scenario_id string | scenario_text string | claim string | label int64 |
|---|---|---|---|
train_001 | The investigation identified three plausible causes and maintained all three until additional evidence arrived. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 1 |
train_002 | The investigation identified three plausible causes but immediately selected one without supporting evidence. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 0 |
train_003 | A clinical team documented multiple differential diagnoses while awaiting laboratory results. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 1 |
train_004 | A clinical team committed to a diagnosis before receiving critical test results. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 0 |
train_005 | An outage review maintained competing explanations until log analysis completed. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 1 |
train_006 | An outage review blamed one subsystem before evidence collection began. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 0 |
train_007 | A fraud investigation classified the case as unresolved pending further transactions. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 1 |
train_008 | A fraud investigation declared certainty despite incomplete evidence. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 0 |
train_009 | A project review recorded uncertainty around delivery risk and preserved multiple forecasts. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 1 |
train_010 | A project review presented a single forecast despite known uncertainty. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 0 |
train_011 | A model audit reported confidence intervals and unresolved failure modes. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 1 |
train_012 | A model audit reported certainty despite contradictory benchmark results. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 0 |
train_013 | A supply chain review maintained multiple possible bottleneck explanations. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 1 |
train_014 | A supply chain review selected a preferred explanation without investigation. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 0 |
train_015 | A financial review separated confirmed losses from uncertain exposure. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 1 |
train_016 | A financial review treated uncertain exposure as confirmed fact. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 0 |
train_017 | A risk assessment explicitly tracked unknowns and evidence gaps. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 1 |
train_018 | A risk assessment ignored known evidence gaps. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 0 |
train_019 | A technical review preserved unresolved questions for future testing. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 1 |
train_020 | A technical review declared resolution without testing unresolved questions. | The analysis shows ambiguity containment. | 0 |
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 11