RUNE XX WORKFLOWS vs nomadoor WORKFLOWS

#202
by Liquidmind111 - opened

Hello friend, how are you? I was experimenting with older workflows i used to use before using your workflows.

Many months ago, i was using nomadoor WF, and they looked kind of simple at the beginning. THen your WF had PREVIEWS and NEGATIVE PROMPTS even with distilled.

nomadoor do not use previews of animations and dont use the NAG nodes.

ANyways, i was just trying to REDO an old animation using nomadoor WF of image to video. THen the video was done in 14 minutes. WHen i tried using the same paramenters with YOUR WF, it took 24 minutes to render.

I was like, WHUT? WHY?

So, i decided to dive more into nomadoor NEW WF's, and saw he finally added WF for LTX 2.3, in which he uses 3 passes...... anyways, i have been playing for a whole day, and still he is not adapting the NAG prompt to use negative p rompts and still NO IMAGE previews at all until the video is finished.

BUT, an 8 second video will take 7 minutes with HIS workflow, and the same parameters and models and all, will take 14 minutes in your WF, lol.

DO you have any idea why is this time difference so much?

here is a sample of his WF. and a link to his WF.

im just curious....

www

https://comfyui.nomadoor.net/en/basic-workflows/ltx-2-3/

HERE ARE SOME RESULTS USING https://comfyui.nomadoor.net/en/basic-workflows/ltx-2-3/ VIDEO 1
and your workflow on VIDEO 2

My brother... your RuneXX video is 1088x1920.

Nomadoor's is 896x1664.

There's your time right there. πŸ˜†

My brother... your RuneXX video is 1088x1920.

Nomadoor's is 896x1664.

There's your time right there. πŸ˜†

ah yes, these videos have different resoolutions, you are right, but i tried also with same res and still rune xx takes longer, same resolution, just wondering if it is because of something else like the preview, NAG node, or the way is processed, but i was still experimenting afte this post, and at least, with input images i get way better result with RUNE XX WF, so, maybe noomador has less process and faster, but not that great quality.... not sure, thanks

will check, but its probably just either steps, sampler, sigma, resolution or fps ... ; -) His workflows are quite nice, think I even link to his at my ltx-2.0 repro. Doubt its anything wrong with them ; -)

I been playing around with 3 samplers, but with the dev model. Where it can be quite beneficial. Will try upload some 3-pass dev workflows soon

Sign up or log in to comment