anhtld commited on
Commit
8804c3b
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 7780e0a

Auto-sync: 2026-06-29 02:18:16 (part 3)

Browse files
results/paper_analysis.md CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
  # Paper Analysis
2
 
3
- Generated: `2026-06-29T06:12:41+00:00`
4
 
5
  ## Main Seed Statistics
6
 
 
1
  # Paper Analysis
2
 
3
+ Generated: `2026-06-29T06:15:24+00:00`
4
 
5
  ## Main Seed Statistics
6
 
results/paper_core_results.md CHANGED
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ and the remaining clean-to-same-state proposal gap is `+21.74 pp`.
45
  | K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-progress prior 0.05 | No | No | 35.13% | +5.39 pp | A stronger measured-progress prior over-selects nonzero residuals and drops below the plateau |
46
  | K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-score prior 0.015/0.020 | No | No | 35.25% | +5.51 pp | Full train reward score, including terminal success, also replaces the typed prior without improving it |
47
  | K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-score prior 0.025 | No | No | 35.19% | +5.45 pp | A stronger reward-score prior drops below the plateau |
 
48
  | K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op prior + source-progress gate | No | No | 34.72-35.19% | +4.99-5.45 pp | Train-source progress viability is a near-tie/negative gate; soft threshold 0.25 is closest, while stricter thresholds over-abstain below the no-op plateau |
49
  | K4 task-relative mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op prior 0.03 | No | No | 34.43% | +4.70 pp | Task-relative target/reference pose retrieval underperforms the raw-metric no-op plateau |
50
  | K4 kernel-weighted residual consensus + no-op prior 0.03 | No | No | 35.13-35.19% | +5.39-5.45 pp | Distance-weighted tangent interpolation is plausible but does not beat equal mean-consensus no-op plateau |
@@ -87,19 +88,20 @@ Suggested main-table rows:
87
  12. K4 train-state residual retrieval, mean-by-type tangent consensus
88
  13. K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op prior plateau, canonical 0.03
89
  14. K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-progress/source-score prior diagnostics
90
- 15. Source-progress viability gate diagnostics
91
- 16. K2/K4 task-relative retrieval metric diagnostics
92
- 17. K4 kernel-weighted residual consensus + no-op prior diagnostics
93
- 18. K4 field-softmax residual barycenter + margin diagnostics
94
- 19. K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + wrong-gripper typed-prior diagnostics
95
- 20. K2 broad tangent ray-search
96
- 21. Residual-tangent distillation policy
97
- 22. Residual+Gaussian hybrid, K32 sigma0.35
98
- 23. Lattice, near-miss only
99
- 24. Lattice, no expert
100
- 25. Lattice, no expert + policy baseline candidate
101
- 26. Lattice, full
102
- 27. Oracle ceiling
 
103
 
104
  Suggested claim:
105
 
@@ -109,7 +111,7 @@ Suggested claim:
109
  > progress/reward-score prior gives the strongest clean gain so far, while ungated KNN residual
110
  > retrieval, field-gradient ascent, broader non-expert BC targets, field-teacher/tangent distillation, z-score/task-relative retrieval,
111
  > train-family reliability priors, policy-relative anchoring, residual+Gaussian hybrids,
112
- > source-progress viability gates, overly strong train-outcome priors, tangent consensus, kernel-weighted tangent interpolation, field-softmax tangent barycenters, tangent ray-search, wrong-gripper typed priors, and same-state policy-baseline fallback fail to improve the main rows.
113
  > The large effect appears only when the field is queried on
114
  > same-state intervention proposals, and the mechanism is isolated to local near-miss
115
  > counterfactual geometry.
 
45
  | K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-progress prior 0.05 | No | No | 35.13% | +5.39 pp | A stronger measured-progress prior over-selects nonzero residuals and drops below the plateau |
46
  | K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-score prior 0.015/0.020 | No | No | 35.25% | +5.51 pp | Full train reward score, including terminal success, also replaces the typed prior without improving it |
47
  | K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-score prior 0.025 | No | No | 35.19% | +5.45 pp | A stronger reward-score prior drops below the plateau |
48
+ | K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, no-op-only residuals | No | No | 35.19% | +5.45 pp | Removing wrong-gripper residuals loses one success versus the 35.25% safe-family plateau; the core gain is sparse no-op/tangent repair, with wrong-gripper acting only as a marginal helper |
49
  | K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op prior + source-progress gate | No | No | 34.72-35.19% | +4.99-5.45 pp | Train-source progress viability is a near-tie/negative gate; soft threshold 0.25 is closest, while stricter thresholds over-abstain below the no-op plateau |
50
  | K4 task-relative mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op prior 0.03 | No | No | 34.43% | +4.70 pp | Task-relative target/reference pose retrieval underperforms the raw-metric no-op plateau |
51
  | K4 kernel-weighted residual consensus + no-op prior 0.03 | No | No | 35.13-35.19% | +5.39-5.45 pp | Distance-weighted tangent interpolation is plausible but does not beat equal mean-consensus no-op plateau |
 
88
  12. K4 train-state residual retrieval, mean-by-type tangent consensus
89
  13. K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op prior plateau, canonical 0.03
90
  14. K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + source-progress/source-score prior diagnostics
91
+ 15. K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + no-op-only family diagnostic
92
+ 16. Source-progress viability gate diagnostics
93
+ 17. K2/K4 task-relative retrieval metric diagnostics
94
+ 18. K4 kernel-weighted residual consensus + no-op prior diagnostics
95
+ 19. K4 field-softmax residual barycenter + margin diagnostics
96
+ 20. K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval + wrong-gripper typed-prior diagnostics
97
+ 21. K2 broad tangent ray-search
98
+ 22. Residual-tangent distillation policy
99
+ 23. Residual+Gaussian hybrid, K32 sigma0.35
100
+ 24. Lattice, near-miss only
101
+ 25. Lattice, no expert
102
+ 26. Lattice, no expert + policy baseline candidate
103
+ 27. Lattice, full
104
+ 28. Oracle ceiling
105
 
106
  Suggested claim:
107
 
 
111
  > progress/reward-score prior gives the strongest clean gain so far, while ungated KNN residual
112
  > retrieval, field-gradient ascent, broader non-expert BC targets, field-teacher/tangent distillation, z-score/task-relative retrieval,
113
  > train-family reliability priors, policy-relative anchoring, residual+Gaussian hybrids,
114
+ > source-progress viability gates, no-op-only family masking, overly strong train-outcome priors, tangent consensus, kernel-weighted tangent interpolation, field-softmax tangent barycenters, tangent ray-search, wrong-gripper typed priors, and same-state policy-baseline fallback fail to improve the main rows.
115
  > The large effect appears only when the field is queried on
116
  > same-state intervention proposals, and the mechanism is isolated to local near-miss
117
  > counterfactual geometry.
results/paper_story_memo.md CHANGED
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ when queried on proposal geometry that matches those local counterfactuals.
33
  | Tangent ray-search does not beat the typed-prior clean row | K1/K2 tight scale-grid ray search reach 34.84%; K2 broad reaches 34.96%; K4 tight reaches 34.55%, all below the no-op-prior row at 35.25% | Near-tie/negative diagnostic |
34
  | Typed no-op residual prior improves the clean bridge | CPU smoke `14883591` passed; bonuses 0.025/0.03/0.035 tie at 35.25%, while 0.01/0.02/0.05/0.08 are slightly lower | Current best clean diagnostic |
35
  | Wrong-gripper typed prior does not add a new clean bridge | wrong-gripper-only reaches 35.19%; no-op+wrong-gripper 0.02 ties 35.25%; no-op+wrong-gripper 0.04 drops to 35.13% | Negative/tie diagnostic |
 
36
  | The proposal gap is now quantified | `paper_analysis.md` reports best clean +5.51 pp over canonical h16, same-state no-expert +27.25 pp, leaving a +21.74 pp clean-to-same-state gap | Core paper tension |
37
  | Policy fallback is not the same-state mechanism | adding a policy baseline candidate to the no-expert same-state lattice drops 56.99% to 40.70% even with margin 0.00 | Negative diagnostic |
38
  | Z-score retrieval metric does not help | z-score rows reach 32.23-32.81%, below raw retrieval | Negative diagnostic |
@@ -67,14 +68,15 @@ clean proposal result, the intended main rows are:
67
  15. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus + typed no-op prior 0.025-0.035: 35.25%
68
  16. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus + train-source progress prior: 35.25% at bonus 0.03; 35.13% at bonus 0.05
69
  17. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus + train-source reward-score prior: 35.25% at bonuses 0.015/0.020; 35.19% at 0.025
70
- 18. Source-progress viability gates: 35.19% / 34.96% / 34.72% for thresholds 0.25 / 0.50 / 0.75
71
- 19. K4 kernel-weighted tangent consensus / + no-op prior: 34.96% / 35.19%
72
- 20. K4 field-softmax tangent transport / best margin sweep: 34.96% / 35.19%
73
- 21. Wrong-gripper prior / no-op+wrong-gripper prior: 35.19% / 35.25%
74
- 22. K2 broad tangent ray-search: 34.96%
75
- 23. K1/K2 tight tangent ray-search: 34.84% / 34.84%
76
- 24. K4 tight tangent ray-search: 34.55%
77
- 25. Residual-tangent distillation policy: 28.87%
 
78
  26. Z-score residual retrieval: 32.23-32.81%
79
  27. Task-relative residual retrieval metric: 34.26-34.43%
80
  28. Train-family reliability prior: 33.28-33.33%
@@ -111,9 +113,9 @@ test-time search. The cleaner novelty is:
111
 
112
  ## Job Status
113
 
114
- Last checked: `2026-06-29 05:54 UTC`. The source-score bonus-prior batch
115
- completed after passing CPU/unit smokes, and the paper table/paired analysis now
116
- include progress and reward-score train-outcome priors.
117
 
118
  - `14858328`-`14858333`: completed train-split `field_selected_noexpert_bc5`;
119
  direct rollout is 26.84%, field-guided best is 27.65%.
@@ -253,6 +255,13 @@ include progress and reward-score train-outcome priors.
253
  Bonuses `0.015` and `0.020` tie the current best at 35.25%; bonus `0.025`
254
  reaches 35.19%. Summary jobs `14897126`/`14897127`/`14897128` and rebuild job
255
  `14897129` completed.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
256
  - `14869627`: completed CPU Apptainer smoke for the new residual scale-grid
257
  selector. It selected index `3` on a two-residual/two-scale toy case and
258
  returned the expected action `0.20`, validating the candidate expansion and
@@ -277,9 +286,10 @@ include progress and reward-score train-outcome priors.
277
  the current best clean deployment diagnostic, not as a SOTA claim. The
278
  continuous train-source progress prior at bonus 0.03 ties this result without
279
  a hand typed no-op prior; train-source reward-score priors at 0.015/0.020 also
280
- tie it. This is a cleaner story hook but still not a higher SOTA number. The
281
- completed K2/ray-search rows are near-ties that support the sparse-intervention
282
- story.
 
283
  - Use `results/paper_analysis.md` for paired seed deltas, per-task gaps, and
284
  selection histograms when writing reviewer-facing tables.
285
  - Treat z-score and task-relative retrieval metrics, source-progress viability gates,
 
33
  | Tangent ray-search does not beat the typed-prior clean row | K1/K2 tight scale-grid ray search reach 34.84%; K2 broad reaches 34.96%; K4 tight reaches 34.55%, all below the no-op-prior row at 35.25% | Near-tie/negative diagnostic |
34
  | Typed no-op residual prior improves the clean bridge | CPU smoke `14883591` passed; bonuses 0.025/0.03/0.035 tie at 35.25%, while 0.01/0.02/0.05/0.08 are slightly lower | Current best clean diagnostic |
35
  | Wrong-gripper typed prior does not add a new clean bridge | wrong-gripper-only reaches 35.19%; no-op+wrong-gripper 0.02 ties 35.25%; no-op+wrong-gripper 0.04 drops to 35.13% | Negative/tie diagnostic |
36
+ | No-op-only residuals nearly preserve the clean bridge | excluding wrong-gripper residuals gives 35.19% with either no-op bonus 0.03 or source-score bonus 0.02, one success below the 35.25% safe-family plateau | Mechanism sharpened: wrong-gripper is marginal, not core |
37
  | The proposal gap is now quantified | `paper_analysis.md` reports best clean +5.51 pp over canonical h16, same-state no-expert +27.25 pp, leaving a +21.74 pp clean-to-same-state gap | Core paper tension |
38
  | Policy fallback is not the same-state mechanism | adding a policy baseline candidate to the no-expert same-state lattice drops 56.99% to 40.70% even with margin 0.00 | Negative diagnostic |
39
  | Z-score retrieval metric does not help | z-score rows reach 32.23-32.81%, below raw retrieval | Negative diagnostic |
 
68
  15. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus + typed no-op prior 0.025-0.035: 35.25%
69
  16. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus + train-source progress prior: 35.25% at bonus 0.03; 35.13% at bonus 0.05
70
  17. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus + train-source reward-score prior: 35.25% at bonuses 0.015/0.020; 35.19% at 0.025
71
+ 18. K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, no-op-only residuals: 35.19% with either no-op bonus 0.03 or source-score bonus 0.02
72
+ 19. Source-progress viability gates: 35.19% / 34.96% / 34.72% for thresholds 0.25 / 0.50 / 0.75
73
+ 20. K4 kernel-weighted tangent consensus / + no-op prior: 34.96% / 35.19%
74
+ 21. K4 field-softmax tangent transport / best margin sweep: 34.96% / 35.19%
75
+ 22. Wrong-gripper prior / no-op+wrong-gripper prior: 35.19% / 35.25%
76
+ 23. K2 broad tangent ray-search: 34.96%
77
+ 24. K1/K2 tight tangent ray-search: 34.84% / 34.84%
78
+ 25. K4 tight tangent ray-search: 34.55%
79
+ 26. Residual-tangent distillation policy: 28.87%
80
  26. Z-score residual retrieval: 32.23-32.81%
81
  27. Task-relative residual retrieval metric: 34.26-34.43%
82
  28. Train-family reliability prior: 33.28-33.33%
 
113
 
114
  ## Job Status
115
 
116
+ Last checked: `2026-06-29 06:13 UTC`. The no-op-only residual-family ablation
117
+ completed after CPU smokes and GPU arrays, and the paper table/paired analysis
118
+ now include both full safe-family and no-op-only train-outcome prior rows.
119
 
120
  - `14858328`-`14858333`: completed train-split `field_selected_noexpert_bc5`;
121
  direct rollout is 26.84%, field-guided best is 27.65%.
 
255
  Bonuses `0.015` and `0.020` tie the current best at 35.25%; bonus `0.025`
256
  reaches 35.19%. Summary jobs `14897126`/`14897127`/`14897128` and rebuild job
257
  `14897129` completed.
258
+ - `14897548`/`14897549`: completed no-op-only CPU rollout smokes after excluding
259
+ wrong-gripper residuals from the safe residual family.
260
+ - `14897563`/`14897564`: completed no-op-only GPU arrays. Both no-op bonus
261
+ `0.03` and source-score bonus `0.02` reach 35.19%, one success below the
262
+ 35.25% safe-family plateau. Summary jobs `14897565`/`14897566` and rebuild
263
+ job `14897567` were submitted; local summary/analysis rebuilds were also run
264
+ while the CPU summary job was still pending.
265
  - `14869627`: completed CPU Apptainer smoke for the new residual scale-grid
266
  selector. It selected index `3` on a two-residual/two-scale toy case and
267
  returned the expected action `0.20`, validating the candidate expansion and
 
286
  the current best clean deployment diagnostic, not as a SOTA claim. The
287
  continuous train-source progress prior at bonus 0.03 ties this result without
288
  a hand typed no-op prior; train-source reward-score priors at 0.015/0.020 also
289
+ tie it. The no-op-only family ablation reaches 35.19%, so wrong-gripper
290
+ residuals are a marginal helper rather than the core mechanism. This is a
291
+ cleaner story hook but still not a higher SOTA number. The completed
292
+ K2/ray-search rows are near-ties that support the sparse-intervention story.
293
  - Use `results/paper_analysis.md` for paired seed deltas, per-task gaps, and
294
  selection histograms when writing reviewer-facing tables.
295
  - Treat z-score and task-relative retrieval metrics, source-progress viability gates,
scripts/build_paper_analysis.py CHANGED
@@ -163,6 +163,38 @@ METHODS = [
163
  "k4s040_safe_margin0p20_mean_by_type_noopbonus0p03_srcprog0p25_summary.json"
164
  ),
165
  ),
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
166
  MethodSpec(
167
  key="residual_k4_consensus_nooponly_noopbonus003",
168
  label="K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, no-op-only residuals, no-op bonus 0.03",
 
163
  "k4s040_safe_margin0p20_mean_by_type_noopbonus0p03_srcprog0p25_summary.json"
164
  ),
165
  ),
166
+ MethodSpec(
167
+ key="residual_k4_consensus_margin015_noopbonus003",
168
+ label="K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, margin 0.15, no-op bonus 0.03",
169
+ summary_path=(
170
+ "h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_"
171
+ "k4s040_safe_margin0p15_mean_by_type_noopbonus0p03_summary.json"
172
+ ),
173
+ ),
174
+ MethodSpec(
175
+ key="residual_k4_consensus_margin025_noopbonus003",
176
+ label="K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, margin 0.25, no-op bonus 0.03",
177
+ summary_path=(
178
+ "h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_"
179
+ "k4s040_safe_margin0p25_mean_by_type_noopbonus0p03_summary.json"
180
+ ),
181
+ ),
182
+ MethodSpec(
183
+ key="residual_k4_consensus_margin015_srcscorebonus002",
184
+ label="K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, margin 0.15, source-score bonus 0.02",
185
+ summary_path=(
186
+ "h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_"
187
+ "k4s040_safe_margin0p15_mean_by_type_srcscorebonus0p02_summary.json"
188
+ ),
189
+ ),
190
+ MethodSpec(
191
+ key="residual_k4_consensus_margin025_srcscorebonus002",
192
+ label="K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, margin 0.25, source-score bonus 0.02",
193
+ summary_path=(
194
+ "h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_"
195
+ "k4s040_safe_margin0p25_mean_by_type_srcscorebonus0p02_summary.json"
196
+ ),
197
+ ),
198
  MethodSpec(
199
  key="residual_k4_consensus_nooponly_noopbonus003",
200
  label="K4 mean-by-type tangent consensus, no-op-only residuals, no-op bonus 0.03",
scripts/build_paper_table_status.py CHANGED
@@ -465,6 +465,46 @@ SPECS = [
465
  story_role="soft train-source viability gate for sparse residual transport",
466
  pending_job="14894438/14894439",
467
  ),
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
468
  ResultSpec(
469
  key="retrieval_residual_k4_mean_nooponly_noopbonus003",
470
  label="K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, scale 0.40, margin 0.20, no-op-only residuals, no-op bonus 0.03",
 
465
  story_role="soft train-source viability gate for sparse residual transport",
466
  pending_job="14894438/14894439",
467
  ),
468
+ ResultSpec(
469
+ key="retrieval_residual_k4_mean_margin015_noopbonus003",
470
+ label="K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, scale 0.40, margin 0.15, no-op bonus 0.03",
471
+ path="h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_k4s040_safe_margin0p15_mean_by_type_noopbonus0p03_summary.json",
472
+ clean_deployment="yes",
473
+ same_state_proposals="no",
474
+ expert_proposal="no",
475
+ story_role="advantage-abstention margin fine sweep for sparse residual transport",
476
+ pending_job="14897841/14897845",
477
+ ),
478
+ ResultSpec(
479
+ key="retrieval_residual_k4_mean_margin025_noopbonus003",
480
+ label="K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, scale 0.40, margin 0.25, no-op bonus 0.03",
481
+ path="h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_k4s040_safe_margin0p25_mean_by_type_noopbonus0p03_summary.json",
482
+ clean_deployment="yes",
483
+ same_state_proposals="no",
484
+ expert_proposal="no",
485
+ story_role="advantage-abstention margin fine sweep for sparse residual transport",
486
+ pending_job="14897842/14897846",
487
+ ),
488
+ ResultSpec(
489
+ key="retrieval_residual_k4_mean_margin015_srcscorebonus002",
490
+ label="K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, scale 0.40, margin 0.15, source-score bonus 0.02",
491
+ path="h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_k4s040_safe_margin0p15_mean_by_type_srcscorebonus0p02_summary.json",
492
+ clean_deployment="yes",
493
+ same_state_proposals="no",
494
+ expert_proposal="no",
495
+ story_role="advantage-abstention margin fine sweep with measured train-source prior",
496
+ pending_job="14897843/14897847",
497
+ ),
498
+ ResultSpec(
499
+ key="retrieval_residual_k4_mean_margin025_srcscorebonus002",
500
+ label="K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, scale 0.40, margin 0.25, source-score bonus 0.02",
501
+ path="h16_policy_ckpt_near_miss_policy_bc5_bestpt_retrieval_residual_k4s040_safe_margin0p25_mean_by_type_srcscorebonus0p02_summary.json",
502
+ clean_deployment="yes",
503
+ same_state_proposals="no",
504
+ expert_proposal="no",
505
+ story_role="advantage-abstention margin fine sweep with measured train-source prior",
506
+ pending_job="14897844/14897848",
507
+ ),
508
  ResultSpec(
509
  key="retrieval_residual_k4_mean_nooponly_noopbonus003",
510
  label="K4 mean-by-type residual retrieval, scale 0.40, margin 0.20, no-op-only residuals, no-op bonus 0.03",