MesoMathematics / docs /REPRODUCING.md
anon-d3a4's picture
Add files using upload-large-folder tool
e4dca97 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
5.47 kB
# Reproducibility package
This directory reproduces the empirical claims in Sections 3 and 4 of the
paper. It is intentionally separate from `../paper`: the paper is a readable
article, while this directory fixes executable objects, parameters and result
artifacts.
## Frozen corpus
| component | value |
|---|---|
| Mathlib release | `v4.33.0` |
| Mathlib commit | `db584cd6d46c92f209a44c0f1c829460d327499d` |
| Lean toolchain | `leanprover/lean4:v4.33.0` |
| Raw schema | `mesomath-corpus-v2` |
| set.mm commit | `057f4c461055d0b1ed78d9d333aa3de34d9771fa` |
The tag is descriptive; the full commit is authoritative.
## Paper claims and experiment IDs
| ID | Paper claim | Inputs | Result artifact |
|---|---|---|---|
| `S3.1-depth-growth` | theorem graph is deep and sparse | primary theorem view | `results/S3.1-depth-growth.json` |
| `S3.2-namespace-depth` | namespace depths differ by over an order of magnitude | primary theorem view | `results/S3.2-namespace-depth.json` |
| `S3.3-compression-reuse` | proof-term/statement ratio is associated with reuse | primary theorem view | `results/S3.3-compression-reuse.json` |
| `S3.4-projection-geometry` | measurements depend on projection, but detected geometry lies within degree-preserving nulls | primary theorem hypergraph | `results/S3.4-projection-geometry.json` |
| `S3.4-metamath` | depth growth is similar across libraries but compression--reuse is not | Mathlib primary view and pinned `set.mm` | `results/S3.4-metamath.json` |
| `S4.1-navigation` | structure ranks a reviewed target above random | v4.33 declaration view and reviewed labels | `results/S4.1-navigation.json` |
`claims.json` is the machine-readable version of this table. A result is not
ready to enter the paper until it records the corpus manifest hash, analysis
configuration and random seed where relevant. Sections 3 and 4 have been
rerun on v4.33.0. Section 4's exact historical inputs remain as a regression
fixture, while the paper result uses the reviewed current statements and a
graph built entirely from the pinned v4.33.0 export.
## Layout
```text
experiments/
claims.json claim-to-artifact registry
spec/ exact mathematical and computational objects
LEGACY_AUDIT.md claim-by-claim audit of the old implementation
legacy/ small immutable regression fixtures from old runs
lean/ native Mathlib environment extractor
analysis/ statistical analysis and figure generation
labels/ reviewed external labels (for Section 4)
data/raw/ Lean exports; generated, not committed
data/derived/ declared graph views; generated, not committed
results/ reviewed machine-readable result manifests
```
## Reproduction stages
1. Build and test the native extractor:
```sh
cd lean
lake update
lake exe cache get
lake build
lake exe meso-extractor-tests
```
2. Export the Mathlib corpus:
```sh
lake exe meso-extract --out ../data/raw/mathlib-v4.33.0
```
A fast format smoke test may import one module explicitly; this is never a
substitute for the full command above:
```sh
lake exe meso-extract \
--out /tmp/mesomath-smoke \
--import-module Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq \
--module-prefix Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq \
--limit 25
```
3. Materialize the paper's graph views and run analyses:
```sh
cd ../analysis
uv run pytest
uv run mesomath-analysis views \
../data/raw/mathlib-v4.33.0 ../data/derived/mathlib-v4.33.0
uv run mesomath-analysis run-s3 \
../data/derived/mathlib-v4.33.0/primary-theorem-hypergraph.json \
../results
uv run mesomath-analysis run-geometry \
../data/derived/mathlib-v4.33.0/primary-theorem-hypergraph.json \
../results/S3.4-projection-geometry.json
```
The `views` command writes both the primary auto/private-filtered theorem
hypergraph and an internal-name-only sensitivity view matching the legacy
filter. Section 3 commands use the primary file unless explicitly pointed
at the sensitivity file.
4. Clone the exact Metamath Proof Explorer snapshot and run the independent
cross-library adapter:
```sh
git clone https://github.com/metamath/set.mm ../data/raw/set.mm
git -C ../data/raw/set.mm checkout 057f4c461055d0b1ed78d9d333aa3de34d9771fa
uv run mesomath-analysis run-metamath \
../data/raw/set.mm ../results/S3.4-metamath.json \
--revision 057f4c461055d0b1ed78d9d333aa3de34d9771fa \
--mathlib-depth-result ../results/S3.1-depth-growth.json \
--mathlib-compression-result ../results/S3.3-compression-reuse.json
```
The parser's theorem count and selected reuse/proof-size values were
cross-checked against the official C verifier; the exact audit is recorded
in `verification/metamath-official-verifier.md`.
5. Run the reviewed v4.33 declaration-graph experiment:
```sh
uv run mesomath-analysis run-navigation \
../data/raw/mathlib-v4.33.0 \
../labels/ahlfors_positive_declarations_v4.33-review.csv \
../results/S4.1-navigation.json
```
A complete second run produced a byte-identical result file (SHA-256
`76c7510f933daa39b0ae2ba42bd8e1d1728c481948bf03811a4e40aed4a2e9f3`).
The full-corpus commands are deliberately separate from unit tests: importing
and traversing all of Mathlib is an experiment run, not a build step.