| | --- |
| | license: cc-by-2.0 |
| | pretty_name: Characterizing weaving patterns, n = 7 |
| | --- |
| | |
| | # Dataset Card for Weaving Patterns of Size, \\(n = 7\\) |
| |
|
| | Weaving patterns are \\(n \times n−1\\)-matrices with \\(\{1, 2, . . . , n\}\\)- |
| | entries introduced by \[1\] to study the number of reduced decompositions of the |
| | permutation \\(\sigma = n\; n − 1 \;\dots\; 1\\) up to commutation equivalence. The number |
| | of such objects also counts the number of parallel sorting |
| | networks, the number of rhombic tilings of regular polygons, and is connected to |
| | the study of the higher Bruhat orders \[2\]. An \\(O(n^2)\\) algorithm for determining |
| | if a given \\(\{1, 2, . . . , n\}\\)-matrix is a valid weaving pattern |
| | exists but gives no additional insight into the structure of |
| | weaving patterns and correspondingly the asymptotics of |
| | reduced decompositions. The enumeration of reduced decompositions |
| | up to commutation equivalence has been studied by many including |
| | Knuth and Stanley. An exact formula is likely out of reach, |
| | so asymptotic upper and lower bounds are of great interest. |
| | ML models that can detect necessary or sufficient conditions |
| | for a matrix to be a valid weaving pattern have the potential |
| | to lead to substantial improvements in the upper bound. |
| |
|
| | Each dataset is a mixture of enriched weaving patterns and |
| | non-weaving pattern matrices with \\(\{1, 2, . . . , n\}\\)-entries. |
| |
|
| | ## Dataset Details |
| |
|
| | Weaving patterns of size \\(n \times n − 1\\) are a special type of matrix containing |
| | entries in \\(\{1, 2, . . . , n\}\\). They correspond to representations of the |
| | longest word permutation of \\(n\\) elements (the permutation that sends |
| | \\(1 \mapsto n\\), \\(2 \mapsto n − 1\\), etc.). This |
| | task involves trying to identify weaving patterns among matrices that look like weaving patterns but are not. |
| | Each matrix is stored on a single line in row-major format. For instance, |
| |
|
| | `(0, 1, 2, 3, 3, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 2, 1, 5, 4, 3, 2)` |
| |
|
| | The datasets can also be found [here](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HsWuHpTkCOtpyTG2dFH49jzkKIZYwKG8/view?usp=sharing). |
| | Data loaders can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/weaving_patterns). |
| |
|
| | **Statistics** |
| | | | Weaving patterns | Non-weaving patterns | |
| | |----------|----------|---------------| |
| | | Train | 17,388 | 96,012 | |
| | | Test | 7,310 | 41,290 | |
| |
|
| | This dataset is small, we encourage users to also look at the dataset for \\(n = 7\\). |
| |
|
| | **Math question:** Find an algorithm or set of rules that can efficiently distinguish between |
| | weaving pattern matrices and non-weaving pattern matrices. This should be more efficient than the |
| | \\(O(n^2\\) algorithm that can be found in the references above. |
| |
|
| | **ML task:** Train a model to classify whether a \\(\{1, 2, . . . , n\}\\)- |
| | matrix is a weaving pattern or not. This task is framed as |
| | binary classification. Extract mathematical insights from a performant model. |
| |
|
| | If a successful model is trained, it would be interesting to understand whether the model has |
| | learned an existing algorithm or whether it has discovered something new. |
| |
|
| | ## Small model performance |
| |
|
| | We provide some basic baselines for this task. Benchmarking details can be found in the associated paper. |
| |
|
| | | Size | Logistic regression | MLP | Transformer | Guessing largest class | |
| | |----------|----------|-----------|------------|------------| |
| | | \\(n= 7\\) | \\(85.8\%\\) | \\(99.3\% \pm 0.2\%\\) | \\(99.9\% \pm 0.4\%\\)| \\(85.0\%\\) | |
| |
|
| | The \\(\pm\\) signs indicate 95% confidence intervals from random weight initialization and training. |
| |
|
| | - **Curated by:** Herman Chau |
| | - **Funded by:** Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
| | - **Language(s) (NLP):** NA |
| | - **License:** CC-by-2.0 |
| |
|
| | ### Dataset Sources |
| |
|
| | Data generation scripts can be found [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/symmetric_group_character). |
| |
|
| | - **Repository:** [ACD Repo](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/weaving_patterns) |
| | |
| | ## Uses |
| |
|
| | This dataset was generated to study ML model's ability yield insight on an open |
| | problem in algebraic combinatorics, specifically, the problem of better understanding commutation |
| | equivalent representations of reduced words coresponding to the longest permutation. |
| |
|
| | ### Direct Use |
| |
|
| | We use this dataset for a classification task distinguishing between weaving and non-weaving patterns. |
| |
|
| | ### Out-of-Scope Use |
| |
|
| | None. |
| |
|
| | ## Dataset Structure |
| |
|
| | Each matrix is stored on a single line in row-major format. For instance, |
| |
|
| | `(0, 1, 2, 3, 3, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 2, 1, 5, 4, 3, 2)` |
| |
|
| | ## Dataset Creation |
| |
|
| | Data generation scripts can be found |
| | [here](https://github.com/pnnl/ML4AlgComb/tree/master/weaving_patterns). |
| |
|
| | ### Curation Rationale |
| |
|
| | This dataset was generated as a test of current AI system's ability to advance |
| | research mathematics. |
| |
|
| | #### Who are the source data producers? |
| |
|
| | Herman Chau wrote code to generate this dataset. |
| |
|
| | ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations |
| |
|
| | We only provide data for weaving patterns of size \\(6 \times 5\\) and \\(7 \times 6\\) in this repository. |
| | We are happy to generate (subsets) of datasets for larger values of \\(n \times n-1\)). |
| |
|
| | ## Citation |
| |
|
| | **BibTeX:** |
| |
|
| |
|
| | @article{chau2025machine, |
| | title={Machine learning meets algebraic combinatorics: A suite of datasets capturing research-level conjecturing ability in pure mathematics}, |
| | author={Chau, Herman and Jenne, Helen and Brown, Davis and He, Jesse and Raugas, Mark and Billey, Sara and Kvinge, Henry}, |
| | journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06366}, |
| | year={2025} |
| | } |
| | |
| |
|
| | **APA:** |
| |
|
| | Chau, H., Jenne, H., Brown, D., He, J., Raugas, M., Billey, S., & Kvinge, H. (2025). Machine learning meets algebraic combinatorics: A suite of datasets capturing research-level conjecturing ability in pure mathematics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06366. |
| |
|
| | ## Dataset Card Contact |
| |
|
| | Henry Kvinge, acdbenchdataset@gmail.com |
| |
|
| | ## References |
| |
|
| | \[1\] Felsner, Stefan. "On the number of arrangements of pseudolines." Proceedings of the twelfth annual Symposium on Computational Geometry. 1996. |
| | \[2\] Chau, Herman. "On enumerating higher bruhat orders through deletion and contraction." arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10532 (2024). |