this dataset is disgraceful to the open source community and machine learning community
there are artists out there, that have spent possibly hours per image in this dataset, just for you to scrape them and expect us to train models with it.
for credibility of my opinion, i wish to pursue machine learning in the future and have trained my own LLM as a side project.
i do not believe this dataset should be representative of the ML and open source community, you, @captivedreamer , are solely alone on your pride of scraping all of the hard work for such a disgraceful use.
please, delete this dataset.
There are also people trying to defend SA (which shouldn't even have been mentioned then again the topic relates back to permission/consent), and also reply to the criticism with homophobia. It paints a really bad look for the AI community.
Even though I personally do not like generative ai, a waste of money and usually done unethically, I feel AI can genuinely do some good (and has done some good in fields such as science and medicine).
The people replying childishly aren't helping the case or cause.
Edit (comment limit thingy sorry): I think people do so because generative ai supporters tend to defend the evasion of boundaries and claim that "not all consent is valid", comparing ownership of a creation to freedom of speech which isn't really applicable. I don't think it is right to label them with such a strong vile term though.
But plenty do criticize and have criticized with valid reasons, just kind of feels like talking to a wall though.
Also! The person who did that (the other guy) saw the error in his ways and is working with Cara's creator. He saw how unethical it was. (Also please report the guy who desired to SA someone.)
There are also people trying to defend SA (which shouldn't even have been mentioned then again the topic relates back to permission/consent), and also reply to the criticism with homophobia. It paints a really bad look for the AI community.
Even though I personally do not like generative ai, a waste of money and usually done unethically, I feel AI can genuinely do some good (and has done some good in fields such as science and medicine).
The people replying childishly aren't helping the case or cause.
i think this is mostly a loud majority, at least i'd hope so
i personally cannot stand people who compare SA with scraping, and believe their opinions are simply invaluable to discussion
if you want to criticize, please do so with real proof instead of throwing SA accusations around
saying the scraper is this and that is absolutely disgusting and vile, as much as i also dislike the person who scraped cara
edit: also homophobia and all this about defending SA is also very vile
Yeah, this is the type of stuff we don't want in this space. It's weird and uncomfortable when we have peers like this. Either way, this is against TOS and won't be surprised if it's gone sometime soon
for credibility of my opinion, i wish to pursue machine learning in the future and have trained my own LLM as a side project.
Oh man, I wasn't aware we were in front of such an eminence in the field
for credibility of my opinion, i wish to pursue machine learning in the future and have trained my own LLM as a side project.
Oh man, I wasn't aware we were in front of such an eminence in the field
we’re both random internet people but ok i don’t think either one of us is better than each other