promptID
int32
0
146k
pairID
stringlengths
2
7
premise
stringlengths
5
1.82k
premise_binary_parse
stringlengths
6
3.43k
premise_parse
stringlengths
23
6.45k
hypothesis
stringlengths
1
393
hypothesis_binary_parse
stringlengths
1
669
hypothesis_parse
stringlengths
19
1.15k
genre
stringclasses
5 values
label
class label
3 classes
input
stringlengths
32
1.92k
67,374
67374n
yeah you shouldn't even worry about most of the stuff i mean i don't know it's a little near sighted but uh
( yeah ( you ( ( ( should n't ) even ) ( worry ( about ( most ( of ( ( the ( ( ( stuff i ) mean ) i ) ) ( ( do n't ) ( know ( it ( 's ( a ( little ( near ( ( sighted but ) uh ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD should) (RB n't) (ADVP (RB even)) (VP (VB worry) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (JJS most)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN stuff) (FW i) (FW mean) (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (DT a) (RB little) (RB near) ...
I know this is near sighted of me but I don't like to think far into the future.
( ( ( ( I ( know ( this ( is ( near ( sighted ( of me ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( I ( ( do n't ) ( like ( to ( think ( far ( into ( the future ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (DT this)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB near) (JJ sighted) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP me))))))))) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB like) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB think) (ADVP (RB far) (PP (IN into) (NP (DT the) (NN future)))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: yeah you shouldn't even worry about most of the stuff i mean i don't know it's a little near sighted but uh Hypothesis: I know this is near sighted of me but I don't like to think far into the future.
82,089
82089c
For every 200 successful [alternative exam] takers, the courts would have 30,000 pro bono hours of service, to be utilized as the courts found most compelling.
( ( For ( every ( 200 ( successful ( -LSB- ( alternative ( exam ( -RSB- takers ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the courts ) ( ( would ( have ( ( ( 30,000 ( ( pro ( bono hours ) ) ( of service ) ) ) , ) ( to ( be ( utilized ( as ( ( the courts ) ( found ( most compelling ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN For) (NP (DT every) (CD 200) (JJ successful) (NN -LSB-) (NN alternative) (NN exam) (JJ -RSB-) (NNS takers))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNS courts)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN 30,000) (NP (NP (FW pro) (FW bono) (NNS hours)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN service)))) (, ,) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN u...
The courts would get no pro bono hours of service, ever, at all.
( ( The courts ) ( ( would ( ( ( ( ( get ( ( no ( ( pro bono ) hours ) ) ( of service ) ) ) , ) ever ) , ) ( at all ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS courts)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB get) (NP (NP (DT no) (ADJP (FW pro) (FW bono)) (NNS hours)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN service)))) (, ,) (ADVP (RB ever)) (, ,) (ADVP (IN at) (DT all)))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: For every 200 successful [alternative exam] takers, the courts would have 30,000 pro bono hours of service, to be utilized as the courts found most compelling. Hypothesis: The courts would get no pro bono hours of service, ever, at all.
80,687
80687n
Visibility improvement would be anticipated over large areas including national parks and wilderness areas and recovery of many freshwater and coastal ecosystems would be likely.
( ( ( ( ( Visibility improvement ) ( would ( be ( anticipated ( over ( ( large areas ) ( including ( ( ( ( ( national parks ) and ) ( wilderness areas ) ) and ) ( recovery ( of ( many freshwater ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( ( coastal ecosystems ) ( would ( be likely ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (JJ Visibility) (NN improvement)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN anticipated) (PP (IN over) (NP (NP (JJ large) (NNS areas)) (PP (VBG including) (NP (NP (NP (JJ national) (NNS parks)) (CC and) (NP (NN wilderness) (NNS areas))) (CC and) (NP (NP (NN recovery)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ many) (NN freshwater)...
The National Parks have proposed a plan to draw tourists while simultaneously helping the environment.
( ( The ( National Parks ) ) ( ( have ( proposed ( a ( plan ( to ( ( draw tourists ) ( while ( simultaneously ( helping ( the environment ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP National) (NNP Parks)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN proposed) (NP (DT a) (NN plan) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB draw) (NP (NNS tourists)) (SBAR (IN while) (S (ADVP (RB simultaneously)) (VP (VBG helping) (NP (DT the) (NN environment))))))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
Premise: Visibility improvement would be anticipated over large areas including national parks and wilderness areas and recovery of many freshwater and coastal ecosystems would be likely. Hypothesis: The National Parks have proposed a plan to draw tourists while simultaneously helping the environment.
120,765
120765e
yeah what now what state are you in
( ( ( yeah what ) now ) ( what ( state ( ( are you ) in ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (NP (WP what)) (ADVP (RB now)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (NN state)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (PRP you)) (PP (IN in))))))))
What state are you in?
( ( What state ) ( ( ( are you ) in ) ? ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (WHNP (WDT What) (NN state)) (SQ (VBP are) (NP (PRP you)) (PP (IN in))) (. ?)))
telephone
0entailment
Premise: yeah what now what state are you in Hypothesis: What state are you in?
120,816
120816c
have you have you tried getting outside estimates to see what it costs to have something painted
( have ( you ( have ( you ( tried ( ( getting ( outside estimates ) ) ( to ( see ( what ( it ( costs ( to ( have ( something painted ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB have) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VB have) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD tried) (S (VP (VBG getting) (NP (JJ outside) (NNS estimates)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB see) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ costs) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (NN something)) (VP (VBN painted)))))))))))))))))))))
Are you just going to do it yourself?
( ( ( Are you ) ( just ( going ( to ( ( do it ) yourself ) ) ) ) ) ? )
(ROOT (SQ (VBP Are) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (ADVP (RB just)) (VBG going) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (NP (PRP it)) (NP (PRP yourself)))))) (. ?)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: have you have you tried getting outside estimates to see what it costs to have something painted Hypothesis: Are you just going to do it yourself?
36,285
36285n
We had a late luncheon and spent the afternoon resting in the garden.
( We ( ( ( ( had ( a ( late luncheon ) ) ) and ) ( ( spent ( the ( afternoon resting ) ) ) ( in ( the garden ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (VP (VBD had) (NP (DT a) (JJ late) (NN luncheon))) (CC and) (VP (VBD spent) (NP (DT the) (NN afternoon) (NN resting)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN garden))))) (. .)))
We enjoyed the late luncheon
( We ( enjoyed ( the ( late luncheon ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (VBD enjoyed) (NP (DT the) (JJ late) (NN luncheon)))))
fiction
1neutral
Premise: We had a late luncheon and spent the afternoon resting in the garden. Hypothesis: We enjoyed the late luncheon
95,092
95092e
I'm right, then.
( I ( ( ( ( 'm right ) , ) then ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 'm) (ADJP (JJ right)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB then))) (. .)))
I am correct then.
( I ( ( ( am correct ) then ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP am) (ADJP (JJ correct)) (ADVP (RB then))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: I'm right, then. Hypothesis: I am correct then.
21,279
21279e
so so was uh you know two miles a day to and from work so it kind of cut my transportation costs a lot but now i've just bought a new house and i'm a half hour
( ( so so ) ( ( ( was ( uh ( you ( know ( ( two miles ) ( a day ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( to and ) from ) work ) ) ( so ( it ( ( kind of ) ( cut ( ( my transportation ) ( costs ( ( a lot ) ( ( ( but ( now ( i ( ( 've just ) ( bought ( a ( new house ) ) ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( i ( 'm ( a ( half hour ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (ADVP (RB so) (RB so)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ uh) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (NP (NP (CD two) (NNS miles)) (NP (DT a) (NN day))))))) (PP (TO to) (CC and) (IN from) (NP (NN work)))) (SBAR (IN so) (S (NP (PRP it)) (ADVP (NN kind) (IN of)) (VP (VBD cut) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP$ my) (NN transportation)) ...
Now I live half an hour away, but I used to only be two miles from work.
( ( ( ( ( Now ( I ( ( live ( half ( an hour ) ) ) away ) ) ) , ) but ) ( I ( used ( ( to only ) ( be ( ( two miles ) ( from work ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (ADVP (RB Now)) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP live) (NP (QP (PDT half) (DT an) (NN hour))) (ADVP (RB away)))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD used) (S (VP (TO to) (ADVP (RB only)) (VP (VB be) (NP (NP (CD two) (NNS miles)) (PP (IN from) (NP (NN work))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
Premise: so so was uh you know two miles a day to and from work so it kind of cut my transportation costs a lot but now i've just bought a new house and i'm a half hour Hypothesis: Now I live half an hour away, but I used to only be two miles from work.
41,501
41501e
Further down the steps, you pass two places reserved for ritual ablutions required before Islamic prayer.
( ( Further ( down ( the steps ) ) ) ( , ( you ( ( pass ( ( two places ) ( reserved ( for ( ( ritual ablutions ) ( required ( before ( Islamic prayer ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (ADVP (RB Further)) (IN down) (NP (DT the) (NNS steps))) (, ,) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP pass) (NP (NP (CD two) (NNS places)) (VP (VBN reserved) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NN ritual) (NNS ablutions)) (VP (VBN required) (PP (IN before) (NP (JJ Islamic) (NN prayer))))))))) (. .)))
There are two places for ritual ablutions just further down.
( There ( ( ( are ( ( two places ) ( for ( ritual ablutions ) ) ) ) ( just ( further down ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (CD two) (NNS places)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN ritual) (NNS ablutions)))) (ADVP (RB just) (RBR further) (RB down))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
Premise: Further down the steps, you pass two places reserved for ritual ablutions required before Islamic prayer. Hypothesis: There are two places for ritual ablutions just further down.
59,858
59858e
yeah huh well that almighty dollar
( ( yeah huh ) ( well ( that ( almighty dollar ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB yeah) (NP (NN huh)) (PP (RB well) (NP (DT that) (JJ almighty) (NN dollar))))))
Well, that omnipotent dollar
( Well ( , ( that ( omnipotent dollar ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (INTJ (UH Well)) (, ,) (NP (DT that) (NN omnipotent) (NN dollar))))
telephone
0entailment
Premise: yeah huh well that almighty dollar Hypothesis: Well, that omnipotent dollar
67,611
67611e
Tuppence's conscience gave her a passing twinge as she remembered the archdeacon.
( ( ( Tuppence 's ) conscience ) ( ( ( gave her ) ( ( a ( passing twinge ) ) ( as ( she ( remembered ( the archdeacon ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Tuppence) (POS 's)) (NN conscience)) (VP (VBD gave) (NP (PRP her)) (NP (NP (DT a) (VBG passing) (NN twinge)) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBD remembered) (NP (DT the) (NN archdeacon))))))) (. .)))
Tuppence recalled the archdeacon.
( Tuppence ( ( recalled ( the archdeacon ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Tuppence)) (VP (VBD recalled) (NP (DT the) (NN archdeacon))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: Tuppence's conscience gave her a passing twinge as she remembered the archdeacon. Hypothesis: Tuppence recalled the archdeacon.
7,210
7210e
Network externalities are in.
( ( Network externalities ) ( ( are in ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Network) (NNS externalities)) (VP (VBP are) (PP (IN in))) (. .)))
Unseen benefits to the network are popular.
( ( ( Unseen benefits ) ( to ( the network ) ) ) ( ( are popular ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NN Unseen) (NNS benefits)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN network)))) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ popular))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
Premise: Network externalities are in. Hypothesis: Unseen benefits to the network are popular.
105,557
105557e
Among other things, the preambles included a title and reasons for the information collection, the proposed use for the information, a description of the respondents, and the frequency of responses.
( ( Among ( other things ) ) ( , ( ( the preambles ) ( ( included ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( a ( ( title and ) reasons ) ) ( for ( the ( information collection ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( the ( proposed use ) ) ( for ( the information ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( a description ) ( of ( the respondents ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( the frequency ) ( of response...
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Among) (NP (JJ other) (NNS things))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNS preambles)) (VP (VBD included) (NP (NP (NP (DT a) (NN title) (CC and) (NNS reasons)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (NN information) (NN collection)))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ proposed) (NN use)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (NN information)))) (,...
There are a title and reasons in the preambles.
( There ( ( are ( ( a ( ( title and ) reasons ) ) ( in ( the preambles ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN title) (CC and) (NNS reasons)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NNS preambles))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
Premise: Among other things, the preambles included a title and reasons for the information collection, the proposed use for the information, a description of the respondents, and the frequency of responses. Hypothesis: There are a title and reasons in the preambles.
91,005
91005c
uh-huh but she's the best the best of both breeds
( uh-huh ( but ( she ( 's ( the ( best ( ( the best ) ( of ( both breeds ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (VP (VB uh-huh) (SBAR (CC but) (S (NP (PRP she)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (DT the) (JJS best) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJS best)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT both) (NN breeds)))))))))))
She is the worst ever.
( She ( ( ( is ( the worst ) ) ever ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT the) (JJS worst)) (ADVP (RB ever))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: uh-huh but she's the best the best of both breeds Hypothesis: She is the worst ever.
131,557
131557c
HERITAGE ASSETS ANNUAL STEWARDSHIP INFORMATION
( HERITAGE ( ASSETS ( ANNUAL ( STEWARDSHIP INFORMATION ) ) ) )
(ROOT (NP (NNP HERITAGE) (NNP ASSETS) (NNP ANNUAL) (NNP STEWARDSHIP) (NNP INFORMATION)))
There is information about the Heritage liabilities.
( There ( ( is ( information ( about ( the ( Heritage liabilities ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (NN information)) (PP (IN about) (NP (DT the) (NNP Heritage) (NNS liabilities))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: HERITAGE ASSETS ANNUAL STEWARDSHIP INFORMATION Hypothesis: There is information about the Heritage liabilities.
65,047
65047c
An ambitious plan for a hexagonally based church, raised above the ground on stilts and with stained-glass windows by Pollock, came to nothing.
( ( ( ( ( ( An ( ambitious plan ) ) ( for ( a ( ( hexagonally based ) church ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( raised ( ( ( above ( ( the ground ) ( on stilts ) ) ) and ) ( with ( stained-glass windows ) ) ) ) ( by Pollock ) ) ) , ) ( ( came ( to nothing ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT An) (JJ ambitious) (NN plan)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (RB hexagonally) (VBN based)) (NN church))) (, ,) (VP (VBN raised) (PP (PP (IN above) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN ground)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NNS stilts))))) (CC and) (PP (IN with) (NP (NN stained-glass) (NNS windows)))) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNP Polloc...
The complex plan of the hospital, came to nothing.
( ( ( The ( complex plan ) ) ( of ( the hospital ) ) ) ( , ( ( came ( to nothing ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ complex) (NN plan)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN hospital)))) (, ,) (VP (VBD came) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN nothing)))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: An ambitious plan for a hexagonally based church, raised above the ground on stilts and with stained-glass windows by Pollock, came to nothing. Hypothesis: The complex plan of the hospital, came to nothing.
34,553
34553c
'What about?'
( ` ( What ( ( about ? ) ' ) ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (`` `) (WHNP (WP What)) (SQ (VP (VBZ about))) (. ?) ('' ')))
Not about anything.
( Not ( ( about anything ) . ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (RB Not) (PP (IN about) (NP (NN anything))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
Premise: 'What about?' Hypothesis: Not about anything.
46,414
46414e
So get psychologically prepared and don't be blind-sided by the venom.
( So ( ( ( ( get ( psychologically prepared ) ) and ) ( ( do n't ) ( be ( blind-sided ( by ( the venom ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (RB So) (VP (VP (VB get) (ADJP (RB psychologically) (JJ prepared))) (CC and) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB be) (VP (JJ blind-sided) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (NN venom))))))) (. .)))
Mentally prepare yourself against the venom.
( Mentally ( ( ( prepare yourself ) ( against ( the venom ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Mentally)) (VP (VB prepare) (NP (PRP yourself)) (PP (IN against) (NP (DT the) (NN venom)))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
Premise: So get psychologically prepared and don't be blind-sided by the venom. Hypothesis: Mentally prepare yourself against the venom.
44,601
44601e
It allows us to measure program performance in more sophisticated ways.
( It ( ( allows ( us ( to ( ( measure ( program performance ) ) ( in ( ( more sophisticated ) ways ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ allows) (S (NP (PRP us)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB measure) (NP (NN program) (NN performance)) (PP (IN in) (NP (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ sophisticated)) (NNS ways))))))) (. .)))
There are ways to measure program performance.
( There ( ( are ( ways ( to ( measure ( program performance ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NNS ways) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB measure) (NP (NN program) (NN performance))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
Premise: It allows us to measure program performance in more sophisticated ways. Hypothesis: There are ways to measure program performance.
53,845
53845c
'I'll go over your data, find out what you did wrong.
( ` ( ( I ( 'll ( ( go over ) ( your data ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( find out ) ( what ( you ( did wrong ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (`` `) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD 'll) (VP (VB go) (PRT (RP over)) (NP (PRP$ your) (NNS data))))) (, ,) (VP (VBP find) (PRT (RP out)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD did) (ADJP (JJ wrong)))))) (. .)))
I can't figure out what you did.
( I ( ( ( ca n't ) ( ( figure out ) ( what ( you did ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD ca) (RB n't) (VP (VB figure) (PRT (RP out)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD did)))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
Premise: 'I'll go over your data, find out what you did wrong. Hypothesis: I can't figure out what you did.
19,372
19372e
You will also notice that people don't let traffic time stop their productivity many drivers have their cellular phone attached to their ear.
( You ( ( ( will also ) ( notice ( that ( people ( ( do n't ) ( let ( ( traffic time ) ( ( stop ( their productivity ) ) ( ( many drivers ) ( have ( ( their ( cellular phone ) ) ( attached ( to ( their ear ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (MD will) (ADVP (RB also)) (VP (VB notice) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB let) (S (NP (NN traffic) (NN time)) (VP (VB stop) (NP (PRP$ their) (NN productivity)) (SBAR (S (NP (JJ many) (NNS drivers)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (NP (PRP$ their) (JJ cellular) (NN phon...
A lot of drivers make a point to multi-task while stuck in traffic, often using the time to make calls.
( ( ( A lot ) ( of drivers ) ) ( ( ( ( make ( ( a point ) ( to ( multi-task ( while ( stuck ( in traffic ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( often ( using ( the ( time ( to ( make calls ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT A) (NN lot)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS drivers)))) (VP (VBP make) (S (NP (DT a) (NN point)) (VP (TO to) (VP (VB multi-task) (SBAR (IN while) (S (VP (VBN stuck) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN traffic))))))))) (, ,) (S (ADVP (RB often)) (VP (VBG using) (NP (DT the) (NN time) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB make) (NP (NNS cal...
travel
0entailment
Premise: You will also notice that people don't let traffic time stop their productivity many drivers have their cellular phone attached to their ear. Hypothesis: A lot of drivers make a point to multi-task while stuck in traffic, often using the time to make calls.
127,546
127546n
Some have argued that Boorman, the director of Excalibur (1981) and Hope and Glory (1987), doesn't employ his extravagant visual gifts in The General , which is in black and white and isn't ostentatious in its mythic resonances.
( Some ( ( have ( argued ( that ( ( ( ( Boorman , ) ( ( the director ) ( of ( ( ( ( Excalibur ( -LRB- ( 1981 -RRB- ) ) ) and ) ( ( Hope and ) Glory ) ) ( -LRB- ( 1987 -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( does n't ) ( ( employ ( his ( extravagant ( visual gifts ) ) ) ) ( in ( ( ( The General ) , ) ( which ( ( ( ( is in ) ( ( black...
(ROOT (S (NP (DT Some)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN argued) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (NNP Boorman)) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN director)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Excalibur)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (CD 1981)) (-RRB- -RRB-)) (CC and) (NP (NNP Hope) (CC and) (NNP Glory)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (CD 1987)) (-RRB- -RRB-))))) ...
Boorman won an Oscar for Excalibur.
( Boorman ( ( ( won ( an Oscar ) ) ( for Excalibur ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Boorman)) (VP (VBD won) (NP (DT an) (NNP Oscar)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNP Excalibur)))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: Some have argued that Boorman, the director of Excalibur (1981) and Hope and Glory (1987), doesn't employ his extravagant visual gifts in The General , which is in black and white and isn't ostentatious in its mythic resonances. Hypothesis: Boorman won an Oscar for Excalibur.
2,714
2714n
oh you do that there there is a pretty um i wouldn't say snobbish but it it's kind of borders on that that if i depending on what i'm wearing i get better service at the mall i felt since
( ( oh ( you ( do ( that ( there ( there ( is ( ( a ( pretty um ) ) ( i ( ( would n't ) ( say ( snobbish ( but it ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( ( it 's ) kind ) ( of ( borders ( on ( that ( that ( ( if ( ( i ( depending ( on ( what ( i ( 'm ( wearing i ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( get ( better service ) ) ( at ( the mall ) ) ) ) ...
(ROOT (SINV (VP (VBD oh) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP do) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (EX there)) (ADVP (RB there)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ pretty) (NN um)) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (MD would) (RB n't) (VP (VB say) (NP (NP (JJ snobbish)) (PP (CC but) (NP (PRP it)))))))))))))))) (NP (NP (NP (PRP it) (POS 's)) (NN...
Mall employees are snobbish.
( ( Mall employees ) ( ( are snobbish ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Mall) (NNS employees)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ snobbish))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: oh you do that there there is a pretty um i wouldn't say snobbish but it it's kind of borders on that that if i depending on what i'm wearing i get better service at the mall i felt since Hypothesis: Mall employees are snobbish.
52,900
52900e
Abruptly, I realised why I'd been stumbling.
( Abruptly ( , ( I ( ( realised ( why ( I ( 'd ( been stumbling ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Abruptly)) (, ,) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD realised) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB why)) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD 'd) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBG stumbling))))))) (. .)))
I figured out what I was stumbling.
( I ( ( ( figured out ) ( what ( I ( was stumbling ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD figured) (PRT (RP out)) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBG stumbling)))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: Abruptly, I realised why I'd been stumbling. Hypothesis: I figured out what I was stumbling.
127,594
127594e
An important element of the overall control technology implementation is the time needed to connect, or hook up, the control technology equipment, particularly in relationship to the planned outage time for the unit.
( ( ( An ( important element ) ) ( of ( the ( overall ( control ( technology implementation ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( ( ( ( ( the time ) ( needed ( to connect ) ) ) , ) or ) ( ( ( ( ( ( hook up ) , ) ( the ( control ( technology equipment ) ) ) ) , ) particularly ) ( in ( relationship ( to ( ( the ( planned ( outage time ) ...
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT An) (JJ important) (NN element)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ overall) (NN control) (NN technology) (NN implementation)))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (NP (DT the) (NN time)) (VP (VBN needed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB connect)))))) (, ,) (CC or) (NP (NP (NP (NN hook) (RP up)) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN control) ...
Hooking up the equipment is an important part of implementing control technology.
( ( ( Hooking up ) ( the equipment ) ) ( ( is ( ( an ( important part ) ) ( of ( implementing ( control technology ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBG Hooking) (PRT (RP up)) (NP (DT the) (NN equipment)))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ important) (NN part)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG implementing) (NP (NN control) (NN technology))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
Premise: An important element of the overall control technology implementation is the time needed to connect, or hook up, the control technology equipment, particularly in relationship to the planned outage time for the unit. Hypothesis: Hooking up the equipment is an important part of implementing control technology.
36,154
36154c
Therefore, as shown in Exhibit A-9 in Appendix A, the schedule for a combined SCR and ACI project is expected to be the same as the schedule of an SCR project.
( Therefore ( , ( ( as ( shown ( in ( ( Exhibit A-9 ) ( in ( Appendix A ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( the schedule ) ( for ( a ( combined ( SCR ( and ( ACI project ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( expected ( to ( be ( ( the same ) ( as ( ( the schedule ) ( of ( an ( SCR project ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Therefore)) (, ,) (SBAR (IN as) (S (VP (VBN shown) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (NN Exhibit) (NN A-9)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Appendix) (NNP A)))))))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN schedule)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT a) (JJ combined) (NN SCR) (CC and) (NN ACI) (NN project)))) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN expected) (S (VP (TO...
ACI unnecessarily extends projects when it is added.
( ACI ( unnecessarily ( ( extends ( projects ( when ( it ( is added ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP ACI)) (ADVP (RB unnecessarily)) (VP (VBZ extends) (NP (NP (NNS projects)) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN added))))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: Therefore, as shown in Exhibit A-9 in Appendix A, the schedule for a combined SCR and ACI project is expected to be the same as the schedule of an SCR project. Hypothesis: ACI unnecessarily extends projects when it is added.
9,989
9989e
The preamble to the final rule notes that the rule has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of Executive Order No.
( ( ( The preamble ) ( to ( the ( final rule ) ) ) ) ( ( notes ( that ( ( the rule ) ( has ( been ( ( reviewed ( in accordance ) ) ( with ( ( the provisions ) ( of ( Executive ( Order No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN preamble)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ final) (NN rule)))) (VP (VBZ notes) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NN rule)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN reviewed) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN accordance))) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS provisions)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Executive) (NNP Ord...
There is a note in the preamble stating that the rule has been noticed and reviewed.
( There ( ( is ( ( a note ) ( in ( ( the preamble ) ( stating ( that ( ( the rule ) ( has ( been ( ( noticed and ) reviewed ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN note)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN preamble)) (VP (VBG stating) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NN rule)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN noticed) (CC and) (VBN reviewed))))))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
Premise: The preamble to the final rule notes that the rule has been reviewed in accordance with the provisions of Executive Order No. Hypothesis: There is a note in the preamble stating that the rule has been noticed and reviewed.
11,480
11480n
is allowed for training and monitoring quality.
( ( is ( allowed ( for ( training ( and ( monitoring quality ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN allowed) (PP (IN for) (NP (NN training) (CC and) (NN monitoring) (NN quality))))) (. .)))
Performance evaluations can be used when training or monitoring quality.
( ( Performance evaluations ) ( ( can ( be ( used ( when ( ( ( training or ) monitoring ) quality ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Performance) (NNS evaluations)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN used) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB when)) (S (VP (VBG training) (CC or) (VBG monitoring) (NP (NN quality)))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
Premise: is allowed for training and monitoring quality. Hypothesis: Performance evaluations can be used when training or monitoring quality.
127,476
127476n
Slate and read an excerpt from the book.)
( ( Slate and ) ( ( ( ( read ( an excerpt ) ) ( from ( the book ) ) ) . ) -RRB- ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Slate) (NNP and)) (VP (VBD read) (NP (DT an) (NN excerpt)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NN book)))) (. .) (-RRB- -RRB-)))
Also you must read an excerpt from the book, said the teacher.
( ( Also ( you ( must ( ( read ( an excerpt ) ) ( from ( the book ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( said ( the teacher ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (SINV (S (ADVP (RB Also)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB read) (NP (DT an) (NN excerpt)) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NN book)))))) (, ,) (VP (VBD said)) (NP (DT the) (NN teacher)) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: Slate and read an excerpt from the book.) Hypothesis: Also you must read an excerpt from the book, said the teacher.
84,541
84541e
The large island in the distance is La Desirade, the small Petite-Terre islets are much closer.
( ( ( ( The ( large island ) ) ( in ( the distance ) ) ) ( is ( La Desirade ) ) ) ( , ( ( the ( small ( Petite-Terre islets ) ) ) ( ( are ( much closer ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ large) (NN island)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN distance)))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NNP La) (NNP Desirade)))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (JJ small) (JJ Petite-Terre) (NNS islets)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (RB much) (JJR closer))) (. .)))
La Desirade is a large island visible from far away.
( ( La Desirade ) ( ( is ( ( a ( large island ) ) ( visible ( from ( far away ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP La) (NNP Desirade)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ large) (NN island)) (ADJP (JJ visible) (PP (IN from) (ADVP (RB far) (RB away)))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
Premise: The large island in the distance is La Desirade, the small Petite-Terre islets are much closer. Hypothesis: La Desirade is a large island visible from far away.
42,172
42172c
well she's part Chow and part shepherd
( well ( ( ( ( ( she 's ) ( part Chow ) ) and ) part ) shepherd ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (ADVP (RB well)) (NP (NP (NP (NP (PRP she) (POS 's)) (NN part) (NN Chow)) (CC and) (NP (NN part))) (VP (VBN shepherd)))))
She is a human.
( She ( ( is ( a human ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT a) (NN human))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: well she's part Chow and part shepherd Hypothesis: She is a human.
21,171
21171n
Sales of Bruno Magli shoes are up 30 percent this year.
( ( Sales ( of ( Bruno ( Magli shoes ) ) ) ) ( ( ( are ( up ( 30 percent ) ) ) ( this year ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS Sales)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Bruno) (NNP Magli) (NNS shoes)))) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB up) (NP (CD 30) (NN percent))) (NP (DT this) (NN year))) (. .)))
Bruno Magli shoes are popular with teen-agers this year.
( ( Bruno ( Magli shoes ) ) ( ( are ( popular ( with ( teen-agers ( this year ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Bruno) (NNP Magli) (NNS shoes)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ popular) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (NNS teen-agers)) (NP (DT this) (NN year)))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: Sales of Bruno Magli shoes are up 30 percent this year. Hypothesis: Bruno Magli shoes are popular with teen-agers this year.
100,129
100129e
maybe your part of the country
( ( maybe ( your part ) ) ( of ( the country ) ) )
(ROOT (NP (NP (RB maybe) (PRP$ your) (NN part)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN country)))))
It could be your part of the country.
( It ( ( could ( be ( ( your part ) ( of ( the country ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB be) (NP (NP (PRP$ your) (NN part)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN country)))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
Premise: maybe your part of the country Hypothesis: It could be your part of the country.
16,732
16732n
you know they match it um my wife used to they matched hers only hers was a little bit better than ours um she hasn't been working for a couple of years her father took sick so she's been taking care of him
( you ( know ( they ( match ( it ( um ( ( ( my wife ) ( used ( to they ) ) ) ( matched ( ( hers ( only hers ) ) ( was ( ( ( a ( little bit ) ) better ) ( than ( ours ( um ( she ( ( has n't ) ( been ( working ( for ( ( a couple ) ( of ( years ( ( her father ) ( ( took sick ) ( so ( she ( 's ( been ( taking ( care ( of h...
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP match) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBP um) (SBAR (S (NP (NP (PRP$ my) (NN wife)) (VP (VBN used) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP they))))) (VP (VBD matched) (SBAR (S (NP (JJ hers) (JJ only) (NNS hers)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (ADJP (NP (DT a) (JJ little) (NN bit)...
My wife had to leave to go to her father's place.
( ( My wife ) ( ( had ( to ( leave ( to ( go ( to ( ( her ( father 's ) ) place ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ My) (NN wife)) (VP (VBD had) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB leave) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB go) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (PRP$ her) (NN father) (POS 's)) (NN place)))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: you know they match it um my wife used to they matched hers only hers was a little bit better than ours um she hasn't been working for a couple of years her father took sick so she's been taking care of him Hypothesis: My wife had to leave to go to her father's place.
39,335
39335e
I'm afraid not, sir.
( I ( ( ( ( 'm ( afraid not ) ) , ) sir ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 'm) (ADJP (JJ afraid) (RB not)) (, ,) (ADVP (RB sir))) (. .)))
I don't think so.
( I ( ( ( do n't ) ( think so ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB think) (ADVP (RB so)))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: I'm afraid not, sir. Hypothesis: I don't think so.
48,139
48139e
The favourite dish of many visitors is the Andalusian liquid salad, gazpacho.
( ( ( The ( favourite dish ) ) ( of ( many visitors ) ) ) ( ( is ( ( ( the ( Andalusian ( liquid salad ) ) ) , ) gazpacho ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ favourite) (NN dish)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ many) (NNS visitors)))) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ Andalusian) (JJ liquid) (NN salad)) (, ,) (NP (NN gazpacho)))) (. .)))
Gazpacho is a popular dish among visitors.
( Gazpacho ( ( is ( ( a ( popular dish ) ) ( among visitors ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Gazpacho)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ popular) (NN dish)) (PP (IN among) (NP (NNS visitors))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
Premise: The favourite dish of many visitors is the Andalusian liquid salad, gazpacho. Hypothesis: Gazpacho is a popular dish among visitors.
34,596
34596c
Most corporations, with their skyrocketing pay to CEOs, seem to have turned that formula on its head, believing that they can compete successfully only by duplicating the enormous financial gains someone like Dell has reaped.
( ( ( ( ( Most corporations ) , ) ( with ( ( their ( skyrocketing pay ) ) ( to CEOs ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( seem ( to ( have ( turned ( that ( ( formula ( on ( ( ( its head ) , ) ( believing ( that ( they ( can ( ( compete successfully ) ( only ( by ( duplicating ( ( the ( enormous ( financial ( gains someone ) ) ) ) ( like De...
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (JJS Most) (NNS corporations)) (, ,) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (PRP$ their) (VBG skyrocketing) (NN pay)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNS CEOs))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBP seem) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN turned) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (NN formula)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (PRP$ its) (NN head)) (, ,) (VP (VBG belie...
To avoid being like dell, corporations are trying to use different methods than them
( ( To ( avoid ( being ( like dell ) ) ) ) ( , ( corporations ( are ( trying ( to ( ( use ( different methods ) ) ( than them ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (VP (TO To) (VP (VB avoid) (S (VP (VBG being) (PP (IN like) (NP (NN dell)))))))) (, ,) (NP (NNS corporations)) (VP (VBP are) (VP (VBG trying) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB use) (NP (JJ different) (NNS methods)) (PP (IN than) (NP (PRP them))))))))))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: Most corporations, with their skyrocketing pay to CEOs, seem to have turned that formula on its head, believing that they can compete successfully only by duplicating the enormous financial gains someone like Dell has reaped. Hypothesis: To avoid being like dell, corporations are trying to use different method...
95,163
95163e
The doctor no longer practiced, had retired, the landlord believed, but he took a few private patients here the good fellow tapped his forehead knowingly "balmy ones!
( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( The doctor ) ( ( no longer ) practiced ) ) , ) ( had retired ) ) ( , ( ( ( the landlord ) believed ) , ) ) ) but ) ( he ( ( took ( a ( few ( private patients ) ) ) ) ( ( here ( the ( good fellow ) ) ) ( ( ( tapped ( his ( forehead knowingly ) ) ) `` ) ( balmy ones ) ) ) ) ) ) ! )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN doctor)) (RRC (ADVP (RB no) (RB longer)) (ADJP (JJ practiced))) (, ,)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN retired)))) (PRN (, ,) (S (NP (DT the) (NN landlord)) (VP (VBD believed))) (, ,)) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD took) (NP (DT a) (JJ few) (JJ private) (NNS patients)) (NP (NP (RB here) (DT...
The landlord thought that the doctor no longer was in practice.
( ( The landlord ) ( ( thought ( that ( ( the doctor ) ( ( no longer ) ( was ( in practice ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN landlord)) (VP (VBD thought) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NN doctor)) (ADVP (RB no) (RB longer)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN practice))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: The doctor no longer practiced, had retired, the landlord believed, but he took a few private patients here the good fellow tapped his forehead knowingly "balmy ones! Hypothesis: The landlord thought that the doctor no longer was in practice.
128,551
128551e
The trees, originally planted by the Carthaginians in 300 b.c. or thereabouts, thrive under irrigation.
( ( ( ( ( The trees ) , ) ( originally ( ( planted ( by ( the Carthaginians ) ) ) ( in ( ( ( 300 b.c. ) or ) thereabouts ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( thrive ( under irrigation ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS trees)) (, ,) (VP (ADVP (RB originally)) (VBN planted) (PP (IN by) (NP (DT the) (NNPS Carthaginians))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (CD 300) (NN b.c.)) (CC or) (NP (NNS thereabouts))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBP thrive) (PP (IN under) (NP (NN irrigation)))) (. .)))
The trees are able to thrive due to irrigation.
( ( The trees ) ( ( are ( able ( to ( thrive ( due ( to irrigation ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNS trees)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ able) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB thrive) (ADJP (JJ due) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN irrigation))))))))) (. .)))
travel
0entailment
Premise: The trees, originally planted by the Carthaginians in 300 b.c. or thereabouts, thrive under irrigation. Hypothesis: The trees are able to thrive due to irrigation.
58,644
58644e
She quieted, trembling.
( She ( ( ( quieted , ) trembling ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VBD quieted) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG trembling)))) (. .)))
She clammed up, and got visibly nervous.
( She ( ( ( ( ( clammed up ) , ) and ) ( got ( visibly nervous ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP She)) (VP (VP (VBD clammed) (PRT (RP up))) (, ,) (CC and) (VP (VBD got) (ADJP (RB visibly) (JJ nervous)))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: She quieted, trembling. Hypothesis: She clammed up, and got visibly nervous.
144,860
144860c
If those subway ads are more effective against the cautious Martins than against the reckless Maxwells, then they are a threat to the hapless Joans.
( ( If ( ( those ( subway ads ) ) ( ( are ( more ( effective ( against ( ( the ( cautious Martins ) ) than ) ) ) ) ) ( against ( the ( reckless Maxwells ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( then ( they ( ( are ( ( a threat ) ( to ( the ( hapless Joans ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN If) (S (NP (DT those) (NN subway) (NNS ads)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ effective) (PP (IN against) (ADVP (NP (DT the) (JJ cautious) (NNS Martins)) (IN than)))) (PP (IN against) (NP (DT the) (JJ reckless) (NNS Maxwells)))))) (, ,) (ADVP (RB then)) (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (DT a) ...
The Maxwells are more cautious than the Martins are.
( ( The Maxwells ) ( ( are ( ( more cautious ) ( than ( ( the Martins ) are ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNPS Maxwells)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ cautious)) (SBAR (IN than) (S (NP (DT the) (NNPS Martins)) (VP (VBP are)))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: If those subway ads are more effective against the cautious Martins than against the reckless Maxwells, then they are a threat to the hapless Joans. Hypothesis: The Maxwells are more cautious than the Martins are.
142,457
142457n
Among other parts of Spain, Andaluc?­a is more folkloric, Catalonia and the Basque country more proudly independent.
( ( Among ( ( other parts ) ( of Spain ) ) ) ( , ( Andaluc?a ( ( ( ( ( is ( more folkloric ) ) , ) ( ( ( Catalonia and ) ( the ( Basque country ) ) ) more ) ) ( proudly independent ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Among) (NP (NP (JJ other) (NNS parts)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Spain))))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Andaluc?a)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RBR more) (JJ folkloric)) (, ,) (ADVP (NP (NP (NNP Catalonia)) (CC and) (NP (DT the) (JJ Basque) (NN country))) (RBR more)) (ADJP (ADVP (RB proudly)) (JJ independent))) (. .)))
Andalucia has always been known for being folkloric.
( Andalucia ( ( ( has always ) ( been ( known ( for ( being folkloric ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Andalucia)) (VP (VBZ has) (ADVP (RB always)) (VP (VBN been) (VP (VBN known) (PP (IN for) (S (VP (VBG being) (ADJP (JJ folkloric)))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
Premise: Among other parts of Spain, Andaluc?­a is more folkloric, Catalonia and the Basque country more proudly independent. Hypothesis: Andalucia has always been known for being folkloric.
77,854
77854n
We're not talking conspiracy theory It's all quite legal, and more or less aboveboard.
( We ( ( ( 're not ) ( talking ( ( conspiracy theory ) ( It ( ( 's all ) ( ( ( ( quite legal ) , ) and ) ( ( ( more or ) less ) aboveboard ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP We)) (VP (VBP 're) (RB not) (VP (VBG talking) (NP (NP (NN conspiracy) (NN theory)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ 's) (RB all) (ADJP (ADJP (RB quite) (JJ legal)) (, ,) (CC and) (ADJP (ADVP (RBR more) (CC or) (RBR less)) (JJ aboveboard))))))))) (. .)))
It seems like a conspiracy theory, but it can be easily explained.
( ( ( ( ( It ( seems ( like ( a ( conspiracy theory ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( it ( can ( be ( easily explained ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ seems) (PP (IN like) (NP (DT a) (NN conspiracy) (NN theory))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB be) (VP (ADVP (RB easily)) (VBN explained))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: We're not talking conspiracy theory It's all quite legal, and more or less aboveboard. Hypothesis: It seems like a conspiracy theory, but it can be easily explained.
43,768
43768c
yeah or sometimes they don't like either of the choices
( ( ( yeah or ) sometimes ) ( they ( ( do n't ) ( like ( either ( of ( the choices ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBAR (UCP (NP (NN yeah)) (CC or) (ADVP (RB sometimes))) (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB like) (NP (NP (DT either)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NNS choices)))))))))
They don't like the choices 100% of the time.
( They ( ( ( do n't ) ( like ( ( ( the choices ) ( 100 % ) ) ( of ( the time ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB like) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS choices)) (ADJP (CD 100) (NN %)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN time)))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: yeah or sometimes they don't like either of the choices Hypothesis: They don't like the choices 100% of the time.
43,716
43716e
oh i'm sure it must yes you know i'm not personally involved because i don't you know i don't have any children that wear diapers but i'm sure it creates a large amount of you know uh refuse
( oh ( ( ( ( ( i ( 'm ( sure ( it must ) ) ) ) ( yes ( you ( know ( i ( ( 'm not ) ( ( personally involved ) ( because ( i ( do n't ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( you ( know ( i ( ( do n't ) ( have ( ( any children ) ( that ( wear diapers ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) but ) ( i ( 'm ( sure ( it ( creates ( ( ( a ( large amount ) ) ( of you...
(ROOT (S (VP (VB oh) (S (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (ADJP (JJ sure) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD must))))))) (S (INTJ (UH yes)) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP know) (SBAR (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (RB not) (ADJP (ADJP (RB personally) (VBN involved)) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't)))))))))) (S (NP (...
I don't have any children that wear diapers.
( I ( ( ( do n't ) ( have ( ( any children ) ( that ( wear diapers ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (DT any) (NNS children)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP wear) (NP (NNS diapers)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
Premise: oh i'm sure it must yes you know i'm not personally involved because i don't you know i don't have any children that wear diapers but i'm sure it creates a large amount of you know uh refuse Hypothesis: I don't have any children that wear diapers.
54,830
54830c
I would like to put this report in its proper perspective.
( I ( ( would ( like ( to ( put ( ( this report ) ( in ( its ( proper perspective ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB like) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB put) (NP (NP (DT this) (NN report)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ its) (JJ proper) (NN perspective))))))))) (. .)))
This report is virtually impossible to misinterpret.
( ( This report ) ( ( ( is ( virtually impossible ) ) ( to misinterpret ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT This) (NN report)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB virtually) (JJ impossible)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB misinterpret))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: I would like to put this report in its proper perspective. Hypothesis: This report is virtually impossible to misinterpret.
136,040
136040n
The French empire was collapsing.
( ( The ( French empire ) ) ( ( was collapsing ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ French) (NN empire)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (VBG collapsing))) (. .)))
The French empire was previously strong.
( ( The ( French empire ) ) ( ( was ( previously strong ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ French) (NN empire)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB previously) (JJ strong))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
Premise: The French empire was collapsing. Hypothesis: The French empire was previously strong.
9,054
9054n
Over the treetops you catch an occasional glimpse of the skyscrapers of modern Tokyo.
( ( Over ( the treetops ) ) ( you ( ( catch ( ( an ( occasional glimpse ) ) ( of ( ( the skyscrapers ) ( of ( modern Tokyo ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Over) (NP (DT the) (NNS treetops))) (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP catch) (NP (NP (DT an) (JJ occasional) (NN glimpse)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS skyscrapers)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ modern) (NNP Tokyo))))))) (. .)))
There are many trees around the Imperial Palace of Tokyo.
( There ( ( are ( ( many trees ) ( around ( ( the ( Imperial Palace ) ) ( of Tokyo ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (JJ many) (NNS trees)) (PP (IN around) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Imperial) (NNP Palace)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Tokyo))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
Premise: Over the treetops you catch an occasional glimpse of the skyscrapers of modern Tokyo. Hypothesis: There are many trees around the Imperial Palace of Tokyo.
39,933
39933c
Parents of SIDS babies have been wrongly accused in the past.
( ( Parents ( of ( SIDS babies ) ) ) ( ( have ( been ( wrongly ( accused ( in ( the past ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS Parents)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP SIDS) (NNS babies)))) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN been) (VP (ADVP (RB wrongly)) (VBN accused) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN past)))))) (. .)))
SIDS babies parents have never been wrongly accused, period.
( ( SIDS ( babies parents ) ) ( ( ( have never ) ( ( been wrongly ) ( ( accused , ) period ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS SIDS) (NNS babies) (NNS parents)) (VP (VBP have) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBN been) (ADVP (RB wrongly)) (VP (VBN accused) (, ,) (NP (NN period))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: Parents of SIDS babies have been wrongly accused in the past. Hypothesis: SIDS babies parents have never been wrongly accused, period.
109,095
109095n
you're at yeah you're right across the uh lake from what Plattsburgh
( you ( 're ( at ( yeah ( you ( 're ( right ( across ( ( the ( uh lake ) ) ( from ( what Plattsburgh ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (PP (IN at) (NP (NP (NN yeah)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP 're) (ADJP (JJ right) (PP (IN across) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ uh) (NN lake)) (PP (IN from) (SBAR (WHNP (WP what)) (S (VP (VBP Plattsburgh))))))))))))))))
It wouldn't take you long to walk to Plattsburgh.
( It ( ( ( would n't ) ( take ( you ( long ( to ( walk ( to Plattsburgh ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (MD would) (RB n't) (VP (VB take) (S (NP (PRP you)) (ADJP (JJ long) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB walk) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP Plattsburgh)))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: you're at yeah you're right across the uh lake from what Plattsburgh Hypothesis: It wouldn't take you long to walk to Plattsburgh.
137,976
137976c
Randy's Full Responsibility Wraparound
( ( ( Randy 's ) ( Full Responsibility ) ) Wraparound )
(ROOT (FRAG (NP (NP (NNP Randy) (POS 's)) (NNP Full) (NNP Responsibility)) (ADJP (JJ Wraparound))))
Randy's acceptance of responsibility
( ( ( Randy 's ) acceptance ) ( of responsibility ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (NP (NP (NNP Randy) (POS 's)) (NN acceptance)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN responsibility)))))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: Randy's Full Responsibility Wraparound Hypothesis: Randy's acceptance of responsibility
133,909
133909n
i had never thought about that i could probably plant one and bring it in and just like i bring my plants in every year
( i ( ( had never ) ( thought ( about ( ( ( that ( i ( ( could probably ) ( ( ( plant one ) and ) ( ( bring it ) in ) ) ) ) ) and ) ( just ( like ( i ( ( bring ( my plants ) ) ( in ( every year ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD had) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBN thought) (PP (IN about) (SBAR (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (MD could) (ADVP (RB probably)) (VP (VP (VB plant) (NP (CD one))) (CC and) (VP (VB bring) (NP (PRP it)) (PP (IN in))))))) (CC and) (SBAR (RB just) (IN like) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP bring) (NP (...
That's a great idea to bring plant one and bring it in.
( That ( ( 's ( a ( great ( idea ( to ( ( ( bring ( plant one ) ) and ) ( ( bring it ) in ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (DT a) (JJ great) (NN idea) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VP (VB bring) (NP (NN plant) (NN one))) (CC and) (VP (VB bring) (NP (PRP it)) (PP (IN in)))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: i had never thought about that i could probably plant one and bring it in and just like i bring my plants in every year Hypothesis: That's a great idea to bring plant one and bring it in.
22,835
22835c
This creates an incentive for continual improvement in environmental performance.
( This ( ( creates ( ( an incentive ) ( for ( ( continual improvement ) ( in ( environmental performance ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT This)) (VP (VBZ creates) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN incentive)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJ continual) (NN improvement)) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ environmental) (NN performance))))))) (. .)))
Incentives are definitely not required for continual improvement in the environment.
( Incentives ( ( ( are definitely ) ( not ( required ( for ( ( continual improvement ) ( in ( the environment ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Incentives)) (VP (VBP are) (ADVP (RB definitely)) (VP (RB not) (VBN required) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJ continual) (NN improvement)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN environment))))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: This creates an incentive for continual improvement in environmental performance. Hypothesis: Incentives are definitely not required for continual improvement in the environment.
104,812
104812c
The latter was a royal palace for much longer than Versailles, with certain additions made over seven centuries, notably from Franaois I in the 16th century.
( ( The latter ) ( ( ( ( ( ( was ( ( a ( royal palace ) ) ( for ( ( much longer ) ( than Versailles ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( with ( ( certain additions ) ( made ( over ( seven centuries ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( notably ( from ( ( Franaois I ) ( in ( the ( 16th century ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN latter)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ royal) (NN palace)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (RB much) (JJR longer)) (PP (IN than) (NP (NNP Versailles)))))) (, ,) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (JJ certain) (NNS additions)) (VP (VBN made) (PP (IN over) (NP (CD seven) (NNS centuries)))))) (, ,) (PP (ADVP (RB nota...
Versailles has been the royal palace for longer than any other palace.
( Versailles ( ( has ( been ( ( the ( royal palace ) ) ( for ( longer ( than ( any ( other palace ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Versailles)) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN been) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ royal) (NN palace)) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (JJR longer)) (PP (IN than) (NP (DT any) (JJ other) (NN palace)))))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
Premise: The latter was a royal palace for much longer than Versailles, with certain additions made over seven centuries, notably from Franaois I in the 16th century. Hypothesis: Versailles has been the royal palace for longer than any other palace.
113,985
113985e
California's law suggests letting state workers give the injections without medical supervision, but the serious side effects, and the need to ensure that appropriate doses are given, make this approach foolhardy.
( ( ( ( ( ( ( California 's ) law ) ( suggests ( letting ( ( state workers ) ( ( give ( the injections ) ) ( without ( medical supervision ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) but ) ( ( ( ( ( ( the ( serious ( side effects ) ) ) , ) and ) ( the ( need ( to ( ensure ( that ( ( appropriate doses ) ( are given ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( make ( (...
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NP (NNP California) (POS 's)) (NN law)) (VP (VBZ suggests) (S (VP (VBG letting) (S (NP (NN state) (NNS workers)) (VP (VB give) (NP (DT the) (NNS injections)) (PP (IN without) (NP (JJ medical) (NN supervision))))))))) (, ,) (CC but) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ serious) (NN side) (NNS effects)) (, ,) (CC and...
A law in California suggest that workers be allowed to give injections without medical supervision.
( ( ( A law ) ( in California ) ) ( ( suggest ( that ( workers ( be ( allowed ( to ( ( give injections ) ( without ( medical supervision ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT A) (NN law)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP California)))) (VP (VBP suggest) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NNS workers)) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN allowed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB give) (NP (NNS injections)) (PP (IN without) (NP (JJ medical) (NN supervision))))))))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
Premise: California's law suggests letting state workers give the injections without medical supervision, but the serious side effects, and the need to ensure that appropriate doses are given, make this approach foolhardy. Hypothesis: A law in California suggest that workers be allowed to give injections without medica...
106,955
106955n
who stirs inarticulate passion by singing very much like a woman (Mark Levine, The New Yorker ). Critics are surprised by the success of the New York City Opera at transposing Handel's piece from ancient Greece to 18 th -century England.
( ( who ( ( ( stirs ( inarticulate passion ) ) ( by ( ( singing ( very much ) ) ( like ( ( a woman ) ( -LRB- ( ( ( ( Mark Levine ) , ) ( The ( New Yorker ) ) ) -RRB- ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ( Critics ( ( are ( ( surprised ( by ( ( the success ) ( of ( the ( New ( York ( City Opera ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( at ( ( transposing ( ( (...
(ROOT (S (SBARQ (WHNP (WP who)) (SQ (VP (VBZ stirs) (NP (JJ inarticulate) (NN passion)) (PP (IN by) (S (VP (VBG singing) (ADVP (RB very) (RB much)) (PP (IN like) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN woman)) (PRN (-LRB- -LRB-) (NP (NNP Mark) (NNP Levine)) (, ,) (NP (DT The) (NNP New) (NNP Yorker)) (-RRB- -RRB-))))))))) (. .)) (NP (NNS Cr...
Critics said the opera done bad job transposing Handel's piece.
( Critics ( ( said ( ( the opera ) ( ( done ( bad job ) ) ( transposing ( ( Handel 's ) piece ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNS Critics)) (VP (VBD said) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN opera)) (VP (VBN done) (NP (JJ bad) (NN job)) (S (VP (VBG transposing) (NP (NP (NNP Handel) (POS 's)) (NN piece))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: who stirs inarticulate passion by singing very much like a woman (Mark Levine, The New Yorker ). Critics are surprised by the success of the New York City Opera at transposing Handel's piece from ancient Greece to 18 th -century England. Hypothesis: Critics said the opera done bad job transposing Handel's pie...
46,397
46397n
From the fall of the Roman Empire to the 19th century, it stood outside the mainstream of Italian history.
( ( From ( ( the fall ) ( of ( ( the ( Roman Empire ) ) ( to ( the ( 19th century ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( it ( ( stood ( outside ( ( the mainstream ) ( of ( Italian history ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN From) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN fall)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP Roman) (NNP Empire)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ 19th) (NN century))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD stood) (PP (IN outside) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN mainstream)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ Italian) (NN history)))))) (. .)))
Historically, it was closer to France than the rest of Italy.
( Historically ( , ( it ( ( ( was ( closer ( to France ) ) ) ( than ( ( the rest ) ( of Italy ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Historically)) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (ADJP (JJR closer)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NNP France)))) (PP (IN than) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN rest)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNP Italy)))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
Premise: From the fall of the Roman Empire to the 19th century, it stood outside the mainstream of Italian history. Hypothesis: Historically, it was closer to France than the rest of Italy.
61,535
61535n
Complimentary access to San San beach; nature trails lead through a rain-forest environment.
( ( ( ( Complimentary ( access ( to ( ( San San ) beach ) ) ) ) ; ) ( ( nature trails ) ( lead ( through ( a ( rain-forest environment ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (ADVP (RB Complimentary)) (VP (VB access) (PP (TO to) (NP (ADJP (NNP San) (NNP San)) (NN beach))))) (: ;) (S (NP (NN nature) (NNS trails)) (VP (VBP lead) (PP (IN through) (NP (DT a) (JJ rain-forest) (NN environment))))) (. .)))
There is free access to the San San beach down the road.
( There ( ( is ( ( free access ) ( to ( ( the ( ( San San ) beach ) ) ( down ( the road ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (JJ free) (NN access)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (ADJP (NNP San) (NNP San)) (NN beach)) (ADVP (RB down) (NP (DT the) (NN road))))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
Premise: Complimentary access to San San beach; nature trails lead through a rain-forest environment. Hypothesis: There is free access to the San San beach down the road.
69,389
69389c
How far the boy had come.
( ( ( How far ) ( ( the boy ) ( had come ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (FRAG (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB How) (RB far)) (S (NP (DT the) (NN boy)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN come))))) (. .)))
The boy stayed where he was.
( ( The boy ) ( ( stayed ( where ( he was ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN boy)) (VP (VBD stayed) (SBAR (WHADVP (WRB where)) (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (VBD was))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
Premise: How far the boy had come. Hypothesis: The boy stayed where he was.
57,749
57749n
Of course, as stated earlier, the effectiveness of this principle is moderated by the extent to which the other principles have been implemented.
( ( Of course ) ( , ( ( as ( stated earlier ) ) ( , ( ( ( the effectiveness ) ( of ( this principle ) ) ) ( ( is ( moderated ( by ( ( the extent ) ( ( to which ) ( ( the ( other principles ) ) ( have ( been implemented ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Of) (NP (NN course))) (, ,) (PP (IN as) (ADVP (NP (CD stated)) (RBR earlier))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN effectiveness)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT this) (NN principle)))) (VP (VBZ is) (VP (VBN moderated) (PP (IN by) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN extent)) (SBAR (WHPP (TO to) (WHNP (WDT which))) (S (NP (DT the) (JJ ot...
Without the application of the other principles, this principle stands no change of success.
( ( Without ( ( the application ) ( of ( the ( other principles ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( this principle ) ( ( stands ( ( no change ) ( of success ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (IN Without) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN application)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (JJ other) (NNS principles))))) (, ,) (NP (DT this) (NN principle)) (VP (VBZ stands) (NP (NP (DT no) (NN change)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN success))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
Premise: Of course, as stated earlier, the effectiveness of this principle is moderated by the extent to which the other principles have been implemented. Hypothesis: Without the application of the other principles, this principle stands no change of success.
124,336
124336e
Unfortunately, at the time I was so sure of myself that I even self-imposed a deadline.
( Unfortunately ( , ( ( at ( the time ) ) ( I ( ( ( was ( so ( sure ( of myself ) ) ) ) ( that ( I ( even ( self-imposed ( a deadline ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Unfortunately)) (, ,) (PP (IN at) (NP (DT the) (NN time))) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB so) (JJ sure) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP myself)))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP I)) (ADVP (RB even)) (VP (VBZ self-imposed) (NP (DT a) (NN deadline)))))) (. .)))
I imposed a deadline on myself because I was so sure in my abilities.
( I ( ( ( ( imposed ( a deadline ) ) ( on myself ) ) ( because ( I ( ( was ( so sure ) ) ( in ( my abilities ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD imposed) (NP (DT a) (NN deadline)) (PP (IN on) (NP (PRP myself))) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB so) (JJ sure)) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ my) (NNS abilities))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: Unfortunately, at the time I was so sure of myself that I even self-imposed a deadline. Hypothesis: I imposed a deadline on myself because I was so sure in my abilities.
72,406
72406n
USA Today posts top China stories, many of them from the Associated Press.
( ( USA ( Today posts ) ) ( ( ( top ( ( ( China stories ) , ) ( many ( of them ) ) ) ) ( from ( the ( Associated Press ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP USA) (NNP Today) (NNS posts)) (VP (VBP top) (NP (NP (NNP China) (NNS stories)) (, ,) (NP (NP (JJ many)) (PP (IN of) (NP (PRP them))))) (PP (IN from) (NP (DT the) (NNP Associated) (NNP Press)))) (. .)))
The post was about the Chinese missile program being launched that week.
( ( The post ) ( ( was ( about ( ( the ( Chinese ( missile program ) ) ) ( being ( launched ( that week ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN post)) (VP (VBD was) (PP (IN about) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ Chinese) (NN missile) (NN program)) (VP (VBG being) (VP (VBN launched) (NP (DT that) (NN week))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: USA Today posts top China stories, many of them from the Associated Press. Hypothesis: The post was about the Chinese missile program being launched that week.
51,921
51921e
That is due, in large part, to the personality of Steve Case, who is indeed a smart and clever guy and someone I would not often bet against.
( ( That ( ( ( ( ( is due ) , ) ( in ( large part ) ) ) , ) ( to ( ( the personality ) ( of ( ( ( Steve Case ) , ) ( who ( ( is indeed ) ( a ( ( ( smart and ) clever ) ( ( guy and ) someone ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( I ( ( ( ( would not ) often ) ( bet against ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT That)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ due)) (, ,) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJ large) (NN part))) (, ,) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN personality)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNP Steve) (NNP Case)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WP who)) (S (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB indeed)) (NP (DT a) (ADJP (JJ smart) (CC and) (JJ clever)) (NN guy) ...
Steve Case is successful and smart.
( ( Steve Case ) ( ( is ( ( successful and ) smart ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Steve) (NNP Case)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ successful) (CC and) (JJ smart))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
Premise: That is due, in large part, to the personality of Steve Case, who is indeed a smart and clever guy and someone I would not often bet against. Hypothesis: Steve Case is successful and smart.
13,181
13181c
that's like my husband does that he can watch them over and over and i'm there's very few i would want to see that many times so he he once he has one he likes he likes to watch it over and over
( that ( 's ( like ( ( my husband ) ( does ( that ( ( ( he ( can ( ( watch them ) ( ( over and ) over ) ) ) ) and ) ( i ( 'm ( there ( ( ( 's ( very few ) ) ( i ( would ( want ( to ( ( see ( that ( many times ) ) ) ( so ( he he ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( once ( he ( has ( one ( he ( likes ( he ( likes ( to ( ( watch it ) ( ( ov...
(ROOT (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBZ 's) (SBAR (IN like) (S (NP (PRP$ my) (NN husband)) (VP (VBZ does) (SBAR (IN that) (S (S (NP (PRP he)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB watch) (NP (PRP them)) (ADVP (RP over) (CC and) (RP over))))) (CC and) (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBP 'm) (SBAR (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (RB very) (J...
My husband never repeats a movie.
( ( My husband ) ( never ( ( repeats ( a movie ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ My) (NN husband)) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBZ repeats) (NP (DT a) (NN movie))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: that's like my husband does that he can watch them over and over and i'm there's very few i would want to see that many times so he he once he has one he likes he likes to watch it over and over Hypothesis: My husband never repeats a movie.
38,995
38995n
(Having seen so many episodes and observed the formula, I have thought it would be amusing to write an episode set in a think tank.
( -LRB- ( ( Having ( ( ( seen ( ( so many ) episodes ) ) and ) ( observed ( the formula ) ) ) ) ( ( , ( I ( have thought ) ) ) ( it ( ( would ( be ( amusing ( to ( write ( ( an episode ) ( set ( in ( a ( think tank ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (-LRB- -LRB-) (S (VP (VBG Having) (VP (VP (VBN seen) (NP (ADJP (RB so) (JJ many)) (NNS episodes))) (CC and) (VP (VBD observed) (NP (DT the) (NN formula)))))) (PRN (, ,) (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN thought))))) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ amusing) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB write)...
I want to write an episode exactly like the show I've watched.
( I ( ( want ( to ( ( ( write ( an episode ) ) exactly ) ( like ( ( the show ) ( I ( 've watched ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP want) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB write) (NP (DT an) (NN episode)) (ADVP (RB exactly)) (PP (IN like) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN show)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN watched))))))))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: (Having seen so many episodes and observed the formula, I have thought it would be amusing to write an episode set in a think tank. Hypothesis: I want to write an episode exactly like the show I've watched.
46,655
46655c
Tommy's ambition was somehow or other to gain admission to the house itself.
( ( ( Tommy 's ) ambition ) ( ( was ( ( ( somehow or ) other ) ( to ( ( gain admission ) ( to ( ( the house ) itself ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Tommy) (POS 's)) (NN ambition)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ somehow) (CC or) (JJ other) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB gain) (NP (NN admission)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN house)) (ADVP (PRP itself))))))))) (. .)))
Tommy wasn't very motivated to try and get into the house.
( Tommy ( ( ( was n't ) ( very ( motivated ( to ( ( ( try and ) get ) ( into ( the house ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Tommy)) (VP (VBD was) (RB n't) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ motivated) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB try) (CC and) (VB get) (PP (IN into) (NP (DT the) (NN house)))))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
Premise: Tommy's ambition was somehow or other to gain admission to the house itself. Hypothesis: Tommy wasn't very motivated to try and get into the house.
96,546
96546c
The FCC prepared both an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis and a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in connection with the proposed rulemaking and the final rule, respectively.
( ( The FCC ) ( ( ( ( ( ( prepared ( both ( ( ( an ( Initial ( Regulatory ( Flexibility Analysis ) ) ) ) and ) ( a ( Final ( Regulatory ( Flexibility Analysis ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( in connection ) ) ( with ( ( ( the ( proposed rulemaking ) ) and ) ( the ( final rule ) ) ) ) ) , ) respectively ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP FCC)) (VP (VBD prepared) (NP (PDT both) (NP (DT an) (JJ Initial) (NNP Regulatory) (NNP Flexibility) (NN Analysis)) (CC and) (NP (DT a) (NNP Final) (NNP Regulatory) (NNP Flexibility) (NNP Analysis))) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN connection))) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ proposed) (NN rulemaking)...
The FCC did not have anything prepared.
( ( The FCC ) ( ( ( did not ) ( have ( anything prepared ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP FCC)) (VP (VBD did) (RB not) (VP (VB have) (NP (NP (NN anything)) (VP (VBN prepared))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: The FCC prepared both an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis and a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in connection with the proposed rulemaking and the final rule, respectively. Hypothesis: The FCC did not have anything prepared.
58,935
58935c
Unmade Beds might make a good date movie.
( ( Unmade Beds ) ( ( might ( make ( a ( good ( date movie ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Unmade) (NNP Beds)) (VP (MD might) (VP (VB make) (NP (DT a) (JJ good) (NN date) (NN movie)))) (. .)))
Unmade Beds should not be seen with anyone you love or even just like.
( ( Unmade Beds ) ( ( ( should not ) ( ( ( be ( seen ( with ( anyone ( you love ) ) ) ) ) or ) ( even ( just like ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Unmade) (NNP Beds)) (VP (MD should) (RB not) (VP (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN seen) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (NN anyone)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP love)))))))) (CC or) (VP (ADVP (RB even)) (ADVP (RB just)) (VB like)))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: Unmade Beds might make a good date movie. Hypothesis: Unmade Beds should not be seen with anyone you love or even just like.
20,488
20488c
The story begins 3.4 billion years ago with displays of fossils and rock, marking the geological changes that forged the landscape.
( ( The story ) ( ( ( ( ( begins ( ( ( 3.4 billion ) years ) ago ) ) ( with ( displays ( of ( ( fossils and ) rock ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( marking ( ( the ( geological changes ) ) ( that ( forged ( the landscape ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN story)) (VP (VBZ begins) (ADVP (NP (QP (CD 3.4) (CD billion)) (NNS years)) (RB ago)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NP (NNS displays)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS fossils) (CC and) (NN rock))))) (, ,) (S (VP (VBG marking) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ geological) (NNS changes)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBN forged)...
There is nothing older than 4000 years old on display.
( There ( ( ( is ( ( nothing older ) ( than ( ( 4000 years ) old ) ) ) ) ( on display ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (ADJP (NN nothing) (JJR older)) (PP (IN than) (ADJP (NP (CD 4000) (NNS years)) (JJ old)))) (PP (IN on) (NP (NN display)))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
Premise: The story begins 3.4 billion years ago with displays of fossils and rock, marking the geological changes that forged the landscape. Hypothesis: There is nothing older than 4000 years old on display.
48,578
48578n
i thought that was a good movie and uh about a week ago we went out and saw uh Silence of the Lambs
( i ( thought ( that ( was ( ( ( ( a ( good movie ) ) and ) ( uh ( about ( a ( week ago ) ) ) ) ) ( we ( ( ( went out ) and ) ( saw ( ( uh Silence ) ( of ( the Lambs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (FW i)) (VP (VBD thought) (SBAR (IN that) (S (VP (VBD was) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ good) (NN movie)) (CC and) (ADVP (RB uh) (PP (IN about) (NP (DT a) (NN week) (IN ago)))) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VP (VBD went) (PRT (RP out))) (CC and) (VP (VBD saw) (NP (NP (JJ uh) (NN Silence)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN ...
I took several friends to watch Silence of the Lambs a week ago.
( I ( ( ( took ( several friends ) ) ( to ( watch ( Silence ( of ( ( the Lambs ) ( ( a week ) ago ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD took) (NP (JJ several) (NNS friends)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB watch) (NP (NP (NN Silence)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN Lambs)) (ADVP (NP (DT a) (NN week)) (RB ago))))))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: i thought that was a good movie and uh about a week ago we went out and saw uh Silence of the Lambs Hypothesis: I took several friends to watch Silence of the Lambs a week ago.
95,371
95371e
I left something to be analysed.
( I ( ( ( left something ) ( to ( be analysed ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD left) (NP (NN something)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN analysed)))))) (. .)))
Something still requires analysis.
( Something ( still ( ( requires analysis ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN Something)) (ADVP (RB still)) (VP (VBZ requires) (NP (NN analysis))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: I left something to be analysed. Hypothesis: Something still requires analysis.
144,959
144959c
Although not applicable to attestation engagements, the AICPA statements on auditing standards may provide useful guidance related to fraud for auditors performing attestation engagements in accordance with GAGAS.
( ( Although ( not ( applicable ( to ( attestation engagements ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( ( the ( AICPA statements ) ) ( on ( auditing standards ) ) ) ( ( may ( ( provide ( ( useful guidance ) ( ( related ( to ( fraud ( for ( auditors performing ) ) ) ) ) ( attestation engagements ) ) ) ) ( in ( accordance ( with GAGAS ) ) ) ) ...
(ROOT (S (SBAR (IN Although) (S (RB not) (ADJP (JJ applicable) (PP (TO to) (NP (NN attestation) (NNS engagements)))))) (, ,) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP AICPA) (NNS statements)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NN auditing) (NNS standards)))) (VP (MD may) (VP (VB provide) (NP (ADJP (JJ useful) (NN guidance)) (ADJP (VBN related) (PP (TO to) ...
The AICPA's statements in regards to auditing standards apply to attestation engagements.
( ( ( ( The ( AICPA 's ) ) statements ) ( in ( ( ( regards to ) auditing ) standards ) ) ) ( ( apply ( to ( attestation engagements ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NP (DT The) (NNP AICPA) (POS 's)) (NNS statements)) (PP (IN in) (NP (QP (CD regards) (TO to) (CD auditing)) (NNS standards)))) (VP (VBP apply) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB attestation) (NP (NNS engagements)))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: Although not applicable to attestation engagements, the AICPA statements on auditing standards may provide useful guidance related to fraud for auditors performing attestation engagements in accordance with GAGAS. Hypothesis: The AICPA's statements in regards to auditing standards apply to attestation engageme...
107,104
107104c
There is no reason to change the law, Shuger's evident wish to do so aside.
( ( There ( is ( no ( reason ( to ( change ( the law ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( Shuger ( ( 's ( evident ( wish ( to ( do ( so aside ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT no) (NN reason) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB change) (NP (DT the) (NN law)))))))) (, ,) (NP (NNP Shuger)) (VP (VBZ 's) (ADJP (JJ evident) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP wish) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB do) (ADVP (RB so) (RB aside)))))))))) (. .)))
Shuger thinks that the law should not be changed.
( Shuger ( ( thinks ( that ( ( the law ) ( ( should not ) ( be changed ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Shuger)) (VP (VBZ thinks) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NN law)) (VP (MD should) (RB not) (VP (VB be) (VP (VBN changed))))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: There is no reason to change the law, Shuger's evident wish to do so aside. Hypothesis: Shuger thinks that the law should not be changed.
130,691
130691c
I assure you that you need not let it trouble you.
( I ( ( ( assure you ) ( that ( you ( ( need not ) ( let ( it ( trouble you ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VB assure) (NP (PRP you)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP need) (RB not) (VP (VB let) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBG trouble) (NP (PRP you))))))))) (. .)))
You must worry about it.
( You ( ( must ( worry ( about it ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB worry) (PP (IN about) (NP (PRP it))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
Premise: I assure you that you need not let it trouble you. Hypothesis: You must worry about it.
36,508
36508c
and and because television's brought everything into your living room
( ( and and ) ( because ( television ( 's ( ( brought everything ) ( into ( your ( living room ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (UCP (NP (NNP and)) (CC and) (SBAR (IN because) (S (NP (NN television)) (VP (VBZ 's) (VP (VBN brought) (NP (NN everything)) (PP (IN into) (NP (PRP$ your) (VBG living) (NN room)))))))))
TV offers new experiences but it doesn't bring anything to you in your living room.
( ( ( ( TV ( offers ( new experiences ) ) ) but ) ( it ( ( does n't ) ( ( ( bring anything ) ( to you ) ) ( in ( your ( living room ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (NNP TV)) (VP (VBZ offers) (NP (JJ new) (NNS experiences)))) (CC but) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ does) (RB n't) (VP (VB bring) (NP (NN anything)) (PP (TO to) (NP (PRP you))) (PP (IN in) (NP (PRP$ your) (VBG living) (NN room)))))) (. .)))
telephone
2contradiction
Premise: and and because television's brought everything into your living room Hypothesis: TV offers new experiences but it doesn't bring anything to you in your living room.
140,834
140834e
If the attorney general had ordered up an independent counsel, not only would her job have been secure but the New York Times (and maybe even Sen.
( If ( ( the ( attorney general ) ) ( had ( ( ( ordered ( up ( an ( independent counsel ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( not only ) ( would ( ( her job ) ( have ( ( been secure ) ( but ( ( the ( New ( York Times ) ) ) ( -LRB- ( and ( ( maybe even ) Sen. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (SBAR (IN If) (S (NP (DT the) (NN attorney) (NN general)) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN ordered) (PP (IN up) (NP (DT an) (JJ independent) (NN counsel))) (, ,) (ADVP (ADVP (RB not) (RB only)) (S (MD would) (NP (PRP$ her) (NN job)) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN been) (ADJP (JJ secure)) (PP (IN but) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP New) (NN...
The attorney general did not order an independent counsel.
( ( The ( attorney general ) ) ( ( ( did not ) ( order ( an ( independent counsel ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN attorney) (NN general)) (VP (VBD did) (RB not) (VP (VB order) (NP (DT an) (JJ independent) (NN counsel)))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
Premise: If the attorney general had ordered up an independent counsel, not only would her job have been secure but the New York Times (and maybe even Sen. Hypothesis: The attorney general did not order an independent counsel.
41,421
41421e
but it's i i know yeah same thing yes yes uh-huh
( but ( it ( 's ( ( i i ) ( ( know ( yeah ( same thing ) ) ) ( ( yes yes ) uh-huh ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC but) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (NP (FW i) (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP know) (NP (JJ yeah) (JJ same) (NN thing)) (S (INTJ (UH yes) (UH yes)) (VP (VB uh-huh))))))))))
I know, it's the same thing.
( ( I know ) ( , ( it ( ( 's ( the ( same thing ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP know))) (, ,) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ 's) (NP (DT the) (JJ same) (NN thing))) (. .)))
telephone
0entailment
Premise: but it's i i know yeah same thing yes yes uh-huh Hypothesis: I know, it's the same thing.
10,470
10470c
A reputation for serving the best seafood in town.
( ( ( A reputation ) ( for ( serving ( ( the ( best seafood ) ) ( in town ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (NP (NP (DT A) (NN reputation)) (PP (IN for) (S (VP (VBG serving) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJS best) (NN seafood)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN town))))))) (. .)))
They have a terrible reputation.
( They ( ( have ( a ( terrible reputation ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP They)) (VP (VBP have) (NP (DT a) (JJ terrible) (NN reputation))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
Premise: A reputation for serving the best seafood in town. Hypothesis: They have a terrible reputation.
45,268
45268e
The first principle addresses the acceptance of this premise by senior executive management, and the second ensures that the CIO has the organizational legitimacy to execute his or her role.
( ( ( ( ( ( The ( first principle ) ) ( ( addresses ( ( the acceptance ) ( of ( this premise ) ) ) ) ( by ( senior ( executive management ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( ( the second ) ( ensures ( that ( ( the CIO ) ( has ( the ( organizational ( legitimacy ( to ( execute ( ( ( his or ) her ) role ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (DT The) (JJ first) (NN principle)) (VP (VBZ addresses) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN acceptance)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT this) (NN premise)))) (PP (IN by) (NP (JJ senior) (JJ executive) (NN management))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (DT the) (NN second)) (VP (VBZ ensures) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (DT the) (NNP CIO)) (VP ...
According to the second principle, the CIO must be able to execute his or her role.
( ( According ( to ( the ( second principle ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the CIO ) ( ( must ( be ( able ( to ( execute ( ( ( his or ) her ) role ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (PP (VBG According) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (JJ second) (NN principle)))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NNP CIO)) (VP (MD must) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ able) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB execute) (NP (ADJP (PRP$ his) (CC or) (PRP$ her)) (NN role)))))))) (. .)))
government
0entailment
Premise: The first principle addresses the acceptance of this premise by senior executive management, and the second ensures that the CIO has the organizational legitimacy to execute his or her role. Hypothesis: According to the second principle, the CIO must be able to execute his or her role.
48,019
48019e
Needless to say, one such entry would be unacceptable, and we've adopted strict safeguards to prevent any such problems.
( ( ( ( ( ( Needless ( to say ) ) ( , ( ( one ( such entry ) ) ( would ( be unacceptable ) ) ) ) ) , ) and ) ( we ( 've ( ( adopted ( strict safeguards ) ) ( to ( prevent ( any ( such problems ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (S (ADJP (JJ Needless) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB say)))))) (, ,) (NP (CD one) (JJ such) (NN entry)) (VP (MD would) (VP (VB be) (ADJP (JJ unacceptable))))) (, ,) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP we)) (VP (VBP 've) (VP (VBN adopted) (NP (JJ strict) (NNS safeguards)) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB prevent) (NP (DT any) (JJ such) (NN...
There are safeguards in place.
( There ( ( are ( safeguards ( in place ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBP are) (NP (NP (NNS safeguards)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NN place))))) (. .)))
slate
0entailment
Premise: Needless to say, one such entry would be unacceptable, and we've adopted strict safeguards to prevent any such problems. Hypothesis: There are safeguards in place.
126,957
126957c
In a testament to Las Vegas's relentless pursuit of illusion,its modern visitors never recognize the landmarks that originally offered the city its shot at its natural springs, most of which have long since run empty.
( ( In ( ( a testament ) ( to ( ( ( Las ( Vegas 's ) ) ( relentless pursuit ) ) ( of illusion ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( its ( modern visitors ) ) ( never ( ( recognize ( ( the landmarks ) ( that ( originally ( ( ( offered ( the city ) ) ( its shot ) ) ( at ( ( ( its ( natural springs ) ) , ) ( ( most ( of which ) ) ( ( have ( ...
(ROOT (S (PP (IN In) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN testament)) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (NP (NNP Las) (NNP Vegas) (POS 's)) (JJ relentless) (NN pursuit)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN illusion))))))) (, ,) (NP (PRP$ its) (JJ modern) (NNS visitors)) (ADVP (RB never)) (VP (VBP recognize) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNS landmarks)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (...
Las Vegas is committed to preserving and sharing its rich history with visitors.
( ( Las Vegas ) ( ( is ( committed ( to ( ( ( ( preserving and ) sharing ) ( its ( rich history ) ) ) ( with visitors ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP Las) (NNP Vegas)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (VBN committed) (PP (TO to) (S (VP (VBG preserving) (CC and) (VBG sharing) (NP (PRP$ its) (JJ rich) (NN history)) (PP (IN with) (NP (NNS visitors)))))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
Premise: In a testament to Las Vegas's relentless pursuit of illusion,its modern visitors never recognize the landmarks that originally offered the city its shot at its natural springs, most of which have long since run empty. Hypothesis: Las Vegas is committed to preserving and sharing its rich history with visitors.
86,593
86593c
Here I thought they were just a bunch of losers.
( Here ( I ( ( thought ( they ( ( were just ) ( ( a bunch ) ( of losers ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Here)) (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD thought) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP they)) (VP (VBD were) (ADVP (RB just)) (NP (NP (DT a) (NN bunch)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NNS losers)))))))) (. .)))
I thought you were all winners over here.
( I ( ( thought ( you ( were ( ( all winners ) ( over here ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBD thought) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBD were) (NP (NP (DT all) (NNS winners)) (PP (IN over) (NP (RB here)))))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: Here I thought they were just a bunch of losers. Hypothesis: I thought you were all winners over here.
78,850
78850c
And their festivals, in an area without the usual sorts of urban entertainment, are frequent, colorful, and more spontaneous than in the more densely populated regions of the country.
( And ( ( ( ( ( their festivals ) , ) ( in ( ( an area ) ( without ( ( the ( usual sorts ) ) ( of ( urban entertainment ) ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( ( are ( ( ( ( ( frequent , ) colorful ) , ) and ) ( more spontaneous ) ) ) ( than ( in ( ( the ( ( more ( densely populated ) ) regions ) ) ( of ( the country ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) )
(ROOT (S (CC And) (NP (NP (PRP$ their) (NNS festivals)) (, ,) (PP (IN in) (NP (NP (DT an) (NN area)) (PP (IN without) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJ usual) (NNS sorts)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ urban) (NN entertainment))))))) (, ,)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (ADJP (JJ frequent)) (, ,) (ADJP (JJ colorful)) (, ,) (CC and) (ADJP (RBR more) (J...
Their festivals are infrequent compared to the rest of the country.
( ( Their festivals ) ( ( ( are infrequent ) ( compared ( to ( ( the rest ) ( of ( the country ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ Their) (NNS festivals)) (VP (VBP are) (ADJP (JJ infrequent)) (PP (VBN compared) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN rest)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN country))))))) (. .)))
travel
2contradiction
Premise: And their festivals, in an area without the usual sorts of urban entertainment, are frequent, colorful, and more spontaneous than in the more densely populated regions of the country. Hypothesis: Their festivals are infrequent compared to the rest of the country.
7,827
7827n
The means of maintaining the database and the details that it contained had changed as the number of reported incidents at the university had grown--from 3 or 4 a month in 1993 to between 50 and 60 a month in early 1997--and as the database's value as a management tool became more apparent.
( ( ( The means ) ( of ( ( maintaining ( ( ( the database ) and ) ( the details ) ) ) ( that ( it contained ) ) ) ) ) ( ( had ( changed ( ( ( as ( ( ( the number ) ( of ( ( reported incidents ) ( at ( the university ) ) ) ) ) ( had ( grown ( -- ( ( ( ( from ( ( ( 3 or ) 4 ) ( a month ) ) ) ( in 1993 ) ) ( to ( ( ( ( ( ...
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NN means)) (PP (IN of) (S (VP (VBG maintaining) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN database)) (CC and) (NP (DT the) (NNS details))) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD contained)))))))) (VP (VBD had) (VP (VBN changed) (SBAR (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN number)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (VBN repor...
The university cites people keeping better records as to the reason there were more incidents.
( ( The university ) ( ( cites ( people ( ( ( keeping ( better records ) ) ( as ( to ( the reason ) ) ) ) ( there ( were ( more incidents ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN university)) (VP (VBZ cites) (NP (NP (NNS people)) (VP (VBG keeping) (NP (JJR better) (NNS records)) (PP (IN as) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT the) (NN reason)))) (SBAR (S (NP (EX there)) (VP (VBD were) (NP (JJR more) (NNS incidents)))))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
Premise: The means of maintaining the database and the details that it contained had changed as the number of reported incidents at the university had grown--from 3 or 4 a month in 1993 to between 50 and 60 a month in early 1997--and as the database's value as a management tool became more apparent. Hypothesis: The uni...
50,619
50619n
This extension into the post-discharge period is most relevant for interventions that do not rely completely
( ( ( This extension ) ( into ( the ( post-discharge period ) ) ) ) ( is ( most ( relevant ( for ( interventions ( that ( ( do not ) ( rely completely ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT This) (NN extension)) (PP (IN into) (NP (DT the) (JJ post-discharge) (NN period)))) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RBS most) (JJ relevant) (PP (IN for) (NP (NP (NNS interventions)) (SBAR (WHNP (WDT that)) (S (VP (VBP do) (RB not) (VP (VB rely) (ADVP (RB completely))))))))))))
The movement is valid in most cases.
( ( The movement ) ( ( is ( valid ( in ( most cases ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN movement)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ valid) (PP (IN in) (NP (JJS most) (NNS cases))))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
Premise: This extension into the post-discharge period is most relevant for interventions that do not rely completely Hypothesis: The movement is valid in most cases.
4,942
4942c
This approach is vastly more effective, and cheaper - two-thirds cheaper - than the traditional command-and-control approach.
( ( This approach ) ( ( ( is ( ( ( ( vastly ( more effective ) ) , ) and ) ( cheaper ( - ( ( two-thirds cheaper ) - ) ) ) ) ) ( than ( the ( traditional ( command-and-control approach ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT This) (NN approach)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (ADJP (RB vastly) (RBR more) (JJ effective)) (, ,) (CC and) (ADJP (ADJP (JJR cheaper)) (PRN (: -) (S (NP (NNS two-thirds)) (ADJP (JJR cheaper))) (: -)))) (PP (IN than) (NP (DT the) (JJ traditional) (JJ command-and-control) (NN approach)))) (. .)))
The command and control approach is the cheapest approach.
( ( The ( command ( and ( control approach ) ) ) ) ( ( is ( the ( cheapest approach ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NN command) (CC and) (NN control) (NN approach)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (DT the) (JJS cheapest) (NN approach))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: This approach is vastly more effective, and cheaper - two-thirds cheaper - than the traditional command-and-control approach. Hypothesis: The command and control approach is the cheapest approach.
128,190
128190c
Completeness of information requires this step.
( ( Completeness ( of information ) ) ( ( requires ( this step ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNS Completeness)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NN information)))) (VP (VBZ requires) (NP (DT this) (NN step))) (. .)))
This step is not required for completeness.
( ( This step ) ( ( ( is not ) ( required ( for completeness ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT This) (NN step)) (VP (VBZ is) (RB not) (VP (VBN required) (PP (IN for) (NP (NNS completeness))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: Completeness of information requires this step. Hypothesis: This step is not required for completeness.
135,388
135388c
License-renewal applications don't discuss, though, how many citizens you have conked in the head.
( ( License-renewal applications ) ( ( ( do n't ) ( ( ( ( discuss , ) though ) , ) ( ( ( how many ) citizens ) ( you ( have ( conked ( in ( the head ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NNP License-renewal) (NNS applications)) (VP (VBP do) (RB n't) (VP (VB discuss) (, ,) (ADVP (RB though)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (WHADJP (WRB how) (JJ many)) (NNS citizens)) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN conked) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN head))))))))) (. .)))
This person acts in a moral manner.
( ( This person ) ( ( acts ( in ( a ( moral manner ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT This) (NN person)) (VP (VBZ acts) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT a) (JJ moral) (NN manner)))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: License-renewal applications don't discuss, though, how many citizens you have conked in the head. Hypothesis: This person acts in a moral manner.
33,410
33410n
But it is probably true that the quality of politics in America has suffered from the erosion of public trust in institutions that used to act, to at least some degree, as watchdogs.
( But ( it ( ( ( ( is probably ) true ) ( that ( ( ( the quality ) ( of ( politics ( in America ) ) ) ) ( has ( ( suffered ( from ( ( the erosion ) ( of ( public trust ) ) ) ) ) ( in ( institutions ( that ( used ( to ( ( ( ( act , ) ( to ( ( ( at least ) some ) degree ) ) ) , ) ( as watchdogs ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ...
(ROOT (S (CC But) (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (RB probably)) (ADJP (JJ true)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (NP (DT the) (NN quality)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (NNS politics)) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP America)))))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VBN suffered) (PP (IN from) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN erosion)) (PP (IN of) (NP (JJ public) (NN trust)...
Erosion of public trust in the press has lead us to this point.
( ( Erosion ( of ( ( public trust ) ( in ( the press ) ) ) ) ) ( ( has ( ( lead us ) ( to ( this point ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (NNP Erosion)) (PP (IN of) (NP (NP (JJ public) (NN trust)) (PP (IN in) (NP (DT the) (NN press)))))) (VP (VBZ has) (VP (VB lead) (NP (PRP us)) (PP (TO to) (NP (DT this) (NN point))))) (. .)))
slate
1neutral
Premise: But it is probably true that the quality of politics in America has suffered from the erosion of public trust in institutions that used to act, to at least some degree, as watchdogs. Hypothesis: Erosion of public trust in the press has lead us to this point.
102,671
102671n
The corresponding amount for inbound mail was a negative $31 million.
( ( ( The ( corresponding amount ) ) ( for ( inbound mail ) ) ) ( ( was ( a ( negative ( ( $ 31 ) million ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (JJ corresponding) (NN amount)) (PP (IN for) (NP (JJ inbound) (NN mail)))) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT a) (JJ negative) (QP ($ $) (CD 31) (CD million)))) (. .)))
Inbound mail sent by shippers through the U.S. Post Service due to delays cost companies a corresponding amount of negative $31 million, internal post office procedures are being reviewed to identify ways in the future to avoid delays in delivering Christmas products.
( ( ( Inbound mail ) ( ( ( sent ( by shippers ) ) ( through ( the ( U.S. ( Post Service ) ) ) ) ) ( due ( to ( delays ( ( cost companies ) ( ( a ( corresponding amount ) ) ( of ( negative ( ( $ 31 ) million ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( internal ( post ( office procedures ) ) ) ( ( are ( being ( reviewed ( to ( ( identif...
(ROOT (S (S (NP (JJ Inbound) (NN mail)) (VP (VBD sent) (PP (IN by) (NP (NNS shippers))) (PP (IN through) (NP (DT the) (NNP U.S.) (NNP Post) (NNP Service))) (PP (JJ due) (TO to) (NP (NP (NNS delays)) (VP (VBN cost) (NP (NNS companies)) (NP (NP (DT a) (JJ corresponding) (NN amount)) (PP (IN of) (NP (QP (JJ negative) ($ $...
government
1neutral
Premise: The corresponding amount for inbound mail was a negative $31 million. Hypothesis: Inbound mail sent by shippers through the U.S. Post Service due to delays cost companies a corresponding amount of negative $31 million, internal post office procedures are being reviewed to identify ways in the future to avoid d...
71,847
71847e
It is important that you understand this.
( It ( ( ( is important ) ( that ( you ( understand this ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (JJ important)) (SBAR (IN that) (S (NP (PRP you)) (VP (VBP understand) (NP (DT this)))))) (. .)))
Understanding this is very important.
( ( Understanding this ) ( ( is ( very important ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (S (VP (VBG Understanding) (NP (DT this)))) (VP (VBZ is) (ADJP (RB very) (JJ important))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: It is important that you understand this. Hypothesis: Understanding this is very important.
62,769
62769c
The Commission received comments on the proposed rule from 45 commenters.
( ( The Commission ) ( ( ( received comments ) ( on ( ( the ( proposed rule ) ) ( from ( 45 commenters ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Commission)) (VP (VBD received) (NP (NNS comments)) (PP (IN on) (NP (NP (DT the) (VBN proposed) (NN rule)) (PP (IN from) (NP (CD 45) (NNS commenters)))))) (. .)))
The Commission received no comments concerning the proposed rule.
( ( The Commission ) ( ( received ( ( no comments ) ( concerning ( the ( proposed rule ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (NNP Commission)) (VP (VBD received) (NP (NP (DT no) (NNS comments)) (PP (VBG concerning) (NP (DT the) (VBN proposed) (NN rule))))) (. .)))
government
2contradiction
Premise: The Commission received comments on the proposed rule from 45 commenters. Hypothesis: The Commission received no comments concerning the proposed rule.
61,989
61989c
As far as Lincoln was aware, the plan was this:
( ( As ( far ( as ( Lincoln ( was aware ) ) ) ) ) ( , ( ( the plan ) ( ( was this ) : ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB As) (RB far) (SBAR (IN as) (S (NP (NNP Lincoln)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ aware)))))) (, ,) (NP (DT the) (NN plan)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT this))) (: :)))
There was no plan
( There ( was ( no plan ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBD was) (NP (DT no) (NN plan)))))
fiction
2contradiction
Premise: As far as Lincoln was aware, the plan was this: Hypothesis: There was no plan
52,991
52991c
So what besides that?
( So ( what ( ( besides that ) ? ) ) )
(ROOT (SBARQ (RB So) (WHNP (WP what)) (SQ (VBP besides) (NP (DT that))) (. ?)))
There is nothing else other than that.
( There ( ( ( is nothing ) ( ( else other ) ( than that ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ is) (ADVP (NN nothing)) (NP (NP (RB else) (JJ other)) (PP (IN than) (NP (DT that))))) (. .)))
slate
2contradiction
Premise: So what besides that? Hypothesis: There is nothing else other than that.
122,963
122963n
and i mean it was fantastic and it got good gas mileage but
( and ( i ( mean ( ( ( it ( was fantastic ) ) and ) ( it ( ( got ( good ( gas mileage ) ) ) but ) ) ) ) ) )
(ROOT (FRAG (CC and) (NP (NP (FW i)) (SBAR (S (VP (VBP mean) (SBAR (S (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (JJ fantastic)))) (CC and) (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD got) (NP (JJ good) (NN gas) (NN mileage)) (ADVP (CC but))))))))))))
It ran well, but could have been better.
( It ( ( ( ( ( ran well ) , ) but ) ( could ( have ( been better ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP It)) (VP (VP (VBD ran) (ADVP (RB well))) (, ,) (CC but) (VP (MD could) (VP (VB have) (VP (VBN been) (ADJP (JJR better)))))) (. .)))
telephone
1neutral
Premise: and i mean it was fantastic and it got good gas mileage but Hypothesis: It ran well, but could have been better.
42,408
42408n
Its volume grew from 30.
( ( Its volume ) ( ( grew ( from 30 ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ Its) (NN volume)) (VP (VBD grew) (PP (IN from) (NP (CD 30)))) (. .)))
Its volume expanded to 40.
( ( Its volume ) ( ( expanded ( to 40 ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP$ Its) (NN volume)) (VP (VBD expanded) (PP (TO to) (NP (CD 40)))) (. .)))
government
1neutral
Premise: Its volume grew from 30. Hypothesis: Its volume expanded to 40.
106,469
106469e
sulfur levels, a 4 percent sulfur coal can increase consumption by about one-third.
( ( sulfur levels ) ( , ( ( a ( 4 ( percent ( sulfur coal ) ) ) ) ( ( can ( ( increase consumption ) ( by ( about one-third ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NN sulfur) (NNS levels)) (, ,) (NP (DT a) (CD 4) (NN percent) (NN sulfur) (NN coal)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB increase) (NP (NN consumption)) (PP (IN by) (NP (QP (RB about) (NN one-third)))))) (. .)))
A 4% sulfur coal can increase use by 1/3
( ( A ( ( 4 % ) ( sulfur coal ) ) ) ( can ( ( increase use ) ( by 1/3 ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (DT A) (ADJP (CD 4) (NN %)) (NN sulfur) (NN coal)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB increase) (NP (NN use)) (PP (IN by) (NP (CD 1/3)))))))
government
0entailment
Premise: sulfur levels, a 4 percent sulfur coal can increase consumption by about one-third. Hypothesis: A 4% sulfur coal can increase use by 1/3
5,360
5360n
The somber design incorporates the War Stone and four granite pavilions, one of which contains Celtic and Art Deco illuminated manuscripts by Harry Clarke (who designed the windows in Bewley's) listing the names of those killed.
( ( The ( somber design ) ) ( ( incorporates ( ( ( the ( War ( Stone ( and ( four ( granite pavilions ) ) ) ) ) ) , ) ( ( one ( of which ) ) ( ( contains ( Celtic ( and ( Art ( Deco ( illuminated manuscripts ) ) ) ) ) ) ( by ( ( ( Harry Clarke ) ( -LRB- ( ( who ( ( designed ( the windows ) ) ( in ( Bewley 's ) ) ) ) -R...
(ROOT (S (NP (DT The) (JJ somber) (NN design)) (VP (VBZ incorporates) (NP (NP (DT the) (NNP War) (NNP Stone) (CC and) (CD four) (NN granite) (NNS pavilions)) (, ,) (SBAR (WHNP (CD one) (WHPP (IN of) (WHNP (WDT which)))) (S (VP (VBZ contains) (NP (NNP Celtic) (CC and) (NNP Art) (NNP Deco) (JJ illuminated) (NNS manuscrip...
The designs of this memorial was heavily commented on due to the nature of the event.
( ( ( The designs ) ( of ( this memorial ) ) ) ( ( ( was ( heavily ( commented ( on due ) ) ) ) ( to ( ( the nature ) ( of ( the event ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (NP (DT The) (NNS designs)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT this) (NN memorial)))) (VP (VBD was) (ADJP (RB heavily) (JJ commented) (PP (IN on) (ADJP (JJ due)))) (PP (TO to) (NP (NP (DT the) (NN nature)) (PP (IN of) (NP (DT the) (NN event)))))) (. .)))
travel
1neutral
Premise: The somber design incorporates the War Stone and four granite pavilions, one of which contains Celtic and Art Deco illuminated manuscripts by Harry Clarke (who designed the windows in Bewley's) listing the names of those killed. Hypothesis: The designs of this memorial was heavily commented on due to the natur...
26,821
26821e
You have got them, then?" With magnificent calm Tommy shook his head.
( ( ( ( ( You ( ( ( have ( got them ) ) , ) then ) ) ? ) '' ) ( ( With ( magnificent calm ) ) ( Tommy ( shook ( his head ) ) ) ) ) . )
(ROOT (S (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBP have) (VP (VBN got) (NP (PRP them)))) (, ,) (ADVP (RB then))) (. ?) ('' '') (S (PP (IN With) (NP (JJ magnificent) (NN calm))) (NP (NNP Tommy)) (VP (VBD shook) (NP (PRP$ his) (NN head)))) (. .)))
You have them then? With impressive coolness, Tommy denied.
( You ( ( have ( them ( ( then ? ) ( With ( ( ( impressive coolness ) , ) ( Tommy denied ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (PRP You)) (VP (VBP have) (S (NP (PRP them)) (NP (NP (FRAG (ADVP (RB then)) (. ?))) (PP (IN With) (NP (NP (JJ impressive) (NNS coolness)) (, ,) (NP (NP (NNP Tommy)) (VP (VBN denied)))))))) (. .)))
fiction
0entailment
Premise: You have got them, then?" With magnificent calm Tommy shook his head. Hypothesis: You have them then? With impressive coolness, Tommy denied.
116,132
116132c
Together, we can make the world the better place it was supposed to be.
( Together ( , ( we ( ( can ( ( make ( the world ) ) ( ( the ( better place ) ) ( it ( was ( supposed ( to be ) ) ) ) ) ) ) . ) ) ) )
(ROOT (S (ADVP (RB Together)) (, ,) (NP (PRP we)) (VP (MD can) (VP (VB make) (NP (DT the) (NN world)) (NP (NP (DT the) (JJR better) (NN place)) (SBAR (S (NP (PRP it)) (VP (VBD was) (VP (VBN supposed) (S (VP (TO to) (VP (VB be))))))))))) (. .)))
There is no hope for the world.
( There ( ( is ( ( no hope ) ( for ( the world ) ) ) ) . ) )
(ROOT (S (NP (EX There)) (VP (VBZ is) (NP (NP (DT no) (NN hope)) (PP (IN for) (NP (DT the) (NN world))))) (. .)))
fiction
2contradiction
Premise: Together, we can make the world the better place it was supposed to be. Hypothesis: There is no hope for the world.