AgriScope

Pixel-Grounded Multimodal Understanding for Agriculture Images

Abderrahmene Boudiaf, Mohamad Alanssari, Irfan Hussain, Sajid Javed
Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE

GitHub repository Paper coming soon Weights coming soon Dataset coming soon

Release status: This repository currently provides the AgriScope model card, project figures, task definitions, and reported manuscript results. Model weights, configuration files, processors, training code, and AgriGround annotations are coming soon.

Model Description

AgriScope and AgriGround overview

AgriScope is a pixel-grounded multimodal model for agricultural image understanding. It supports image-level, region-level, and pixel-level interaction within one framework, connecting generated agricultural concepts to segmentation masks and spatial annotations.

The model is designed to identify, describe, localize, and segment agricultural entities including plant diseases, lesions, pests, crops, weeds, botanical species, plant organs, and structural features. It supports both text-only responses and responses grounded in masks or normalized bounding boxes.

AgriScope is trained with AgriGround, a large-scale pixel-grounded agricultural instruction-tuning dataset containing 503,919 images and 11,421,148 samples across 14 tasks.

Model Details

Property Description
Model type Pixel-grounded multimodal language model
Domain Agriculture and plant imagery
Languages English
Parameter count 2B total parameters, as reported in the manuscript
Visual representation Biological semantic and dense spatial encoders
Grounding Language-conditioned [SEG] states with a SAM2-driven decoder
Adaptation Projection alignment followed by LoRA instruction tuning
License Apache-2.0 for repository materials and future code release
Model weights Coming soon

Architecture

AgriScope architecture

AgriScope combines complementary semantic and spatial pathways:

  1. A biological contextual encoder extracts agricultural and biological semantics.
  2. A global contextual encoder preserves texture, morphology, boundaries, and dense spatial information.
  3. Projection layers map visual representations into the multimodal language space.
  4. The language model generates text and special [SEG] tokens for grounded concepts.
  5. Each [SEG] hidden state conditions the SAM2-driven mask decoder to produce a corresponding pixel-level mask.

The manuscript implementation initializes its visual and grounding components from BioCLIP, DINOv3, and SAM2. The large pretrained encoders remain frozen while alignment modules and LoRA parameters are optimized.

Inputs

  • An agricultural RGB image
  • A natural-language instruction or question
  • An optional region for region-conditioned tasks
  • Optional conversation history for multi-turn interaction

Outputs

  • Natural-language captions and answers
  • Interleaved grounded captions with phrase-mask correspondence
  • Referring-expression, semantic, and part segmentation masks
  • Region-conditioned descriptions and conversations
  • Counts and normalized bounding boxes
  • Multi-turn grounded responses

Intended Uses

Primary Research Uses

  • Agricultural image captioning and visual question answering
  • Plant disease, pest, weed, crop, and species understanding
  • Referring expression and semantic segmentation
  • Grounded caption generation
  • Region-level and multi-turn grounded interaction
  • Agricultural object counting, detection, and localization
  • Research on interpretable and evidence-grounded agricultural AI

Out-of-Scope Uses

  • Autonomous pesticide, treatment, or crop-management decisions without expert review
  • Safety-critical agricultural robotics without independent perception safeguards
  • Regulatory, insurance, or legal determinations
  • Identification of entities outside the supported visual and agricultural domains

AgriGround Training Data

AgriGround annotation pipeline

AgriGround is produced using a four-stage annotation and task-generation pipeline:

  1. Generate detailed image captions, class descriptions, counts, and bounding-box metadata.
  2. Correct captions, identify grounded object phrases, and prepare segmentation prompts.
  3. Generate and align segmentation masks with grounded phrases.
  4. Synthesize instruction-following records for the 14 supported tasks.

Dataset Statistics

Split Images Samples Average samples/image
Train 401,234 9,095,320 22.66
Test 102,685 2,325,828 22.66
Total 503,919 11,421,148 22.66
Source group Images Share
Classification datasets 232,923 46.22%
Detection datasets 27,938 5.54%
iNatAg subset 169,324 33.60%
Insects (IP102) 73,734 14.63%

Supported Tasks

Family Tasks
Captioning Image-level captioning, region-level captioning, grounded caption generation
Segmentation Referring expression segmentation, semantic segmentation, part segmentation
Detection and localization Phrase grounding, grounded counting, grounded detection, reasoning detection
Conversation and QA Region-level conversation, multi-turn grounded conversation, classification QA, negative absence QA

Task-specific AgriGround examples

See docs/TASKS.md for definitions and per-task sample counts.

The source agricultural images are not distributed in this repository. Their original licenses and terms remain applicable. Annotation download instructions and dataset-specific licensing details will accompany the public dataset release.

Training Procedure

Training follows two stages described in the manuscript:

  1. Visual-language and grounding alignment: optimize projection layers, grounding modules, and the segmentation decoder while keeping the pretrained backbones frozen.
  2. Instruction tuning: apply parameter-efficient LoRA adaptation using the 14 AgriGround tasks while retaining frozen visual encoders.

The joint objective combines autoregressive language modeling with binary cross-entropy and Dice losses for segmentation supervision. Full hyperparameters, preprocessing, and reproducibility scripts will be released with the code.

Evaluation

The following results are reported in the current manuscript draft.

Task Metrics AgriScope
Image-level captioning CIDEr / ASF 146.4 / 86.7
Region-level captioning CIDEr / ASF 132.5 / 84.8
Classification QA Accuracy / F1 82.4 / 80.7
Grounded counting Accuracy 74.8
Semantic segmentation mIoU / Dice 66.1 / 78.4
Referring expression segmentation J&F / cIoU 67.30 / 72.65
Grounded caption generation METEOR / CIDEr 27.9 / 118.6
Grounded caption generation AP50 / mIoU / Recall 63.9 / 59.4 / 74.2

Efficiency

Parameters GFLOPs GPU memory Inference time
2B 177 6 GB 480 ms/image

Complete baseline comparisons, cross-dataset evaluation, ablations, and experimental settings will accompany the paper release.

Qualitative Results

Grounded Caption Generation

AgriScope grounded caption generation examples

Representative Tasks

AgriScope representative task results

Referring Expression Segmentation

Referring expression segmentation comparison

Limitations and Risks

  • AgriScope can produce plausible but incorrect descriptions, classifications, counts, or masks.
  • Performance may degrade under poor illumination, blur, occlusion, unusual viewpoints, severe domain shift, or very small targets.
  • Fine-grained diseases, species, and pests with similar visual characteristics may be confused.
  • Segmentation quality depends on the visual coverage and annotation quality of the training data.
  • Dataset composition may encode geographic, crop, acquisition, and class-frequency biases from its source datasets.
  • Outputs require review by qualified agricultural experts before being used for diagnosis or management decisions.

Repository Contents

.
|-- README.md
|-- CITATION.cff
|-- LICENSE
|-- docs/
|   `-- TASKS.md
`-- images/
    |-- overview.png
    |-- architecture.png
    |-- annotation_pipeline.png
    |-- task_examples_v3.png
    |-- qualitative_gcg.png
    |-- qualitative_tasks.png
    `-- referring_segmentation_comparison.png

Release Roadmap

Resource Status
Model weights and configuration Coming soon
Processor and inference example Coming soon
Training and evaluation code Coming soon
AgriGround train/test annotations Coming soon
Paper and final citation Coming soon

Development updates and future code releases are tracked in the AgriScope GitHub repository.

Citation

The final paper link and citation will be added upon release. Until then, please use:

@misc{boudiaf2026agriscope,
  title  = {AgriScope: Pixel-Grounded Multimodal Understanding for Agriculture Images},
  author = {Boudiaf, Abderrahmene and Alanssari, Mohamad and Hussain, Irfan and Javed, Sajid},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {Manuscript under review}
}

License

Repository documentation and the future code release are provided under the Apache License 2.0. AgriGround annotations and source images may be subject to separate terms, which will be documented with the dataset release.

Acknowledgments

This work was conducted at Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE. We acknowledge the creators and maintainers of the agricultural datasets and open-source foundation models that support this research.

Contact

For questions and collaborations, use the AgriScope GitHub issue tracker or the Hugging Face Community tab.

Downloads last month
-
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support