BasitAliii/sdlc-scenario-based-qa-dataset · Datasets at Hugging Face

Phase stringclasses 6 values	Question stringclasses 45 values	Person stringclasses 6 values	Answer stringlengths 13 154
Requirements Analysis	Q1: How were the initial requirements for the LMS gathered? Was there any formal requirement-gathering process like interviews, surveys, or workshops?	Imtiaz Ahmed	Requirements were gathered by exploring open-source LMS platforms (e.g., Moodle) and consulting IT team members.
Requirements Analysis	Q1: How were the initial requirements for the LMS gathered? Was there any formal requirement-gathering process like interviews, surveys, or workshops?	Javid Hussain	Requirements were gathered through discussion-based sessions initiated by Dr. Irshad Hussain with a committee of faculty members, IT staff, and an intern.
Requirements Analysis	Q1: How were the initial requirements for the LMS gathered? Was there any formal requirement-gathering process like interviews, surveys, or workshops?	Tahawur Abbas	Requirements were collected via student interviews and admin meetings, with formal interviews and meetings conducted.
Requirements Analysis	Q1: How were the initial requirements for the LMS gathered? Was there any formal requirement-gathering process like interviews, surveys, or workshops?	Amjad	Requirements were gathered through comprehensive requirement analysis sessions, including interviews and regular meetings with stakeholders.
Requirements Analysis	Q1: How were the initial requirements for the LMS gathered? Was there any formal requirement-gathering process like interviews, surveys, or workshops?	Asad Ali	Requirements were gathered through meetings; formal documentation was not prepared.
Requirements Analysis	Q1: How were the initial requirements for the LMS gathered? Was there any formal requirement-gathering process like interviews, surveys, or workshops?	Muhammad Askari	Requirements were gathered through informal stakeholder meetings rather than formal documentation processes.
Requirements Analysis	Q2: Were stakeholders such as faculty, students, or admin staff involved during the planning stage?	Imtiaz Ahmed	Yes, students (Amjad, Tahawar, Abida) and some faculty members were involved. Open-source solutions were also researched for timetable management.
Requirements Analysis	Q2: Were stakeholders such as faculty, students, or admin staff involved during the planning stage?	Javid Hussain	Yes, faculty members, IT faculty, and an intern were involved.
Requirements Analysis	Q2: Were stakeholders such as faculty, students, or admin staff involved during the planning stage?	Tahawur Abbas	Yes, students and admins were involved in planning.
Requirements Analysis	Q2: Were stakeholders such as faculty, students, or admin staff involved during the planning stage?	Amjad	Yes, feedback from faculty and students was continuously gathered and integrated.
Requirements Analysis	Q2: Were stakeholders such as faculty, students, or admin staff involved during the planning stage?	Asad Ali	Yes, faculty members and students' requirements were considered during planning.
Requirements Analysis	Q2: Were stakeholders such as faculty, students, or admin staff involved during the planning stage?	Muhammad Askari	Yes, faculty and IT staff were involved throughout the planning stage.
Requirements Analysis	Q3: Were there any documented functional and non-functional requirements? Can we see them?	Imtiaz Ahmed	No - formal requirement documents are not available. Documentation will be prepared for new features as the system migrates to an API-based CMS.
Requirements Analysis	Q3: Were there any documented functional and non-functional requirements? Can we see them?	Javid Hussain	No formal documentation exists; requirements were captured through discussions.
Requirements Analysis	Q3: Were there any documented functional and non-functional requirements? Can we see them?	Tahawur Abbas	Limited documentation exists; requirements were primarily captured verbally and via meeting notes.
Requirements Analysis	Q3: Were there any documented functional and non-functional requirements? Can we see them?	Amjad	Thorough documentation was maintained throughout the project's lifecycle.
Requirements Analysis	Q3: Were there any documented functional and non-functional requirements? Can we see them?	Asad Ali	No, there is no formal documentation.
Requirements Analysis	Q3: Were there any documented functional and non-functional requirements? Can we see them?	Muhammad Askari	No comprehensive SRS document was created; requirements were tracked informally.
Requirements Analysis	Q4: What challenges were faced during requirement collection?	Imtiaz Ahmed	Multiple challenges were encountered during requirement collection.
Requirements Analysis	Q4: What challenges were faced during requirement collection?	Javid Hussain	Many users had limited computer experience; training sessions were conducted to mitigate this.
Requirements Analysis	Q4: What challenges were faced during requirement collection?	Tahawur Abbas	Lack of clarity in requirements, departmental needs not fully captured, and limited time for planning were key challenges.
Requirements Analysis	Q4: What challenges were faced during requirement collection?	Amjad	Absence of a formal team leader and limited development time posed challenges.
Requirements Analysis	Q4: What challenges were faced during requirement collection?	Asad Ali	Various challenges were faced that required logical handling during requirement collection.
Requirements Analysis	Q4: What challenges were faced during requirement collection?	Muhammad Askari	Challenges arose in tracking requirements and managing scope due to lack of formal documentation.
Requirements Analysis	Q5: How were conflicting requirements between departments handled during planning?	Imtiaz Ahmed	Reconciliation issues (especially with accounts) were addressed using API-based solutions.
Requirements Analysis	Q5: How were conflicting requirements between departments handled during planning?	Javid Hussain	Conflicting requirements were managed through informal discussions with faculty and IT staff.
Requirements Analysis	Q5: How were conflicting requirements between departments handled during planning?	Tahawur Abbas	Conflicting requirements were resolved through discussions between students, admins, and IT team.
Requirements Analysis	Q5: How were conflicting requirements between departments handled during planning?	Amjad	Conflicts were handled by prioritizing critical features and implementing iterative improvements.
Requirements Analysis	Q5: How were conflicting requirements between departments handled during planning?	Asad Ali	Conflicts were discussed informally and resolved logically during planning.
Requirements Analysis	Q5: How were conflicting requirements between departments handled during planning?	Muhammad Askari	Conflicts were difficult to resolve due to absence of a comprehensive SRS document.
Requirements Analysis	Q6: Were any industry standards or educational guidelines considered during requirement definition?	Imtiaz Ahmed	Yes - industry practices such as object-oriented principles and a concurrent/agile approach were followed.
Requirements Analysis	Q6: Were any industry standards or educational guidelines considered during requirement definition?	Javid Hussain	Some standard practices like structured PHP and modular development were considered.
Requirements Analysis	Q6: Were any industry standards or educational guidelines considered during requirement definition?	Tahawur Abbas	Basic coding and design guidelines were applied in line with academic standards.
Requirements Analysis	Q6: Were any industry standards or educational guidelines considered during requirement definition?	Amjad	Some industry practices and coding standards were informally applied.
Requirements Analysis	Q6: Were any industry standards or educational guidelines considered during requirement definition?	Asad Ali	No specific guidelines were followed; it was an in-house approach.
Requirements Analysis	Q6: Were any industry standards or educational guidelines considered during requirement definition?	Muhammad Askari	Industry standards were considered informally during development.
Requirements Analysis	Q7: Is there a process in place for updating requirements when user needs evolve?	Imtiaz Ahmed	No formal process is documented; updates are handled informally.
Requirements Analysis	Q7: Is there a process in place for updating requirements when user needs evolve?	Javid Hussain	New students were included as interns in subsequent iterations to assist in further development.
Requirements Analysis	Q7: Is there a process in place for updating requirements when user needs evolve?	Tahawur Abbas	Updates were applied when user requirements changed or issues arose.
Requirements Analysis	Q7: Is there a process in place for updating requirements when user needs evolve?	Amjad	Regular updates and version control were used to accommodate evolving requirements.
Requirements Analysis	Q7: Is there a process in place for updating requirements when user needs evolve?	Asad Ali	Requirements are dynamic and evolve based on changing needs.
Requirements Analysis	Q7: Is there a process in place for updating requirements when user needs evolve?	Muhammad Askari	Handled informally through stakeholder meetings and incremental development.
Design & Architecture	Q1: Was any formal software design used (e.g., UML diagrams, ER diagrams)?	Imtiaz Ahmed	There was no formal design initially because Dr. Irshad Hussain, being an expert, directly guided the system design.
Design & Architecture	Q1: Was any formal software design used (e.g., UML diagrams, ER diagrams)?	Javid Hussain	No formal design tools; Joomla and structured PHP were used.
Design & Architecture	Q1: Was any formal software design used (e.g., UML diagrams, ER diagrams)?	Tahawur Abbas	Yes, an ER diagram was created for database structure.
Design & Architecture	Q1: Was any formal software design used (e.g., UML diagrams, ER diagrams)?	Amjad	Yes, an ER diagram was developed.
Design & Architecture	Q1: Was any formal software design used (e.g., UML diagrams, ER diagrams)?	Asad Ali	Basic system design was used, but no formal diagrams were created.
Design & Architecture	Q1: Was any formal software design used (e.g., UML diagrams, ER diagrams)?	Muhammad Askari	ER diagrams were used for database design. No UML diagrams were created.
Design & Architecture	Q2: Were design alternatives evaluated before implementation?	Imtiaz Ahmed	No - design alternatives were not formally documented.
Design & Architecture	Q2: Were design alternatives evaluated before implementation?	Javid Hussain	Yes, design alternatives were considered informally based on feasibility and system requirements.
Design & Architecture	Q2: Were design alternatives evaluated before implementation?	Tahawur Abbas	Yes, the design was evaluated.
Design & Architecture	Q2: Were design alternatives evaluated before implementation?	Amjad	Yes, discussions were held to address system limitations and the choice of PHP.
Design & Architecture	Q2: Were design alternatives evaluated before implementation?	Asad Ali	Yes, design alternatives were informally discussed among team members.
Design & Architecture	Q2: Were design alternatives evaluated before implementation?	Muhammad Askari	Yes, design alternatives were evaluated with stakeholder approval.
Design & Architecture	Q3: Was the design reviewed or approved by stakeholders?	Imtiaz Ahmed	Yes, Dr. Irshad Hussain reviewed the design.
Design & Architecture	Q3: Was the design reviewed or approved by stakeholders?	Javid Hussain	Yes, Dr. Irshad Hussain supervised development and reviewed code.
Design & Architecture	Q3: Was the design reviewed or approved by stakeholders?	Tahawur Abbas	The design was reviewed internally but not formally approved by external stakeholders.
Design & Architecture	Q3: Was the design reviewed or approved by stakeholders?	Amjad	Yes, the design was reviewed and approved by key stakeholders.
Design & Architecture	Q3: Was the design reviewed or approved by stakeholders?	Asad Ali	Yes, stakeholders were consulted informally.
Design & Architecture	Q3: Was the design reviewed or approved by stakeholders?	Muhammad Askari	Yes, stakeholders approved design alternatives.
Design & Architecture	Q4: What architecture pattern is the LMS based on? (Monolithic, Microservices, Layered, etc.)	Imtiaz Ahmed	The system uses a layered approach typical for Joomla-based applications.
Design & Architecture	Q4: What architecture pattern is the LMS based on? (Monolithic, Microservices, Layered, etc.)	Javid Hussain	A structured, layered approach.
Design & Architecture	Q4: What architecture pattern is the LMS based on? (Monolithic, Microservices, Layered, etc.)	Tahawur Abbas	Layered architecture was applied within the limitations of Joomla.
Design & Architecture	Q4: What architecture pattern is the LMS based on? (Monolithic, Microservices, Layered, etc.)	Amjad	Layered/monolithic approach was used; modular separation maintained.
Design & Architecture	Q4: What architecture pattern is the LMS based on? (Monolithic, Microservices, Layered, etc.)	Asad Ali	Layered architecture was informally applied.
Design & Architecture	Q4: What architecture pattern is the LMS based on? (Monolithic, Microservices, Layered, etc.)	Muhammad Askari	The system follows a microservices architecture.
Design & Architecture	Q5: How do you manage scalability and modularity in the system?	Imtiaz Ahmed	Through Joomla features, scalability and modularity are managed.
Design & Architecture	Q5: How do you manage scalability and modularity in the system?	Javid Hussain	Scalability and modularity are managed within the structured layered system.
Design & Architecture	Q5: How do you manage scalability and modularity in the system?	Tahawur Abbas	Scalability and modularity were difficult to manage.
Design & Architecture	Q5: How do you manage scalability and modularity in the system?	Amjad	Modular separation was maintained for clarity and maintainability; plans to shift from Joomla to Laravel to improve scalability.
Design & Architecture	Q5: How do you manage scalability and modularity in the system?	Asad Ali	Basic modularity is maintained; scalability is planned for future upgrades.
Design & Architecture	Q5: How do you manage scalability and modularity in the system?	Muhammad Askari	Scalability and modularity were achieved through microservices architecture.
Design & Architecture	Q6: Do you have any plans to make the website more secure, such as by adding features like an SSL certificate?	Imtiaz Ahmed	Yes - an SSL certificate is already in place for the website but not for LMS.
Design & Architecture	Q6: Do you have any plans to make the website more secure, such as by adding features like an SSL certificate?	Javid Hussain	Security measures like query sanitization and XSS protection were implemented early; SSL implementation is planned.
Design & Architecture	Q6: Do you have any plans to make the website more secure, such as by adding features like an SSL certificate?	Tahawur Abbas	Yes, security measures like SSL certificates were considered.
Design & Architecture	Q6: Do you have any plans to make the website more secure, such as by adding features like an SSL certificate?	Amjad	Yes, SSL certificate implementation was planned (already purchased).
Design & Architecture	Q6: Do you have any plans to make the website more secure, such as by adding features like an SSL certificate?	Asad Ali	For website security, SSL and VHE are applied; LMS security is planned.
Design & Architecture	Q6: Do you have any plans to make the website more secure, such as by adding features like an SSL certificate?	Muhammad Askari	SSL and security improvements are planned for LMS.
Design & Architecture	Q7: Was the database schema designed for flexibility and future growth?	Imtiaz Ahmed	The database schema allows basic growth; ER diagrams guided design.
Design & Architecture	Q7: Was the database schema designed for flexibility and future growth?	Javid Hussain	The database was structured for current requirements, but flexibility was limited.
Design & Architecture	Q7: Was the database schema designed for flexibility and future growth?	Tahawur Abbas	ER diagram-based schema allows for some future growth.
Design & Architecture	Q7: Was the database schema designed for flexibility and future growth?	Amjad	The database design is modular and adaptable for future enhancements.
Design & Architecture	Q7: Was the database schema designed for flexibility and future growth?	Asad Ali	Database designed for current needs with some modularity for future updates.
Design & Architecture	Q7: Was the database schema designed for flexibility and future growth?	Muhammad Askari	Yes, ER diagrams were used for database schema design.
Design & Architecture	Q8: Are there separate layers for business logic, data access, and presentation in the system?	Imtiaz Ahmed	Yes, Joomla's built-in structure provides basic separation of concerns.
Design & Architecture	Q8: Are there separate layers for business logic, data access, and presentation in the system?	Javid Hussain	Yes, structured layered approach.
Design & Architecture	Q8: Are there separate layers for business logic, data access, and presentation in the system?	Tahawur Abbas	Basic separation is followed between database access and application logic.
Design & Architecture	Q8: Are there separate layers for business logic, data access, and presentation in the system?	Amjad	Yes, modular separation was maintained.
Design & Architecture	Q8: Are there separate layers for business logic, data access, and presentation in the system?	Asad Ali	Layers exist informally within the Joomla structure.
Design & Architecture	Q8: Are there separate layers for business logic, data access, and presentation in the system?	Muhammad Askari	Yes, business logic, data access, and presentation layers are separated using microservices principles.
Design & Architecture	Q9: Is the system designed to support integration with third-party platforms (e.g., payment gateways, learning tools)?	Imtiaz Ahmed	Currently, no third-party platform support is implemented.
Design & Architecture	Q9: Is the system designed to support integration with third-party platforms (e.g., payment gateways, learning tools)?	Javid Hussain	No, system follows a structured approach without third-party plugins.
Design & Architecture	Q9: Is the system designed to support integration with third-party platforms (e.g., payment gateways, learning tools)?	Tahawur Abbas	System designed for potential integration but not implemented yet.
Design & Architecture	Q9: Is the system designed to support integration with third-party platforms (e.g., payment gateways, learning tools)?	Amjad	Third-party integrations are possible with additional development.
Design & Architecture	Q9: Is the system designed to support integration with third-party platforms (e.g., payment gateways, learning tools)?	Asad Ali	Planned for future LMS updates; not currently implemented.
Design & Architecture	Q9: Is the system designed to support integration with third-party platforms (e.g., payment gateways, learning tools)?	Muhammad Askari	Integration support is considered but not yet implemented.
Development Process	Q1: What programming languages or frameworks were used at the beginning of the development process?	Imtiaz Ahmed	Joomla was used initially.
Development Process	Q1: What programming languages or frameworks were used at the beginning of the development process?	Javid Hussain	Backend: PHP (structured); Database: SQL.
Development Process	Q1: What programming languages or frameworks were used at the beginning of the development process?	Tahawur Abbas	Core PHP and Joomla were used for backend.
Development Process	Q1: What programming languages or frameworks were used at the beginning of the development process?	Amjad	PHP and Joomla.

Requirements Analysis

Q1: How were the initial requirements for the LMS gathered? Was there any formal requirement-gathering process like interviews, surveys, or workshops?

Imtiaz Ahmed

Requirements were gathered by exploring open-source LMS platforms (e.g., Moodle) and consulting IT team members.

Requirements Analysis

Q1: How were the initial requirements for the LMS gathered? Was there any formal requirement-gathering process like interviews, surveys, or workshops?

Javid Hussain

Requirements were gathered through discussion-based sessions initiated by Dr. Irshad Hussain with a committee of faculty members, IT staff, and an intern.

Requirements Analysis

Q1: How were the initial requirements for the LMS gathered? Was there any formal requirement-gathering process like interviews, surveys, or workshops?

Tahawur Abbas

Requirements were collected via student interviews and admin meetings, with formal interviews and meetings conducted.

Requirements Analysis

Q1: How were the initial requirements for the LMS gathered? Was there any formal requirement-gathering process like interviews, surveys, or workshops?

Amjad

Requirements were gathered through comprehensive requirement analysis sessions, including interviews and regular meetings with stakeholders.

Requirements Analysis

Q1: How were the initial requirements for the LMS gathered? Was there any formal requirement-gathering process like interviews, surveys, or workshops?

Asad Ali

Requirements were gathered through meetings; formal documentation was not prepared.

Requirements Analysis

Q1: How were the initial requirements for the LMS gathered? Was there any formal requirement-gathering process like interviews, surveys, or workshops?

Muhammad Askari

Requirements were gathered through informal stakeholder meetings rather than formal documentation processes.

Requirements Analysis

Q2: Were stakeholders such as faculty, students, or admin staff involved during the planning stage?

Imtiaz Ahmed

Yes, students (Amjad, Tahawar, Abida) and some faculty members were involved. Open-source solutions were also researched for timetable management.

Requirements Analysis

Q2: Were stakeholders such as faculty, students, or admin staff involved during the planning stage?

Javid Hussain

Yes, faculty members, IT faculty, and an intern were involved.

Requirements Analysis

Q2: Were stakeholders such as faculty, students, or admin staff involved during the planning stage?

Tahawur Abbas

Yes, students and admins were involved in planning.

Requirements Analysis

Q2: Were stakeholders such as faculty, students, or admin staff involved during the planning stage?

Amjad

Yes, feedback from faculty and students was continuously gathered and integrated.

Requirements Analysis

Q2: Were stakeholders such as faculty, students, or admin staff involved during the planning stage?

Asad Ali

Yes, faculty members and students' requirements were considered during planning.

Requirements Analysis

Q2: Were stakeholders such as faculty, students, or admin staff involved during the planning stage?

Muhammad Askari

Yes, faculty and IT staff were involved throughout the planning stage.

Requirements Analysis