| --- |
| license: apache-2.0 |
| language: en |
| pipeline_tag: text-classification |
| tags: |
| - deberta-v2 |
| - deberta-v3 |
| - sentiment-analysis |
| - federal-reserve |
| - economics |
| - finance |
| - central-bank-communication |
| - fomc |
| widget: |
| - text: "The Committee judges that the risks to the outlook for economic activity are weighted to the downside." |
| example_title: "Negative example (pessimistic economic assessment)" |
| - text: "Economic activity has continued to expand at a solid pace, and labor market conditions remain strong." |
| example_title: "Positive example (optimistic economic assessment)" |
| --- |
| |
| # FedDeBERTa |
|
|
| `FedDeBERTa` is a fine-tuned [`microsoft/deberta-v3-base`](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/deberta-v3-base) model for binary **sentiment** classification of Federal Reserve communications (FOMC statements, minutes, and related monetary-policy text). It classifies a sentence's economic-assessment tone as **Positive** (optimistic β language suggesting economic strength, growth, or confidence in the outlook) or **Negative** (pessimistic β language suggesting economic weakness, decline, or concern about conditions). |
|
|
| **Sentiment is not the same task as monetary-policy stance.** Stance classification asks whether policy is easing or tightening (dovish vs. hawkish); sentiment, as used here, asks only whether the text characterizes economic conditions positively or negatively. The two are related β markets sometimes read expressed economic concern as a signal of anticipated easing, and expressed optimism as a signal of anticipated tightening β but sentiment is not a policy vote and is not a substitute for stance. This model was trained and evaluated on sentiment labels only; it does not predict monetary-policy stance. |
|
|
| This is the **BASE** variant, fine-tuned directly from the general-purpose `deberta-v3-base` checkpoint (no domain-adaptive pretraining). A companion model, [`FedDeBERTa-DAPT`](https://huggingface.co/cbenne23/FedDeBERTa-DAPT), applies continued domain-adaptive pretraining on Federal Reserve text before fine-tuning on the same task. |
|
|
| Both models were developed as part of the dissertation *"Domain Adaptive Pretraining for Federal Reserve Sentiment Analysis: A Systematic Study of Small-Corpus Adaptation, Knowledge Distillation, and Cross-Bank Transfer"* by Christopher S. Bennett, University of Arkansas at Little Rock. |
|
|
| ## β οΈ Disclaimer |
|
|
| This is an academic research artifact released alongside a dissertation. It is **not intended as financial or investment advice**, and outputs should not be used as the sole basis for trading, investment, or policy decisions. Performance figures below reflect a held-out academic test set and may not generalize to other time periods, institutions, or communication styles. Use in any production or decision-making context is at the deployer's own risk. |
|
|
| ## Model details |
|
|
| | | | |
| |---|---| |
| | Base architecture | `DebertaV2ForSequenceClassification` (DeBERTa-v3-base backbone) | |
| | Hidden size | 768 | |
| | Layers / attention heads | 12 / 12 | |
| | Tokenizer | SentencePiece (Unigram), 128,001 vocabulary entries | |
| | Labels | `0: Negative`, `1: Positive` | |
| | Dropout (attention / hidden) | 0.05 / 0.05 | |
| | License | Apache-2.0 | |
|
|
| **A note on `vocab_size`:** this model's `config.json` reports `vocab_size: 128100`, and its embedding matrix has shape `(128100, 768)` β 99 rows larger than the tokenizer's actual 128,001-entry vocabulary. This is an inherited quirk from the upstream `microsoft/deberta-v3-base` checkpoint (99 reserved/unused embedding rows that no token id can ever reach) rather than a bug specific to this fine-tune; it was verified empirically before release and has no effect on model behavior. See `REPRODUCIBILITY.md` in the [companion GitHub repo](https://github.com/cbenne23/FedDeBERTa) for details. |
| |
| ## Training data |
| |
| Fine-tuned on a labeled corpus of Federal Reserve communication sentences (source file referenced internally as `FED_prelabelled_sent_fixed.csv`), with each sentence labeled Positive or Negative for economic-assessment tone. Full dataset construction and labeling methodology are described in the dissertation. |
| |
| ## Evaluation |
| |
| Evaluated on a frozen, grouped stratified 80/20 held-out test split (seed=42, N=1,322: 718 Negative / 604 Positive), verified independently against archived model predictions and cross-checked row-by-row against the frozen split manifest (100% match). |
| |
| | Metric | Value | |
| |---|---| |
| | Weighted F1 | 81.19% | |
| | Accuracy | 81.24% | |
| | Negative β precision / recall / F1 | 0.8133 / 0.8496 / 0.8311 | |
| | Positive β precision / recall / F1 | 0.8112 / 0.7682 / 0.7891 | |
| |
| Compared to the DAPT variant, this BASE model performs within statistical noise of the DAPT model on this test set (ΞF1-weighted = +0.16pp favoring DAPT, 95% CI [-1.44, +1.76]pp, Holm-corrected p = 1.000 β not statistically significant). See the dissertation and `REPRODUCIBILITY.md` for the full statistical methodology (McNemar's test, Holm-Bonferroni correction, bootstrap CIs). |
| |
| ## Usage |
| |
| ```python |
| from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSequenceClassification |
| import torch |
| |
| tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("cbenne23/FedDeBERTa") |
| model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("cbenne23/FedDeBERTa") |
| model.eval() |
| |
| text = "The Committee judges that the risks to the outlook for economic activity are weighted to the downside." |
| inputs = tokenizer(text, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, max_length=512) |
| with torch.no_grad(): |
| logits = model(**inputs).logits |
| pred_id = torch.argmax(logits, dim=-1).item() |
| print(model.config.id2label[pred_id]) # "Negative" |
| ``` |
| |
| ## Checkpoint integrity |
| |
| `model.safetensors` SHA-256: `aef5deed2088793e9a416ca7ea7c89ee9d1bd01d9c64886f41a9e82c7af6a188` |
| |
| ## Citation |
| |
| If you use this model, please cite the dissertation: |
| |
| ```bibtex |
| @phdthesis{bennett_fed_sentiment, |
| author = {Bennett, Christopher S.}, |
| title = {Domain Adaptive Pretraining for Federal Reserve Sentiment Analysis: A Systematic Study of Small-Corpus Adaptation, Knowledge Distillation, and Cross-Bank Transfer}, |
| school = {University of Arkansas at Little Rock}, |
| year = {2026} |
| } |
| ``` |
| |