judgement stringlengths 593 808k | dataset_name stringclasses 3
values | summary stringlengths 0 158k | text stringlengths 1.44k 967k |
|---|---|---|---|
Appeal No. LXVI of 1949.
Appeal from the High Court of judicature, Bombay, in a reference under section 66 of the Indian Income tax Act, 1022.
K.M. Munshi (N. P. Nathvani, with him), for the appel lant. ' M.C. Setalvad, Attorney General for India (H. J. Umrigar, with him), for the respondent. 1950.
May 26.
The judgment... | IN-Abs | The charge created in respect of municipal property tax by section 212 of the City of Bombay Municipal Act, 1888, is an "annual charge not being a capital charge" within the mean ing of section 9 (1) (iv) of the Indian Income tax Act, 199.2, and the amount of such charge should therefore be deducted in computing the in... | <s>[INST] Summarize the following judgement: Appeal No. LXVI of 1949.
Appeal from the High Court of judicature, Bombay, in a reference under section 66 of the Indian Income tax Act, 1022.
K.M. Munshi (N. P. Nathvani, with him), for the appel lant. ' M.C. Setalvad, Attorney General for India (H. J. Umrigar, with him), f... |
Civil Appeal No.94 of 1949.
107 834 Appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court of Judi cature at Patna in Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 97 of 1946 (Mannohar Lall and Mukherji JJ.) dated 23rd Decem ber, 1947, confirming the judgment of the District Judge of Purulia in Appeal No. 159 of 1944.
S.P. Sinha (P. K... | IN-Abs | An agreement for a lease, which a lease is by the Indian declared to include, must be a document which effects an actual demise and operates as a lease.
It must create present and immediate interest in land.
Where a litigation between two persons A and B who claimed to be tenants under C was settled by a compromise dec... | <s>[INST] Summarize the following judgement: Civil Appeal No.94 of 1949.
107 834 Appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court of Judi cature at Patna in Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 97 of 1946 (Mannohar Lall and Mukherji JJ.) dated 23rd Decem ber, 1947, confirming the judgment of the District Judge of Puruli... |
iminal Appeal No. 40 of 1951, 127 Appeal from the Judgment and Order dated the 1st June, 1951, of the High Court of Judicature in Assam (Thadani C.J. and Ram Labhaya J.,) in Criminal Reference No. I of 1951, arising out of Judgment and Order dated the 15th November, 1950, of the Court of the Additional District Magistr... | IN-Abs | The question whether a Magistrate is "personally interested" in a ease within the meaning of section 556, Criminal Procedure Code, has essentially to be decided the facts of each case.
Where an officer as a District Magistrate exercising his powers under section 7(1) of the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 19... | <s>[INST] Summarize the following judgement: iminal Appeal No. 40 of 1951, 127 Appeal from the Judgment and Order dated the 1st June, 1951, of the High Court of Judicature in Assam (Thadani C.J. and Ram Labhaya J.,) in Criminal Reference No. I of 1951, arising out of Judgment and Order dated the 15th November, 1950, of... |
Appeal No. 388 of 1960.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated February 3, 1959, of the Patna High Court in Election Appeal No. 10 of 1958.
section P. Varma, for the appellant.
L. K. Jha and D. Govardhan, for respondent No. 1.
L. K. Jha and K. K. Sinha, for respondent No. 2. 1960.
November 17.
The Ju... | IN-Abs | The appellant was a member of a joint Hindu family which carried on the business of Government stockists of grain under a contract with the Government of Bihar.
His nomination for election to the Bihar Legislative Assembly was rejected on the ground that he was disqualified under section 7(d) of the Representation of t... | <s>[INST] Summarize the following judgement: Appeal No. 388 of 1960.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated February 3, 1959, of the Patna High Court in Election Appeal No. 10 of 1958.
section P. Varma, for the appellant.
L. K. Jha and D. Govardhan, for respondent No. 1.
L. K. Jha and K. K. Sinha, fo... |
Appeal No. 198 of 1954.
Appeal from the judgment and order dated October 16, 1952, of the former Nagpur High Court in Misc. Petn.; No. 1231 of 1951.
M. section K. Sastri, for the appellant.
H. L. Khaskalam, B. K. B. Naidu and I. N. Shroff, for the respondent.
64 502 1960.
November 18.
The Judgment of the Court was deli... | IN-Abs | The appellant was the Ruler of the State of Baster which was later integrated with the State of Madhya Pradesh.
He was recognised by the President as a Ruler under article 366(22) of the Constitution.
The respondent resumed certain lands belonging to the appellant under the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Right... | <s>[INST] Summarize the following judgement: Appeal No. 198 of 1954.
Appeal from the judgment and order dated October 16, 1952, of the former Nagpur High Court in Misc. Petn.; No. 1231 of 1951.
M. section K. Sastri, for the appellant.
H. L. Khaskalam, B. K. B. Naidu and I. N. Shroff, for the respondent.
64 502 1960.
No... |
"Appeals Nos. 155 to 160 of 1956.\nAppeals from the judgments and orders of the Bombay High Court da(...TRUNCATED) | IN-Abs | "The appellants held personal inams which were governed by Bombay Acts Nos.\nII and VII of 1863 by v(...TRUNCATED) | "<s>[INST] Summarize the following judgement: Appeals Nos. 155 to 160 of 1956.\nAppeals from the jud(...TRUNCATED) |
"iminal Appeal No. 68 of 1958.\nAppeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated July 11, 1(...TRUNCATED) | IN-Abs | "The appellant, who was working as a Loco Foreman, was found to have accepted a sum of Rs. 375 from (...TRUNCATED) | "<s>[INST] Summarize the following judgement: iminal Appeal No. 68 of 1958.\nAppeal by special leave(...TRUNCATED) |
"minal Appeal No. 124 of 1959.\nAppeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated June 19 an(...TRUNCATED) | IN-Abs | "During the search of the premises of the appellant No. 1 a complete working still was found which w(...TRUNCATED) | "<s>[INST] Summarize the following judgement: minal Appeal No. 124 of 1959.\nAppeal by special leave(...TRUNCATED) |
"Appeal No. 198 of 1954.\nAppeal from the judgment and order dated October 16, 1952, of the former N(...TRUNCATED) | IN-Abs | "The appellant was the Ruler of the State of Baster which was later integrated with the State of Mad(...TRUNCATED) | "<s>[INST] Summarize the following judgement: Appeal No. 198 of 1954.\nAppeal from the judgment and (...TRUNCATED) |
"Appeal No. 285 of 1959.\nAppeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Decree dated the 13th July, (...TRUNCATED) | IN-Abs | "The appellant Corporation was assessed to sales tax under section 13(5) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act,(...TRUNCATED) | "<s>[INST] Summarize the following judgement: Appeal No. 285 of 1959.\nAppeal by Special Leave from (...TRUNCATED) |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 7