Datasets:

---

AnnaWegmann

/

StyleEmbeddingData

Like 2

ERROR: type should be string, got "https://youtu.be/c9txqfadfd0?t=1311\n\nPaul Offit admits only 17 studies **total** have been done on vaccines and autism. \n\nhttps://youtu.be/uNWTOmEi_6A?t=159\n\nOf those 17, we know for a fact 2 of them can be thrown into the garbage bin because they were conducted by a now wanted criminal Poul Thornsen, who stole money from those funds, why would you ever trust him with the safety of your children? Hes never had his data verified. What does the CDC say about that? \"It's only 2 studies\", that is still about 11% of all studies looking into vaccines and autism.\n\nWe have another study that be can be thrown out because it has a whistle blower speaking out against it, William Thompson who says **they actively destroyed data** in order to get results they wanted. \n\nhttps://youtu.be/jGRjn_gIJw0?t=234\n\n>The co authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining 4 co authors all met and **brought a big garbage can into the meeting room** and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and **put them in a huge garbage can**. However, because **I assumed it was illegal** and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests I kept hard copies of all documents in my office and I retained all associated computer files. **I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings** from the final draft of the pediatrics paper\"\n\nWhat does the IOM say on this matter? \n\n>The committee reviewed one study to evaluate the risk of autism after the administration of DTaP vaccine. This one study (Geier and Geier, 2004) was not considered in the weight of epidemiologic evidence because it provided data from a passive surveillance system and **lacked an unvaccinated comparison population.**\n\nSo it lacked an unvaccinated comparison and therefore cannot be used? What about **EVERY OTHER SAFETY STUDY THAT DOES NOT USE A UNVACCINATED COMPARISON?** They low-key just completely said every vaccine safety study in existence is unusable because they lack an unvaccinated comparison. \n\nSo they say that the only study that's looked into the vaccine and found a link is unusable because it uses data from VAERS which doesn't work so I guess we can say we have no working injury reporting system as well. But they continue on. \n\n>The epidemiologic evidence is insufficient or absent to assess an association between diphtheria toxoid–, tetanus toxoid–, or acellular pertussis–containing vaccine and autism.\n\nSo **there is no data disproving DTaP and autism**? I heard there were millions of studies that looked into it, billions even. Where are the studies here? Oh right, **they've only looked into 1 ingredient in 1 vaccine for autism**, I'll let J.B Handley do the rest of the talking here. \n\nhttps://youtu.be/MEmVLzhYmYY?t=140\n\nSo only the Thimerosal in the MMR has been studied, you will not find any other study that looks more deeply into it that is not controversial and viciously attacked by the industry and media. \n\nSo you're going to stand there, tell me vaccines and autism are unrelated when you've done 17 studies, of which only 14 are usable on 1 ingredient in 1 vaccine? It's disgusting that you would stand there and say you are pro-vaccine and speaking as if \"the science is settled\" you only think that because you've stuck your head in the sand. \n\n**Shame on you.**\n\nEDIT: fixed some grammar\n\n"