internal probe results unclear to me

#1
by jpbwin - opened

hello,

on dnhkng's original work, he states that after the initial 32 question sweep, he runs a longer set of processes to find the best candidates.

did you do anything present in his suggested reproduction path after the initial sweep?

inferring from your model card:

Layers 33–36 was the only configuration in the layer-block sweep that achieved a perfect score on the causal reasoning subcategory while keeping the other reasoning categories at or above their baseline. This is what motivated picking it for the BFCL run below.

unless i'm mistaken, it seems you didn't do any of the beam search, etc. i'm curious why.

thanks for your time

Xpress AI org

You are right, we didn't do the beam search. We previously found the same layers work well for 3.5 so in the interest of time and getting it uploaded quickly we skipped a bunch of steps and ran it against the BFCL benchmark to see how it does in a more diverse set of tests. I just ran it now and updated the readme with the results, in general it seems to hold that these layers are good. Going to continue looking at some of the other combinations we rejected previously and if any are interesting we'll also upload them.

Sign up or log in to comment