vae-vs-ddpm-celeba / README.md
UseItOrLoseIt's picture
Upload README.md
e06becc verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
4.34 kB
---
license: mit
library_name: pytorch
tags:
- pytorch
- vae
- variational-autoencoder
- ddpm
- diffusion
- diffusion-models
- image-generation
- celeba
- from-scratch
- computer-vision
datasets:
- jessicali9530/celeba-dataset
pipeline_tag: unconditional-image-generation
---
# VAE vs DDPM β€” CelebA (from scratch)
Pretrained checkpoints for a from-scratch PyTorch **Variational Autoencoder (VAE)** and **Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM)**, both trained on 64Γ—64 CelebA face crops as a head-to-head comparison of the two generative model families.
Both models are implemented from base `torch.nn` primitives only β€” no pretrained VAE, no `diffusers` library.
πŸ“Ž **Full training code, configs, and technical write-up:** [AhmedAbdAlkreem/vae-vs-ddpm-celeba](https://github.com/AhmedAbdAlkreem/vae-vs-ddpm-celeba)
---
## Files in this repository
| File | Size | Description |
|---|---|---|
| `vae_best.pt` | 34.7 MB | Best VAE checkpoint (v1.2) |
| `ddpm_best.pt` | 107 MB | Best DDPM checkpoint (v1.2) β€” U-Net with residual blocks + self-attention (8Γ—8, 16Γ—16) + sinusoidal time embedding |
Both checkpoints correspond to **v1.2** in the source repo's version history β€” the current best result after a documented sampler bug fix (v1.0 β†’ v1.1) and architectural refinements (v1.1 β†’ v1.2). See the [CHANGELOG](https://github.com/AhmedAbdAlkreem/vae-vs-ddpm-celeba/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) for the full iteration history.
---
## Results (v1.2)
| Model | FID ↓ | Inception Score ↑ | Reconstruction PSNR ↑ | Sampling cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAE | 97.06 | 2.00 Β± 0.06 | 22.47 dB | 1 forward pass |
| DDPM | **26.42** | 2.61 Β± 0.17 | n/a | 1000 forward passes (full DDPM) |
DDPM produces sharper, more photorealistic faces at a much higher sampling cost; the VAE is near-instant to sample but characteristically blurry β€” an architectural trait of pixel-wise reconstruction loss, not a training deficiency. Full quantitative and qualitative comparisons (sample grids, latent-space PCA, interpolations, denoising trajectory) are in the [GitHub README](https://github.com/AhmedAbdAlkreem/vae-vs-ddpm-celeba#quantitative-comparison).
---
## How to use these checkpoints
The model architectures are custom (defined in the source repo under `src/models/`), so these `.pt` files are raw `state_dict` weights, not a `transformers`/`diffusers`-compatible model. To load them:
```bash
git clone https://github.com/AhmedAbdAlkreem/vae-vs-ddpm-celeba
cd vae-vs-ddpm-celeba
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
```python
import torch
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
from src.models.vae import VAE
from src.models.unet import UNet # DDPM denoiser
# Download checkpoints from this Hub repo
vae_ckpt = hf_hub_download("UseItOrLoseIt/vae-vs-ddpm-celeba", "vae_best.pt")
ddpm_ckpt = hf_hub_download("UseItOrLoseIt/vae-vs-ddpm-celeba", "ddpm_best.pt")
vae = VAE()
vae.load_state_dict(torch.load(vae_ckpt, map_location="cpu"))
vae.eval()
unet = UNet()
unet.load_state_dict(torch.load(ddpm_ckpt, map_location="cpu"))
unet.eval()
```
For ready-made sampling and inference scripts (VAE reconstruction, DDPM full/DDIM sampling, latent interpolation), use `sample.py` and `inference.py` from the [source repo](https://github.com/AhmedAbdAlkreem/vae-vs-ddpm-celeba) directly β€” they handle config loading, device placement, and output saving for you.
---
## Training data
[CelebFaces Attributes (CelebA) Dataset](https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/jessicali9530/celeba-dataset), aligned/cropped to 64Γ—64. v1.2 was trained on a 40,000-image subset (VAE: 40 epochs, DDPM: 50 epochs).
## Limitations
- The VAE has not changed since v1.0 β€” a perceptual (VGG) loss is implemented in the source config but not yet enabled; this is the most likely lever for reducing VAE blur further.
- DDIM (fast, ~50-step) sampling is implemented but not yet benchmarked against the full 1000-step DDPM sampler.
- Training budget (40k images, tens of epochs) is modest relative to published DDPM results on full CelebA (~200k images, hundreds of epochs) β€” current FID/IS numbers should be read as credible for this budget, not as a ceiling on the architecture.
## License
MIT β€” see [LICENSE](https://github.com/AhmedAbdAlkreem/vae-vs-ddpm-celeba/blob/main/LICENSE) in the source repo.