text stringlengths 571 40.6k | label int64 0 1 |
|---|---|
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 1 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Let \(C\) be a smooth complex projective surface polarized by an ample line bundle \(L\). In the paper under review the relations between the sectional genus \(g(L)\) and the irregularity \(q(X)\) are investigated under the assumption that \(L\) is \(k\)-very ample, i.e., for any 0-dimensional subscheme \((Z,{\mathcal ... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.