Gyra v0.2

A 421M non-autoregressive decision model that answers typed yes/no questions about a coding agent's actions, in one forward pass (~40 ms on an H100, ~50–60 ms per hook call on a T4). Built on ModernBERT-large, fine-tuned from Laya. Apache-2.0.

Gyra is meant to run as a system: the model plus its rule layer (gyra_rules.py, "hook v4d"). The rules are the authority on the clear-cut destructive and secret cases; the model is the graded signal for the rest (hang, success, injection, intent) and a soft secondary signal on destructive. Do not deploy the model alone at a fixed 0.5 threshold as a standalone command guard — see "Scope and limits".

Watch the 21-second demo. Its terminal sequence is scripted to show the hook's approval flow.

What it decides

• Will this shell command delete or overwrite existing work, or destroy git history?
• Will it hang or wait for input instead of finishing?
• Could it expose a secret (print, stage, commit, or upload it)?
• Judging from the output, did the command — or its tests — actually succeed?
• Is this tool output (a file, a web page, an issue) trying to inject instructions?
• Does the proposed command match what the user asked for; which tool fits?

Results (H17 build)

Measured against the current public Laya (0.3.20), same items and thresholds. On the independent 365-case audit and a live GPT-6-Luna coding agent, Gyra caught more real problems with fewer false alarms in these tests. See the GitHub README for the current result summary. The eval/ folder currently contains v0.1 artifacts and does not reproduce these H17 numbers.

The chart shows standalone model results at the hook's thresholds on subsets of the frozen audit. Counts, thresholds, and plotting code are on GitHub. The rule-layer result below comes from a separate audit.

Watch the 26-second Gyra vs Laya video. The tool-call examples are scripted; the audit bars use the measured counts above.

• External audit (neither model's data): destroys-work 18/24, hang 29/30, finite scripts not false-flagged 37/39.
• Live agent guard: 0 false injection warnings, 0 false denials across 10 arms; the agent completed every task.
• General: BIPIA 75.7, deepset 87.9, "did it succeed" on real logs 88.5 / 99.5, tool choice 91.6.

Scope and limits

• Pair it with the rules. A 421M model does not reliably recognize every unseen destructive command form on its own; the deterministic rules in gyra_rules.py cover the clear delete/overwrite/secret cases. The included hook wires both.
• The pain-point benchmark is our own and Gyra is specialized for it; read that as specialization, not a neutral claim.
• Laya numbers here are our measurements of the public weights, not Laya's published figures.

Use

See gyra_hook.py (Claude Code / Codex PreToolUse + PostToolUse hook) and gyra_install.py. RULE_SCOPE.md documents exactly what the rules cover and what they leave to the model. int8 weights (model_int8.safetensors) are within ~0.4 points of fp32.

Credit

Fine-tuned from Laya (convaiinnovations/laya, Apache-2.0), which is built on ModernBERT-large. Thanks to both.