Automated MNLP evaluation report (2026-06-11)

EVAL_REPORT.md

@@ -2,18 +2,24 @@
 
 - **Model repo:** [`cs-552-2026-centralesupechec/multilingual_model`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-centralesupechec/multilingual_model)
 - **Owner(s):** group **centralesupechec**
-- **Generated at:** 2026-05-18T02:30:25+00:00 (UTC)
+- **Generated at:** 2026-06-11T06:23:10+00:00 (UTC)
 - **Pipeline:** [mnlp-project-ci](https://github.com/eric11eca/mnlp-project-ci)
 
 _This PR is opened automatically by the course CI. It is **non-blocking** — you do not need to merge it. The next nightly run will refresh this file._
 
+## Evaluated checkpoint
+
+- **Commit:** [`90cd989`](https://huggingface.co/cs-552-2026-centralesupechec/multilingual_model/commit/90cd989e504e0c7ccd29e18c4975bfc038125e4a)
+- **Message:** Upload folder using huggingface_hub
+- **Committed:** 2026-06-09T17:30:55+00:00
+
 ## Summary
 
 | Benchmark | Accuracy | Status |
 |---|---:|---|
 | Math | — | not run |
 | Knowledge | — | not run |
-| Multilingual | 0.5800 | ok |
+| Multilingual | 0.5700 | ok |
 | Safety | — | not run |
 
 ## Sample completions
@@ -24,56 +30,56 @@ _Prompts are intentionally omitted to avoid revealing benchmark contents. For mu
 
 **Correct** (1 shown)
 
-- **reference**: `D`
+- **reference**: `B`
 - **overall** (1/1 completions correct)
-- **extracted** (✓): `D`
+- **extracted** (✓): `B`
 - **completion**:
 
     ```text
-    Okay, let's try to figure out this question. The question is about when a product or service is presented with another complementary product or service. The options are A to D.
+    Okay, let's tackle this question. The question is asking which of the given options is not a lesson (урок) of control of knowledge, skills, and abilities. The choices are A. лабораторная работа (laboratory work), B. суггестивный (suggestive), C. сочинение (composition), D. компьютерный (computer).
     
-    First, I need to recall what each of these terms means. Let me start by breaking down the question. The key part is "complementary product or service." So, when a product is sold along with another product that's supposed
+    First, I need to understand what each term means in the context of education. "Урок контроля знаний
     
     ... [truncated 823 chars] ...
     
-    re in the context of the question. Let me check the options again.
+    n way to assess students' ability to organize their thoughts, use language, and express ideas. So this is a lesson that controls knowledge and skills. So C is a correct lesson.
     
-    The question is asking when a product is presented with another complementary product. So, the answer would be the term that refers to combining products. In pricing terms, bundling is when you combine products. However, the options are A to D. Let me think about each option again.
+    D. Компьютерный – Computer-based. This could refer to a lesson that uses computers, like a computer lab session. Such lessons are often used to control students' ability to use technology, which is a skill. So D is a lesson that controls skills and abilities.
     
-    Option C is "value differentiation," which is about making the product unique. Option D is "pure value bundling," which sounds like combining products. But I need to be precise. In pricing, when you bundle two products, it's called bundling. However, the term "pure value bundling" might be a specific term. Alternatively, maybe "value bundling" is the term, but the options are translated.
+    Now, the question is which one is NOT a lesson of control. If B is a suggestive method, maybe it's not a lesson that controls knowledge, skills, and abilities. But wait, suggestive methods are part of teaching methods, not necessarily assessments. For example, if a teacher uses suggestive questions to guide students, that's part of the teaching process, not an assessment. Therefore, B might not be a lesson that controls knowledge, skills, and abilities, but rather a teaching method. So the answer would be B.
     
-    Alternatively, maybe "value bundling" is the correct answer here. But I need to make sure. Let me think of examples. If a company sells a printer and a printer ink, that's bundling. So, the answer would be D. But I'm not entirely sure. Alternatively, maybe "value differentiation" is when you present a product with another to show their combined value. But I think the correct answer here is D. Pure value bundling. So the answer is D.
+    Alternatively, maybe "suggestive" is a term that refers to a type of lesson. But I think in Russian education, "suggestive" (суггестивный) is more likely a teaching method rather than a lesson type. Therefore, the answer is B.
     </think>
     
-    \boxed{D}
+    \boxed{B}
     ```
 
 **Incorrect** (1 shown)
 
-- **reference**: `D`
+- **reference**: `C`
 - **overall** (0/1 completions correct)
-- **extracted** (✗): `C`
+- **extracted** (✗): `D`
 - **completion**:
 
     ```text
-    Okay, let's try to figure this out. So, there's a contract between a aluminum can manufacturer and a sheet aluminum supplier. The original contract was signed on June 1st, 2023, stating that the supplier would supply the manufacturer's aluminum sheet requirements for two years starting August 1st, at $3.00 per unit. 
+    Okay, let's try to figure out this question. The question is about replacing a supply chain with something and how it affects the importance of a certain aspect and the impact on each activity. The options are A to D.
     
-    Then, on June 16th, the manufacturer asked for 2000 units before August 1st. The
+    First, I need to understand the original sentence structure. The sentence is: "用_______取代供应链提高了产品_______的重要性，并对公司会产生_______的每一项活动进行根本性的重新设计。" Translating that, it's something like "
     
     ... [truncated 823 chars] ...
     
-    part of the original contract. Since the June 25th contract introduces entirely new terms (price and minimum requirement), it is not an amendment of the original contract but a **new agreement**.
-    3. **Preexisting Duty**: The supplier had a preexisting duty under the June 1st contract. However, the June 25th contract is a **separate agreement**, not an amendment. Therefore, the June 25th contract is not inapplicable due to a preexisting duty.
-    4. **Option Evaluation**:
-       - **Option A**: Incorrect. The June 25th contract is a new agreement, not inapplicable due to a preexisting duty.
-       - **Option B**: Incorrect. There is new consideration (price and minimum requirement), so the contract is valid and not inapplicable.
-       - **Option C**: Correct. The June 25th contract is a **new agreement** that modifies the original terms, making it an **amendment** to the original contract.
-       - **Option D**: Incorrect. The June 25th contract is not a valid modification of the original contract because the terms are different.
+    ly chain with something (like a global production network) would lead to the product's importance in terms of profit being increased, and each activity being redesigned. So the answer would be D: 供应环, 重新设计, 利润. 
+    
+    Alternatively, if the first blank is "全球生产网络", then the answer would be A: 全球生产网络, 重新设计, 利润. 
+    
+    But the question is about replacing the supply chain with something. If the supply chain is replaced by a global production network, then the first blank is the replacement, which is "全球生产网络". So the answer would be A. 
     
-    ### Conclusion:
-    The June 25th contract is a new agreement that modifies the original terms. Therefore, it is a valid **amendment** to the original contract.
+    But I'm not sure. Another angle: the term "供应环" (supply ring) might be a mistranslation of "supply chain". If the answer is D, then the first blank is "供应环" (supply ring), which is the supply chain. So the sentence would be "用供应环取代供应链..." which is not correct. But maybe in the context of the question, it's acceptable. 
     
-    $$
-    \boxed{C}
-    $$
+    Alternatively, maybe the correct answer is D, because replacing the supply chain with a supply ring (which is the supply chain) would lead to re-designing the product's importance and profit. 
+    
+    I think the answer is D. So the first blank is 供应环 (supply ring), second is 重新设计 (re-design), third is 利润 (profit). So the answer is D.
+    </think>
+    
+    \boxed{D}
     ```