message
stringlengths
2
433k
message_type
stringclasses
2 values
message_id
int64
0
1
conversation_id
int64
113
108k
cluster
float64
12
12
__index_level_0__
int64
226
217k
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Long time ago there was a symmetric array a_1,a_2,…,a_{2n} consisting of 2n distinct integers. Array a_1,a_2,…,a_{2n} is called symmetric if for each integer 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n, there exists an integer 1 ≤ j ≤ 2n such that a_i = -a_j. For each integer 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n, Nezzar wrote down an integer d_i equal to the sum of absolute differences from a_i to all integers in a, i. e. d_i = ∑_{j = 1}^{2n} {|a_i - a_j|}. Now a million years has passed and Nezzar can barely remember the array d and totally forget a. Nezzar wonders if there exists any symmetric array a consisting of 2n distinct integers that generates the array d. Input The first line contains a single integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^5) — the number of test cases. The first line of each test case contains a single integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 10^5). The second line of each test case contains 2n integers d_1, d_2, …, d_{2n} (0 ≤ d_i ≤ 10^{12}). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases does not exceed 10^5. Output For each test case, print "YES" in a single line if there exists a possible array a. Otherwise, print "NO". You can print letters in any case (upper or lower). Example Input 6 2 8 12 8 12 2 7 7 9 11 2 7 11 7 11 1 1 1 4 40 56 48 40 80 56 80 48 6 240 154 210 162 174 154 186 240 174 186 162 210 Output YES NO NO NO NO YES Note In the first test case, a=[1,-3,-1,3] is one possible symmetric array that generates the array d=[8,12,8,12]. In the second test case, it can be shown that there is no symmetric array consisting of distinct integers that can generate array d. Submitted Solution: ``` import math YES = 'YES' NO = 'NO' MOD = 1000000007 #a = [0]*n #m = [[0] * m] * n def input_int(): return int(input()) def input_list(): return input().split(' ') def input_list_int(): return list(map(int, input_list())) def solve(): n = input_int() a = input_list_int() m = [] cmp = {} for i in range(0, 2 * n) : if a[i] not in cmp : cmp[a[i]] = 0 cmp[a[i]] += 1 if cmp[a[i]] == 2 : del cmp[a[i]] m.append(a[i]) if len(cmp) > 0 : print(NO) else : m.sort(reverse = True) delim = 2 * n last = 0 x = [] #print(m) for i in range(0, n) : m[i] -= last mul = m[i] / delim last += 2 * mul x.append(mul) delim -= 2 x.sort() has = 1 for i in range(0, n) : if x[i] <= 0 or int(x[i]) != x[i] : has = 0 if i > 0 and x[i] == x[i - 1] : has = 0 #print(x) print(YES if has == 1 else NO) query_count = input_int() while query_count: query_count -= 1 solve() ```
instruction
0
9,307
12
18,614
Yes
output
1
9,307
12
18,615
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Long time ago there was a symmetric array a_1,a_2,…,a_{2n} consisting of 2n distinct integers. Array a_1,a_2,…,a_{2n} is called symmetric if for each integer 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n, there exists an integer 1 ≤ j ≤ 2n such that a_i = -a_j. For each integer 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n, Nezzar wrote down an integer d_i equal to the sum of absolute differences from a_i to all integers in a, i. e. d_i = ∑_{j = 1}^{2n} {|a_i - a_j|}. Now a million years has passed and Nezzar can barely remember the array d and totally forget a. Nezzar wonders if there exists any symmetric array a consisting of 2n distinct integers that generates the array d. Input The first line contains a single integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^5) — the number of test cases. The first line of each test case contains a single integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 10^5). The second line of each test case contains 2n integers d_1, d_2, …, d_{2n} (0 ≤ d_i ≤ 10^{12}). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases does not exceed 10^5. Output For each test case, print "YES" in a single line if there exists a possible array a. Otherwise, print "NO". You can print letters in any case (upper or lower). Example Input 6 2 8 12 8 12 2 7 7 9 11 2 7 11 7 11 1 1 1 4 40 56 48 40 80 56 80 48 6 240 154 210 162 174 154 186 240 174 186 162 210 Output YES NO NO NO NO YES Note In the first test case, a=[1,-3,-1,3] is one possible symmetric array that generates the array d=[8,12,8,12]. In the second test case, it can be shown that there is no symmetric array consisting of distinct integers that can generate array d. Submitted Solution: ``` def isPair(a): ret = 0 for x in a: ret ^= x return ret == 0 T = int(input()) for cas in range(T): n = int(input()) a = list(map(int,input().split())) a.sort() if not isPair(a): print("NO") continue tot = 0 b = [0 for i in range(2*n+2)] fl = True for i in range(2*n,n,-1): if (a[2*(i-n)-1]-2*tot) % (2*(i-n)): fl = False break b[i] = (a[2*(i-n)-1]-2*tot) // (2*(i-n)) if b[i] <= 0: fl = False break tot += b[i] for i in range(n+1,2*n): if b[i] == b[i+1]: fl = False break print("YES" if fl else "NO") ```
instruction
0
9,308
12
18,616
Yes
output
1
9,308
12
18,617
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Long time ago there was a symmetric array a_1,a_2,…,a_{2n} consisting of 2n distinct integers. Array a_1,a_2,…,a_{2n} is called symmetric if for each integer 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n, there exists an integer 1 ≤ j ≤ 2n such that a_i = -a_j. For each integer 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n, Nezzar wrote down an integer d_i equal to the sum of absolute differences from a_i to all integers in a, i. e. d_i = ∑_{j = 1}^{2n} {|a_i - a_j|}. Now a million years has passed and Nezzar can barely remember the array d and totally forget a. Nezzar wonders if there exists any symmetric array a consisting of 2n distinct integers that generates the array d. Input The first line contains a single integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^5) — the number of test cases. The first line of each test case contains a single integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 10^5). The second line of each test case contains 2n integers d_1, d_2, …, d_{2n} (0 ≤ d_i ≤ 10^{12}). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases does not exceed 10^5. Output For each test case, print "YES" in a single line if there exists a possible array a. Otherwise, print "NO". You can print letters in any case (upper or lower). Example Input 6 2 8 12 8 12 2 7 7 9 11 2 7 11 7 11 1 1 1 4 40 56 48 40 80 56 80 48 6 240 154 210 162 174 154 186 240 174 186 162 210 Output YES NO NO NO NO YES Note In the first test case, a=[1,-3,-1,3] is one possible symmetric array that generates the array d=[8,12,8,12]. In the second test case, it can be shown that there is no symmetric array consisting of distinct integers that can generate array d. Submitted Solution: ``` def solve(): n = int(input()) arr = list(map(int, input().split())) diff = 0 arr.sort() dif = [] for a in range(1, 2 * n, 2): if arr[a] != arr[a - 1] or arr[a] % 2 != 0: print("NO") return diff = arr[a] - arr[0] dif.append(diff // 2) sdif = [2 * sum(dif)] for a in range(n - 1): sdif.append(sdif[-1] - 2 * dif[a + 1]) if arr[0] - sdif[0] >= 0: if (arr[0] - sdif[0]) % (2 * n) == 0: print("YES") else: print("NO") return for b in range(1, len(sdif)): if n == 2 * b: continue if abs(sdif[b - 1] - arr[0]) % abs(2 * n - 4 * b) == 0: if -dif[b - 1] >= ((arr[0] - sdif[b - 1]) // (2 * n - 4 * b)) >= -dif[b]: print("YES") return print("NO") return for _ in range(int(input())): solve() ```
instruction
0
9,309
12
18,618
No
output
1
9,309
12
18,619
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Long time ago there was a symmetric array a_1,a_2,…,a_{2n} consisting of 2n distinct integers. Array a_1,a_2,…,a_{2n} is called symmetric if for each integer 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n, there exists an integer 1 ≤ j ≤ 2n such that a_i = -a_j. For each integer 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n, Nezzar wrote down an integer d_i equal to the sum of absolute differences from a_i to all integers in a, i. e. d_i = ∑_{j = 1}^{2n} {|a_i - a_j|}. Now a million years has passed and Nezzar can barely remember the array d and totally forget a. Nezzar wonders if there exists any symmetric array a consisting of 2n distinct integers that generates the array d. Input The first line contains a single integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^5) — the number of test cases. The first line of each test case contains a single integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 10^5). The second line of each test case contains 2n integers d_1, d_2, …, d_{2n} (0 ≤ d_i ≤ 10^{12}). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases does not exceed 10^5. Output For each test case, print "YES" in a single line if there exists a possible array a. Otherwise, print "NO". You can print letters in any case (upper or lower). Example Input 6 2 8 12 8 12 2 7 7 9 11 2 7 11 7 11 1 1 1 4 40 56 48 40 80 56 80 48 6 240 154 210 162 174 154 186 240 174 186 162 210 Output YES NO NO NO NO YES Note In the first test case, a=[1,-3,-1,3] is one possible symmetric array that generates the array d=[8,12,8,12]. In the second test case, it can be shown that there is no symmetric array consisting of distinct integers that can generate array d. Submitted Solution: ``` def solve(n, s): counter = 0 for i in range(2*n): if s[i] % 8 == 0: counter += 1 if s[i] % 2 or s.count(s[i]) % 2: return "No" if counter > n: return "No" return "Yes" for _ in range(int(input())): n = int(input()) s = list(map(int, input().split())) print(solve(n, s)) ```
instruction
0
9,310
12
18,620
No
output
1
9,310
12
18,621
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Long time ago there was a symmetric array a_1,a_2,…,a_{2n} consisting of 2n distinct integers. Array a_1,a_2,…,a_{2n} is called symmetric if for each integer 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n, there exists an integer 1 ≤ j ≤ 2n such that a_i = -a_j. For each integer 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n, Nezzar wrote down an integer d_i equal to the sum of absolute differences from a_i to all integers in a, i. e. d_i = ∑_{j = 1}^{2n} {|a_i - a_j|}. Now a million years has passed and Nezzar can barely remember the array d and totally forget a. Nezzar wonders if there exists any symmetric array a consisting of 2n distinct integers that generates the array d. Input The first line contains a single integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^5) — the number of test cases. The first line of each test case contains a single integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 10^5). The second line of each test case contains 2n integers d_1, d_2, …, d_{2n} (0 ≤ d_i ≤ 10^{12}). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases does not exceed 10^5. Output For each test case, print "YES" in a single line if there exists a possible array a. Otherwise, print "NO". You can print letters in any case (upper or lower). Example Input 6 2 8 12 8 12 2 7 7 9 11 2 7 11 7 11 1 1 1 4 40 56 48 40 80 56 80 48 6 240 154 210 162 174 154 186 240 174 186 162 210 Output YES NO NO NO NO YES Note In the first test case, a=[1,-3,-1,3] is one possible symmetric array that generates the array d=[8,12,8,12]. In the second test case, it can be shown that there is no symmetric array consisting of distinct integers that can generate array d. Submitted Solution: ``` for _ in range(int(input())): n = int(input()) p = list(map(int,input().split())) d = {} for i in p: if i not in d: d[i] = 1 else: d[i]+=1 f2 = 0 for i in d: if d[i]%2==1: f2 = 1 for i in p: if i%2==1: f2 = 1 if f2: print("NO") else: arr = list(set(p)) arr.sort(reverse=True) prev_sum = 0 flag = True # print(arr) s = set() for i in arr: num = (i - prev_sum) den = 2*(n) curr = num//den if num<=0: flag = False break if num%den!=0: flag = False break if curr not in s: s.add(curr) else: flag = False break n-=1 prev_sum += 2*curr if flag: print("YES") else: print("NO") ```
instruction
0
9,311
12
18,622
No
output
1
9,311
12
18,623
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. Long time ago there was a symmetric array a_1,a_2,…,a_{2n} consisting of 2n distinct integers. Array a_1,a_2,…,a_{2n} is called symmetric if for each integer 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n, there exists an integer 1 ≤ j ≤ 2n such that a_i = -a_j. For each integer 1 ≤ i ≤ 2n, Nezzar wrote down an integer d_i equal to the sum of absolute differences from a_i to all integers in a, i. e. d_i = ∑_{j = 1}^{2n} {|a_i - a_j|}. Now a million years has passed and Nezzar can barely remember the array d and totally forget a. Nezzar wonders if there exists any symmetric array a consisting of 2n distinct integers that generates the array d. Input The first line contains a single integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^5) — the number of test cases. The first line of each test case contains a single integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 10^5). The second line of each test case contains 2n integers d_1, d_2, …, d_{2n} (0 ≤ d_i ≤ 10^{12}). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases does not exceed 10^5. Output For each test case, print "YES" in a single line if there exists a possible array a. Otherwise, print "NO". You can print letters in any case (upper or lower). Example Input 6 2 8 12 8 12 2 7 7 9 11 2 7 11 7 11 1 1 1 4 40 56 48 40 80 56 80 48 6 240 154 210 162 174 154 186 240 174 186 162 210 Output YES NO NO NO NO YES Note In the first test case, a=[1,-3,-1,3] is one possible symmetric array that generates the array d=[8,12,8,12]. In the second test case, it can be shown that there is no symmetric array consisting of distinct integers that can generate array d. Submitted Solution: ``` for _ in range(int(input())): n = int(input()) d = list(map(int, input().split())) if sum(d) %4 == 0: print('YES') else: print('NO') ```
instruction
0
9,312
12
18,624
No
output
1
9,312
12
18,625
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. To AmShZ, all arrays are equal, but some arrays are more-equal than others. Specifically, the arrays consisting of n elements from 1 to n that can be turned into permutations of numbers from 1 to n by adding a non-negative integer to each element. Mashtali who wants to appear in every problem statement thinks that an array b consisting of k elements is compatible with a more-equal array a consisting of n elements if for each 1 ≤ i ≤ k we have 1 ≤ b_i ≤ n and also a_{b_1} = a_{b_2} = … = a_{b_k}. Find the number of pairs of arrays a and b such that a is a more-equal array consisting of n elements and b is an array compatible with a consisting of k elements modulo 998244353. Note that the elements of b are not necessarily distinct, same holds for a. Input The first line of input contains two integers n and k (1 ≤ n ≤ 10^9 , 1 ≤ k ≤ 10^5). Output Print a single integer — the answer to the problem modulo 998244353. Examples Input 1 1 Output 1 Input 2 2 Output 8 Input 5 4 Output 50400 Input 20 100 Output 807645526 Input 10000000 10000 Output 883232350 Note There are eight possible pairs for the second example: 1. a = \{1, 1\}, b = \{1, 1\} 2. a = \{1, 1\}, b = \{1, 2\} 3. a = \{1, 1\}, b = \{2, 1\} 4. a = \{1, 1\}, b = \{2, 2\} 5. a = \{1, 2\}, b = \{1, 1\} 6. a = \{1, 2\}, b = \{2, 2\} 7. a = \{2, 1\}, b = \{1, 1\} 8. a = \{2, 1\}, b = \{2, 2\} Submitted Solution: ``` def build_maxheap(A): n=len(A) i=n//2 while(i>=1): min_heapify(A,i) i=i-1 return A ```
instruction
0
9,329
12
18,658
No
output
1
9,329
12
18,659
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. To AmShZ, all arrays are equal, but some arrays are more-equal than others. Specifically, the arrays consisting of n elements from 1 to n that can be turned into permutations of numbers from 1 to n by adding a non-negative integer to each element. Mashtali who wants to appear in every problem statement thinks that an array b consisting of k elements is compatible with a more-equal array a consisting of n elements if for each 1 ≤ i ≤ k we have 1 ≤ b_i ≤ n and also a_{b_1} = a_{b_2} = … = a_{b_k}. Find the number of pairs of arrays a and b such that a is a more-equal array consisting of n elements and b is an array compatible with a consisting of k elements modulo 998244353. Note that the elements of b are not necessarily distinct, same holds for a. Input The first line of input contains two integers n and k (1 ≤ n ≤ 10^9 , 1 ≤ k ≤ 10^5). Output Print a single integer — the answer to the problem modulo 998244353. Examples Input 1 1 Output 1 Input 2 2 Output 8 Input 5 4 Output 50400 Input 20 100 Output 807645526 Input 10000000 10000 Output 883232350 Note There are eight possible pairs for the second example: 1. a = \{1, 1\}, b = \{1, 1\} 2. a = \{1, 1\}, b = \{1, 2\} 3. a = \{1, 1\}, b = \{2, 1\} 4. a = \{1, 1\}, b = \{2, 2\} 5. a = \{1, 2\}, b = \{1, 1\} 6. a = \{1, 2\}, b = \{2, 2\} 7. a = \{2, 1\}, b = \{1, 1\} 8. a = \{2, 1\}, b = \{2, 2\} Submitted Solution: ``` print(1) ```
instruction
0
9,330
12
18,660
No
output
1
9,330
12
18,661
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Once at a team training Vasya, Petya and Sasha got a problem on implementing linear search in an array. According to the boys, linear search works as follows. The array elements in a pre-selected order are in turn compared with the number that you need to find. Once you find the array element that is equal to the required one, the search ends. The efficiency of the algorithm is the number of performed comparisons. The fewer comparisons the linear search has made, the more effective it is. Vasya believes that a linear search would work better if it sequentially iterates through the elements, starting with the 1-st one (in this problem we consider the elements of the array indexed from 1 to n) and ending with the n-th one. And Petya says that Vasya is wrong: the search will need less comparisons if it sequentially iterates the elements starting from the n-th and ending with the 1-st one. Sasha argues that the two approaches are equivalent. To finally begin the task, the teammates decided to settle the debate and compare the two approaches on an example. For this, they took an array that is a permutation of integers from 1 to n, and generated m queries of the form: find element with value bi in the array. They want to calculate for both approaches how many comparisons in total the linear search will need to respond to all queries. If the first search needs fewer comparisons, then the winner of the dispute is Vasya. If the second one does, then the winner is Petya. If both approaches make the same number of comparisons, then Sasha's got the upper hand. But the problem is, linear search is too slow. That's why the boys aren't going to find out who is right before the end of the training, unless you come in here. Help them to determine who will win the dispute. Input The first line contains integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 105) — the number of elements in the array. The second line contains n distinct space-separated integers a1, a2, ..., an (1 ≤ ai ≤ n) — the elements of array. The third line contains integer m (1 ≤ m ≤ 105) — the number of queries. The last line contains m space-separated integers b1, b2, ..., bm (1 ≤ bi ≤ n) — the search queries. Note that the queries can repeat. Output Print two integers, showing how many comparisons Vasya's approach needs and how many comparisons Petya's approach needs. Separate the numbers by spaces. Please, do not use the %lld specifier to read or write 64-bit integers in С++. It is preferred to use cin, cout streams or the %I64d specifier. Examples Input 2 1 2 1 1 Output 1 2 Input 2 2 1 1 1 Output 2 1 Input 3 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Output 6 6 Note In the first sample Vasya's approach will make one comparison (it starts with the 1-st element and immediately finds the required number), and Petya's approach makes two comparisons (first he compares with the 2-nd array element, doesn't find the search item and compares with the 1-st element). In the second sample, on the contrary, Vasya's approach will need two comparisons (first with 1-st element, and then with the 2-nd), and Petya's approach will find the required value in one comparison (the first comparison with the 2-nd element).
instruction
0
9,364
12
18,728
Tags: implementation Correct Solution: ``` from collections import defaultdict def main(): n = int(input()) a = [int(c) for c in input().split()] m = int(input()) q = [int(c) for c in input().split()] cache = defaultdict(list) for i, e in enumerate(a): cache[e].append(i) a = b = 0 for e in q: a += cache[e][0] + 1 b += n - cache[e][-1] print(a, b) if __name__ == '__main__': main() ```
output
1
9,364
12
18,729
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Once at a team training Vasya, Petya and Sasha got a problem on implementing linear search in an array. According to the boys, linear search works as follows. The array elements in a pre-selected order are in turn compared with the number that you need to find. Once you find the array element that is equal to the required one, the search ends. The efficiency of the algorithm is the number of performed comparisons. The fewer comparisons the linear search has made, the more effective it is. Vasya believes that a linear search would work better if it sequentially iterates through the elements, starting with the 1-st one (in this problem we consider the elements of the array indexed from 1 to n) and ending with the n-th one. And Petya says that Vasya is wrong: the search will need less comparisons if it sequentially iterates the elements starting from the n-th and ending with the 1-st one. Sasha argues that the two approaches are equivalent. To finally begin the task, the teammates decided to settle the debate and compare the two approaches on an example. For this, they took an array that is a permutation of integers from 1 to n, and generated m queries of the form: find element with value bi in the array. They want to calculate for both approaches how many comparisons in total the linear search will need to respond to all queries. If the first search needs fewer comparisons, then the winner of the dispute is Vasya. If the second one does, then the winner is Petya. If both approaches make the same number of comparisons, then Sasha's got the upper hand. But the problem is, linear search is too slow. That's why the boys aren't going to find out who is right before the end of the training, unless you come in here. Help them to determine who will win the dispute. Input The first line contains integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 105) — the number of elements in the array. The second line contains n distinct space-separated integers a1, a2, ..., an (1 ≤ ai ≤ n) — the elements of array. The third line contains integer m (1 ≤ m ≤ 105) — the number of queries. The last line contains m space-separated integers b1, b2, ..., bm (1 ≤ bi ≤ n) — the search queries. Note that the queries can repeat. Output Print two integers, showing how many comparisons Vasya's approach needs and how many comparisons Petya's approach needs. Separate the numbers by spaces. Please, do not use the %lld specifier to read or write 64-bit integers in С++. It is preferred to use cin, cout streams or the %I64d specifier. Examples Input 2 1 2 1 1 Output 1 2 Input 2 2 1 1 1 Output 2 1 Input 3 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Output 6 6 Note In the first sample Vasya's approach will make one comparison (it starts with the 1-st element and immediately finds the required number), and Petya's approach makes two comparisons (first he compares with the 2-nd array element, doesn't find the search item and compares with the 1-st element). In the second sample, on the contrary, Vasya's approach will need two comparisons (first with 1-st element, and then with the 2-nd), and Petya's approach will find the required value in one comparison (the first comparison with the 2-nd element).
instruction
0
9,365
12
18,730
Tags: implementation Correct Solution: ``` n=int(input()) x=list(map(int,input().split())) d={} for i,j in enumerate(x): d[j]=i a,b=0,0 q=int(input()) r=list(map(int,input().split())) for i in r: a+=d[i]+1 b+=n-d[i] print(a,b) ```
output
1
9,365
12
18,731
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Once at a team training Vasya, Petya and Sasha got a problem on implementing linear search in an array. According to the boys, linear search works as follows. The array elements in a pre-selected order are in turn compared with the number that you need to find. Once you find the array element that is equal to the required one, the search ends. The efficiency of the algorithm is the number of performed comparisons. The fewer comparisons the linear search has made, the more effective it is. Vasya believes that a linear search would work better if it sequentially iterates through the elements, starting with the 1-st one (in this problem we consider the elements of the array indexed from 1 to n) and ending with the n-th one. And Petya says that Vasya is wrong: the search will need less comparisons if it sequentially iterates the elements starting from the n-th and ending with the 1-st one. Sasha argues that the two approaches are equivalent. To finally begin the task, the teammates decided to settle the debate and compare the two approaches on an example. For this, they took an array that is a permutation of integers from 1 to n, and generated m queries of the form: find element with value bi in the array. They want to calculate for both approaches how many comparisons in total the linear search will need to respond to all queries. If the first search needs fewer comparisons, then the winner of the dispute is Vasya. If the second one does, then the winner is Petya. If both approaches make the same number of comparisons, then Sasha's got the upper hand. But the problem is, linear search is too slow. That's why the boys aren't going to find out who is right before the end of the training, unless you come in here. Help them to determine who will win the dispute. Input The first line contains integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 105) — the number of elements in the array. The second line contains n distinct space-separated integers a1, a2, ..., an (1 ≤ ai ≤ n) — the elements of array. The third line contains integer m (1 ≤ m ≤ 105) — the number of queries. The last line contains m space-separated integers b1, b2, ..., bm (1 ≤ bi ≤ n) — the search queries. Note that the queries can repeat. Output Print two integers, showing how many comparisons Vasya's approach needs and how many comparisons Petya's approach needs. Separate the numbers by spaces. Please, do not use the %lld specifier to read or write 64-bit integers in С++. It is preferred to use cin, cout streams or the %I64d specifier. Examples Input 2 1 2 1 1 Output 1 2 Input 2 2 1 1 1 Output 2 1 Input 3 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Output 6 6 Note In the first sample Vasya's approach will make one comparison (it starts with the 1-st element and immediately finds the required number), and Petya's approach makes two comparisons (first he compares with the 2-nd array element, doesn't find the search item and compares with the 1-st element). In the second sample, on the contrary, Vasya's approach will need two comparisons (first with 1-st element, and then with the 2-nd), and Petya's approach will find the required value in one comparison (the first comparison with the 2-nd element).
instruction
0
9,366
12
18,732
Tags: implementation Correct Solution: ``` n = int(input()) a = list(map(int, input().split())) m = int(input()) b = list(map(int, input().split())) res = [0, 0] l = [0 for _ in range(max(a) + 1)] for i, v in enumerate(a): l[v] = i+1 for v in b: res[0] += l[v] res[1] += n+1-l[v] print(*res) ```
output
1
9,366
12
18,733
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Once at a team training Vasya, Petya and Sasha got a problem on implementing linear search in an array. According to the boys, linear search works as follows. The array elements in a pre-selected order are in turn compared with the number that you need to find. Once you find the array element that is equal to the required one, the search ends. The efficiency of the algorithm is the number of performed comparisons. The fewer comparisons the linear search has made, the more effective it is. Vasya believes that a linear search would work better if it sequentially iterates through the elements, starting with the 1-st one (in this problem we consider the elements of the array indexed from 1 to n) and ending with the n-th one. And Petya says that Vasya is wrong: the search will need less comparisons if it sequentially iterates the elements starting from the n-th and ending with the 1-st one. Sasha argues that the two approaches are equivalent. To finally begin the task, the teammates decided to settle the debate and compare the two approaches on an example. For this, they took an array that is a permutation of integers from 1 to n, and generated m queries of the form: find element with value bi in the array. They want to calculate for both approaches how many comparisons in total the linear search will need to respond to all queries. If the first search needs fewer comparisons, then the winner of the dispute is Vasya. If the second one does, then the winner is Petya. If both approaches make the same number of comparisons, then Sasha's got the upper hand. But the problem is, linear search is too slow. That's why the boys aren't going to find out who is right before the end of the training, unless you come in here. Help them to determine who will win the dispute. Input The first line contains integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 105) — the number of elements in the array. The second line contains n distinct space-separated integers a1, a2, ..., an (1 ≤ ai ≤ n) — the elements of array. The third line contains integer m (1 ≤ m ≤ 105) — the number of queries. The last line contains m space-separated integers b1, b2, ..., bm (1 ≤ bi ≤ n) — the search queries. Note that the queries can repeat. Output Print two integers, showing how many comparisons Vasya's approach needs and how many comparisons Petya's approach needs. Separate the numbers by spaces. Please, do not use the %lld specifier to read or write 64-bit integers in С++. It is preferred to use cin, cout streams or the %I64d specifier. Examples Input 2 1 2 1 1 Output 1 2 Input 2 2 1 1 1 Output 2 1 Input 3 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Output 6 6 Note In the first sample Vasya's approach will make one comparison (it starts with the 1-st element and immediately finds the required number), and Petya's approach makes two comparisons (first he compares with the 2-nd array element, doesn't find the search item and compares with the 1-st element). In the second sample, on the contrary, Vasya's approach will need two comparisons (first with 1-st element, and then with the 2-nd), and Petya's approach will find the required value in one comparison (the first comparison with the 2-nd element).
instruction
0
9,367
12
18,734
Tags: implementation Correct Solution: ``` n = int(input()) a = {} for i,j in enumerate(input().split()): a[j] = i+1 m = int(input()) x, y = 0, 0 for i in input().split(): z = a[i] x += z y += n-z+1 print(x,y) ```
output
1
9,367
12
18,735
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Once at a team training Vasya, Petya and Sasha got a problem on implementing linear search in an array. According to the boys, linear search works as follows. The array elements in a pre-selected order are in turn compared with the number that you need to find. Once you find the array element that is equal to the required one, the search ends. The efficiency of the algorithm is the number of performed comparisons. The fewer comparisons the linear search has made, the more effective it is. Vasya believes that a linear search would work better if it sequentially iterates through the elements, starting with the 1-st one (in this problem we consider the elements of the array indexed from 1 to n) and ending with the n-th one. And Petya says that Vasya is wrong: the search will need less comparisons if it sequentially iterates the elements starting from the n-th and ending with the 1-st one. Sasha argues that the two approaches are equivalent. To finally begin the task, the teammates decided to settle the debate and compare the two approaches on an example. For this, they took an array that is a permutation of integers from 1 to n, and generated m queries of the form: find element with value bi in the array. They want to calculate for both approaches how many comparisons in total the linear search will need to respond to all queries. If the first search needs fewer comparisons, then the winner of the dispute is Vasya. If the second one does, then the winner is Petya. If both approaches make the same number of comparisons, then Sasha's got the upper hand. But the problem is, linear search is too slow. That's why the boys aren't going to find out who is right before the end of the training, unless you come in here. Help them to determine who will win the dispute. Input The first line contains integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 105) — the number of elements in the array. The second line contains n distinct space-separated integers a1, a2, ..., an (1 ≤ ai ≤ n) — the elements of array. The third line contains integer m (1 ≤ m ≤ 105) — the number of queries. The last line contains m space-separated integers b1, b2, ..., bm (1 ≤ bi ≤ n) — the search queries. Note that the queries can repeat. Output Print two integers, showing how many comparisons Vasya's approach needs and how many comparisons Petya's approach needs. Separate the numbers by spaces. Please, do not use the %lld specifier to read or write 64-bit integers in С++. It is preferred to use cin, cout streams or the %I64d specifier. Examples Input 2 1 2 1 1 Output 1 2 Input 2 2 1 1 1 Output 2 1 Input 3 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Output 6 6 Note In the first sample Vasya's approach will make one comparison (it starts with the 1-st element and immediately finds the required number), and Petya's approach makes two comparisons (first he compares with the 2-nd array element, doesn't find the search item and compares with the 1-st element). In the second sample, on the contrary, Vasya's approach will need two comparisons (first with 1-st element, and then with the 2-nd), and Petya's approach will find the required value in one comparison (the first comparison with the 2-nd element).
instruction
0
9,368
12
18,736
Tags: implementation Correct Solution: ``` # end=mid-1 # else: # start=mid+1 n=int(input()) arr=list(map(int,input().split())) q=int(input()) qar=list(map(int,input().split())) a=0 b=0 d={} for i in range(n): d[arr[i]]=i+1 arr.sort() for i in range(q): idx=d[qar[i]] a+=idx b+=(n-idx)+1 print(a,b) ```
output
1
9,368
12
18,737
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Once at a team training Vasya, Petya and Sasha got a problem on implementing linear search in an array. According to the boys, linear search works as follows. The array elements in a pre-selected order are in turn compared with the number that you need to find. Once you find the array element that is equal to the required one, the search ends. The efficiency of the algorithm is the number of performed comparisons. The fewer comparisons the linear search has made, the more effective it is. Vasya believes that a linear search would work better if it sequentially iterates through the elements, starting with the 1-st one (in this problem we consider the elements of the array indexed from 1 to n) and ending with the n-th one. And Petya says that Vasya is wrong: the search will need less comparisons if it sequentially iterates the elements starting from the n-th and ending with the 1-st one. Sasha argues that the two approaches are equivalent. To finally begin the task, the teammates decided to settle the debate and compare the two approaches on an example. For this, they took an array that is a permutation of integers from 1 to n, and generated m queries of the form: find element with value bi in the array. They want to calculate for both approaches how many comparisons in total the linear search will need to respond to all queries. If the first search needs fewer comparisons, then the winner of the dispute is Vasya. If the second one does, then the winner is Petya. If both approaches make the same number of comparisons, then Sasha's got the upper hand. But the problem is, linear search is too slow. That's why the boys aren't going to find out who is right before the end of the training, unless you come in here. Help them to determine who will win the dispute. Input The first line contains integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 105) — the number of elements in the array. The second line contains n distinct space-separated integers a1, a2, ..., an (1 ≤ ai ≤ n) — the elements of array. The third line contains integer m (1 ≤ m ≤ 105) — the number of queries. The last line contains m space-separated integers b1, b2, ..., bm (1 ≤ bi ≤ n) — the search queries. Note that the queries can repeat. Output Print two integers, showing how many comparisons Vasya's approach needs and how many comparisons Petya's approach needs. Separate the numbers by spaces. Please, do not use the %lld specifier to read or write 64-bit integers in С++. It is preferred to use cin, cout streams or the %I64d specifier. Examples Input 2 1 2 1 1 Output 1 2 Input 2 2 1 1 1 Output 2 1 Input 3 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Output 6 6 Note In the first sample Vasya's approach will make one comparison (it starts with the 1-st element and immediately finds the required number), and Petya's approach makes two comparisons (first he compares with the 2-nd array element, doesn't find the search item and compares with the 1-st element). In the second sample, on the contrary, Vasya's approach will need two comparisons (first with 1-st element, and then with the 2-nd), and Petya's approach will find the required value in one comparison (the first comparison with the 2-nd element).
instruction
0
9,369
12
18,738
Tags: implementation Correct Solution: ``` def approach(n, ans): global a, ind, b, m for i in range(m): ans[0] += ind[b[i]]+1 ans[1] += len(a)-ind[b[i]] return ans n = int(input()) a = list(map(int, input().split())) m = int(input()) b = list(map(int, input().split())) ind = [0]*(len(a)+1) for i in range(len(a)): ind[a[i]] = i ans = [0, 0] #print(ind) ans = approach(n, ans) print(*ans) ```
output
1
9,369
12
18,739
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Once at a team training Vasya, Petya and Sasha got a problem on implementing linear search in an array. According to the boys, linear search works as follows. The array elements in a pre-selected order are in turn compared with the number that you need to find. Once you find the array element that is equal to the required one, the search ends. The efficiency of the algorithm is the number of performed comparisons. The fewer comparisons the linear search has made, the more effective it is. Vasya believes that a linear search would work better if it sequentially iterates through the elements, starting with the 1-st one (in this problem we consider the elements of the array indexed from 1 to n) and ending with the n-th one. And Petya says that Vasya is wrong: the search will need less comparisons if it sequentially iterates the elements starting from the n-th and ending with the 1-st one. Sasha argues that the two approaches are equivalent. To finally begin the task, the teammates decided to settle the debate and compare the two approaches on an example. For this, they took an array that is a permutation of integers from 1 to n, and generated m queries of the form: find element with value bi in the array. They want to calculate for both approaches how many comparisons in total the linear search will need to respond to all queries. If the first search needs fewer comparisons, then the winner of the dispute is Vasya. If the second one does, then the winner is Petya. If both approaches make the same number of comparisons, then Sasha's got the upper hand. But the problem is, linear search is too slow. That's why the boys aren't going to find out who is right before the end of the training, unless you come in here. Help them to determine who will win the dispute. Input The first line contains integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 105) — the number of elements in the array. The second line contains n distinct space-separated integers a1, a2, ..., an (1 ≤ ai ≤ n) — the elements of array. The third line contains integer m (1 ≤ m ≤ 105) — the number of queries. The last line contains m space-separated integers b1, b2, ..., bm (1 ≤ bi ≤ n) — the search queries. Note that the queries can repeat. Output Print two integers, showing how many comparisons Vasya's approach needs and how many comparisons Petya's approach needs. Separate the numbers by spaces. Please, do not use the %lld specifier to read or write 64-bit integers in С++. It is preferred to use cin, cout streams or the %I64d specifier. Examples Input 2 1 2 1 1 Output 1 2 Input 2 2 1 1 1 Output 2 1 Input 3 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Output 6 6 Note In the first sample Vasya's approach will make one comparison (it starts with the 1-st element and immediately finds the required number), and Petya's approach makes two comparisons (first he compares with the 2-nd array element, doesn't find the search item and compares with the 1-st element). In the second sample, on the contrary, Vasya's approach will need two comparisons (first with 1-st element, and then with the 2-nd), and Petya's approach will find the required value in one comparison (the first comparison with the 2-nd element).
instruction
0
9,370
12
18,740
Tags: implementation Correct Solution: ``` n = int(input()) arr = list(map(int, input().split())) size = 1_000_05 freq = [None] * size freq2 = [None] * size index = 0 for element in arr: freq[element] = index + 1 freq2[element] = n - index index = index + 1 m = int(input()) first = second = 0 queries = list(map(int, input().split())) for query in queries: first = first + freq[query] second = second + freq2[query] print(first, end =' ') print(second, end ='') ```
output
1
9,370
12
18,741
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Once at a team training Vasya, Petya and Sasha got a problem on implementing linear search in an array. According to the boys, linear search works as follows. The array elements in a pre-selected order are in turn compared with the number that you need to find. Once you find the array element that is equal to the required one, the search ends. The efficiency of the algorithm is the number of performed comparisons. The fewer comparisons the linear search has made, the more effective it is. Vasya believes that a linear search would work better if it sequentially iterates through the elements, starting with the 1-st one (in this problem we consider the elements of the array indexed from 1 to n) and ending with the n-th one. And Petya says that Vasya is wrong: the search will need less comparisons if it sequentially iterates the elements starting from the n-th and ending with the 1-st one. Sasha argues that the two approaches are equivalent. To finally begin the task, the teammates decided to settle the debate and compare the two approaches on an example. For this, they took an array that is a permutation of integers from 1 to n, and generated m queries of the form: find element with value bi in the array. They want to calculate for both approaches how many comparisons in total the linear search will need to respond to all queries. If the first search needs fewer comparisons, then the winner of the dispute is Vasya. If the second one does, then the winner is Petya. If both approaches make the same number of comparisons, then Sasha's got the upper hand. But the problem is, linear search is too slow. That's why the boys aren't going to find out who is right before the end of the training, unless you come in here. Help them to determine who will win the dispute. Input The first line contains integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 105) — the number of elements in the array. The second line contains n distinct space-separated integers a1, a2, ..., an (1 ≤ ai ≤ n) — the elements of array. The third line contains integer m (1 ≤ m ≤ 105) — the number of queries. The last line contains m space-separated integers b1, b2, ..., bm (1 ≤ bi ≤ n) — the search queries. Note that the queries can repeat. Output Print two integers, showing how many comparisons Vasya's approach needs and how many comparisons Petya's approach needs. Separate the numbers by spaces. Please, do not use the %lld specifier to read or write 64-bit integers in С++. It is preferred to use cin, cout streams or the %I64d specifier. Examples Input 2 1 2 1 1 Output 1 2 Input 2 2 1 1 1 Output 2 1 Input 3 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Output 6 6 Note In the first sample Vasya's approach will make one comparison (it starts with the 1-st element and immediately finds the required number), and Petya's approach makes two comparisons (first he compares with the 2-nd array element, doesn't find the search item and compares with the 1-st element). In the second sample, on the contrary, Vasya's approach will need two comparisons (first with 1-st element, and then with the 2-nd), and Petya's approach will find the required value in one comparison (the first comparison with the 2-nd element).
instruction
0
9,371
12
18,742
Tags: implementation Correct Solution: ``` '''n = int(input()) arr = list(map(int, input().split())) nn = int(input()) arr3 = list(map(int, input().split())) cv = 0 cp = 0 for kk in arr3: xxx = arr.index(kk) cv += xxx + 1 cp += n - xxx print(cv, cp)''' n = int(input()) a = [int(x) for x in input().split()] m = int(input()) b = [int(x) for x in input().split()] c = 0 d = 0 w = {} for i in range(n): w[a[i]] = i for j in b: q = w[j] c += (q+1) d += (n-q) print(c, d) #print(w) ```
output
1
9,371
12
18,743
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an integer m. Let M = 2m - 1. You are also given a set of n integers denoted as the set T. The integers will be provided in base 2 as n binary strings of length m. A set of integers S is called "good" if the following hold. 1. If <image>, then <image>. 2. If <image>, then <image> 3. <image> 4. All elements of S are less than or equal to M. Here, <image> and <image> refer to the bitwise XOR and bitwise AND operators, respectively. Count the number of good sets S, modulo 109 + 7. Input The first line will contain two integers m and n (1 ≤ m ≤ 1 000, 1 ≤ n ≤ min(2m, 50)). The next n lines will contain the elements of T. Each line will contain exactly m zeros and ones. Elements of T will be distinct. Output Print a single integer, the number of good sets modulo 109 + 7. Examples Input 5 3 11010 00101 11000 Output 4 Input 30 2 010101010101010010101010101010 110110110110110011011011011011 Output 860616440 Note An example of a valid set S is {00000, 00101, 00010, 00111, 11000, 11010, 11101, 11111}.
instruction
0
9,632
12
19,264
Tags: bitmasks, combinatorics, dp, math Correct Solution: ``` #Problem Set E: Collaborated with no one from collections import defaultdict mod_v = 1000000007 temp_arr = [[1]] for i in range(1,1010): a = [1] for k in range(1,i): a.append((temp_arr[i-1][k-1]+temp_arr[i-1][k]) % mod_v) a.append(1) temp_arr.append(a) ans_arr = [1] for i in range(1,1010): res = 0 for j in range(i): res += ans_arr[j] * temp_arr[i-1][j] res %= mod_v ans_arr.append(res) n_list=list(map(int, input().split())) n = n_list[0] lines = n_list[1] new_list = [0 for __ in range(n)] for i in range(lines): input1 = list(map(int, input())) for k in range(n): new_list[k] |= input1[k] << i default_d = defaultdict(int) for k in new_list: default_d[k] += 1 answer = 1 for n in default_d.values(): answer = answer * ans_arr[n] % mod_v print(answer) ```
output
1
9,632
12
19,265
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0.
instruction
0
9,972
12
19,944
Tags: brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, dp, greedy Correct Solution: ``` def go(): n, x = map(int, input().split(' ')) a = [int(i) for i in input().split(' ')] cur1 = cur2 = cur = maximum = 0 for i in range(len(a)): cur1 = max(0, cur1 + a[i]) cur2 = max(cur1, cur2 + x * a[i]) cur = max(cur + a[i], cur2) maximum = max(maximum, cur) return maximum print(go()) ```
output
1
9,972
12
19,945
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0.
instruction
0
9,973
12
19,946
Tags: brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, dp, greedy Correct Solution: ``` import sys,math,itertools from collections import Counter,deque,defaultdict from bisect import bisect_left,bisect_right from heapq import heappop,heappush,heapify, nlargest from copy import deepcopy mod = 10**9+7 INF = float('inf') def inp(): return int(sys.stdin.readline()) def inpl(): return list(map(int, sys.stdin.readline().split())) def inpl_1(): return list(map(lambda x:int(x)-1, sys.stdin.readline().split())) n,X = inpl() a = inpl() dp = [[0]*(n+1) for _ in range(5)] for i in range(n): for j in range(5): tmp = 0 if j == 1 or j == 3: tmp = a[i] elif j == 2: tmp = a[i]*X for k in range(j+1): dp[j][i+1] = max(dp[j][i+1], dp[k][i]+tmp) res = -INF for i in range(5): res = max(res, dp[i][-1]) print(res) ```
output
1
9,973
12
19,947
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0.
instruction
0
9,974
12
19,948
Tags: brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, dp, greedy Correct Solution: ``` n, x = map(int, input().split()) a = list(map(int, input().split())) kq=pre=mid=suf=0 for i in a: pre=max(pre+i,0) mid=max(mid+(i*x),pre) suf=max(suf+i,mid) kq = max(kq, suf) print(kq) ```
output
1
9,974
12
19,949
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0.
instruction
0
9,975
12
19,950
Tags: brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, dp, greedy Correct Solution: ``` n, x = map(int, input().split()) a = list(map(int, input().split())) inf = - 2**64 dp = [[[inf for _ in range(3)] for _ in range(3)] for _ in range(n+1)] dp[0][0][0] = 0 for i in range(n+1): for j in range(3): for k in range(3): if k < 2: dp[i][j][k+1] = max(dp[i][j][k+1], dp[i][j][k]) if j < 2: dp[i][j+1][k] = max(dp[i][j+1][k], dp[i][j][k]) if i < n: dp[i + 1][j][k] = max(dp[i + 1][j][k], dp[i][j][k] + (a[i] if j == 1 else 0) * int(x if k == 1 else 1)) print(dp[n][2][2]) ```
output
1
9,975
12
19,951
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0.
instruction
0
9,976
12
19,952
Tags: brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, dp, greedy Correct Solution: ``` import sys,math from collections import defaultdict,deque input=sys.stdin.readline n,x=map(int,input().split()) l=list(map(int,input().split())) dp=[[[0 for _ in range(2)] for _ in range(2)] for _ in range(len(l))] #print(dp) #index in l,is usable or not,is in use or not dp[0][0][0]=l[0] dp[0][1][0]=l[0] dp[0][1][1]=x*l[0] ans=max(l[0],l[0]*x,0) for i in range(1,n): dp[i][0][0]=max(l[i],l[i]+max(dp[i-1][0][0],dp[i-1][1][1])) dp[i][1][0]=max(l[i],l[i]+dp[i-1][1][0]) dp[i][1][1]=max(l[i]*x,l[i]*x+max(dp[i-1][1][1],dp[i-1][1][0])) ans=max(ans,dp[i][0][0],dp[i][1][0],dp[i][1][1]) print(ans) ```
output
1
9,976
12
19,953
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0.
instruction
0
9,977
12
19,954
Tags: brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, dp, greedy Correct Solution: ``` n, x = map(int, input().split()) a = list(map(int, input().split())) dp = [[0 for _ in range(n + 1)] for _ in range(3)] ans = 0 for i in range(n): dp[0][i + 1] = max(0, dp[0][i] + a[i]) dp[1][i + 1] = max(dp[0][i], dp[1][i]) + a[i] * x dp[2][i + 1] = max(dp[0][i], dp[1][i], dp[2][i]) + a[i] ans = max(ans, dp[0][i + 1], dp[1][i + 1], dp[2][i + 1]) print(ans) ```
output
1
9,977
12
19,955
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0.
instruction
0
9,978
12
19,956
Tags: brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, dp, greedy Correct Solution: ``` from math import * from collections import * import sys sys.setrecursionlimit(10**9) n,x = map(int,input().split()) a = list(map(int,input().split())) l = [0 for i in range(n+1)] r = [0 for i in range(n+1)] pre = [a[0]] for i in range(1,n): pre.append(pre[-1]+a[i]) max_ending_here = 0 max_so_far = 0 for i in range(n): max_ending_here += a[i] if(max_ending_here < 0): max_ending_here = 0 l[i] = max_ending_here max_ending_here = 0 max_so_far = 0 for i in range(n-1,-1,-1): max_ending_here += a[i] if(max_ending_here < 0): max_ending_here = 0 r[i] = max_ending_here rans = lans = 0 for i in range(n): rans = max(rans,r[i+1]+pre[i]*x+lans) rans = max(rans,l[i]) lans = max(lans,l[i]-pre[i]*x) print(rans) ```
output
1
9,978
12
19,957
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0.
instruction
0
9,979
12
19,958
Tags: brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, dp, greedy Correct Solution: ``` n,x=map(int,input().split()) a=list(map(int,input().split())) b=[[0]*3 for i in range(n)] m=0 for i in range(n): if i==0: b[i][0]=max(a[i],0) b[i][1]=max(x*a[i],b[i][0]) b[i][2]=max(a[i],b[i][1]) else: b[i][0]=max(b[i-1][0]+a[i],0) b[i][1]=max(b[i-1][1]+x*a[i],b[i][0]) b[i][2]=max(b[i-1][2]+a[i],b[i][1]) if m<b[i][2]: m=b[i][2] print(m) ```
output
1
9,979
12
19,959
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0. Submitted Solution: ``` n,x=map(int,input().split()) a=list(map(int,input().split())) dp=[[0 for i in range(3)] for j in range(n+1)] a=[0]+a #3 dps lagenge >:|) res=0 for i in range(1,n+1): dp[i][0]= max(0,dp[i-1][0]+a[i],a[i]) #current le ya na le dp[i][1]=max(0,dp[i-1][0]+a[i]*x,dp[i-1][1]+a[i]*x,a[i]*x) #check and see which gives the best ans dp[i][2]= max(0,a[i],dp[i-1][0]+a[i],dp[i-1][1]+a[i],dp[i-1][2]+a[i]) #main dp res=max(res,dp[i][0],dp[i][1],dp[i][2]) #print(dp) print(res) ```
instruction
0
9,980
12
19,960
Yes
output
1
9,980
12
19,961
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0. Submitted Solution: ``` n,k = map(int,input().split()) l = [*map(int,input().split())] dp = [[0] * 3 for i in range(n)] for i in range(n): for j in range(3): dp[i][j] = float("inf") ans = 0 for i in range(n): if(i == 0): dp[i][0] = max(l[i],0) dp[i][1] = max(l[i] * k, 0) dp[i][2] = max(l[i], 0) else: dp[i][0] = max(dp[i - 1][0] + l[i], 0) dp[i][1] = max(max(dp[i - 1][0],dp[i -1][1]) + l[i] * k, 0) dp[i][2] = max(max(dp[i - 1][1],dp[i - 1][2]) + l[i], 0) ans = max(ans, max(dp[i][0],dp[i][1],dp[i][2])) print(ans) ```
instruction
0
9,981
12
19,962
Yes
output
1
9,981
12
19,963
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0. Submitted Solution: ``` import sys import math as mt import bisect #input=sys.stdin.readline #t=int(input()) t=1 def solve(): suma=dp[0][3] for i in range(1,n): dp[i][0]=0 dp[i][1]=l[i]+dp[i-1][1] dp[i][2]=x*l[i]+dp[i-1][2] dp[i][3]=l[i]+dp[i-1][3] for j in range(1,4): dp[i][j]=max(dp[i][j-1],dp[i][j]) suma=max(dp[i][3],suma) return suma for _ in range(t): #n=int(input()) n,x=map(int,input().split()) #x,y,k=map(int,input().split()) #n,h=(map(int,input().split())) l=list(map(int,input().split())) dp=[[0 for j in range(4)] for i in range(n)] dp[0][0]=0 dp[0][1]=l[0] dp[0][2]=x*l[0] dp[0][3]=l[0] for j in range(1,4): dp[0][j]=max(dp[0][j],dp[0][j-1]) print(solve()) ```
instruction
0
9,982
12
19,964
Yes
output
1
9,982
12
19,965
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0. Submitted Solution: ``` n, x = map(int, input().split()) arr = [int(x) for x in input().split()] dp = [[0 for _ in range(n)] for _ in range(3)] dp[0][0] = max(arr[0], 0) dp[1][0] = max(arr[0] * x, 0) dp[2][0] = max(arr[0], 0) answer = max(dp[0][0], dp[1][0], dp[2][0]) for i in range(1, n): dp[0][i] = max(dp[0][i - 1] + arr[i], arr[i], 0) dp[1][i] = max(dp[0][i - 1] + arr[i] * x, dp[1][i - 1] + arr[i] * x, arr[i] * x, 0) dp[2][i] = max(dp[1][i - 1] + arr[i], dp[2][i - 1] + arr[i], arr[i], 0) answer = max(answer, dp[0][i], dp[1][i], dp[2][i]) print(answer) ```
instruction
0
9,983
12
19,966
Yes
output
1
9,983
12
19,967
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 2 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0. Submitted Solution: ``` from sys import stdin, stdout from collections import Counter, defaultdict from itertools import permutations, combinations raw_input = stdin.readline pr = stdout.write def in_num(): return int(raw_input()) def in_arr(): return map(int,raw_input().split()) def pr_num(n): stdout.write(str(n)+'\n') def pr_arr(arr): pr(' '.join(map(str,arr))+'\n') # fast read function for total integer input def inp(): # this function returns whole input of # space/line seperated integers # Use Ctrl+D to flush stdin. return map(int,stdin.read().split()) range = xrange # not for python 3.0+ n,x=in_arr() l=in_arr() dp=[[[-1000000000000,-1000000000000,-1000000000000] for i in range(3)] for j in range(n+1)] dp[0][0][0]=0 for i in range(n+1): for j in range(3): for k in range(3): if k<2: dp[i][j][k+1]=max(dp[i][j][k+1], dp[i][j][k]) if j<2: dp[i][j+1][k]=max(dp[i][j+1][k],dp[i][j][k]) if i<n and j==1: if k==1: dp[i+1][j][k]=max(dp[i+1][j][k],dp[i][j][k]+(l[i]*x)) else: dp[i+1][j][k]=max(dp[i+1][j][k],dp[i][j][k]+(l[i])) elif i<n: dp[i+1][j][k]=max(dp[i+1][j][k],dp[i][j][k]) pr_num(dp[n][2][2]) ```
instruction
0
9,984
12
19,968
Yes
output
1
9,984
12
19,969
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0. Submitted Solution: ``` n, m = map(int, input().split()) dp = [0]*(n+1) nums = list(map(int, input().split())) dp[0] = max(nums[0],0) for i in range(1,n): dp[i] = max(nums[i]+dp[i-1], nums[i]) rdp = [0]*(n+1) for i in range(n-1,-1,-1): rdp[i] = min(nums[i]+rdp[i+1], nums[i]) if m > 0: print(max(dp)*m) else: ans = 0 for i in range(n+1): if i == 0: ans = max(rdp[i]*m, ans) elif i == n: ans = max(dp[i-1], ans) else: ans = max(dp[i-1]+rdp[i]*m, ans) print(ans) ```
instruction
0
9,985
12
19,970
No
output
1
9,985
12
19,971
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0. Submitted Solution: ``` # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- """ Created on Mon Apr 29 11:12:46 2019 @author: John Nguyen """ import random def findmax(a): max_so_far = 0 max_ending_here = 0 k = 0 j = 0 for i in range(0, len(a)): max_ending_here += a[i] if max_ending_here <0: max_ending_here = 0 k = i elif max_ending_here > max_so_far: max_so_far = max_ending_here j = i return max_so_far, [k,j] def findmin(a): min_so_far = 0 min_ending_here = 0 k = 0 j = 0 for i in range(0,len(a)): min_ending_here += a[i] if min_ending_here > 0: min_ending_here = 0 k = i elif min_ending_here < min_so_far: min_so_far = min_ending_here j = i return min_so_far, [k,j] n, x = input().split() n = int(n) x = int(x) a = input().split() for i in range(0,n): a[i] = int(a[i]) max_value, max_index = findmax(a) min_value, min_index = findmin(a) if max_value> 0 and x >0: print(max_value*x) elif min_value < 0 and x < 0: i,j = min_index subsets = a[i+1:j+1] for k in range(0, len(subsets)): subsets[k] = subsets[k]*x a[i+1:j+1] = subsets new_max = findmax(a) if new_max[0] > max_value: print(new_max[0]) else: print(max_value) else: print(max_value) ```
instruction
0
9,986
12
19,972
No
output
1
9,986
12
19,973
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0. Submitted Solution: ``` n,x=map(int, input().split()) A=list(map(int,input().split())) DP=[[0]*3 for _ in range(n+1)] ans=0 for i in range(1,n+1): DP[i][0]=max(DP[i-1][0]+A[i-1],A[i-1]) DP[i][1]=max(DP[i-1][0]+A[i-1]*x,DP[i-1][1]+A[i-1]*x,A[i-1]*x) DP[i][2]=max(DP[i-1][1]+A[i-1]*x,DP[i-1][2]+A[i-1]*x,A[i-1]) ans=max(ans,max(DP[i])) print(ans) ```
instruction
0
9,987
12
19,974
No
output
1
9,987
12
19,975
Evaluate the correctness of the submitted Python 3 solution to the coding contest problem. Provide a "Yes" or "No" response. You are given an array a consisting of n integers. Beauty of array is the maximum sum of some consecutive subarray of this array (this subarray may be empty). For example, the beauty of the array [10, -5, 10, -4, 1] is 15, and the beauty of the array [-3, -5, -1] is 0. You may choose at most one consecutive subarray of a and multiply all values contained in this subarray by x. You want to maximize the beauty of array after applying at most one such operation. Input The first line contains two integers n and x (1 ≤ n ≤ 3 ⋅ 10^5, -100 ≤ x ≤ 100) — the length of array a and the integer x respectively. The second line contains n integers a_1, a_2, ..., a_n (-10^9 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^9) — the array a. Output Print one integer — the maximum possible beauty of array a after multiplying all values belonging to some consecutive subarray x. Examples Input 5 -2 -3 8 -2 1 -6 Output 22 Input 12 -3 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 1 3 3 7 Output 42 Input 5 10 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Output 0 Note In the first test case we need to multiply the subarray [-2, 1, -6], and the array becomes [-3, 8, 4, -2, 12] with beauty 22 ([-3, 8, 4, -2, 12]). In the second test case we don't need to multiply any subarray at all. In the third test case no matter which subarray we multiply, the beauty of array will be equal to 0. Submitted Solution: ``` from sys import stdin, stdout from math import gcd nmbr = lambda : int(input()) lst = lambda : list(map(int, input().split())) for _ in range(1):#nmbr()): n,x=lst() a=lst() dppos=[i for i in range(n)] dp=[a[i] for i in range(n)] pre=[0]*n pre[0]=a[0] for i in range(1,n): pre[i]=max(a[i],pre[i-1]+a[i]) suf=[0]*n suf[n-1]=a[n-1] for i in range(n-2,-1,-1): suf[i]=max(a[i],a[i]+suf[i+1]) for i in range(1,n): if dp[i-1]+a[i]>=a[i]: dp[i]=a[i]+dp[i-1] dppos[i]=dppos[i-1] else: dppos[i]=i dp[i]=a[i] # print(dp) # print(dppos) ans=max(0,max(pre)) for i in range(n): sm=dp[i] leftsm=rightsm=0 if dppos[i]-1>=0:leftsm=pre[dppos[i]-1] if i+1<n:rightsm=suf[i+1] ans=max(ans, dp[i]*x+leftsm+rightsm) # print(ans) dppos=[i for i in range(n)] dp=[a[i] for i in range(n)] for i in range(1,n): if dp[i-1]+a[i]<=a[i]: dppos[i]=dppos[i-1] dp[i]=dp[i-1]+a[i] else: dppos[i]=i dp[i]=a[i] # print(dp) # print(dppos) for i in range(n): sm=dp[i] leftsm=rightsm=0 if dppos[i]-1>=0:leftsm=pre[dppos[i]-1] if i+1<n:rightsm=suf[i+1] ans=max(ans, dp[i]*x+leftsm+rightsm) # print(ans) print(ans) ```
instruction
0
9,988
12
19,976
No
output
1
9,988
12
19,977
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given two integers a and b. You can perform a sequence of operations: during the first operation you choose one of these numbers and increase it by 1; during the second operation you choose one of these numbers and increase it by 2, and so on. You choose the number of these operations yourself. For example, if a = 1 and b = 3, you can perform the following sequence of three operations: 1. add 1 to a, then a = 2 and b = 3; 2. add 2 to b, then a = 2 and b = 5; 3. add 3 to a, then a = 5 and b = 5. Calculate the minimum number of operations required to make a and b equal. Input The first line contains one integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 100) — the number of test cases. The only line of each test case contains two integers a and b (1 ≤ a, b ≤ 10^9). Output For each test case print one integer — the minimum numbers of operations required to make a and b equal. Example Input 3 1 3 11 11 30 20 Output 3 0 4 Note First test case considered in the statement. In the second test case integers a and b are already equal, so you don't need to perform any operations. In the third test case you have to apply the first, the second, the third and the fourth operation to b (b turns into 20 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 30).
instruction
0
10,062
12
20,124
Tags: greedy, math Correct Solution: ``` import sys from functools import lru_cache, cmp_to_key from heapq import merge, heapify, heappop, heappush from math import ceil, floor, gcd, fabs, factorial, fmod, sqrt, inf, log from collections import defaultdict as dd, deque, Counter as C from itertools import combinations as comb, permutations as perm from bisect import bisect_left as bl, bisect_right as br, bisect from time import perf_counter from fractions import Fraction # sys.setrecursionlimit(pow(10, 6)) # sys.stdin = open("input.txt", "r") # sys.stdout = open("output.txt", "w") mod = pow(10, 9) + 7 mod2 = 998244353 def data(): return sys.stdin.readline().strip() def out(*var, end="\n"): sys.stdout.write(' '.join(map(str, var))+end) def l(): return list(sp()) def sl(): return list(ssp()) def sp(): return map(int, data().split()) def ssp(): return map(str, data().split()) def l1d(n, val=0): return [val for i in range(n)] def l2d(n, m, val=0): return [l1d(n, val) for j in range(m)] for _ in range(int(data())): a, b = sp() diff = abs(a-b) for i in range(100001): temp = (i * (i + 1)) // 2 if temp >= diff and not ((temp + a + b) & 1): out(i) break ```
output
1
10,062
12
20,125
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given two integers a and b. You can perform a sequence of operations: during the first operation you choose one of these numbers and increase it by 1; during the second operation you choose one of these numbers and increase it by 2, and so on. You choose the number of these operations yourself. For example, if a = 1 and b = 3, you can perform the following sequence of three operations: 1. add 1 to a, then a = 2 and b = 3; 2. add 2 to b, then a = 2 and b = 5; 3. add 3 to a, then a = 5 and b = 5. Calculate the minimum number of operations required to make a and b equal. Input The first line contains one integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 100) — the number of test cases. The only line of each test case contains two integers a and b (1 ≤ a, b ≤ 10^9). Output For each test case print one integer — the minimum numbers of operations required to make a and b equal. Example Input 3 1 3 11 11 30 20 Output 3 0 4 Note First test case considered in the statement. In the second test case integers a and b are already equal, so you don't need to perform any operations. In the third test case you have to apply the first, the second, the third and the fourth operation to b (b turns into 20 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 30).
instruction
0
10,063
12
20,126
Tags: greedy, math Correct Solution: ``` import math,sys from collections import Counter, defaultdict, deque from sys import stdin, stdout input = stdin.readline lili=lambda:list(map(int,sys.stdin.readlines())) li = lambda:list(map(int,input().split())) #for deque append(),pop(),appendleft(),popleft(),count() I=lambda:int(input()) S=lambda:input().strip() t=I() for i in range(0,t): a,b=li() d=abs(a-b) s=0 i=1 ans=0 while(s<d): s=s+i i+=1 ans+=1 if(s==d): print(ans) else: while((d-s)%2): s=s+i i+=1 print(i-1) ```
output
1
10,063
12
20,127
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given two integers a and b. You can perform a sequence of operations: during the first operation you choose one of these numbers and increase it by 1; during the second operation you choose one of these numbers and increase it by 2, and so on. You choose the number of these operations yourself. For example, if a = 1 and b = 3, you can perform the following sequence of three operations: 1. add 1 to a, then a = 2 and b = 3; 2. add 2 to b, then a = 2 and b = 5; 3. add 3 to a, then a = 5 and b = 5. Calculate the minimum number of operations required to make a and b equal. Input The first line contains one integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 100) — the number of test cases. The only line of each test case contains two integers a and b (1 ≤ a, b ≤ 10^9). Output For each test case print one integer — the minimum numbers of operations required to make a and b equal. Example Input 3 1 3 11 11 30 20 Output 3 0 4 Note First test case considered in the statement. In the second test case integers a and b are already equal, so you don't need to perform any operations. In the third test case you have to apply the first, the second, the third and the fourth operation to b (b turns into 20 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 30).
instruction
0
10,066
12
20,132
Tags: greedy, math Correct Solution: ``` import sys input = sys.stdin.readline t=int(input()) NLIST=[N*(N+1)//2 for N in range(10**5)] import bisect for test in range(t): a,b=map(int,input().split()) x=abs(b-a) N=bisect.bisect_left(NLIST,x) #print(x,N) while x%2!=((N+1)//2)%2: N+=1 print(N) ```
output
1
10,066
12
20,133
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array of positive integers a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] (n ≥ 2). In one step, the array a is replaced with another array of length n, in which each element is the [greatest common divisor (GCD)](http://tiny.cc/tuy9uz) of two neighboring elements (the element itself and its right neighbor; consider that the right neighbor of the (n - 1)-th element is the 0-th element). Formally speaking, a new array b = [b_0, b_1, ..., b_{n - 1}] is being built from array a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] such that b_i = \gcd(a_i, a_{(i + 1) mod n}), where \gcd(x, y) is the greatest common divisor of x and y, and x mod y is the remainder of x dividing by y. In one step the array b is built and then the array a is replaced with b (that is, the assignment a := b is taking place). For example, if a = [16, 24, 10, 5] then b = [\gcd(16, 24), \gcd(24, 10), \gcd(10, 5), \gcd(5, 16)] = [8, 2, 5, 1]. Thus, after one step the array a = [16, 24, 10, 5] will be equal to [8, 2, 5, 1]. For a given array a, find the minimum number of steps after which all values a_i become equal (that is, a_0 = a_1 = ... = a_{n - 1}). If the original array a consists of identical elements then consider the number of steps is equal to 0. Input The first line contains an integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^4). Then t test cases follow. Each test case contains two lines. The first line contains an integer n (2 ≤ n ≤ 2 ⋅ 10^5) — length of the sequence a. The second line contains n integers a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1} (1 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^6). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases doesn't exceed 2 ⋅ 10^5. Output Print t numbers — answers for each test case. Example Input 5 4 16 24 10 5 4 42 42 42 42 3 4 6 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 9 27 9 9 63 Output 3 0 2 1 1
instruction
0
10,207
12
20,414
Tags: binary search, brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, number theory, two pointers Correct Solution: ``` from collections import defaultdict, deque, Counter from heapq import heapify, heappop, heappush import math from copy import deepcopy from itertools import combinations, permutations, product, combinations_with_replacement from bisect import bisect_left, bisect_right import sys def input(): return sys.stdin.readline().rstrip() def getN(): return int(input()) def getNM(): return map(int, input().split()) def getList(): return list(map(int, input().split())) def getListGraph(): return list(map(lambda x:int(x) - 1, input().split())) def getArray(intn): return [int(input()) for i in range(intn)] mod = 10 ** 9 + 7 MOD = 998244353 inf = float('inf') eps = 10 ** (-10) dy = [0, 1, 0, -1] dx = [1, 0, -1, 0] ############# # Main Code # ############# # ここの設定を変えて使う #####segfunc##### def segfunc(x, y): return math.gcd(x, y) ################# #####ide_ele##### ide_ele = 0 ################# class SegTree: def __init__(self, init_val, segfunc, ide_ele): n = len(init_val) self.segfunc = segfunc self.ide_ele = ide_ele self.num = 1 << (n - 1).bit_length() self.tree = [ide_ele] * 2 * self.num # 配列の値を葉にセット for i in range(n): self.tree[self.num + i] = init_val[i] # 構築していく for i in range(self.num - 1, 0, -1): self.tree[i] = self.segfunc(self.tree[2 * i], self.tree[2 * i + 1]) def update(self, k, x): k += self.num self.tree[k] = x while k > 1: self.tree[k >> 1] = self.segfunc(self.tree[k], self.tree[k ^ 1]) k >>= 1 def query(self, l, r): res = self.ide_ele l += self.num r += self.num while l < r: if l & 1: res = self.segfunc(res, self.tree[l]) l += 1 if r & 1: res = self.segfunc(res, self.tree[r - 1]) l >>= 1 r >>= 1 return res # gcdする # gcd(a1, a2), gcd(a2, a3)... 輪っかになっている # だんだんgcdが1とかにならされて行くのでは? # 操作回数の最小を求める # 連続部分列Kについていずれの列でもgcdが等しくなる # gcdはモノイドだぞ セグ木使えば T = getN() for _ in range(T): N = getN() A = getList() A += A def f(x): seg = SegTree(A, segfunc, ide_ele) # セグ木立てる res = [seg.query(i, i + x) for i in range(N)] return all([res[i] == res[0] for i in range(N)]) ok = N + 1 ng = 0 while abs(ok - ng) > 1: mid = (ok + ng) // 2 if f(mid): ok = mid else: ng = mid print(ok - 1) ```
output
1
10,207
12
20,415
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array of positive integers a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] (n ≥ 2). In one step, the array a is replaced with another array of length n, in which each element is the [greatest common divisor (GCD)](http://tiny.cc/tuy9uz) of two neighboring elements (the element itself and its right neighbor; consider that the right neighbor of the (n - 1)-th element is the 0-th element). Formally speaking, a new array b = [b_0, b_1, ..., b_{n - 1}] is being built from array a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] such that b_i = \gcd(a_i, a_{(i + 1) mod n}), where \gcd(x, y) is the greatest common divisor of x and y, and x mod y is the remainder of x dividing by y. In one step the array b is built and then the array a is replaced with b (that is, the assignment a := b is taking place). For example, if a = [16, 24, 10, 5] then b = [\gcd(16, 24), \gcd(24, 10), \gcd(10, 5), \gcd(5, 16)] = [8, 2, 5, 1]. Thus, after one step the array a = [16, 24, 10, 5] will be equal to [8, 2, 5, 1]. For a given array a, find the minimum number of steps after which all values a_i become equal (that is, a_0 = a_1 = ... = a_{n - 1}). If the original array a consists of identical elements then consider the number of steps is equal to 0. Input The first line contains an integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^4). Then t test cases follow. Each test case contains two lines. The first line contains an integer n (2 ≤ n ≤ 2 ⋅ 10^5) — length of the sequence a. The second line contains n integers a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1} (1 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^6). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases doesn't exceed 2 ⋅ 10^5. Output Print t numbers — answers for each test case. Example Input 5 4 16 24 10 5 4 42 42 42 42 3 4 6 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 9 27 9 9 63 Output 3 0 2 1 1
instruction
0
10,208
12
20,416
Tags: binary search, brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, number theory, two pointers Correct Solution: ``` import math import sys input = sys.stdin.readline def make_tree(n): i = 2 while True: if i >= n * 2: tree = [0] * i break else: i *= 2 return tree def initialization(a): l = len(tree) // 2 for i in range(l, l + len(a)): tree[i] = a[i - l] for i in range(l - 1, 0, -1): tree[i] = math.gcd(tree[2 * i], tree[2 * i + 1]) return def update(i, x): i += len(tree) // 2 tree[i] = x i //= 2 while True: if i == 0: break tree[i] = math.gcd(tree[2 * i], tree[2 * i + 1]) i //= 2 return def get_gcd(s, t): s += len(tree) // 2 t += len(tree) // 2 ans = tree[s] while True: if s > t: break if s % 2 == 0: s //= 2 else: ans = math.gcd(ans, tree[s]) s = (s + 1) // 2 if t % 2 == 1: t //= 2 else: ans = math.gcd(ans, tree[t]) t = (t - 1) // 2 return ans def binary_search(c1, c2): m = (c1 + c2 + 1) // 2 if abs(c1 - c2) <= 1: return m else: if ok(m): c2 = m else: c1 = m return binary_search(c1, c2) def ok(m): g = get_gcd(0, m) for i in range(1, n): if get_gcd(i, m + i) ^ g: return False return True t = int(input()) for _ in range(t): n = int(input()) a = list(map(int, input().split())) tree = make_tree(2 * n + 1) initialization(a + a) ans = binary_search(-1, n) print(ans) ```
output
1
10,208
12
20,417
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array of positive integers a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] (n ≥ 2). In one step, the array a is replaced with another array of length n, in which each element is the [greatest common divisor (GCD)](http://tiny.cc/tuy9uz) of two neighboring elements (the element itself and its right neighbor; consider that the right neighbor of the (n - 1)-th element is the 0-th element). Formally speaking, a new array b = [b_0, b_1, ..., b_{n - 1}] is being built from array a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] such that b_i = \gcd(a_i, a_{(i + 1) mod n}), where \gcd(x, y) is the greatest common divisor of x and y, and x mod y is the remainder of x dividing by y. In one step the array b is built and then the array a is replaced with b (that is, the assignment a := b is taking place). For example, if a = [16, 24, 10, 5] then b = [\gcd(16, 24), \gcd(24, 10), \gcd(10, 5), \gcd(5, 16)] = [8, 2, 5, 1]. Thus, after one step the array a = [16, 24, 10, 5] will be equal to [8, 2, 5, 1]. For a given array a, find the minimum number of steps after which all values a_i become equal (that is, a_0 = a_1 = ... = a_{n - 1}). If the original array a consists of identical elements then consider the number of steps is equal to 0. Input The first line contains an integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^4). Then t test cases follow. Each test case contains two lines. The first line contains an integer n (2 ≤ n ≤ 2 ⋅ 10^5) — length of the sequence a. The second line contains n integers a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1} (1 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^6). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases doesn't exceed 2 ⋅ 10^5. Output Print t numbers — answers for each test case. Example Input 5 4 16 24 10 5 4 42 42 42 42 3 4 6 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 9 27 9 9 63 Output 3 0 2 1 1
instruction
0
10,209
12
20,418
Tags: binary search, brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, number theory, two pointers Correct Solution: ``` import sys from functools import reduce from math import gcd #comment these out later #sys.stdin = open("in.in", "r") #sys.stdout = open("out.out", "w") def main(): class RangeQuery: def __init__(self, data, func=min): self.func = func self._data = _data = [list(data)] i, n = 1, len(_data[0]) while 2 * i <= n: prev = _data[-1] _data.append([func(prev[j], prev[j + i]) for j in range(n - 2 * i + 1)]) i <<= 1 def query(self, start, stop): """func of data[start, stop)""" depth = (stop - start).bit_length() - 1 return self.func(self._data[depth][start], self._data[depth][stop - (1 << depth)]) def __getitem__(self, idx): return self._data[0][idx] inp = [int(x) for x in sys.stdin.read().split()]; ii = 0 t = inp[ii]; ii += 1 for _ in range(t): n = inp[ii]; ii += 1 ar = inp[ii:ii+n]; ii += n ar = ar+ar spt = RangeQuery(ar, gcd) target = spt.query(0, n) ans = 0 for i in range(n): for l in range(ans+1, n+1): g = spt.query(i, i+l) if g == target: ans = max(ans, l-1) break print(ans) main() ```
output
1
10,209
12
20,419
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array of positive integers a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] (n ≥ 2). In one step, the array a is replaced with another array of length n, in which each element is the [greatest common divisor (GCD)](http://tiny.cc/tuy9uz) of two neighboring elements (the element itself and its right neighbor; consider that the right neighbor of the (n - 1)-th element is the 0-th element). Formally speaking, a new array b = [b_0, b_1, ..., b_{n - 1}] is being built from array a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] such that b_i = \gcd(a_i, a_{(i + 1) mod n}), where \gcd(x, y) is the greatest common divisor of x and y, and x mod y is the remainder of x dividing by y. In one step the array b is built and then the array a is replaced with b (that is, the assignment a := b is taking place). For example, if a = [16, 24, 10, 5] then b = [\gcd(16, 24), \gcd(24, 10), \gcd(10, 5), \gcd(5, 16)] = [8, 2, 5, 1]. Thus, after one step the array a = [16, 24, 10, 5] will be equal to [8, 2, 5, 1]. For a given array a, find the minimum number of steps after which all values a_i become equal (that is, a_0 = a_1 = ... = a_{n - 1}). If the original array a consists of identical elements then consider the number of steps is equal to 0. Input The first line contains an integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^4). Then t test cases follow. Each test case contains two lines. The first line contains an integer n (2 ≤ n ≤ 2 ⋅ 10^5) — length of the sequence a. The second line contains n integers a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1} (1 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^6). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases doesn't exceed 2 ⋅ 10^5. Output Print t numbers — answers for each test case. Example Input 5 4 16 24 10 5 4 42 42 42 42 3 4 6 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 9 27 9 9 63 Output 3 0 2 1 1
instruction
0
10,210
12
20,420
Tags: binary search, brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, number theory, two pointers Correct Solution: ``` import sys,os,io input = io.BytesIO(os.read(0, os.fstat(0).st_size)).readline from math import gcd class RangeQuery: def __init__(self, data, func=gcd): self.func = func self._data = _data = [list(data)] i, n = 1, len(_data[0]) while 2 * i <= n: prev = _data[-1] _data.append([func(prev[j], prev[j + i]) for j in range(n - 2 * i + 1)]) i <<= 1 def query(self, start, stop): """func of data[start, stop)""" depth = (stop - start).bit_length() - 1 return self.func(self._data[depth][start], self._data[depth][stop - (1 << depth)]) def __getitem__(self, idx): return self._data[0][idx] for _ in range (int(input())): n = int(input()) a = [int(i) for i in input().split()] a += a[:] g = a[0] for i in a: g = gcd(i,g) rmq = RangeQuery(a) l = 1 h = n ans = -1 while(l<=h): mid = (l+h)//2 flag = 0 for i in range (n): curr = rmq.query(i, i+mid) if curr != g: flag = 1 if flag: l = mid+1 else: ans = mid-1 h = mid-1 print(ans) ```
output
1
10,210
12
20,421
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array of positive integers a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] (n ≥ 2). In one step, the array a is replaced with another array of length n, in which each element is the [greatest common divisor (GCD)](http://tiny.cc/tuy9uz) of two neighboring elements (the element itself and its right neighbor; consider that the right neighbor of the (n - 1)-th element is the 0-th element). Formally speaking, a new array b = [b_0, b_1, ..., b_{n - 1}] is being built from array a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] such that b_i = \gcd(a_i, a_{(i + 1) mod n}), where \gcd(x, y) is the greatest common divisor of x and y, and x mod y is the remainder of x dividing by y. In one step the array b is built and then the array a is replaced with b (that is, the assignment a := b is taking place). For example, if a = [16, 24, 10, 5] then b = [\gcd(16, 24), \gcd(24, 10), \gcd(10, 5), \gcd(5, 16)] = [8, 2, 5, 1]. Thus, after one step the array a = [16, 24, 10, 5] will be equal to [8, 2, 5, 1]. For a given array a, find the minimum number of steps after which all values a_i become equal (that is, a_0 = a_1 = ... = a_{n - 1}). If the original array a consists of identical elements then consider the number of steps is equal to 0. Input The first line contains an integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^4). Then t test cases follow. Each test case contains two lines. The first line contains an integer n (2 ≤ n ≤ 2 ⋅ 10^5) — length of the sequence a. The second line contains n integers a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1} (1 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^6). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases doesn't exceed 2 ⋅ 10^5. Output Print t numbers — answers for each test case. Example Input 5 4 16 24 10 5 4 42 42 42 42 3 4 6 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 9 27 9 9 63 Output 3 0 2 1 1
instruction
0
10,211
12
20,422
Tags: binary search, brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, number theory, two pointers Correct Solution: ``` import sys from math import gcd t = int(sys.stdin.readline()) while(t>0): n = int(input()) a = list(map(int,sys.stdin.readline().split())) a = a+a m = 0 for i in range(n): x = a[i] y = a[i+1] c = 0 j = i+1 while x!=y: x = gcd(x,a[j]) y = gcd(y,a[j+1]) j += 1 c += 1 m = max(m,c) print(m) t-=1 ```
output
1
10,211
12
20,423
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array of positive integers a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] (n ≥ 2). In one step, the array a is replaced with another array of length n, in which each element is the [greatest common divisor (GCD)](http://tiny.cc/tuy9uz) of two neighboring elements (the element itself and its right neighbor; consider that the right neighbor of the (n - 1)-th element is the 0-th element). Formally speaking, a new array b = [b_0, b_1, ..., b_{n - 1}] is being built from array a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] such that b_i = \gcd(a_i, a_{(i + 1) mod n}), where \gcd(x, y) is the greatest common divisor of x and y, and x mod y is the remainder of x dividing by y. In one step the array b is built and then the array a is replaced with b (that is, the assignment a := b is taking place). For example, if a = [16, 24, 10, 5] then b = [\gcd(16, 24), \gcd(24, 10), \gcd(10, 5), \gcd(5, 16)] = [8, 2, 5, 1]. Thus, after one step the array a = [16, 24, 10, 5] will be equal to [8, 2, 5, 1]. For a given array a, find the minimum number of steps after which all values a_i become equal (that is, a_0 = a_1 = ... = a_{n - 1}). If the original array a consists of identical elements then consider the number of steps is equal to 0. Input The first line contains an integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^4). Then t test cases follow. Each test case contains two lines. The first line contains an integer n (2 ≤ n ≤ 2 ⋅ 10^5) — length of the sequence a. The second line contains n integers a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1} (1 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^6). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases doesn't exceed 2 ⋅ 10^5. Output Print t numbers — answers for each test case. Example Input 5 4 16 24 10 5 4 42 42 42 42 3 4 6 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 9 27 9 9 63 Output 3 0 2 1 1
instruction
0
10,212
12
20,424
Tags: binary search, brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, number theory, two pointers Correct Solution: ``` def read_ints(): return list(map(int, input().split())) def gcd(x, y): if x == 0 or y == 0: return x + y if x > y: return gcd(x % y, y) else: return gcd(x, y % x) def remove_gcd(a): g = gcd(a[0], a[1]) for i in range(2, len(a)): g = gcd(g, a[i]) return [x // g for x in a] def make_cycled(a): a.extend(a[:-1]) return a def create_dp(a): n = len(a) k = 0 while n > 0: k += 1 n //= 2 dp = [[0 for _ in range(len(a))] for _ in range(k)] dp[0] = a step = 1 for i in range(1, k): step *= 2 for j in range(len(a)): if j + step <= len(a): dp[i][j] = gcd(dp[i - 1][j], dp[i - 1][j + step // 2]) return dp def get_seq_gcd(dp, l, r): step = 1 k = -1 while r - l >= step: step *= 2 k += 1 step //= 2 #print(k, l, r, step) return gcd(dp[k][l], dp[k][r - step]) def get_answer(dp): answer = 0 l, r = 0, 1 while l < len(dp[0]): cur = get_seq_gcd(dp, l, r) while r < len(dp[0]) and cur > 1: cur = gcd(cur, dp[0][r]) r += 1 #print(l, r, cur) answer = max(answer, r - l - 1) l += 1 if l == r: r += 1 return answer t = int(input()) for _ in range(t): n = int(input()) a = read_ints() a = remove_gcd(a) a = make_cycled(a) dp = create_dp(a) answer = get_answer(dp) print(answer) ```
output
1
10,212
12
20,425
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array of positive integers a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] (n ≥ 2). In one step, the array a is replaced with another array of length n, in which each element is the [greatest common divisor (GCD)](http://tiny.cc/tuy9uz) of two neighboring elements (the element itself and its right neighbor; consider that the right neighbor of the (n - 1)-th element is the 0-th element). Formally speaking, a new array b = [b_0, b_1, ..., b_{n - 1}] is being built from array a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] such that b_i = \gcd(a_i, a_{(i + 1) mod n}), where \gcd(x, y) is the greatest common divisor of x and y, and x mod y is the remainder of x dividing by y. In one step the array b is built and then the array a is replaced with b (that is, the assignment a := b is taking place). For example, if a = [16, 24, 10, 5] then b = [\gcd(16, 24), \gcd(24, 10), \gcd(10, 5), \gcd(5, 16)] = [8, 2, 5, 1]. Thus, after one step the array a = [16, 24, 10, 5] will be equal to [8, 2, 5, 1]. For a given array a, find the minimum number of steps after which all values a_i become equal (that is, a_0 = a_1 = ... = a_{n - 1}). If the original array a consists of identical elements then consider the number of steps is equal to 0. Input The first line contains an integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^4). Then t test cases follow. Each test case contains two lines. The first line contains an integer n (2 ≤ n ≤ 2 ⋅ 10^5) — length of the sequence a. The second line contains n integers a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1} (1 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^6). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases doesn't exceed 2 ⋅ 10^5. Output Print t numbers — answers for each test case. Example Input 5 4 16 24 10 5 4 42 42 42 42 3 4 6 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 9 27 9 9 63 Output 3 0 2 1 1
instruction
0
10,213
12
20,426
Tags: binary search, brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, number theory, two pointers Correct Solution: ``` from __future__ import division, print_function import os,sys from io import BytesIO, IOBase if sys.version_info[0] < 3: from __builtin__ import xrange as range from future_builtins import ascii, filter, hex, map, oct, zip from bisect import bisect_left as lower_bound, bisect_right as upper_bound def so(): return int(input()) def st(): return input() def mj(): return map(int,input().strip().split(" ")) def msj(): return map(str,input().strip().split(" ")) def le(): return list(map(int,input().split())) def lebe():return list(map(int, input())) def dmain(): sys.setrecursionlimit(1000000) threading.stack_size(1024000) thread = threading.Thread(target=main) thread.start() def joro(L): return(''.join(map(str, L))) def cheems(c,d): a=1 while(d!=0): if(d%2==1): a*=c c=c*c d=d//2 return a def decimalToBinary(n): return bin(n).replace("0b","") def isprime(n): for i in range(2,int(n**0.5)+1): if n%i==0: return False return True def npr(n, r): return factorial(n) // factorial(n - r) if n >= r else 0 def ncr(n, r): return factorial(n) // (factorial(r) * factorial(n - r)) if n >= r else 0 def lower_bound(li, num): answer = -1 start = 0 end = len(li) - 1 while (start <= end): middle = (end + start) // 2 if li[middle] >= num: answer = middle end = middle - 1 else: start = middle + 1 return answer # min index where x is not less than num def upper_bound(li, num): answer = -1 start = 0 end = len(li) - 1 while (start <= end): middle = (end + start) // 2 if li[middle] <= num: answer = middle start = middle + 1 else: end = middle - 1 return answer # max index where x is not greater than num def tir(a,b,c): if(0==c): return 1 if(len(a)<=b): return 0 if(c!=-1): return (tir(a,1+b,c+a[b]) or tir(a,b+1,c-a[b]) or tir(a,1+b,c)) else: return (tir(a,1+b,a[b]) or tir(a,b+1,-a[b]) or tir(a,1+b,-1)) def abs(x): return x if x >= 0 else -x def binary_search(li, val, lb, ub): # print(lb, ub, li) ans = -1 while (lb <= ub): mid = (lb + ub) // 2 # print('mid is',mid, li[mid]) if li[mid] > val: ub = mid - 1 elif val > li[mid]: lb = mid + 1 else: ans = mid # return index break return ans def kadane(x): # maximum sum contiguous subarray sum_so_far = 0 current_sum = 0 for i in x: current_sum += i if current_sum < 0: current_sum = 0 else: sum_so_far = max(sum_so_far, current_sum) return sum_so_far def wubu(m): import math as my d=0 while(not m%2): m=m//2 d=1+d for i in range(3,int(my.sqrt(m))+1,2): while(not m%i): m=m//i d=1+d return int(m>1)+d def pref(li): pref_sum = [0] for i in li: pref_sum.append(pref_sum[-1] + i) return pref_sum def SieveOfEratosthenes(n): prime = [True for i in range(n + 1)] p = 2 li = [] while (p * p <= n): if (prime[p] == True): for i in range(p * p, n + 1, p): prime[i] = False p += 1 for p in range(2, len(prime)): if prime[p]: li.append(p) return li def primefactors(n): factors = [] while (n % 2 == 0): factors.append(2) n //= 2 for i in range(3, int(sqrt(n)) + 1, 2): # only odd factors left while n % i == 0: factors.append(i) n //= i if n > 2: # incase of prime factors.append(n) return factors def read(): sys.stdin = open('input.txt', 'r') sys.stdout = open('output.txt', 'w') def tr(n): return n*(n+1)//2 def bro(q,r,c): bec,pot,h=0,0,0 ds=[] bs=[] es=[] for i in range(c): while(h<len(r) and r[h]<=q[i][0]): pot=0 ds.clear() bs.clear() h=1+h for i in range(c): ds.append(q[i][1]) es.append(q[i][1]) ds=list(set(ds)) for i in ds: bs.append(es.count(i)) print(bs) for i in range(c): if(q[i][0]>r[h-1]): bec=bec+pot-bs[i] pot=1+pot return bec def iu(): import sys input = sys.stdin.readline import math as my import bisect as op c=0 m=so() L=le() L=2*L for i in range(m): p,q,r,s=L[i],L[1+i],0,1+i while(q!=p): p,q,r,s=my.gcd(L[s],p),my.gcd(L[1+s],q),1+r,1+s c=max(r,c) print(c) def main(): for i in range(so()): iu() # region fastio # template taken from https://github.com/cheran-senthil/PyRival/blob/master/templates/template.py BUFSIZE = 8192 class FastIO(IOBase): newlines = 0 def __init__(self, file): self._fd = file.fileno() self.buffer = BytesIO() self.writable = "x" in file.mode or "r" not in file.mode self.write = self.buffer.write if self.writable else None def read(self): while True: b = os.read(self._fd, max(os.fstat(self._fd).st_size, BUFSIZE)) if not b: break ptr = self.buffer.tell() self.buffer.seek(0, 2), self.buffer.write(b), self.buffer.seek(ptr) self.newlines = 0 return self.buffer.read() def readline(self): while self.newlines == 0: b = os.read(self._fd, max(os.fstat(self._fd).st_size, BUFSIZE)) self.newlines = b.count(b"\n") + (not b) ptr = self.buffer.tell() self.buffer.seek(0, 2), self.buffer.write(b), self.buffer.seek(ptr) self.newlines -= 1 return self.buffer.readline() def flush(self): if self.writable: os.write(self._fd, self.buffer.getvalue()) self.buffer.truncate(0), self.buffer.seek(0) class IOWrapper(IOBase): def __init__(self, file): self.buffer = FastIO(file) self.flush = self.buffer.flush self.writable = self.buffer.writable self.write = lambda s: self.buffer.write(s.encode("ascii")) self.read = lambda: self.buffer.read().decode("ascii") self.readline = lambda: self.buffer.readline().decode("ascii") def print(*args, **kwargs): """Prints the values to a stream, or to sys.stdout by default.""" sep, file = kwargs.pop("sep", " "), kwargs.pop("file", sys.stdout) at_start = True for x in args: if not at_start: file.write(sep) file.write(str(x)) at_start = False file.write(kwargs.pop("end", "\n")) if kwargs.pop("flush", False): file.flush() if sys.version_info[0] < 3: sys.stdin, sys.stdout = FastIO(sys.stdin), FastIO(sys.stdout) else: sys.stdin, sys.stdout = IOWrapper(sys.stdin), IOWrapper(sys.stdout) input = lambda: sys.stdin.readline().rstrip("\r\n") # endregion if __name__ == "__main__": #read() main() #dmain() # Comment Read() ```
output
1
10,213
12
20,427
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. You are given an array of positive integers a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] (n ≥ 2). In one step, the array a is replaced with another array of length n, in which each element is the [greatest common divisor (GCD)](http://tiny.cc/tuy9uz) of two neighboring elements (the element itself and its right neighbor; consider that the right neighbor of the (n - 1)-th element is the 0-th element). Formally speaking, a new array b = [b_0, b_1, ..., b_{n - 1}] is being built from array a = [a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1}] such that b_i = \gcd(a_i, a_{(i + 1) mod n}), where \gcd(x, y) is the greatest common divisor of x and y, and x mod y is the remainder of x dividing by y. In one step the array b is built and then the array a is replaced with b (that is, the assignment a := b is taking place). For example, if a = [16, 24, 10, 5] then b = [\gcd(16, 24), \gcd(24, 10), \gcd(10, 5), \gcd(5, 16)] = [8, 2, 5, 1]. Thus, after one step the array a = [16, 24, 10, 5] will be equal to [8, 2, 5, 1]. For a given array a, find the minimum number of steps after which all values a_i become equal (that is, a_0 = a_1 = ... = a_{n - 1}). If the original array a consists of identical elements then consider the number of steps is equal to 0. Input The first line contains an integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^4). Then t test cases follow. Each test case contains two lines. The first line contains an integer n (2 ≤ n ≤ 2 ⋅ 10^5) — length of the sequence a. The second line contains n integers a_0, a_1, ..., a_{n - 1} (1 ≤ a_i ≤ 10^6). It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases doesn't exceed 2 ⋅ 10^5. Output Print t numbers — answers for each test case. Example Input 5 4 16 24 10 5 4 42 42 42 42 3 4 6 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 9 27 9 9 63 Output 3 0 2 1 1
instruction
0
10,214
12
20,428
Tags: binary search, brute force, data structures, divide and conquer, number theory, two pointers Correct Solution: ``` import sys import math input = sys.stdin.readline def sieve(n): prime = [-1]*(n+1) for i in range(2,n+1): if prime[i]==-1: for j in range(i,n+1,i): if prime[j]==-1: prime[j] = i return prime def PrimeFactors(num): ans = {} while num != 1: p = prime[num] ans[p] = 1 while num%p==0: num = num//p return ans def solve(ind, p): ans = 0 for i in range(ind, ind+n): if p not in pf[i%n]: return ans else: if i not in done: done[i] = {p:0} else: done[i][p] = 0 ans += 1 return ans prime = sieve(1000010) for nt in range(int(input())): n = int(input()) a = list(map(int,input().split())) hcf = a[0] for i in a: hcf = math.gcd(hcf, i) for i in range(n): a[i] = a[i]//hcf pf = [] for i in a: pf.append(PrimeFactors(i)) ans = 0 done = {} for i in range(n): for j in pf[i]: if i not in done: done[i] = {} if j not in done[i]: ans = max(ans, solve(i, j)) print (ans) ```
output
1
10,214
12
20,429
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Xenia the beginner programmer has a sequence a, consisting of 2n non-negative integers: a1, a2, ..., a2n. Xenia is currently studying bit operations. To better understand how they work, Xenia decided to calculate some value v for a. Namely, it takes several iterations to calculate value v. At the first iteration, Xenia writes a new sequence a1 or a2, a3 or a4, ..., a2n - 1 or a2n, consisting of 2n - 1 elements. In other words, she writes down the bit-wise OR of adjacent elements of sequence a. At the second iteration, Xenia writes the bitwise exclusive OR of adjacent elements of the sequence obtained after the first iteration. At the third iteration Xenia writes the bitwise OR of the adjacent elements of the sequence obtained after the second iteration. And so on; the operations of bitwise exclusive OR and bitwise OR alternate. In the end, she obtains a sequence consisting of one element, and that element is v. Let's consider an example. Suppose that sequence a = (1, 2, 3, 4). Then let's write down all the transformations (1, 2, 3, 4) → (1 or 2 = 3, 3 or 4 = 7) → (3 xor 7 = 4). The result is v = 4. You are given Xenia's initial sequence. But to calculate value v for a given sequence would be too easy, so you are given additional m queries. Each query is a pair of integers p, b. Query p, b means that you need to perform the assignment ap = b. After each query, you need to print the new value v for the new sequence a. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (1 ≤ n ≤ 17, 1 ≤ m ≤ 105). The next line contains 2n integers a1, a2, ..., a2n (0 ≤ ai < 230). Each of the next m lines contains queries. The i-th line contains integers pi, bi (1 ≤ pi ≤ 2n, 0 ≤ bi < 230) — the i-th query. Output Print m integers — the i-th integer denotes value v for sequence a after the i-th query. Examples Input 2 4 1 6 3 5 1 4 3 4 1 2 1 2 Output 1 3 3 3 Note For more information on the bit operations, you can follow this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitwise_operation
instruction
0
10,294
12
20,588
Tags: data structures, trees Correct Solution: ``` from sys import stdin,stdout n,m=map(int,input().split()) n=pow(2,n) tarr=list(map(int,stdin.readline().split())) arr=[0]*n arr=arr+tarr start=n end=2*n flag=0 while(start>1): for i in range(start,end,2): if(flag): arr[i>>1]=arr[i]^arr[i+1] else: arr[i>>1]=arr[i]|arr[i+1] flag=flag^1 end=start start=start>>1 for i in range(m): p,b=map(int,stdin.readline().split()) arr[n+p-1]=b pos=n+p-1 flag=0 while(pos>1): pos=pos>>1 if(flag): arr[pos]=arr[pos<<1]^arr[(pos<<1)+1] else: arr[pos]=arr[pos<<1]|arr[(pos<<1)+1] flag=flag^1 stdout.write(str(arr[1])+'\n') ```
output
1
10,294
12
20,589
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Xenia the beginner programmer has a sequence a, consisting of 2n non-negative integers: a1, a2, ..., a2n. Xenia is currently studying bit operations. To better understand how they work, Xenia decided to calculate some value v for a. Namely, it takes several iterations to calculate value v. At the first iteration, Xenia writes a new sequence a1 or a2, a3 or a4, ..., a2n - 1 or a2n, consisting of 2n - 1 elements. In other words, she writes down the bit-wise OR of adjacent elements of sequence a. At the second iteration, Xenia writes the bitwise exclusive OR of adjacent elements of the sequence obtained after the first iteration. At the third iteration Xenia writes the bitwise OR of the adjacent elements of the sequence obtained after the second iteration. And so on; the operations of bitwise exclusive OR and bitwise OR alternate. In the end, she obtains a sequence consisting of one element, and that element is v. Let's consider an example. Suppose that sequence a = (1, 2, 3, 4). Then let's write down all the transformations (1, 2, 3, 4) → (1 or 2 = 3, 3 or 4 = 7) → (3 xor 7 = 4). The result is v = 4. You are given Xenia's initial sequence. But to calculate value v for a given sequence would be too easy, so you are given additional m queries. Each query is a pair of integers p, b. Query p, b means that you need to perform the assignment ap = b. After each query, you need to print the new value v for the new sequence a. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (1 ≤ n ≤ 17, 1 ≤ m ≤ 105). The next line contains 2n integers a1, a2, ..., a2n (0 ≤ ai < 230). Each of the next m lines contains queries. The i-th line contains integers pi, bi (1 ≤ pi ≤ 2n, 0 ≤ bi < 230) — the i-th query. Output Print m integers — the i-th integer denotes value v for sequence a after the i-th query. Examples Input 2 4 1 6 3 5 1 4 3 4 1 2 1 2 Output 1 3 3 3 Note For more information on the bit operations, you can follow this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitwise_operation
instruction
0
10,295
12
20,590
Tags: data structures, trees Correct Solution: ``` ''' Code from : AKASH KUMAR BHAGAT(akay_99) ''' #------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ''' from sys import stdin, stdout def input(): return stdin.readline().rstrip() ''' #-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ''' #For PYPY 2.7 #Dont forget to change the print statments from sys import stdin, stdout import sys range = xrange input = raw_input def input(): return stdin.readline().rstrip() ''' #----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #!/usr/bin/env python import os import sys from io import BytesIO, IOBase BUFSIZE = 8192 class FastIO(IOBase): newlines = 0 def __init__(self, file): self._fd = file.fileno() self.buffer = BytesIO() self.writable = "x" in file.mode or "r" not in file.mode self.write = self.buffer.write if self.writable else None def read(self): while True: b = os.read(self._fd, max(os.fstat(self._fd).st_size, BUFSIZE)) if not b: break ptr = self.buffer.tell() self.buffer.seek(0, 2), self.buffer.write(b), self.buffer.seek(ptr) self.newlines = 0 return self.buffer.read() def readline(self): while self.newlines == 0: b = os.read(self._fd, max(os.fstat(self._fd).st_size, BUFSIZE)) self.newlines = b.count(b"\n") + (not b) ptr = self.buffer.tell() self.buffer.seek(0, 2), self.buffer.write(b), self.buffer.seek(ptr) self.newlines -= 1 return self.buffer.readline() def flush(self): if self.writable: os.write(self._fd, self.buffer.getvalue()) self.buffer.truncate(0), self.buffer.seek(0) class IOWrapper(IOBase): def __init__(self, file): self.buffer = FastIO(file) self.flush = self.buffer.flush self.writable = self.buffer.writable self.write = lambda s: self.buffer.write(s.encode("ascii")) self.read = lambda: self.buffer.read().decode("ascii") self.readline = lambda: self.buffer.readline().decode("ascii") sys.stdin, sys.stdout = IOWrapper(sys.stdin), IOWrapper(sys.stdout) input = lambda: sys.stdin.readline().rstrip("\r\n") # endregion #--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #CODE HERE def assign(): for i in range(x,len(a)+x): seg[i]=a[i-x] def op(c,ind): for i in range(ind,ind*2+1): if(c%2): seg[i]=seg[2*i+1]^seg[2*i+2] else: seg[i]=seg[2*i+1]| seg[2*i+2] if(ind==0): return op(c+1,ind//2) def update(p,val): pos=x+p-1 seg[pos]=val def cal(c,ind): #print(ind,c) i=ind if(c%2): seg[i]=seg[2*i+1]^seg[2*i+2] else: seg[i]=seg[2*i+1]| seg[2*i+2] if(i==0): return 1 cal(c+1,(ind-1)//2) cal(0,(pos-1)//2) def built(): assign() op(0,(len(a)-1)//2) n,m=[int(i) for i in input().split()] a=[int(i) for i in input().split()] seg=[-1]*(2**(n+1)) x=len(a)-1 built() for _ in range(m): p,b=[int(i) for i in input().split()] update(p,b) print(seg[0]) ```
output
1
10,295
12
20,591
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Xenia the beginner programmer has a sequence a, consisting of 2n non-negative integers: a1, a2, ..., a2n. Xenia is currently studying bit operations. To better understand how they work, Xenia decided to calculate some value v for a. Namely, it takes several iterations to calculate value v. At the first iteration, Xenia writes a new sequence a1 or a2, a3 or a4, ..., a2n - 1 or a2n, consisting of 2n - 1 elements. In other words, she writes down the bit-wise OR of adjacent elements of sequence a. At the second iteration, Xenia writes the bitwise exclusive OR of adjacent elements of the sequence obtained after the first iteration. At the third iteration Xenia writes the bitwise OR of the adjacent elements of the sequence obtained after the second iteration. And so on; the operations of bitwise exclusive OR and bitwise OR alternate. In the end, she obtains a sequence consisting of one element, and that element is v. Let's consider an example. Suppose that sequence a = (1, 2, 3, 4). Then let's write down all the transformations (1, 2, 3, 4) → (1 or 2 = 3, 3 or 4 = 7) → (3 xor 7 = 4). The result is v = 4. You are given Xenia's initial sequence. But to calculate value v for a given sequence would be too easy, so you are given additional m queries. Each query is a pair of integers p, b. Query p, b means that you need to perform the assignment ap = b. After each query, you need to print the new value v for the new sequence a. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (1 ≤ n ≤ 17, 1 ≤ m ≤ 105). The next line contains 2n integers a1, a2, ..., a2n (0 ≤ ai < 230). Each of the next m lines contains queries. The i-th line contains integers pi, bi (1 ≤ pi ≤ 2n, 0 ≤ bi < 230) — the i-th query. Output Print m integers — the i-th integer denotes value v for sequence a after the i-th query. Examples Input 2 4 1 6 3 5 1 4 3 4 1 2 1 2 Output 1 3 3 3 Note For more information on the bit operations, you can follow this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitwise_operation
instruction
0
10,296
12
20,592
Tags: data structures, trees Correct Solution: ``` import sys, os, io def rs(): return sys.stdin.readline().rstrip() def ri(): return int(sys.stdin.readline()) def ria(): return list(map(int, sys.stdin.readline().split())) def ws(s): sys.stdout.write(s + '\n') def wi(n): sys.stdout.write(str(n) + '\n') def wia(a): sys.stdout.write(' '.join([str(x) for x in a]) + '\n') import math,datetime,functools,itertools,operator,bisect,fractions,statistics from collections import deque,defaultdict,OrderedDict,Counter from fractions import Fraction from decimal import Decimal from sys import stdout from heapq import heappush, heappop, heapify ,_heapify_max,_heappop_max,nsmallest,nlargest # sys.setrecursionlimit(111111) INF=999999999999999999999999 alphabets="abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" class SortedList: def __init__(self, iterable=[], _load=200): """Initialize sorted list instance.""" values = sorted(iterable) self._len = _len = len(values) self._load = _load self._lists = _lists = [values[i:i + _load] for i in range(0, _len, _load)] self._list_lens = [len(_list) for _list in _lists] self._mins = [_list[0] for _list in _lists] self._fen_tree = [] self._rebuild = True def _fen_build(self): """Build a fenwick tree instance.""" self._fen_tree[:] = self._list_lens _fen_tree = self._fen_tree for i in range(len(_fen_tree)): if i | i + 1 < len(_fen_tree): _fen_tree[i | i + 1] += _fen_tree[i] self._rebuild = False def _fen_update(self, index, value): """Update `fen_tree[index] += value`.""" if not self._rebuild: _fen_tree = self._fen_tree while index < len(_fen_tree): _fen_tree[index] += value index |= index + 1 def _fen_query(self, end): """Return `sum(_fen_tree[:end])`.""" if self._rebuild: self._fen_build() _fen_tree = self._fen_tree x = 0 while end: x += _fen_tree[end - 1] end &= end - 1 return x def _fen_findkth(self, k): """Return a pair of (the largest `idx` such that `sum(_fen_tree[:idx]) <= k`, `k - sum(_fen_tree[:idx])`).""" _list_lens = self._list_lens if k < _list_lens[0]: return 0, k if k >= self._len - _list_lens[-1]: return len(_list_lens) - 1, k + _list_lens[-1] - self._len if self._rebuild: self._fen_build() _fen_tree = self._fen_tree idx = -1 for d in reversed(range(len(_fen_tree).bit_length())): right_idx = idx + (1 << d) if right_idx < len(_fen_tree) and k >= _fen_tree[right_idx]: idx = right_idx k -= _fen_tree[idx] return idx + 1, k def _delete(self, pos, idx): """Delete value at the given `(pos, idx)`.""" _lists = self._lists _mins = self._mins _list_lens = self._list_lens self._len -= 1 self._fen_update(pos, -1) del _lists[pos][idx] _list_lens[pos] -= 1 if _list_lens[pos]: _mins[pos] = _lists[pos][0] else: del _lists[pos] del _list_lens[pos] del _mins[pos] self._rebuild = True def _loc_left(self, value): """Return an index pair that corresponds to the first position of `value` in the sorted list.""" if not self._len: return 0, 0 _lists = self._lists _mins = self._mins lo, pos = -1, len(_lists) - 1 while lo + 1 < pos: mi = (lo + pos) >> 1 if value <= _mins[mi]: pos = mi else: lo = mi if pos and value <= _lists[pos - 1][-1]: pos -= 1 _list = _lists[pos] lo, idx = -1, len(_list) while lo + 1 < idx: mi = (lo + idx) >> 1 if value <= _list[mi]: idx = mi else: lo = mi return pos, idx def _loc_right(self, value): """Return an index pair that corresponds to the last position of `value` in the sorted list.""" if not self._len: return 0, 0 _lists = self._lists _mins = self._mins pos, hi = 0, len(_lists) while pos + 1 < hi: mi = (pos + hi) >> 1 if value < _mins[mi]: hi = mi else: pos = mi _list = _lists[pos] lo, idx = -1, len(_list) while lo + 1 < idx: mi = (lo + idx) >> 1 if value < _list[mi]: idx = mi else: lo = mi return pos, idx def add(self, value): """Add `value` to sorted list.""" _load = self._load _lists = self._lists _mins = self._mins _list_lens = self._list_lens self._len += 1 if _lists: pos, idx = self._loc_right(value) self._fen_update(pos, 1) _list = _lists[pos] _list.insert(idx, value) _list_lens[pos] += 1 _mins[pos] = _list[0] if _load + _load < len(_list): _lists.insert(pos + 1, _list[_load:]) _list_lens.insert(pos + 1, len(_list) - _load) _mins.insert(pos + 1, _list[_load]) _list_lens[pos] = _load del _list[_load:] self._rebuild = True else: _lists.append([value]) _mins.append(value) _list_lens.append(1) self._rebuild = True def discard(self, value): """Remove `value` from sorted list if it is a member.""" _lists = self._lists if _lists: pos, idx = self._loc_right(value) if idx and _lists[pos][idx - 1] == value: self._delete(pos, idx - 1) def remove(self, value): """Remove `value` from sorted list; `value` must be a member.""" _len = self._len self.discard(value) if _len == self._len: raise ValueError('{0!r} not in list'.format(value)) def pop(self, index=-1): """Remove and return value at `index` in sorted list.""" pos, idx = self._fen_findkth(self._len + index if index < 0 else index) value = self._lists[pos][idx] self._delete(pos, idx) return value def bisect_left(self, value): """Return the first index to insert `value` in the sorted list.""" pos, idx = self._loc_left(value) return self._fen_query(pos) + idx def bisect_right(self, value): """Return the last index to insert `value` in the sorted list.""" pos, idx = self._loc_right(value) return self._fen_query(pos) + idx def count(self, value): """Return number of occurrences of `value` in the sorted list.""" return self.bisect_right(value) - self.bisect_left(value) def __len__(self): """Return the size of the sorted list.""" return self._len def __getitem__(self, index): """Lookup value at `index` in sorted list.""" pos, idx = self._fen_findkth(self._len + index if index < 0 else index) return self._lists[pos][idx] def __delitem__(self, index): """Remove value at `index` from sorted list.""" pos, idx = self._fen_findkth(self._len + index if index < 0 else index) self._delete(pos, idx) def __contains__(self, value): """Return true if `value` is an element of the sorted list.""" _lists = self._lists if _lists: pos, idx = self._loc_left(value) return idx < len(_lists[pos]) and _lists[pos][idx] == value return False def __iter__(self): """Return an iterator over the sorted list.""" return (value for _list in self._lists for value in _list) def __reversed__(self): """Return a reverse iterator over the sorted list.""" return (value for _list in reversed(self._lists) for value in reversed(_list)) def __repr__(self): """Return string representation of sorted list.""" return 'SortedList({0})'.format(list(self)) class SegTree: def __init__(self, n): self.N = 1 << n.bit_length() self.tree = [0] * (self.N<<1) def update(self, i, j, v): i += self.N j += self.N while i <= j: if i%2==1: self.tree[i] += v if j%2==0: self.tree[j] += v i, j = (i+1) >> 1, (j-1) >> 1 def query(self, i): v = 0 i += self.N while i > 0: v += self.tree[i] i >>= 1 return v def SieveOfEratosthenes(limit): """Returns all primes not greater than limit.""" isPrime = [True]*(limit+1) isPrime[0] = isPrime[1] = False primes = [] for i in range(2, limit+1): if not isPrime[i]:continue primes += [i] for j in range(i*i, limit+1, i): isPrime[j] = False return primes N = 1005 # array to store inverse of 1 to N factorialNumInverse = [None] * (N + 1) # array to precompute inverse of 1! to N! naturalNumInverse = [None] * (N + 1) # array to store factorial of # first N numbers fact = [None] * (N + 1) # Function to precompute inverse of numbers def InverseofNumber(p): naturalNumInverse[0] = naturalNumInverse[1] = 1 for i in range(2, N + 1, 1): naturalNumInverse[i] = (naturalNumInverse[p % i] * (p - int(p / i)) % p) # Function to precompute inverse # of factorials def InverseofFactorial(p): factorialNumInverse[0] = factorialNumInverse[1] = 1 # precompute inverse of natural numbers for i in range(2, N + 1, 1): factorialNumInverse[i] = (naturalNumInverse[i] * factorialNumInverse[i - 1]) % p # Function to calculate factorial of 1 to N def factorial(p): fact[0] = 1 # precompute factorials for i in range(1, N + 1): fact[i] = (fact[i - 1] * i) % p # Function to return nCr % p in O(1) time def Binomial(N, R, p): # n C r = n!*inverse(r!)*inverse((n-r)!) ans = ((fact[N] * factorialNumInverse[R])% p * factorialNumInverse[N - R])% p return ans def main(): mod=1000000007 InverseofNumber(mod) InverseofFactorial(mod) factorial(mod) starttime=datetime.datetime.now() if(os.path.exists('input.txt')): sys.stdin = open("input.txt","r") sys.stdout = open("output.txt","w") ###CODE tc = 1 for _ in range(tc): n,q=ria() a=ria() pow2sum={} s=0 for i in range(n,-1,-1): s+=2**i pow2sum[s]=1 tree=a.copy() i=0 t=0 la=2**n while i+1<len(tree): if t==0: tree.append(tree[i]|tree[i+1]) else: tree.append(tree[i]^tree[i+1]) if len(tree) in pow2sum: t=1-t i+=2 tree=tree[::-1] # Note: # if i even i's parent is (i-2)//2 # if i odd i's parent is (i-1)//2 # if i even i's brother is (i-1) # if i odd i's brother is (i+1) # Now lets go for i in range(q): posn,b=ria() initialpos=len(tree)-posn tree[initialpos]=b t=0 while initialpos!=0: if initialpos%2: brotherpos=initialpos+1 parentpos=(initialpos-1)//2 else: brotherpos=initialpos-1 parentpos=(initialpos-2)//2 if t==0: tree[parentpos]=tree[initialpos]|tree[brotherpos] else: tree[parentpos]=tree[initialpos]^tree[brotherpos] t=1-t initialpos=parentpos wi(tree[0]) #<--Solving Area Ends endtime=datetime.datetime.now() time=(endtime-starttime).total_seconds()*1000 if(os.path.exists('input.txt')): print("Time:",time,"ms") class FastReader(io.IOBase): newlines = 0 def __init__(self, fd, chunk_size=1024 * 8): self._fd = fd self._chunk_size = chunk_size self.buffer = io.BytesIO() def read(self): while True: b = os.read(self._fd, max(os.fstat(self._fd).st_size, self._chunk_size)) if not b: break ptr = self.buffer.tell() self.buffer.seek(0, 2), self.buffer.write(b), self.buffer.seek(ptr) self.newlines = 0 return self.buffer.read() def readline(self, size=-1): while self.newlines == 0: b = os.read(self._fd, max(os.fstat(self._fd).st_size, self._chunk_size if size == -1 else size)) self.newlines = b.count(b"\n") + (not b) ptr = self.buffer.tell() self.buffer.seek(0, 2), self.buffer.write(b), self.buffer.seek(ptr) self.newlines -= 1 return self.buffer.readline() class FastWriter(io.IOBase): def __init__(self, fd): self._fd = fd self.buffer = io.BytesIO() self.write = self.buffer.write def flush(self): os.write(self._fd, self.buffer.getvalue()) self.buffer.truncate(0), self.buffer.seek(0) class FastStdin(io.IOBase): def __init__(self, fd=0): self.buffer = FastReader(fd) self.read = lambda: self.buffer.read().decode("ascii") self.readline = lambda: self.buffer.readline().decode("ascii") class FastStdout(io.IOBase): def __init__(self, fd=1): self.buffer = FastWriter(fd) self.write = lambda s: self.buffer.write(s.encode("ascii")) self.flush = self.buffer.flush if __name__ == '__main__': sys.stdin = FastStdin() sys.stdout = FastStdout() main() ```
output
1
10,296
12
20,593
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Xenia the beginner programmer has a sequence a, consisting of 2n non-negative integers: a1, a2, ..., a2n. Xenia is currently studying bit operations. To better understand how they work, Xenia decided to calculate some value v for a. Namely, it takes several iterations to calculate value v. At the first iteration, Xenia writes a new sequence a1 or a2, a3 or a4, ..., a2n - 1 or a2n, consisting of 2n - 1 elements. In other words, she writes down the bit-wise OR of adjacent elements of sequence a. At the second iteration, Xenia writes the bitwise exclusive OR of adjacent elements of the sequence obtained after the first iteration. At the third iteration Xenia writes the bitwise OR of the adjacent elements of the sequence obtained after the second iteration. And so on; the operations of bitwise exclusive OR and bitwise OR alternate. In the end, she obtains a sequence consisting of one element, and that element is v. Let's consider an example. Suppose that sequence a = (1, 2, 3, 4). Then let's write down all the transformations (1, 2, 3, 4) → (1 or 2 = 3, 3 or 4 = 7) → (3 xor 7 = 4). The result is v = 4. You are given Xenia's initial sequence. But to calculate value v for a given sequence would be too easy, so you are given additional m queries. Each query is a pair of integers p, b. Query p, b means that you need to perform the assignment ap = b. After each query, you need to print the new value v for the new sequence a. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (1 ≤ n ≤ 17, 1 ≤ m ≤ 105). The next line contains 2n integers a1, a2, ..., a2n (0 ≤ ai < 230). Each of the next m lines contains queries. The i-th line contains integers pi, bi (1 ≤ pi ≤ 2n, 0 ≤ bi < 230) — the i-th query. Output Print m integers — the i-th integer denotes value v for sequence a after the i-th query. Examples Input 2 4 1 6 3 5 1 4 3 4 1 2 1 2 Output 1 3 3 3 Note For more information on the bit operations, you can follow this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitwise_operation
instruction
0
10,297
12
20,594
Tags: data structures, trees Correct Solution: ``` import sys input=sys.stdin.readline import math # sys.setrecursionlimit(10**9) def construct(array,cur_pos,tree,start,end): if(start==end): # print(cur_pos,"pppp",array[start]) tree[cur_pos]=array[start] else: mid=(start+end)//2 w=(n1-int(math.log2(cur_pos+1))) # print(w,n1,cur_pos+1) if(w%2!=0): # print(cur_pos,w) tree[cur_pos]=(construct(array,2*cur_pos+1,tree,start,mid)|construct(array,2*cur_pos+2,tree,mid+1,end)) else: # print(cur_pos,w) tree[cur_pos]=(construct(array,2*cur_pos+1,tree,start,mid)^construct(array,2*cur_pos+2,tree,mid+1,end)) return tree[cur_pos] def update(cur_pos,l,r,index,increment): # print(tree) if(l<=index<=r): if(l==r): tree[cur_pos]=increment else: mid=(l+r)//2 w=(n1-int(math.log2(cur_pos+1))) if(w%2!=0): update(2*cur_pos+1,l,mid,index,increment) update(2*cur_pos+2,mid+1,r,index,increment) tree[cur_pos]=tree[2*cur_pos+1]|tree[2*cur_pos+2] else: update(2*cur_pos+1,l,mid,index,increment) update(2*cur_pos+2,mid+1,r,index,increment) tree[cur_pos]=tree[2*cur_pos+1]^tree[2*cur_pos+2] return tree[cur_pos] return 0 l= list(map(int,input().split())) l1=list(map(int,input().split())) n=(2**(l[0])) tree=[0]*(2**(l[0]+1)-1) n1=int(math.log2(len(tree))) # print(n1,n,"llll") construct(l1,0,tree,0,n-1) # print(tree) for i in range(l[1]): # print(tree) l2=list(map(int,input().split())) update(0,0,n-1,l2[0]-1,l2[1]) # print(tree,"ppp") print(tree[0]) ```
output
1
10,297
12
20,595
Provide tags and a correct Python 3 solution for this coding contest problem. Xenia the beginner programmer has a sequence a, consisting of 2n non-negative integers: a1, a2, ..., a2n. Xenia is currently studying bit operations. To better understand how they work, Xenia decided to calculate some value v for a. Namely, it takes several iterations to calculate value v. At the first iteration, Xenia writes a new sequence a1 or a2, a3 or a4, ..., a2n - 1 or a2n, consisting of 2n - 1 elements. In other words, she writes down the bit-wise OR of adjacent elements of sequence a. At the second iteration, Xenia writes the bitwise exclusive OR of adjacent elements of the sequence obtained after the first iteration. At the third iteration Xenia writes the bitwise OR of the adjacent elements of the sequence obtained after the second iteration. And so on; the operations of bitwise exclusive OR and bitwise OR alternate. In the end, she obtains a sequence consisting of one element, and that element is v. Let's consider an example. Suppose that sequence a = (1, 2, 3, 4). Then let's write down all the transformations (1, 2, 3, 4) → (1 or 2 = 3, 3 or 4 = 7) → (3 xor 7 = 4). The result is v = 4. You are given Xenia's initial sequence. But to calculate value v for a given sequence would be too easy, so you are given additional m queries. Each query is a pair of integers p, b. Query p, b means that you need to perform the assignment ap = b. After each query, you need to print the new value v for the new sequence a. Input The first line contains two integers n and m (1 ≤ n ≤ 17, 1 ≤ m ≤ 105). The next line contains 2n integers a1, a2, ..., a2n (0 ≤ ai < 230). Each of the next m lines contains queries. The i-th line contains integers pi, bi (1 ≤ pi ≤ 2n, 0 ≤ bi < 230) — the i-th query. Output Print m integers — the i-th integer denotes value v for sequence a after the i-th query. Examples Input 2 4 1 6 3 5 1 4 3 4 1 2 1 2 Output 1 3 3 3 Note For more information on the bit operations, you can follow this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitwise_operation
instruction
0
10,298
12
20,596
Tags: data structures, trees Correct Solution: ``` from operator import or_, xor import sys greg=1 #Stolen from tchr to test Xenia and Bit Operations speed. n, m = map(int, input().split()) t = [list(map(int, input().split()))] for i in range(n): t += [[(or_, xor)[i & 1](*t[i][j: j + 2]) for j in range(0, len(t[i]), 2)]] for s in sys.stdin: p, b = s.split() p = int(p) - 1 t[0][p] = int(b) for j in range(n): p >>= 1 t[j + 1][p] = (or_, xor)[j & 1](*t[j][p << 1: (p << 1) + 2]) print(t[-1][0]) ```
output
1
10,298
12
20,597