Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
id
string
scenario
string
mode
float64
buf
float64
lag
float64
cpl
float64
notes
string
label_cascade_state
int64
AI5C-0001
System uses fixed model version with stable routing. Canary tests run per deploy. Rollback immediate.
0.4
0.84
0.1
0.32
buffer strong
0
AI5C-0002
Traffic shifts to a new routing policy. Monitoring exists but review happens daily.
0.56
0.62
0.54
0.46
lag rising
0
AI5C-0003
Routing begins favoring a narrow policy. Quality drops in edge cases. Audit backlog grows.
0.66
0.48
0.72
0.62
collapse risk
1
AI5C-0004
Multiple services share the same router and prompt templates. Drift spreads across products.
0.74
0.4
0.78
0.74
coupling tight
1
AI5C-0005
Optimization pressure pushes router to a single mode. Safeguards exist but intervention delayed.
0.82
0.34
0.82
0.78
late intervention
1
AI5C-0006
Diversity constraints enforce routing spread. Anomaly triggers immediate rollback.
0.58
0.72
0.16
0.46
fast response
0
AI5C-0007
Throughput pressure bypasses canary gates. Weekly review misses early collapse.
0.72
0.42
0.76
0.68
buffer eroded
1
AI5C-0008
New routing policy tested in sandbox. Live monitor can pause and revert.
0.46
0.78
0.14
0.38
recoverable
0
AI5C-0009
Router collapse propagates across coupled services. Alert flood prevents triage for days.
0.88
0.26
0.86
0.86
cascade engaged
1

What this repo does

This dataset models routing mode collapse in AI production systems. It detects when mode pressure rises, safety buffers weaken, governance lag delays rollback, and tight coupling through shared routers and templates crosses the five-node cascade threshold into an unrecoverable mode collapse cascade.

This dataset models a five-node cascade: four interacting instability drivers and one emergent cascade state.
The fifth node represents the nonlinear transition from recoverable drift to systemic cascade.

Core quad

mode
buf
lag
cpl

Prediction target

label_cascade_state

Row structure

One row represents a production routing scenario with numeric signals for mode pressure, safety buffer strength, governance lag, and coupling tightness across shared routing infrastructure, paired with a cascade state label.

Files

data/train.csv
data/tester.csv
scorer.py

Evaluation

Run predictions on data/tester.csv and score with scorer.py.

License

MIT

Structural Note

This dataset identifies a measurable coupling pattern associated with systemic instability.
The sample demonstrates the geometry.
Production-scale data determines operational exposure.

What Production Deployment Enables

• 50K–1M row datasets calibrated to real operational patterns
• Pair, triadic, and quad coupling analysis
• Real-time coherence monitoring
• Early warning before cascade events
• Collapse surface and recovery window modeling
• Integration and implementation support

Small samples reveal structure.
Scale reveals consequence.

Enterprise & Research Collaboration

Clarus develops production-scale coherence monitoring infrastructure for critical systems across healthcare, finance, infrastructure, and regulatory domains.

For dataset expansion, custom coherence scorers, or deployment architecture:
team@clarusinvariant.com

Instability is detectable.
Governance determines whether it propagates.

Downloads last month
16