author string | post string | ori_topic string | ori_id string | new_topic string | label int64 | type_idx int64 | new_id int64 | arc_id int64 | text string | pos_text string | text_s string | topic string | topic_str string | seen? int64 | contains_topic? int64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
david gilvarg | I would quibble with the metaphor, but nothing else in this article. I would say that pretending that the flood of refugees is the chief terrorist threat while ignoring the tens of thousands radicalized EU citizens is more like raising the height of the dyke while IGNORING the leaks...how cynical is it to seize on the fact that one of the dozens who planned and carried out the Paris atrocities was hidden in the refugee flow? | europe | A2556-P | terrorism | 0 | 3 | 5,851 | 16,681,228 | [["would", "quibble", "metaphor", "nothing", "else", "article"], ["would", "say", "pretending", "flood", "refugees", "chief", "terrorist", "threat", "ignoring", "tens", "thousands", "radicalized", "eu", "citizens", "like", "raising", "height", "dyke", "ignoring", "leaks", "...", "cynical", "seize", "fact", "one", "dozens", "planned", "carried", "paris", "atrocities", "hidden", "refugee", "flow"]] | [["MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "VBN", "NNP", "NNS", "IN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", ".", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"]] | would quibble metaphor nothing else article. would say pretending flood refugees chief terrorist threat ignoring tens thousands radicalized eu citizens like raising height dyke ignoring leaks ... cynical seize fact one dozens planned carried paris atrocities hidden refugee flow | ["terrorism"] | terrorism | 1 | 0 |
david gilvarg | I would quibble with the metaphor, but nothing else in this article. I would say that pretending that the flood of refugees is the chief terrorist threat while ignoring the tens of thousands radicalized EU citizens is more like raising the height of the dyke while IGNORING the leaks...how cynical is it to seize on the fact that one of the dozens who planned and carried out the Paris atrocities was hidden in the refugee flow? | europe | A2556-P | refugee | 0 | 2 | 5,852 | 16,681,228 | [["would", "quibble", "metaphor", "nothing", "else", "article"], ["would", "say", "pretending", "flood", "refugees", "chief", "terrorist", "threat", "ignoring", "tens", "thousands", "radicalized", "eu", "citizens", "like", "raising", "height", "dyke", "ignoring", "leaks", "...", "cynical", "seize", "fact", "one", "dozens", "planned", "carried", "paris", "atrocities", "hidden", "refugee", "flow"]] | [["MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "VBN", "NNP", "NNS", "IN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", ".", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"]] | would quibble metaphor nothing else article. would say pretending flood refugees chief terrorist threat ignoring tens thousands radicalized eu citizens like raising height dyke ignoring leaks ... cynical seize fact one dozens planned carried paris atrocities hidden refugee flow | ["refugee"] | refugee | 1 | 1 |
david gilvarg | I would quibble with the metaphor, but nothing else in this article. I would say that pretending that the flood of refugees is the chief terrorist threat while ignoring the tens of thousands radicalized EU citizens is more like raising the height of the dyke while IGNORING the leaks...how cynical is it to seize on the fact that one of the dozens who planned and carried out the Paris atrocities was hidden in the refugee flow? | europe | A2556-P | terrorist | 0 | 3 | 5,853 | 16,681,228 | [["would", "quibble", "metaphor", "nothing", "else", "article"], ["would", "say", "pretending", "flood", "refugees", "chief", "terrorist", "threat", "ignoring", "tens", "thousands", "radicalized", "eu", "citizens", "like", "raising", "height", "dyke", "ignoring", "leaks", "...", "cynical", "seize", "fact", "one", "dozens", "planned", "carried", "paris", "atrocities", "hidden", "refugee", "flow"]] | [["MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "VBN", "NNP", "NNS", "IN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", ".", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"]] | would quibble metaphor nothing else article. would say pretending flood refugees chief terrorist threat ignoring tens thousands radicalized eu citizens like raising height dyke ignoring leaks ... cynical seize fact one dozens planned carried paris atrocities hidden refugee flow | ["terrorist"] | terrorist | 1 | 1 |
david gilvarg | I would quibble with the metaphor, but nothing else in this article. I would say that pretending that the flood of refugees is the chief terrorist threat while ignoring the tens of thousands radicalized EU citizens is more like raising the height of the dyke while IGNORING the leaks...how cynical is it to seize on the fact that one of the dozens who planned and carried out the Paris atrocities was hidden in the refugee flow? | refugees | A2557-P | refugees | 1 | 1 | 9,595 | 16,681,228 | [["would", "quibble", "metaphor", "nothing", "else", "article"], ["would", "say", "pretending", "flood", "refugees", "chief", "terrorist", "threat", "ignoring", "tens", "thousands", "radicalized", "eu", "citizens", "like", "raising", "height", "dyke", "ignoring", "leaks", "...", "cynical", "seize", "fact", "one", "dozens", "planned", "carried", "paris", "atrocities", "hidden", "refugee", "flow"]] | [["MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "VBN", "NNP", "NNS", "IN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", ".", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"]] | would quibble metaphor nothing else article. would say pretending flood refugees chief terrorist threat ignoring tens thousands radicalized eu citizens like raising height dyke ignoring leaks ... cynical seize fact one dozens planned carried paris atrocities hidden refugee flow | ["refugee"] | refugee | 1 | 1 |
david gilvarg | I would quibble with the metaphor, but nothing else in this article. I would say that pretending that the flood of refugees is the chief terrorist threat while ignoring the tens of thousands radicalized EU citizens is more like raising the height of the dyke while IGNORING the leaks...how cynical is it to seize on the fact that one of the dozens who planned and carried out the Paris atrocities was hidden in the refugee flow? | refugees | A2557-P | refugee | 1 | 3 | 9,596 | 16,681,228 | [["would", "quibble", "metaphor", "nothing", "else", "article"], ["would", "say", "pretending", "flood", "refugees", "chief", "terrorist", "threat", "ignoring", "tens", "thousands", "radicalized", "eu", "citizens", "like", "raising", "height", "dyke", "ignoring", "leaks", "...", "cynical", "seize", "fact", "one", "dozens", "planned", "carried", "paris", "atrocities", "hidden", "refugee", "flow"]] | [["MD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "RB", "NN"], ["MD", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNS", "VBN", "NNP", "NNS", "IN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", ".", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "VBD", "NNP", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"]] | would quibble metaphor nothing else article. would say pretending flood refugees chief terrorist threat ignoring tens thousands radicalized eu citizens like raising height dyke ignoring leaks ... cynical seize fact one dozens planned carried paris atrocities hidden refugee flow | ["refugee"] | refugee | 1 | 1 |
Michael | As long as he did it on his own time, did not use resources from his employer, and in no way represented himself as acting in an official capacity, he had every right to do what he did. I don't agree with what he did. But he had every right to do it. If employees are able to fire their employees for doing things off duty that the employer doesn't agree with, essentially we don't have a right to free speech anymore. We just have a right to speech that doesn't offend our employer, and that's not much of a right. | speech | A1139-P | speech | 1 | 1 | 19,526 | 2,566,415 | [["long", "time", "use", "resources", "employer", "way", "represented", "acting", "official", "capacity", "every", "right"], ["n't", "agree"], ["every", "right"], ["employees", "able", "fire", "employees", "things", "duty", "employer", "n't", "agree", "essentially", "n't", "right", "free", "speech", "anymore"], ["right", "speech", "n't", "offend", "employer", "'s", "much", "right"]] | [["RB", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "DT", "NN"], ["RB", "VB"], ["DT", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "RB", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "RB"], ["NN", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN"]] | long time use resources employer way represented acting official capacity every right. n't agree. every right. employees able fire employees things duty employer n't agree essentially n't right free speech anymore. right speech n't offend employer 's much right | ["speech"] | speech | 1 | 1 |
Michael | As long as he did it on his own time, did not use resources from his employer, and in no way represented himself as acting in an official capacity, he had every right to do what he did. I don't agree with what he did. But he had every right to do it. If employees are able to fire their employees for doing things off duty that the employer doesn't agree with, essentially we don't have a right to free speech anymore. We just have a right to speech that doesn't offend our employer, and that's not much of a right. | speech | A1139-P | freedom of speech | 1 | 3 | 19,527 | 2,566,415 | [["long", "time", "use", "resources", "employer", "way", "represented", "acting", "official", "capacity", "every", "right"], ["n't", "agree"], ["every", "right"], ["employees", "able", "fire", "employees", "things", "duty", "employer", "n't", "agree", "essentially", "n't", "right", "free", "speech", "anymore"], ["right", "speech", "n't", "offend", "employer", "'s", "much", "right"]] | [["RB", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "DT", "NN"], ["RB", "VB"], ["DT", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "RB", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "RB"], ["NN", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN"]] | long time use resources employer way represented acting official capacity every right. n't agree. every right. employees able fire employees things duty employer n't agree essentially n't right free speech anymore. right speech n't offend employer 's much right | ["freedom", "speech"] | freedom speech | 1 | 0 |
Michael | As long as he did it on his own time, did not use resources from his employer, and in no way represented himself as acting in an official capacity, he had every right to do what he did. I don't agree with what he did. But he had every right to do it. If employees are able to fire their employees for doing things off duty that the employer doesn't agree with, essentially we don't have a right to free speech anymore. We just have a right to speech that doesn't offend our employer, and that's not much of a right. | speech | A1139-P | employee | 1 | 3 | 19,528 | 2,566,415 | [["long", "time", "use", "resources", "employer", "way", "represented", "acting", "official", "capacity", "every", "right"], ["n't", "agree"], ["every", "right"], ["employees", "able", "fire", "employees", "things", "duty", "employer", "n't", "agree", "essentially", "n't", "right", "free", "speech", "anymore"], ["right", "speech", "n't", "offend", "employer", "'s", "much", "right"]] | [["RB", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "VBD", "VBG", "JJ", "NN", "DT", "NN"], ["RB", "VB"], ["DT", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "RB", "RB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "RB"], ["NN", "VB", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN"]] | long time use resources employer way represented acting official capacity every right. n't agree. every right. employees able fire employees things duty employer n't agree essentially n't right free speech anymore. right speech n't offend employer 's much right | ["employee"] | employee | 1 | 1 |
mkb | Cloth, regardless of what colors it is dyed, is just cloth. Paper, regardless of what is printed on it, is just paper. As long as the cloth or paper object is owned by the individual, the State has no business interfering with its disposal unless the disposal process in and of itself creates a hazard for others. The State has no business ascribing positive or negative value to the cloth or paper. | speech | A1137-P | speech | 1 | 1 | 7,028 | 2,566,421 | [["cloth", "regardless", "colors", "dyed", "cloth"], ["paper", "regardless", "printed", "paper"], ["long", "cloth", "paper", "object", "owned", "individual", "state", "business", "interfering", "disposal", "unless", "disposal", "process", "creates", "hazard", "others"], ["state", "business", "ascribing", "positive", "negative", "value", "cloth", "paper"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | cloth regardless colors dyed cloth. paper regardless printed paper. long cloth paper object owned individual state business interfering disposal unless disposal process creates hazard others. state business ascribing positive negative value cloth paper | ["speech"] | speech | 1 | 0 |
mkb | Cloth, regardless of what colors it is dyed, is just cloth. Paper, regardless of what is printed on it, is just paper. As long as the cloth or paper object is owned by the individual, the State has no business interfering with its disposal unless the disposal process in and of itself creates a hazard for others. The State has no business ascribing positive or negative value to the cloth or paper. | speech | A1137-P | paper money | 1 | 3 | 7,029 | 2,566,421 | [["cloth", "regardless", "colors", "dyed", "cloth"], ["paper", "regardless", "printed", "paper"], ["long", "cloth", "paper", "object", "owned", "individual", "state", "business", "interfering", "disposal", "unless", "disposal", "process", "creates", "hazard", "others"], ["state", "business", "ascribing", "positive", "negative", "value", "cloth", "paper"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | cloth regardless colors dyed cloth. paper regardless printed paper. long cloth paper object owned individual state business interfering disposal unless disposal process creates hazard others. state business ascribing positive negative value cloth paper | ["paper", "money"] | paper money | 1 | 0 |
mkb | Cloth, regardless of what colors it is dyed, is just cloth. Paper, regardless of what is printed on it, is just paper. As long as the cloth or paper object is owned by the individual, the State has no business interfering with its disposal unless the disposal process in and of itself creates a hazard for others. The State has no business ascribing positive or negative value to the cloth or paper. | speech | A1137-P | paper | 1 | 2 | 7,030 | 2,566,421 | [["cloth", "regardless", "colors", "dyed", "cloth"], ["paper", "regardless", "printed", "paper"], ["long", "cloth", "paper", "object", "owned", "individual", "state", "business", "interfering", "disposal", "unless", "disposal", "process", "creates", "hazard", "others"], ["state", "business", "ascribing", "positive", "negative", "value", "cloth", "paper"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | cloth regardless colors dyed cloth. paper regardless printed paper. long cloth paper object owned individual state business interfering disposal unless disposal process creates hazard others. state business ascribing positive negative value cloth paper | ["paper"] | paper | 1 | 1 |
mkb | Cloth, regardless of what colors it is dyed, is just cloth. Paper, regardless of what is printed on it, is just paper. As long as the cloth or paper object is owned by the individual, the State has no business interfering with its disposal unless the disposal process in and of itself creates a hazard for others. The State has no business ascribing positive or negative value to the cloth or paper. | speech | A1137-P | cloth | 2 | 2 | 7,031 | 2,566,421 | [["cloth", "regardless", "colors", "dyed", "cloth"], ["paper", "regardless", "printed", "paper"], ["long", "cloth", "paper", "object", "owned", "individual", "state", "business", "interfering", "disposal", "unless", "disposal", "process", "creates", "hazard", "others"], ["state", "business", "ascribing", "positive", "negative", "value", "cloth", "paper"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | cloth regardless colors dyed cloth. paper regardless printed paper. long cloth paper object owned individual state business interfering disposal unless disposal process creates hazard others. state business ascribing positive negative value cloth paper | ["cloth"] | cloth | 1 | 1 |
mkb | Cloth, regardless of what colors it is dyed, is just cloth. Paper, regardless of what is printed on it, is just paper. As long as the cloth or paper object is owned by the individual, the State has no business interfering with its disposal unless the disposal process in and of itself creates a hazard for others. The State has no business ascribing positive or negative value to the cloth or paper. | speech | A1137-P | recycle | 1 | 3 | 7,032 | 2,566,421 | [["cloth", "regardless", "colors", "dyed", "cloth"], ["paper", "regardless", "printed", "paper"], ["long", "cloth", "paper", "object", "owned", "individual", "state", "business", "interfering", "disposal", "unless", "disposal", "process", "creates", "hazard", "others"], ["state", "business", "ascribing", "positive", "negative", "value", "cloth", "paper"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | cloth regardless colors dyed cloth. paper regardless printed paper. long cloth paper object owned individual state business interfering disposal unless disposal process creates hazard others. state business ascribing positive negative value cloth paper | ["recycle"] | recycle | 1 | 0 |
mkb | Cloth, regardless of what colors it is dyed, is just cloth. Paper, regardless of what is printed on it, is just paper. As long as the cloth or paper object is owned by the individual, the State has no business interfering with its disposal unless the disposal process in and of itself creates a hazard for others. The State has no business ascribing positive or negative value to the cloth or paper. | speech | A1137-P | c,oth | 2 | 3 | 7,033 | 2,566,421 | [["cloth", "regardless", "colors", "dyed", "cloth"], ["paper", "regardless", "printed", "paper"], ["long", "cloth", "paper", "object", "owned", "individual", "state", "business", "interfering", "disposal", "unless", "disposal", "process", "creates", "hazard", "others"], ["state", "business", "ascribing", "positive", "negative", "value", "cloth", "paper"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | cloth regardless colors dyed cloth. paper regardless printed paper. long cloth paper object owned individual state business interfering disposal unless disposal process creates hazard others. state business ascribing positive negative value cloth paper | ["c", "oth"] | c oth | 1 | 0 |
mkb | Cloth, regardless of what colors it is dyed, is just cloth. Paper, regardless of what is printed on it, is just paper. As long as the cloth or paper object is owned by the individual, the State has no business interfering with its disposal unless the disposal process in and of itself creates a hazard for others. The State has no business ascribing positive or negative value to the cloth or paper. | public workers | A1138-P | public workers | 0 | 1 | 7,380 | 2,566,421 | [["cloth", "regardless", "colors", "dyed", "cloth"], ["paper", "regardless", "printed", "paper"], ["long", "cloth", "paper", "object", "owned", "individual", "state", "business", "interfering", "disposal", "unless", "disposal", "process", "creates", "hazard", "others"], ["state", "business", "ascribing", "positive", "negative", "value", "cloth", "paper"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | cloth regardless colors dyed cloth. paper regardless printed paper. long cloth paper object owned individual state business interfering disposal unless disposal process creates hazard others. state business ascribing positive negative value cloth paper | ["public", "worker"] | public worker | 1 | 0 |
mkb | Cloth, regardless of what colors it is dyed, is just cloth. Paper, regardless of what is printed on it, is just paper. As long as the cloth or paper object is owned by the individual, the State has no business interfering with its disposal unless the disposal process in and of itself creates a hazard for others. The State has no business ascribing positive or negative value to the cloth or paper. | public workers | A1138-P | paper | 0 | 3 | 7,381 | 2,566,421 | [["cloth", "regardless", "colors", "dyed", "cloth"], ["paper", "regardless", "printed", "paper"], ["long", "cloth", "paper", "object", "owned", "individual", "state", "business", "interfering", "disposal", "unless", "disposal", "process", "creates", "hazard", "others"], ["state", "business", "ascribing", "positive", "negative", "value", "cloth", "paper"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | cloth regardless colors dyed cloth. paper regardless printed paper. long cloth paper object owned individual state business interfering disposal unless disposal process creates hazard others. state business ascribing positive negative value cloth paper | ["paper"] | paper | 1 | 1 |
mkb | Cloth, regardless of what colors it is dyed, is just cloth. Paper, regardless of what is printed on it, is just paper. As long as the cloth or paper object is owned by the individual, the State has no business interfering with its disposal unless the disposal process in and of itself creates a hazard for others. The State has no business ascribing positive or negative value to the cloth or paper. | public workers | A1138-P | the state | 0 | 2 | 7,382 | 2,566,421 | [["cloth", "regardless", "colors", "dyed", "cloth"], ["paper", "regardless", "printed", "paper"], ["long", "cloth", "paper", "object", "owned", "individual", "state", "business", "interfering", "disposal", "unless", "disposal", "process", "creates", "hazard", "others"], ["state", "business", "ascribing", "positive", "negative", "value", "cloth", "paper"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | cloth regardless colors dyed cloth. paper regardless printed paper. long cloth paper object owned individual state business interfering disposal unless disposal process creates hazard others. state business ascribing positive negative value cloth paper | ["state"] | state | 1 | 1 |
mkb | Cloth, regardless of what colors it is dyed, is just cloth. Paper, regardless of what is printed on it, is just paper. As long as the cloth or paper object is owned by the individual, the State has no business interfering with its disposal unless the disposal process in and of itself creates a hazard for others. The State has no business ascribing positive or negative value to the cloth or paper. | public workers | A1138-P | state legislature | 0 | 2 | 7,383 | 2,566,421 | [["cloth", "regardless", "colors", "dyed", "cloth"], ["paper", "regardless", "printed", "paper"], ["long", "cloth", "paper", "object", "owned", "individual", "state", "business", "interfering", "disposal", "unless", "disposal", "process", "creates", "hazard", "others"], ["state", "business", "ascribing", "positive", "negative", "value", "cloth", "paper"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | cloth regardless colors dyed cloth. paper regardless printed paper. long cloth paper object owned individual state business interfering disposal unless disposal process creates hazard others. state business ascribing positive negative value cloth paper | ["state", "legislature"] | state legislature | 1 | 0 |
mkb | Cloth, regardless of what colors it is dyed, is just cloth. Paper, regardless of what is printed on it, is just paper. As long as the cloth or paper object is owned by the individual, the State has no business interfering with its disposal unless the disposal process in and of itself creates a hazard for others. The State has no business ascribing positive or negative value to the cloth or paper. | public workers | A1138-P | paper disposal process | 0 | 3 | 7,384 | 2,566,421 | [["cloth", "regardless", "colors", "dyed", "cloth"], ["paper", "regardless", "printed", "paper"], ["long", "cloth", "paper", "object", "owned", "individual", "state", "business", "interfering", "disposal", "unless", "disposal", "process", "creates", "hazard", "others"], ["state", "business", "ascribing", "positive", "negative", "value", "cloth", "paper"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | cloth regardless colors dyed cloth. paper regardless printed paper. long cloth paper object owned individual state business interfering disposal unless disposal process creates hazard others. state business ascribing positive negative value cloth paper | ["paper", "disposal", "process"] | paper disposal process | 1 | 0 |
mkb | Cloth, regardless of what colors it is dyed, is just cloth. Paper, regardless of what is printed on it, is just paper. As long as the cloth or paper object is owned by the individual, the State has no business interfering with its disposal unless the disposal process in and of itself creates a hazard for others. The State has no business ascribing positive or negative value to the cloth or paper. | public workers | A1138-P | disposal | 0 | 3 | 7,385 | 2,566,421 | [["cloth", "regardless", "colors", "dyed", "cloth"], ["paper", "regardless", "printed", "paper"], ["long", "cloth", "paper", "object", "owned", "individual", "state", "business", "interfering", "disposal", "unless", "disposal", "process", "creates", "hazard", "others"], ["state", "business", "ascribing", "positive", "negative", "value", "cloth", "paper"]] | [["NNP", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NN", "VBG", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | cloth regardless colors dyed cloth. paper regardless printed paper. long cloth paper object owned individual state business interfering disposal unless disposal process creates hazard others. state business ascribing positive negative value cloth paper | ["disposal"] | disposal | 1 | 1 |
Terry McKenna | Why was this lobbyist published without at least asking them we they won't also lobby for true best practices. We learned in the gulf what can go wrong. Well the Atlantic is stormier. So what new technology exists to quickly contain a spill? In the late 1950s there was an oil tanker incident in the Atlantic. All I remember about it is my mother bringing nail polish remover to the beach to clean off the tar balls from our legs. | the atlantic coast | A1363-P | the atlantic coast | 1 | 1 | 7,719 | 14,166,293 | [["lobbyist", "published", "without", "least", "asking", "wo", "n't", "also", "lobby", "true", "best", "practices"], ["learned", "gulf", "go", "wrong"], ["well", "atlantic", "stormier"], ["new", "technology", "exists", "quickly", "contain", "spill"], ["late", "1950s", "oil", "tanker", "incident", "atlantic"], ["remember", "mother", "bringing", "nail", "polish", "remover", "beach", "clean", "tar", "balls", "legs"]] | [["NN", "VBN", "IN", "JJS", "VBG", "MD", "RB", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "JJS", "NNS"], ["VBD", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["UH", "NNP", "JJR"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"]] | lobbyist published without least asking wo n't also lobby true best practices. learned gulf go wrong. well atlantic stormier. new technology exists quickly contain spill. late 1950s oil tanker incident atlantic. remember mother bringing nail polish remover beach clean tar balls legs | ["atlantic", "coast"] | atlantic coast | 1 | 0 |
Terry McKenna | Why was this lobbyist published without at least asking them we they won't also lobby for true best practices. We learned in the gulf what can go wrong. Well the Atlantic is stormier. So what new technology exists to quickly contain a spill? In the late 1950s there was an oil tanker incident in the Atlantic. All I remember about it is my mother bringing nail polish remover to the beach to clean off the tar balls from our legs. | the atlantic coast | A1363-P | lobby | 1 | 3 | 7,720 | 14,166,293 | [["lobbyist", "published", "without", "least", "asking", "wo", "n't", "also", "lobby", "true", "best", "practices"], ["learned", "gulf", "go", "wrong"], ["well", "atlantic", "stormier"], ["new", "technology", "exists", "quickly", "contain", "spill"], ["late", "1950s", "oil", "tanker", "incident", "atlantic"], ["remember", "mother", "bringing", "nail", "polish", "remover", "beach", "clean", "tar", "balls", "legs"]] | [["NN", "VBN", "IN", "JJS", "VBG", "MD", "RB", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "JJS", "NNS"], ["VBD", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["UH", "NNP", "JJR"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"]] | lobbyist published without least asking wo n't also lobby true best practices. learned gulf go wrong. well atlantic stormier. new technology exists quickly contain spill. late 1950s oil tanker incident atlantic. remember mother bringing nail polish remover beach clean tar balls legs | ["lobby"] | lobby | 1 | 1 |
Terry McKenna | Why was this lobbyist published without at least asking them we they won't also lobby for true best practices. We learned in the gulf what can go wrong. Well the Atlantic is stormier. So what new technology exists to quickly contain a spill? In the late 1950s there was an oil tanker incident in the Atlantic. All I remember about it is my mother bringing nail polish remover to the beach to clean off the tar balls from our legs. | the atlantic coast | A1363-P | oil tanker spills | 1 | 3 | 7,721 | 14,166,293 | [["lobbyist", "published", "without", "least", "asking", "wo", "n't", "also", "lobby", "true", "best", "practices"], ["learned", "gulf", "go", "wrong"], ["well", "atlantic", "stormier"], ["new", "technology", "exists", "quickly", "contain", "spill"], ["late", "1950s", "oil", "tanker", "incident", "atlantic"], ["remember", "mother", "bringing", "nail", "polish", "remover", "beach", "clean", "tar", "balls", "legs"]] | [["NN", "VBN", "IN", "JJS", "VBG", "MD", "RB", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "JJS", "NNS"], ["VBD", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["UH", "NNP", "JJR"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"]] | lobbyist published without least asking wo n't also lobby true best practices. learned gulf go wrong. well atlantic stormier. new technology exists quickly contain spill. late 1950s oil tanker incident atlantic. remember mother bringing nail polish remover beach clean tar balls legs | ["oil", "tanker", "spill"] | oil tanker spill | 1 | 0 |
Terry McKenna | Why was this lobbyist published without at least asking them we they won't also lobby for true best practices. We learned in the gulf what can go wrong. Well the Atlantic is stormier. So what new technology exists to quickly contain a spill? In the late 1950s there was an oil tanker incident in the Atlantic. All I remember about it is my mother bringing nail polish remover to the beach to clean off the tar balls from our legs. | the atlantic coast | A1363-P | oil lobbyists | 0 | 2 | 7,722 | 14,166,293 | [["lobbyist", "published", "without", "least", "asking", "wo", "n't", "also", "lobby", "true", "best", "practices"], ["learned", "gulf", "go", "wrong"], ["well", "atlantic", "stormier"], ["new", "technology", "exists", "quickly", "contain", "spill"], ["late", "1950s", "oil", "tanker", "incident", "atlantic"], ["remember", "mother", "bringing", "nail", "polish", "remover", "beach", "clean", "tar", "balls", "legs"]] | [["NN", "VBN", "IN", "JJS", "VBG", "MD", "RB", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "JJS", "NNS"], ["VBD", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["UH", "NNP", "JJR"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"]] | lobbyist published without least asking wo n't also lobby true best practices. learned gulf go wrong. well atlantic stormier. new technology exists quickly contain spill. late 1950s oil tanker incident atlantic. remember mother bringing nail polish remover beach clean tar balls legs | ["oil", "lobbyist"] | oil lobbyist | 1 | 0 |
Terry McKenna | Why was this lobbyist published without at least asking them we they won't also lobby for true best practices. We learned in the gulf what can go wrong. Well the Atlantic is stormier. So what new technology exists to quickly contain a spill? In the late 1950s there was an oil tanker incident in the Atlantic. All I remember about it is my mother bringing nail polish remover to the beach to clean off the tar balls from our legs. | the atlantic coast | A1363-P | oil spills | 0 | 3 | 7,723 | 14,166,293 | [["lobbyist", "published", "without", "least", "asking", "wo", "n't", "also", "lobby", "true", "best", "practices"], ["learned", "gulf", "go", "wrong"], ["well", "atlantic", "stormier"], ["new", "technology", "exists", "quickly", "contain", "spill"], ["late", "1950s", "oil", "tanker", "incident", "atlantic"], ["remember", "mother", "bringing", "nail", "polish", "remover", "beach", "clean", "tar", "balls", "legs"]] | [["NN", "VBN", "IN", "JJS", "VBG", "MD", "RB", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "JJS", "NNS"], ["VBD", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["UH", "NNP", "JJR"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"]] | lobbyist published without least asking wo n't also lobby true best practices. learned gulf go wrong. well atlantic stormier. new technology exists quickly contain spill. late 1950s oil tanker incident atlantic. remember mother bringing nail polish remover beach clean tar balls legs | ["oil", "spill"] | oil spill | 1 | 0 |
Terry McKenna | Why was this lobbyist published without at least asking them we they won't also lobby for true best practices. We learned in the gulf what can go wrong. Well the Atlantic is stormier. So what new technology exists to quickly contain a spill? In the late 1950s there was an oil tanker incident in the Atlantic. All I remember about it is my mother bringing nail polish remover to the beach to clean off the tar balls from our legs. | drilling | A1364-P | drilling | 0 | 1 | 10,686 | 14,166,293 | [["lobbyist", "published", "without", "least", "asking", "wo", "n't", "also", "lobby", "true", "best", "practices"], ["learned", "gulf", "go", "wrong"], ["well", "atlantic", "stormier"], ["new", "technology", "exists", "quickly", "contain", "spill"], ["late", "1950s", "oil", "tanker", "incident", "atlantic"], ["remember", "mother", "bringing", "nail", "polish", "remover", "beach", "clean", "tar", "balls", "legs"]] | [["NN", "VBN", "IN", "JJS", "VBG", "MD", "RB", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "JJS", "NNS"], ["VBD", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["UH", "NNP", "JJR"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"]] | lobbyist published without least asking wo n't also lobby true best practices. learned gulf go wrong. well atlantic stormier. new technology exists quickly contain spill. late 1950s oil tanker incident atlantic. remember mother bringing nail polish remover beach clean tar balls legs | ["drilling"] | drilling | 1 | 0 |
Terry McKenna | Why was this lobbyist published without at least asking them we they won't also lobby for true best practices. We learned in the gulf what can go wrong. Well the Atlantic is stormier. So what new technology exists to quickly contain a spill? In the late 1950s there was an oil tanker incident in the Atlantic. All I remember about it is my mother bringing nail polish remover to the beach to clean off the tar balls from our legs. | drilling | A1364-P | lobbyist | 0 | 3 | 10,687 | 14,166,293 | [["lobbyist", "published", "without", "least", "asking", "wo", "n't", "also", "lobby", "true", "best", "practices"], ["learned", "gulf", "go", "wrong"], ["well", "atlantic", "stormier"], ["new", "technology", "exists", "quickly", "contain", "spill"], ["late", "1950s", "oil", "tanker", "incident", "atlantic"], ["remember", "mother", "bringing", "nail", "polish", "remover", "beach", "clean", "tar", "balls", "legs"]] | [["NN", "VBN", "IN", "JJS", "VBG", "MD", "RB", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "JJS", "NNS"], ["VBD", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["UH", "NNP", "JJR"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VB", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBP", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"]] | lobbyist published without least asking wo n't also lobby true best practices. learned gulf go wrong. well atlantic stormier. new technology exists quickly contain spill. late 1950s oil tanker incident atlantic. remember mother bringing nail polish remover beach clean tar balls legs | ["lobbyist"] | lobbyist | 1 | 1 |
Dave | I find this a stunning essay. The large banks were teetering on the edge of complete collapse just 5-6 years ago. And he's calling these same banks the best run businesses on the planet? Well if I started a business and got huge Federal bailouts when I was at risk of going out of business, I'd do really well too. In my view, the banks should have been allowed to fail for their reckless behavior. | big banks | A1431-P | big banks | 0 | 1 | 11,854 | 10,946,842 | [["find", "stunning", "essay"], ["large", "banks", "teetering", "edge", "complete", "collapse", "5", "6", "years", "ago"], ["'s", "calling", "banks", "best", "run", "businesses", "planet"], ["well", "started", "business", "got", "huge", "federal", "bailouts", "risk", "going", "business", "'d", "really", "well"], ["view", "banks", "allowed", "fail", "reckless", "behavior"]] | [["VBP", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "RB"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NNS", "JJS", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["UH", "VBD", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "MD", "RB", "RB"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | find stunning essay. large banks teetering edge complete collapse 5 6 years ago. 's calling banks best run businesses planet. well started business got huge federal bailouts risk going business 'd really well. view banks allowed fail reckless behavior | ["big", "bank"] | big bank | 1 | 0 |
Dave | I find this a stunning essay. The large banks were teetering on the edge of complete collapse just 5-6 years ago. And he's calling these same banks the best run businesses on the planet? Well if I started a business and got huge Federal bailouts when I was at risk of going out of business, I'd do really well too. In my view, the banks should have been allowed to fail for their reckless behavior. | big banks | A1431-P | large banks | 0 | 3 | 11,855 | 10,946,842 | [["find", "stunning", "essay"], ["large", "banks", "teetering", "edge", "complete", "collapse", "5", "6", "years", "ago"], ["'s", "calling", "banks", "best", "run", "businesses", "planet"], ["well", "started", "business", "got", "huge", "federal", "bailouts", "risk", "going", "business", "'d", "really", "well"], ["view", "banks", "allowed", "fail", "reckless", "behavior"]] | [["VBP", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "RB"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NNS", "JJS", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["UH", "VBD", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "MD", "RB", "RB"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | find stunning essay. large banks teetering edge complete collapse 5 6 years ago. 's calling banks best run businesses planet. well started business got huge federal bailouts risk going business 'd really well. view banks allowed fail reckless behavior | ["large", "bank"] | large bank | 1 | 1 |
Dave | I find this a stunning essay. The large banks were teetering on the edge of complete collapse just 5-6 years ago. And he's calling these same banks the best run businesses on the planet? Well if I started a business and got huge Federal bailouts when I was at risk of going out of business, I'd do really well too. In my view, the banks should have been allowed to fail for their reckless behavior. | big banks | A1431-P | federal bailout for banks | 0 | 3 | 11,856 | 10,946,842 | [["find", "stunning", "essay"], ["large", "banks", "teetering", "edge", "complete", "collapse", "5", "6", "years", "ago"], ["'s", "calling", "banks", "best", "run", "businesses", "planet"], ["well", "started", "business", "got", "huge", "federal", "bailouts", "risk", "going", "business", "'d", "really", "well"], ["view", "banks", "allowed", "fail", "reckless", "behavior"]] | [["VBP", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "RB"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NNS", "JJS", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["UH", "VBD", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "MD", "RB", "RB"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | find stunning essay. large banks teetering edge complete collapse 5 6 years ago. 's calling banks best run businesses planet. well started business got huge federal bailouts risk going business 'd really well. view banks allowed fail reckless behavior | ["federal", "bailout", "bank"] | federal bailout bank | 1 | 0 |
Dave | I find this a stunning essay. The large banks were teetering on the edge of complete collapse just 5-6 years ago. And he's calling these same banks the best run businesses on the planet? Well if I started a business and got huge Federal bailouts when I was at risk of going out of business, I'd do really well too. In my view, the banks should have been allowed to fail for their reckless behavior. | big banks | A1431-P | government bailout for banks | 0 | 2 | 11,857 | 10,946,842 | [["find", "stunning", "essay"], ["large", "banks", "teetering", "edge", "complete", "collapse", "5", "6", "years", "ago"], ["'s", "calling", "banks", "best", "run", "businesses", "planet"], ["well", "started", "business", "got", "huge", "federal", "bailouts", "risk", "going", "business", "'d", "really", "well"], ["view", "banks", "allowed", "fail", "reckless", "behavior"]] | [["VBP", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "RB"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NNS", "JJS", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["UH", "VBD", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "MD", "RB", "RB"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | find stunning essay. large banks teetering edge complete collapse 5 6 years ago. 's calling banks best run businesses planet. well started business got huge federal bailouts risk going business 'd really well. view banks allowed fail reckless behavior | ["government", "bailout", "bank"] | government bailout bank | 1 | 0 |
Dave | I find this a stunning essay. The large banks were teetering on the edge of complete collapse just 5-6 years ago. And he's calling these same banks the best run businesses on the planet? Well if I started a business and got huge Federal bailouts when I was at risk of going out of business, I'd do really well too. In my view, the banks should have been allowed to fail for their reckless behavior. | big banks | A1431-P | bank bailout | 0 | 3 | 11,858 | 10,946,842 | [["find", "stunning", "essay"], ["large", "banks", "teetering", "edge", "complete", "collapse", "5", "6", "years", "ago"], ["'s", "calling", "banks", "best", "run", "businesses", "planet"], ["well", "started", "business", "got", "huge", "federal", "bailouts", "risk", "going", "business", "'d", "really", "well"], ["view", "banks", "allowed", "fail", "reckless", "behavior"]] | [["VBP", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "RB"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NNS", "JJS", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["UH", "VBD", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "MD", "RB", "RB"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | find stunning essay. large banks teetering edge complete collapse 5 6 years ago. 's calling banks best run businesses planet. well started business got huge federal bailouts risk going business 'd really well. view banks allowed fail reckless behavior | ["bank", "bailout"] | bank bailout | 1 | 0 |
Dave | I find this a stunning essay. The large banks were teetering on the edge of complete collapse just 5-6 years ago. And he's calling these same banks the best run businesses on the planet? Well if I started a business and got huge Federal bailouts when I was at risk of going out of business, I'd do really well too. In my view, the banks should have been allowed to fail for their reckless behavior. | control | A1432-P | control | 0 | 1 | 11,859 | 10,946,842 | [["find", "stunning", "essay"], ["large", "banks", "teetering", "edge", "complete", "collapse", "5", "6", "years", "ago"], ["'s", "calling", "banks", "best", "run", "businesses", "planet"], ["well", "started", "business", "got", "huge", "federal", "bailouts", "risk", "going", "business", "'d", "really", "well"], ["view", "banks", "allowed", "fail", "reckless", "behavior"]] | [["VBP", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "RB"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NNS", "JJS", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["UH", "VBD", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "MD", "RB", "RB"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | find stunning essay. large banks teetering edge complete collapse 5 6 years ago. 's calling banks best run businesses planet. well started business got huge federal bailouts risk going business 'd really well. view banks allowed fail reckless behavior | ["control"] | control | 1 | 0 |
Dave | I find this a stunning essay. The large banks were teetering on the edge of complete collapse just 5-6 years ago. And he's calling these same banks the best run businesses on the planet? Well if I started a business and got huge Federal bailouts when I was at risk of going out of business, I'd do really well too. In my view, the banks should have been allowed to fail for their reckless behavior. | control | A1432-P | federal bailouts | 0 | 3 | 11,860 | 10,946,842 | [["find", "stunning", "essay"], ["large", "banks", "teetering", "edge", "complete", "collapse", "5", "6", "years", "ago"], ["'s", "calling", "banks", "best", "run", "businesses", "planet"], ["well", "started", "business", "got", "huge", "federal", "bailouts", "risk", "going", "business", "'d", "really", "well"], ["view", "banks", "allowed", "fail", "reckless", "behavior"]] | [["VBP", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "RB"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NNS", "JJS", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["UH", "VBD", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "MD", "RB", "RB"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | find stunning essay. large banks teetering edge complete collapse 5 6 years ago. 's calling banks best run businesses planet. well started business got huge federal bailouts risk going business 'd really well. view banks allowed fail reckless behavior | ["federal", "bailouts"] | federal bailouts | 1 | 1 |
Dave | I find this a stunning essay. The large banks were teetering on the edge of complete collapse just 5-6 years ago. And he's calling these same banks the best run businesses on the planet? Well if I started a business and got huge Federal bailouts when I was at risk of going out of business, I'd do really well too. In my view, the banks should have been allowed to fail for their reckless behavior. | control | A1432-P | essay | 0 | 3 | 11,861 | 10,946,842 | [["find", "stunning", "essay"], ["large", "banks", "teetering", "edge", "complete", "collapse", "5", "6", "years", "ago"], ["'s", "calling", "banks", "best", "run", "businesses", "planet"], ["well", "started", "business", "got", "huge", "federal", "bailouts", "risk", "going", "business", "'d", "really", "well"], ["view", "banks", "allowed", "fail", "reckless", "behavior"]] | [["VBP", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "CD", "NNS", "RB"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NNS", "JJS", "NN", "NNS", "NN"], ["UH", "VBD", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "MD", "RB", "RB"], ["NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | find stunning essay. large banks teetering edge complete collapse 5 6 years ago. 's calling banks best run businesses planet. well started business got huge federal bailouts risk going business 'd really well. view banks allowed fail reckless behavior | ["essay"] | essay | 1 | 1 |
pat | I'm not well educated, and I have, as yet, to speak to anyone who pays a 13.9 percent federal tax on their income. Whats worse, to my thinking is that people I know well enough to ask aren't that interested that someone else does. That disinterest, as far as I can see, represents an attitude less of ambivalence, than the far more worrisome kind...resignation. As any investment, compared to any other investment, will likely reflect as much on means as intentions, it might serve to consider that a tax policy that fosters, for lack of a better word ...hording ..might just run counter to the thinking of those of us who think that economic development and refinement are to be preferred to, perhaps...oh... atavism. | capital gains | A2215-P | capital gains | 0 | 1 | 7,823 | 6,891,806 | [["'m", "well", "educated", "yet", "speak", "anyone", "pays", "13.9", "percent", "federal", "tax", "income"], ["worse", "thinking", "people", "know", "well", "enough", "ask", "n't", "interested", "someone", "else"], ["disinterest", "far", "see", "represents", "attitude", "less", "ambivalence", "far", "worrisome", "kind", "...", "resignation"], ["investment", "compared", "investment", "likely", "reflect", "much", "means", "intentions", "might", "serve", "consider", "tax", "policy", "fosters", "lack", "better", "word", "...", "hording", "..", "might", "run", "counter", "thinking", "us", "think", "economic", "development", "refinement", "preferred", "perhaps", "...", "oh", "...", "atavism"]] | [["VBP", "RB", "VBN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "CD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["JJR", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB"], ["JJS", "RB", "VB", "VBZ", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NFP", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "RB", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "NFP", "VBG", "NFP", "MD", "VB", "RB", "NN", "PRP", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "RB", ":", "UH", "NFP", "NN"]] | 'm well educated yet speak anyone pays 13.9 percent federal tax income. worse thinking people know well enough ask n't interested someone else. disinterest far see represents attitude less ambivalence far worrisome kind ... resignation. investment compared investment likely reflect much means intentions might serve consider tax policy fosters lack better word ... hording .. might run counter thinking us think economic development refinement preferred perhaps ... oh ... atavism | ["capital", "gain"] | capital gain | 1 | 0 |
pat | I'm not well educated, and I have, as yet, to speak to anyone who pays a 13.9 percent federal tax on their income. Whats worse, to my thinking is that people I know well enough to ask aren't that interested that someone else does. That disinterest, as far as I can see, represents an attitude less of ambivalence, than the far more worrisome kind...resignation. As any investment, compared to any other investment, will likely reflect as much on means as intentions, it might serve to consider that a tax policy that fosters, for lack of a better word ...hording ..might just run counter to the thinking of those of us who think that economic development and refinement are to be preferred to, perhaps...oh... atavism. | capital gains | A2215-P | tax | 0 | 3 | 7,824 | 6,891,806 | [["'m", "well", "educated", "yet", "speak", "anyone", "pays", "13.9", "percent", "federal", "tax", "income"], ["worse", "thinking", "people", "know", "well", "enough", "ask", "n't", "interested", "someone", "else"], ["disinterest", "far", "see", "represents", "attitude", "less", "ambivalence", "far", "worrisome", "kind", "...", "resignation"], ["investment", "compared", "investment", "likely", "reflect", "much", "means", "intentions", "might", "serve", "consider", "tax", "policy", "fosters", "lack", "better", "word", "...", "hording", "..", "might", "run", "counter", "thinking", "us", "think", "economic", "development", "refinement", "preferred", "perhaps", "...", "oh", "...", "atavism"]] | [["VBP", "RB", "VBN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "CD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["JJR", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB"], ["JJS", "RB", "VB", "VBZ", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NFP", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "RB", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "NFP", "VBG", "NFP", "MD", "VB", "RB", "NN", "PRP", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "RB", ":", "UH", "NFP", "NN"]] | 'm well educated yet speak anyone pays 13.9 percent federal tax income. worse thinking people know well enough ask n't interested someone else. disinterest far see represents attitude less ambivalence far worrisome kind ... resignation. investment compared investment likely reflect much means intentions might serve consider tax policy fosters lack better word ... hording .. might run counter thinking us think economic development refinement preferred perhaps ... oh ... atavism | ["tax"] | tax | 1 | 1 |
pat | I'm not well educated, and I have, as yet, to speak to anyone who pays a 13.9 percent federal tax on their income. Whats worse, to my thinking is that people I know well enough to ask aren't that interested that someone else does. That disinterest, as far as I can see, represents an attitude less of ambivalence, than the far more worrisome kind...resignation. As any investment, compared to any other investment, will likely reflect as much on means as intentions, it might serve to consider that a tax policy that fosters, for lack of a better word ...hording ..might just run counter to the thinking of those of us who think that economic development and refinement are to be preferred to, perhaps...oh... atavism. | capital gains | A2215-P | federal taxs | 1 | 3 | 7,825 | 6,891,806 | [["'m", "well", "educated", "yet", "speak", "anyone", "pays", "13.9", "percent", "federal", "tax", "income"], ["worse", "thinking", "people", "know", "well", "enough", "ask", "n't", "interested", "someone", "else"], ["disinterest", "far", "see", "represents", "attitude", "less", "ambivalence", "far", "worrisome", "kind", "...", "resignation"], ["investment", "compared", "investment", "likely", "reflect", "much", "means", "intentions", "might", "serve", "consider", "tax", "policy", "fosters", "lack", "better", "word", "...", "hording", "..", "might", "run", "counter", "thinking", "us", "think", "economic", "development", "refinement", "preferred", "perhaps", "...", "oh", "...", "atavism"]] | [["VBP", "RB", "VBN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "CD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["JJR", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB"], ["JJS", "RB", "VB", "VBZ", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NFP", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "RB", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "NFP", "VBG", "NFP", "MD", "VB", "RB", "NN", "PRP", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "RB", ":", "UH", "NFP", "NN"]] | 'm well educated yet speak anyone pays 13.9 percent federal tax income. worse thinking people know well enough ask n't interested someone else. disinterest far see represents attitude less ambivalence far worrisome kind ... resignation. investment compared investment likely reflect much means intentions might serve consider tax policy fosters lack better word ... hording .. might run counter thinking us think economic development refinement preferred perhaps ... oh ... atavism | ["federal", "tax"] | federal tax | 1 | 1 |
pat | I'm not well educated, and I have, as yet, to speak to anyone who pays a 13.9 percent federal tax on their income. Whats worse, to my thinking is that people I know well enough to ask aren't that interested that someone else does. That disinterest, as far as I can see, represents an attitude less of ambivalence, than the far more worrisome kind...resignation. As any investment, compared to any other investment, will likely reflect as much on means as intentions, it might serve to consider that a tax policy that fosters, for lack of a better word ...hording ..might just run counter to the thinking of those of us who think that economic development and refinement are to be preferred to, perhaps...oh... atavism. | capital gains | A2215-P | tax rates | 2 | 2 | 7,826 | 6,891,806 | [["'m", "well", "educated", "yet", "speak", "anyone", "pays", "13.9", "percent", "federal", "tax", "income"], ["worse", "thinking", "people", "know", "well", "enough", "ask", "n't", "interested", "someone", "else"], ["disinterest", "far", "see", "represents", "attitude", "less", "ambivalence", "far", "worrisome", "kind", "...", "resignation"], ["investment", "compared", "investment", "likely", "reflect", "much", "means", "intentions", "might", "serve", "consider", "tax", "policy", "fosters", "lack", "better", "word", "...", "hording", "..", "might", "run", "counter", "thinking", "us", "think", "economic", "development", "refinement", "preferred", "perhaps", "...", "oh", "...", "atavism"]] | [["VBP", "RB", "VBN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "CD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["JJR", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB"], ["JJS", "RB", "VB", "VBZ", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NFP", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "RB", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "NFP", "VBG", "NFP", "MD", "VB", "RB", "NN", "PRP", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "RB", ":", "UH", "NFP", "NN"]] | 'm well educated yet speak anyone pays 13.9 percent federal tax income. worse thinking people know well enough ask n't interested someone else. disinterest far see represents attitude less ambivalence far worrisome kind ... resignation. investment compared investment likely reflect much means intentions might serve consider tax policy fosters lack better word ... hording .. might run counter thinking us think economic development refinement preferred perhaps ... oh ... atavism | ["tax", "rate"] | tax rate | 1 | 0 |
pat | I'm not well educated, and I have, as yet, to speak to anyone who pays a 13.9 percent federal tax on their income. Whats worse, to my thinking is that people I know well enough to ask aren't that interested that someone else does. That disinterest, as far as I can see, represents an attitude less of ambivalence, than the far more worrisome kind...resignation. As any investment, compared to any other investment, will likely reflect as much on means as intentions, it might serve to consider that a tax policy that fosters, for lack of a better word ...hording ..might just run counter to the thinking of those of us who think that economic development and refinement are to be preferred to, perhaps...oh... atavism. | capital gains | A2215-P | investment | 2 | 3 | 7,827 | 6,891,806 | [["'m", "well", "educated", "yet", "speak", "anyone", "pays", "13.9", "percent", "federal", "tax", "income"], ["worse", "thinking", "people", "know", "well", "enough", "ask", "n't", "interested", "someone", "else"], ["disinterest", "far", "see", "represents", "attitude", "less", "ambivalence", "far", "worrisome", "kind", "...", "resignation"], ["investment", "compared", "investment", "likely", "reflect", "much", "means", "intentions", "might", "serve", "consider", "tax", "policy", "fosters", "lack", "better", "word", "...", "hording", "..", "might", "run", "counter", "thinking", "us", "think", "economic", "development", "refinement", "preferred", "perhaps", "...", "oh", "...", "atavism"]] | [["VBP", "RB", "VBN", "RB", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "CD", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["JJR", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "RB"], ["JJS", "RB", "VB", "VBZ", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "NFP", "NN"], ["NN", "VBN", "NN", "RB", "VB", "RB", "NNS", "NNS", "MD", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "JJR", "NN", "NFP", "VBG", "NFP", "MD", "VB", "RB", "NN", "PRP", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "RB", ":", "UH", "NFP", "NN"]] | 'm well educated yet speak anyone pays 13.9 percent federal tax income. worse thinking people know well enough ask n't interested someone else. disinterest far see represents attitude less ambivalence far worrisome kind ... resignation. investment compared investment likely reflect much means intentions might serve consider tax policy fosters lack better word ... hording .. might run counter thinking us think economic development refinement preferred perhaps ... oh ... atavism | ["investment"] | investment | 1 | 1 |
Cbad | I'm guessing electric cars will take off when someone comes up with a $200 portable solar-powered (or wind) recharger that can be wheeled out of the garage and top off the battery OFF THE GRID. Otherwise, you're adding $2,000 to your annual electric bill. Same goes for home solar... It has to be sold for a few hundred bucks at Home Deport and not take up your entire back yard. | electric cars | A3898-P | electric cars | 0 | 1 | 9,808 | 2,656,554 | [["'m", "guessing", "electric", "cars", "take", "someone", "comes", "200", "portable", "solar", "powered", "wind", "recharger", "wheeled", "garage", "top", "battery", "grid"], ["otherwise", "'re", "adding", "2,000", "annual", "electric", "bill"], ["goes", "home", "solar", "..."], ["sold", "hundred", "bucks", "home", "deport", "take", "entire", "back", "yard"]] | [["VBP", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["RB", "VBP", "VBG", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBZ", "NN", "JJ", "."], ["VBN", "CD", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]] | 'm guessing electric cars take someone comes 200 portable solar powered wind recharger wheeled garage top battery grid. otherwise 're adding 2,000 annual electric bill. goes home solar .... sold hundred bucks home deport take entire back yard | ["electric", "car"] | electric car | 1 | 1 |
Cbad | I'm guessing electric cars will take off when someone comes up with a $200 portable solar-powered (or wind) recharger that can be wheeled out of the garage and top off the battery OFF THE GRID. Otherwise, you're adding $2,000 to your annual electric bill. Same goes for home solar... It has to be sold for a few hundred bucks at Home Deport and not take up your entire back yard. | electric cars | A3898-P | reducing electric-car charging bill | 0 | 3 | 9,809 | 2,656,554 | [["'m", "guessing", "electric", "cars", "take", "someone", "comes", "200", "portable", "solar", "powered", "wind", "recharger", "wheeled", "garage", "top", "battery", "grid"], ["otherwise", "'re", "adding", "2,000", "annual", "electric", "bill"], ["goes", "home", "solar", "..."], ["sold", "hundred", "bucks", "home", "deport", "take", "entire", "back", "yard"]] | [["VBP", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["RB", "VBP", "VBG", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBZ", "NN", "JJ", "."], ["VBN", "CD", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]] | 'm guessing electric cars take someone comes 200 portable solar powered wind recharger wheeled garage top battery grid. otherwise 're adding 2,000 annual electric bill. goes home solar .... sold hundred bucks home deport take entire back yard | ["reducing", "electric", "car", "charging", "bill"] | reducing electric car charging bill | 1 | 0 |
Cbad | I'm guessing electric cars will take off when someone comes up with a $200 portable solar-powered (or wind) recharger that can be wheeled out of the garage and top off the battery OFF THE GRID. Otherwise, you're adding $2,000 to your annual electric bill. Same goes for home solar... It has to be sold for a few hundred bucks at Home Deport and not take up your entire back yard. | electric cars | A3898-P | electric cars | 0 | 3 | 9,810 | 2,656,554 | [["'m", "guessing", "electric", "cars", "take", "someone", "comes", "200", "portable", "solar", "powered", "wind", "recharger", "wheeled", "garage", "top", "battery", "grid"], ["otherwise", "'re", "adding", "2,000", "annual", "electric", "bill"], ["goes", "home", "solar", "..."], ["sold", "hundred", "bucks", "home", "deport", "take", "entire", "back", "yard"]] | [["VBP", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["RB", "VBP", "VBG", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBZ", "NN", "JJ", "."], ["VBN", "CD", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]] | 'm guessing electric cars take someone comes 200 portable solar powered wind recharger wheeled garage top battery grid. otherwise 're adding 2,000 annual electric bill. goes home solar .... sold hundred bucks home deport take entire back yard | ["electric", "car"] | electric car | 1 | 1 |
PS | How about tax credits for those who don't even have children in the first place? My tax money pays for the education of other people's children since we don't, won't, and didn't have children to begin with! My only, very tiny consolation is that a well educated populace is in everyone's best interests....if only! | home schoolers | A5207-P | home schoolers | 1 | 1 | 159 | 3,172,652 | [["tax", "credits", "n't", "even", "children", "first", "place"], ["tax", "money", "pays", "education", "people", "'s", "children", "since", "n't", "wo", "n't", "n't", "children", "begin"], ["tiny", "consolation", "well", "educated", "populace", "everyone", "'s", "best", "interests", "...."]] | [["NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "POS", "NNS", "IN", "RB", "MD", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "JJS", "NNS", "NFP"]] | tax credits n't even children first place. tax money pays education people 's children since n't wo n't n't children begin. tiny consolation well educated populace everyone 's best interests .... | ["home", "schoolers"] | home schoolers | 1 | 0 |
PS | How about tax credits for those who don't even have children in the first place? My tax money pays for the education of other people's children since we don't, won't, and didn't have children to begin with! My only, very tiny consolation is that a well educated populace is in everyone's best interests....if only! | home schoolers | A5207-P | child | 1 | 3 | 160 | 3,172,652 | [["tax", "credits", "n't", "even", "children", "first", "place"], ["tax", "money", "pays", "education", "people", "'s", "children", "since", "n't", "wo", "n't", "n't", "children", "begin"], ["tiny", "consolation", "well", "educated", "populace", "everyone", "'s", "best", "interests", "...."]] | [["NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "POS", "NNS", "IN", "RB", "MD", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "JJS", "NNS", "NFP"]] | tax credits n't even children first place. tax money pays education people 's children since n't wo n't n't children begin. tiny consolation well educated populace everyone 's best interests .... | ["child"] | child | 1 | 1 |
PS | How about tax credits for those who don't even have children in the first place? My tax money pays for the education of other people's children since we don't, won't, and didn't have children to begin with! My only, very tiny consolation is that a well educated populace is in everyone's best interests....if only! | home schoolers | A5207-P | tax for education | 1 | 3 | 161 | 3,172,652 | [["tax", "credits", "n't", "even", "children", "first", "place"], ["tax", "money", "pays", "education", "people", "'s", "children", "since", "n't", "wo", "n't", "n't", "children", "begin"], ["tiny", "consolation", "well", "educated", "populace", "everyone", "'s", "best", "interests", "...."]] | [["NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "POS", "NNS", "IN", "RB", "MD", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "JJS", "NNS", "NFP"]] | tax credits n't even children first place. tax money pays education people 's children since n't wo n't n't children begin. tiny consolation well educated populace everyone 's best interests .... | ["tax", "education"] | tax education | 1 | 0 |
PS | How about tax credits for those who don't even have children in the first place? My tax money pays for the education of other people's children since we don't, won't, and didn't have children to begin with! My only, very tiny consolation is that a well educated populace is in everyone's best interests....if only! | home schoolers | A5207-P | public education | 2 | 2 | 162 | 3,172,652 | [["tax", "credits", "n't", "even", "children", "first", "place"], ["tax", "money", "pays", "education", "people", "'s", "children", "since", "n't", "wo", "n't", "n't", "children", "begin"], ["tiny", "consolation", "well", "educated", "populace", "everyone", "'s", "best", "interests", "...."]] | [["NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "POS", "NNS", "IN", "RB", "MD", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "JJS", "NNS", "NFP"]] | tax credits n't even children first place. tax money pays education people 's children since n't wo n't n't children begin. tiny consolation well educated populace everyone 's best interests .... | ["public", "education"] | public education | 1 | 0 |
PS | How about tax credits for those who don't even have children in the first place? My tax money pays for the education of other people's children since we don't, won't, and didn't have children to begin with! My only, very tiny consolation is that a well educated populace is in everyone's best interests....if only! | home schoolers | A5207-P | tax credits | 2 | 3 | 163 | 3,172,652 | [["tax", "credits", "n't", "even", "children", "first", "place"], ["tax", "money", "pays", "education", "people", "'s", "children", "since", "n't", "wo", "n't", "n't", "children", "begin"], ["tiny", "consolation", "well", "educated", "populace", "everyone", "'s", "best", "interests", "...."]] | [["NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "POS", "NNS", "IN", "RB", "MD", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "JJS", "NNS", "NFP"]] | tax credits n't even children first place. tax money pays education people 's children since n't wo n't n't children begin. tiny consolation well educated populace everyone 's best interests .... | ["tax", "credit"] | tax credit | 1 | 1 |
PS | How about tax credits for those who don't even have children in the first place? My tax money pays for the education of other people's children since we don't, won't, and didn't have children to begin with! My only, very tiny consolation is that a well educated populace is in everyone's best interests....if only! | a tax break | A5208-P | a tax break | 1 | 1 | 1,647 | 3,172,652 | [["tax", "credits", "n't", "even", "children", "first", "place"], ["tax", "money", "pays", "education", "people", "'s", "children", "since", "n't", "wo", "n't", "n't", "children", "begin"], ["tiny", "consolation", "well", "educated", "populace", "everyone", "'s", "best", "interests", "...."]] | [["NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "POS", "NNS", "IN", "RB", "MD", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "JJS", "NNS", "NFP"]] | tax credits n't even children first place. tax money pays education people 's children since n't wo n't n't children begin. tiny consolation well educated populace everyone 's best interests .... | ["tax", "break"] | tax break | 1 | 0 |
PS | How about tax credits for those who don't even have children in the first place? My tax money pays for the education of other people's children since we don't, won't, and didn't have children to begin with! My only, very tiny consolation is that a well educated populace is in everyone's best interests....if only! | a tax break | A5208-P | tax credits for childless adults as a matter of justice | 1 | 3 | 1,648 | 3,172,652 | [["tax", "credits", "n't", "even", "children", "first", "place"], ["tax", "money", "pays", "education", "people", "'s", "children", "since", "n't", "wo", "n't", "n't", "children", "begin"], ["tiny", "consolation", "well", "educated", "populace", "everyone", "'s", "best", "interests", "...."]] | [["NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "POS", "NNS", "IN", "RB", "MD", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "JJS", "NNS", "NFP"]] | tax credits n't even children first place. tax money pays education people 's children since n't wo n't n't children begin. tiny consolation well educated populace everyone 's best interests .... | ["tax", "credit", "childless", "adult", "matter", "justice"] | tax credit childless adult matter justice | 1 | 0 |
PS | How about tax credits for those who don't even have children in the first place? My tax money pays for the education of other people's children since we don't, won't, and didn't have children to begin with! My only, very tiny consolation is that a well educated populace is in everyone's best interests....if only! | a tax break | A5208-P | tax credits | 0 | 2 | 1,649 | 3,172,652 | [["tax", "credits", "n't", "even", "children", "first", "place"], ["tax", "money", "pays", "education", "people", "'s", "children", "since", "n't", "wo", "n't", "n't", "children", "begin"], ["tiny", "consolation", "well", "educated", "populace", "everyone", "'s", "best", "interests", "...."]] | [["NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "POS", "NNS", "IN", "RB", "MD", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "JJS", "NNS", "NFP"]] | tax credits n't even children first place. tax money pays education people 's children since n't wo n't n't children begin. tiny consolation well educated populace everyone 's best interests .... | ["tax", "credit"] | tax credit | 1 | 1 |
PS | How about tax credits for those who don't even have children in the first place? My tax money pays for the education of other people's children since we don't, won't, and didn't have children to begin with! My only, very tiny consolation is that a well educated populace is in everyone's best interests....if only! | a tax break | A5208-P | having children | 0 | 3 | 1,650 | 3,172,652 | [["tax", "credits", "n't", "even", "children", "first", "place"], ["tax", "money", "pays", "education", "people", "'s", "children", "since", "n't", "wo", "n't", "n't", "children", "begin"], ["tiny", "consolation", "well", "educated", "populace", "everyone", "'s", "best", "interests", "...."]] | [["NN", "NNS", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "POS", "NNS", "IN", "RB", "MD", "RB", "RB", "NNS", "VB"], ["JJ", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "JJS", "NNS", "NFP"]] | tax credits n't even children first place. tax money pays education people 's children since n't wo n't n't children begin. tiny consolation well educated populace everyone 's best interests .... | ["child"] | child | 1 | 1 |
WmC | Most conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts: negative externalities generated by any given economic activity and opportunity costs. Mr. Cotti gives at least passing notice to the former, but shows no awareness of the latter. How many good, permanent jobs with career ladders could be created by investing in, say, a medical complex, a nursing home, a high-tech construction firm, or a solar panel manufacturing plant? Why not provide incentives to businesses that satisfy basic human needs rather than those that pander to humankind's worst instincts? | casinos | A3433-P | casinos | 0 | 1 | 6,803 | 10,225,964 | [["conservative", "economists", "blithely", "ignore", "two", "central", "economic", "facts", "negative", "externalities", "generated", "given", "economic", "activity", "opportunity", "costs"], ["mr.", "cotti", "gives", "least", "passing", "notice", "former", "shows", "awareness", "latter"], ["many", "good", "permanent", "jobs", "career", "ladders", "could", "created", "investing", "say", "medical", "complex", "nursing", "home", "high", "tech", "construction", "firm", "solar", "panel", "manufacturing", "plant"], ["provide", "incentives", "businesses", "satisfy", "basic", "human", "needs", "rather", "pander", "humankind", "'s", "worst", "instincts"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "JJ"], ["JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VBG", "UH", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "POS", "JJS", "NNS"]] | conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts negative externalities generated given economic activity opportunity costs. mr. cotti gives least passing notice former shows awareness latter. many good permanent jobs career ladders could created investing say medical complex nursing home high tech construction firm solar panel manufacturing plant. provide incentives businesses satisfy basic human needs rather pander humankind 's worst instincts | ["casino"] | casino | 1 | 0 |
WmC | Most conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts: negative externalities generated by any given economic activity and opportunity costs. Mr. Cotti gives at least passing notice to the former, but shows no awareness of the latter. How many good, permanent jobs with career ladders could be created by investing in, say, a medical complex, a nursing home, a high-tech construction firm, or a solar panel manufacturing plant? Why not provide incentives to businesses that satisfy basic human needs rather than those that pander to humankind's worst instincts? | casinos | A3433-P | economy | 0 | 3 | 6,804 | 10,225,964 | [["conservative", "economists", "blithely", "ignore", "two", "central", "economic", "facts", "negative", "externalities", "generated", "given", "economic", "activity", "opportunity", "costs"], ["mr.", "cotti", "gives", "least", "passing", "notice", "former", "shows", "awareness", "latter"], ["many", "good", "permanent", "jobs", "career", "ladders", "could", "created", "investing", "say", "medical", "complex", "nursing", "home", "high", "tech", "construction", "firm", "solar", "panel", "manufacturing", "plant"], ["provide", "incentives", "businesses", "satisfy", "basic", "human", "needs", "rather", "pander", "humankind", "'s", "worst", "instincts"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "JJ"], ["JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VBG", "UH", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "POS", "JJS", "NNS"]] | conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts negative externalities generated given economic activity opportunity costs. mr. cotti gives least passing notice former shows awareness latter. many good permanent jobs career ladders could created investing say medical complex nursing home high tech construction firm solar panel manufacturing plant. provide incentives businesses satisfy basic human needs rather pander humankind 's worst instincts | ["economy"] | economy | 1 | 0 |
WmC | Most conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts: negative externalities generated by any given economic activity and opportunity costs. Mr. Cotti gives at least passing notice to the former, but shows no awareness of the latter. How many good, permanent jobs with career ladders could be created by investing in, say, a medical complex, a nursing home, a high-tech construction firm, or a solar panel manufacturing plant? Why not provide incentives to businesses that satisfy basic human needs rather than those that pander to humankind's worst instincts? | casinos | A3433-P | government investment in jobs programs | 1 | 2 | 6,805 | 10,225,964 | [["conservative", "economists", "blithely", "ignore", "two", "central", "economic", "facts", "negative", "externalities", "generated", "given", "economic", "activity", "opportunity", "costs"], ["mr.", "cotti", "gives", "least", "passing", "notice", "former", "shows", "awareness", "latter"], ["many", "good", "permanent", "jobs", "career", "ladders", "could", "created", "investing", "say", "medical", "complex", "nursing", "home", "high", "tech", "construction", "firm", "solar", "panel", "manufacturing", "plant"], ["provide", "incentives", "businesses", "satisfy", "basic", "human", "needs", "rather", "pander", "humankind", "'s", "worst", "instincts"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "JJ"], ["JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VBG", "UH", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "POS", "JJS", "NNS"]] | conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts negative externalities generated given economic activity opportunity costs. mr. cotti gives least passing notice former shows awareness latter. many good permanent jobs career ladders could created investing say medical complex nursing home high tech construction firm solar panel manufacturing plant. provide incentives businesses satisfy basic human needs rather pander humankind 's worst instincts | ["government", "investment", "job", "program"] | government investment job program | 1 | 0 |
WmC | Most conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts: negative externalities generated by any given economic activity and opportunity costs. Mr. Cotti gives at least passing notice to the former, but shows no awareness of the latter. How many good, permanent jobs with career ladders could be created by investing in, say, a medical complex, a nursing home, a high-tech construction firm, or a solar panel manufacturing plant? Why not provide incentives to businesses that satisfy basic human needs rather than those that pander to humankind's worst instincts? | casinos | A3433-P | job creation | 1 | 2 | 6,806 | 10,225,964 | [["conservative", "economists", "blithely", "ignore", "two", "central", "economic", "facts", "negative", "externalities", "generated", "given", "economic", "activity", "opportunity", "costs"], ["mr.", "cotti", "gives", "least", "passing", "notice", "former", "shows", "awareness", "latter"], ["many", "good", "permanent", "jobs", "career", "ladders", "could", "created", "investing", "say", "medical", "complex", "nursing", "home", "high", "tech", "construction", "firm", "solar", "panel", "manufacturing", "plant"], ["provide", "incentives", "businesses", "satisfy", "basic", "human", "needs", "rather", "pander", "humankind", "'s", "worst", "instincts"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "JJ"], ["JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VBG", "UH", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "POS", "JJS", "NNS"]] | conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts negative externalities generated given economic activity opportunity costs. mr. cotti gives least passing notice former shows awareness latter. many good permanent jobs career ladders could created investing say medical complex nursing home high tech construction firm solar panel manufacturing plant. provide incentives businesses satisfy basic human needs rather pander humankind 's worst instincts | ["job", "creation"] | job creation | 1 | 0 |
WmC | Most conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts: negative externalities generated by any given economic activity and opportunity costs. Mr. Cotti gives at least passing notice to the former, but shows no awareness of the latter. How many good, permanent jobs with career ladders could be created by investing in, say, a medical complex, a nursing home, a high-tech construction firm, or a solar panel manufacturing plant? Why not provide incentives to businesses that satisfy basic human needs rather than those that pander to humankind's worst instincts? | casinos | A3433-P | capitalism | 1 | 3 | 6,807 | 10,225,964 | [["conservative", "economists", "blithely", "ignore", "two", "central", "economic", "facts", "negative", "externalities", "generated", "given", "economic", "activity", "opportunity", "costs"], ["mr.", "cotti", "gives", "least", "passing", "notice", "former", "shows", "awareness", "latter"], ["many", "good", "permanent", "jobs", "career", "ladders", "could", "created", "investing", "say", "medical", "complex", "nursing", "home", "high", "tech", "construction", "firm", "solar", "panel", "manufacturing", "plant"], ["provide", "incentives", "businesses", "satisfy", "basic", "human", "needs", "rather", "pander", "humankind", "'s", "worst", "instincts"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "JJ"], ["JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VBG", "UH", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "POS", "JJS", "NNS"]] | conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts negative externalities generated given economic activity opportunity costs. mr. cotti gives least passing notice former shows awareness latter. many good permanent jobs career ladders could created investing say medical complex nursing home high tech construction firm solar panel manufacturing plant. provide incentives businesses satisfy basic human needs rather pander humankind 's worst instincts | ["capitalism"] | capitalism | 1 | 0 |
WmC | Most conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts: negative externalities generated by any given economic activity and opportunity costs. Mr. Cotti gives at least passing notice to the former, but shows no awareness of the latter. How many good, permanent jobs with career ladders could be created by investing in, say, a medical complex, a nursing home, a high-tech construction firm, or a solar panel manufacturing plant? Why not provide incentives to businesses that satisfy basic human needs rather than those that pander to humankind's worst instincts? | casinos | A3433-P | humanity | 1 | 3 | 6,808 | 10,225,964 | [["conservative", "economists", "blithely", "ignore", "two", "central", "economic", "facts", "negative", "externalities", "generated", "given", "economic", "activity", "opportunity", "costs"], ["mr.", "cotti", "gives", "least", "passing", "notice", "former", "shows", "awareness", "latter"], ["many", "good", "permanent", "jobs", "career", "ladders", "could", "created", "investing", "say", "medical", "complex", "nursing", "home", "high", "tech", "construction", "firm", "solar", "panel", "manufacturing", "plant"], ["provide", "incentives", "businesses", "satisfy", "basic", "human", "needs", "rather", "pander", "humankind", "'s", "worst", "instincts"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "JJ"], ["JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VBG", "UH", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "POS", "JJS", "NNS"]] | conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts negative externalities generated given economic activity opportunity costs. mr. cotti gives least passing notice former shows awareness latter. many good permanent jobs career ladders could created investing say medical complex nursing home high tech construction firm solar panel manufacturing plant. provide incentives businesses satisfy basic human needs rather pander humankind 's worst instincts | ["humanity"] | humanity | 1 | 0 |
WmC | Most conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts: negative externalities generated by any given economic activity and opportunity costs. Mr. Cotti gives at least passing notice to the former, but shows no awareness of the latter. How many good, permanent jobs with career ladders could be created by investing in, say, a medical complex, a nursing home, a high-tech construction firm, or a solar panel manufacturing plant? Why not provide incentives to businesses that satisfy basic human needs rather than those that pander to humankind's worst instincts? | a gamble | A3434-P | a gamble | 0 | 1 | 17,769 | 10,225,964 | [["conservative", "economists", "blithely", "ignore", "two", "central", "economic", "facts", "negative", "externalities", "generated", "given", "economic", "activity", "opportunity", "costs"], ["mr.", "cotti", "gives", "least", "passing", "notice", "former", "shows", "awareness", "latter"], ["many", "good", "permanent", "jobs", "career", "ladders", "could", "created", "investing", "say", "medical", "complex", "nursing", "home", "high", "tech", "construction", "firm", "solar", "panel", "manufacturing", "plant"], ["provide", "incentives", "businesses", "satisfy", "basic", "human", "needs", "rather", "pander", "humankind", "'s", "worst", "instincts"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "JJ"], ["JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VBG", "UH", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "POS", "JJS", "NNS"]] | conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts negative externalities generated given economic activity opportunity costs. mr. cotti gives least passing notice former shows awareness latter. many good permanent jobs career ladders could created investing say medical complex nursing home high tech construction firm solar panel manufacturing plant. provide incentives businesses satisfy basic human needs rather pander humankind 's worst instincts | ["gamble"] | gamble | 1 | 0 |
WmC | Most conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts: negative externalities generated by any given economic activity and opportunity costs. Mr. Cotti gives at least passing notice to the former, but shows no awareness of the latter. How many good, permanent jobs with career ladders could be created by investing in, say, a medical complex, a nursing home, a high-tech construction firm, or a solar panel manufacturing plant? Why not provide incentives to businesses that satisfy basic human needs rather than those that pander to humankind's worst instincts? | a gamble | A3434-P | politics | 0 | 3 | 17,770 | 10,225,964 | [["conservative", "economists", "blithely", "ignore", "two", "central", "economic", "facts", "negative", "externalities", "generated", "given", "economic", "activity", "opportunity", "costs"], ["mr.", "cotti", "gives", "least", "passing", "notice", "former", "shows", "awareness", "latter"], ["many", "good", "permanent", "jobs", "career", "ladders", "could", "created", "investing", "say", "medical", "complex", "nursing", "home", "high", "tech", "construction", "firm", "solar", "panel", "manufacturing", "plant"], ["provide", "incentives", "businesses", "satisfy", "basic", "human", "needs", "rather", "pander", "humankind", "'s", "worst", "instincts"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "JJ"], ["JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VBG", "UH", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "POS", "JJS", "NNS"]] | conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts negative externalities generated given economic activity opportunity costs. mr. cotti gives least passing notice former shows awareness latter. many good permanent jobs career ladders could created investing say medical complex nursing home high tech construction firm solar panel manufacturing plant. provide incentives businesses satisfy basic human needs rather pander humankind 's worst instincts | ["politics"] | politics | 1 | 0 |
WmC | Most conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts: negative externalities generated by any given economic activity and opportunity costs. Mr. Cotti gives at least passing notice to the former, but shows no awareness of the latter. How many good, permanent jobs with career ladders could be created by investing in, say, a medical complex, a nursing home, a high-tech construction firm, or a solar panel manufacturing plant? Why not provide incentives to businesses that satisfy basic human needs rather than those that pander to humankind's worst instincts? | a gamble | A3434-P | economic activity | 1 | 3 | 17,771 | 10,225,964 | [["conservative", "economists", "blithely", "ignore", "two", "central", "economic", "facts", "negative", "externalities", "generated", "given", "economic", "activity", "opportunity", "costs"], ["mr.", "cotti", "gives", "least", "passing", "notice", "former", "shows", "awareness", "latter"], ["many", "good", "permanent", "jobs", "career", "ladders", "could", "created", "investing", "say", "medical", "complex", "nursing", "home", "high", "tech", "construction", "firm", "solar", "panel", "manufacturing", "plant"], ["provide", "incentives", "businesses", "satisfy", "basic", "human", "needs", "rather", "pander", "humankind", "'s", "worst", "instincts"]] | [["JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "VBN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJS", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "JJ"], ["JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "MD", "VBN", "VBG", "UH", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VB", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "POS", "JJS", "NNS"]] | conservative economists blithely ignore two central economic facts negative externalities generated given economic activity opportunity costs. mr. cotti gives least passing notice former shows awareness latter. many good permanent jobs career ladders could created investing say medical complex nursing home high tech construction firm solar panel manufacturing plant. provide incentives businesses satisfy basic human needs rather pander humankind 's worst instincts | ["economic", "activity"] | economic activity | 1 | 1 |
Caricoutur | I think the evidence shows that any change in the legal framework on prostitution leads to an increase in trafficking. For example, South Korea's tougher new prostitution laws saw an increase in women being trafficked - ouf of the country. | prostituion | A1057-P | prostituion | 0 | 1 | 4,522 | 6,039,863 | [["think", "evidence", "shows", "change", "legal", "framework", "prostitution", "leads", "increase", "trafficking"], ["example", "south", "korea", "'s", "tougher", "new", "prostitution", "laws", "saw", "increase", "women", "trafficked", "ouf", "country"]] | [["VBP", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "JJR", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"]] | think evidence shows change legal framework prostitution leads increase trafficking. example south korea 's tougher new prostitution laws saw increase women trafficked ouf country | ["prostitution"] | prostitution | 1 | 1 |
Caricoutur | I think the evidence shows that any change in the legal framework on prostitution leads to an increase in trafficking. For example, South Korea's tougher new prostitution laws saw an increase in women being trafficked - ouf of the country. | prostituion | A1057-P | prostituiont | 1 | 3 | 4,523 | 6,039,863 | [["think", "evidence", "shows", "change", "legal", "framework", "prostitution", "leads", "increase", "trafficking"], ["example", "south", "korea", "'s", "tougher", "new", "prostitution", "laws", "saw", "increase", "women", "trafficked", "ouf", "country"]] | [["VBP", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "JJR", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"]] | think evidence shows change legal framework prostitution leads increase trafficking. example south korea 's tougher new prostitution laws saw increase women trafficked ouf country | ["prostitution"] | prostitution | 1 | 1 |
Caricoutur | I think the evidence shows that any change in the legal framework on prostitution leads to an increase in trafficking. For example, South Korea's tougher new prostitution laws saw an increase in women being trafficked - ouf of the country. | prostituion | A1057-P | prostitution | 0 | 3 | 4,524 | 6,039,863 | [["think", "evidence", "shows", "change", "legal", "framework", "prostitution", "leads", "increase", "trafficking"], ["example", "south", "korea", "'s", "tougher", "new", "prostitution", "laws", "saw", "increase", "women", "trafficked", "ouf", "country"]] | [["VBP", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "JJR", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "VBD", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NN"]] | think evidence shows change legal framework prostitution leads increase trafficking. example south korea 's tougher new prostitution laws saw increase women trafficked ouf country | ["prostitution"] | prostitution | 1 | 1 |
Urizen | The fact that the newspaper of record can host a debate on the proposed expansion of off-shore drilling, with all we know about climate change, with the history of the BP disaster, should be all the proof anyone needs that we have a sick, greed-driven group of people making and reporting on our energy and economic policies. Unless the people rise up and challenge this insanity, people like Rob Whittman will see to it that we leave our children with a very bleak future. | drilling | A1372-P | drilling | 0 | 1 | 6,093 | 14,166,329 | [["fact", "newspaper", "record", "host", "debate", "proposed", "expansion", "shore", "drilling", "know", "climate", "change", "history", "bp", "disaster", "proof", "anyone", "needs", "sick", "greed", "driven", "group", "people", "making", "reporting", "energy", "economic", "policies"], ["unless", "people", "rise", "challenge", "insanity", "people", "like", "rob", "whittman", "see", "leave", "children", "bleak", "future"]] | [["NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "VBP", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"]] | fact newspaper record host debate proposed expansion shore drilling know climate change history bp disaster proof anyone needs sick greed driven group people making reporting energy economic policies. unless people rise challenge insanity people like rob whittman see leave children bleak future | ["drilling"] | drilling | 1 | 1 |
Urizen | The fact that the newspaper of record can host a debate on the proposed expansion of off-shore drilling, with all we know about climate change, with the history of the BP disaster, should be all the proof anyone needs that we have a sick, greed-driven group of people making and reporting on our energy and economic policies. Unless the people rise up and challenge this insanity, people like Rob Whittman will see to it that we leave our children with a very bleak future. | drilling | A1372-P | offshore dilling | 0 | 3 | 6,094 | 14,166,329 | [["fact", "newspaper", "record", "host", "debate", "proposed", "expansion", "shore", "drilling", "know", "climate", "change", "history", "bp", "disaster", "proof", "anyone", "needs", "sick", "greed", "driven", "group", "people", "making", "reporting", "energy", "economic", "policies"], ["unless", "people", "rise", "challenge", "insanity", "people", "like", "rob", "whittman", "see", "leave", "children", "bleak", "future"]] | [["NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "VBP", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"]] | fact newspaper record host debate proposed expansion shore drilling know climate change history bp disaster proof anyone needs sick greed driven group people making reporting energy economic policies. unless people rise challenge insanity people like rob whittman see leave children bleak future | ["offshore", "dilling"] | offshore dilling | 1 | 0 |
Urizen | The fact that the newspaper of record can host a debate on the proposed expansion of off-shore drilling, with all we know about climate change, with the history of the BP disaster, should be all the proof anyone needs that we have a sick, greed-driven group of people making and reporting on our energy and economic policies. Unless the people rise up and challenge this insanity, people like Rob Whittman will see to it that we leave our children with a very bleak future. | drilling | A1372-P | offshore drilling | 0 | 3 | 6,095 | 14,166,329 | [["fact", "newspaper", "record", "host", "debate", "proposed", "expansion", "shore", "drilling", "know", "climate", "change", "history", "bp", "disaster", "proof", "anyone", "needs", "sick", "greed", "driven", "group", "people", "making", "reporting", "energy", "economic", "policies"], ["unless", "people", "rise", "challenge", "insanity", "people", "like", "rob", "whittman", "see", "leave", "children", "bleak", "future"]] | [["NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "VBP", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"]] | fact newspaper record host debate proposed expansion shore drilling know climate change history bp disaster proof anyone needs sick greed driven group people making reporting energy economic policies. unless people rise challenge insanity people like rob whittman see leave children bleak future | ["offshore", "drilling"] | offshore drilling | 1 | 0 |
Urizen | The fact that the newspaper of record can host a debate on the proposed expansion of off-shore drilling, with all we know about climate change, with the history of the BP disaster, should be all the proof anyone needs that we have a sick, greed-driven group of people making and reporting on our energy and economic policies. Unless the people rise up and challenge this insanity, people like Rob Whittman will see to it that we leave our children with a very bleak future. | the atlantic coast | A1371-P | bp disaster | 2 | 2 | 16,851 | 14,166,329 | [["fact", "newspaper", "record", "host", "debate", "proposed", "expansion", "shore", "drilling", "know", "climate", "change", "history", "bp", "disaster", "proof", "anyone", "needs", "sick", "greed", "driven", "group", "people", "making", "reporting", "energy", "economic", "policies"], ["unless", "people", "rise", "challenge", "insanity", "people", "like", "rob", "whittman", "see", "leave", "children", "bleak", "future"]] | [["NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "VBP", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"]] | fact newspaper record host debate proposed expansion shore drilling know climate change history bp disaster proof anyone needs sick greed driven group people making reporting energy economic policies. unless people rise challenge insanity people like rob whittman see leave children bleak future | ["bp", "disaster"] | bp disaster | 1 | 1 |
Urizen | The fact that the newspaper of record can host a debate on the proposed expansion of off-shore drilling, with all we know about climate change, with the history of the BP disaster, should be all the proof anyone needs that we have a sick, greed-driven group of people making and reporting on our energy and economic policies. Unless the people rise up and challenge this insanity, people like Rob Whittman will see to it that we leave our children with a very bleak future. | the atlantic coast | A1371-P | the bp disaster | 0 | 2 | 16,852 | 14,166,329 | [["fact", "newspaper", "record", "host", "debate", "proposed", "expansion", "shore", "drilling", "know", "climate", "change", "history", "bp", "disaster", "proof", "anyone", "needs", "sick", "greed", "driven", "group", "people", "making", "reporting", "energy", "economic", "policies"], ["unless", "people", "rise", "challenge", "insanity", "people", "like", "rob", "whittman", "see", "leave", "children", "bleak", "future"]] | [["NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "VBP", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"]] | fact newspaper record host debate proposed expansion shore drilling know climate change history bp disaster proof anyone needs sick greed driven group people making reporting energy economic policies. unless people rise challenge insanity people like rob whittman see leave children bleak future | ["bp", "disaster"] | bp disaster | 1 | 1 |
Urizen | The fact that the newspaper of record can host a debate on the proposed expansion of off-shore drilling, with all we know about climate change, with the history of the BP disaster, should be all the proof anyone needs that we have a sick, greed-driven group of people making and reporting on our energy and economic policies. Unless the people rise up and challenge this insanity, people like Rob Whittman will see to it that we leave our children with a very bleak future. | the atlantic coast | A1371-P | economy | 2 | 3 | 16,853 | 14,166,329 | [["fact", "newspaper", "record", "host", "debate", "proposed", "expansion", "shore", "drilling", "know", "climate", "change", "history", "bp", "disaster", "proof", "anyone", "needs", "sick", "greed", "driven", "group", "people", "making", "reporting", "energy", "economic", "policies"], ["unless", "people", "rise", "challenge", "insanity", "people", "like", "rob", "whittman", "see", "leave", "children", "bleak", "future"]] | [["NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "VBP", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"]] | fact newspaper record host debate proposed expansion shore drilling know climate change history bp disaster proof anyone needs sick greed driven group people making reporting energy economic policies. unless people rise challenge insanity people like rob whittman see leave children bleak future | ["economy"] | economy | 1 | 0 |
Urizen | The fact that the newspaper of record can host a debate on the proposed expansion of off-shore drilling, with all we know about climate change, with the history of the BP disaster, should be all the proof anyone needs that we have a sick, greed-driven group of people making and reporting on our energy and economic policies. Unless the people rise up and challenge this insanity, people like Rob Whittman will see to it that we leave our children with a very bleak future. | the atlantic coast | A1371-P | climate change | 0 | 3 | 16,854 | 14,166,329 | [["fact", "newspaper", "record", "host", "debate", "proposed", "expansion", "shore", "drilling", "know", "climate", "change", "history", "bp", "disaster", "proof", "anyone", "needs", "sick", "greed", "driven", "group", "people", "making", "reporting", "energy", "economic", "policies"], ["unless", "people", "rise", "challenge", "insanity", "people", "like", "rob", "whittman", "see", "leave", "children", "bleak", "future"]] | [["NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NNS", "VBG", "VBG", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["IN", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "NNP", "VB", "VBP", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"]] | fact newspaper record host debate proposed expansion shore drilling know climate change history bp disaster proof anyone needs sick greed driven group people making reporting energy economic policies. unless people rise challenge insanity people like rob whittman see leave children bleak future | ["climate", "change"] | climate change | 1 | 1 |
R. Adelman | Amen. It almost seems like the menu is part of a bait and switch operation. That $32 osso bucco is not $32 as printed on the menu, it's $38. Dessert is not $8, it's $9.60. You can do the arithmetic on a bottle of wine. Your $120 check actually runs you $144. God forbid you take the whole family out. | workplace | A3318-P | high meal prices | 0 | 2 | 7,330 | 9,308,480 | [["amen"], ["almost", "seems", "like", "menu", "part", "bait", "switch", "operation"], ["32", "osso", "bucco", "32", "printed", "menu", "'s", "38"], ["dessert", "8", "'s", "9.60"], ["arithmetic", "bottle", "wine"], ["120", "check", "actually", "runs", "144"], ["god", "forbid", "take", "whole", "family"]] | [["UH"], ["RB", "VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "CD", "VBN", "NN", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "CD", "VBZ", "CD"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "RB", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | amen. almost seems like menu part bait switch operation. 32 osso bucco 32 printed menu 's 38. dessert 8 's 9.60. arithmetic bottle wine. 120 check actually runs 144. god forbid take whole family | ["high", "meal", "price"] | high meal price | 1 | 0 |
R. Adelman | Amen. It almost seems like the menu is part of a bait and switch operation. That $32 osso bucco is not $32 as printed on the menu, it's $38. Dessert is not $8, it's $9.60. You can do the arithmetic on a bottle of wine. Your $120 check actually runs you $144. God forbid you take the whole family out. | workplace | A3318-P | restaurant pricing | 0 | 2 | 7,331 | 9,308,480 | [["amen"], ["almost", "seems", "like", "menu", "part", "bait", "switch", "operation"], ["32", "osso", "bucco", "32", "printed", "menu", "'s", "38"], ["dessert", "8", "'s", "9.60"], ["arithmetic", "bottle", "wine"], ["120", "check", "actually", "runs", "144"], ["god", "forbid", "take", "whole", "family"]] | [["UH"], ["RB", "VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "CD", "VBN", "NN", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "CD", "VBZ", "CD"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "RB", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | amen. almost seems like menu part bait switch operation. 32 osso bucco 32 printed menu 's 38. dessert 8 's 9.60. arithmetic bottle wine. 120 check actually runs 144. god forbid take whole family | ["restaurant", "pricing"] | restaurant pricing | 1 | 0 |
R. Adelman | Amen. It almost seems like the menu is part of a bait and switch operation. That $32 osso bucco is not $32 as printed on the menu, it's $38. Dessert is not $8, it's $9.60. You can do the arithmetic on a bottle of wine. Your $120 check actually runs you $144. God forbid you take the whole family out. | workplace | A3318-P | unfair restaurant prices | 0 | 2 | 7,332 | 9,308,480 | [["amen"], ["almost", "seems", "like", "menu", "part", "bait", "switch", "operation"], ["32", "osso", "bucco", "32", "printed", "menu", "'s", "38"], ["dessert", "8", "'s", "9.60"], ["arithmetic", "bottle", "wine"], ["120", "check", "actually", "runs", "144"], ["god", "forbid", "take", "whole", "family"]] | [["UH"], ["RB", "VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "CD", "VBN", "NN", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "CD", "VBZ", "CD"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "RB", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | amen. almost seems like menu part bait switch operation. 32 osso bucco 32 printed menu 's 38. dessert 8 's 9.60. arithmetic bottle wine. 120 check actually runs 144. god forbid take whole family | ["unfair", "restaurant", "price"] | unfair restaurant price | 1 | 0 |
R. Adelman | Amen. It almost seems like the menu is part of a bait and switch operation. That $32 osso bucco is not $32 as printed on the menu, it's $38. Dessert is not $8, it's $9.60. You can do the arithmetic on a bottle of wine. Your $120 check actually runs you $144. God forbid you take the whole family out. | workplace | A3318-P | menu | 0 | 3 | 7,333 | 9,308,480 | [["amen"], ["almost", "seems", "like", "menu", "part", "bait", "switch", "operation"], ["32", "osso", "bucco", "32", "printed", "menu", "'s", "38"], ["dessert", "8", "'s", "9.60"], ["arithmetic", "bottle", "wine"], ["120", "check", "actually", "runs", "144"], ["god", "forbid", "take", "whole", "family"]] | [["UH"], ["RB", "VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "CD", "VBN", "NN", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "CD", "VBZ", "CD"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "RB", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | amen. almost seems like menu part bait switch operation. 32 osso bucco 32 printed menu 's 38. dessert 8 's 9.60. arithmetic bottle wine. 120 check actually runs 144. god forbid take whole family | ["menu"] | menu | 1 | 1 |
R. Adelman | Amen. It almost seems like the menu is part of a bait and switch operation. That $32 osso bucco is not $32 as printed on the menu, it's $38. Dessert is not $8, it's $9.60. You can do the arithmetic on a bottle of wine. Your $120 check actually runs you $144. God forbid you take the whole family out. | workplace | A3318-P | going out | 0 | 3 | 7,334 | 9,308,480 | [["amen"], ["almost", "seems", "like", "menu", "part", "bait", "switch", "operation"], ["32", "osso", "bucco", "32", "printed", "menu", "'s", "38"], ["dessert", "8", "'s", "9.60"], ["arithmetic", "bottle", "wine"], ["120", "check", "actually", "runs", "144"], ["god", "forbid", "take", "whole", "family"]] | [["UH"], ["RB", "VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "CD", "VBN", "NN", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "CD", "VBZ", "CD"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "RB", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | amen. almost seems like menu part bait switch operation. 32 osso bucco 32 printed menu 's 38. dessert 8 's 9.60. arithmetic bottle wine. 120 check actually runs 144. god forbid take whole family | ["going"] | going | 1 | 0 |
R. Adelman | Amen. It almost seems like the menu is part of a bait and switch operation. That $32 osso bucco is not $32 as printed on the menu, it's $38. Dessert is not $8, it's $9.60. You can do the arithmetic on a bottle of wine. Your $120 check actually runs you $144. God forbid you take the whole family out. | workplace | A3318-P | prices at restaurants | 0 | 3 | 7,335 | 9,308,480 | [["amen"], ["almost", "seems", "like", "menu", "part", "bait", "switch", "operation"], ["32", "osso", "bucco", "32", "printed", "menu", "'s", "38"], ["dessert", "8", "'s", "9.60"], ["arithmetic", "bottle", "wine"], ["120", "check", "actually", "runs", "144"], ["god", "forbid", "take", "whole", "family"]] | [["UH"], ["RB", "VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "CD", "VBN", "NN", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "CD", "VBZ", "CD"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "RB", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | amen. almost seems like menu part bait switch operation. 32 osso bucco 32 printed menu 's 38. dessert 8 's 9.60. arithmetic bottle wine. 120 check actually runs 144. god forbid take whole family | ["price", "restaurant"] | price restaurant | 1 | 0 |
R. Adelman | Amen. It almost seems like the menu is part of a bait and switch operation. That $32 osso bucco is not $32 as printed on the menu, it's $38. Dessert is not $8, it's $9.60. You can do the arithmetic on a bottle of wine. Your $120 check actually runs you $144. God forbid you take the whole family out. | restaurants | A3317-P | sales tax | 0 | 2 | 10,656 | 9,308,480 | [["amen"], ["almost", "seems", "like", "menu", "part", "bait", "switch", "operation"], ["32", "osso", "bucco", "32", "printed", "menu", "'s", "38"], ["dessert", "8", "'s", "9.60"], ["arithmetic", "bottle", "wine"], ["120", "check", "actually", "runs", "144"], ["god", "forbid", "take", "whole", "family"]] | [["UH"], ["RB", "VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "CD", "VBN", "NN", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "CD", "VBZ", "CD"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "RB", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | amen. almost seems like menu part bait switch operation. 32 osso bucco 32 printed menu 's 38. dessert 8 's 9.60. arithmetic bottle wine. 120 check actually runs 144. god forbid take whole family | ["sale", "tax"] | sale tax | 1 | 0 |
R. Adelman | Amen. It almost seems like the menu is part of a bait and switch operation. That $32 osso bucco is not $32 as printed on the menu, it's $38. Dessert is not $8, it's $9.60. You can do the arithmetic on a bottle of wine. Your $120 check actually runs you $144. God forbid you take the whole family out. | restaurants | A3317-P | sales taxes | 0 | 3 | 10,657 | 9,308,480 | [["amen"], ["almost", "seems", "like", "menu", "part", "bait", "switch", "operation"], ["32", "osso", "bucco", "32", "printed", "menu", "'s", "38"], ["dessert", "8", "'s", "9.60"], ["arithmetic", "bottle", "wine"], ["120", "check", "actually", "runs", "144"], ["god", "forbid", "take", "whole", "family"]] | [["UH"], ["RB", "VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "NN", "CD", "VBN", "NN", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "CD", "VBZ", "CD"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["CD", "NN", "RB", "VBZ", "CD"], ["NNP", "VB", "VB", "JJ", "NN"]] | amen. almost seems like menu part bait switch operation. 32 osso bucco 32 printed menu 's 38. dessert 8 's 9.60. arithmetic bottle wine. 120 check actually runs 144. god forbid take whole family | ["sale", "tax"] | sale tax | 1 | 0 |
ghulse | I heard a panel discussion on NPR about the latest Facebook flap and not one of the contributers mentioned the consumers' responsibility to seek the most balanced and credible sites for getting their news. Everyone is being spoon fed information and they blame Facebook for not getting the balance right? Thank you, Mrs. Squires for making the most salient point. What would Emerson and Thoreau and Whitman, all champions of individualism, say about the TV/internet age? | news | A1745-P | news | 1 | 1 | 4,964 | 18,557,257 | [["heard", "panel", "discussion", "npr", "latest", "facebook", "flap", "one", "contributers", "mentioned", "consumers", "responsibility", "seek", "balanced", "credible", "sites", "getting", "news"], ["everyone", "spoon", "fed", "information", "blame", "facebook", "getting", "balance", "right"], ["thank", "mrs.", "squires", "making", "salient", "point"], ["would", "emerson", "thoreau", "whitman", "champions", "individualism", "say", "tv", "internet", "age"]] | [["VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJS", "NNP", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VBP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | heard panel discussion npr latest facebook flap one contributers mentioned consumers responsibility seek balanced credible sites getting news. everyone spoon fed information blame facebook getting balance right. thank mrs. squires making salient point. would emerson thoreau whitman champions individualism say tv internet age | ["news"] | news | 1 | 1 |
ghulse | I heard a panel discussion on NPR about the latest Facebook flap and not one of the contributers mentioned the consumers' responsibility to seek the most balanced and credible sites for getting their news. Everyone is being spoon fed information and they blame Facebook for not getting the balance right? Thank you, Mrs. Squires for making the most salient point. What would Emerson and Thoreau and Whitman, all champions of individualism, say about the TV/internet age? | news | A1745-P | facebook | 1 | 3 | 4,965 | 18,557,257 | [["heard", "panel", "discussion", "npr", "latest", "facebook", "flap", "one", "contributers", "mentioned", "consumers", "responsibility", "seek", "balanced", "credible", "sites", "getting", "news"], ["everyone", "spoon", "fed", "information", "blame", "facebook", "getting", "balance", "right"], ["thank", "mrs.", "squires", "making", "salient", "point"], ["would", "emerson", "thoreau", "whitman", "champions", "individualism", "say", "tv", "internet", "age"]] | [["VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJS", "NNP", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VBP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | heard panel discussion npr latest facebook flap one contributers mentioned consumers responsibility seek balanced credible sites getting news. everyone spoon fed information blame facebook getting balance right. thank mrs. squires making salient point. would emerson thoreau whitman champions individualism say tv internet age | ["facebook"] | facebook | 1 | 1 |
ghulse | I heard a panel discussion on NPR about the latest Facebook flap and not one of the contributers mentioned the consumers' responsibility to seek the most balanced and credible sites for getting their news. Everyone is being spoon fed information and they blame Facebook for not getting the balance right? Thank you, Mrs. Squires for making the most salient point. What would Emerson and Thoreau and Whitman, all champions of individualism, say about the TV/internet age? | news | A1745-P | facebook news | 1 | 2 | 4,966 | 18,557,257 | [["heard", "panel", "discussion", "npr", "latest", "facebook", "flap", "one", "contributers", "mentioned", "consumers", "responsibility", "seek", "balanced", "credible", "sites", "getting", "news"], ["everyone", "spoon", "fed", "information", "blame", "facebook", "getting", "balance", "right"], ["thank", "mrs.", "squires", "making", "salient", "point"], ["would", "emerson", "thoreau", "whitman", "champions", "individualism", "say", "tv", "internet", "age"]] | [["VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJS", "NNP", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VBP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | heard panel discussion npr latest facebook flap one contributers mentioned consumers responsibility seek balanced credible sites getting news. everyone spoon fed information blame facebook getting balance right. thank mrs. squires making salient point. would emerson thoreau whitman champions individualism say tv internet age | ["facebook", "news"] | facebook news | 1 | 0 |
ghulse | I heard a panel discussion on NPR about the latest Facebook flap and not one of the contributers mentioned the consumers' responsibility to seek the most balanced and credible sites for getting their news. Everyone is being spoon fed information and they blame Facebook for not getting the balance right? Thank you, Mrs. Squires for making the most salient point. What would Emerson and Thoreau and Whitman, all champions of individualism, say about the TV/internet age? | news | A1745-P | facebook | 1 | 3 | 4,967 | 18,557,257 | [["heard", "panel", "discussion", "npr", "latest", "facebook", "flap", "one", "contributers", "mentioned", "consumers", "responsibility", "seek", "balanced", "credible", "sites", "getting", "news"], ["everyone", "spoon", "fed", "information", "blame", "facebook", "getting", "balance", "right"], ["thank", "mrs.", "squires", "making", "salient", "point"], ["would", "emerson", "thoreau", "whitman", "champions", "individualism", "say", "tv", "internet", "age"]] | [["VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJS", "NNP", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VBP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | heard panel discussion npr latest facebook flap one contributers mentioned consumers responsibility seek balanced credible sites getting news. everyone spoon fed information blame facebook getting balance right. thank mrs. squires making salient point. would emerson thoreau whitman champions individualism say tv internet age | ["facebook"] | facebook | 1 | 1 |
ghulse | I heard a panel discussion on NPR about the latest Facebook flap and not one of the contributers mentioned the consumers' responsibility to seek the most balanced and credible sites for getting their news. Everyone is being spoon fed information and they blame Facebook for not getting the balance right? Thank you, Mrs. Squires for making the most salient point. What would Emerson and Thoreau and Whitman, all champions of individualism, say about the TV/internet age? | newspapers | A1746-P | newspapers | 0 | 1 | 5,169 | 18,557,257 | [["heard", "panel", "discussion", "npr", "latest", "facebook", "flap", "one", "contributers", "mentioned", "consumers", "responsibility", "seek", "balanced", "credible", "sites", "getting", "news"], ["everyone", "spoon", "fed", "information", "blame", "facebook", "getting", "balance", "right"], ["thank", "mrs.", "squires", "making", "salient", "point"], ["would", "emerson", "thoreau", "whitman", "champions", "individualism", "say", "tv", "internet", "age"]] | [["VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJS", "NNP", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VBP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | heard panel discussion npr latest facebook flap one contributers mentioned consumers responsibility seek balanced credible sites getting news. everyone spoon fed information blame facebook getting balance right. thank mrs. squires making salient point. would emerson thoreau whitman champions individualism say tv internet age | ["newspaper"] | newspaper | 1 | 0 |
ghulse | I heard a panel discussion on NPR about the latest Facebook flap and not one of the contributers mentioned the consumers' responsibility to seek the most balanced and credible sites for getting their news. Everyone is being spoon fed information and they blame Facebook for not getting the balance right? Thank you, Mrs. Squires for making the most salient point. What would Emerson and Thoreau and Whitman, all champions of individualism, say about the TV/internet age? | newspapers | A1746-P | social media | 0 | 3 | 5,170 | 18,557,257 | [["heard", "panel", "discussion", "npr", "latest", "facebook", "flap", "one", "contributers", "mentioned", "consumers", "responsibility", "seek", "balanced", "credible", "sites", "getting", "news"], ["everyone", "spoon", "fed", "information", "blame", "facebook", "getting", "balance", "right"], ["thank", "mrs.", "squires", "making", "salient", "point"], ["would", "emerson", "thoreau", "whitman", "champions", "individualism", "say", "tv", "internet", "age"]] | [["VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJS", "NNP", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VBP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | heard panel discussion npr latest facebook flap one contributers mentioned consumers responsibility seek balanced credible sites getting news. everyone spoon fed information blame facebook getting balance right. thank mrs. squires making salient point. would emerson thoreau whitman champions individualism say tv internet age | ["social", "medium"] | social medium | 1 | 0 |
ghulse | I heard a panel discussion on NPR about the latest Facebook flap and not one of the contributers mentioned the consumers' responsibility to seek the most balanced and credible sites for getting their news. Everyone is being spoon fed information and they blame Facebook for not getting the balance right? Thank you, Mrs. Squires for making the most salient point. What would Emerson and Thoreau and Whitman, all champions of individualism, say about the TV/internet age? | newspapers | A1746-P | facebook | 1 | 3 | 5,171 | 18,557,257 | [["heard", "panel", "discussion", "npr", "latest", "facebook", "flap", "one", "contributers", "mentioned", "consumers", "responsibility", "seek", "balanced", "credible", "sites", "getting", "news"], ["everyone", "spoon", "fed", "information", "blame", "facebook", "getting", "balance", "right"], ["thank", "mrs.", "squires", "making", "salient", "point"], ["would", "emerson", "thoreau", "whitman", "champions", "individualism", "say", "tv", "internet", "age"]] | [["VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJS", "NNP", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VBP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | heard panel discussion npr latest facebook flap one contributers mentioned consumers responsibility seek balanced credible sites getting news. everyone spoon fed information blame facebook getting balance right. thank mrs. squires making salient point. would emerson thoreau whitman champions individualism say tv internet age | ["facebook"] | facebook | 1 | 1 |
ghulse | I heard a panel discussion on NPR about the latest Facebook flap and not one of the contributers mentioned the consumers' responsibility to seek the most balanced and credible sites for getting their news. Everyone is being spoon fed information and they blame Facebook for not getting the balance right? Thank you, Mrs. Squires for making the most salient point. What would Emerson and Thoreau and Whitman, all champions of individualism, say about the TV/internet age? | newspapers | A1746-P | consumer's responsiblity | 1 | 2 | 5,172 | 18,557,257 | [["heard", "panel", "discussion", "npr", "latest", "facebook", "flap", "one", "contributers", "mentioned", "consumers", "responsibility", "seek", "balanced", "credible", "sites", "getting", "news"], ["everyone", "spoon", "fed", "information", "blame", "facebook", "getting", "balance", "right"], ["thank", "mrs.", "squires", "making", "salient", "point"], ["would", "emerson", "thoreau", "whitman", "champions", "individualism", "say", "tv", "internet", "age"]] | [["VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJS", "NNP", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VBP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | heard panel discussion npr latest facebook flap one contributers mentioned consumers responsibility seek balanced credible sites getting news. everyone spoon fed information blame facebook getting balance right. thank mrs. squires making salient point. would emerson thoreau whitman champions individualism say tv internet age | ["consumer", "'s", "responsiblity"] | consumer 's responsiblity | 1 | 0 |
ghulse | I heard a panel discussion on NPR about the latest Facebook flap and not one of the contributers mentioned the consumers' responsibility to seek the most balanced and credible sites for getting their news. Everyone is being spoon fed information and they blame Facebook for not getting the balance right? Thank you, Mrs. Squires for making the most salient point. What would Emerson and Thoreau and Whitman, all champions of individualism, say about the TV/internet age? | newspapers | A1746-P | internet news | 1 | 3 | 5,173 | 18,557,257 | [["heard", "panel", "discussion", "npr", "latest", "facebook", "flap", "one", "contributers", "mentioned", "consumers", "responsibility", "seek", "balanced", "credible", "sites", "getting", "news"], ["everyone", "spoon", "fed", "information", "blame", "facebook", "getting", "balance", "right"], ["thank", "mrs.", "squires", "making", "salient", "point"], ["would", "emerson", "thoreau", "whitman", "champions", "individualism", "say", "tv", "internet", "age"]] | [["VBD", "NN", "NN", "NNP", "JJS", "NNP", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "VBD", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VBG", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "VBP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "JJ"], ["VBP", "NNP", "NNP", "VBG", "NN", "NN"], ["MD", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "NN"]] | heard panel discussion npr latest facebook flap one contributers mentioned consumers responsibility seek balanced credible sites getting news. everyone spoon fed information blame facebook getting balance right. thank mrs. squires making salient point. would emerson thoreau whitman champions individualism say tv internet age | ["internet", "news"] | internet news | 1 | 0 |
CL | It does not matter that parents who home school may pay just as much into the school system as other families. People without children pay as well and don't think this authorizes them to use the library or recreational facilities. In addition, supporting a school is not just about paying taxes. Parents who home school because they don't think public schools are good enough for their offspring weaken the very fabric of the public school system and should not seek to benefit from it. If it's not good enough for English and Math, it's not good enough for sports. (Of course, this should not apply to children who are home schooled because of special needs.) | high school teams | A1026-P | high school teams | 1 | 1 | 8,099 | 5,474,645 | [["matter", "parents", "home", "school", "may", "pay", "much", "school", "system", "families"], ["people", "without", "children", "pay", "well", "n't", "think", "authorizes", "use", "library", "recreational", "facilities"], ["addition", "supporting", "school", "paying", "taxes"], ["parents", "home", "school", "n't", "think", "public", "schools", "good", "enough", "offspring", "weaken", "fabric", "public", "school", "system", "seek", "benefit"], ["'s", "good", "enough", "english", "math", "'s", "good", "enough", "sports"], ["course", "apply", "children", "home", "schooled", "special", "needs"]] | [["VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "IN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBZ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VB"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS"]] | matter parents home school may pay much school system families. people without children pay well n't think authorizes use library recreational facilities. addition supporting school paying taxes. parents home school n't think public schools good enough offspring weaken fabric public school system seek benefit. 's good enough english math 's good enough sports. course apply children home schooled special needs | ["high", "school", "team"] | high school team | 1 | 0 |
CL | It does not matter that parents who home school may pay just as much into the school system as other families. People without children pay as well and don't think this authorizes them to use the library or recreational facilities. In addition, supporting a school is not just about paying taxes. Parents who home school because they don't think public schools are good enough for their offspring weaken the very fabric of the public school system and should not seek to benefit from it. If it's not good enough for English and Math, it's not good enough for sports. (Of course, this should not apply to children who are home schooled because of special needs.) | high school teams | A1026-P | public schools | 1 | 3 | 8,100 | 5,474,645 | [["matter", "parents", "home", "school", "may", "pay", "much", "school", "system", "families"], ["people", "without", "children", "pay", "well", "n't", "think", "authorizes", "use", "library", "recreational", "facilities"], ["addition", "supporting", "school", "paying", "taxes"], ["parents", "home", "school", "n't", "think", "public", "schools", "good", "enough", "offspring", "weaken", "fabric", "public", "school", "system", "seek", "benefit"], ["'s", "good", "enough", "english", "math", "'s", "good", "enough", "sports"], ["course", "apply", "children", "home", "schooled", "special", "needs"]] | [["VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "IN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBZ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VB"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS"]] | matter parents home school may pay much school system families. people without children pay well n't think authorizes use library recreational facilities. addition supporting school paying taxes. parents home school n't think public schools good enough offspring weaken fabric public school system seek benefit. 's good enough english math 's good enough sports. course apply children home schooled special needs | ["public", "school"] | public school | 1 | 1 |
CL | It does not matter that parents who home school may pay just as much into the school system as other families. People without children pay as well and don't think this authorizes them to use the library or recreational facilities. In addition, supporting a school is not just about paying taxes. Parents who home school because they don't think public schools are good enough for their offspring weaken the very fabric of the public school system and should not seek to benefit from it. If it's not good enough for English and Math, it's not good enough for sports. (Of course, this should not apply to children who are home schooled because of special needs.) | high school teams | A1026-P | public education | 1 | 2 | 8,101 | 5,474,645 | [["matter", "parents", "home", "school", "may", "pay", "much", "school", "system", "families"], ["people", "without", "children", "pay", "well", "n't", "think", "authorizes", "use", "library", "recreational", "facilities"], ["addition", "supporting", "school", "paying", "taxes"], ["parents", "home", "school", "n't", "think", "public", "schools", "good", "enough", "offspring", "weaken", "fabric", "public", "school", "system", "seek", "benefit"], ["'s", "good", "enough", "english", "math", "'s", "good", "enough", "sports"], ["course", "apply", "children", "home", "schooled", "special", "needs"]] | [["VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "IN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBZ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VB"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS"]] | matter parents home school may pay much school system families. people without children pay well n't think authorizes use library recreational facilities. addition supporting school paying taxes. parents home school n't think public schools good enough offspring weaken fabric public school system seek benefit. 's good enough english math 's good enough sports. course apply children home schooled special needs | ["public", "education"] | public education | 1 | 0 |
CL | It does not matter that parents who home school may pay just as much into the school system as other families. People without children pay as well and don't think this authorizes them to use the library or recreational facilities. In addition, supporting a school is not just about paying taxes. Parents who home school because they don't think public schools are good enough for their offspring weaken the very fabric of the public school system and should not seek to benefit from it. If it's not good enough for English and Math, it's not good enough for sports. (Of course, this should not apply to children who are home schooled because of special needs.) | high school teams | A1026-P | use of public school facilities | 1 | 3 | 8,102 | 5,474,645 | [["matter", "parents", "home", "school", "may", "pay", "much", "school", "system", "families"], ["people", "without", "children", "pay", "well", "n't", "think", "authorizes", "use", "library", "recreational", "facilities"], ["addition", "supporting", "school", "paying", "taxes"], ["parents", "home", "school", "n't", "think", "public", "schools", "good", "enough", "offspring", "weaken", "fabric", "public", "school", "system", "seek", "benefit"], ["'s", "good", "enough", "english", "math", "'s", "good", "enough", "sports"], ["course", "apply", "children", "home", "schooled", "special", "needs"]] | [["VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "IN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBZ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VB"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS"]] | matter parents home school may pay much school system families. people without children pay well n't think authorizes use library recreational facilities. addition supporting school paying taxes. parents home school n't think public schools good enough offspring weaken fabric public school system seek benefit. 's good enough english math 's good enough sports. course apply children home schooled special needs | ["use", "public", "school", "facility"] | use public school facility | 1 | 0 |
CL | It does not matter that parents who home school may pay just as much into the school system as other families. People without children pay as well and don't think this authorizes them to use the library or recreational facilities. In addition, supporting a school is not just about paying taxes. Parents who home school because they don't think public schools are good enough for their offspring weaken the very fabric of the public school system and should not seek to benefit from it. If it's not good enough for English and Math, it's not good enough for sports. (Of course, this should not apply to children who are home schooled because of special needs.) | home-schoolers | A1025-P | home-schoolers | 0 | 1 | 8,876 | 5,474,645 | [["matter", "parents", "home", "school", "may", "pay", "much", "school", "system", "families"], ["people", "without", "children", "pay", "well", "n't", "think", "authorizes", "use", "library", "recreational", "facilities"], ["addition", "supporting", "school", "paying", "taxes"], ["parents", "home", "school", "n't", "think", "public", "schools", "good", "enough", "offspring", "weaken", "fabric", "public", "school", "system", "seek", "benefit"], ["'s", "good", "enough", "english", "math", "'s", "good", "enough", "sports"], ["course", "apply", "children", "home", "schooled", "special", "needs"]] | [["VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "IN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBZ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VB"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS"]] | matter parents home school may pay much school system families. people without children pay well n't think authorizes use library recreational facilities. addition supporting school paying taxes. parents home school n't think public schools good enough offspring weaken fabric public school system seek benefit. 's good enough english math 's good enough sports. course apply children home schooled special needs | ["home", "schoolers"] | home schoolers | 1 | 0 |
CL | It does not matter that parents who home school may pay just as much into the school system as other families. People without children pay as well and don't think this authorizes them to use the library or recreational facilities. In addition, supporting a school is not just about paying taxes. Parents who home school because they don't think public schools are good enough for their offspring weaken the very fabric of the public school system and should not seek to benefit from it. If it's not good enough for English and Math, it's not good enough for sports. (Of course, this should not apply to children who are home schooled because of special needs.) | home-schoolers | A1025-P | public education | 0 | 3 | 8,877 | 5,474,645 | [["matter", "parents", "home", "school", "may", "pay", "much", "school", "system", "families"], ["people", "without", "children", "pay", "well", "n't", "think", "authorizes", "use", "library", "recreational", "facilities"], ["addition", "supporting", "school", "paying", "taxes"], ["parents", "home", "school", "n't", "think", "public", "schools", "good", "enough", "offspring", "weaken", "fabric", "public", "school", "system", "seek", "benefit"], ["'s", "good", "enough", "english", "math", "'s", "good", "enough", "sports"], ["course", "apply", "children", "home", "schooled", "special", "needs"]] | [["VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "IN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBZ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VB"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS"]] | matter parents home school may pay much school system families. people without children pay well n't think authorizes use library recreational facilities. addition supporting school paying taxes. parents home school n't think public schools good enough offspring weaken fabric public school system seek benefit. 's good enough english math 's good enough sports. course apply children home schooled special needs | ["public", "education"] | public education | 1 | 0 |
CL | It does not matter that parents who home school may pay just as much into the school system as other families. People without children pay as well and don't think this authorizes them to use the library or recreational facilities. In addition, supporting a school is not just about paying taxes. Parents who home school because they don't think public schools are good enough for their offspring weaken the very fabric of the public school system and should not seek to benefit from it. If it's not good enough for English and Math, it's not good enough for sports. (Of course, this should not apply to children who are home schooled because of special needs.) | home-schoolers | A1025-P | home schooling | 1 | 3 | 8,878 | 5,474,645 | [["matter", "parents", "home", "school", "may", "pay", "much", "school", "system", "families"], ["people", "without", "children", "pay", "well", "n't", "think", "authorizes", "use", "library", "recreational", "facilities"], ["addition", "supporting", "school", "paying", "taxes"], ["parents", "home", "school", "n't", "think", "public", "schools", "good", "enough", "offspring", "weaken", "fabric", "public", "school", "system", "seek", "benefit"], ["'s", "good", "enough", "english", "math", "'s", "good", "enough", "sports"], ["course", "apply", "children", "home", "schooled", "special", "needs"]] | [["VB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "MD", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "IN", "NNS", "VBP", "RB", "RB", "VB", "VBZ", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "NN", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "VB"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNP", "NNP", "VBZ", "JJ", "RB", "NNS"], ["RB", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VBN", "JJ", "NNS"]] | matter parents home school may pay much school system families. people without children pay well n't think authorizes use library recreational facilities. addition supporting school paying taxes. parents home school n't think public schools good enough offspring weaken fabric public school system seek benefit. 's good enough english math 's good enough sports. course apply children home schooled special needs | ["home", "schooling"] | home schooling | 1 | 0 |
landless | The problem is the cost of non-vaccination is not borne by the dissenting parents, but by the sickened and possibly dead injured by the loss of herd immunity. If someone does not want their children to be vaccinated, that person should be required to post a bond to cover the potential damages. A bond should also be required by individuals claiming religious exemptions. | vaccination | A1537-P | vaccination | 1 | 1 | 7,011 | 11,405,667 | [["problem", "cost", "non", "vaccination", "borne", "dissenting", "parents", "sickened", "possibly", "dead", "injured", "loss", "herd", "immunity"], ["someone", "want", "children", "vaccinated", "person", "required", "post", "bond", "cover", "potential", "damages"], ["bond", "also", "required", "individuals", "claiming", "religious", "exemptions"]] | [["NN", "NN", "AFX", "NN", "VBN", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS"]] | problem cost non vaccination borne dissenting parents sickened possibly dead injured loss herd immunity. someone want children vaccinated person required post bond cover potential damages. bond also required individuals claiming religious exemptions | ["vaccination"] | vaccination | 1 | 1 |
landless | The problem is the cost of non-vaccination is not borne by the dissenting parents, but by the sickened and possibly dead injured by the loss of herd immunity. If someone does not want their children to be vaccinated, that person should be required to post a bond to cover the potential damages. A bond should also be required by individuals claiming religious exemptions. | vaccination | A1537-P | vaccination | 1 | 3 | 7,012 | 11,405,667 | [["problem", "cost", "non", "vaccination", "borne", "dissenting", "parents", "sickened", "possibly", "dead", "injured", "loss", "herd", "immunity"], ["someone", "want", "children", "vaccinated", "person", "required", "post", "bond", "cover", "potential", "damages"], ["bond", "also", "required", "individuals", "claiming", "religious", "exemptions"]] | [["NN", "NN", "AFX", "NN", "VBN", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS"]] | problem cost non vaccination borne dissenting parents sickened possibly dead injured loss herd immunity. someone want children vaccinated person required post bond cover potential damages. bond also required individuals claiming religious exemptions | ["vaccination"] | vaccination | 1 | 1 |
landless | The problem is the cost of non-vaccination is not borne by the dissenting parents, but by the sickened and possibly dead injured by the loss of herd immunity. If someone does not want their children to be vaccinated, that person should be required to post a bond to cover the potential damages. A bond should also be required by individuals claiming religious exemptions. | vaccination | A1537-P | non vaccination | 1 | 3 | 7,013 | 11,405,667 | [["problem", "cost", "non", "vaccination", "borne", "dissenting", "parents", "sickened", "possibly", "dead", "injured", "loss", "herd", "immunity"], ["someone", "want", "children", "vaccinated", "person", "required", "post", "bond", "cover", "potential", "damages"], ["bond", "also", "required", "individuals", "claiming", "religious", "exemptions"]] | [["NN", "NN", "AFX", "NN", "VBN", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS"]] | problem cost non vaccination borne dissenting parents sickened possibly dead injured loss herd immunity. someone want children vaccinated person required post bond cover potential damages. bond also required individuals claiming religious exemptions | ["non", "vaccination"] | non vaccination | 1 | 1 |
landless | The problem is the cost of non-vaccination is not borne by the dissenting parents, but by the sickened and possibly dead injured by the loss of herd immunity. If someone does not want their children to be vaccinated, that person should be required to post a bond to cover the potential damages. A bond should also be required by individuals claiming religious exemptions. | vaccination | A1537-P | vaccine | 1 | 3 | 7,014 | 11,405,667 | [["problem", "cost", "non", "vaccination", "borne", "dissenting", "parents", "sickened", "possibly", "dead", "injured", "loss", "herd", "immunity"], ["someone", "want", "children", "vaccinated", "person", "required", "post", "bond", "cover", "potential", "damages"], ["bond", "also", "required", "individuals", "claiming", "religious", "exemptions"]] | [["NN", "NN", "AFX", "NN", "VBN", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS"]] | problem cost non vaccination borne dissenting parents sickened possibly dead injured loss herd immunity. someone want children vaccinated person required post bond cover potential damages. bond also required individuals claiming religious exemptions | ["vaccine"] | vaccine | 1 | 0 |
landless | The problem is the cost of non-vaccination is not borne by the dissenting parents, but by the sickened and possibly dead injured by the loss of herd immunity. If someone does not want their children to be vaccinated, that person should be required to post a bond to cover the potential damages. A bond should also be required by individuals claiming religious exemptions. | mandatory for all children | A1538-P | mandatory for all children | 1 | 1 | 7,377 | 11,405,667 | [["problem", "cost", "non", "vaccination", "borne", "dissenting", "parents", "sickened", "possibly", "dead", "injured", "loss", "herd", "immunity"], ["someone", "want", "children", "vaccinated", "person", "required", "post", "bond", "cover", "potential", "damages"], ["bond", "also", "required", "individuals", "claiming", "religious", "exemptions"]] | [["NN", "NN", "AFX", "NN", "VBN", "VBG", "NNS", "JJ", "RB", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "RB", "VBN", "NNS", "VBG", "JJ", "NNS"]] | problem cost non vaccination borne dissenting parents sickened possibly dead injured loss herd immunity. someone want children vaccinated person required post bond cover potential damages. bond also required individuals claiming religious exemptions | ["mandatory", "child"] | mandatory child | 1 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.