Symio-ai/legal-deposition-analyzer
Model Description
Legal Deposition Analyzer processes deposition transcripts to extract: key admissions, contradictions, impeachment material, factual timelines, evidence of spoliation, and testimony that supports or undermines each cause of action element. It also identifies inconsistencies between depositions and other discovery materials.
Transforms raw transcript text into structured litigation intelligence.
Intended Use
- Primary: Analyze deposition transcripts for impeachment material and key admissions
- Secondary: Cross-reference testimony against document discovery for contradictions
- Integration: Discovery analysis tool in the GLACIER pipeline
Task Type
text-generation -- Structured extraction and analysis from deposition text
Base Model
meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct -- Long-context instruction-following for transcript analysis
Training Data
| Source | Records | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Deposition Transcripts | ~100K | Full deposition transcripts (anonymized) |
| Impeachment Examples | ~50K excerpts | Identified contradictions used at trial |
| Trial Cross-Examination | ~30K transcripts | Cross-examination using deposition testimony |
| Expert-Annotated Transcripts | ~10K | Attorney-annotated key passages |
| Document-Deposition Pairs | ~200K | Documents referenced in depositions |
Analysis Output Format
DEPOSITION ANALYSIS: [Deponent Name] - [Date]
KEY ADMISSIONS:
1. Page X, Lines Y-Z: "[quote]"
Supports: [which element of which cause of action]
Impeachment value: HIGH
CONTRADICTIONS:
1. Page X vs. Document [Exhibit #]:
Testimony: "[quote]"
Document says: "[quote]"
Impeachment strategy: [how to use at trial]
TIMELINE EXTRACTED:
[date]: [event] (page X, line Y)
ELEMENT SUPPORT MATRIX:
[For each COA element, which testimony supports/undermines]
CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT:
Evasive answers: [count and examples]
"I don't recall" responses: [count]
Contradicted by documents: [count]
RECOMMENDED FOLLOW-UP:
1. [Additional discovery needed based on testimony gaps]
Benchmark Criteria (90%+ Target)
| Metric | Target | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Key Admission Recall | >= 88% | Identify 88%+ of important admissions |
| Contradiction Detection | >= 85% | Find contradictions between testimony and documents |
| Timeline Accuracy | >= 92% | Extract correct dates and events |
| Element Mapping | >= 85% | Correctly map testimony to COA elements |
| Impeachment Utility | >= 80% | Identified material is actually useful for impeachment |
GLACIER Pipeline Integration
Post-discovery phase:
deposition-analyzer processes all transcripts
Output feeds into: element-mapper, timeline-builder, evidence-classifier
WDC panels use analysis for trial preparation strategy
Training Configuration
- LoRA fine-tuning (r=16, alpha=32)
- Epochs: 3
- Learning rate: 1e-4
- Max sequence length: 16384 (depositions are lengthy)
- Hardware: AWS SageMaker ml.g5.12xlarge
Limitations
- Deposition transcript quality varies (OCR errors in older transcripts)
- Cannot assess witness demeanor or credibility from text alone
- Video deposition analysis is not supported (text-only)
- Complex technical testimony may require domain-specific knowledge
- Does not generate deposition questions (that is a separate tool)
Version History
| Version | Date | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| v0.1 | 2026-04-10 | Initial model card, repo created |
Model tree for Symio-ai/legal-deposition-analyzer
Base model
meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B Finetuned
meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct