RC-SRP / output_mds /page_34.md
algorembrant's picture
Upload 89 files
a8ced59 verified

This exceeds the yield strain for Grade-60 steel ($\epsilon_y = 0.00207$, previously calculated), so the assumption that the tension steel is yielding is confirmed.

2. Compute the nominal moment strength, $M_n$. As in Example 4-1, use Eq. (4-21), which applies to sections with rectangular compression zones for

Mn=Asfy(dβˆ’a2)=4.0 in.2Γ—60 ksi(17.5 in.βˆ’5.88 in.2) M_n = A_s f_y \left(d - \frac{a}{2}\right) = 4.0 \text{ in.}^2 \times 60 \text{ ksi} \left(17.5 \text{ in.} - \frac{5.88 \text{ in.}}{2}\right) Mn=3490 k-in.=291 k-ft M_n = 3490 \text{ k-in.} = 291 \text{ k-ft}

3. Confirm that tension steel area exceeds $A_{s,\min}$. Although this is seldom a problem with most beam sections, it is good practice to make this check. The expression for $A_{s,\min}$ is given in Eq. (4-11) and includes a numerator that is to be taken equal to $3\sqrt{f_c'}$, but not less than 200 psi. As was shown in Example 4-1, the value of 200 psi governs for beams constructed with 4000 psi concrete. Thus,

As,min⁑=200 psifybwd=20060,000Γ—12 in.Γ—17.5 in.=0.70 in.2 A_{s,\min} = \frac{200 \text{ psi}}{f_y} b_w d = \frac{200}{60,000} \times 12 \text{ in.} \times 17.5 \text{ in.} = 0.70 \text{ in.}^2

Clearly, $A_s$ for this section satisfies the ACI Code requirement for minimum tension reinforcement.

4. Compute the strength reduction factor, $\phi$, and the resulting value of $\phi M_n$. As stated previously, for a single layer of tension reinforcement, $\epsilon_t$ is equal to $\epsilon_s$, which was calculated in step 1. Because $\epsilon_t$ is between 0.002 and 0.005, this is a transition-zone section. Thus, Eq. (4-28) is used to calculate $\phi$:

Ο•=0.65=0.65+(0.00459βˆ’0.002)2503=0.87 \phi = 0.65 = 0.65 + (0.00459 - 0.002)\frac{250}{3} = 0.87

Then,

Ο•Mn=0.87Γ—291 k-ft=253 k-ft \phi M_n = 0.87 \times 291 \text{ k-ft} = 253 \text{ k-ft}

Beam 2: Same as Beam 1, except that $f_c' = 6000$ psi. As shown in Fig. 4-12, changing the concrete compressive strength will not produce a large change in the nominal moment strength, but it does increase the ductility of the section. Thus, increasing the concrete compressive strength might change the beam section in Fig. 4-26 from a transition-zone section to a tension-controlled section.

1. Compute $a$, $c$, and $\epsilon_s$. Again, assume that the tension steel is yielding, so $f_s = f_y$. For this compressive strength, Eq. (4-14b) is used to determine that $\beta_1 = 0.75$. Then, using Eq. (4-16),

a=Ξ²1c=Asfy0.85fcβ€²b a = \beta_1 c = \frac{A_s f_y}{0.85 f_c' b} =4.00 in.2Γ—60 ksi0.85Γ—6 ksiΓ—12 in.=3.92 in. = \frac{4.00 \text{ in.}^2 \times 60 \text{ ksi}}{0.85 \times 6 \text{ ksi} \times 12 \text{ in.}} = 3.92 \text{ in.}

Thus, $c = a/\beta_1 = 5.23$ in., and using strain compatibility as expressed in Eq. (4-18), find

Ο΅s=(dβˆ’cc)Ο΅cu=(17.5βˆ’5.235.23)0.003=0.00704 \epsilon_s = \left(\frac{d - c}{c}\right) \epsilon_{cu} = \left(\frac{17.5 - 5.23}{5.23}\right) 0.003 = 0.00704

This exceeds the yield strain for Grade-60 steel ($\epsilon_y = 0.00207$), confirming the assumption that the tension steel is yielding.

2. Compute the nominal moment strength, $M_n$. As in Example 4-1, use Eq. (4-21), which applies to sections with rectangular compression zones:

Mn=Asfy(dβˆ’a2)=4.0 in.2Γ—60 ksi(17.5 in.βˆ’3.92 in.2) M_n = A_s f_y \left(d - \frac{a}{2}\right) = 4.0 \text{ in.}^2 \times 60 \text{ ksi} \left(17.5 \text{ in.} - \frac{3.92 \text{ in.}}{2}\right) Mn=3730 k-in.=311 k-ft (7% increase from Beam 1) M_n = 3730 \text{ k-in.} = 311 \text{ k-ft} \text{ (7\% increase from Beam 1)}