184 / README.md
Y-xvan's picture
184: KolektorSDD -> T-B1 (unified SFT; viewer-friendly row groups)
9c64c9f verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
3.41 kB
metadata
tags:
  - smart-manufacturing
  - sft
  - industrial
  - vision
license: other
pretty_name: '184'
extra_gated_fields:
  Name: text
  Affiliation: text
  Intended use: text
extra_gated_prompt: >-
  This dataset is released for **research use**. Access is reviewed and granted
  **manually** by the maintainers. Please state your name, affiliation, and
  intended use.

184

Electrical-commutator surface-defect binary detection (segmentation GT). Category B, task T-B1, in the unified Smart-Manufacturing SFT schema.

The repository name is an internal task code. See Provenance below for the underlying dataset.

Records

399 records (train=399). Pixel masks are embedded as a mask image column.

Unified SFT schema

field type meaning
query str the question / instruction (model input)
image Image the input image (bytes embedded)
annot str the answer — for this dataset: the plain-text image-level label good or anomalous (binary; no defect types — the label is derived from the pixel mask). The binary segmentation mask is deferred localization GT, with seg info (mask_path, defect_area_fraction) in metadata — see Task, mask & split below
reasoning null no native CoT in these datasets
cate "B" SFT category
task "T-xx" unified task id
metadata str (JSON) split, provenance, image_path, image_sha256 (dedup key)
mask Image | null (T-B1/T-B2 only) the pixel ground-truth mask, bytes embedded
masks list[Image] (D21 only) multi-region masks

Task, mask & split

What this is. KolektorSDD (Tabernik et al., "Segmentation-Based Deep-Learning Approach for Surface-Defect Detection", J. Intelligent Manufacturing 2020) — 399 grayscale images of electrical-commutator surfaces from 50 items (8 sections each); 52 defective, 347 defect-free. Each image ships a pixel-level binary defect mask.

Task & label. Surface-defect detection: image-level binary (defect vs OK) + pixel-level segmentation. The source has no good/defect folders — the image-level label is derived from the mask (any nonzero pixel -> anomalous). query (our template) asks only whether the surface is good or anomalous; annot is the plain-text answer good or anomalous. The query does not ask for a mask.

Segmentation (deferred GT). The binary segmentation mask is kept in the mask column as localization ground truth (anomalous images only; good images have mask=null). Per-image seg info is in metadata: mask_path and defect_area_fraction. A text-output model cannot emit a pixel mask, so segmentation is deferred.

Split. No train/test split in the source (the paper uses 3-fold cross-validation) -> single train (399 images: 52 anomalous + 347 good).

Provenance

Underlying dataset: KolektorSDD. Upstream license: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 (this card is license: other; respect the upstream terms). Converted read-only from the raw source into the unified schema; conversion script: 184/convert_d84.py, published with publish/push_to_hf.py, both in AI4Manufacturing/forge_model.

Overlap / de-duplication (§8)

None notable. Each record carries metadata.image_sha256 so overlapping images can be kept entirely on one side of a train/eval split.