alenphilip commited on
Commit
8c7f99d
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 6243562

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +104 -179
README.md CHANGED
@@ -130,209 +130,134 @@ def get_user_by_email(email):
130
 
131
  result = review_python_code(vulnerable_code)
132
  print(result)
 
133
 
134
-
135
- Training Details
136
- Training Data
137
  The model was trained on a comprehensive dataset of Python code review examples covering:
138
 
139
- 🔐 SECURITY
140
-
141
- SQL Injection Prevention
142
-
143
- XSS Prevention in Web Frameworks
144
-
145
- Authentication Bypass Vulnerabilities
146
-
147
- Insecure Deserialization
148
-
149
- Command Injection Prevention
150
-
151
- JWT Token Security
152
-
153
- Hardcoded Secrets Detection
154
-
155
- Input Validation & Sanitization
156
-
157
- Secure File Upload Handling
158
-
159
- Broken Access Control
160
-
161
- Password Hashing & Storage
162
-
163
- ⚡ PERFORMANCE
164
-
165
- Algorithm Complexity Optimization
166
-
167
- Database Query Optimization
168
-
169
- Memory Leak Detection
170
-
171
- I/O Bound Operations Optimization
172
-
173
- CPU Bound Operations Optimization
174
-
175
- Async/Await Performance
176
-
177
- Caching Strategies Implementation
178
-
179
- Loop Optimization Techniques
180
-
181
- Data Structure Selection
182
-
183
- Concurrent Execution Patterns
184
-
185
- 🐍 PYTHONIC CODE
186
-
187
- Type Hinting Implementation
188
-
189
- Mutable Default Arguments
190
-
191
- Context Manager Usage
192
-
193
- Decorator Best Practices
194
-
195
- List/Dict/Set Comprehensions
196
-
197
- Class Design Principles
198
-
199
- Dunder Method Implementation
200
-
201
- Property Decorator Usage
202
-
203
- Generator Expressions
204
-
205
- Class vs Static Methods
206
-
207
- Import Organization
208
-
209
- Exception Handling & Hierarchy
210
-
211
- EAFP vs LBYL Patterns
212
-
213
- Basic syntax validation
214
-
215
- Variable scope validation
216
-
217
- Type Operation Compatibility
218
-
219
- 🔧 PRODUCTION RELIABILITY
220
-
221
- Error Handling and Logging
222
-
223
- Training Procedure
224
- Training Hyperparameters
225
- Training regime: bf16 mixed precision with QLoRA
226
-
227
- Base Model: Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
228
-
229
- LoRA Rank: 32
230
-
231
- LoRA Alpha: 64
232
-
233
- LoRA Dropout: 0.1
234
-
235
- Learning Rate: 2e-4
236
-
237
- Batch Size: 16 (with gradient accumulation 4)
238
-
239
- Epochs: 2
240
-
241
- Max Sequence Length: 2048 tokens
242
-
243
- Optimizer: Paged AdamW 8-bit
244
-
245
- Speeds, Sizes, Times
246
- Base Model Size: 7B parameters
247
-
248
- Adapter Size: ~45MB
249
-
250
- Training Time: ~68 minutes for 400 steps
251
-
252
- Training Examples: 13,670 training, 1,726 evaluation
253
-
254
- Evaluation
255
- Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
256
  Testing Data
257
  Evaluation performed on held-out Python code examples from the same dataset distribution.
258
 
259
- Metrics
260
  ROUGE-L: 0.754
261
-
262
  BLEU: 61.99
263
-
264
  Validation Loss: 0.595
265
 
266
- Results
267
  The model achieved strong performance on code review tasks, particularly excelling at:
 
 
 
 
268
 
269
- Security vulnerability detection (SQL injection, XSS, etc.)
270
-
271
- Pythonic code improvements
272
-
273
- Performance optimization suggestions
274
-
275
- Providing corrected code examples
276
-
277
- Summary
278
  The model demonstrates excellent capability in identifying and fixing common Python code issues, with particular strength in security vulnerability detection and code quality improvements.
279
 
280
- Environmental Impact
281
  Carbon emissions can be estimated using the Machine Learning Impact calculator presented in Lacoste et al. (2019).
 
 
 
282
 
283
- Hardware Type: NVIDIA A100 or equivalent
284
-
285
- Hours used: ~1.5 hours
286
-
287
- Training Approach: QLoRA for efficient fine-tuning
288
 
289
- Technical Specifications
290
- Model Architecture and Objective
291
- Architecture: Transformer-based causal language model
292
 
293
- Objective: Supervised fine-tuning for code review tasks
 
 
294
 
295
- Context Window: 32K tokens (base model)
296
-
297
- Compute Infrastructure
298
- Hardware
299
- Training performed on GPU cluster with NVIDIA A100/A6000 class hardware
300
-
301
- Software
302
- Transformers, PEFT, TRL, BitsAndBytes
303
-
304
- QLoRA for parameter-efficient fine-tuning
305
-
306
- Citation
307
- BibTeX:
308
-
309
- bibtex
310
- @misc{code_review_assistant_2024,
311
- title={Code Review Assistant: A Fine-tuned Model for Python Code Analysis},
312
- author={Philip, Alen},
313
- year={2024},
314
- publisher={Hugging Face},
315
- howpublished={\url{https://huggingface.co/alenphilip/Code_Review_Assistant_Model}}
316
- }
317
- DOI:
318
-
319
- bibtex
320
  @misc{alen_philip_george_2025,
321
- author = {Alen Philip George},
322
- title = {Code_Review_Assistant_Model (Revision 233d438)},
323
- year = 2025,
324
- url = {https://huggingface.co/alenphilip/Code_Review_Assistant_Model},
325
- doi = {10.57967/hf/6836},
326
- publisher = {Hugging Face}
327
  }
328
- Model Card Authors
329
- Alen Philip
330
 
331
- Model Card Contact
332
  Hugging Face: alenphilip
333
-
334
  LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/alen-philip-george-130226254
335
-
336
  Email: alenphilipgeorge@gmail.com
337
 
338
 
 
130
 
131
  result = review_python_code(vulnerable_code)
132
  print(result)
133
+ ```
134
 
135
+ # Training Details
136
+ ## Training Data
 
137
  The model was trained on a comprehensive dataset of Python code review examples covering:
138
 
139
+ ### 🔐 SECURITY
140
+ - SQL Injection Prevention
141
+ - XSS Prevention in Web Frameworks
142
+ - Authentication Bypass Vulnerabilities
143
+ - Insecure Deserialization
144
+ - Command Injection Prevention
145
+ - JWT Token Security
146
+ - Hardcoded Secrets Detection
147
+ - Input Validation & Sanitization
148
+ - Secure File Upload Handling
149
+ - Broken Access Control
150
+ - Password Hashing & Storage
151
+
152
+ ### ⚡ PERFORMANCE
153
+ - Algorithm Complexity Optimization
154
+ - Database Query Optimization
155
+ - Memory Leak Detection
156
+ - I/O Bound Operations Optimization
157
+ - CPU Bound Operations Optimization
158
+ - Async/Await Performance
159
+ - Caching Strategies Implementation
160
+ - Loop Optimization Techniques
161
+ - Data Structure Selection
162
+ - Concurrent Execution Patterns
163
+
164
+ ### 🐍 PYTHONIC CODE
165
+
166
+ - Type Hinting Implementation
167
+ - Mutable Default Arguments
168
+ - Context Manager Usage
169
+ - Decorator Best Practices
170
+ - List/Dict/Set Comprehensions
171
+ - Class Design Principles
172
+ - Dunder Method Implementation
173
+ - Property Decorator Usage
174
+ - Generator Expressions
175
+ - Class vs Static Methods
176
+ - Import Organization
177
+ - Exception Handling & Hierarchy
178
+ - EAFP vs LBYL Patterns
179
+ - Basic syntax validation
180
+ - Variable scope validation
181
+ - Type Operation Compatibility
182
+
183
+ ### 🔧 PRODUCTION RELIABILITY
184
+
185
+ - Error Handling and Logging
186
+
187
+ ## Training Procedure
188
+ ### Training Hyperparameters
189
+ - Training regime: bf16 mixed precision with QLoRA
190
+ - Base Model: Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
191
+ - LoRA Rank: 32
192
+ - LoRA Alpha: 64
193
+ - LoRA Dropout: 0.1
194
+ - Learning Rate: 2e-4
195
+ - Batch Size: 16 (with gradient accumulation 4)
196
+ - Epochs: 2
197
+ - Max Sequence Length: 2048 tokens
198
+ - Optimizer: Paged AdamW 8-bit
199
+
200
+ ### Speeds, Sizes, Times
201
+ - Base Model Size: 7B parameters
202
+ - Adapter Size: ~45MB
203
+ - Training Time: ~68 minutes for 400 steps
204
+ - Training Examples: 13,670 training, 1,726 evaluation
205
+
206
+ ## Evaluation
207
+ ### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
208
  Testing Data
209
  Evaluation performed on held-out Python code examples from the same dataset distribution.
210
 
211
+ ### Metrics
212
  ROUGE-L: 0.754
 
213
  BLEU: 61.99
 
214
  Validation Loss: 0.595
215
 
216
+ ## Results
217
  The model achieved strong performance on code review tasks, particularly excelling at:
218
+ - Security vulnerability detection (SQL injection, XSS, etc.)
219
+ - Pythonic code improvements
220
+ - Performance optimization suggestions
221
+ - Providing corrected code examples
222
 
223
+ ## Summary
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
224
  The model demonstrates excellent capability in identifying and fixing common Python code issues, with particular strength in security vulnerability detection and code quality improvements.
225
 
226
+ ## Environmental Impact
227
  Carbon emissions can be estimated using the Machine Learning Impact calculator presented in Lacoste et al. (2019).
228
+ - Hardware Type: NVIDIA A100 or equivalent
229
+ - Hours used: ~1.5 hours
230
+ - Training Approach: QLoRA for efficient fine-tuning
231
 
232
+ ## Technical Specifications
233
+ ### Model Architecture and Objective
234
+ - **Architecture:** Transformer-based causal language model
235
+ - **Objective:** Supervised fine-tuning for code review tasks
236
+ - **Context Window:** 32K tokens (base model)
237
 
238
+ ### Compute Infrastructure
239
+ **Hardware**
240
+ - Training performed on GPU cluster with NVIDIA A100/A6000 class hardware
241
 
242
+ **Software**
243
+ - Transformers, PEFT, TRL, BitsAndBytes
244
+ - QLoRA for parameter-efficient fine-tuning
245
 
246
+ ## Citation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
247
  @misc{alen_philip_george_2025,
248
+ author = { Alen Philip George },
249
+ title = { Code_Review_Assistant_Model (Revision 233d438) },
250
+ year = 2025,
251
+ url = { https://huggingface.co/alenphilip/Code_Review_Assistant_Model },
252
+ doi = { 10.57967/hf/6836 },
253
+ publisher = { Hugging Face }
254
  }
255
+ ## Model Card Authors
256
+ - Alen Philip George
257
 
258
+ ## Model Card Contact
259
  Hugging Face: alenphilip
 
260
  LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/alen-philip-george-130226254
 
261
  Email: alenphilipgeorge@gmail.com
262
 
263