Datasets:

Ashima
/

task738_augmented_constraint_satisfaction_Mar16-1525

original_problem stringlengths 162 952	original_solution stringclasses 6 values	augmented_problem stringlengths 361 1.76k	augmented_solution stringclasses 8 values	distractor_metadata dict
Problem: Statement: Claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society. Perspective: Inherited wealth demotivates the recipients so that they put less effort into training, education and social skills. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? If the persp...	A	Problem: Statement: Claim: Children should not be allowed to inherit vast wealth as this damages them and society. Perspective: Inherited wealth demotivates the recipients so that they put less effort into training, education and social skills. For the purposes of this evaluation, assume the inheritance described is tr...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added explicit constraints about the type of inheritance (unconditional lump sum, no conditional clauses or offsetting taxes) that the evaluator must track when applying the perspective.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "estimated_difficul...
Statement: Claim: Domestic intelligence agencies have a legitimate role to play in democracy. Perspective: The government does not have the right to spy on its citizens. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Question: Does the pers...	undermine	Statement: Claim: Domestic intelligence agencies have a legitimate role to play in democracy. Perspective: The government does not have the right to spy on its citizens. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Constraint (for evaluat...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added explicit constraints about the evaluative audience's dispositions and the definition of 'spy' that the reasoner must track when applying the rule.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate — forces t...
Statement: Claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU. Perspective: As a matter of precedent, Turkey should be allowed into the EU. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option. (A) Support (B) Undermine	A	Statement: Claim: Should Turkey Be Accepted In The EU. Perspective: As a matter of precedent, Turkey should be allowed into the EU. For the purposes of judging whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim, assume that the term "precedent" is restricted only to previous EU admission decisions and that other ...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Introduces an additional constraint that 'precedent' is limited to prior EU admission decisions and instructs the evaluator to ignore other considerations, requiring the solver to track these constraints while not altering the logical relation between perspecti...
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: arming police will not help violence. Respond with either the single word support or undermine.	undermine	Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Arming the police is a good idea. Perspective: arming police will not help violence. For the purposes of this evaluation, treat the perspective as referring specifically to urban municipal police departments (population over 50,000) a...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added specific scope/timeframe and exclusions (urban departments, one-year effect, ignore budgetary/legal/training/community-trust factors) that the solver must track while reaching the judgment.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "estimated...
Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: There are economic advantages for states to approve gay marriages. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine.	support	Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: There are economic advantages for states to approve gay marriages. For the purposes of this evaluation, treat the phrase "economic advantages" as referring only to short-term, directly mea...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added explicit scope and measurement constraints that the solver must track (short-term, directly measurable fiscal impacts only; population filter), increasing tracking burden without changing the logical relation between the perspective and the claim.", ...
Problem: Statement: Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: Legalizing gay marriage is a stepping stone toward disgusting and harmful marriage practices such as incestu...	B	Problem: Statement: Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: Legalizing gay marriage is a stepping stone toward disgusting and harmful marriage practices such as incestu...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added explicit evaluation constraints that the solver must track and apply when deciding whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — the added simu...
Statement: Claim: The use of child performers should be banned. Perspective: Being a performer can make the child physically vulnerable. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine	support	Statement: Claim: The use of child performers should be banned. Perspective: Being a performer can make the child physically vulnerable. Additional constraints: For this evaluation, treat 'physically vulnerable' as indicating an increased risk of physical harm compared with non-performing children, and consider only th...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Adds explicit evaluation constraints that the solver must track (limit scope to physical vulnerability and ignore other factors), increasing cognitive load without changing the core inference.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "estimated_di...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: UK should have a second Brexit referendum before leaving the EU. Perspective: The referendum is inconsistent with the UK's tradition of representative democracy EU membersh. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) under...	B	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: UK should have a second Brexit referendum before leaving the EU. Perspective: The referendum is inconsistent with the UK's tradition of representative democracy EU membersh. When answering, apply the following constraints: interpret 'referendum' strictly as a n...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Adds extra interpretive constraints the solver must track (scope of 'referendum', timing 'before leaving the EU', and restriction to the perspective's explicit reasoning), increasing bookkeeping without changing the perspective's direction.", "name": "Con...
Statement: Claim: Everyone Should Automatically Be Opted into an Organ Donation Scheme. Perspective: Some just don’t bother to register as a donor, even if they support the cause. Question: Based only on the claim and the perspective above, does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word:...	support	Statement: Claim: Everyone Should Automatically Be Opted into an Organ Donation Scheme. Perspective: Some just don’t bother to register as a donor, even if they support the cause. Additional constraint for this evaluation: treat the claim specifically as a policy recommendation to implement an opt-out (automatic enroll...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added explicit constraints about population, policy framing, and interpretation (treating the perspective as a factual behavioral observation and the claim as a policy recommendation) that must be tracked but do not change the logical relation between perspecti...
Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Marriage is an outdated institution. Perspective: Those who are observant religiously think that marriage is important. Choose the best option: (A) Supports (B) Undermines (C) Both supports and undermines (D) Neither supports...	B	Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Marriage is an outdated institution. Perspective: Those who are observant religiously think that marriage is important. Additional constraints: For this evaluation, treat "those who are observant religiously" as a defined sub...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Adds extra constraints for the evaluator to track (subgroup interpretation and prescriptive vs descriptive reading) that do not change the logical relation between the claim and perspective.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "estimated_diff...
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Basic income tax should be abolished. Perspective: Income tax is not the best way to redistribute wealth or pay for public goods. Choose one of two answers exactly support or undermine	support	Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Basic income tax should be abolished. Perspective: Income tax is not the best way to redistribute wealth or pay for public goods. Constraint: For this labeling task, focus strictly on whether the perspective endorses abolishing basic ...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Adds extra interpretation constraints the solver must track when mapping the perspective to support or undermine, without changing the underlying logical relation between the perspective and claim.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "estimat...
Problem: Statement: Given the claim: Junk Food Should Be Banned. And the perspective: The sale of "junk food" items provide vital financial assistance to schools. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine.	undermine	Problem: Statement: Given the claim: Junk Food Should Be Banned. And the perspective: The sale of "junk food" items provide vital financial assistance to schools. For this evaluation, assume you should consider only the direct financial effects of on-campus sales (vending machines, cafeterias, and school stores) on pub...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "A constraint was added that requires the evaluator to consider only the direct financial effects of on-campus sales on local public primary and secondary schools and to ignore broader health or social impacts. This forces the solver to track and apply an extra ...
Statement: Claim: All nations have a right to nuclear weapons. Perspective: No country has an inherent right to invade or use aggression against another. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	support	Statement: Claim: All nations have a right to nuclear weapons. Perspective: No country has an inherent right to invade or use aggression against another. For the purposes of this evaluation, apply these additional constraints simultaneously: consider only sovereign United Nations member states, assume any possession or...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Additional constraints were added that must be tracked when evaluating the relationship: limit to UN member states, assume defensive-only motives for nuclear acquisition, and treat treaties as non-binding for the normative judgment.", "name": "Constraint ...
Statement: Claim: Global Warming is not an issue. Perspective: Because people are losing lives and our climate is changing. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine.	undermine	Statement: Claim: Global Warming is not an issue. Perspective: Because people are losing lives and our climate is changing. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be either support or undermine. Constraints (apply all): (1) Treat the phrase "Global Warming" as referring specific...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added explicit interpretive constraints the solver must track (how to interpret key phrases and label selection rules) that do not change the factual relationship between the perspective and the claim.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "est...
Statement: Claim: We must ban negative advertising in political campaigns. Perspective: Negative campaigns reduce diversity. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with exactly one of the words: support or undermine	support	Statement: Claim: We must ban negative advertising in political campaigns. Perspective: Negative campaigns reduce diversity. Additionally, for the purposes of this evaluation, interpret "diversity" specifically as diversity of viewpoints and candidates, consider only domestic political campaigns, and evaluate based sol...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added extra constraints that the solver must track (definition of 'diversity', scope limited to domestic campaigns, and focus on direct effects), which do not change the logical relation between the perspective and the claim but increase the bookkeeping require...
Statement: Given the claim: "Voting should be compulsory in the UK." and the perspective: "People forced to vote are unlikely to vote intelligently." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines	B	Statement: Given the claim: "Voting should be compulsory in the UK." and the perspective: "People forced to vote are unlikely to vote intelligently." Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines Constraints (apply for this question): treat the claim as referr...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added several explicit constraints (scope limited to national elections, excluded overseas voters, enforcement by fines, no civic-education accompaniment, and an interpretation of 'unlikely to vote intelligently') that the solver must track while answering.", ...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: We should expand NATO. Perspective: NATO development was important for international stability. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one of: support or undermine	support	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Claim: We should expand NATO. Perspective: NATO development was important for international stability. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with exactly one of: support or undermine. Additional constraints for this decision (apply t...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added extra decision-making constraints the solver must track (how to interpret 'important', ignoring costs/feasibility, and limiting scope to only the given claim and perspective). These constraints must be satisfied while making the judgment.", "name": ...
Statement: Claim: Forced marriage should be banned. Perspective: The state should not be allowed to intrude in such personal matters. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with either support or undermine.	undermine	Statement: Claim: Forced marriage should be banned. Perspective: The state should not be allowed to intrude in such personal matters. Constraints: For this evaluation, interpret "state" strictly as civil legislative bodies (not religious institutions or private actors). Interpret "intrude" specifically as the state ena...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added explicit constraints/definitions the solver must track (definitions of 'state', 'intrude', scope of 'forced marriage', and evaluation scope) even though they do not change the logical relation between the perspective and the claim.", "name": "Constr...
Problem: Statement: Claim: The American Jobs Act should pass. Perspective: The American Jobs Act Will Help the Long Term Unemployed. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports and undermines (D) neither supports nor undermines (E) insu...	A	Problem: Statement: Claim: The American Jobs Act should pass. Perspective: The American Jobs Act Will Help the Long Term Unemployed. Evaluation constraints (apply when answering): For this item, assess only the logical relationship between the stated perspective and the claim. Specifically, (1) interpret "help" as "lik...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added explicit evaluation constraints that the responder must track (scope-limiting interpretations and ignores), which are irrelevant to the core support relation but require attention.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "estimated_difficul...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Golf is a Sport. Perspective: If you can compete in golf with a handicap, then it is not a sport. Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim Solution: B	B	Problem: Statement: Claim: Golf is a Sport. Perspective: If you can compete in golf with a handicap, then it is not a sport. Additional constraints (for this evaluation only): treat the perspective's "if...then..." as a logical material implication; assume that "compete in golf with a handicap" is a possible condition ...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added extra formal constraints and assumptions the solver must keep track of while evaluating support vs. undermine (e.g., treating the conditional as a material implication and assuming the antecedent is possible).", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" ...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Studies show that vegetarians are up to 40% less likely to develop cancer than meat eaters. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	support	Problem: Statement: Claim: Everyone should go vegetarian. Perspective: Studies show that vegetarians are up to 40% less likely to develop cancer than meat eaters. For the purpose of this evaluation, assume the 40% figure refers to the relative risk reduction observed in long-term observational studies of adults who hav...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added extra constraints about the nature of the studies (relative risk, long-term adherence, and controlled confounders) that the reader must track, even though they do not change whether the perspective supports the claim.", "name": "Constraint satisfact...
Statement: Claim: Speed limits should be reduced. Perspective: Government have illegitimate reasons behind lowering the speed limit. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports (B) Undermines	B	Statement: Claim: Speed limits should be reduced. Perspective: Government have illegitimate reasons behind lowering the speed limit. Constraint (for this question only): Interpret "reasons" strictly as motives (not as effects or consequences), treat "illegitimate" as indicating non-safety-related motives (for example,...	B Reason: If the government lowering speed limits is motivated by illegitimate (non-safety) reasons, that undercuts the justification for the claim that speed limits should be reduced, so the perspective undermines the claim.	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added several scope and definitional constraints the solver must hold simultaneously (interpretation of 'reasons', meaning of 'illegitimate', scope of roads, and level of government). These constraints must be tracked but do not alter the logical relation betwe...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: Legalizing gay marriage will not harm the institution of marriage, and same-sex marriages may even be more stable than heterosexual marriages. Question: Does the perspective suppo...	support	Problem: Statement: Claim: Same sex relationships should have the same legal status as heterosexual relationships under EU law. Perspective: Legalizing gay marriage will not harm the institution of marriage, and same-sex marriages may even be more stable than heterosexual marriages. Constraints: For the purposes of thi...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added explicit constraints that narrow definitions (civil vs religious marriage, 'harm' limited to legal/institutional impacts, 'stability' defined as divorce/separation rates controlling for demographics, EU-only scope) so the solver must track these extra con...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified. Perspective: It does not address the underlying issues. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option. (A) Supports (B) Undermines Solution: B	B	Problem: Statement: Claim: Positive Discrimination Towards Women in Society Is Justified. Perspective: It does not address the underlying issues. Constraints: For the purposes of evaluating the relationship between the perspective and the claim, interpret "positive discrimination" narrowly as formally implemented poli...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Adds extra interpretive constraints (timeframe, domain, and definitions) that the solver must track but which do not alter the logical relation between the perspective and the claim.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "estimated_difficulty_i...
Problem: Statement: Claim: All drugs should be decriminalised. Perspective: Why is it legitimate for the government to ban drugs Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. 'Supporting' means the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view; 'Undermining' means it coul...	support	Problem: Statement: Claim: All drugs should be decriminalised. Perspective: Why is it legitimate for the government to ban drugs Constraint (to be tracked while evaluating): Simultaneously consider three hypothetical audiences — (A) a liberty-focused individual who prioritises personal freedom, (B) a public-health prof...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added explicit constraints requiring the evaluator to track multiple hypothetical audiences and base the single-word judgment on whether at least one audience could be convinced.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "estimated_difficulty_incre...
Statement: Given the claim and the perspective below, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Teachers Should Have The Right To Punish Pupils Physically If The Parents Consent. Perspective: Allowing children to be hit sends the message that it is OK to treat children in this way. Choose ...	B	Statement: Given the claim and the perspective below, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Teachers Should Have The Right To Punish Pupils Physically If The Parents Consent. Perspective: Allowing children to be hit sends the message that it is OK to treat children in this way. For the...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added extra contextual constraints that the decision-maker must track (written parental consent, non-injurious punishment, trained teachers) even though these conditions do not affect whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.", "name": "Co...
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The world should go vegan. Perspective: The risk of heart disease is reduced in people who adhere to a vegetarian diet. Choose one: (A) Supports the claim (B) Undermines the claim Solution: A	A	Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: The world should go vegan. Perspective: The risk of heart disease is reduced in people who adhere to a vegetarian diet. Additional constraints for evaluation (track these while deciding): Treat 'vegetarian' as inclusive of 'vegan' whe...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Extra evaluative constraints are added (treat 'vegetarian' as inclusive of 'vegan', limit to adult health evidence, ignore non-health arguments) that the solver must track but that do not change the correct label.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" }...
Statement: Claim: The US should immediately close Guantanamo Bay. Perspective: Release is not the Solution. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	undermine	Statement: Claim: The US should immediately close Guantanamo Bay. Perspective: Release is not the Solution. Constraint: For this evaluation, interpret "immediately" strictly as closure within 30 days, consider only the perspective's explicit statements (do not use external historical or author-intent context), and focu...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added extra evaluation constraints that the solver must track (strict temporal interpretation, limit to explicit content, focus on practical arguments) even though they do not change the relation between perspective and claim.", "name": "Constraint satisf...
Statement: Claim: Prostitution Should Be Legal. Perspective: Legalization has benefits for society. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim?	support	Statement: Claim: Prostitution Should Be Legal. Perspective: Legalization has benefits for society. Constraint: For this evaluation, consider only arguments about societal-level outcomes (such as public health, crime rates, economic impact and regulatory effects) and ignore individual moral, religious, or purely person...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added explicit constraints that narrow the domain of acceptable arguments (only societal-level outcomes; assume legalization means regulated and taxed) so the solver must track these conditions while answering.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ...
Statement: Claim: Eliminate All Nuclear Weapons. Perspective: countries have the right to self defense with nuclear weapons, even when they lack capacity in conventional weapons Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Solution: undermine	undermine	Statement: Claim: Eliminate All Nuclear Weapons. Perspective: countries have the right to self defense with nuclear weapons, even when they lack capacity in conventional weapons Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Additional constraints (all must be satisfied simultaneously for the scenario ...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added multiple simultaneous constraints the evaluator must track when judging whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate. The constraints force the ...
Problem: Statement: Claim: 16 year olds should be able to vote at presidental elections. Perspective: 16 year olds are informed enough to cast a vote. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option. Solution: A	A	Problem: Statement: Claim: 16 year olds should be able to vote at presidental elections. Perspective: 16 year olds are informed enough to cast a vote. Additional constraints: For the purpose of this question, interpret 'informed enough' as meaning the average 16-year-old possesses basic civic knowledge and the ability ...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added explicit interpretation and scope constraints (definition of 'informed enough', average vs. all individuals, and instruction to ignore legal/logistical factors) that the solver must track while evaluating the perspective's relation to the claim.", "...
Statement: Claim: Wind power should be a primary focus of future energy supply. Perspective: Animal habitats are threatened by the turbines used in wind power. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	undermine	Statement: Claim: Wind power should be a primary focus of future energy supply. Perspective: Animal habitats are threatened by the turbines used in wind power. Constraint: For this evaluation, consider only land-based turbines and focus on immediate ecological impacts (within the next 10 years) to vertebrate species li...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Adds specific constraints (time horizon, turbine type, species scope, and spatial radius) that the reasoner must track while evaluating the perspective, without altering the logical relation between the perspective and the claim.", "name": "Constraint sat...
Problem: Statement: Claim: We have to teach creationism in schools. Perspective: Freedom of speech should apply to teachers as much as anyone else. Task: Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, classify it as supporting. ...	support	Problem: Statement: Claim: We have to teach creationism in schools. Perspective: Freedom of speech should apply to teachers as much as anyone else. Constraint: For this evaluation, treat "teachers" as including substitute teachers and guest lecturers; evaluate only whether the perspective could plausibly persuade a rea...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Add an extra constraint that the solver must track (who counts as 'teachers' and what contextual considerations to ignore), increasing cognitive load without changing the logical relation between perspective and claim.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" ...
Problem: Statement: Claim: All Americans should have the right (be entitled) to health care. Perspective: Health care for all might cost more in taxes. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine Solution: undermine	undermine	Problem: Statement: Claim: All Americans should have the right (be entitled) to health care. Perspective: Health care for all might cost more in taxes. Additional constraints for evaluation: For the purpose of answering this question, judge the relationship assuming only short-term (within one fiscal year) federal tax ...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added short-term funding constraints that the solver must track (only one-year federal tax increases, no offsets or long-term savings considered). These constraints increase bookkeeping but do not change the core relation between the perspective and the claim."...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18. Perspective: Society should make it easier for all young people to receive an education. Return exactly one word: support or undermine	support	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Raise The School Leaving Age To 18. Perspective: Society should make it easier for all young people to receive an education. Constraint: For this task, treat "make it easier" as referring only to ...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added additional constraints the solver must track (interpretation of 'make it easier' as non-coercive measures and instructions to ignore feasibility, exemptions, and enforcement) that do not change the alignment between perspective and claim.", "name": ...
Problem: Statement: Claim: It is time to stop buying bottled water. Perspective: Bottled water is important for travelers to avoid illnesss. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	undermine	Problem: Statement: Claim: It is time to stop buying bottled water. Perspective: Bottled water is important for travelers to avoid illnesss. Constraint: For this evaluation, you must base your judgment solely on the words in the "Perspective" sentence and may consider only factors explicitly mentioned there (health, sa...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Adds explicit constraints on what information and types of factors the evaluator may consider, forcing the model to track and apply these constraints during reasoning.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "mode...
Statement: Claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World. Perspective: Religion's Net Impact On The World Is A Positive One. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option. (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim	A	Statement: Claim: Religion In Itself Is A Purely Positive Force In The World. Perspective: Religion's Net Impact On The World Is A Positive One. Constraint: For the purposes of this question, treat the phrase "purely positive" as equivalent to "net positive" (i.e., referring to overall aggregate outcomes even if some n...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added definitional and scope constraints that the solver must track when mapping the perspective to the claim, without changing the logical relationship between them.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "moder...
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned. Perspective: Testing is needed for really new drugs. Choose the best option: (A) The perspective supports the claim (B) The perspective undermines the claim (C) The perspective is neutral or...	B	Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Performing tests on animals must be banned. Perspective: Testing is needed for really new drugs. For the purposes of this evaluation, assume the following constraints: (1) 'animals' refers to non-human vertebrates unless otherwise spe...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added multiple explicit constraints clarifying the meanings of key terms ('animals', 'testing', 'really new drugs', and 'needed') so the solver must track these definitions while evaluating support/undermining relations.", "name": "Constraint satisfaction...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Fast Food Advertising Should Be Banned. Perspective: Marketing aimed at children should be subject to strict regulations. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer must be exactly one of the words: support or undermine	support	Problem: Statement: Claim: Fast Food Advertising Should Be Banned. Perspective: Marketing aimed at children should be subject to strict regulations (For this decision, treat "children" as ages 0–12; treat "marketing" to include TV ads, online ads, in-app ads, branded toys, packaging, and in-store promotions but exclude...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added explicit definitions and constraints (age range, what counts as marketing, exclusions, and a tie-break rule for how to interpret 'strict regulations') that the solver must track while deciding support vs. undermine.", "name": "Constraint satisfactio...
Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: "Religious freedom abroad should be one of the primary foreign policy concerns for any country." Perspective: "Religion does not motivate foreign policy." Choose the best option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the clai...	B	Problem: Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: "Religious freedom abroad should be one of the primary foreign policy concerns for any country." Perspective: "Religion does not motivate foreign policy." Additional constraints for this classification task: interpret "religi...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Added extra interpretive constraints that the solver must hold while classifying (narrow definition of 'religion', scope limited to foreign policy, and instruction to judge only logical relation). These are additional conditions to track but do not change the c...