CWRU-perception / README.md
weipang142857's picture
Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
6dfe897 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
6.44 kB
---
dataset_info:
- config_name: reshaped
features:
- name: query
dtype: string
- name: image
dtype: image
- name: annot
dtype: string
- name: reasoning
dtype: 'null'
- name: cate
dtype: string
- name: task
dtype: string
- name: metadata
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 2799834.0
num_examples: 660
- name: test
num_bytes: 804907.0
num_examples: 196
download_size: 3112924
dataset_size: 3604741.0
- config_name: scalogram
features:
- name: query
dtype: string
- name: image
dtype: image
- name: annot
dtype: string
- name: reasoning
dtype: 'null'
- name: cate
dtype: string
- name: task
dtype: string
- name: metadata
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 73707615.0
num_examples: 660
- name: test
num_bytes: 19408454.0
num_examples: 196
download_size: 92514054
dataset_size: 93116069.0
- config_name: spectrogram
features:
- name: query
dtype: string
- name: image
dtype: image
- name: annot
dtype: string
- name: reasoning
dtype: 'null'
- name: cate
dtype: string
- name: task
dtype: string
- name: metadata
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 51987919.0
num_examples: 660
- name: test
num_bytes: 15522216.0
num_examples: 196
download_size: 66907507
dataset_size: 67510135.0
- config_name: waveform
features:
- name: query
dtype: string
- name: image
dtype: image
- name: annot
dtype: string
- name: reasoning
dtype: 'null'
- name: cate
dtype: string
- name: task
dtype: string
- name: metadata
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 25883822.0
num_examples: 660
- name: test
num_bytes: 7228727.0
num_examples: 196
download_size: 32452056
dataset_size: 33112549.0
configs:
- config_name: reshaped
data_files:
- split: train
path: reshaped/train-*
- split: test
path: reshaped/test-*
- config_name: scalogram
data_files:
- split: train
path: scalogram/train-*
- split: test
path: scalogram/test-*
- config_name: spectrogram
data_files:
- split: train
path: spectrogram/train-*
- split: test
path: spectrogram/test-*
- config_name: waveform
data_files:
- split: train
path: waveform/train-*
- split: test
path: waveform/test-*
task_categories:
- image-classification
license: cc-by-4.0
tags:
- bearing-fault-diagnosis
- vibration
- signal-to-image
- cwru
pretty_name: CWRU Bearing Fault Perception Representations (signal→VLM)
---
# CWRU — perception representations (visual grounding)
The same CWRU bearing windows rendered as **perception** images — one HF **config** per representation. A frozen VLM vision encoder carries *real but modest* class signal from all of these (shuffle-controlled probe): on a within-condition split it scores high, but under a strict **bearing-wise** split (unseen bearings) it is only slightly above chance — generalizing CWRU fault type across bearings is hard for *every* method, including a purpose-built 1D-CNN. So these are included as **representation-diversity / grounding** data for the foundation model (not as a high-accuracy CWRU classifier). Unlike the `CWRU` (spectrum) repo, they are **not** for compute-then-check CoT (`reasoning` stays empty) — the discriminative signal is non-verbal texture.
## Configs
```python
load_dataset("AI4Manufacturing/CWRU-perception", "spectrogram")
```
| config | records | splits |
|---|---|---|
| `spectrogram` | 856 | {'train': 660, 'test': 196} |
| `scalogram` | 856 | {'train': 660, 'test': 196} |
| `waveform` | 856 | {'train': 660, 'test': 196} |
| `reshaped` | 856 | {'train': 660, 'test': 196} |
## Schema (7-field unified record)
| field | meaning |
|---|---|
| `query` | the classification instruction (representation-aware) |
| `image` | the rendered signal image (bytes embedded) |
| `annot` | gold fault class: normal / inner_race / outer_race / ball |
| `reasoning` | chain-of-thought (empty here; filled in the `-annotated` sibling) |
| `cate` / `task` | `C` / `T-C1` (signal fault classification) |
| `metadata` | JSON string: representation, features, fault_freqs, computed_verdict, computed_snr, evidence_tier, sr_nondiagnosable, anomaly, size_in, load_hp, or_position, bearing, bearing_group, channel, rpm, fs, fr_hz, file_number, window_idx, image_sha256, split |
## Provenance & reproducibility
Generated **deterministically** by `forge_agent/examples/cwru/convert.py` (`8f7c384bda`) → `forge_model/CWRU/convert_cwru.py` (`a88573f32f`); see `provenance.json` for the full record.
Cleaning (all encoded in the pinned code): excluded the NTN 0.028″ files `3001–3008` (wrong bearing geometry) and the corrupt `191`; flagged Smith & Randall (2015) non-diagnosable (`sr_nondiagnosable`) and acquisition-anomaly files; **bearing-wise leakage-safe split** (all loads + both sample rates of a physical bearing stay on one side). **Evidence-gated release:** a computed `evidence_tier` (from the envelope-spectrum detector vs the gold label, cross-checked against the Smith & Randall expert grades) curates the published set so every image visibly supports its label — the spectrum/reasoning repo keeps `confirmed` only (faithful compute-then-check CoT); the perception repo keeps `confirmed`+`weak` and drops `absent`.
## Caveats
- **Ball is the hard class** — Smith & Randall (2015) grade most CWRU ball faults non-diagnosable (intermittent load-zone contact + smeared BSF), so many ball windows are `weak`/`absent`. The evidence gate keeps only the diagnosable ones, so the reasoning/spectrum track has the fewest ball records (`confirmed`-only) while perception also admits `weak` ball. A property of the data, not the converter.
- **Class balance** — after gating, `normal` is the minority (CWRU ships few baseline files) and `outer_race` the majority; per-class counts are in the header above.
- **Eval**: use the provided bearing-wise split; the within-condition (per-load) split inflates accuracy.
## Source & license
Source: **Case Western Reserve University Bearing Data Center** (engineering.case.edu/bearingdatacenter), openly available for research. Diagnosability grades and anomaly flags from W. A. Smith & R. B. Randall, *MSSP* 64–65 (2015) 100–131; leakage-safe split per J. Hendriks et al., *MSSP* 169 (2022) 108732.