You need to agree to share your contact information to access this dataset

This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content.

Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this dataset content.

IEEE-BRB-annotated

Stator-current spectra of a mains-fed induction motor around the supply line, as a binary rotor-cage task: healthy / broken_bars. 477 records. reasoning is filled on every record; the twin repo IEEE-BRB is identical except that field is empty.

The reading

One quantity, and it is what an eye judges on a spectrum: at the pair of marks either side of the supply line, how far does the line stand above its own two shoulders.

Measured over the 477 shipped records, per load, as a ratio to what sits immediately beside the mark:

load threshold healthy broken_bars gap
2.5 N·m 1.33x 1.01 – 1.25x 1.87 – 4.63x 1.50x
3.0 N·m 1.47x 1.05 – 1.32x 2.09 – 6.19x 1.59x
3.5 N·m 2.02x 1.11 – 1.75x 3.94 – 11.90x 2.24x
4.0 N·m 2.35x 1.42 – 2.24x 6.12 – 19.12x 2.73x

The line is fitted on healthy training records only -- no faulted record and no test record touches it -- as the mean plus three standard deviations of the healthy training prominence at that load. On the shipped set it is right on 477 of 477.

Why the line moves with load. More load means more slip, which pushes the sidebands further out and makes them easier to separate; but it also brings out the sound rotor's own unevenness, which no real cage is without. So the same small bump counts at 2.5 N.m and does not at 4.0. The load is in the query for that reason; it is an operating condition, every load carries both classes, and it says nothing about the answer on its own.

Where the marks come from. The supply frequency is read off the spectrum and the shaft speed off the shaft line in the frame accelerometer -- a channel that never sees the current sideband. Together they fix the slip, and the marks go at twice the slip either side of the supply line. The previous release took the slip from the nameplate scaled by load, which runs about 20 % high: at 4.0 N.m its mark sat 0.78 Hz outside the peak it was pointing at.

The honest number

leave one repetition out -- the line refitted on the rest each time:

held out right
each of 10 groups 477 / 477

leave one phase clamp out -- the line refitted on the rest each time:

held out right
Ia 156 / 159
Ib 159 / 159
Ic 159 / 159
all 474 / 477

leave one faulted rotor out -- the line refitted on the rest each time:

held out right
r2b 120 / 120
r3b 120 / 120
r4b 117 / 117
rs 0 / 0
all 357 / 357

120 records fell in a fold whose line could not be refitted and are not counted.

A load cannot be held out, because the line is fitted per load and holding one out leaves nothing to fit it with. What the rotor fold asks is the useful question: the line is placed by healthy records alone, so an unseen faulted rotor is genuinely unseen.

The three clamps are not quite interchangeable. Every miss in the phase fold is the same thing: three healthy runs on Ia at 4.0 N·m, where a line fitted on Ib and Ic alone comes out about 1.3 dB too tight. At that load the sound rotor's own residual line is a little taller on Ia than on the other two clamps, so a threshold that never saw Ia clips it. Worth knowing before pooling the three.

What this set does not claim

  • The healthy class is one physical rotor. So is each faulted class. Any accuracy on this data is an upper bound contaminated by rotor identity, and that is why only the binary task ships.
  • One broken bar is not in this track. Its prominence overlaps the healthy rotor's at every load, which is the well-known limit of current-signature analysis on a small machine, not a defect in the recording. Those runs are in the perception track.
  • Light loads are not in this track. Below 2.5 N.m the marks fall inside the supply line's own skirt or the gap shrinks to about a decibel. 4 load settings ship.
  • Three phases of one run are three views, not three samples. All three clamps are read and all three ship, with channel in metadata; the split is by repetition, so a run never straddles it.
  • How many bars is metadata, never the answer. broken_bars (2, 3 or 4) is recorded and is deliberately not the label.

Fields

query (119 phrasings) · image · annot (one of healthy, broken_bars) · reasoning (filled) · cate C · task T-C1 · metadata (the measured shaft rate and slip, the sideband offset, both sidebands' depth and prominence, the load, the channel, the rotor tag, the bar count, the threshold in force, the style variant, the split).

Splits: test 141, train 336.

Figures

11 drawing styles are used across the set -- colours, canvas, ticks, grid, spines, fill, marks as dashed lines or as narrow bands, label placement, font. What never varies: the curve, the plotted band of ten hertz either side of the supply line, which marks are drawn (the supply line and the first-order pair, the three the criterion reads), and the ordinate limits, pinned for the whole corpus. No threshold bar and no noise-floor line is ever drawn: the floor is the grass the reader can see, and drawing it would put half the criterion onto the evidence.

Source

IEEE broken-rotor-bar dataset, WEG W22 1CV four-pole induction motor, 50 kHz current and 7.6 kHz vibration, 20.02 s per run. Cite the upstream dataset.

Downloads last month
11