Hugging Face's logo

bhaskarvilles
/
aipm

ai-agents
multi-agent
interoperability
protocol
sdk
cryptography
python
Model card Files
xet
 Community
aipm / DISCUSSION_TEMPLATES.md
bhaskarvilles's picture
bhaskarvilles
Add discussion templates for community engagement
945c72b verified
preview code
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
12.6 kB

Discussion Templates for AIPM Repository

Use these templates to create discussions on the Hugging Face repository to engage the community.

Discussion 1: Welcome & Feedback

Title: 🎉 Welcome to AIPM - Share Your Thoughts!

Body:

Hello everyone! 👋

We're excited to launch AIPM (Agent Interoperability Protocol Models) - the first open protocol for AI agent interoperability.

What is AIPM?

AIPM enables AI agents from different vendors (OpenAI, Claude, LangGraph, AutoGen, CrewAI, etc.) to:

  • Discover each other's capabilities
  • Establish secure connections
  • Delegate tasks
  • Share memory
  • Build trust through reputation

Phase 1 is Complete! ✅

  • JSON protocol schemas
  • Python SDK with full handshake implementation
  • Ed25519 cryptographic security
  • Working examples
  • Interactive demo

We Need Your Feedback!

Please share your thoughts on:

  1. Use Cases: What problems could AIPM solve for you?
  2. Protocol Design: Any concerns or suggestions?
  3. SDK Improvements: What features do you need?
  4. Integration: How would you integrate this with your agents?
  5. Documentation: What's missing or unclear?

Try It Out 

git clone https://huggingface.co/bhaskarvilles/aipm
cd aipm/sdk-python && pip install -e .
cd ../examples && python basic_handshake.py

Or try the interactive demo directly!

Looking forward to your feedback! 🚀

Discussion 2: Use Cases & Applications

Title: 💡 Share Your AIPM Use Cases

Body:

We want to understand how AIPM can best serve the community!

What problems could cross-vendor agent communication solve for you?

Here are some ideas to get started:

🤝 Multi-Agent Workflows

  • Combining agents from different vendors in a single workflow
  • Example: OpenAI for analysis → Claude for writing → Stable Diffusion for visuals

🛠️ Skill Marketplaces

  • Discovering specialized agents (OCR, translation, data processing)
  • Pay-per-use model for agent services

🏢 Enterprise Integration

  • Internal agents communicating with external services
  • Maintaining security boundaries across vendors

🔄 Agent Orchestration

  • Dynamic task routing based on capability and cost
  • Load balancing across multiple agent providers

📊 Trust Networks

  • Building reputation scores for agent reliability
  • Selecting high-quality agents automatically

Your Turn!

Please share:

  1. What problem are you trying to solve?
  2. Which vendors/frameworks would you connect?
  3. What challenges do you foresee?
  4. What features would make this most valuable?

Template 

**Problem:** [What you're trying to solve]
**Vendors:** [Which agents/frameworks]
**Requirements:** [Must-have features]
**Concerns:** [Potential blockers]

Looking forward to creative use cases! 💭

Discussion 3: Protocol Design & Architecture

Title: 🏗️ Protocol Design Discussion - Shape the Future of AIPM

Body:

AIPM's core protocol is complete, but we're planning Phase 2 and want your input!

Current Design (Phase 1)

7-Step Handshake:

  1. HELLO - Initial connection
  2. CAPABILITY_EXCHANGE - Share skills/models
  3. AUTHENTICATION - Challenge-response
  4. PUBLIC_KEY_EXCHANGE - Ed25519 keys
  5. TRUST_VERIFICATION - Reputation scores
  6. READY - Session established

Security:

  • Ed25519 signatures
  • Message authentication
  • Session management

Phase 2 Planning

We're considering:

Task Negotiation

  • Accept/decline mechanism
  • Priority handling
  • Deadline support
  • Resource constraints

Message Signing

  • Automatic signature on all messages
  • Verification in processing pipeline

Transport Layer

  • HTTP REST endpoints
  • WebSocket for real-time
  • Message queuing

Questions for Discussion

  1. Handshake Steps: Too many? Too few? Missing anything?
  2. Security: Should we add end-to-end encryption? Key rotation?
  3. Task Negotiation: How should agents decide to accept/decline?
  4. Transport: HTTP, WebSocket, both, or something else?
  5. Backwards Compatibility: How to handle protocol versions?
  6. Error Handling: What error scenarios need better support?

Comparison with Other Protocols

How should AIPM relate to:

  • MCP (Model Context Protocol) - Tool connection protocol
  • OpenAI Assistants API - Proprietary agent format
  • LangChain protocols - Framework-specific patterns

Technical Deep Dives Welcome!

Feel free to:

  • Share implementation concerns
  • Propose alternative designs
  • Link to similar protocols
  • Suggest optimizations

Let's build the best protocol together! 🔧

Discussion 4: SDK Development & Language Support

Title: 🐍 SDK Development - Help Us Build SDKs for Your Language

Body:

AIPM's Python SDK is complete, but we need SDKs in other languages!

Current Status

✅ Python SDK (Complete)

  • Pydantic models
  • Handshake state machine
  • Ed25519 crypto
  • Full protocol support
  • Examples and docs

Planned SDKs

🚧 JavaScript/TypeScript

  • Node.js support
  • Browser compatibility
  • npm package

🚧 Rust

  • Type-safe implementation
  • High performance
  • WASM support

🚧 Go

  • Concurrent design
  • Microservices friendly
  • gRPC integration?

We Need Your Help!

Language Expertise:

  • Which languages do you use?
  • What libraries should we use?
  • What design patterns fit best?

Port the Python SDK:

  • Model validation (Pydantic → ?)
  • Cryptography (cryptography → ?)
  • HTTP client (httpx → ?)

Testing:

  • Cross-language compatibility
  • Performance benchmarks
  • Integration tests

How to Contribute

  1. Comment below with your language preference
  2. Claim a language if you want to lead development
  3. Review PRs for language-specific best practices
  4. Share examples of similar SDKs

Template for Language Proposals 

**Language:** [Your language]
**Experience:** [Your background]
**Approach:** [How you'd implement it]
**Libraries:** [Recommended dependencies]
**Timeline:** [When could you contribute]

Let's make AIPM available everywhere! 🌍

Discussion 5: Security & Trust Layer

Title: 🔒 Security Review & Trust Layer Design

Body:

Security is critical for agent interoperability. Let's discuss AIPM's security model!

Current Security Features

Cryptographic Foundation:

  • Ed25519 signatures (modern, secure, fast)
  • Message authentication
  • Public key infrastructure
  • Session management

Trust Scoring:

  • Reliability (0-1)
  • Accuracy (0-1)
  • Latency tracking
  • Success rate history

Security Questions

1. Is Ed25519 the right choice?

  • Pros: Fast, small keys, deterministic
  • Cons: Not post-quantum resistant
  • Alternatives: Dilithium (PQC), RSA, secp256k1?

2. Should we add end-to-end encryption?

  • Currently: Signatures only (authentication, not confidentiality)
  • Add: X25519 key exchange + ChaCha20-Poly1305?
  • Trade-off: Performance vs privacy

3. How to prevent replay attacks?

  • Current: Timestamp in messages
  • Add: Nonces, sequence numbers?

4. Trust score manipulation?

  • How to prevent fake positive reviews?
  • Proof-of-work for trust updates?
  • Decentralized trust registry?

5. Key rotation & revocation?

  • How often to rotate keys?
  • Certificate expiry?
  • Revocation list?

Attack Scenarios

Please think about:

  • Man-in-the-middle: How to prevent?
  • Replay attacks: Current protections sufficient?
  • Sybil attacks: Fake agents gaming trust scores?
  • DOS attacks: Rate limiting? Proof-of-work?
  • Malicious agents: How to quarantine?

Privacy Concerns

  • Capability disclosure: Too much info leaked?
  • Trust scores: Privacy implications?
  • Session tracking: Can agents be de-anonymized?

We Need Security Experts!

If you have expertise in:

  • Cryptography
  • Protocol security
  • Threat modeling
  • Penetration testing

Please review our design and share concerns!

Responsible disclosure: For serious security issues, please contact maintainers privately first.

Security is everyone's responsibility 🛡️

Discussion 6: Economic Layer & Marketplace

Title: 💰 Economic Layer Design - How Should Agents Pay Each Other?

Body:

AIPM envisions a marketplace where agents can offer services and get paid. Let's design it!

Current State

Agents declare economic info:

{
  "cost_per_request": 0.01,
  "currency": "USD",
  "billing_model": "per_request"
}

But there's no actual payment mechanism yet!

Design Questions

1. Billing Models

  • Per-request (one-time fee)
  • Per-token (like OpenAI)
  • Per-second (compute time)
  • Subscription (monthly access)
  • Hybrid models?

2. Payment Methods

  • Cryptocurrency (Ethereum, Polygon)?
  • Traditional payment gateways (Stripe)?
  • Credit system (buy credits, spend credits)?
  • Blockchain settlement?

3. Micropayments

  • Many agent calls = tiny payments
  • High transaction fees problem
  • Layer 2 solutions?
  • Payment channels?

4. Trust & Escrow

  • Pay upfront or after delivery?
  • Escrow service needed?
  • Dispute resolution?

5. Pricing Discovery

  • Market-based pricing?
  • Auctions for tasks?
  • Fixed rate cards?

Use Cases

Skill Marketplace:

  • Alice's OCR agent charges $0.001 per image
  • Bob needs 10,000 images processed
  • How to handle $10 payment efficiently?

Multi-Step Workflow:

  • Agent A delegates to B, B delegates to C
  • Each charges a fee
  • Final cost = sum of all fees?
  • How to prevent runaway costs?

Freelance Agents:

  • Specialized agent offers niche service
  • Variable pricing based on complexity
  • How to negotiate price?

Inspiration

Similar systems:

  • Lightning Network (Bitcoin micropayments)
  • Ethereum L2s (cheap transactions)
  • AWS Marketplace (software as service)
  • Stripe Connect (platform payments)

Your Ideas?

How would you design the economic layer?

  • What payment rails make sense?
  • How to minimize fees?
  • How to ensure fair pricing?
  • How to prevent fraud?

Let's build a fair marketplace! 💸

Discussion 7: Phase 2 Priorities - What Should We Build Next?

Title: 🗳️ Vote on Phase 2 Priorities

Body:

Phase 1 is complete! Help us prioritize Phase 2 features.

Planned Features

🔐 Cryptographic Signing

  • Automatic message signing
  • Signature verification in processing
  • Key rotation support
  • Estimated effort: 2-3 weeks
  • Impact: High (security)

🚀 HTTP/WebSocket Transport

  • REST API endpoints
  • Real-time WebSocket support
  • Message queuing and retry
  • Estimated effort: 4-6 weeks
  • Impact: High (usability)

✅ Task Negotiation Framework

  • Accept/decline mechanism
  • Capability matching
  • Priority and deadline handling
  • Estimated effort: 3-4 weeks
  • Impact: High (functionality)

🧪 Comprehensive Testing

  • Unit tests for all modules
  • Integration test suite
  • Performance benchmarks
  • Estimated effort: 2-3 weeks
  • Impact: Medium (reliability)

📝 Enhanced Documentation

  • API reference
  • Architecture guides
  • Video tutorials
  • Estimated effort: 2-3 weeks
  • Impact: Medium (adoption)

🔄 Memory Exchange Protocol

  • Efficient context sharing
  • Embedding exchange
  • Vector DB integration
  • Estimated effort: 4-5 weeks
  • Impact: Medium (advanced use)

Vote with Reactions!

React to this post with:

  • 👍 for Cryptographic Signing
  • 🚀 for Transport Layer
  • ✅ for Task Negotiation
  • 🧪 for Testing
  • 📝 for Documentation
  • 🔄 for Memory Exchange

Or Comment Below

Tell us:

  1. Which feature you need most
  2. Why it's important to you
  3. When you'd use it
  4. Any specific requirements

Timeline

Phase 2 target: Q3 2026 (3-4 months)

We can fit approximately 2-3 major features. Your votes will help us decide!

Make your voice heard! 🎙️

How to Create These Discussions

On Hugging Face

  1. Go to https://huggingface.co/bhaskarvilles/aipm
  2. Click the "Community" tab
  3. Click "New discussion"
  4. Copy one of the templates above
  5. Paste and customize as needed
  6. Add relevant tags
  7. Post!

Recommended Tags

  • feedback - For Discussion 1
  • use-cases - For Discussion 2
  • protocol - For Discussion 3
  • sdk - For Discussion 4
  • security - For Discussion 5
  • economics - For Discussion 6
  • roadmap - For Discussion 7

These templates will help bootstrap community engagement and gather valuable feedback for Phase 2! 🎯