license: cc-by-4.0
dataset_info:
features:
- name: image_id
dtype: string
- name: dataset
dtype: string
- name: question
dtype: string
- name: answer
dtype: string
- name: program
dtype: string
- name: reasoning_trace
dtype: string
- name: supporting_features
dtype: string
- name: category
dtype: string
- name: difficulty
dtype: int32
- name: verification_attempts
dtype: int32
- name: verified
dtype: bool
- name: file_name
dtype: string
- name: mask_file_name
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_examples: 1500
SegVQA — Symbolically-Verified VQA Benchmark (v11 labels, n=1500)
Executable & symbolically-verified medical VQA benchmark generated from real polyp segmentation masks. 500 verified-sampled items per dataset across Kvasir-SEG, CVC-ClinicDB, and ETIS-LaribPolypDB.
Contents
benchmarks/segvqa_benchmark_{kvasir,cvc,etis}.json— the three 500-item benchmarks (1500 total), each item carrying:image_id,question,answer, executable DSLprogram,reasoning_trace,supporting_features(per-lesion geometry/appearance/ position),category,difficulty(program depth), and the symbolically-verifiedverifiedlabel.images/{kvasir,cvc,etis,etis-composites}/...— endoscopy images referenced byfile_name. ETIS comparison/multi-hop items run on synthetic composites (Poisson blending), stored separately underetis-compositesfor the organic-vs-composited subset split required by the evaluation protocol.masks/{...}— the ground-truth segmentation masks referenced bymask_file_name.
Verified counts (v11 labels)
| dataset | items | verified | unverified |
|---|---|---|---|
| kvasir | 500 | 480 | 20 |
| cvc | 500 | 476 | 24 |
| etis | 500 | 469 | 31 |
Labels were regenerated with the audited symbolic verifier (Entries 40-43): word-boundary boolean matching, comparator refusal guard, and a global refusal guard so a text-only refusal ("cannot determine", "without knowing", "no definitive answer") scores UNEXTRACTABLE for all slot types. A question-only prior cannot earn a lucky PASS from keywords inside its refusal text.
Evaluation protocol (Stage 9 VLM)
Per the project design, report for EACH model:
- Per-category accuracy (morphology, counting, localization, comparison, existence_detection, multi_hop) — not just overall accuracy.
- Hallucination-type breakdown — counting / spatial / shape / relational / unsupported-statement, via the mismatch classifier on extracted slots.
- Accuracy vs. difficulty — correlation with
difficulty(program depth), the empirical backing for the DSL depth metric. - Organic-vs-composited split — CVC/ETIS comparison & multi-hop items reported
separately for organic vs.
etis-compositessubsets (artifact detector labels each ETIS item; composite detectability must be disclosed). - Calibration — confidence vs. correctness.
Model disjointness constraint: all Stage 9 VLMs must be disjoint from the
Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct text-only model used to generate the questions/answers in Stage 3.
This avoids the circularity already controlled for in the B1/B1b question-only baselines.
Provenance & license
- Kvasir-SEG (Jha et al., MICCAI 2020, CC BY 4.0) — 345 images in the benchmark subset.
- CVC-ClinicDB (Bernal et al., 2015) — 283 images.
- ETIS-LaribPolypDB (Silva et al., 2014) — 132 organic + 133 composite images.
- Questions, answers, programs, traces, and
verifiedlabels were produced by the SegVQA pipeline (DSL sampling → LLM paraphrase → independent symbolic verifier). Composite images are synthetic multi-lesion composites for quota filling; the artifact detector reports 0.944 accuracy distinguishing composited vs. organic frames (transparency check).
Quick start (other-server eval)
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("AiventraLab/segvqa-benchmark", split="train")
# image for item i:
img = ds[i]["file_name"]
# to load the actual image:
from PIL import Image
im = Image.open(f"https://huggingface.co/datasets/AiventraLab/segvqa-benchmark/resolve/main/{img}")
Or git lfs pull / hf download AiventraLab/segvqa-benchmark to mirror the whole dataset.