Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
id
string
scenario
string
model
float64
buf
float64
lag
float64
cpl
float64
notes
string
label_cascade_state
int64
AI5MV-0001
Single pinned model version per environment. Rollout uses canary and strict routing.
0.42
0.82
0.12
0.38
buffer strong
0
AI5MV-0002
Two versions run during gradual rollout. Routing mostly stable. Review happens daily.
0.56
0.62
0.54
0.5
lag rising
0
AI5MV-0003
Routing drift causes version mixing within one workflow. Outputs conflict. Audit backlog grows.
0.66
0.48
0.72
0.64
conflict forming
1
AI5MV-0004
Multiple services depend on shared embeddings and tools. Version conflict propagates across products.
0.74
0.4
0.78
0.76
coupling tight
1
AI5MV-0005
Version conflict breaks safety assumptions and tool protocols. Rollback delayed. Exposure expands.
0.82
0.34
0.82
0.8
late intervention
1
AI5MV-0006
Contract tests enforce compatibility. Any mismatch triggers immediate reroute and rollback.
0.58
0.72
0.16
0.52
fast response
0
AI5MV-0007
Throughput pressure relaxes contract tests. Weekly review misses early mixing and drift.
0.72
0.42
0.76
0.72
buffer eroded
1
AI5MV-0008
New model version tested in shadow mode with strict routing checks. Pause available.
0.46
0.78
0.14
0.44
recoverable
0
AI5MV-0009
Version conflict across coupled services. Alert flood prevents triage for days. Inconsistent actions persist.
0.88
0.26
0.86
0.88
cascade engaged
1

What this repo does

This dataset models model version conflict cascades during AI rollouts. It detects when version pressure rises, buffers weaken due to mixed routing and missing compatibility checks, governance lag delays rollback, and tight coupling through shared tools and embeddings propagates incompatibilities across products, crossing the five-node cascade threshold into an unrecoverable model version conflict cascade.

This dataset models a five-node cascade: four interacting instability drivers and one emergent cascade state.
The fifth node represents the nonlinear transition from recoverable drift to systemic cascade.

Core quad

model
buf
lag
cpl

Prediction target

label_cascade_state

Row structure

One row represents an AI deployment scenario with numeric signals for model version conflict pressure, safety buffer strength, governance lag, and coupling tightness through shared tooling and cross-service dependencies, paired with a cascade state label.

Files

data/train.csv
data/tester.csv
scorer.py

Evaluation

Run predictions on data/tester.csv and score with scorer.py.

License

MIT

Structural Note

This dataset identifies a measurable coupling pattern associated with systemic instability.
The sample demonstrates the geometry.
Production-scale data determines operational exposure.

What Production Deployment Enables

• 50K–1M row datasets calibrated to real operational patterns
• Pair, triadic, and quad coupling analysis
• Real-time coherence monitoring
• Early warning before cascade events
• Collapse surface and recovery window modeling
• Integration and implementation support

Small samples reveal structure.
Scale reveals consequence.

Enterprise & Research Collaboration

Clarus develops production-scale coherence monitoring infrastructure for critical systems across healthcare, finance, infrastructure, and regulatory domains.

For dataset expansion, custom coherence scorers, or deployment architecture:
team@clarusinvariant.com

Instability is detectable.
Governance determines whether it propagates.

Downloads last month
14