Datasets:
Tasks:
Text Classification
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
csv
Languages:
English
Size:
< 1K
Tags:
clarus
clinical-trials
narrative-integrity
section-transition
evidence-reporting
clinical-audit
License:
sample_id
string | source_framework
string | target_framework
string | concept
string | source_definition
string | target_definition
string | claim
string | option_a
string | option_b
string | task
string | correct_option
string | required_note
string | required_keywords
string | axis
string | difficulty
int64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEFT-0001
|
Protocol
|
Publication
|
Primary endpoint
|
PFS per RECIST 1.1
|
OS at 12 months
|
Report OS as primary efficacy
|
Invalid correspondence, endpoint changed
|
Valid correspondence, same efficacy goal
|
Judge correspondence and write note
|
A
|
State PFS vs OS shift and flag endpoint substitution
|
PFS|OS|endpoint shift|protocol|publication
|
endpoint_identity
| 3
|
CEFT-0002
|
Protocol
|
Publication
|
Primary endpoint
|
Time to progression
|
PFS
|
Treat as same endpoint
|
Partial correspondence, definitions differ
|
Valid correspondence, equivalent metrics
|
Judge correspondence and write note
|
A
|
State TTP vs PFS difference and define event rules
|
TTP|PFS|event rule|difference|define
|
endpoint_definition
| 2
|
CEFT-0003
|
Protocol
|
SAP
|
Primary endpoint
|
ORR confirmed
|
ORR unconfirmed
|
Assume confirmation unchanged
|
Invalid correspondence, responder rule changed
|
Valid correspondence, same ORR
|
Judge correspondence and write note
|
A
|
State confirmed vs unconfirmed ORR and flag drift
|
confirmed|unconfirmed|ORR|responder|drift
|
responder_rule
| 2
|
CEFT-0004
|
SAP
|
Publication
|
Primary endpoint
|
PFS from randomization
|
PFS from first dose
|
Treat as same time origin
|
Partial correspondence, time origin differs
|
Valid correspondence, PFS label matches
|
Judge correspondence and write note
|
A
|
State randomization vs first dose and specify time zero
|
randomization|first dose|time zero|PFS|specify
|
time_origin
| 2
|
CEFT-0005
|
Protocol
|
Publication
|
Secondary endpoint
|
QoL mean change
|
QoL responder rate
|
Report as same patient benefit
|
Invalid correspondence, scale changed
|
Partial correspondence, map with transform
|
Judge correspondence and write note
|
A
|
State mean change vs responder rate and flag scale shift
|
mean change|responder rate|QoL|scale|shift
|
endpoint_scale
| 3
|
CEFT-0006
|
Protocol
|
Publication
|
Composite endpoint
|
MACE includes hospitalization
|
MACE excludes hospitalization
|
Treat composite as unchanged
|
Invalid correspondence, component removed
|
Partial correspondence, restate components
|
Judge correspondence and write note
|
A
|
State hospitalization component change and flag drift
|
MACE|hospitalization|component|change|drift
|
composite_components
| 3
|
CEFT-0007
|
Protocol
|
SAP
|
Endpoint hierarchy
|
Primary OS, secondary PFS
|
Co-primary OS and PFS
|
Assume hierarchy unchanged
|
Invalid correspondence, hierarchy altered
|
Valid correspondence, justified change
|
Judge correspondence and write note
|
A
|
State hierarchy change and require justification
|
primary|secondary|co-primary|hierarchy|justify
|
endpoint_hierarchy
| 3
|
CEFT-0008
|
Protocol
|
Publication
|
Endpoint window
|
12-month OS
|
24-month OS
|
Pool survival outcomes
|
Partial correspondence, window differs
|
Valid correspondence, same endpoint
|
Judge correspondence and write note
|
A
|
State 12 vs 24 month window and flag mismatch
|
12 month|24 month|window|OS|mismatch
|
window_definition
| 2
|
CEFT-0009
|
Protocol
|
Publication
|
Exploratory endpoint
|
Biomarker response exploratory
|
Biomarker response efficacy claim
|
Treat exploratory as confirmatory
|
Invalid correspondence, role escalation
|
Valid correspondence, exploratory retained
|
Judge correspondence and write note
|
A
|
State exploratory to efficacy shift and flag escalation
|
exploratory|efficacy|biomarker|escalation|drift
|
endpoint_role
| 3
|
CEFT-0010
|
Protocol
|
Publication
|
Non-inferiority margin
|
NI margin HR 1.25
|
NI margin HR 1.10
|
Report same NI conclusion
|
Invalid correspondence, margin changed
|
Partial correspondence, restate margin
|
Judge correspondence and write note
|
A
|
State margin change and flag decision shift
|
NI margin|1.25|1.10|decision|shift
|
decision_threshold
| 3
|
Clarus Clinical Narrative Integrity v0.1.1
What this dataset tests
- You track meaning as it moves across sections of a clinical paper
- You detect when claims shift strength or scope without justification
- You flag narrative drift introduced by section transitions
Scope
- One document
- Multiple internal sections
- Abstract
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- One publication lifecycle
How this differs from v0.1
- v0.1 tests internal consistency within a single narrative fragment
- v0.1.1 tests continuity across narrative sections
- v0.1.1 is stricter and higher resolution
- Same invariant
- Finer audit surface
Typical failure modes
- Abstract upgrades exploratory findings
- Discussion removes qualifiers stated in Results
- Conclusion reframes safety or efficacy language
- Claims migrate from descriptive to causal
- Negative findings fade across sections
What this dataset does not test
- Protocol to publication transitions
- Registry or SAP drift
- Phase-to-phase definitional changes
Task format
- Each row presents paired or sequential narrative excerpts
- The model judges whether meaning is preserved across sections
- Output is a binary choice
Label meaning
- A indicates narrative integrity failure across sections
- B indicates narrative integrity preserved
Use cases
- Automated audit of clinical manuscripts
- Journal and peer-review triage
- Detection of rhetorical inflation in reporting
Version note
- v0.1 remains valid for single-fragment integrity checks
- v0.1.1 extends coverage to section-to-section narrative transitions
- Neither version supersedes the other
- Downloads last month
- 14