Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
choice
stringlengths
7
30
picked
stringlengths
4
185
why
stringlengths
27
284
Reasoning model
GLM 5.3, filed at 753B parameters, FP8 (753 GB of weights), GLM-5.3 bespoke license, served on vLLM on one node in the operator's own facility in the United States
The model the requirement names; its license permits commercial use, fine tuning and redistribution, so the operator holds its own copy with no per token obligation; carries the triage and recovery drafting, the command center's cited conversational interface and ontology maintenance
Site tier parsing model
Qwen3.8 27B, dense, Apache-2.0, served at FP8 (about 31 GB of weights) on one 48 GB PCIe card in an air cooled server
High volume thread and note parsing over years of archived email and chat and the live threads, a throughput workload kept off the frontier node so coordinator sessions keep their concurrency; about 13 GB of KV ceiling on the card
Embedding model
Qwen3-Embedding 0.6B, Apache-2.0, about 1.2 GB at BF16 and about 0.6 GB at 8 bit, sharing the site tier server, 32K context window
Embeddings over threads, notes and resolutions so retrieval finds the past exception that matches this week's; permission aware, returning only what the asking coordinator could already open
Frontier hardware
141 GB HBM GPU class, eight GPUs per node, one node (1,128 GB)
Holds 904 GB (753 GB of FP8 weights times the 1.2 planning factor) with about 280 GB of KV cache ceiling at the 0.92 utilization the sizing rule allows; about 15 kW of rack power per node with margin, 10 RU, 10 to 35 C inlet
Frontier footprint sizing rule
Frontier Model GPU Footprint Sizing Rule (vLLM, SGLang): parameters times one byte at FP8 times 1.2
Turns filed parameter counts into a memory requirement before any workload is placed
Node count rule
GLM 5.3 node count by GPU class
One node of eight 141 GB GPUs; two nodes of the 80 GB class or BF16 serving (about 1.5 TB) rejected because they add a second node joined over an interconnect
Site tier hardware
48 GB PCIe card class, one card, in an air cooled PCIe server the facility's server room already takes
Fits the parsing model's FP8 weights with KV ceiling to spare and carries the embedding model beside it without a second server
Serving runtime
vLLM
Serves the FP8 weights within the KV cache ceiling the sizing reserves
Registry
MLflow Model Registry on site
Pinned model images; serving restarts from pinned images with a rollback exercised once under observation; the desk never runs on an unobserved weight change
Event backbone
Apache Kafka (KRaft mode)
Ordering by offsets and per stream sequence numbers with each source's clock offset recorded, at least once delivery with idempotent projection, buffering in the retained log, replication inside the facility
Time series store
InfluxDB 3 Core
Tracking telemetry under the object model
Orchestration
Kubernetes
Containers for the services and the serving tier inside the facility
Identity
Keycloak
Federated identity for coordinators and permission aware retrieval scoped by each shipper's data terms
Observability
Prometheus
Observes the running system
Sensing
None; the existing carrier tracking and visibility feeds are read
Trucks are seen through feeds the operator already owns; no camera, positioning hardware or edge box is built
Pattern: memory
Memory loops over confirmed outcomes, nothing trained, fine tuned or distilled into weights
The requirement's own words: better every week without training a model on the fly; memory is auditable where weights are not
Pattern: approval
Every draft confirmed by a named coordinator; one gated write path into the scheduling tool
Confirmations logged as ground truth, with known answer probes and weekly sampling against rubber stamping
Pattern: baseline
The pilot lane group's exception measures are recorded before any coordinator sees a draft
Improvement is measured against evidence, not impression; the phase 1 gate reads time to resolve and repeat exceptions against that baseline
Pattern: boundary
The operator's own hardware in its own facility in the United States; no inference call, retrieval or draft leaves the building; only approved carrier messages and shipper notices cross
Shipper and carrier data never leave the operator's hardware, open weights only, no third party model service

A Self-Improving AI System for Carrier Exception Handling in the United States: ontology and model register

The object model and the model and equipment register from A Self-Improving AI System for Carrier Exception Handling in the United States, an open reference architecture by CodeNinja Atoms. Self-improving AI system for carrier exception handling in the United States: one freight ontology, three drafting agents, GLM 5.3 on the operator's own node. Part of the Vertical-Driven Architectures series; every design in the series is also a row in the cumulative dataset https://huggingface.co/datasets/CodeNinjatools/vertical-driven-architectures.

Files

File What it holds
objects.json 16 typed objects (Shipper, Order, Shipment, Stop, Appointment, Carrier, Driver, Tracking event, Exception, Exception type, Action, Resolution, Standing fix, Claim, Scorecard entry, Exception coordinator), with 13 typed links. Format hyper-ontology/1: designed with CodeNinja Praxis, implemented with Hyper Ontology.
models.csv The model and equipment register: every model and hardware class with its license and the reason for each choice (19 rows).

How to use it

Load objects.json with the Hyper Ontology loader (pip install hyper-ontology, see https://codeatoms.ai/developer/) or read it as plain JSON. The operator is described by class, never by name.

Made with CodeNinja Praxis and Hyper Ontology. One of the CodeNinja Atoms designs for self-improving AI system. CC BY 4.0.

Downloads last month
35

Collection including CodeNinjatools/carrier-exceptions-us-ontology