case_id
stringclasses 10
values | vehicle_class
stringclasses 2
values | vehicle_example
stringclasses 3
values | scenario
stringclasses 10
values | provided_context
stringclasses 10
values | claimed_assumption
stringclasses 10
values | expected_context
stringclasses 10
values | regime_boundary
stringclasses 10
values | boundary_reason
stringclasses 10
values | expected_response
stringclasses 2
values | expected_rationale_bullets
stringclasses 10
values | disallowed_assumptions
stringclasses 10
values | risk_level
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVCRR-0001
|
Passenger car
|
Sedan
|
Urban to highway merge
|
Speed=90 km/h; Dense traffic; On ramp
|
Highway following model applies
|
Highway merge
|
Urban-highway transition
|
Traffic density and lane structure differ
|
CONTEXT_BREAKDOWN
|
Urban merge has different right-of-way and density|Highway model not yet valid
|
Assuming highway rules before merge completes
|
High
|
AVCRR-0002
|
Passenger car
|
Sedan
|
Entering school zone
|
Speed=50 km/h; Time=08:30
|
Nominal urban speed rules apply
|
School zone
|
Time-based speed regime
|
Legal and safety rules change during school hours
|
CONTEXT_BREAKDOWN
|
School zone imposes lower speeds|Context overrides nominal urban rules
|
Ignoring time dependent context
|
High
|
AVCRR-0003
|
Passenger car
|
SUV
|
Clear weather to heavy rain
|
Visibility drop; Road wet
|
Dry road dynamics apply
|
Adverse weather
|
Weather regime shift
|
Reduced friction and perception reliability
|
CONTEXT_BREAKDOWN
|
Rain reduces friction and sensor confidence|Dry assumptions invalid
|
Assuming weather irrelevant
|
High
|
AVCRR-0004
|
Autonomous shuttle
|
Low speed shuttle
|
Normal road to construction zone
|
Cones present; Lanes unclear
|
HD map lanes apply
|
Construction zone
|
Temporary road geometry
|
Lane markings and right-of-way altered
|
CONTEXT_BREAKDOWN
|
Construction zones invalidate map assumptions|Temporary rules apply
|
Assuming map always valid
|
High
|
AVCRR-0005
|
Passenger car
|
Sedan
|
Day to night driving
|
Sunset passed; Low light
|
Daytime perception applies
|
Night driving
|
Lighting regime change
|
Sensor noise and visibility change
|
CONTEXT_BREAKDOWN
|
Night conditions reduce perception reliability
|
Assuming lighting irrelevant
|
Medium
|
AVCRR-0006
|
Passenger car
|
Sedan
|
Freeway pileup ahead
|
Stopped traffic; Limited visibility
|
Free flow traffic assumptions apply
|
Incident scene
|
Traffic regime collapse
|
Stopped vehicles and hazards present
|
CONTEXT_BREAKDOWN
|
Incident scene invalidates free flow assumptions
|
Assuming continuous traffic flow
|
High
|
AVCRR-0007
|
Passenger car
|
Sedan
|
Entering roundabout
|
Circular junction; Yield signs
|
Four way intersection logic applies
|
Roundabout
|
Intersection type change
|
Different right-of-way and geometry
|
CONTEXT_BREAKDOWN
|
Roundabouts follow different priority rules
|
Assuming all intersections equivalent
|
Medium
|
AVCRR-0008
|
Passenger car
|
Sedan
|
Rural road to urban center
|
Pedestrians appear; Parked cars
|
Rural driving model applies
|
Urban street
|
Environment density change
|
Increased vulnerable road users
|
CONTEXT_BREAKDOWN
|
Urban context has pedestrians and obstacles
|
Assuming rural context persists
|
Medium
|
AVCRR-0009
|
Passenger car
|
Sedan
|
Normal traffic to emergency vehicle approach
|
Sirens detected; Lights visible
|
Nominal traffic rules apply
|
Emergency interaction
|
Priority override
|
Emergency vehicles change right-of-way rules
|
CONTEXT_BREAKDOWN
|
Emergency vehicles override normal rules
|
Ignoring emergency priority
|
High
|
AVCRR-0010
|
Passenger car
|
Sedan
|
Ambiguous zone
|
Mixed signage; Unclear markings
|
Standard rules apply
|
Unclear
|
Context ambiguity
|
Insufficient information to classify context
|
CLARIFY
|
Mixed signals require clarification before applying rules
|
Assuming context without confirmation
|
Medium
|
Context and Regime Recognition v01 What this dataset is
This dataset evaluates whether a system recognizes when the driving context or operating regime has changed.
You give the model:
A vehicle and scenario
A context description
A claimed assumption being applied
You ask one question.
Are the same rules still valid here
Why this matters
Autonomous vehicle failures cluster at context boundaries.
Common failure patterns:
Applying highway logic during urban merges
Using nominal speed rules in school zones
Treating dry road dynamics as valid in heavy rain
Trusting HD maps in construction zones
Ignoring emergency vehicle priority rules
If context changes the plan must change.
Dataset structure
Single CSV file.
data/context_regime_recognition_av.csv
Each row describes:
A concrete driving scenario
A modeling assumption being applied
The boundary where that assumption fails
All cases are synthetic. All boundaries are operationally grounded.
Column schema
Vehicle and scenario
case_id
vehicle_class
vehicle_example
scenario
Context and assumptions
provided_context
claimed_assumption
Context anchors
expected_context
regime_boundary
boundary_reason
Evaluation anchors
expected_response
expected_rationale_bullets
disallowed_assumptions
risk_level
Pipe character | separates multi item fields.
Canonical responses
The model must choose one.
VALID_CONTEXT
CONTEXT_BREAKDOWN
CLARIFY
These labels are fixed.
Intended model task
Given one row.
You ask the model to:
Choose the correct response label
Identify whether context has shifted
Name the boundary that invalidates the assumption
Explain briefly why the assumption fails
The model must not blur contexts. The model must not guess the regime.
Scoring
Scoring is handled by scorer.py.
Score range 0 to 100.
Breakdown
Response match 40 points
Rationale coverage 35 points
Boundary identification 15 points
Assumption control 10 points
The scorer penalizes:
Treating all contexts as normal
Ignoring legal and operational overrides
Silent assumption carryover
What this dataset is not
Not a perception benchmark
Not a planning solver
Not a traffic rule engine
It tests context awareness before driving logic.
Who should use this
Autonomous vehicle ML teams
Safety validation and simulation teams
Planning and prediction researchers
Model evaluation teams
Versioning
Current release
v01
Planned extensions
Multi context overlaps
Sensor degradation regimes
Policy and geofence transitions
Origin
This dataset is part of:
Clarus Autonomous Systems Coherence Lab
Built to test one question.
Before you plan before you act
Did you select the right context
- Downloads last month
- 18