rameau / eval /README.md
4esv's picture
Rameau v1: 21,940 records, 4 configs, verified gold, eval harness
83733b9 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
1.75 kB

Rameau evaluation protocol

Gold is deterministic, so scoring is exact match. No LLM judge.

Protocol

  • Split: test. Leakage-free by construction; no shape in test appears in train or validation, in any key or framing.
  • Prompts: zero-shot, versioned in prompts.py. Scores are comparable only at equal PROMPT_VERSION.
  • Decoding: temperature 0. Set max_tokens high enough that it never binds. A reasoning model that spends its whole budget thinking returns nothing, and nothing scores nothing.

Running

python eval/run_model.py --config notes_to_rn --model <model> --out preds.jsonl
python eval/score.py preds.jsonl --config notes_to_rn --split test

Both scripts are stdlib-only. run_model.py speaks to any OpenAI-compatible endpoint (ollama, vLLM, OpenAI, OpenRouter). Predictions carry shape_id and key for joining, plus the model, prompt version, reasoning setting, and finish reason, so a predictions file documents its own run.

Parsing

The scorer is lenient about wrapping and strict about the answer. It strips code fences and surrounding prose (the answer is read from the last matching lines), maps unicode music symbols to the dataset's ASCII (b, #, o, %), and drops separator tokens between numerals. It does not forgive wrong case: i64 is not I64, and minor versus major is usually the question.

Unparseable responses count as wrong and are tallied in parse_failures, so format problems stay visible instead of hiding in the accuracy.

Metrics

config metrics
*_to_rn exact (labels and cadence both correct), labels_exact, chord_acc (positional), cadence_acc, parse_failures
key_id exact, tonic_acc, mode_acc, parse_failures