Auto-sync: 2026-06-29 02:18:16 (part 3)
Browse files- results/paper_analysis.md +1 -1
- results/paper_core_results.md +16 -14
- results/paper_story_memo.md +24 -14
- scripts/build_paper_analysis.py +32 -0
- scripts/build_paper_table_status.py +40 -0
results/paper_analysis.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
| 1 |
# Paper Analysis
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-
Generated: `2026-06-29T06:
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
## Main Seed Statistics
|
| 6 |
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
# Paper Analysis
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
+
Generated: `2026-06-29T06:15:24+00:00`
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
## Main Seed Statistics
|
| 6 |
|
results/paper_core_results.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ and the remaining clean-to-same-state proposal gap is `+21.74 pp`.
|
|
| 45 |
| K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-progress prior 0.05 | No | No | 35.13% | +5.39 pp | A stronger measured-progress prior over-selects nonzero residuals and drops below the plateau |
|
| 46 |
| K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-score prior 0.015/0.020 | No | No | 35.25% | +5.51 pp | Full train reward score, including terminal success, also replaces the typed prior without improving it |
|
| 47 |
| K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-score prior 0.025 | No | No | 35.19% | +5.45 pp | A stronger reward-score prior drops below the plateau |
|
|
|
|
| 48 |
| K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op prior + source-progress gate | No | No | 34.72-35.19% | +4.99-5.45 pp | Train-source progress viability is a near-tie/negative gate; soft threshold 0.25 is closest, while stricter thresholds over-abstain below the no-op plateau |
|
| 49 |
| K4 task-relative mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op prior 0.03 | No | No | 34.43% | +4.70 pp | Task-relative target/reference pose retrieval underperforms the raw-metric no-op plateau |
|
| 50 |
| K4 kernel-weighted residual consensus + no-op prior 0.03 | No | No | 35.13-35.19% | +5.39-5.45 pp | Distance-weighted tangent interpolation is plausible but does not beat equal mean-consensus no-op plateau |
|
|
@@ -87,19 +88,20 @@ Suggested main-table rows:
|
|
| 87 |
12. K4 train-state residual retrieval, mean-by-type tangent consensus
|
| 88 |
13. K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op prior plateau, canonical 0.03
|
| 89 |
14. K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-progress/source-score prior diagnostics
|
| 90 |
-
15.
|
| 91 |
-
16.
|
| 92 |
-
17. K4
|
| 93 |
-
18. K4
|
| 94 |
-
19. K4
|
| 95 |
-
20.
|
| 96 |
-
21.
|
| 97 |
-
22. Residual
|
| 98 |
-
23.
|
| 99 |
-
24. Lattice,
|
| 100 |
-
25. Lattice, no expert
|
| 101 |
-
26. Lattice,
|
| 102 |
-
27.
|
|
|
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
Suggested claim:
|
| 105 |
|
|
@@ -109,7 +111,7 @@ Suggested claim:
|
|
| 109 |
> progress/reward-score prior gives the strongest clean gain so far, while ungated KNN residual
|
| 110 |
> retrieval, field-gradient ascent, broader non-expert BC targets, field-teacher/tangent distillation, z-score/task-relative retrieval,
|
| 111 |
> train-family reliability priors, policy-relative anchoring, residual+Gaussian hybrids,
|
| 112 |
-
> source-progress viability gates, overly strong train-outcome priors, tangent consensus, kernel-weighted tangent interpolation, field-softmax tangent barycenters, tangent ray-search, wrong-gripper typed priors, and same-state policy-baseline fallback fail to improve the main rows.
|
| 113 |
> The large effect appears only when the field is queried on
|
| 114 |
> same-state intervention proposals, and the mechanism is isolated to local near-miss
|
| 115 |
> counterfactual geometry.
|
|
|
|
| 45 |
| K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-progress prior 0.05 | No | No | 35.13% | +5.39 pp | A stronger measured-progress prior over-selects nonzero residuals and drops below the plateau |
|
| 46 |
| K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-score prior 0.015/0.020 | No | No | 35.25% | +5.51 pp | Full train reward score, including terminal success, also replaces the typed prior without improving it |
|
| 47 |
| K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-score prior 0.025 | No | No | 35.19% | +5.45 pp | A stronger reward-score prior drops below the plateau |
|
| 48 |
+
| K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, no-op-only residuals | No | No | 35.19% | +5.45 pp | Removing wrong-gripper residuals loses one success versus the 35.25% safe-family plateau; the core gain is sparse no-op/tangent repair, with wrong-gripper acting only as a marginal helper |
|
| 49 |
| K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op prior + source-progress gate | No | No | 34.72-35.19% | +4.99-5.45 pp | Train-source progress viability is a near-tie/negative gate; soft threshold 0.25 is closest, while stricter thresholds over-abstain below the no-op plateau |
|
| 50 |
| K4 task-relative mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op prior 0.03 | No | No | 34.43% | +4.70 pp | Task-relative target/reference pose retrieval underperforms the raw-metric no-op plateau |
|
| 51 |
| K4 kernel-weighted residual consensus + no-op prior 0.03 | No | No | 35.13-35.19% | +5.39-5.45 pp | Distance-weighted tangent interpolation is plausible but does not beat equal mean-consensus no-op plateau |
|
|
|
|
| 88 |
12. K4 train-state residual retrieval, mean-by-type tangent consensus
|
| 89 |
13. K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op prior plateau, canonical 0.03
|
| 90 |
14. K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-progress/source-score prior diagnostics
|
| 91 |
+
15. K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op-only family diagnostic
|
| 92 |
+
16. Source-progress viability gate diagnostics
|
| 93 |
+
17. K2/K4 task-relative retrieval metric diagnostics
|
| 94 |
+
18. K4 kernel-weighted residual consensus + no-op prior diagnostics
|
| 95 |
+
19. K4 field-softmax residual barycenter + margin diagnostics
|
| 96 |
+
20. K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + wrong-gripper typed-prior diagnostics
|
| 97 |
+
21. K2 broad tangent ray-search
|
| 98 |
+
22. Residual-tangent distillation policy
|
| 99 |
+
23. Residual+Gaussian hybrid, K32 sigma0.35
|
| 100 |
+
24. Lattice, near-miss only
|
| 101 |
+
25. Lattice, no expert
|
| 102 |
+
26. Lattice, no expert + policy baseline candidate
|
| 103 |
+
27. Lattice, full
|
| 104 |
+
28. Oracle ceiling
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
Suggested claim:
|
| 107 |
|
|
|
|
| 111 |
> progress/reward-score prior gives the strongest clean gain so far, while ungated KNN residual
|
| 112 |
> retrieval, field-gradient ascent, broader non-expert BC targets, field-teacher/tangent distillation, z-score/task-relative retrieval,
|
| 113 |
> train-family reliability priors, policy-relative anchoring, residual+Gaussian hybrids,
|
| 114 |
+
> source-progress viability gates, no-op-only family masking, overly strong train-outcome priors, tangent consensus, kernel-weighted tangent interpolation, field-softmax tangent barycenters, tangent ray-search, wrong-gripper typed priors, and same-state policy-baseline fallback fail to improve the main rows.
|
| 115 |
> The large effect appears only when the field is queried on
|
| 116 |
> same-state intervention proposals, and the mechanism is isolated to local near-miss
|
| 117 |
> counterfactual geometry.
|
results/paper_story_memo.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ when queried on proposal geometry that matches those local counterfactuals.
|
|
| 33 |
| Tangent ray-search does not beat the typed-prior clean row | K1/K2 tight scale-grid ray search reach 34.84%; K2 broad reaches 34.96%; K4 tight reaches 34.55%, all below the no-op-prior row at 35.25% | Near-tie/negative diagnostic |
|
| 34 |
| Typed no-op residual prior improves the clean bridge | CPU smoke `14883591` passed; bonuses 0.025/0.03/0.035 tie at 35.25%, while 0.01/0.02/0.05/0.08 are slightly lower | Current best clean diagnostic |
|
| 35 |
| Wrong-gripper typed prior does not add a new clean bridge | wrong-gripper-only reaches 35.19%; no-op+wrong-gripper 0.02 ties 35.25%; no-op+wrong-gripper 0.04 drops to 35.13% | Negative/tie diagnostic |
|
|
|
|
| 36 |
| The proposal gap is now quantified | `paper_analysis.md` reports best clean +5.51 pp over canonical h16, same-state no-expert +27.25 pp, leaving a +21.74 pp clean-to-same-state gap | Core paper tension |
|
| 37 |
| Policy fallback is not the same-state mechanism | adding a policy baseline candidate to the no-expert same-state lattice drops 56.99% to 40.70% even with margin 0.00 | Negative diagnostic |
|
| 38 |
| Z-score retrieval metric does not help | z-score rows reach 32.23-32.81%, below raw retrieval | Negative diagnostic |
|
|
@@ -67,14 +68,15 @@ clean proposal result, the intended main rows are:
|
|
| 67 |
15. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus + typed no-op prior 0.025-0.035: 35.25%
|
| 68 |
16. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus + train-source progress prior: 35.25% at bonus 0.03; 35.13% at bonus 0.05
|
| 69 |
17. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus + train-source reward-score prior: 35.25% at bonuses 0.015/0.020; 35.19% at 0.025
|
| 70 |
-
18.
|
| 71 |
-
19.
|
| 72 |
-
20. K4
|
| 73 |
-
21.
|
| 74 |
-
22.
|
| 75 |
-
23.
|
| 76 |
-
24.
|
| 77 |
-
25.
|
|
|
|
| 78 |
26. Z-score residual retrieval: 32.23-32.81%
|
| 79 |
27. Task-relative residual retrieval metric: 34.26-34.43%
|
| 80 |
28. Train-family reliability prior: 33.28-33.33%
|
|
@@ -111,9 +113,9 @@ test-time search. The cleaner novelty is:
|
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
## Job Status
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 |
-
Last checked: `2026-06-29
|
| 115 |
-
completed after
|
| 116 |
-
include
|
| 117 |
|
| 118 |
- `14858328`-`14858333`: completed train-split `field_selected_noexpert_bc5`;
|
| 119 |
direct rollout is 26.84%, field-guided best is 27.65%.
|
|
@@ -253,6 +255,13 @@ include progress and reward-score train-outcome priors.
|
|
| 253 |
Bonuses `0.015` and `0.020` tie the current best at 35.25%; bonus `0.025`
|
| 254 |
reaches 35.19%. Summary jobs `14897126`/`14897127`/`14897128` and rebuild job
|
| 255 |
`14897129` completed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 256 |
- `14869627`: completed CPU Apptainer smoke for the new residual scale-grid
|
| 257 |
selector. It selected index `3` on a two-residual/two-scale toy case and
|
| 258 |
returned the expected action `0.20`, validating the candidate expansion and
|
|
@@ -277,9 +286,10 @@ include progress and reward-score train-outcome priors.
|
|
| 277 |
the current best clean deployment diagnostic, not as a SOTA claim. The
|
| 278 |
continuous train-source progress prior at bonus 0.03 ties this result without
|
| 279 |
a hand typed no-op prior; train-source reward-score priors at 0.015/0.020 also
|
| 280 |
-
tie it.
|
| 281 |
-
|
| 282 |
-
story.
|
|
|
|
| 283 |
- Use `results/paper_analysis.md` for paired seed deltas, per-task gaps, and
|
| 284 |
selection histograms when writing reviewer-facing tables.
|
| 285 |
- Treat z-score and task-relative retrieval metrics, source-progress viability gates,
|
|
|
|
| 33 |
| Tangent ray-search does not beat the typed-prior clean row | K1/K2 tight scale-grid ray search reach 34.84%; K2 broad reaches 34.96%; K4 tight reaches 34.55%, all below the no-op-prior row at 35.25% | Near-tie/negative diagnostic |
|
| 34 |
| Typed no-op residual prior improves the clean bridge | CPU smoke `14883591` passed; bonuses 0.025/0.03/0.035 tie at 35.25%, while 0.01/0.02/0.05/0.08 are slightly lower | Current best clean diagnostic |
|
| 35 |
| Wrong-gripper typed prior does not add a new clean bridge | wrong-gripper-only reaches 35.19%; no-op+wrong-gripper 0.02 ties 35.25%; no-op+wrong-gripper 0.04 drops to 35.13% | Negative/tie diagnostic |
|
| 36 |
+
| No-op-only residuals nearly preserve the clean bridge | excluding wrong-gripper residuals gives 35.19% with either no-op bonus 0.03 or source-score bonus 0.02, one success below the 35.25% safe-family plateau | Mechanism sharpened: wrong-gripper is marginal, not core |
|
| 37 |
| The proposal gap is now quantified | `paper_analysis.md` reports best clean +5.51 pp over canonical h16, same-state no-expert +27.25 pp, leaving a +21.74 pp clean-to-same-state gap | Core paper tension |
|
| 38 |
| Policy fallback is not the same-state mechanism | adding a policy baseline candidate to the no-expert same-state lattice drops 56.99% to 40.70% even with margin 0.00 | Negative diagnostic |
|
| 39 |
| Z-score retrieval metric does not help | z-score rows reach 32.23-32.81%, below raw retrieval | Negative diagnostic |
|
|
|
|
| 68 |
15. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus + typed no-op prior 0.025-0.035: 35.25%
|
| 69 |
16. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus + train-source progress prior: 35.25% at bonus 0.03; 35.13% at bonus 0.05
|
| 70 |
17. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus + train-source reward-score prior: 35.25% at bonuses 0.015/0.020; 35.19% at 0.025
|
| 71 |
+
18. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, no-op-only residuals: 35.19% with either no-op bonus 0.03 or source-score bonus 0.02
|
| 72 |
+
19. Source-progress viability gates: 35.19% / 34.96% / 34.72% for thresholds 0.25 / 0.50 / 0.75
|
| 73 |
+
20. K4 kernel-weighted tangent consensus / + no-op prior: 34.96% / 35.19%
|
| 74 |
+
21. K4 field-softmax tangent transport / best margin sweep: 34.96% / 35.19%
|
| 75 |
+
22. Wrong-gripper prior / no-op+wrong-gripper prior: 35.19% / 35.25%
|
| 76 |
+
23. K2 broad tangent ray-search: 34.96%
|
| 77 |
+
24. K1/K2 tight tangent ray-search: 34.84% / 34.84%
|
| 78 |
+
25. K4 tight tangent ray-search: 34.55%
|
| 79 |
+
26. Residual-tangent distillation policy: 28.87%
|
| 80 |
26. Z-score residual retrieval: 32.23-32.81%
|
| 81 |
27. Task-relative residual retrieval metric: 34.26-34.43%
|
| 82 |
28. Train-family reliability prior: 33.28-33.33%
|
|
|
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 |
## Job Status
|
| 115 |
|
| 116 |
+
Last checked: `2026-06-29 06:13 UTC`. The no-op-only residual-family ablation
|
| 117 |
+
completed after CPU smokes and GPU arrays, and the paper table/paired analysis
|
| 118 |
+
now include both full safe-family and no-op-only train-outcome prior rows.
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
- `14858328`-`14858333`: completed train-split `field_selected_noexpert_bc5`;
|
| 121 |
direct rollout is 26.84%, field-guided best is 27.65%.
|
|
|
|
| 255 |
Bonuses `0.015` and `0.020` tie the current best at 35.25%; bonus `0.025`
|
| 256 |
reaches 35.19%. Summary jobs `14897126`/`14897127`/`14897128` and rebuild job
|
| 257 |
`14897129` completed.
|
| 258 |
+
- `14897548`/`14897549`: completed no-op-only CPU rollout smokes after excluding
|
| 259 |
+
wrong-gripper residuals from the safe residual family.
|
| 260 |
+
- `14897563`/`14897564`: completed no-op-only GPU arrays. Both no-op bonus
|
| 261 |
+
`0.03` and source-score bonus `0.02` reach 35.19%, one success below the
|
| 262 |
+
35.25% safe-family plateau. Summary jobs `14897565`/`14897566` and rebuild
|
| 263 |
+
job `14897567` were submitted; local summary/analysis rebuilds were also run
|
| 264 |
+
while the CPU summary job was still pending.
|
| 265 |
- `14869627`: completed CPU Apptainer smoke for the new residual scale-grid
|
| 266 |
selector. It selected index `3` on a two-residual/two-scale toy case and
|
| 267 |
returned the expected action `0.20`, validating the candidate expansion and
|
|
|
|
| 286 |
the current best clean deployment diagnostic, not as a SOTA claim. The
|
| 287 |
continuous train-source progress prior at bonus 0.03 ties this result without
|
| 288 |
a hand typed no-op prior; train-source reward-score priors at 0.015/0.020 also
|
| 289 |
+
tie it. The no-op-only family ablation reaches 35.19%, so wrong-gripper
|
| 290 |
+
residuals are a marginal helper rather than the core mechanism. This is a
|
| 291 |
+
cleaner story hook but still not a higher SOTA number. The completed
|
| 292 |
+
K2/ray-search rows are near-ties that support the sparse-intervention story.
|
| 293 |
- Use `results/paper_analysis.md` for paired seed deltas, per-task gaps, and
|
| 294 |
selection histograms when writing reviewer-facing tables.
|
| 295 |
- Treat z-score and task-relative retrieval metrics, source-progress viability gates,
|
scripts/build_paper_analysis.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -163,6 +163,38 @@ METHODS = [
|
|
| 163 |
"k4s040_safe_margin0p20_mean_by_type_noopbonus0p03_srcprog0p25_summary.json"
|
| 164 |
),
|
| 165 |
),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 166 |
MethodSpec(
|
| 167 |
key="residual_k4_consensus_nooponly_noopbonus003",
|
| 168 |
label="K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, no-op-only residuals, no-op bonus 0.03",
|
|
|
|
| 163 |
"k4s040_safe_margin0p20_mean_by_type_noopbonus0p03_srcprog0p25_summary.json"
|
| 164 |
),
|
| 165 |
),
|
| 166 |
+
MethodSpec(
|
| 167 |
+
key="residual_k4_consensus_margin015_noopbonus003",
|
| 168 |
+
label="K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, margin 0.15, no-op bonus 0.03",
|
| 169 |
+
summary_path=(
|
| 170 |
+
"h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_"
|
| 171 |
+
"k4s040_safe_margin0p15_mean_by_type_noopbonus0p03_summary.json"
|
| 172 |
+
),
|
| 173 |
+
),
|
| 174 |
+
MethodSpec(
|
| 175 |
+
key="residual_k4_consensus_margin025_noopbonus003",
|
| 176 |
+
label="K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, margin 0.25, no-op bonus 0.03",
|
| 177 |
+
summary_path=(
|
| 178 |
+
"h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_"
|
| 179 |
+
"k4s040_safe_margin0p25_mean_by_type_noopbonus0p03_summary.json"
|
| 180 |
+
),
|
| 181 |
+
),
|
| 182 |
+
MethodSpec(
|
| 183 |
+
key="residual_k4_consensus_margin015_srcscorebonus002",
|
| 184 |
+
label="K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, margin 0.15, source-score bonus 0.02",
|
| 185 |
+
summary_path=(
|
| 186 |
+
"h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_"
|
| 187 |
+
"k4s040_safe_margin0p15_mean_by_type_srcscorebonus0p02_summary.json"
|
| 188 |
+
),
|
| 189 |
+
),
|
| 190 |
+
MethodSpec(
|
| 191 |
+
key="residual_k4_consensus_margin025_srcscorebonus002",
|
| 192 |
+
label="K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, margin 0.25, source-score bonus 0.02",
|
| 193 |
+
summary_path=(
|
| 194 |
+
"h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_"
|
| 195 |
+
"k4s040_safe_margin0p25_mean_by_type_srcscorebonus0p02_summary.json"
|
| 196 |
+
),
|
| 197 |
+
),
|
| 198 |
MethodSpec(
|
| 199 |
key="residual_k4_consensus_nooponly_noopbonus003",
|
| 200 |
label="K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, no-op-only residuals, no-op bonus 0.03",
|
scripts/build_paper_table_status.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -465,6 +465,46 @@ SPECS = [
|
|
| 465 |
story_role="soft train-source viability gate for sparse residual transport",
|
| 466 |
pending_job="14894438/14894439",
|
| 467 |
),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 468 |
ResultSpec(
|
| 469 |
key="retrieval_residual_k4_mean_nooponly_noopbonus003",
|
| 470 |
label="K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, scale 0.40, margin 0.20, no-op-only residuals, no-op bonus 0.03",
|
|
|
|
| 465 |
story_role="soft train-source viability gate for sparse residual transport",
|
| 466 |
pending_job="14894438/14894439",
|
| 467 |
),
|
| 468 |
+
ResultSpec(
|
| 469 |
+
key="retrieval_residual_k4_mean_margin015_noopbonus003",
|
| 470 |
+
label="K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, scale 0.40, margin 0.15, no-op bonus 0.03",
|
| 471 |
+
path="h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_k4s040_safe_margin0p15_mean_by_type_noopbonus0p03_summary.json",
|
| 472 |
+
clean_deployment="yes",
|
| 473 |
+
same_state_proposals="no",
|
| 474 |
+
expert_proposal="no",
|
| 475 |
+
story_role="advantage-abstention margin fine sweep for sparse residual transport",
|
| 476 |
+
pending_job="14897841/14897845",
|
| 477 |
+
),
|
| 478 |
+
ResultSpec(
|
| 479 |
+
key="retrieval_residual_k4_mean_margin025_noopbonus003",
|
| 480 |
+
label="K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, scale 0.40, margin 0.25, no-op bonus 0.03",
|
| 481 |
+
path="h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_k4s040_safe_margin0p25_mean_by_type_noopbonus0p03_summary.json",
|
| 482 |
+
clean_deployment="yes",
|
| 483 |
+
same_state_proposals="no",
|
| 484 |
+
expert_proposal="no",
|
| 485 |
+
story_role="advantage-abstention margin fine sweep for sparse residual transport",
|
| 486 |
+
pending_job="14897842/14897846",
|
| 487 |
+
),
|
| 488 |
+
ResultSpec(
|
| 489 |
+
key="retrieval_residual_k4_mean_margin015_srcscorebonus002",
|
| 490 |
+
label="K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, scale 0.40, margin 0.15, source-score bonus 0.02",
|
| 491 |
+
path="h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_k4s040_safe_margin0p15_mean_by_type_srcscorebonus0p02_summary.json",
|
| 492 |
+
clean_deployment="yes",
|
| 493 |
+
same_state_proposals="no",
|
| 494 |
+
expert_proposal="no",
|
| 495 |
+
story_role="advantage-abstention margin fine sweep with measured train-source prior",
|
| 496 |
+
pending_job="14897843/14897847",
|
| 497 |
+
),
|
| 498 |
+
ResultSpec(
|
| 499 |
+
key="retrieval_residual_k4_mean_margin025_srcscorebonus002",
|
| 500 |
+
label="K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, scale 0.40, margin 0.25, source-score bonus 0.02",
|
| 501 |
+
path="h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_k4s040_safe_margin0p25_mean_by_type_srcscorebonus0p02_summary.json",
|
| 502 |
+
clean_deployment="yes",
|
| 503 |
+
same_state_proposals="no",
|
| 504 |
+
expert_proposal="no",
|
| 505 |
+
story_role="advantage-abstention margin fine sweep with measured train-source prior",
|
| 506 |
+
pending_job="14897844/14897848",
|
| 507 |
+
),
|
| 508 |
ResultSpec(
|
| 509 |
key="retrieval_residual_k4_mean_nooponly_noopbonus003",
|
| 510 |
label="K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, scale 0.40, margin 0.20, no-op-only residuals, no-op bonus 0.03",
|