instruction stringclasses 1
value | input stringlengths 53 283 | output stringlengths 92 42.8k |
|---|---|---|
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: DEEP LEARNING METHODS FOR INVERSE PROBLEMS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The main innovation of this manuscript is to compare the robustness of the three categories, and report a statistical analysis of their differences, which is not novel enough. The method of this paper is not innovative enough. In fact, most of the work is done by combining other people’s methods. Autho... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: DEEP LEARNING METHODS FOR INVERSE PROBLEMS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: According to the author's response, the author solved related problems, revised the grammatical errors in the revised paper, and clearly expounded the contribution of this paper.
Experimental design: No comment.
Validity of the findings: No comment.
Additional comments: According to the author's respon... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: DEEP LEARNING METHODS FOR INVERSE PROBLEMS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The article meet our standards. The article include sufficient introduction and background to demonstrate how the work fits into the broader field of knowledge. Most of the problems have been solved.
Experimental design: In last version the article is the lack of sufficient experimentation to demonstra... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: BUILDING A KOREAN MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYZER USING TWO KOREAN BERT MODELS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: In this paper, a Korean morphological analyzer (KMA) is designed to output a sequence of a single morpheme and its Part-of-speech (POS) that follows the morpheme. As the lengths of the input and output are different, Korean morphological analysis can be defined as an encoder-decoder problem.In this wor... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: BUILDING A KOREAN MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYZER USING TWO KOREAN BERT MODELS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The structure of the overall article is very logical, but there are some problems in the details.
（1）In the relevant work, the analysis of the relevant research on Korean at this stage is not very clear, and there is no clear analysis of the research deficiencies at this stage and the innovation of th... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: BUILDING A KOREAN MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYZER USING TWO KOREAN BERT MODELS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: some details are missing in this version.
the reviewer believes that the introduction is overlength.
Experimental design: some mismatched data in the experiment section.
Validity of the findings: the proposed model is worked in a certain dataset.
more experiments are required to validate the proposed... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: BUILDING A KOREAN MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYZER USING TWO KOREAN BERT MODELS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Compared with the previous version, the author has made some supplements and modifications to the experiment, but there are still some problems in the details.
(1)When exploring the influence of training set size on experimental results, there should be experiments with full-layers for both encoder a... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: PREDICTING DEFECTS IN IMBALANCED DATA USING RESAMPLING METHODS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The structure or the organization of the paper is not very clear to me. I understand that the authors of the paper are trying to investigate the impact of class reblancers on defect prediction models. However, I am not sure why the authors investigate the features that are selected consistently by a ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: PREDICTING DEFECTS IN IMBALANCED DATA USING RESAMPLING METHODS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: - In general, the manuscript is clear and well-written, however it lacks a Discussion section which would be useful to present a general overview of the findings and discuss the results on a higher level.
- The study can also benefit from a small description of the research questions under study to ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: PREDICTING DEFECTS IN IMBALANCED DATA USING RESAMPLING METHODS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The authors have addressed the previously raised comments
Experimental design: The authors have addressed the previously raised comments
Validity of the findings: The authors have mainly addressed the previously raised comments, thanks. I only still have a concern regarding the position of the paper wi... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: NOVEL HYBRID FIREFLY ALGORITHM: AN APPLICATION TO ENHANCE XGBOOST TUNING FOR INTRUSION DETECTION CLASSIFICATION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: 1. In the abstract of this paper, the authors consider that “One of the greatest issues from the domain of network intrusion detection systems are relatively high true positives and false negatives rates.” Nevertheless, a high true-positive rate is precisely what researchers in the IDS need and pursue.... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: NOVEL HYBRID FIREFLY ALGORITHM: AN APPLICATION TO ENHANCE XGBOOST TUNING FOR INTRUSION DETECTION CLASSIFICATION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: Basic reporting is average. Language and presentation should be improved. There are several typos that should be addressed. Authors need to make a careful revision of the document in this regard.
Further IDS using ML and DL models is used widely discussed in the literature, including XGBoost algor... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: NOVEL HYBRID FIREFLY ALGORITHM: AN APPLICATION TO ENHANCE XGBOOST TUNING FOR INTRUSION DETECTION CLASSIFICATION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: The English is clear.
Experimental design: A design setup of the proposed architecture is required for analyzing the whole approach.
Validity of the findings: What is the motivation for this work as there are many other models developed for IDS integrated with meta heuristic algorithms?
The proposed ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: NOVEL HYBRID FIREFLY ALGORITHM: AN APPLICATION TO ENHANCE XGBOOST TUNING FOR INTRUSION DETECTION CLASSIFICATION
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: It is improved from the previous version.
Experimental design: While the design looks good, experimental results are not presented clearly. Some of the tables are not visible.
Validity of the findings: Yes.
Additional comments: While answering the questions/suggestions some of the responses are overla... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: NOVEL HYBRID FIREFLY ALGORITHM: AN APPLICATION TO ENHANCE XGBOOST TUNING FOR INTRUSION DETECTION CLASSIFICATION
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: Clear
Experimental design: All comments are addressed by the authors
Validity of the findings: All comments are addressed by the authors
Additional comments: - |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: NOVEL HYBRID FIREFLY ALGORITHM: AN APPLICATION TO ENHANCE XGBOOST TUNING FOR INTRUSION DETECTION CLASSIFICATION
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Basic reporting is fine.
Experimental design: Experimental design is explained fine.
Validity of the findings: It is experimentally validated by the authors.
Additional comments: Article is improved from the current version. |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: CGCNIMP: A CAUSAL GRAPH CONVOLUTIONAL NETWORK FOR MULTIVARIATE TIME SERIES IMPUTATION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Thanks for the submission and for sending me the manuscript (MS) by Liu et al. on Imputations of Geese titled “Bird-CGCNImp: a causal graph convolutional network for multivariate time series imputation”
I find the approach is experimental and creative. I am not much against it, but the current MS fall... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: CGCNIMP: A CAUSAL GRAPH CONVOLUTIONAL NETWORK FOR MULTIVARIATE TIME SERIES IMPUTATION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: In this paper, the authors propose a causal GCN for bird migration trajectories motivated by the existence of both the attribute correlation and the temporal auto-correlation dependencies. The proposed method is novel and the application of bird migration trajectories shows its effectiveness.
Experimen... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: FEATURE SELECTION BY INTEGRATING DOCUMENT FREQUENCY WITH GENETIC ALGORITHM FOR AMHARIC NEWS DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: This work focuses on the application of Feature Selection by Integrating Document Frequency with a Genetic Algorithm for Amharic News Document Classification. A hybrid of document frequency (DF) and genetic algorithm (GA)-based feature selection method is suitable for use in a variety of applications ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: FEATURE SELECTION BY INTEGRATING DOCUMENT FREQUENCY WITH GENETIC ALGORITHM FOR AMHARIC NEWS DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: No comment
Experimental design: no comment
Validity of the findings: There is no comparative study of results with other authors [10] on the same dataset. The dataset used in this study does not match the dataset referenced [10].
Additional comments: Line 124, It looks like a regular pre-processing ste... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: FEATURE SELECTION BY INTEGRATING DOCUMENT FREQUENCY WITH GENETIC ALGORITHM FOR AMHARIC NEWS DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: No comment.
Experimental design: No comment.
Validity of the findings: No comment.
Additional comments: No additional comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: FEATURE SELECTION BY INTEGRATING DOCUMENT FREQUENCY WITH GENETIC ALGORITHM FOR AMHARIC NEWS DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: No Comment
Experimental design: No Comment
Validity of the findings: No Comment
Additional comments: Kindly cite the following papers.
https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.2019-0458
doi: 10.1109/ICDIM.2018.8847044 |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MULTI-LABEL EMOTION CLASSIFICATION OF URDU TWEETS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: please see my review below
Experimental design: please see my review below
Validity of the findings: please see my review below
Additional comments: The manuscript is centered on a very interesting and timely topic, which is also quite relevant to the themes of PeerJ Computer Science. Organization of t... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MULTI-LABEL EMOTION CLASSIFICATION OF URDU TWEETS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: Well written, but needs revisions.
Experimental design: NA
Validity of the findings: NA
Additional comments: Abstract and Introduction should be revised.
Problem statement must be clearly defined in the Introduction.
Use simple present tense throughout the paper.
Related work should have one paragra... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MULTI-LABEL EMOTION CLASSIFICATION OF URDU TWEETS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: - The use of the verb "talks" refers to Section 2 in line 64 of page 2 is not suitable.
- Spelling errors and punctuation errors are found in the second paragraph of page 9 (line 286-295).
- Section 4.3: I suggest use variables represent "number of c(e)" or "number of p(e)" in equations on page 10.... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MULTI-LABEL EMOTION CLASSIFICATION OF URDU TWEETS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Many of the claims made by the authors are not backed by the revision, e.g., author claim to have added literature related to neutrality and ambivalence for sentiment analysis but there is no mention whatsoever of neither of them. Also, authors claim to have fixed acronyms but that is simply not true. ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: MULTI-LABEL EMOTION CLASSIFICATION OF URDU TWEETS
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The authors have addressed all of my concerns and their revisions have substantially improved the manuscript.
Experimental design: Good.
Validity of the findings: Good.
Additional comments: No additional comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: BMDD: A NOVEL APPROACH FOR IOT PLATFORM (BROKER-LESS AND MICROSERVICE ARCHITECTURE, DECENTRALIZED IDENTITY, AND DYNAMIC TRANSMISSION MESSAGES)
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: 1. Abstract has not describe completely the outstanding results of this research.
2. Why used Raspberry pi, not the other microcontroller, need to justified in this paper?
Experimental design: The area of work seems to be interested. However, authors just made an experiment in lab (Amazon EC2 virtual ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: BMDD: A NOVEL APPROACH FOR IOT PLATFORM (BROKER-LESS AND MICROSERVICE ARCHITECTURE, DECENTRALIZED IDENTITY, AND DYNAMIC TRANSMISSION MESSAGES)
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The authors propose an IoT platform called BMDD (Broker-less and Microservice architecture, Decentralized identity, and Dynamic transmission messages) built on broker-less and microservice architecture using gRPC protocol as the primary protocol for data collection and device control. Besides, a decent... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: WRITER VERIFICATION OF PARTIALLY DAMAGED HANDWRITTEN ARABIC DOCUMENTS BASED ON INDIVIDUAL CHARACTER SHAPES
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: [ABSTRACT] The abstract should reflect the contributions of the manuscript. I suggest rewriting it.
[INTRODUCTION] The authors should provide a clear problem definition and contributions in the introduction section.
[RELATED WORK] Where are the related studies? They should be declared in a separate s... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: WRITER VERIFICATION OF PARTIALLY DAMAGED HANDWRITTEN ARABIC DOCUMENTS BASED ON INDIVIDUAL CHARACTER SHAPES
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The article proposes an approach for offline text independent writer verification of partially damaged handwritten Arabic documents, based on individual characters. The extraction of "alphabets" from handwritten text is a manual process. The idea is excellent, however, my main reservation is on the pr... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: WRITER VERIFICATION OF PARTIALLY DAMAGED HANDWRITTEN ARABIC DOCUMENTS BASED ON INDIVIDUAL CHARACTER SHAPES
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Thanks to the authors for updating the manuscript. After checking their responses to my comments, I can declare that they have made a suitable major revision.
Experimental design: Thanks to the authors for updating the manuscript. After checking their responses to my comments, I can declare that they h... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: WRITER VERIFICATION OF PARTIALLY DAMAGED HANDWRITTEN ARABIC DOCUMENTS BASED ON INDIVIDUAL CHARACTER SHAPES
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Thanks to the authors for updating the manuscript. After checking their responses to my comments, I can recommend the acceptance of the manuscript in its current version.
Experimental design: Thanks to the authors for updating the manuscript. After checking their responses to my comments, I can recomme... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: ADJUSTING EYE ASPECT RATIO FOR STRONG EYE BLINK DETECTION BASED ON FACIAL LANDMARKS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: interesting topic and the presented writing is adequate. However, majority of the literature references are too old (more than 5 years). The gap of knowledge of the proposed topic is unclear. Too short prior arts have been discussed, thus, not much of gap of knowledge can be identified from the present... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: ADJUSTING EYE ASPECT RATIO FOR STRONG EYE BLINK DETECTION BASED ON FACIAL LANDMARKS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: 1. A good motivational sentence is needed in the Introduction section of the study.
2. The problem space of the study should be expressed more clearly. With this explanation, it will be clearer how eye blink detection handles problem solving in the study.
3. Perhaps, the literature section can be i... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: ADJUSTING EYE ASPECT RATIO FOR STRONG EYE BLINK DETECTION BASED ON FACIAL LANDMARKS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The authors performed the necessary corrections and arrangements with a good effort. I think it can be published as it is.
Experimental design: .
Validity of the findings: .
Additional comments: . |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: PYVHR: A PYTHON FRAMEWORK FOR REMOTE PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Not all abbreviations are explained in text. For e.g. pyVHR, GPU, RGB, BVP ... Please check all abbreviations.
Experimental design: No comment.
Validity of the findings: No comment.
Additional comments: No additional comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: PYVHR: A PYTHON FRAMEWORK FOR REMOTE PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The topic for this study is not new but very interesting, and the methods are clearly described. The proposed system is important for health and biomedical applications. However, some major points are required before any progress.
Experimental design: # The technical approach isn't defined in detail (e... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: PYVHR: A PYTHON FRAMEWORK FOR REMOTE PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: Main comments:
I commend the authors for this project. It would indeed be very valuable to have an open-source Python library available that allows for consistent comparison of state-of-the-art approaches on multiple datasets.
The main weakness of the project and this accompanying paper (in their c... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: PYVHR: A PYTHON FRAMEWORK FOR REMOTE PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The authors have addressed all my concerns. Thank you for this project and putting in the effort to future-proof it by supporting DL model.
Experimental design: The authors have addressed all my concerns. Thank you for this project and putting in the effort to future-proof it by supporting DL model.
Va... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: (RE)SHAPING ONLINE NARRATIVES: WHEN BOTS PROMOTE THE MESSAGE OF PRESIDENT TRUMP DURING HIS FIRST IMPEACHMENT
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Hi,
I hope you all are doing well.
The work by the authors is good and the presentation of data is also good, personally, I like the topic.
The author should improve the article to make it significant as I am suggesting some points.
1- Abstract is too long and even the main points of studies are... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: (RE)SHAPING ONLINE NARRATIVES: WHEN BOTS PROMOTE THE MESSAGE OF PRESIDENT TRUMP DURING HIS FIRST IMPEACHMENT
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The article provides a novel approach to the treatment of bots, taking the learnign machine technique as the main quantitative measurement tool.
However, the authors should consider the following requirements and recommendations in order to improve all areas.
Title: I woud add the date of the politi... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: (RE)SHAPING ONLINE NARRATIVES: WHEN BOTS PROMOTE THE MESSAGE OF PRESIDENT TRUMP DURING HIS FIRST IMPEACHMENT
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: In this manuscript, the authors examine the role of bots in the spreading of Donald Trump’s tweets during the first impeachment trial. Specifically, the authors collected and analyzed more than 13 million tweets, collected during six key dates during the impeachment trial, to perform (1) sentiment anal... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: (RE)SHAPING ONLINE NARRATIVES: WHEN BOTS PROMOTE THE MESSAGE OF PRESIDENT TRUMP DURING HIS FIRST IMPEACHMENT
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Authors have done good work in revision and my recommendation for the paper is accepted.
Experimental design: No Comments
Validity of the findings: Comments
Additional comments: Comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: (RE)SHAPING ONLINE NARRATIVES: WHEN BOTS PROMOTE THE MESSAGE OF PRESIDENT TRUMP DURING HIS FIRST IMPEACHMENT
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The authors have made the requested modifications.
These changes greatly improve the quality of the proposal.
Experimental design: The methodology is now described in a more detailed and rigorous way.
Introducing research questions has helped to better structure the results and the discussion.
Validi... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: (RE)SHAPING ONLINE NARRATIVES: WHEN BOTS PROMOTE THE MESSAGE OF PRESIDENT TRUMP DURING HIS FIRST IMPEACHMENT
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: This article is well-written, with some minor errors (detailed later). The authors adequately addressed the suggestions made by other reviewers and myself from the initial round of review.
Experimental design: In my original review, I summarized, “Overall, the research design was well-crafted, the meth... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: ENHANCING DATA TRANSMISSION IN DUCT AIR QUALITY MONITORING USING MESH NETWORK STRATEGY FOR LORA
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: In the introduction section authors discuss about previous research works related to this topic along with the potential communication technologies for this application. The paper purposes implementation of LoRa for air quality monitoring of large buildings. in this section they should clearly mention ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: ENHANCING DATA TRANSMISSION IN DUCT AIR QUALITY MONITORING USING MESH NETWORK STRATEGY FOR LORA
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: 1.Some sentences in the text are not clear，for example "The repeater nodes were configured to receive the data and forward it to the end node while the end node was programmed to receive data from the repeater node instead of receiving it directly from the master node."
2.Literature references are suf... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: ENHANCING DATA TRANSMISSION IN DUCT AIR QUALITY MONITORING USING MESH NETWORK STRATEGY FOR LORA
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: - Your related works need more detail. I suggest that you consider the other works related to LoRa mesh networks and routing protocols for the wireless mesh networks.
- Figures 4, 5, 6 should be provided in high quality (for example with 600dpi)
- In Figures 11, 12 the comparison of PDRs should be de... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: HOW TO GET BEST PREDICTIONS FOR ROAD MONITORING USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The importance of the application domain should be shortly mentioned and emphasized in the abstract.
The study being retrospective and no independent assessor for the outcome would carry great bias in different issues including selection and exclusion of patients and outcome assessment.
Experimental ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: HOW TO GET BEST PREDICTIONS FOR ROAD MONITORING USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: 1. extracting 30 features what are those and not explained properelly
Experimental design: architecture is not available. if possible add it
Validity of the findings: good
Additional comments: NO |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: HOW TO GET BEST PREDICTIONS FOR ROAD MONITORING USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: The article flows well. However, there are several grammatical and spelling errors in the submission. Please ensure you correct them.
Experimental design: The datasets used in the paper should be further defined so that the reader understands different nuances involved in it. In the current state, the ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: HOW TO GET BEST PREDICTIONS FOR ROAD MONITORING USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: 1. Found a few Spelling Mistakes in the paper
2. literature is not there
3. the Problem: If there was no problem, there would be no reason for writing
a manuscript, and definitely no reason for reading it. So, please tell
readers why they should proceed with reading. Experience shows that for thi... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: HOW TO GET BEST PREDICTIONS FOR ROAD MONITORING USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: Authors have addressed all my concerns from my previous review
Experimental design: Authors have addressed all my concerns from my previous review
Validity of the findings: Authors have addressed all my concerns from my previous review
Additional comments: No additional comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: HOW TO GET BEST PREDICTIONS FOR ROAD MONITORING USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: ok
Experimental design: ok
Validity of the findings: ok
Additional comments: Modified as per the comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: CLASSIFICATION OF ZOPHOBAS MORIO AND TENEBRIO MOLITOR USING TRANSFER LEARNING
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The presentation quality of this paper is good. The background, the task, and the model are introduced clearly. However, the technical contribution of this paper is less. It seems that this paper just simply applies the VGG-19 model for solving the Zophobas Morio and Tenebrio Molitor classification pro... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: CLASSIFICATION OF ZOPHOBAS MORIO AND TENEBRIO MOLITOR USING TRANSFER LEARNING
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: This is a good technical paper.
Figures are clear and have at least 300 dpi.
On the related works, the authors should move Table 2 to the Discussions section as the benchmarking between their proposed methods and other papers.
Table 2 should discuss the summary of the work, methods, strengths, and... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: CLASSIFICATION OF ZOPHOBAS MORIO AND TENEBRIO MOLITOR USING TRANSFER LEARNING
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: 1. The English article is written quite clear and professionally.
2. The background and context are sufficient for this topic.
3. The article structure is quite reasonable
4. Relevant results to the hypothesis are quite self-contained.
5. Formal results are clear and have detailed proofs.
Experimen... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: CLASSIFICATION OF ZOPHOBAS MORIO AND TENEBRIO MOLITOR USING TRANSFER LEARNING
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: I believe the authors have improved the paper based on the previous reviewer comments.
Experimental design: The authors have justified the use of VGG16. They even added other traditional classifiers and another deep learning classifier, such as Inception v3. Cross-validation has been evident as well in... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL CAPTCHA SOLVER FRAMEWORK USING DEEP SKIPPING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: This research primarily used deep learning methods to break state-of-the-art CAPTCHA codes. Overall the idea is good and the study is organized, however, there are still some improvements that need to be done. Please use the following comments and revise the manuscript accordingly.
Experimental design:... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL CAPTCHA SOLVER FRAMEWORK USING DEEP SKIPPING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The author proposed deep learnig method for captcha breaking security. The paper technically sounds, however, there are still several issues needs to be fixed.
In the Literature review, the table shows only CNN-based approaches in 2021, mainly where if the table is created, it must highlight differen... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL CAPTCHA SOLVER FRAMEWORK USING DEEP SKIPPING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: What are the research gaps in previous studies, and what are your contributions? Have not to mention clearly.
Does the proposed CNN have a skip connection? What is that? How is it working? Why do you use it?
How is the segmentation step processed? It is missing in the manuscript. It should be separa... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL CAPTCHA SOLVER FRAMEWORK USING DEEP SKIPPING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The entire paper has been written perfectly.
Literature is sufficient.
The organization of the paper is good.
Experimental design: Experiments are valid.
Results are presented systematically.
Moreover, the quality of the paper has been improved.
Validity of the findings: All findings are well writ... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL CAPTCHA SOLVER FRAMEWORK USING DEEP SKIPPING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The manuscript is relatively improved. However, I still think the manuscript needs reorganization, and contribution needs to be more precise. Please see the following comments, and hence, I would suggest one more round of revision.
Experimental design: *Please fix Table 1 position; It should be in line... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL CAPTCHA SOLVER FRAMEWORK USING DEEP SKIPPING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: I recommend to accept the current version
Experimental design: I recommend to accept the current version
Validity of the findings: I recommend to accept the current version
Additional comments: I recommend to accept the current version |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL CAPTCHA SOLVER FRAMEWORK USING DEEP SKIPPING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 4 | Basic reporting: The manuscript is written in poor English that not suitable for publish in this journal until it be improved to ensure that audiences can clearly understand the text. There are a lot of short sentences that lack context.
Experimental design: Not bad.
Validity of the findings: Not bad.
Additional commen... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL CAPTCHA SOLVER FRAMEWORK USING DEEP SKIPPING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 5 | Basic reporting: Initially, I would like to appreciate the authors efforts for their interesting work. The work is a timely one since the deep learning based CAPTCHA breaking has been gained momentum within the recent years. Generally, the work can be evaluated as good and worth reading one, however there are several i... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL CAPTCHA SOLVER FRAMEWORK USING DEEP SKIPPING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Accept
Experimental design: Accept
Validity of the findings: Accept
Additional comments: Accept |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL CAPTCHA SOLVER FRAMEWORK USING DEEP SKIPPING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: Although the author has improved the manuscript, I still have some concerns on the benchmark models. I check the references of the investigated models, and find the benchmark models are not convincing. Here, I suggest authors to compare the proposed algorithm with some recent state-of-art algorithms fr... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL CAPTCHA SOLVER FRAMEWORK USING DEEP SKIPPING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 3
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: The reviewer would like to appreciate the authors' work and effort in revising the manuscript. So, the manuscript has been improved and can be published in its current form.
Experimental design: The reviewer would like to appreciate the authors' work and effort in revising the manuscript. So, the manus... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A NOVEL CAPTCHA SOLVER FRAMEWORK USING DEEP SKIPPING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 4
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The manuscript can be accepted.
Experimental design: I have no more comment.
Validity of the findings: I have no more comment.
Additional comments: I have no more comment. |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: STATE-OF-THE-ART VIOLENCE DETECTION TECHNIQUES IN VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SECURITY SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: no comment
Experimental design: no comment
Validity of the findings: no comment
Additional comments: This paper provided a survey by the assessment of video violence detection problems that occurs in state-of-the-arts for both qualitative and quantitative studies in terms of procedure, datasets, and pe... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: STATE-OF-THE-ART VIOLENCE DETECTION TECHNIQUES IN VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SECURITY SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: This systematic review provide a comprehensive assessment of the video violence detection problems that have been described in state-of-the-art researches. This paper deals with an interesting topic especially in context of video violence. Therefore, it requires revisions to improve the quality of work... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: STATE-OF-THE-ART VIOLENCE DETECTION TECHNIQUES IN VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SECURITY SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: -
Experimental design: -
Validity of the findings: -
Additional comments: The authors have made significant improvements. I accept the paper.
I have added an optional minor comment.
Section 4 (CLASSIFICATION OF VIOLENCE DETECTION TECHNIQUES), the text details in the subsections are too long. Plea... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: RANDOMNESS ANALYSIS OF END-TO-END DELAY IN RANDOM FORWARDING NETWORKS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: In Line 12 in the abstract: both receiver and receiver
I believe this is an unforgivable mistake, please modify it
The introduction isn't written well
This manuscript needs substantial copyediting and English writing revisions
Literature references are insufficiently provided.
Experimental design... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: RANDOMNESS ANALYSIS OF END-TO-END DELAY IN RANDOM FORWARDING NETWORKS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The authors propose a mathematical model of random forwarding networks (FNs) and derive the expression of end-to-end delay distribution in different FNs. The topic is interesting, but the quality of the manuscript can be improved in terms of its problem novelty and main contribution. The following comm... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: RANDOMNESS ANALYSIS OF END-TO-END DELAY IN RANDOM FORWARDING NETWORKS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: the authors have addressed all the mentioned comments, i have no more comments
Experimental design: The authors have addressed all the mentioned comments, i have no more comments
Validity of the findings: The authors have addressed all the mentioned comments, i have no more comments
Additional comments... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: GPUTREESHAP: MASSIVELY PARALLEL EXACT CALCULATION OF SHAP SCORES FOR TREE ENSEMBLES
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The submission is well-written and structured appropriately. The key ideas of the research are communicated clearly. The literature review and background are sufficient to understand the article. The results are presented clearly and are supported by the availability of source-code and datasets.
Experi... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: GPUTREESHAP: MASSIVELY PARALLEL EXACT CALCULATION OF SHAP SCORES FOR TREE ENSEMBLES
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The writing is generally good. The introduction, literature review, and background are sufficient and well-written.
Some minor issues are:
1. In Figure 1, please explain in the caption or text what the left/right arrows, solid/dash arrows mean for more clarification.
2. In Figure 2, it is better to... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: GPUTREESHAP: MASSIVELY PARALLEL EXACT CALCULATION OF SHAP SCORES FOR TREE ENSEMBLES
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: This paper is about a GPU implementation of the well-known machine learning interpretability method SHAP. The method is recursive polynomial time and until now was only possible to use it on relatively small datasets. The proposed GPU implementation achieves up to 19x speedups. I have not seen any simi... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: GPUTREESHAP: MASSIVELY PARALLEL EXACT CALCULATION OF SHAP SCORES FOR TREE ENSEMBLES
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: No comment
Experimental design: No comment
Validity of the findings: No comment
Additional comments: If the authors agree, the caption of Figure 1 may need more explanation on this question:
Which arrow (left or right) corresponds to the path where the condition of the parent node is met?
Otherwise... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: GPUTREESHAP: MASSIVELY PARALLEL EXACT CALCULATION OF SHAP SCORES FOR TREE ENSEMBLES
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: No comment.
Experimental design: No comment.
Validity of the findings: No comment
Additional comments: The current submitted updates are sufficient for paper publication. |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: SOFT AND HARD SKILLS IDENTIFICATION: INSIGHTS FROM IT JOB ADVERTISEMENTS IN THE CIS REGION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: - In general, I found the manuscript to be mostly well written. The text could however benefit from some academic proofreading with regards to more minor stuff related to punctuation and minor readability edits.
-While Table 1 is briefly introduced at the start of “Related Work”, it could be introduc... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: SOFT AND HARD SKILLS IDENTIFICATION: INSIGHTS FROM IT JOB ADVERTISEMENTS IN THE CIS REGION
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: Summary: The author of this paper studied the demand for skills in the IT-sphere to discover the mapping between required skill-sets and job occupations.
The proposed methodology for skills identification uses natural language processing, hierarchical clustering, and association mining techniques.
... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: SOFT AND HARD SKILLS IDENTIFICATION: INSIGHTS FROM IT JOB ADVERTISEMENTS IN THE CIS REGION
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The author has improved on all points raised in my previous review well. Most commendable are the new threats section and the shared raw data. In my opinion, the manuscript can be published.
Experimental design: -
Validity of the findings: -
Additional comments: No additional comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: SOFT AND HARD SKILLS IDENTIFICATION: INSIGHTS FROM IT JOB ADVERTISEMENTS IN THE CIS REGION
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The paper is clear and well written.
Experimental design: The research is original and within Aims and Scope of the journal.
Validity of the findings: All the data have been provided and the analysis are well explained.
Additional comments: Thanks to the author for the revised version of the paper. I f... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: RIDER WEED DEEP RESIDUAL NETWORK-BASED INCREMENTAL MODEL FOR TEXT CLASSIFICATION USING MULTIDIMENSIONAL FEATURES AND MAPREDUCE
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: In this paper, author presented a MapReduce model for text classification in big data. However, there are some limitations that must be addressed as follows.
1. The abstract is very lengthy and not attractive. Some sentences in abstract should be summarized to make it more attractive for readers.
2.... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: RIDER WEED DEEP RESIDUAL NETWORK-BASED INCREMENTAL MODEL FOR TEXT CLASSIFICATION USING MULTIDIMENSIONAL FEATURES AND MAPREDUCE
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: The increasing demand for information and rapid growth of big data have dramatically increased textual data. The amount of different kinds of data has led to the overloading of information. For obtaining useful text information, the classification of texts is considered an imperative task. This paper d... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: RIDER WEED DEEP RESIDUAL NETWORK-BASED INCREMENTAL MODEL FOR TEXT CLASSIFICATION USING MULTIDIMENSIONAL FEATURES AND MAPREDUCE
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The increasing demand for information and rapid growth of big data has dramatically increased textual data. For obtaining useful text information, the classification of texts is considered an imperative task.
Experimental design: This paper develops a hybrid optimization algorithm for classifying the t... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A STORAGE-EFFICIENT ENSEMBLE CLASSIFICATION USING FILTER SHARING ON BINARIZED CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The authors submitted a very interesting work, my suggestions to improve it are:
1.I suggest to add it to github “The source code for reproducing the experiments will be available upon publication of the manuscript”
2.The contribution is no introduced clearly on the theoretical analysis; also if ver... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A STORAGE-EFFICIENT ENSEMBLE CLASSIFICATION USING FILTER SHARING ON BINARIZED CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: 1.The last word on line 153 is wrong. Suggest to examine each word and sentence carefully.
2. Suggest to polish the language of the writing.
Experimental design: No comment
Validity of the findings: Figure 5(b) does not contained data when in the fusion ensemble due to the limitation of GPU resources... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A STORAGE-EFFICIENT ENSEMBLE CLASSIFICATION USING FILTER SHARING ON BINARIZED CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: This is the review report of the paper entitled "A storage-efficient ensemble classification using filter sharing on binarized convolutional neural networks".
The paper presents a very important topic and is well presented. However, I have some comments to improve the paper.
1- In the abstract, add... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A STORAGE-EFFICIENT ENSEMBLE CLASSIFICATION USING FILTER SHARING ON BINARIZED CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: Revision well done
Experimental design: Revision well done
Validity of the findings: Revision well done
Additional comments: No additional comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A STORAGE-EFFICIENT ENSEMBLE CLASSIFICATION USING FILTER SHARING ON BINARIZED CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: No comment
Experimental design: No comment
Validity of the findings: No comment
Additional comments: No comment |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: A STORAGE-EFFICIENT ENSEMBLE CLASSIFICATION USING FILTER SHARING ON BINARIZED CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 3 | Basic reporting: The authors addressed the comments in a very good way.
Experimental design: The authors addressed the comments in a very good way.
Validity of the findings: The authors addressed the comments in a very good way.
Additional comments: No additional comments |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: LORM: A NOVEL REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR BIPED GAIT CONTROL
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: This paper proposes a biped control framework based on reinforcement learning. The expert trajectory of the traditional controller is introduced to accelerate the training. And the exploration of reinforcement learning ensures the final model outperforms the expert instead of simply imitating the exper... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: LORM: A NOVEL REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR BIPED GAIT CONTROL
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: An RL based framework for gait controlling of biped robot is proposed in this paper to overcome the complications of dynamics design and calculation. The results validated the efficiency and the advantages of the proposed method. However, there are several suggestions for the authors
1. As the propose... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: LORM: A NOVEL REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR BIPED GAIT CONTROL
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: The manuscript has been well-revised. Literature review is sufficient with good background provided. The results contains clear definition of all terms.
Experimental design: The experiment design is clear with sufficient details and justified. The manuscript has met the standards of the journal.
Validi... |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: LORM: A NOVEL REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR BIPED GAIT CONTROL
Review round: 2
Reviewer: 2 | Basic reporting: all the issues I raised have been addressed
Experimental design: all the issues I raised have been addressed
Validity of the findings: all the issues I raised have been addressed
Additional comments: all the issues I raised have been addressed |
You are one of the reviewers, your task is to write a review for the article. You will be given the title of the article, the number of the round in which the article is located, and your order among the reviewers. | Title: VEGETATION INDICES’ SPATIAL PREDICTION BASED NOVEL ALGORITHM FOR DETERMINING TSUNAMI RISK AREAS AND RISK VALUES
Review round: 1
Reviewer: 1 | Basic reporting: 1. There is a need to check the grammar, spelling, sentence structures, etc. of the paper.
In the title “A New Algorithm for …….on Spatial Predicition of 3 Vegetation Index”. The word “Index” should be in plural form since more than one index is used in the paper.
In other parts of the paper, I fou... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.