text stringlengths 12 440 | cluster stringclasses 3 values |
|---|---|
This summary could flow a little better and not be broken up into so many little sentences. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Use complete sentences, not a string of fragments. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be written better so it flows nicely. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Neighbor was feeding it. Also "what do" makes no sense. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary unnecessarily adds a second sentence in that basically just rephrases what the first sentence stated. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be written so it flows a little better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The grammar could be better in this summary. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is a run-on sentence and could have been written better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is all jumbled up and makes very little sense. e.g. "nice favored stepson"
| 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Remove "The text contains a situation in which".
The comment is eating him up and is he overthinking it | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is not very well written. It can be taken out of context easily. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is not coherent and makes very little sense. Confusing. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be written more fluently and in a complete sentence. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Second sentence isn't clear | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be reworded so it flows a little better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is not a good summary. It is all over the place and it does not really tie anything together. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary could be written so it flows a little better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary would have been perfect if it was well constructed in the right order if event happenings | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The switch from third person to first person between the two sentences is a bit confusing. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary does well at condensing the post, but it doesn’t flow naturally. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The first sentence in the summary should be reworded to make better sense. It reads like the other guy was cheating on his ex wife when really like it was the user’s ex wife. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is accurate, but I think it is oddly written | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary has repetitiveness and poor grammar so it should be rewritten to flow better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is not written in the same style as the post. The summary is in third person. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary is pretty concise about the topic, but I would word it in a better way to make it flow more naturally. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary is made up of choppy sentence fragments. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is somewhat incoherent; the poster shared a story about how when they were little, they got bit by a dog and lied about it. They are asking other people what lies they have told their parents when they were young that their parents still believe to be true. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary covers the main ideas in the post but could be written more fluently. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary should just add the word “and” where the comma is so it flows better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is very incoherent and mixes up the poster and the guy they punched. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This description isn't coherent. It ends in the middle of a sentence, and gives no context as to what's really going on. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is somewhat incoherent; the poster wants to do something nice for their girlfriend on her birthday. She will be working on her birthday, so they have no idea what they can do and are asking for advice. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The way this summary is written doesn’t flow that well, but it does capture the purpose of the post. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The wording could be improved | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The second person sentence feels odd in the context of a summary of the post. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
There's room to use complete sentecnes. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is written in a confusing way with a lot of ideas crammed together in one sentence. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary should use less commas and be broken up into two sentences so it flows a little better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The sentence is kind of run on with the the part after the comma not making much sense. Should be a spar ate sentence with more clarity. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is extremely confusing and it doesn't tell a story on its own. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be phrased a bit better but that’s minor and doesn’t affect the understanding of it. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is hard to read and follow, it needs to be restructured and also include that she broke up with the guy. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is not very coherent; the poster is buying a new smartphone and is asking Reddit what they objectively think is the best smartphone on the market currently. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Other than being a little clunky syntactically, it captures the author's sentiment well. However, I would mention that the author's discomfort stem from his worry as to why his fiancee is still talking to her ex. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Remove "The text is a question from" | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Grammatically this summary could be a bit better about using capital letters. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary sums up the situation well but the flow could use some work. The use of partner is repetitive. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is not written correctly. "Doesn't affect" should be "affects". | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be rewritten to flow better instead of commas separating main points. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary covers the details pretty well but it’s written in an unnatural way. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The sentence "Can you help?" feels odd and rather out of place in the context of a summary. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could grammatically flow better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary could be rewritten in a way that make it easier to understand the situation. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The last sentence is unclear and hard to follow. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary is written in a way that’s not easy to read. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The beginning of the summary is phrased in a very confusing way. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is confusing the way that it was written, especially the first sentence. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
It needs more detail, better sentence structure and some things can be left out. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The last two sentences seem weird since they seem redundant. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is an incomplete sentence, so cannot stand alone | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary is not well composed | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Thisn't isn't super coherent. Without the full context, saying 'boiling chick peas creates gas' doesn't make sense. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Husband has given veto power is a confusing statement. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is a bit disjointed at the end. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is a very long, run-on sentence. This could have been written much better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is a good summary that mentions all the key points, but "What do" is not a valid sentence. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary covers the main points but should be written in better grammatical form to make it easy to read. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is written in the third person, while the original text is in the first person. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is too disjointed. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Uses sentence fragments to fit everything in. Cover just the main points, but with complete sentences | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The main ideas are in the summary but it is broken up weirdly and doesn’t read properly. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is kind of disjointed. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be written more fluently. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The second sentence in the summary should be broken up into two separate sentences and the two ideas there do not make much sense when paired together. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is not grammatically correct and it could have been written without the profanity. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This focuses on the wrong details ang gets things in the wrong order. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary doesn't make it clear who he/his being referred to is. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The first sentence in the summary could be phrased a bit better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary should be written to be more fluent and not so broken up by too many sentences. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary does pretty well at getting the details of the post but the way it’s written doesn’t sound naturally. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be rewritten so it flows a little better and is easier to comprehend. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary could be written in a proper sentence to make it flow better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The first sentence does not match the style of the passage. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary should be split into two sentences so that it reads easier. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
It's cut off | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
"The text discusses" is a clunky beginning. Not so much too much time with the friends as not enough time with him. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is not very coherent. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary contains most of the important information from the passage but is hard to follow. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This is not written well since it implies the girlfriend flipped out. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The wording in the summary’s sentence is confusing. It should be split up into a couple of sentences so it’s easier to understand. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This could be more clearly written. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary could be rewritten in better sentence format so it flows a little better. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
This summary could flow a little better. The comma is misplaced and should have been a period. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The end part of this summary could be rephrased to just say that the relationship seems one-sided because she doesn’t reciprocate favors. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The first part of the summary seems like its written in third person, while the second is in first. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The sentence structure in the summary feels too simplistic. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The use of "it" grammatically references the last instance, ex., etc. given. This makes the summary misleading as both instances are actually April Fools jokes. With the former a retaliation for the latter. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Doesn't read right-I found out my significant other slept with a friend of his before he met me. I've met her and always had a feeling she didn't like me. This is getting to me. (this sounds better) | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The first sentence in the summary is a bit confusing so it could be rewritten for better understanding. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
The summary is a bit disjointed and incoherent by itself. | 3) Structure, Coherence or Grammatical Errors |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.