CASSANDRA — BCE configuration on AnnoCTR
Fine-tuned CTI-BERT models for extracting MITRE ATT&CK techniques from cyber threat intelligence (CTI) reports. This repository contains the BCE configuration of the CASSANDRA recipe trained on AnnoCTR (118 ATT&CK techniques), comprising 3 ensemble members trained with seeds {42, 123, 456}.
This is the headline configuration on AnnoCTR in the paper. The asymmetric-loss (ASL) variant regresses on this benchmark due to its low label density (mean 15.5 samples per class); BCE with pos_weight handles the rare classes more robustly.
Anonymous artifact for double-blind peer review. Author information will be added after the review period.
Headline result
On the AnnoCTR test set (33 scored documents):
- 3-seed ensemble per-document F1 (Ï„=0.5): 63.53%
- Exceeds CySecBERT's 62.75% (Buchel et al. 2025) without CySecBERT's additional 4.3M cybersecurity pre-training texts.
The per-seed table below shows the live artifact's individual seed F1s and ensemble F1; small variance from the headline (≤0.3 F1) reflects inference-time floating-point ordering on different hardware. Full per-seed and ensemble metrics are in results.json.
Architecture
LabelAttentionClassifier: a 110M-parameter CTI-BERT encoder followed by a per-label attention head.
- Encoder:
ibm-research/CTI-BERT(110M params, 768 hidden) - Head: 118 learned 768-dim label queries that attend over the encoder's
last_hidden_state, followed by a shared 1-output linear layer applied per-label - Loss: BCE with
pos_weight=5.0 - Regularization / training tricks: layer-wise learning rate decay (α=0.85), exponential moving average (β=0.999), multi-seed probability averaging at inference
The architecture is custom (not derived from transformers.PreTrainedModel), so loading requires the modeling.py file shipped with this repo.
Training data
- AnnoCTR: 104 reports, 5,265 sentences, 118 canonical ATT&CK techniques (113 train-present, 5 unobserved at training but present in test). Mean of 15.5 deduplicated positive examples per train-present class. 78 of 113 train-present classes have fewer than 10 positive examples.
- Splits: report-level train/test split from Buchel et al. (2025) "SoK: A Survey of Approaches for ATT&CK Classifier Construction" (70 train reports, 34 test reports — one test report excluded from per-document F1 due to empty in-vocabulary ground truth).
- Validation: 80:20 sentence-level random split within the training reports for early stopping and threshold selection.
Intended use
Map free-text CTI sentences to ATT&CK techniques. The model takes a single sentence and outputs a probability for each of 118 techniques.
Aggregation to document level (paper convention): apply per-sentence inference, take the per-class max across sentences in a document, threshold that, report the union of predicted techniques per document.
Limitations:
- Trained on English-language CTI; behavior on other languages is not characterized.
- The 118-label vocabulary is the canonical AnnoCTR set; sentences describing techniques outside this set will produce all-zero predictions.
- AnnoCTR's extreme sparsity (78 of 113 train-present techniques have fewer than 10 positives) means rare-technique predictions are noisier than common-technique predictions. Per-technique threshold tuning (provided as an option in
inference_example.py) does not consistently help for these ultra-rare techniques — see paper §3.1 (per-technique thresholding excluded from the recommended configuration).
How to load and run
from modeling import load_ensemble, predict_ensemble
import os, glob
seed_dirs = sorted(glob.glob(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), "seeds", "seed-*")))
seeds = load_ensemble(seed_dirs, device="cuda")
sentences = [
"The malware uses Windows Command Shell to execute encoded scripts.",
"After initial access, persistence was established via Registry Run Keys.",
]
results = predict_ensemble(seeds, sentences, threshold=0.5)
for sentence, techniques in results:
print(sentence, "->", techniques)
A complete CLI example is in inference_example.py:
pip install -r requirements.txt
python inference_example.py
Per-seed members
| Seed | Per-document F1 (Ï„=0.5) | Selected weights |
|---|---|---|
| 42 | 59.82% | EMA |
| 123 | 61.29% | EMA |
| 456 | 63.57% | EMA |
| 3-seed ensemble | 63.53% | — |
Citation
@misc{cassandra2026,
title = {CASSANDRA: How Many Parameters Suffice to Automate TTP Extractions from CTI Reports---Pushing Towards the Lower Bound},
author = {{Anonymous Authors}},
year = {2026},
note = {Anonymous submission under review}
}
Please also cite the AnnoCTR dataset and the CTI-BERT encoder.
License
Apache-2.0. These fine-tuned weights are derived from ibm-research/CTI-BERT.
Model tree for cassandra-anon/cassandra-bce-annoctr
Base model
ibm-research/CTI-BERT