README.md

metadata

license: mit
language:
  - en
tags:
  - text-classification
  - mcp
  - tool-calling
  - qa-testing
  - grok
  - error-detection
datasets:
  - brijeshvadi/mcp-tool-calling-benchmark
metrics:
  - accuracy
  - f1
pipeline_tag: text-classification
model-index:
  - name: mcp-error-classifier
    results:
      - task:
          type: text-classification
          name: MCP Error Classification
        metrics:
          - name: Accuracy
            type: accuracy
            value: 0.923
          - name: F1
            type: f1
            value: 0.891

MCP Error Classifier

A fine-tuned text classification model that detects and categorizes MCP (Model Context Protocol) tool-calling errors in AI assistant responses.

Model Description

This model classifies AI assistant tool-calling behavior into 5 error categories identified during QA testing of Grok's MCP connector integrations:

Label	Description	Training Samples
CORRECT	Tool invoked correctly with proper parameters	2,847
TOOL_BYPASS	Model answered from training data instead of invoking the tool	1,203
FALSE_SUCCESS	Model claimed success but tool was never called	892
HALLUCINATION	Model fabricated tool response data	756
BROKEN_CHAIN	Multi-step workflow failed mid-chain	441
STALE_DATA	Tool called but returned outdated cached results	312

Training Details

• Base Model: distilbert-base-uncased
• Training Data: 6,451 labeled MCP interaction logs across 12 platforms
• Platforms Tested: Supabase, Notion, Miro, Vercel, Netlify, Canva, Linear, GitHub, Box, Slack, Google Drive, Jotform
• Epochs: 5
• Learning Rate: 2e-5
• Batch Size: 32

Usage

from transformers import pipeline

classifier = pipeline("text-classification", model="brijeshvadi/mcp-error-classifier")

result = classifier("Grok responded with project details but never called the Supabase list_projects tool")
# Output: [{'label': 'TOOL_BYPASS', 'score': 0.94}]

Intended Use

• QA evaluation of AI assistants' MCP tool-calling reliability
• Automated error categorization in MCP testing pipelines
• Benchmarking tool-use accuracy across different LLM providers

Limitations

• Trained primarily on Grok interaction logs; may underperform on Claude/ChatGPT patterns
• English only
• Requires context about which tool was expected vs. what was called

Citation

@misc{mcp-error-classifier-2026,
  author = {Brijesh Vadi},
  title = {MCP Error Classifier: Detecting Tool-Calling Failures in AI Assistants},
  year = {2026},
  publisher = {Hugging Face},
}