viewpoint and Focus)
  Positions reader/storyteller for subjectivity, including point of view, focalization, inclusivity.
- Imagery and Sensory Detail (The Texture: Vividness and Appeal)
  Sensory fabric for tangibility/evocation, including visual/sensory imagery, abstraction vs. concreteness.

Present your transformed text within <rephrase></rephrase> tags. Ensure that every piece of content from the original remains intact—only the stylistic presentation should change according to the style guide provided.

<styleguide>
**Structure**  
* Tempo/Pacing: Gradual exposition interlaced with rhetorical accelerations; longer, looping clauses coil around a central thesis, then snap into terse, punctuated fragments for emphasis.  
* Voice: Incisive, commanding, yet dialogic—addressing an imagined interlocutor with ironic courtesy. Shifts between impersonal deduction and sudden apostrophe create an effect of provocation rather than instruction.  
* Emotion: Restless, confrontational energy underlies the exposition. A cool analytic surface periodically cracks into scorn or sardonic amusement.  
* Level of Formality: Highly elevated diction and intricate syntax coexist with abrupt colloquial interjections, producing a tension between scholarly distance and intimate challenge.  
* Syntax and Sentence Variety: Dense hypotactic periods are counter-balanced by stark, elliptical statements. Parenthetical dashes and strategic commas act like surgical incisions.

**Lexicon**  
* Diction: Precision forged in abstraction—technical-philosophical terms set against metaphoric bursts that render concepts almost tactile.  
* Vocabulary Range: Swings from arcane philosophical coinages to compressed, vernacular thrusts, creating intellectual altitude and sudden, cheeky descents.  
* Repetition and Variation: Key conceptual phrases recur in altered contexts, functioning like leitmotifs that accrue new resonance each time.  
* Connotation and Denotation: Every abstract noun carries double weight—strict conceptual content shadowed by an ironic or combative aura.

**Rhythm and Sound**  
* Prosody: A staccato of emphatic beats embedded within rolling, almost orchestral sentences; silent pauses feel like breaths taken before the next provocation.  
* Alliteration and Assonance: Subtle, unobtrusive clusters that sharpen edges without sounding ornamental; consonantal punches accentuate key negations.  
* Meter and Cadence: Latent iambic surge beneath prose surfaces, collapsing into syncopated fragments when mockery erupts.  
* Pause and Silence: Long sentences stretch tension until snapped by curt rejoinders, creating rhetorical whiplash.

**Rhetorical Devices**  
* Figurative Language: Metaphors twist inside-out, becoming conceptual probes rather than decorative imagery.  
* Emphasis Techniques: Triple hypotheses, paradoxical concessions, and mock concessions amplify argumentative pressure.  
* Irony and Contrast: Irony drips from every apparent concession; savage juxtapositions between grandiloquence and curt dismissal.  
* Directness vs. Indirection: Often states a thesis only to veil it under layers of ironic questioning, forcing readers to excavate meaning.

**Tone and Mood**  
* Attitudinal Tone: Defiant, razor-edged, inviting yet taunting—never reassuring.  
* Evoked Mood: An unsettling blend of cerebral exhilaration and existential vertigo.  
* Humor and Wit: Dry, caustic flashes surface as sudden rhetorical winks.

**Perspective and Narration**  
* Point of View: Mobile—oscillates between detached, cosmic vantage and finger-jabbing second-person address.  
* Focalization: Alternates between panoramic theory and microscopic scrutiny of reader reactions.  
* Inclusivity: Alternately embraces and rebuffs the reader, mirroring an internal debate.

**Imagery and Sensory Detail**  
* Visual and Sensory Imagery: Rare, but when invoked, imagery is stark and almost surgical—lighting flashes that illuminate abstract terrain.  
* Abstraction vs. Concreteness: Relentlessly abstract yet made momentarily visceral through compressed, weaponized metaphors.
</styleguide>

<input>
{your AI-written text for rephrasing}
</input>

contact: evan@augmentoolkit.ai or hit me up on discord @Heralax