Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
PMID
int64
2.09k
36.2M
Title
stringlengths
21
414
Abstract
stringlengths
175
8.83k
Hypothesis
stringclasses
14 values
Entailment
float64
0
1
Positive
bool
2 classes
Label_idx
int64
1
7
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study has a cohort study or clinical trial
1
true
3
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial
0
false
3
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group
0
true
7
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study does not have any comparison patient group
1
false
7
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study has human subjects
1
true
1
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study does not have human subjects
0
false
1
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study contains population size or sample size information
1
true
6
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study does not contain population size information
0
false
6
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios
1
true
4
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study does not have any quantitative outcomes
0
false
4
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study has a target drug
1
true
5
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study does not have a target drug
0
false
5
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study has a target disease
1
true
2
11,777,291
Comparison of therapy with simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.
High-dose preparations of simvastatin and atorvastatin have recently become available to treat resistant hypercholesterolaemia aggressively, but few studies have compared these two agents. This study compared the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg and 120 mg in 22 patients with severe familial hypercholesterolaemia over a t...
This study does not have a target disease
0
false
2
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study has a cohort study or clinical trial
1
true
3
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial
0
false
3
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group
1
true
7
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study does not have any comparison patient group
0
false
7
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study has human subjects
1
true
1
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study does not have human subjects
0
false
1
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study contains population size or sample size information
1
true
6
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study does not contain population size information
0
false
6
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios
0
true
4
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study does not have any quantitative outcomes
1
false
4
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study has a target drug
1
true
5
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study does not have a target drug
0
false
5
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study has a target disease
1
true
2
1,320,241
A comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice.
to compare lisinopril and nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension in 52 patients in general practice with respect to the obtaining of target diastolic blood pressure and freedom from side effects. an open label, parallel randomised trial over an eight week period. lisinopril and nifedipine were found to ...
This study does not have a target disease
0
false
2
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study has a cohort study or clinical trial
1
true
3
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial
0
false
3
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group
0
true
7
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study does not have any comparison patient group
1
false
7
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study has human subjects
1
true
1
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study does not have human subjects
0
false
1
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study contains population size or sample size information
1
true
6
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study does not contain population size information
0
false
6
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios
1
true
4
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study does not have any quantitative outcomes
0
false
4
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study has a target drug
1
true
5
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study does not have a target drug
0
false
5
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study has a target disease
1
true
2
9,216,092
Five day and ten day triple therapy (amoxicillin, furazolidone and metronidazole) in the treatment of duodenal ulcer.
This investigation aimed to compare bacterial eradication and healing in patients with active duodenal ulcer treated with a combination of furazolidone 600 mg/day and metronidazole 750 mg/day and amoxicillin 1.5 and g/day for 5 (TT5) or 10 (TT10) days. Fifty four (TT5 = 28 and TT10 = 26) patients were included in the s...
This study does not have a target disease
0
false
2
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study has a cohort study or clinical trial
1
true
3
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial
0
false
3
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group
1
true
7
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study does not have any comparison patient group
0
false
7
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study has human subjects
1
true
1
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study does not have human subjects
0
false
1
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study contains population size or sample size information
1
true
6
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study does not contain population size information
0
false
6
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios
1
true
4
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study does not have any quantitative outcomes
0
false
4
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study has a target drug
1
true
5
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study does not have a target drug
0
false
5
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study has a target disease
0
true
2
30,553,135
Intentional early delivery versus expectant management for preterm premature rupture of membranes at 28-32 weeks' gestation: A multicentre randomized controlled trial (MICADO STUDY).
Preterm premature rupture of fetal membranes (PPROM) exposes the fetus to preterm birth, and optimal timing for delivery is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare intentional early delivery ("active management") with expectant management in very preterm birth (28-32 weeks). We conducted a prospective rando...
This study does not have a target disease
1
false
2
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study has a cohort study or clinical trial
1
true
3
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial
0
false
3
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group
1
true
7
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study does not have any comparison patient group
0
false
7
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study has human subjects
1
true
1
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study does not have human subjects
0
false
1
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study contains population size or sample size information
1
true
6
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study does not contain population size information
0
false
6
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios
1
true
4
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study does not have any quantitative outcomes
0
false
4
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study has a target drug
1
true
5
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study does not have a target drug
0
false
5
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study has a target disease
1
true
2
33,849,926
Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper b...
This study does not have a target disease
0
false
2
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study has a cohort study or clinical trial
1
true
3
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial
0
false
3
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group
0
true
7
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study does not have any comparison patient group
1
false
7
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study has human subjects
1
true
1
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study does not have human subjects
0
false
1
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study contains population size or sample size information
1
true
6
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study does not contain population size information
0
false
6
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios
0
true
4
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study does not have any quantitative outcomes
1
false
4
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study has a target drug
1
true
5
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study does not have a target drug
0
false
5
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study has a target disease
1
true
2
2,691,483
Prophylaxis in gynaecological surgery: a prospective randomized comparison between single dose prophylaxis with amoxycillin/clavulanate and the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole.
A prospective randomized comparison of a single pre-operative dose of 2.2 g amoxycillin/clavulanate versus the combination of 1.5 g cefuroxime plus 0.5 g metronidazole was conducted in 467 women, who underwent gynaecological surgery. The incidence of febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, wound infection and the u...
This study does not have a target disease
0
false
2
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study has a cohort study or clinical trial
1
true
3
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial
0
false
3
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study has a control, double-blind, or comparison patient group
1
true
7
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study does not have any comparison patient group
0
false
7
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study has human subjects
1
true
1
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study does not have human subjects
0
false
1
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study contains population size or sample size information
1
true
6
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study does not contain population size information
0
false
6
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study has quantitative outcomes like numbers, P-value, OR, CI, HR, RR, or patient ratios
1
true
4
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study does not have any quantitative outcomes
0
false
4
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study has a target drug
1
true
5
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study does not have a target drug
0
false
5
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study has a target disease
1
true
2
11,348,933
A placebo-controlled clinical trial of regular monotherapy with short-acting and long-acting beta(2)-agonists in allergic asthmatic patients.
Some recent studies suggest that regular beta(2)-agonist use may result in inadequate control of asthma. It has been hypothesized that this occurs particularly in allergic asthmatic patients exposed to relevant allergens. Moreover, it is still unclear whether this occurs during the use of both short-acting and long-act...
This study does not have a target disease
0
false
2
26,200,040
Efficacy of the Natural Clay, Calcium Aluminosilicate Anti-Diarrheal, in Reducing Medullary Thyroid Cancer-Related Diarrhea and Its Effects on Quality of Life: A Pilot Study.
Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC)-related diarrhea can be debilitating, reduces quality of life (QOL), and may be the only indication for initiating systemic therapy. Conventional antidiarrheal drugs are not always helpful and may have side effects. Calcium aluminosilicate antidiarrheal (CASAD), a natural calcium montmorr...
This study has a cohort study or clinical trial
1
true
3
26,200,040
Efficacy of the Natural Clay, Calcium Aluminosilicate Anti-Diarrheal, in Reducing Medullary Thyroid Cancer-Related Diarrhea and Its Effects on Quality of Life: A Pilot Study.
Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC)-related diarrhea can be debilitating, reduces quality of life (QOL), and may be the only indication for initiating systemic therapy. Conventional antidiarrheal drugs are not always helpful and may have side effects. Calcium aluminosilicate antidiarrheal (CASAD), a natural calcium montmorr...
This study does not have any cohorts or clinical trial
0
false
3
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Dataset Card for "biosift-nli"

More Information needed

Downloads last month
6

Models trained or fine-tuned on AshtonIsNotHere/biosift-nli