license: apache-2.0
language:
- en
tags:
- prompt-routing
- complexity-classifier
- deberta-v3
- llm-router
- cost-optimization
datasets:
- RowRed/ComplexityRouter
- OpenAssistant/oasst2
base_model:
- microsoft/deberta-v3-base
ComplexityRouter: A Complexity based LLM Router
Introducing ComplexityRouter, a lightweight prompt complexity classifier finetuned from microsoft/deberta-v3-base. Using prompts from Open Assistant Conversations Dataset Release 2 (OASST2), some from myself, and some made more complex by Qwen3.5-4B (non-thinking mode), I created a synthetic dataset classifying 4,400 of the prompts using Qwen3.5-4B Non Thinking Mode.
It assigns prompts to one of 4 complexity levels, making it useful for routing queries to the appropriate LLM tier.
Model Details
Model Description
- Model type: Text Classification (multi‑class)
- Language: English
- Backbone: microsoft/deberta-v3-base
- License: Apache‑2.0
- Finetuned from model: microsoft/deberta-v3-base
- Training data: OASST2 + synthetic augmentations + manually created prompts
Labels generated by Qwen3.5‑4B (non‑thinking mode).
Model Sources
- Dataset repository: https://huggingface.co/datasets/RowRed/ComplexityRouter
Uses
Direct Use
Route prompts to appropriate LLM tiers based on predicted complexity:
| Level | Meaning | Suggested LLM Tier |
|---|---|---|
| 0 (Trivial) | Simple lookups, basic Q&A (e.g., “What is 2+2?”) | Fast/cheap local model |
| 1 (Simple) | Moderate reasoning, basic domain knowledge | Mid‑tier model |
| 2 (Moderate) | Complex reasoning, deep knowledge required | Strong model |
| 3 (Complex) | Very complex reasoning, niche expertise | Frontier API model |
Recommended routing strategy: Group levels 0 and 1 together (fast/cheap tier), level 2 as standard, level 3 as premium. The model achieves 93.0% adjacent accuracy on my test, meaning it rarely misroutes by more than one tier.
Out‑of‑Scope Use
- Multi‑turn conversation routing (single prompts only).
- Non‑English prompts (training data was English‑only).
- Prompts requiring image or multimodal understanding.
Bias, Risks, and Limitations
- Training data is synthetic and may not represent all real‑world prompt distributions.
- Level 1 (Simple) and Level 2 (Moderate) have lower per‑class F1 scores – boundary cases are inherently ambiguous.
- The model may struggle with very domain‑specific technical jargon.
- Performance may degrade on prompts that are very different from the training distribution.
Notice
This is my first attempt making a widespread finetune. There are probably lots of issues, but thought the idea was sound. I might make a second (hopefully better) version eventually, but am not sure where to get lots of high-quality open source data.
Training Details
Training Data
| Split | Samples | Source File | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training | 2,800 | TRAINING.jsonl | Used for model training |
| Validation | 600 | TRAINING.jsonl | Used for early stopping / hyperparameter tuning |
| Test (internal) | 600 | TRAINING.jsonl | Used for in‑distribution evaluation |
| Test (held‑out) | 400 | TEST.jsonl | Fully independent test set (reported results) |
Total unique prompts: 4,400
Class distribution (training): Level 0: 762 (27.2%) • Level 1: 674 (24.1%) • Level 2: 795 (28.4%) • Level 3: 569 (20.3%)
Training Procedure
- Hardware: NVIDIA T4 (16 GB VRAM, Google Colab)
- Framework: PyTorch 2.11 + Hugging Face Transformers
- Optimizer: AdamW (lr=2e-5, weight_decay=0.01)
- Scheduler: Linear warmup (10% of steps) → linear decay
- Loss: Weighted Cross‑Entropy (classification) + MSE (regression)
- Batch size: 16 (effective 32 with gradient accumulation)
- Epochs: 7 (early stopping patience = 3)
- Training time: ~18 minutes
- Class balancing: sqrt‑scaled class weights + weighted random sampler
Evaluation Results
Reported on 600 held‑out samples from TRAINING.jsonl (internal test).
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Exact Match Accuracy | 64.5% |
| Adjacent (±1) Accuracy | 93.0% |
| Macro F1 | 0.663 |
| Weighted F1 | 0.653 |
Per‑Class Performance (internal test, 600 samples)
| Level | Precision | Recall | F1 | Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L0 (Trivial) | 0.658 | 0.626 | 0.642 | 163 |
| L1 (Simple) | 0.457 | 0.628 | 0.529 | 145 |
| L2 (Moderate) | 0.683 | 0.571 | 0.622 | 170 |
| L3 (Complex) | 0.933 | 0.795 | 0.858 | 122 |
Confusion Matrix (internal test, 600 samples)
| Pred L0 | Pred L1 | Pred L2 | Pred L3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| True L0 | 102 | 46 | 13 | 2 |
| True L1 | 35 | 91 | 18 | 1 |
| True L2 | 15 | 54 | 97 | 4 |
| True L3 | 3 | 8 | 14 | 97 |
How to Get Started with the Model
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModel
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
class PromptComplexityRouter(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, backbone="microsoft/deberta-v3-base", num_labels=4):
super().__init__()
self.backbone = AutoModel.from_pretrained(backbone)
hidden_size = self.backbone.config.hidden_size
self.classifier = nn.Sequential(
nn.Dropout(0.1),
nn.Linear(hidden_size, 256),
nn.GELU(),
nn.Dropout(0.1),
nn.Linear(256, num_labels),
)
def forward(self, input_ids, attention_mask):
outputs = self.backbone(input_ids=input_ids, attention_mask=attention_mask)
cls_output = outputs.last_hidden_state[:, 0, :]
return self.classifier(cls_output)
# Load
device = torch.device("cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("RowRed/ComplexityRouter")
model = PromptComplexityRouter()
model.load_state_dict(
torch.load("pytorch_model.bin", map_location=device),
strict=False
)
model.to(device)
model.eval()
# Predict
prompts = ["What is 2+2?", "Explain quantum entanglement in detail."]
encoded = tokenizer(prompts, padding=True, truncation=True, return_tensors="pt").to(device)
with torch.no_grad():
logits = model(encoded["input_ids"], encoded["attention_mask"])
probs = torch.softmax(logits, dim=-1)
predictions = torch.argmax(probs, dim=-1)
for prompt, level in zip(prompts, predictions):
print(f"Level {level.item()}: {prompt}")
Citation
If you use this model, please cite:
@software{ComplexityRouter,
author = {RowRed},
title = {ComplexityRouter},
year = {2026},
url = {https://huggingface.co/RowRed/ComplexityRouter}
}
Additionally, acknowledge the base dataset and labeling model:
@dataset{oasst2,
author = {OpenAssistant Contributors},
title = {Open Assistant Conversations Dataset Release 2},
year = {2023},
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/OpenAssistant/oasst2}
}
@software{qwen3.5-4b,
author = {Qwen Team},
title = {Qwen3.5-4B},
year = {2026},
url = {https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B}
}
License
This model is released under Apache‑2.0. The backbone (microsoft/deberta-v3-base) is MIT‑licensed. The training dataset is derived from OASST2 (Apache‑2.0) and Qwen3.5‑4B outputs (Apache‑2.0).