author
string
post
string
ori_topic
string
ori_id
string
new_topic
string
label
int64
type_idx
int64
new_id
int64
arc_id
int64
text
string
pos_text
string
text_s
string
topic
string
topic_str
string
seen?
int64
contains_topic?
int64
Deep Thought
"But let's start with the basics. Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security. The Palestinian Authority does not yet meet any of them." Historians would strongly disagree with you. Around sometime late eighteenth century some thirteen odd British colonies did "declare independence" without any resemblance of "strong central government" with its territory controlled by the British. Today a certain French foreign minister called it a "hyper-power" and not a "failed state". Please check upon a historian or read up your history. Trust me! It is true!!
a palestinian state
A2110-P
a palestinian state
0
1
12,464
13,088,438
[["let", "'s", "start", "basics"], ["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["palestinian", "authority", "yet", "meet"], ["historians", "would", "strongly", "disagree"], ["around", "sometime", "late", "eighteenth", "century", "thirteen", "odd", "british", "colonies", "declare", "independence", "without", "resemblance", "strong", "central", "government", "territory", "controlled", "british"], ["today", "certain", "french", "foreign", "minister", "called", "hyper", "power", "failed", "state"], ["please", "check", "upon", "historian", "read", "history"], ["trust"], ["true"]]
[["VB", "PRP", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VB"], ["NNS", "MD", "RB", "VB"], ["IN", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["UH", "VB", "IN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["VB"], ["JJ"]]
let 's start basics. nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. palestinian authority yet meet. historians would strongly disagree. around sometime late eighteenth century thirteen odd british colonies declare independence without resemblance strong central government territory controlled british. today certain french foreign minister called hyper power failed state. please check upon historian read history. trust. true
["palestinian", "state"]
palestinian state
1
0
Deep Thought
"But let's start with the basics. Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security. The Palestinian Authority does not yet meet any of them." Historians would strongly disagree with you. Around sometime late eighteenth century some thirteen odd British colonies did "declare independence" without any resemblance of "strong central government" with its territory controlled by the British. Today a certain French foreign minister called it a "hyper-power" and not a "failed state". Please check upon a historian or read up your history. Trust me! It is true!!
a palestinian state
A2110-P
nation
0
3
12,465
13,088,438
[["let", "'s", "start", "basics"], ["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["palestinian", "authority", "yet", "meet"], ["historians", "would", "strongly", "disagree"], ["around", "sometime", "late", "eighteenth", "century", "thirteen", "odd", "british", "colonies", "declare", "independence", "without", "resemblance", "strong", "central", "government", "territory", "controlled", "british"], ["today", "certain", "french", "foreign", "minister", "called", "hyper", "power", "failed", "state"], ["please", "check", "upon", "historian", "read", "history"], ["trust"], ["true"]]
[["VB", "PRP", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VB"], ["NNS", "MD", "RB", "VB"], ["IN", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["UH", "VB", "IN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["VB"], ["JJ"]]
let 's start basics. nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. palestinian authority yet meet. historians would strongly disagree. around sometime late eighteenth century thirteen odd british colonies declare independence without resemblance strong central government territory controlled british. today certain french foreign minister called hyper power failed state. please check upon historian read history. trust. true
["nation"]
nation
1
1
Deep Thought
"But let's start with the basics. Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security. The Palestinian Authority does not yet meet any of them." Historians would strongly disagree with you. Around sometime late eighteenth century some thirteen odd British colonies did "declare independence" without any resemblance of "strong central government" with its territory controlled by the British. Today a certain French foreign minister called it a "hyper-power" and not a "failed state". Please check upon a historian or read up your history. Trust me! It is true!!
a palestinian state
A2110-P
palestinian authority
0
3
12,466
13,088,438
[["let", "'s", "start", "basics"], ["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["palestinian", "authority", "yet", "meet"], ["historians", "would", "strongly", "disagree"], ["around", "sometime", "late", "eighteenth", "century", "thirteen", "odd", "british", "colonies", "declare", "independence", "without", "resemblance", "strong", "central", "government", "territory", "controlled", "british"], ["today", "certain", "french", "foreign", "minister", "called", "hyper", "power", "failed", "state"], ["please", "check", "upon", "historian", "read", "history"], ["trust"], ["true"]]
[["VB", "PRP", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VB"], ["NNS", "MD", "RB", "VB"], ["IN", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["UH", "VB", "IN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["VB"], ["JJ"]]
let 's start basics. nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. palestinian authority yet meet. historians would strongly disagree. around sometime late eighteenth century thirteen odd british colonies declare independence without resemblance strong central government territory controlled british. today certain french foreign minister called hyper power failed state. please check upon historian read history. trust. true
["palestinian", "authority"]
palestinian authority
1
1
Deep Thought
"But let's start with the basics. Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security. The Palestinian Authority does not yet meet any of them." Historians would strongly disagree with you. Around sometime late eighteenth century some thirteen odd British colonies did "declare independence" without any resemblance of "strong central government" with its territory controlled by the British. Today a certain French foreign minister called it a "hyper-power" and not a "failed state". Please check upon a historian or read up your history. Trust me! It is true!!
nations
A2109-P
nations
1
1
13,016
13,088,438
[["let", "'s", "start", "basics"], ["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["palestinian", "authority", "yet", "meet"], ["historians", "would", "strongly", "disagree"], ["around", "sometime", "late", "eighteenth", "century", "thirteen", "odd", "british", "colonies", "declare", "independence", "without", "resemblance", "strong", "central", "government", "territory", "controlled", "british"], ["today", "certain", "french", "foreign", "minister", "called", "hyper", "power", "failed", "state"], ["please", "check", "upon", "historian", "read", "history"], ["trust"], ["true"]]
[["VB", "PRP", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VB"], ["NNS", "MD", "RB", "VB"], ["IN", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["UH", "VB", "IN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["VB"], ["JJ"]]
let 's start basics. nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. palestinian authority yet meet. historians would strongly disagree. around sometime late eighteenth century thirteen odd british colonies declare independence without resemblance strong central government territory controlled british. today certain french foreign minister called hyper power failed state. please check upon historian read history. trust. true
["nation"]
nation
1
1
Deep Thought
"But let's start with the basics. Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security. The Palestinian Authority does not yet meet any of them." Historians would strongly disagree with you. Around sometime late eighteenth century some thirteen odd British colonies did "declare independence" without any resemblance of "strong central government" with its territory controlled by the British. Today a certain French foreign minister called it a "hyper-power" and not a "failed state". Please check upon a historian or read up your history. Trust me! It is true!!
nations
A2109-P
palestine
1
3
13,017
13,088,438
[["let", "'s", "start", "basics"], ["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["palestinian", "authority", "yet", "meet"], ["historians", "would", "strongly", "disagree"], ["around", "sometime", "late", "eighteenth", "century", "thirteen", "odd", "british", "colonies", "declare", "independence", "without", "resemblance", "strong", "central", "government", "territory", "controlled", "british"], ["today", "certain", "french", "foreign", "minister", "called", "hyper", "power", "failed", "state"], ["please", "check", "upon", "historian", "read", "history"], ["trust"], ["true"]]
[["VB", "PRP", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VB"], ["NNS", "MD", "RB", "VB"], ["IN", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["UH", "VB", "IN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["VB"], ["JJ"]]
let 's start basics. nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. palestinian authority yet meet. historians would strongly disagree. around sometime late eighteenth century thirteen odd british colonies declare independence without resemblance strong central government territory controlled british. today certain french foreign minister called hyper power failed state. please check upon historian read history. trust. true
["palestine"]
palestine
1
0
Deep Thought
"But let's start with the basics. Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security. The Palestinian Authority does not yet meet any of them." Historians would strongly disagree with you. Around sometime late eighteenth century some thirteen odd British colonies did "declare independence" without any resemblance of "strong central government" with its territory controlled by the British. Today a certain French foreign minister called it a "hyper-power" and not a "failed state". Please check upon a historian or read up your history. Trust me! It is true!!
nations
A2109-P
independence
1
3
13,018
13,088,438
[["let", "'s", "start", "basics"], ["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["palestinian", "authority", "yet", "meet"], ["historians", "would", "strongly", "disagree"], ["around", "sometime", "late", "eighteenth", "century", "thirteen", "odd", "british", "colonies", "declare", "independence", "without", "resemblance", "strong", "central", "government", "territory", "controlled", "british"], ["today", "certain", "french", "foreign", "minister", "called", "hyper", "power", "failed", "state"], ["please", "check", "upon", "historian", "read", "history"], ["trust"], ["true"]]
[["VB", "PRP", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VB"], ["NNS", "MD", "RB", "VB"], ["IN", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["UH", "VB", "IN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["VB"], ["JJ"]]
let 's start basics. nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. palestinian authority yet meet. historians would strongly disagree. around sometime late eighteenth century thirteen odd british colonies declare independence without resemblance strong central government territory controlled british. today certain french foreign minister called hyper power failed state. please check upon historian read history. trust. true
["independence"]
independence
1
1
Deep Thought
"But let's start with the basics. Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security. The Palestinian Authority does not yet meet any of them." Historians would strongly disagree with you. Around sometime late eighteenth century some thirteen odd British colonies did "declare independence" without any resemblance of "strong central government" with its territory controlled by the British. Today a certain French foreign minister called it a "hyper-power" and not a "failed state". Please check upon a historian or read up your history. Trust me! It is true!!
nations
A2109-P
independence
1
2
13,019
13,088,438
[["let", "'s", "start", "basics"], ["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["palestinian", "authority", "yet", "meet"], ["historians", "would", "strongly", "disagree"], ["around", "sometime", "late", "eighteenth", "century", "thirteen", "odd", "british", "colonies", "declare", "independence", "without", "resemblance", "strong", "central", "government", "territory", "controlled", "british"], ["today", "certain", "french", "foreign", "minister", "called", "hyper", "power", "failed", "state"], ["please", "check", "upon", "historian", "read", "history"], ["trust"], ["true"]]
[["VB", "PRP", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VB"], ["NNS", "MD", "RB", "VB"], ["IN", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["UH", "VB", "IN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["VB"], ["JJ"]]
let 's start basics. nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. palestinian authority yet meet. historians would strongly disagree. around sometime late eighteenth century thirteen odd british colonies declare independence without resemblance strong central government territory controlled british. today certain french foreign minister called hyper power failed state. please check upon historian read history. trust. true
["independence"]
independence
1
1
Deep Thought
"But let's start with the basics. Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security. The Palestinian Authority does not yet meet any of them." Historians would strongly disagree with you. Around sometime late eighteenth century some thirteen odd British colonies did "declare independence" without any resemblance of "strong central government" with its territory controlled by the British. Today a certain French foreign minister called it a "hyper-power" and not a "failed state". Please check upon a historian or read up your history. Trust me! It is true!!
nations
A2109-P
history
1
3
13,020
13,088,438
[["let", "'s", "start", "basics"], ["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["palestinian", "authority", "yet", "meet"], ["historians", "would", "strongly", "disagree"], ["around", "sometime", "late", "eighteenth", "century", "thirteen", "odd", "british", "colonies", "declare", "independence", "without", "resemblance", "strong", "central", "government", "territory", "controlled", "british"], ["today", "certain", "french", "foreign", "minister", "called", "hyper", "power", "failed", "state"], ["please", "check", "upon", "historian", "read", "history"], ["trust"], ["true"]]
[["VB", "PRP", "VB", "NNS"], ["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "RB", "VB"], ["NNS", "MD", "RB", "VB"], ["IN", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "CD", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNP"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "NN"], ["UH", "VB", "IN", "NN", "VB", "NN"], ["VB"], ["JJ"]]
let 's start basics. nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. palestinian authority yet meet. historians would strongly disagree. around sometime late eighteenth century thirteen odd british colonies declare independence without resemblance strong central government territory controlled british. today certain french foreign minister called hyper power failed state. please check upon historian read history. trust. true
["history"]
history
1
1
Red Ree
Totally agree on difference between perks and policies. To me policies are super important to both my own morale and my actual productivity. A lot of policies are counter-productive in stupid ways. That makes me miserable because I WANT to be productive and do a good job. Anything that prevents this, especially from my own team, is super frustrating. Such a waste.
workers
A2158-P
workers
1
1
15,932
16,029,367
[["totally", "agree", "difference", "perks", "policies"], ["policies", "super", "important", "morale", "actual", "productivity"], ["lot", "policies", "counter", "productive", "stupid", "ways"], ["makes", "miserable", "want", "productive", "good", "job"], ["anything", "prevents", "especially", "team", "super", "frustrating"], ["waste"]]
[["RB", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"], ["NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "VBP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["NN"]]
totally agree difference perks policies. policies super important morale actual productivity. lot policies counter productive stupid ways. makes miserable want productive good job. anything prevents especially team super frustrating. waste
["worker"]
worker
1
0
Red Ree
Totally agree on difference between perks and policies. To me policies are super important to both my own morale and my actual productivity. A lot of policies are counter-productive in stupid ways. That makes me miserable because I WANT to be productive and do a good job. Anything that prevents this, especially from my own team, is super frustrating. Such a waste.
workers
A2158-P
business policy
1
3
15,933
16,029,367
[["totally", "agree", "difference", "perks", "policies"], ["policies", "super", "important", "morale", "actual", "productivity"], ["lot", "policies", "counter", "productive", "stupid", "ways"], ["makes", "miserable", "want", "productive", "good", "job"], ["anything", "prevents", "especially", "team", "super", "frustrating"], ["waste"]]
[["RB", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"], ["NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "VBP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["NN"]]
totally agree difference perks policies. policies super important morale actual productivity. lot policies counter productive stupid ways. makes miserable want productive good job. anything prevents especially team super frustrating. waste
["business", "policy"]
business policy
1
0
Red Ree
Totally agree on difference between perks and policies. To me policies are super important to both my own morale and my actual productivity. A lot of policies are counter-productive in stupid ways. That makes me miserable because I WANT to be productive and do a good job. Anything that prevents this, especially from my own team, is super frustrating. Such a waste.
workers
A2158-P
company policies that are counter-productive
1
3
15,934
16,029,367
[["totally", "agree", "difference", "perks", "policies"], ["policies", "super", "important", "morale", "actual", "productivity"], ["lot", "policies", "counter", "productive", "stupid", "ways"], ["makes", "miserable", "want", "productive", "good", "job"], ["anything", "prevents", "especially", "team", "super", "frustrating"], ["waste"]]
[["RB", "VBP", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"], ["NNS", "RB", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS"], ["VBZ", "JJ", "VBP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["NN"]]
totally agree difference perks policies. policies super important morale actual productivity. lot policies counter productive stupid ways. makes miserable want productive good job. anything prevents especially team super frustrating. waste
["company", "policy", "counterproductive"]
company policy counterproductive
1
0
Tom
All this hand wringing over the plight of the obese! I think the bottom line is that asking people to take responsibility for their health, in the light of so called "Societal problems/mass obesity" theory is just a joke. If you want action, do something that rewards the behavior you seek to reinforce - lower health care premiums if you drop weight. If I hear another person claim that "this is my natural weight and I'm comfortable with it" I'm going to be sick. Just wait and see if your knees are comfortable toting around an extra 50 pounds over a lifetime...
legislation
A5022-P
obesity
0
2
18,608
4,970,171
[["hand", "wringing", "plight", "obese"], ["think", "bottom", "line", "asking", "people", "take", "responsibility", "health", "light", "called", "societal", "problems", "mass", "obesity", "theory", "joke"], ["want", "action", "something", "rewards", "behavior", "seek", "reinforce", "lower", "health", "care", "premiums", "drop", "weight"], ["hear", "another", "person", "claim", "natural", "weight", "'m", "comfortable", "'m", "going", "sick"], ["wait", "see", "knees", "comfortable", "toting", "around", "extra", "50", "pounds", "lifetime", "..."]]
[["NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBP", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBP", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN"], ["VBP", "DT", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "VBP", "VBG", "JJ"], ["VB", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "VBG", "IN", "JJ", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "."]]
hand wringing plight obese. think bottom line asking people take responsibility health light called societal problems mass obesity theory joke. want action something rewards behavior seek reinforce lower health care premiums drop weight. hear another person claim natural weight 'm comfortable 'm going sick. wait see knees comfortable toting around extra 50 pounds lifetime ...
["obesity"]
obesity
1
1
Tom
All this hand wringing over the plight of the obese! I think the bottom line is that asking people to take responsibility for their health, in the light of so called "Societal problems/mass obesity" theory is just a joke. If you want action, do something that rewards the behavior you seek to reinforce - lower health care premiums if you drop weight. If I hear another person claim that "this is my natural weight and I'm comfortable with it" I'm going to be sick. Just wait and see if your knees are comfortable toting around an extra 50 pounds over a lifetime...
legislation
A5022-P
rewarding healthy behavior
1
2
18,609
4,970,171
[["hand", "wringing", "plight", "obese"], ["think", "bottom", "line", "asking", "people", "take", "responsibility", "health", "light", "called", "societal", "problems", "mass", "obesity", "theory", "joke"], ["want", "action", "something", "rewards", "behavior", "seek", "reinforce", "lower", "health", "care", "premiums", "drop", "weight"], ["hear", "another", "person", "claim", "natural", "weight", "'m", "comfortable", "'m", "going", "sick"], ["wait", "see", "knees", "comfortable", "toting", "around", "extra", "50", "pounds", "lifetime", "..."]]
[["NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBP", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBP", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN"], ["VBP", "DT", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "VBP", "VBG", "JJ"], ["VB", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "VBG", "IN", "JJ", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "."]]
hand wringing plight obese. think bottom line asking people take responsibility health light called societal problems mass obesity theory joke. want action something rewards behavior seek reinforce lower health care premiums drop weight. hear another person claim natural weight 'm comfortable 'm going sick. wait see knees comfortable toting around extra 50 pounds lifetime ...
["rewarding", "healthy", "behavior"]
rewarding healthy behavior
1
0
Tom
All this hand wringing over the plight of the obese! I think the bottom line is that asking people to take responsibility for their health, in the light of so called "Societal problems/mass obesity" theory is just a joke. If you want action, do something that rewards the behavior you seek to reinforce - lower health care premiums if you drop weight. If I hear another person claim that "this is my natural weight and I'm comfortable with it" I'm going to be sick. Just wait and see if your knees are comfortable toting around an extra 50 pounds over a lifetime...
legislation
A5022-P
reward
0
3
18,610
4,970,171
[["hand", "wringing", "plight", "obese"], ["think", "bottom", "line", "asking", "people", "take", "responsibility", "health", "light", "called", "societal", "problems", "mass", "obesity", "theory", "joke"], ["want", "action", "something", "rewards", "behavior", "seek", "reinforce", "lower", "health", "care", "premiums", "drop", "weight"], ["hear", "another", "person", "claim", "natural", "weight", "'m", "comfortable", "'m", "going", "sick"], ["wait", "see", "knees", "comfortable", "toting", "around", "extra", "50", "pounds", "lifetime", "..."]]
[["NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBP", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBP", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN"], ["VBP", "DT", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "VBP", "VBG", "JJ"], ["VB", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "VBG", "IN", "JJ", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "."]]
hand wringing plight obese. think bottom line asking people take responsibility health light called societal problems mass obesity theory joke. want action something rewards behavior seek reinforce lower health care premiums drop weight. hear another person claim natural weight 'm comfortable 'm going sick. wait see knees comfortable toting around extra 50 pounds lifetime ...
["reward"]
reward
1
1
Tom
All this hand wringing over the plight of the obese! I think the bottom line is that asking people to take responsibility for their health, in the light of so called "Societal problems/mass obesity" theory is just a joke. If you want action, do something that rewards the behavior you seek to reinforce - lower health care premiums if you drop weight. If I hear another person claim that "this is my natural weight and I'm comfortable with it" I'm going to be sick. Just wait and see if your knees are comfortable toting around an extra 50 pounds over a lifetime...
legislation
A5022-P
people being obese
1
3
18,611
4,970,171
[["hand", "wringing", "plight", "obese"], ["think", "bottom", "line", "asking", "people", "take", "responsibility", "health", "light", "called", "societal", "problems", "mass", "obesity", "theory", "joke"], ["want", "action", "something", "rewards", "behavior", "seek", "reinforce", "lower", "health", "care", "premiums", "drop", "weight"], ["hear", "another", "person", "claim", "natural", "weight", "'m", "comfortable", "'m", "going", "sick"], ["wait", "see", "knees", "comfortable", "toting", "around", "extra", "50", "pounds", "lifetime", "..."]]
[["NN", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NNP", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBP", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VBP", "VB", "JJR", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VBP", "NN"], ["VBP", "DT", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ", "VBP", "VBG", "JJ"], ["VB", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "VBG", "IN", "JJ", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "."]]
hand wringing plight obese. think bottom line asking people take responsibility health light called societal problems mass obesity theory joke. want action something rewards behavior seek reinforce lower health care premiums drop weight. hear another person claim natural weight 'm comfortable 'm going sick. wait see knees comfortable toting around extra 50 pounds lifetime ...
["people", "obese"]
people obese
1
0
Kathleen
If only the United States would look to this model in Sweden. I have paid so greatly in terms of money for childcare for my three children throughout the years. I estimate it to be greater than $140,000.00, and it was never enough to benefit me when filing tax returns. It was a minimum of $600.00 per month for one child, at 40 hours per week. When I scaled back to 16 hours a week after my third childs birth, my take home pay was one dollar per hour. This was due to the cost of healthcare premiums and childcare cost. The ray of sunshine in this was that the childcare center was onsite in the hospital where I worked, and this allowed me to nurse my son on demand, and return to my desk without disruption.
a smart investment
A404-P
a smart investment
1
1
15,867
8,386,236
[["united", "states", "would", "look", "model", "sweden"], ["paid", "greatly", "terms", "money", "childcare", "three", "children", "throughout", "years"], ["estimate", "greater", "140,000.00", "never", "enough", "benefit", "filing", "tax", "returns"], ["minimum", "600.00", "per", "month", "one", "child", "40", "hours", "per", "week"], ["scaled", "back", "16", "hours", "week", "third", "childs", "birth", "take", "home", "pay", "one", "dollar", "per", "hour"], ["due", "cost", "healthcare", "premiums", "childcare", "cost"], ["ray", "sunshine", "childcare", "center", "onsite", "hospital", "worked", "allowed", "nurse", "son", "demand", "return", "desk", "without", "disruption"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "JJR", "CD", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "IN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NN"], ["VBD", "RB", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "IN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN"]]
united states would look model sweden. paid greatly terms money childcare three children throughout years. estimate greater 140,000.00 never enough benefit filing tax returns. minimum 600.00 per month one child 40 hours per week. scaled back 16 hours week third childs birth take home pay one dollar per hour. due cost healthcare premiums childcare cost. ray sunshine childcare center onsite hospital worked allowed nurse son demand return desk without disruption
["smart", "investment"]
smart investment
1
0
Kathleen
If only the United States would look to this model in Sweden. I have paid so greatly in terms of money for childcare for my three children throughout the years. I estimate it to be greater than $140,000.00, and it was never enough to benefit me when filing tax returns. It was a minimum of $600.00 per month for one child, at 40 hours per week. When I scaled back to 16 hours a week after my third childs birth, my take home pay was one dollar per hour. This was due to the cost of healthcare premiums and childcare cost. The ray of sunshine in this was that the childcare center was onsite in the hospital where I worked, and this allowed me to nurse my son on demand, and return to my desk without disruption.
a smart investment
A404-P
model
1
3
15,868
8,386,236
[["united", "states", "would", "look", "model", "sweden"], ["paid", "greatly", "terms", "money", "childcare", "three", "children", "throughout", "years"], ["estimate", "greater", "140,000.00", "never", "enough", "benefit", "filing", "tax", "returns"], ["minimum", "600.00", "per", "month", "one", "child", "40", "hours", "per", "week"], ["scaled", "back", "16", "hours", "week", "third", "childs", "birth", "take", "home", "pay", "one", "dollar", "per", "hour"], ["due", "cost", "healthcare", "premiums", "childcare", "cost"], ["ray", "sunshine", "childcare", "center", "onsite", "hospital", "worked", "allowed", "nurse", "son", "demand", "return", "desk", "without", "disruption"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "JJR", "CD", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "IN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NN"], ["VBD", "RB", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "IN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN"]]
united states would look model sweden. paid greatly terms money childcare three children throughout years. estimate greater 140,000.00 never enough benefit filing tax returns. minimum 600.00 per month one child 40 hours per week. scaled back 16 hours week third childs birth take home pay one dollar per hour. due cost healthcare premiums childcare cost. ray sunshine childcare center onsite hospital worked allowed nurse son demand return desk without disruption
["model"]
model
1
1
Kathleen
If only the United States would look to this model in Sweden. I have paid so greatly in terms of money for childcare for my three children throughout the years. I estimate it to be greater than $140,000.00, and it was never enough to benefit me when filing tax returns. It was a minimum of $600.00 per month for one child, at 40 hours per week. When I scaled back to 16 hours a week after my third childs birth, my take home pay was one dollar per hour. This was due to the cost of healthcare premiums and childcare cost. The ray of sunshine in this was that the childcare center was onsite in the hospital where I worked, and this allowed me to nurse my son on demand, and return to my desk without disruption.
a smart investment
A404-P
childcare
1
3
15,869
8,386,236
[["united", "states", "would", "look", "model", "sweden"], ["paid", "greatly", "terms", "money", "childcare", "three", "children", "throughout", "years"], ["estimate", "greater", "140,000.00", "never", "enough", "benefit", "filing", "tax", "returns"], ["minimum", "600.00", "per", "month", "one", "child", "40", "hours", "per", "week"], ["scaled", "back", "16", "hours", "week", "third", "childs", "birth", "take", "home", "pay", "one", "dollar", "per", "hour"], ["due", "cost", "healthcare", "premiums", "childcare", "cost"], ["ray", "sunshine", "childcare", "center", "onsite", "hospital", "worked", "allowed", "nurse", "son", "demand", "return", "desk", "without", "disruption"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "JJR", "CD", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "IN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NN"], ["VBD", "RB", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "IN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN"]]
united states would look model sweden. paid greatly terms money childcare three children throughout years. estimate greater 140,000.00 never enough benefit filing tax returns. minimum 600.00 per month one child 40 hours per week. scaled back 16 hours week third childs birth take home pay one dollar per hour. due cost healthcare premiums childcare cost. ray sunshine childcare center onsite hospital worked allowed nurse son demand return desk without disruption
["childcare"]
childcare
1
1
Kathleen
If only the United States would look to this model in Sweden. I have paid so greatly in terms of money for childcare for my three children throughout the years. I estimate it to be greater than $140,000.00, and it was never enough to benefit me when filing tax returns. It was a minimum of $600.00 per month for one child, at 40 hours per week. When I scaled back to 16 hours a week after my third childs birth, my take home pay was one dollar per hour. This was due to the cost of healthcare premiums and childcare cost. The ray of sunshine in this was that the childcare center was onsite in the hospital where I worked, and this allowed me to nurse my son on demand, and return to my desk without disruption.
a smart investment
A404-P
child care cost
0
2
15,870
8,386,236
[["united", "states", "would", "look", "model", "sweden"], ["paid", "greatly", "terms", "money", "childcare", "three", "children", "throughout", "years"], ["estimate", "greater", "140,000.00", "never", "enough", "benefit", "filing", "tax", "returns"], ["minimum", "600.00", "per", "month", "one", "child", "40", "hours", "per", "week"], ["scaled", "back", "16", "hours", "week", "third", "childs", "birth", "take", "home", "pay", "one", "dollar", "per", "hour"], ["due", "cost", "healthcare", "premiums", "childcare", "cost"], ["ray", "sunshine", "childcare", "center", "onsite", "hospital", "worked", "allowed", "nurse", "son", "demand", "return", "desk", "without", "disruption"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "JJR", "CD", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "IN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NN"], ["VBD", "RB", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "IN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN"]]
united states would look model sweden. paid greatly terms money childcare three children throughout years. estimate greater 140,000.00 never enough benefit filing tax returns. minimum 600.00 per month one child 40 hours per week. scaled back 16 hours week third childs birth take home pay one dollar per hour. due cost healthcare premiums childcare cost. ray sunshine childcare center onsite hospital worked allowed nurse son demand return desk without disruption
["child", "care", "cost"]
child care cost
1
0
Kathleen
If only the United States would look to this model in Sweden. I have paid so greatly in terms of money for childcare for my three children throughout the years. I estimate it to be greater than $140,000.00, and it was never enough to benefit me when filing tax returns. It was a minimum of $600.00 per month for one child, at 40 hours per week. When I scaled back to 16 hours a week after my third childs birth, my take home pay was one dollar per hour. This was due to the cost of healthcare premiums and childcare cost. The ray of sunshine in this was that the childcare center was onsite in the hospital where I worked, and this allowed me to nurse my son on demand, and return to my desk without disruption.
a smart investment
A404-P
health care cost
0
3
15,871
8,386,236
[["united", "states", "would", "look", "model", "sweden"], ["paid", "greatly", "terms", "money", "childcare", "three", "children", "throughout", "years"], ["estimate", "greater", "140,000.00", "never", "enough", "benefit", "filing", "tax", "returns"], ["minimum", "600.00", "per", "month", "one", "child", "40", "hours", "per", "week"], ["scaled", "back", "16", "hours", "week", "third", "childs", "birth", "take", "home", "pay", "one", "dollar", "per", "hour"], ["due", "cost", "healthcare", "premiums", "childcare", "cost"], ["ray", "sunshine", "childcare", "center", "onsite", "hospital", "worked", "allowed", "nurse", "son", "demand", "return", "desk", "without", "disruption"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "JJR", "CD", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "IN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NN"], ["VBD", "RB", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "IN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN"]]
united states would look model sweden. paid greatly terms money childcare three children throughout years. estimate greater 140,000.00 never enough benefit filing tax returns. minimum 600.00 per month one child 40 hours per week. scaled back 16 hours week third childs birth take home pay one dollar per hour. due cost healthcare premiums childcare cost. ray sunshine childcare center onsite hospital worked allowed nurse son demand return desk without disruption
["health", "care", "cost"]
health care cost
1
0
Kathleen
If only the United States would look to this model in Sweden. I have paid so greatly in terms of money for childcare for my three children throughout the years. I estimate it to be greater than $140,000.00, and it was never enough to benefit me when filing tax returns. It was a minimum of $600.00 per month for one child, at 40 hours per week. When I scaled back to 16 hours a week after my third childs birth, my take home pay was one dollar per hour. This was due to the cost of healthcare premiums and childcare cost. The ray of sunshine in this was that the childcare center was onsite in the hospital where I worked, and this allowed me to nurse my son on demand, and return to my desk without disruption.
public preschool
A403-P
public preschool
1
1
16,004
8,386,236
[["united", "states", "would", "look", "model", "sweden"], ["paid", "greatly", "terms", "money", "childcare", "three", "children", "throughout", "years"], ["estimate", "greater", "140,000.00", "never", "enough", "benefit", "filing", "tax", "returns"], ["minimum", "600.00", "per", "month", "one", "child", "40", "hours", "per", "week"], ["scaled", "back", "16", "hours", "week", "third", "childs", "birth", "take", "home", "pay", "one", "dollar", "per", "hour"], ["due", "cost", "healthcare", "premiums", "childcare", "cost"], ["ray", "sunshine", "childcare", "center", "onsite", "hospital", "worked", "allowed", "nurse", "son", "demand", "return", "desk", "without", "disruption"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "JJR", "CD", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "IN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NN"], ["VBD", "RB", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "IN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN"]]
united states would look model sweden. paid greatly terms money childcare three children throughout years. estimate greater 140,000.00 never enough benefit filing tax returns. minimum 600.00 per month one child 40 hours per week. scaled back 16 hours week third childs birth take home pay one dollar per hour. due cost healthcare premiums childcare cost. ray sunshine childcare center onsite hospital worked allowed nurse son demand return desk without disruption
["public", "preschool"]
public preschool
1
0
Kathleen
If only the United States would look to this model in Sweden. I have paid so greatly in terms of money for childcare for my three children throughout the years. I estimate it to be greater than $140,000.00, and it was never enough to benefit me when filing tax returns. It was a minimum of $600.00 per month for one child, at 40 hours per week. When I scaled back to 16 hours a week after my third childs birth, my take home pay was one dollar per hour. This was due to the cost of healthcare premiums and childcare cost. The ray of sunshine in this was that the childcare center was onsite in the hospital where I worked, and this allowed me to nurse my son on demand, and return to my desk without disruption.
public preschool
A403-P
swedan
1
3
16,005
8,386,236
[["united", "states", "would", "look", "model", "sweden"], ["paid", "greatly", "terms", "money", "childcare", "three", "children", "throughout", "years"], ["estimate", "greater", "140,000.00", "never", "enough", "benefit", "filing", "tax", "returns"], ["minimum", "600.00", "per", "month", "one", "child", "40", "hours", "per", "week"], ["scaled", "back", "16", "hours", "week", "third", "childs", "birth", "take", "home", "pay", "one", "dollar", "per", "hour"], ["due", "cost", "healthcare", "premiums", "childcare", "cost"], ["ray", "sunshine", "childcare", "center", "onsite", "hospital", "worked", "allowed", "nurse", "son", "demand", "return", "desk", "without", "disruption"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "JJR", "CD", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "IN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NN"], ["VBD", "RB", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "IN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN"]]
united states would look model sweden. paid greatly terms money childcare three children throughout years. estimate greater 140,000.00 never enough benefit filing tax returns. minimum 600.00 per month one child 40 hours per week. scaled back 16 hours week third childs birth take home pay one dollar per hour. due cost healthcare premiums childcare cost. ray sunshine childcare center onsite hospital worked allowed nurse son demand return desk without disruption
["sweden"]
sweden
1
1
Kathleen
If only the United States would look to this model in Sweden. I have paid so greatly in terms of money for childcare for my three children throughout the years. I estimate it to be greater than $140,000.00, and it was never enough to benefit me when filing tax returns. It was a minimum of $600.00 per month for one child, at 40 hours per week. When I scaled back to 16 hours a week after my third childs birth, my take home pay was one dollar per hour. This was due to the cost of healthcare premiums and childcare cost. The ray of sunshine in this was that the childcare center was onsite in the hospital where I worked, and this allowed me to nurse my son on demand, and return to my desk without disruption.
public preschool
A403-P
childcare
1
3
16,006
8,386,236
[["united", "states", "would", "look", "model", "sweden"], ["paid", "greatly", "terms", "money", "childcare", "three", "children", "throughout", "years"], ["estimate", "greater", "140,000.00", "never", "enough", "benefit", "filing", "tax", "returns"], ["minimum", "600.00", "per", "month", "one", "child", "40", "hours", "per", "week"], ["scaled", "back", "16", "hours", "week", "third", "childs", "birth", "take", "home", "pay", "one", "dollar", "per", "hour"], ["due", "cost", "healthcare", "premiums", "childcare", "cost"], ["ray", "sunshine", "childcare", "center", "onsite", "hospital", "worked", "allowed", "nurse", "son", "demand", "return", "desk", "without", "disruption"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "MD", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["VBN", "RB", "NNS", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "JJR", "CD", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "IN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "CD", "NNS", "IN", "NN"], ["VBD", "RB", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN", "NN", "CD", "NN", "IN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBD", "VBD", "VB", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NN", "IN", "NN"]]
united states would look model sweden. paid greatly terms money childcare three children throughout years. estimate greater 140,000.00 never enough benefit filing tax returns. minimum 600.00 per month one child 40 hours per week. scaled back 16 hours week third childs birth take home pay one dollar per hour. due cost healthcare premiums childcare cost. ray sunshine childcare center onsite hospital worked allowed nurse son demand return desk without disruption
["childcare"]
childcare
1
1
Chuck Merrill
I agree with McCluskey. It is unconstitutional intrusion. If Republicans back the idea, they definitely have not gotten the message. The federal government should not be financing education, either directly through grants or indirectly through tax credits. Education is a 100% responsibility and obligation of the states. I do support tax credits by the separate states, however. Home schooled children should get the same state financial backing given to public school attendees, and yes, that would be a threat to public education. So be it. They need the threat.
home schoolers
A5127-P
home schoolers
0
1
16,919
3,176,133
[["agree", "mccluskey"], ["unconstitutional", "intrusion"], ["republicans", "back", "idea", "definitely", "gotten", "message"], ["federal", "government", "financing", "education", "either", "directly", "grants", "indirectly", "tax", "credits"], ["education", "100", "responsibility", "obligation", "states"], ["support", "tax", "credits", "separate", "states", "however"], ["home", "schooled", "children", "get", "state", "financial", "backing", "given", "public", "school", "attendees", "yes", "would", "threat", "public", "education"], ["need", "threat"]]
[["VBP", "NNP"], ["JJ", "NN"], ["NNPS", "VBP", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "CC", "RB", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "RB"], ["NN", "VBD", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "UH", "MD", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBP", "NN"]]
agree mccluskey. unconstitutional intrusion. republicans back idea definitely gotten message. federal government financing education either directly grants indirectly tax credits. education 100 responsibility obligation states. support tax credits separate states however. home schooled children get state financial backing given public school attendees yes would threat public education. need threat
["home", "schoolers"]
home schoolers
1
0
Chuck Merrill
I agree with McCluskey. It is unconstitutional intrusion. If Republicans back the idea, they definitely have not gotten the message. The federal government should not be financing education, either directly through grants or indirectly through tax credits. Education is a 100% responsibility and obligation of the states. I do support tax credits by the separate states, however. Home schooled children should get the same state financial backing given to public school attendees, and yes, that would be a threat to public education. So be it. They need the threat.
home schoolers
A5127-P
education
1
3
16,920
3,176,133
[["agree", "mccluskey"], ["unconstitutional", "intrusion"], ["republicans", "back", "idea", "definitely", "gotten", "message"], ["federal", "government", "financing", "education", "either", "directly", "grants", "indirectly", "tax", "credits"], ["education", "100", "responsibility", "obligation", "states"], ["support", "tax", "credits", "separate", "states", "however"], ["home", "schooled", "children", "get", "state", "financial", "backing", "given", "public", "school", "attendees", "yes", "would", "threat", "public", "education"], ["need", "threat"]]
[["VBP", "NNP"], ["JJ", "NN"], ["NNPS", "VBP", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "CC", "RB", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "RB"], ["NN", "VBD", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "UH", "MD", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBP", "NN"]]
agree mccluskey. unconstitutional intrusion. republicans back idea definitely gotten message. federal government financing education either directly grants indirectly tax credits. education 100 responsibility obligation states. support tax credits separate states however. home schooled children get state financial backing given public school attendees yes would threat public education. need threat
["education"]
education
1
1
Chuck Merrill
I agree with McCluskey. It is unconstitutional intrusion. If Republicans back the idea, they definitely have not gotten the message. The federal government should not be financing education, either directly through grants or indirectly through tax credits. Education is a 100% responsibility and obligation of the states. I do support tax credits by the separate states, however. Home schooled children should get the same state financial backing given to public school attendees, and yes, that would be a threat to public education. So be it. They need the threat.
home schoolers
A5127-P
financing education
0
3
16,921
3,176,133
[["agree", "mccluskey"], ["unconstitutional", "intrusion"], ["republicans", "back", "idea", "definitely", "gotten", "message"], ["federal", "government", "financing", "education", "either", "directly", "grants", "indirectly", "tax", "credits"], ["education", "100", "responsibility", "obligation", "states"], ["support", "tax", "credits", "separate", "states", "however"], ["home", "schooled", "children", "get", "state", "financial", "backing", "given", "public", "school", "attendees", "yes", "would", "threat", "public", "education"], ["need", "threat"]]
[["VBP", "NNP"], ["JJ", "NN"], ["NNPS", "VBP", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "CC", "RB", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "RB"], ["NN", "VBD", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "UH", "MD", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBP", "NN"]]
agree mccluskey. unconstitutional intrusion. republicans back idea definitely gotten message. federal government financing education either directly grants indirectly tax credits. education 100 responsibility obligation states. support tax credits separate states however. home schooled children get state financial backing given public school attendees yes would threat public education. need threat
["financing", "education"]
financing education
1
1
Chuck Merrill
I agree with McCluskey. It is unconstitutional intrusion. If Republicans back the idea, they definitely have not gotten the message. The federal government should not be financing education, either directly through grants or indirectly through tax credits. Education is a 100% responsibility and obligation of the states. I do support tax credits by the separate states, however. Home schooled children should get the same state financial backing given to public school attendees, and yes, that would be a threat to public education. So be it. They need the threat.
a tax break
A5128-P
a tax break
0
1
17,057
3,176,133
[["agree", "mccluskey"], ["unconstitutional", "intrusion"], ["republicans", "back", "idea", "definitely", "gotten", "message"], ["federal", "government", "financing", "education", "either", "directly", "grants", "indirectly", "tax", "credits"], ["education", "100", "responsibility", "obligation", "states"], ["support", "tax", "credits", "separate", "states", "however"], ["home", "schooled", "children", "get", "state", "financial", "backing", "given", "public", "school", "attendees", "yes", "would", "threat", "public", "education"], ["need", "threat"]]
[["VBP", "NNP"], ["JJ", "NN"], ["NNPS", "VBP", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "CC", "RB", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "RB"], ["NN", "VBD", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "UH", "MD", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBP", "NN"]]
agree mccluskey. unconstitutional intrusion. republicans back idea definitely gotten message. federal government financing education either directly grants indirectly tax credits. education 100 responsibility obligation states. support tax credits separate states however. home schooled children get state financial backing given public school attendees yes would threat public education. need threat
["tax", "break"]
tax break
1
0
Chuck Merrill
I agree with McCluskey. It is unconstitutional intrusion. If Republicans back the idea, they definitely have not gotten the message. The federal government should not be financing education, either directly through grants or indirectly through tax credits. Education is a 100% responsibility and obligation of the states. I do support tax credits by the separate states, however. Home schooled children should get the same state financial backing given to public school attendees, and yes, that would be a threat to public education. So be it. They need the threat.
a tax break
A5128-P
financing education
1
3
17,058
3,176,133
[["agree", "mccluskey"], ["unconstitutional", "intrusion"], ["republicans", "back", "idea", "definitely", "gotten", "message"], ["federal", "government", "financing", "education", "either", "directly", "grants", "indirectly", "tax", "credits"], ["education", "100", "responsibility", "obligation", "states"], ["support", "tax", "credits", "separate", "states", "however"], ["home", "schooled", "children", "get", "state", "financial", "backing", "given", "public", "school", "attendees", "yes", "would", "threat", "public", "education"], ["need", "threat"]]
[["VBP", "NNP"], ["JJ", "NN"], ["NNPS", "VBP", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "CC", "RB", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "RB"], ["NN", "VBD", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "UH", "MD", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBP", "NN"]]
agree mccluskey. unconstitutional intrusion. republicans back idea definitely gotten message. federal government financing education either directly grants indirectly tax credits. education 100 responsibility obligation states. support tax credits separate states however. home schooled children get state financial backing given public school attendees yes would threat public education. need threat
["financing", "education"]
financing education
1
1
Chuck Merrill
I agree with McCluskey. It is unconstitutional intrusion. If Republicans back the idea, they definitely have not gotten the message. The federal government should not be financing education, either directly through grants or indirectly through tax credits. Education is a 100% responsibility and obligation of the states. I do support tax credits by the separate states, however. Home schooled children should get the same state financial backing given to public school attendees, and yes, that would be a threat to public education. So be it. They need the threat.
a tax break
A5128-P
federal government education funding
0
3
17,059
3,176,133
[["agree", "mccluskey"], ["unconstitutional", "intrusion"], ["republicans", "back", "idea", "definitely", "gotten", "message"], ["federal", "government", "financing", "education", "either", "directly", "grants", "indirectly", "tax", "credits"], ["education", "100", "responsibility", "obligation", "states"], ["support", "tax", "credits", "separate", "states", "however"], ["home", "schooled", "children", "get", "state", "financial", "backing", "given", "public", "school", "attendees", "yes", "would", "threat", "public", "education"], ["need", "threat"]]
[["VBP", "NNP"], ["JJ", "NN"], ["NNPS", "VBP", "NN", "RB", "VBN", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "CC", "RB", "NNS", "RB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NN", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "RB"], ["NN", "VBD", "NNS", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "UH", "MD", "NN", "JJ", "NN"], ["VBP", "NN"]]
agree mccluskey. unconstitutional intrusion. republicans back idea definitely gotten message. federal government financing education either directly grants indirectly tax credits. education 100 responsibility obligation states. support tax credits separate states however. home schooled children get state financial backing given public school attendees yes would threat public education. need threat
["federal", "government", "education", "funding"]
federal government education funding
1
0
Jason
The issue isn't whether or not Cuba has a good economic system and cronies in high political office, the issue is what is the most efficacious way to encourage reform in Cuba? Clearly your way isn't working, and it has been given 50 years. Remember the definition of insanity. Furthermore, 99% of the world, as you correctly point out, believe sanctions are a bad idea. Hmmm...
sanctions
A783-P
sanctions
0
1
13,793
13,039,304
[["issue", "n't", "whether", "cuba", "good", "economic", "system", "cronies", "high", "political", "office", "issue", "efficacious", "way", "encourage", "reform", "cuba"], ["clearly", "way", "n't", "working", "given", "50", "years"], ["remember", "definition", "insanity"], ["furthermore", "99", "world", "correctly", "point", "believe", "sanctions", "bad", "idea"], ["hmmm", "..."]]
[["NN", "RB", "IN", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["RB", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "VBN", "CD", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "CD", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "."]]
issue n't whether cuba good economic system cronies high political office issue efficacious way encourage reform cuba. clearly way n't working given 50 years. remember definition insanity. furthermore 99 world correctly point believe sanctions bad idea. hmmm ...
["sanction"]
sanction
1
1
Jason
The issue isn't whether or not Cuba has a good economic system and cronies in high political office, the issue is what is the most efficacious way to encourage reform in Cuba? Clearly your way isn't working, and it has been given 50 years. Remember the definition of insanity. Furthermore, 99% of the world, as you correctly point out, believe sanctions are a bad idea. Hmmm...
sanctions
A783-P
cuba
0
3
13,794
13,039,304
[["issue", "n't", "whether", "cuba", "good", "economic", "system", "cronies", "high", "political", "office", "issue", "efficacious", "way", "encourage", "reform", "cuba"], ["clearly", "way", "n't", "working", "given", "50", "years"], ["remember", "definition", "insanity"], ["furthermore", "99", "world", "correctly", "point", "believe", "sanctions", "bad", "idea"], ["hmmm", "..."]]
[["NN", "RB", "IN", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["RB", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "VBN", "CD", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "CD", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "."]]
issue n't whether cuba good economic system cronies high political office issue efficacious way encourage reform cuba. clearly way n't working given 50 years. remember definition insanity. furthermore 99 world correctly point believe sanctions bad idea. hmmm ...
["cuba"]
cuba
1
1
Jason
The issue isn't whether or not Cuba has a good economic system and cronies in high political office, the issue is what is the most efficacious way to encourage reform in Cuba? Clearly your way isn't working, and it has been given 50 years. Remember the definition of insanity. Furthermore, 99% of the world, as you correctly point out, believe sanctions are a bad idea. Hmmm...
sanctions
A783-P
cuba's economic system
0
3
13,795
13,039,304
[["issue", "n't", "whether", "cuba", "good", "economic", "system", "cronies", "high", "political", "office", "issue", "efficacious", "way", "encourage", "reform", "cuba"], ["clearly", "way", "n't", "working", "given", "50", "years"], ["remember", "definition", "insanity"], ["furthermore", "99", "world", "correctly", "point", "believe", "sanctions", "bad", "idea"], ["hmmm", "..."]]
[["NN", "RB", "IN", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["RB", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "VBN", "CD", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "CD", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "."]]
issue n't whether cuba good economic system cronies high political office issue efficacious way encourage reform cuba. clearly way n't working given 50 years. remember definition insanity. furthermore 99 world correctly point believe sanctions bad idea. hmmm ...
["cuba", "'s", "economic", "system"]
cuba 's economic system
1
0
Jason
The issue isn't whether or not Cuba has a good economic system and cronies in high political office, the issue is what is the most efficacious way to encourage reform in Cuba? Clearly your way isn't working, and it has been given 50 years. Remember the definition of insanity. Furthermore, 99% of the world, as you correctly point out, believe sanctions are a bad idea. Hmmm...
sanctions
A783-P
reform in cuba
0
3
13,796
13,039,304
[["issue", "n't", "whether", "cuba", "good", "economic", "system", "cronies", "high", "political", "office", "issue", "efficacious", "way", "encourage", "reform", "cuba"], ["clearly", "way", "n't", "working", "given", "50", "years"], ["remember", "definition", "insanity"], ["furthermore", "99", "world", "correctly", "point", "believe", "sanctions", "bad", "idea"], ["hmmm", "..."]]
[["NN", "RB", "IN", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["RB", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "VBN", "CD", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "CD", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "."]]
issue n't whether cuba good economic system cronies high political office issue efficacious way encourage reform cuba. clearly way n't working given 50 years. remember definition insanity. furthermore 99 world correctly point believe sanctions bad idea. hmmm ...
["reform", "cuba"]
reform cuba
1
1
Jason
The issue isn't whether or not Cuba has a good economic system and cronies in high political office, the issue is what is the most efficacious way to encourage reform in Cuba? Clearly your way isn't working, and it has been given 50 years. Remember the definition of insanity. Furthermore, 99% of the world, as you correctly point out, believe sanctions are a bad idea. Hmmm...
the u.s.
A782-P
the u.s.
0
1
14,258
13,039,304
[["issue", "n't", "whether", "cuba", "good", "economic", "system", "cronies", "high", "political", "office", "issue", "efficacious", "way", "encourage", "reform", "cuba"], ["clearly", "way", "n't", "working", "given", "50", "years"], ["remember", "definition", "insanity"], ["furthermore", "99", "world", "correctly", "point", "believe", "sanctions", "bad", "idea"], ["hmmm", "..."]]
[["NN", "RB", "IN", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["RB", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "VBN", "CD", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "CD", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "."]]
issue n't whether cuba good economic system cronies high political office issue efficacious way encourage reform cuba. clearly way n't working given 50 years. remember definition insanity. furthermore 99 world correctly point believe sanctions bad idea. hmmm ...
["u.s"]
u.s
1
0
Jason
The issue isn't whether or not Cuba has a good economic system and cronies in high political office, the issue is what is the most efficacious way to encourage reform in Cuba? Clearly your way isn't working, and it has been given 50 years. Remember the definition of insanity. Furthermore, 99% of the world, as you correctly point out, believe sanctions are a bad idea. Hmmm...
the u.s.
A782-P
cuba
0
3
14,259
13,039,304
[["issue", "n't", "whether", "cuba", "good", "economic", "system", "cronies", "high", "political", "office", "issue", "efficacious", "way", "encourage", "reform", "cuba"], ["clearly", "way", "n't", "working", "given", "50", "years"], ["remember", "definition", "insanity"], ["furthermore", "99", "world", "correctly", "point", "believe", "sanctions", "bad", "idea"], ["hmmm", "..."]]
[["NN", "RB", "IN", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["RB", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "VBN", "CD", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "CD", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "."]]
issue n't whether cuba good economic system cronies high political office issue efficacious way encourage reform cuba. clearly way n't working given 50 years. remember definition insanity. furthermore 99 world correctly point believe sanctions bad idea. hmmm ...
["cuba"]
cuba
1
1
Jason
The issue isn't whether or not Cuba has a good economic system and cronies in high political office, the issue is what is the most efficacious way to encourage reform in Cuba? Clearly your way isn't working, and it has been given 50 years. Remember the definition of insanity. Furthermore, 99% of the world, as you correctly point out, believe sanctions are a bad idea. Hmmm...
the u.s.
A782-P
reform in cuba
1
2
14,260
13,039,304
[["issue", "n't", "whether", "cuba", "good", "economic", "system", "cronies", "high", "political", "office", "issue", "efficacious", "way", "encourage", "reform", "cuba"], ["clearly", "way", "n't", "working", "given", "50", "years"], ["remember", "definition", "insanity"], ["furthermore", "99", "world", "correctly", "point", "believe", "sanctions", "bad", "idea"], ["hmmm", "..."]]
[["NN", "RB", "IN", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["RB", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "VBN", "CD", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "CD", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "."]]
issue n't whether cuba good economic system cronies high political office issue efficacious way encourage reform cuba. clearly way n't working given 50 years. remember definition insanity. furthermore 99 world correctly point believe sanctions bad idea. hmmm ...
["reform", "cuba"]
reform cuba
1
1
Jason
The issue isn't whether or not Cuba has a good economic system and cronies in high political office, the issue is what is the most efficacious way to encourage reform in Cuba? Clearly your way isn't working, and it has been given 50 years. Remember the definition of insanity. Furthermore, 99% of the world, as you correctly point out, believe sanctions are a bad idea. Hmmm...
the u.s.
A782-P
cuba
1
3
14,261
13,039,304
[["issue", "n't", "whether", "cuba", "good", "economic", "system", "cronies", "high", "political", "office", "issue", "efficacious", "way", "encourage", "reform", "cuba"], ["clearly", "way", "n't", "working", "given", "50", "years"], ["remember", "definition", "insanity"], ["furthermore", "99", "world", "correctly", "point", "believe", "sanctions", "bad", "idea"], ["hmmm", "..."]]
[["NN", "RB", "IN", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNP"], ["RB", "NN", "RB", "VBG", "VBN", "CD", "NNS"], ["VB", "NN", "NN"], ["RB", "CD", "NN", "RB", "VBP", "VB", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["UH", "."]]
issue n't whether cuba good economic system cronies high political office issue efficacious way encourage reform cuba. clearly way n't working given 50 years. remember definition insanity. furthermore 99 world correctly point believe sanctions bad idea. hmmm ...
["cuba"]
cuba
1
1
misfit
"Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security." Is the Author suggesting that Israel doesn't fulfill the requirements for being a State? Israel barely fulfills any of the three requirements the Author considers "essential elements" for being a State: 1. Strong Government - Israel has a history of weak coalition governments, with the major parties hostage to extremist fringe minor partners. 2. Defined Borders - What are Israel's borders? '67 Armistice Lines? East Jerusalem? Settlements? 3. Security - The Israeli government keep claiming that Israel is under constant existential treat from its neighbors. PS Israel fulfilled non of these requirements when it was declared a State by the UN.
a palestinian state
A2134-P
a palestinian state
1
1
5,969
13,080,274
[["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["author", "suggesting", "israel", "n't", "fulfill", "requirements", "state"], ["israel", "barely", "fulfills", "three", "requirements", "author", "considers", "essential", "elements", "state", "1"], ["strong", "government", "israel", "history", "weak", "coalition", "governments", "major", "parties", "hostage", "extremist", "fringe", "minor", "partners"], ["2"], ["defined", "borders", "israel", "'s", "borders"], ["67", "armistice", "lines"], ["east", "jerusalem"], ["settlements"], ["3"], ["security", "israeli", "government", "keep", "claiming", "israel", "constant", "existential", "treat", "neighbors"], ["ps", "israel", "fulfilled", "non", "requirements", "declared", "state", "un"]]
[["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NNP", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "NN"], ["NNP", "RB", "VBZ", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "CD"], ["JJ", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS"], ["LS"], ["VBN", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP"], ["NNS"], ["LS"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBD", "AFX", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NNP"]]
nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. author suggesting israel n't fulfill requirements state. israel barely fulfills three requirements author considers essential elements state 1. strong government israel history weak coalition governments major parties hostage extremist fringe minor partners. 2. defined borders israel 's borders. 67 armistice lines. east jerusalem. settlements. 3. security israeli government keep claiming israel constant existential treat neighbors. ps israel fulfilled non requirements declared state un
["palestinian", "state"]
palestinian state
1
0
misfit
"Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security." Is the Author suggesting that Israel doesn't fulfill the requirements for being a State? Israel barely fulfills any of the three requirements the Author considers "essential elements" for being a State: 1. Strong Government - Israel has a history of weak coalition governments, with the major parties hostage to extremist fringe minor partners. 2. Defined Borders - What are Israel's borders? '67 Armistice Lines? East Jerusalem? Settlements? 3. Security - The Israeli government keep claiming that Israel is under constant existential treat from its neighbors. PS Israel fulfilled non of these requirements when it was declared a State by the UN.
a palestinian state
A2134-P
independent nations
1
3
5,970
13,080,274
[["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["author", "suggesting", "israel", "n't", "fulfill", "requirements", "state"], ["israel", "barely", "fulfills", "three", "requirements", "author", "considers", "essential", "elements", "state", "1"], ["strong", "government", "israel", "history", "weak", "coalition", "governments", "major", "parties", "hostage", "extremist", "fringe", "minor", "partners"], ["2"], ["defined", "borders", "israel", "'s", "borders"], ["67", "armistice", "lines"], ["east", "jerusalem"], ["settlements"], ["3"], ["security", "israeli", "government", "keep", "claiming", "israel", "constant", "existential", "treat", "neighbors"], ["ps", "israel", "fulfilled", "non", "requirements", "declared", "state", "un"]]
[["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NNP", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "NN"], ["NNP", "RB", "VBZ", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "CD"], ["JJ", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS"], ["LS"], ["VBN", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP"], ["NNS"], ["LS"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBD", "AFX", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NNP"]]
nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. author suggesting israel n't fulfill requirements state. israel barely fulfills three requirements author considers essential elements state 1. strong government israel history weak coalition governments major parties hostage extremist fringe minor partners. 2. defined borders israel 's borders. 67 armistice lines. east jerusalem. settlements. 3. security israeli government keep claiming israel constant existential treat neighbors. ps israel fulfilled non requirements declared state un
["independent", "nation"]
independent nation
1
0
misfit
"Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security." Is the Author suggesting that Israel doesn't fulfill the requirements for being a State? Israel barely fulfills any of the three requirements the Author considers "essential elements" for being a State: 1. Strong Government - Israel has a history of weak coalition governments, with the major parties hostage to extremist fringe minor partners. 2. Defined Borders - What are Israel's borders? '67 Armistice Lines? East Jerusalem? Settlements? 3. Security - The Israeli government keep claiming that Israel is under constant existential treat from its neighbors. PS Israel fulfilled non of these requirements when it was declared a State by the UN.
a palestinian state
A2134-P
national independence
1
3
5,971
13,080,274
[["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["author", "suggesting", "israel", "n't", "fulfill", "requirements", "state"], ["israel", "barely", "fulfills", "three", "requirements", "author", "considers", "essential", "elements", "state", "1"], ["strong", "government", "israel", "history", "weak", "coalition", "governments", "major", "parties", "hostage", "extremist", "fringe", "minor", "partners"], ["2"], ["defined", "borders", "israel", "'s", "borders"], ["67", "armistice", "lines"], ["east", "jerusalem"], ["settlements"], ["3"], ["security", "israeli", "government", "keep", "claiming", "israel", "constant", "existential", "treat", "neighbors"], ["ps", "israel", "fulfilled", "non", "requirements", "declared", "state", "un"]]
[["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NNP", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "NN"], ["NNP", "RB", "VBZ", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "CD"], ["JJ", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS"], ["LS"], ["VBN", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP"], ["NNS"], ["LS"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBD", "AFX", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NNP"]]
nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. author suggesting israel n't fulfill requirements state. israel barely fulfills three requirements author considers essential elements state 1. strong government israel history weak coalition governments major parties hostage extremist fringe minor partners. 2. defined borders israel 's borders. 67 armistice lines. east jerusalem. settlements. 3. security israeli government keep claiming israel constant existential treat neighbors. ps israel fulfilled non requirements declared state un
["national", "independence"]
national independence
1
0
misfit
"Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security." Is the Author suggesting that Israel doesn't fulfill the requirements for being a State? Israel barely fulfills any of the three requirements the Author considers "essential elements" for being a State: 1. Strong Government - Israel has a history of weak coalition governments, with the major parties hostage to extremist fringe minor partners. 2. Defined Borders - What are Israel's borders? '67 Armistice Lines? East Jerusalem? Settlements? 3. Security - The Israeli government keep claiming that Israel is under constant existential treat from its neighbors. PS Israel fulfilled non of these requirements when it was declared a State by the UN.
nations
A2133-P
nations
0
1
6,235
13,080,274
[["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["author", "suggesting", "israel", "n't", "fulfill", "requirements", "state"], ["israel", "barely", "fulfills", "three", "requirements", "author", "considers", "essential", "elements", "state", "1"], ["strong", "government", "israel", "history", "weak", "coalition", "governments", "major", "parties", "hostage", "extremist", "fringe", "minor", "partners"], ["2"], ["defined", "borders", "israel", "'s", "borders"], ["67", "armistice", "lines"], ["east", "jerusalem"], ["settlements"], ["3"], ["security", "israeli", "government", "keep", "claiming", "israel", "constant", "existential", "treat", "neighbors"], ["ps", "israel", "fulfilled", "non", "requirements", "declared", "state", "un"]]
[["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NNP", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "NN"], ["NNP", "RB", "VBZ", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "CD"], ["JJ", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS"], ["LS"], ["VBN", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP"], ["NNS"], ["LS"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBD", "AFX", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NNP"]]
nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. author suggesting israel n't fulfill requirements state. israel barely fulfills three requirements author considers essential elements state 1. strong government israel history weak coalition governments major parties hostage extremist fringe minor partners. 2. defined borders israel 's borders. 67 armistice lines. east jerusalem. settlements. 3. security israeli government keep claiming israel constant existential treat neighbors. ps israel fulfilled non requirements declared state un
["nation"]
nation
1
1
misfit
"Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security." Is the Author suggesting that Israel doesn't fulfill the requirements for being a State? Israel barely fulfills any of the three requirements the Author considers "essential elements" for being a State: 1. Strong Government - Israel has a history of weak coalition governments, with the major parties hostage to extremist fringe minor partners. 2. Defined Borders - What are Israel's borders? '67 Armistice Lines? East Jerusalem? Settlements? 3. Security - The Israeli government keep claiming that Israel is under constant existential treat from its neighbors. PS Israel fulfilled non of these requirements when it was declared a State by the UN.
nations
A2133-P
israel
0
3
6,236
13,080,274
[["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["author", "suggesting", "israel", "n't", "fulfill", "requirements", "state"], ["israel", "barely", "fulfills", "three", "requirements", "author", "considers", "essential", "elements", "state", "1"], ["strong", "government", "israel", "history", "weak", "coalition", "governments", "major", "parties", "hostage", "extremist", "fringe", "minor", "partners"], ["2"], ["defined", "borders", "israel", "'s", "borders"], ["67", "armistice", "lines"], ["east", "jerusalem"], ["settlements"], ["3"], ["security", "israeli", "government", "keep", "claiming", "israel", "constant", "existential", "treat", "neighbors"], ["ps", "israel", "fulfilled", "non", "requirements", "declared", "state", "un"]]
[["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NNP", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "NN"], ["NNP", "RB", "VBZ", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "CD"], ["JJ", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS"], ["LS"], ["VBN", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP"], ["NNS"], ["LS"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBD", "AFX", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NNP"]]
nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. author suggesting israel n't fulfill requirements state. israel barely fulfills three requirements author considers essential elements state 1. strong government israel history weak coalition governments major parties hostage extremist fringe minor partners. 2. defined borders israel 's borders. 67 armistice lines. east jerusalem. settlements. 3. security israeli government keep claiming israel constant existential treat neighbors. ps israel fulfilled non requirements declared state un
["israel"]
israel
1
1
misfit
"Any nation wishing to declare independence should meet three essential elements: a strong central government, control of defined territory and security." Is the Author suggesting that Israel doesn't fulfill the requirements for being a State? Israel barely fulfills any of the three requirements the Author considers "essential elements" for being a State: 1. Strong Government - Israel has a history of weak coalition governments, with the major parties hostage to extremist fringe minor partners. 2. Defined Borders - What are Israel's borders? '67 Armistice Lines? East Jerusalem? Settlements? 3. Security - The Israeli government keep claiming that Israel is under constant existential treat from its neighbors. PS Israel fulfilled non of these requirements when it was declared a State by the UN.
nations
A2133-P
israel as a strong central government
0
3
6,237
13,080,274
[["nation", "wishing", "declare", "independence", "meet", "three", "essential", "elements", "strong", "central", "government", "control", "defined", "territory", "security"], ["author", "suggesting", "israel", "n't", "fulfill", "requirements", "state"], ["israel", "barely", "fulfills", "three", "requirements", "author", "considers", "essential", "elements", "state", "1"], ["strong", "government", "israel", "history", "weak", "coalition", "governments", "major", "parties", "hostage", "extremist", "fringe", "minor", "partners"], ["2"], ["defined", "borders", "israel", "'s", "borders"], ["67", "armistice", "lines"], ["east", "jerusalem"], ["settlements"], ["3"], ["security", "israeli", "government", "keep", "claiming", "israel", "constant", "existential", "treat", "neighbors"], ["ps", "israel", "fulfilled", "non", "requirements", "declared", "state", "un"]]
[["NN", "VBG", "VB", "NN", "VB", "CD", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VBN", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NNP", "RB", "VB", "NNS", "NN"], ["NNP", "RB", "VBZ", "CD", "NNS", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "CD"], ["JJ", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VB", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS"], ["LS"], ["VBN", "NNP", "NNP", "POS", "NNS"], ["CD", "NNP", "NNP"], ["NNP", "NNP"], ["NNS"], ["LS"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "NNP", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNP", "NNP", "VBD", "AFX", "NNS", "VBN", "NN", "NNP"]]
nation wishing declare independence meet three essential elements strong central government control defined territory security. author suggesting israel n't fulfill requirements state. israel barely fulfills three requirements author considers essential elements state 1. strong government israel history weak coalition governments major parties hostage extremist fringe minor partners. 2. defined borders israel 's borders. 67 armistice lines. east jerusalem. settlements. 3. security israeli government keep claiming israel constant existential treat neighbors. ps israel fulfilled non requirements declared state un
["israel", "strong", "central", "government"]
israel strong central government
1
0
CAMeyer
Brandeis University should be embarrassed to have given a post to someone who employs such specious reasoning. The analogy between breastfeeding and vaccination is clearly false. A mother's decision whether to breastfeed affects only her child's health. Parents' decision not to vaccinate their child affects not only that child but other children and adults. In our society, parents can perceive that any risks, however minuscule and unproven, outweigh benefits of vaccination only because other individuals have agreed to vaccinate their children and thereby reduce or eliminate risk of a communicable disease in a population.
mandatory for all children
A1516-P
mandatory for all children
1
1
380
11,409,111
[["brandeis", "university", "embarrassed", "given", "post", "someone", "employs", "specious", "reasoning"], ["analogy", "breastfeeding", "vaccination", "clearly", "false"], ["mother", "'s", "decision", "whether", "breastfeed", "affects", "child", "'s", "health"], ["parents", "decision", "vaccinate", "child", "affects", "child", "children", "adults"], ["society", "parents", "perceive", "risks", "however", "minuscule", "unproven", "outweigh", "benefits", "vaccination", "individuals", "agreed", "vaccinate", "children", "thereby", "reduce", "eliminate", "risk", "communicable", "disease", "population"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "IN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "NN"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"], ["NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
brandeis university embarrassed given post someone employs specious reasoning. analogy breastfeeding vaccination clearly false. mother 's decision whether breastfeed affects child 's health. parents decision vaccinate child affects child children adults. society parents perceive risks however minuscule unproven outweigh benefits vaccination individuals agreed vaccinate children thereby reduce eliminate risk communicable disease population
["mandatory", "child"]
mandatory child
1
0
CAMeyer
Brandeis University should be embarrassed to have given a post to someone who employs such specious reasoning. The analogy between breastfeeding and vaccination is clearly false. A mother's decision whether to breastfeed affects only her child's health. Parents' decision not to vaccinate their child affects not only that child but other children and adults. In our society, parents can perceive that any risks, however minuscule and unproven, outweigh benefits of vaccination only because other individuals have agreed to vaccinate their children and thereby reduce or eliminate risk of a communicable disease in a population.
mandatory for all children
A1516-P
vaccine
1
3
381
11,409,111
[["brandeis", "university", "embarrassed", "given", "post", "someone", "employs", "specious", "reasoning"], ["analogy", "breastfeeding", "vaccination", "clearly", "false"], ["mother", "'s", "decision", "whether", "breastfeed", "affects", "child", "'s", "health"], ["parents", "decision", "vaccinate", "child", "affects", "child", "children", "adults"], ["society", "parents", "perceive", "risks", "however", "minuscule", "unproven", "outweigh", "benefits", "vaccination", "individuals", "agreed", "vaccinate", "children", "thereby", "reduce", "eliminate", "risk", "communicable", "disease", "population"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "IN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "NN"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"], ["NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
brandeis university embarrassed given post someone employs specious reasoning. analogy breastfeeding vaccination clearly false. mother 's decision whether breastfeed affects child 's health. parents decision vaccinate child affects child children adults. society parents perceive risks however minuscule unproven outweigh benefits vaccination individuals agreed vaccinate children thereby reduce eliminate risk communicable disease population
["vaccine"]
vaccine
1
0
CAMeyer
Brandeis University should be embarrassed to have given a post to someone who employs such specious reasoning. The analogy between breastfeeding and vaccination is clearly false. A mother's decision whether to breastfeed affects only her child's health. Parents' decision not to vaccinate their child affects not only that child but other children and adults. In our society, parents can perceive that any risks, however minuscule and unproven, outweigh benefits of vaccination only because other individuals have agreed to vaccinate their children and thereby reduce or eliminate risk of a communicable disease in a population.
mandatory for all children
A1516-P
vaccination
1
2
382
11,409,111
[["brandeis", "university", "embarrassed", "given", "post", "someone", "employs", "specious", "reasoning"], ["analogy", "breastfeeding", "vaccination", "clearly", "false"], ["mother", "'s", "decision", "whether", "breastfeed", "affects", "child", "'s", "health"], ["parents", "decision", "vaccinate", "child", "affects", "child", "children", "adults"], ["society", "parents", "perceive", "risks", "however", "minuscule", "unproven", "outweigh", "benefits", "vaccination", "individuals", "agreed", "vaccinate", "children", "thereby", "reduce", "eliminate", "risk", "communicable", "disease", "population"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "IN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "NN"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"], ["NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
brandeis university embarrassed given post someone employs specious reasoning. analogy breastfeeding vaccination clearly false. mother 's decision whether breastfeed affects child 's health. parents decision vaccinate child affects child children adults. society parents perceive risks however minuscule unproven outweigh benefits vaccination individuals agreed vaccinate children thereby reduce eliminate risk communicable disease population
["vaccination"]
vaccination
1
1
CAMeyer
Brandeis University should be embarrassed to have given a post to someone who employs such specious reasoning. The analogy between breastfeeding and vaccination is clearly false. A mother's decision whether to breastfeed affects only her child's health. Parents' decision not to vaccinate their child affects not only that child but other children and adults. In our society, parents can perceive that any risks, however minuscule and unproven, outweigh benefits of vaccination only because other individuals have agreed to vaccinate their children and thereby reduce or eliminate risk of a communicable disease in a population.
mandatory for all children
A1516-P
child
1
3
383
11,409,111
[["brandeis", "university", "embarrassed", "given", "post", "someone", "employs", "specious", "reasoning"], ["analogy", "breastfeeding", "vaccination", "clearly", "false"], ["mother", "'s", "decision", "whether", "breastfeed", "affects", "child", "'s", "health"], ["parents", "decision", "vaccinate", "child", "affects", "child", "children", "adults"], ["society", "parents", "perceive", "risks", "however", "minuscule", "unproven", "outweigh", "benefits", "vaccination", "individuals", "agreed", "vaccinate", "children", "thereby", "reduce", "eliminate", "risk", "communicable", "disease", "population"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "IN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "NN"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"], ["NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
brandeis university embarrassed given post someone employs specious reasoning. analogy breastfeeding vaccination clearly false. mother 's decision whether breastfeed affects child 's health. parents decision vaccinate child affects child children adults. society parents perceive risks however minuscule unproven outweigh benefits vaccination individuals agreed vaccinate children thereby reduce eliminate risk communicable disease population
["child"]
child
1
1
CAMeyer
Brandeis University should be embarrassed to have given a post to someone who employs such specious reasoning. The analogy between breastfeeding and vaccination is clearly false. A mother's decision whether to breastfeed affects only her child's health. Parents' decision not to vaccinate their child affects not only that child but other children and adults. In our society, parents can perceive that any risks, however minuscule and unproven, outweigh benefits of vaccination only because other individuals have agreed to vaccinate their children and thereby reduce or eliminate risk of a communicable disease in a population.
vaccination
A1515-P
vaccination
1
1
453
11,409,111
[["brandeis", "university", "embarrassed", "given", "post", "someone", "employs", "specious", "reasoning"], ["analogy", "breastfeeding", "vaccination", "clearly", "false"], ["mother", "'s", "decision", "whether", "breastfeed", "affects", "child", "'s", "health"], ["parents", "decision", "vaccinate", "child", "affects", "child", "children", "adults"], ["society", "parents", "perceive", "risks", "however", "minuscule", "unproven", "outweigh", "benefits", "vaccination", "individuals", "agreed", "vaccinate", "children", "thereby", "reduce", "eliminate", "risk", "communicable", "disease", "population"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "IN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "NN"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"], ["NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
brandeis university embarrassed given post someone employs specious reasoning. analogy breastfeeding vaccination clearly false. mother 's decision whether breastfeed affects child 's health. parents decision vaccinate child affects child children adults. society parents perceive risks however minuscule unproven outweigh benefits vaccination individuals agreed vaccinate children thereby reduce eliminate risk communicable disease population
["vaccination"]
vaccination
1
1
CAMeyer
Brandeis University should be embarrassed to have given a post to someone who employs such specious reasoning. The analogy between breastfeeding and vaccination is clearly false. A mother's decision whether to breastfeed affects only her child's health. Parents' decision not to vaccinate their child affects not only that child but other children and adults. In our society, parents can perceive that any risks, however minuscule and unproven, outweigh benefits of vaccination only because other individuals have agreed to vaccinate their children and thereby reduce or eliminate risk of a communicable disease in a population.
vaccination
A1515-P
brandeis university
1
3
454
11,409,111
[["brandeis", "university", "embarrassed", "given", "post", "someone", "employs", "specious", "reasoning"], ["analogy", "breastfeeding", "vaccination", "clearly", "false"], ["mother", "'s", "decision", "whether", "breastfeed", "affects", "child", "'s", "health"], ["parents", "decision", "vaccinate", "child", "affects", "child", "children", "adults"], ["society", "parents", "perceive", "risks", "however", "minuscule", "unproven", "outweigh", "benefits", "vaccination", "individuals", "agreed", "vaccinate", "children", "thereby", "reduce", "eliminate", "risk", "communicable", "disease", "population"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "IN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "NN"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"], ["NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
brandeis university embarrassed given post someone employs specious reasoning. analogy breastfeeding vaccination clearly false. mother 's decision whether breastfeed affects child 's health. parents decision vaccinate child affects child children adults. society parents perceive risks however minuscule unproven outweigh benefits vaccination individuals agreed vaccinate children thereby reduce eliminate risk communicable disease population
["brandeis", "university"]
brandeis university
1
1
CAMeyer
Brandeis University should be embarrassed to have given a post to someone who employs such specious reasoning. The analogy between breastfeeding and vaccination is clearly false. A mother's decision whether to breastfeed affects only her child's health. Parents' decision not to vaccinate their child affects not only that child but other children and adults. In our society, parents can perceive that any risks, however minuscule and unproven, outweigh benefits of vaccination only because other individuals have agreed to vaccinate their children and thereby reduce or eliminate risk of a communicable disease in a population.
vaccination
A1515-P
breastfeed
1
3
455
11,409,111
[["brandeis", "university", "embarrassed", "given", "post", "someone", "employs", "specious", "reasoning"], ["analogy", "breastfeeding", "vaccination", "clearly", "false"], ["mother", "'s", "decision", "whether", "breastfeed", "affects", "child", "'s", "health"], ["parents", "decision", "vaccinate", "child", "affects", "child", "children", "adults"], ["society", "parents", "perceive", "risks", "however", "minuscule", "unproven", "outweigh", "benefits", "vaccination", "individuals", "agreed", "vaccinate", "children", "thereby", "reduce", "eliminate", "risk", "communicable", "disease", "population"]]
[["NNP", "NNP", "JJ", "VBN", "NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "VBG", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "IN", "VB", "NNS", "NN", "POS", "NN"], ["NNS", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "NNS"], ["NN", "NNS", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "JJ", "JJ", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "VB", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"]]
brandeis university embarrassed given post someone employs specious reasoning. analogy breastfeeding vaccination clearly false. mother 's decision whether breastfeed affects child 's health. parents decision vaccinate child affects child children adults. society parents perceive risks however minuscule unproven outweigh benefits vaccination individuals agreed vaccinate children thereby reduce eliminate risk communicable disease population
["breastfeed"]
breastfeed
1
1
Joe
If media outlets would be fair and objective and report the news, there would be no need to to Facebook and see what others are talking about. Facebook is a democratization of the news in the sense that you can find stories and opinions that the corporate media are too afraid or intimidated or just plain arrogantly refusing to cover. Bernie Sanders is just one example NYT. Please wake up and do the right thing before you become irrelevant.
newspapers
A1738-P
newspapers
0
1
4,433
18,552,535
[["media", "outlets", "would", "fair", "objective", "report", "news", "would", "need", "facebook", "see", "others", "talking"], ["facebook", "democratization", "news", "sense", "find", "stories", "opinions", "corporate", "media", "afraid", "intimidated", "plain", "arrogantly", "refusing", "cover"], ["bernie", "sanders", "one", "example", "nyt"], ["please", "wake", "right", "thing", "become", "irrelevant"]]
[["NNS", "NNS", "MD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNP", "VB", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "RB", "VBG", "VB"], ["NNP", "NNP", "CD", "NN", "NNP"], ["UH", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ"]]
media outlets would fair objective report news would need facebook see others talking. facebook democratization news sense find stories opinions corporate media afraid intimidated plain arrogantly refusing cover. bernie sanders one example nyt. please wake right thing become irrelevant
["newspaper"]
newspaper
1
0
Joe
If media outlets would be fair and objective and report the news, there would be no need to to Facebook and see what others are talking about. Facebook is a democratization of the news in the sense that you can find stories and opinions that the corporate media are too afraid or intimidated or just plain arrogantly refusing to cover. Bernie Sanders is just one example NYT. Please wake up and do the right thing before you become irrelevant.
newspapers
A1738-P
social media
0
3
4,434
18,552,535
[["media", "outlets", "would", "fair", "objective", "report", "news", "would", "need", "facebook", "see", "others", "talking"], ["facebook", "democratization", "news", "sense", "find", "stories", "opinions", "corporate", "media", "afraid", "intimidated", "plain", "arrogantly", "refusing", "cover"], ["bernie", "sanders", "one", "example", "nyt"], ["please", "wake", "right", "thing", "become", "irrelevant"]]
[["NNS", "NNS", "MD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNP", "VB", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "RB", "VBG", "VB"], ["NNP", "NNP", "CD", "NN", "NNP"], ["UH", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ"]]
media outlets would fair objective report news would need facebook see others talking. facebook democratization news sense find stories opinions corporate media afraid intimidated plain arrogantly refusing cover. bernie sanders one example nyt. please wake right thing become irrelevant
["social", "medium"]
social medium
1
0
Joe
If media outlets would be fair and objective and report the news, there would be no need to to Facebook and see what others are talking about. Facebook is a democratization of the news in the sense that you can find stories and opinions that the corporate media are too afraid or intimidated or just plain arrogantly refusing to cover. Bernie Sanders is just one example NYT. Please wake up and do the right thing before you become irrelevant.
newspapers
A1738-P
facebook
0
3
4,435
18,552,535
[["media", "outlets", "would", "fair", "objective", "report", "news", "would", "need", "facebook", "see", "others", "talking"], ["facebook", "democratization", "news", "sense", "find", "stories", "opinions", "corporate", "media", "afraid", "intimidated", "plain", "arrogantly", "refusing", "cover"], ["bernie", "sanders", "one", "example", "nyt"], ["please", "wake", "right", "thing", "become", "irrelevant"]]
[["NNS", "NNS", "MD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNP", "VB", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "RB", "VBG", "VB"], ["NNP", "NNP", "CD", "NN", "NNP"], ["UH", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ"]]
media outlets would fair objective report news would need facebook see others talking. facebook democratization news sense find stories opinions corporate media afraid intimidated plain arrogantly refusing cover. bernie sanders one example nyt. please wake right thing become irrelevant
["facebook"]
facebook
1
1
Joe
If media outlets would be fair and objective and report the news, there would be no need to to Facebook and see what others are talking about. Facebook is a democratization of the news in the sense that you can find stories and opinions that the corporate media are too afraid or intimidated or just plain arrogantly refusing to cover. Bernie Sanders is just one example NYT. Please wake up and do the right thing before you become irrelevant.
newspapers
A1738-P
media outlets
1
3
4,436
18,552,535
[["media", "outlets", "would", "fair", "objective", "report", "news", "would", "need", "facebook", "see", "others", "talking"], ["facebook", "democratization", "news", "sense", "find", "stories", "opinions", "corporate", "media", "afraid", "intimidated", "plain", "arrogantly", "refusing", "cover"], ["bernie", "sanders", "one", "example", "nyt"], ["please", "wake", "right", "thing", "become", "irrelevant"]]
[["NNS", "NNS", "MD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNP", "VB", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "RB", "VBG", "VB"], ["NNP", "NNP", "CD", "NN", "NNP"], ["UH", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ"]]
media outlets would fair objective report news would need facebook see others talking. facebook democratization news sense find stories opinions corporate media afraid intimidated plain arrogantly refusing cover. bernie sanders one example nyt. please wake right thing become irrelevant
["medium", "outlet"]
medium outlet
1
0
Joe
If media outlets would be fair and objective and report the news, there would be no need to to Facebook and see what others are talking about. Facebook is a democratization of the news in the sense that you can find stories and opinions that the corporate media are too afraid or intimidated or just plain arrogantly refusing to cover. Bernie Sanders is just one example NYT. Please wake up and do the right thing before you become irrelevant.
news
A1737-P
news
1
1
11,320
18,552,535
[["media", "outlets", "would", "fair", "objective", "report", "news", "would", "need", "facebook", "see", "others", "talking"], ["facebook", "democratization", "news", "sense", "find", "stories", "opinions", "corporate", "media", "afraid", "intimidated", "plain", "arrogantly", "refusing", "cover"], ["bernie", "sanders", "one", "example", "nyt"], ["please", "wake", "right", "thing", "become", "irrelevant"]]
[["NNS", "NNS", "MD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNP", "VB", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "RB", "VBG", "VB"], ["NNP", "NNP", "CD", "NN", "NNP"], ["UH", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ"]]
media outlets would fair objective report news would need facebook see others talking. facebook democratization news sense find stories opinions corporate media afraid intimidated plain arrogantly refusing cover. bernie sanders one example nyt. please wake right thing become irrelevant
["news"]
news
1
1
Joe
If media outlets would be fair and objective and report the news, there would be no need to to Facebook and see what others are talking about. Facebook is a democratization of the news in the sense that you can find stories and opinions that the corporate media are too afraid or intimidated or just plain arrogantly refusing to cover. Bernie Sanders is just one example NYT. Please wake up and do the right thing before you become irrelevant.
news
A1737-P
medium
1
3
11,321
18,552,535
[["media", "outlets", "would", "fair", "objective", "report", "news", "would", "need", "facebook", "see", "others", "talking"], ["facebook", "democratization", "news", "sense", "find", "stories", "opinions", "corporate", "media", "afraid", "intimidated", "plain", "arrogantly", "refusing", "cover"], ["bernie", "sanders", "one", "example", "nyt"], ["please", "wake", "right", "thing", "become", "irrelevant"]]
[["NNS", "NNS", "MD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNP", "VB", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "RB", "VBG", "VB"], ["NNP", "NNP", "CD", "NN", "NNP"], ["UH", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ"]]
media outlets would fair objective report news would need facebook see others talking. facebook democratization news sense find stories opinions corporate media afraid intimidated plain arrogantly refusing cover. bernie sanders one example nyt. please wake right thing become irrelevant
["medium"]
medium
1
0
Joe
If media outlets would be fair and objective and report the news, there would be no need to to Facebook and see what others are talking about. Facebook is a democratization of the news in the sense that you can find stories and opinions that the corporate media are too afraid or intimidated or just plain arrogantly refusing to cover. Bernie Sanders is just one example NYT. Please wake up and do the right thing before you become irrelevant.
news
A1737-P
mainstream media
0
2
11,322
18,552,535
[["media", "outlets", "would", "fair", "objective", "report", "news", "would", "need", "facebook", "see", "others", "talking"], ["facebook", "democratization", "news", "sense", "find", "stories", "opinions", "corporate", "media", "afraid", "intimidated", "plain", "arrogantly", "refusing", "cover"], ["bernie", "sanders", "one", "example", "nyt"], ["please", "wake", "right", "thing", "become", "irrelevant"]]
[["NNS", "NNS", "MD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNP", "VB", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "RB", "VBG", "VB"], ["NNP", "NNP", "CD", "NN", "NNP"], ["UH", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ"]]
media outlets would fair objective report news would need facebook see others talking. facebook democratization news sense find stories opinions corporate media afraid intimidated plain arrogantly refusing cover. bernie sanders one example nyt. please wake right thing become irrelevant
["mainstream", "medium"]
mainstream medium
1
0
Joe
If media outlets would be fair and objective and report the news, there would be no need to to Facebook and see what others are talking about. Facebook is a democratization of the news in the sense that you can find stories and opinions that the corporate media are too afraid or intimidated or just plain arrogantly refusing to cover. Bernie Sanders is just one example NYT. Please wake up and do the right thing before you become irrelevant.
news
A1737-P
media outlets
0
3
11,323
18,552,535
[["media", "outlets", "would", "fair", "objective", "report", "news", "would", "need", "facebook", "see", "others", "talking"], ["facebook", "democratization", "news", "sense", "find", "stories", "opinions", "corporate", "media", "afraid", "intimidated", "plain", "arrogantly", "refusing", "cover"], ["bernie", "sanders", "one", "example", "nyt"], ["please", "wake", "right", "thing", "become", "irrelevant"]]
[["NNS", "NNS", "MD", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNP", "VB", "NNS", "VBG"], ["NNP", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "NNS", "JJ", "NNS", "JJ", "VBN", "JJ", "RB", "VBG", "VB"], ["NNP", "NNP", "CD", "NN", "NNP"], ["UH", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VBP", "JJ"]]
media outlets would fair objective report news would need facebook see others talking. facebook democratization news sense find stories opinions corporate media afraid intimidated plain arrogantly refusing cover. bernie sanders one example nyt. please wake right thing become irrelevant
["medium", "outlet"]
medium outlet
1
0
Betsy
This looks like a half solution. We need to start by acknowledging that students who want to learn need an environment where they can. Charter schools can do a good job of this. But the other half of the problem - what happens to the disruptive students also needs to be addressed adequately. Dumping the troubled students is not a solution for the dumpees. The reasons for disruptive behavior are wildly varied. We need to be willing to take the next step and work with them too, on their level(s) to bring them along. And yes, they probably will be more costly to educate than charter school students, as they are undoubtedly needier.
cherry-picking students
A4368-P
cherry-picking students
0
1
9,537
13,563,613
[["looks", "like", "half", "solution"], ["need", "start", "acknowledging", "students", "want", "learn", "need", "environment"], ["charter", "schools", "good", "job"], ["half", "problem", "happens", "disruptive", "students", "also", "needs", "addressed", "adequately"], ["dumping", "troubled", "students", "solution", "dumpees"], ["reasons", "disruptive", "behavior", "wildly", "varied"], ["need", "willing", "take", "next", "step", "work", "level(s", "bring", "along"], ["yes", "probably", "costly", "educate", "charter", "school", "students", "undoubtedly", "needier"]]
[["VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBP", "VB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBZ", "VBN", "RB"], ["VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["VBP", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["UH", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJR"]]
looks like half solution. need start acknowledging students want learn need environment. charter schools good job. half problem happens disruptive students also needs addressed adequately. dumping troubled students solution dumpees. reasons disruptive behavior wildly varied. need willing take next step work level(s bring along. yes probably costly educate charter school students undoubtedly needier
["cherrypicking", "student"]
cherrypicking student
1
0
Betsy
This looks like a half solution. We need to start by acknowledging that students who want to learn need an environment where they can. Charter schools can do a good job of this. But the other half of the problem - what happens to the disruptive students also needs to be addressed adequately. Dumping the troubled students is not a solution for the dumpees. The reasons for disruptive behavior are wildly varied. We need to be willing to take the next step and work with them too, on their level(s) to bring them along. And yes, they probably will be more costly to educate than charter school students, as they are undoubtedly needier.
cherry-picking students
A4368-P
school
0
3
9,538
13,563,613
[["looks", "like", "half", "solution"], ["need", "start", "acknowledging", "students", "want", "learn", "need", "environment"], ["charter", "schools", "good", "job"], ["half", "problem", "happens", "disruptive", "students", "also", "needs", "addressed", "adequately"], ["dumping", "troubled", "students", "solution", "dumpees"], ["reasons", "disruptive", "behavior", "wildly", "varied"], ["need", "willing", "take", "next", "step", "work", "level(s", "bring", "along"], ["yes", "probably", "costly", "educate", "charter", "school", "students", "undoubtedly", "needier"]]
[["VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBP", "VB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBZ", "VBN", "RB"], ["VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["VBP", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["UH", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJR"]]
looks like half solution. need start acknowledging students want learn need environment. charter schools good job. half problem happens disruptive students also needs addressed adequately. dumping troubled students solution dumpees. reasons disruptive behavior wildly varied. need willing take next step work level(s bring along. yes probably costly educate charter school students undoubtedly needier
["school"]
school
1
1
Betsy
This looks like a half solution. We need to start by acknowledging that students who want to learn need an environment where they can. Charter schools can do a good job of this. But the other half of the problem - what happens to the disruptive students also needs to be addressed adequately. Dumping the troubled students is not a solution for the dumpees. The reasons for disruptive behavior are wildly varied. We need to be willing to take the next step and work with them too, on their level(s) to bring them along. And yes, they probably will be more costly to educate than charter school students, as they are undoubtedly needier.
cherry-picking students
A4368-P
troubled students
0
3
9,539
13,563,613
[["looks", "like", "half", "solution"], ["need", "start", "acknowledging", "students", "want", "learn", "need", "environment"], ["charter", "schools", "good", "job"], ["half", "problem", "happens", "disruptive", "students", "also", "needs", "addressed", "adequately"], ["dumping", "troubled", "students", "solution", "dumpees"], ["reasons", "disruptive", "behavior", "wildly", "varied"], ["need", "willing", "take", "next", "step", "work", "level(s", "bring", "along"], ["yes", "probably", "costly", "educate", "charter", "school", "students", "undoubtedly", "needier"]]
[["VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBP", "VB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBZ", "VBN", "RB"], ["VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["VBP", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["UH", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJR"]]
looks like half solution. need start acknowledging students want learn need environment. charter schools good job. half problem happens disruptive students also needs addressed adequately. dumping troubled students solution dumpees. reasons disruptive behavior wildly varied. need willing take next step work level(s bring along. yes probably costly educate charter school students undoubtedly needier
["troubled", "student"]
troubled student
1
1
Betsy
This looks like a half solution. We need to start by acknowledging that students who want to learn need an environment where they can. Charter schools can do a good job of this. But the other half of the problem - what happens to the disruptive students also needs to be addressed adequately. Dumping the troubled students is not a solution for the dumpees. The reasons for disruptive behavior are wildly varied. We need to be willing to take the next step and work with them too, on their level(s) to bring them along. And yes, they probably will be more costly to educate than charter school students, as they are undoubtedly needier.
cherry-picking students
A4368-P
education
0
3
9,540
13,563,613
[["looks", "like", "half", "solution"], ["need", "start", "acknowledging", "students", "want", "learn", "need", "environment"], ["charter", "schools", "good", "job"], ["half", "problem", "happens", "disruptive", "students", "also", "needs", "addressed", "adequately"], ["dumping", "troubled", "students", "solution", "dumpees"], ["reasons", "disruptive", "behavior", "wildly", "varied"], ["need", "willing", "take", "next", "step", "work", "level(s", "bring", "along"], ["yes", "probably", "costly", "educate", "charter", "school", "students", "undoubtedly", "needier"]]
[["VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBP", "VB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBZ", "VBN", "RB"], ["VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["VBP", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["UH", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJR"]]
looks like half solution. need start acknowledging students want learn need environment. charter schools good job. half problem happens disruptive students also needs addressed adequately. dumping troubled students solution dumpees. reasons disruptive behavior wildly varied. need willing take next step work level(s bring along. yes probably costly educate charter school students undoubtedly needier
["education"]
education
1
0
Betsy
This looks like a half solution. We need to start by acknowledging that students who want to learn need an environment where they can. Charter schools can do a good job of this. But the other half of the problem - what happens to the disruptive students also needs to be addressed adequately. Dumping the troubled students is not a solution for the dumpees. The reasons for disruptive behavior are wildly varied. We need to be willing to take the next step and work with them too, on their level(s) to bring them along. And yes, they probably will be more costly to educate than charter school students, as they are undoubtedly needier.
charter schools
A4367-P
charter schools
1
1
16,425
13,563,613
[["looks", "like", "half", "solution"], ["need", "start", "acknowledging", "students", "want", "learn", "need", "environment"], ["charter", "schools", "good", "job"], ["half", "problem", "happens", "disruptive", "students", "also", "needs", "addressed", "adequately"], ["dumping", "troubled", "students", "solution", "dumpees"], ["reasons", "disruptive", "behavior", "wildly", "varied"], ["need", "willing", "take", "next", "step", "work", "level(s", "bring", "along"], ["yes", "probably", "costly", "educate", "charter", "school", "students", "undoubtedly", "needier"]]
[["VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBP", "VB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBZ", "VBN", "RB"], ["VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["VBP", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["UH", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJR"]]
looks like half solution. need start acknowledging students want learn need environment. charter schools good job. half problem happens disruptive students also needs addressed adequately. dumping troubled students solution dumpees. reasons disruptive behavior wildly varied. need willing take next step work level(s bring along. yes probably costly educate charter school students undoubtedly needier
["charter", "school"]
charter school
1
1
Betsy
This looks like a half solution. We need to start by acknowledging that students who want to learn need an environment where they can. Charter schools can do a good job of this. But the other half of the problem - what happens to the disruptive students also needs to be addressed adequately. Dumping the troubled students is not a solution for the dumpees. The reasons for disruptive behavior are wildly varied. We need to be willing to take the next step and work with them too, on their level(s) to bring them along. And yes, they probably will be more costly to educate than charter school students, as they are undoubtedly needier.
charter schools
A4367-P
charter schools
1
3
16,426
13,563,613
[["looks", "like", "half", "solution"], ["need", "start", "acknowledging", "students", "want", "learn", "need", "environment"], ["charter", "schools", "good", "job"], ["half", "problem", "happens", "disruptive", "students", "also", "needs", "addressed", "adequately"], ["dumping", "troubled", "students", "solution", "dumpees"], ["reasons", "disruptive", "behavior", "wildly", "varied"], ["need", "willing", "take", "next", "step", "work", "level(s", "bring", "along"], ["yes", "probably", "costly", "educate", "charter", "school", "students", "undoubtedly", "needier"]]
[["VBZ", "IN", "NN", "NN"], ["VBP", "VB", "VBG", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN"], ["NN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBZ", "VBN", "RB"], ["VBG", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "JJ"], ["VBP", "JJ", "VB", "JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "RB"], ["UH", "RB", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "JJR"]]
looks like half solution. need start acknowledging students want learn need environment. charter schools good job. half problem happens disruptive students also needs addressed adequately. dumping troubled students solution dumpees. reasons disruptive behavior wildly varied. need willing take next step work level(s bring along. yes probably costly educate charter school students undoubtedly needier
["charter", "school"]
charter school
1
1
Larry
Legal or illegal, prostitution will continue. This is evident around the world. Sex is a basic inherent need and prostitution will not go away regardless of the criminal penalties. The only rational approach is to bring it above ground, gain transparency, and enforce safety regulations. These things happen only with legalized prostitution. New Zealand is today a great example of legalized prostitution where workers are well-treated and safe.
prostituion
A1042-P
prostituion
1
1
17,154
6,051,555
[["legal", "illegal", "prostitution", "continue"], ["evident", "around", "world"], ["sex", "basic", "inherent", "need", "prostitution", "go", "away", "regardless", "criminal", "penalties"], ["rational", "approach", "bring", "ground", "gain", "transparency", "enforce", "safety", "regulations"], ["things", "happen", "legalized", "prostitution"], ["new", "zealand", "today", "great", "example", "legalized", "prostitution", "workers", "well", "treated", "safe"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VB"], ["JJ", "IN", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBN", "JJ"]]
legal illegal prostitution continue. evident around world. sex basic inherent need prostitution go away regardless criminal penalties. rational approach bring ground gain transparency enforce safety regulations. things happen legalized prostitution. new zealand today great example legalized prostitution workers well treated safe
["prostitution"]
prostitution
1
1
Larry
Legal or illegal, prostitution will continue. This is evident around the world. Sex is a basic inherent need and prostitution will not go away regardless of the criminal penalties. The only rational approach is to bring it above ground, gain transparency, and enforce safety regulations. These things happen only with legalized prostitution. New Zealand is today a great example of legalized prostitution where workers are well-treated and safe.
prostituion
A1042-P
legalized prostitution
1
3
17,155
6,051,555
[["legal", "illegal", "prostitution", "continue"], ["evident", "around", "world"], ["sex", "basic", "inherent", "need", "prostitution", "go", "away", "regardless", "criminal", "penalties"], ["rational", "approach", "bring", "ground", "gain", "transparency", "enforce", "safety", "regulations"], ["things", "happen", "legalized", "prostitution"], ["new", "zealand", "today", "great", "example", "legalized", "prostitution", "workers", "well", "treated", "safe"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VB"], ["JJ", "IN", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBN", "JJ"]]
legal illegal prostitution continue. evident around world. sex basic inherent need prostitution go away regardless criminal penalties. rational approach bring ground gain transparency enforce safety regulations. things happen legalized prostitution. new zealand today great example legalized prostitution workers well treated safe
["legalized", "prostitution"]
legalized prostitution
1
1
Larry
Legal or illegal, prostitution will continue. This is evident around the world. Sex is a basic inherent need and prostitution will not go away regardless of the criminal penalties. The only rational approach is to bring it above ground, gain transparency, and enforce safety regulations. These things happen only with legalized prostitution. New Zealand is today a great example of legalized prostitution where workers are well-treated and safe.
prostituion
A1042-P
prostitution
1
3
17,156
6,051,555
[["legal", "illegal", "prostitution", "continue"], ["evident", "around", "world"], ["sex", "basic", "inherent", "need", "prostitution", "go", "away", "regardless", "criminal", "penalties"], ["rational", "approach", "bring", "ground", "gain", "transparency", "enforce", "safety", "regulations"], ["things", "happen", "legalized", "prostitution"], ["new", "zealand", "today", "great", "example", "legalized", "prostitution", "workers", "well", "treated", "safe"]]
[["JJ", "JJ", "NN", "VB"], ["JJ", "IN", "NN"], ["NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "VB", "RB", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NN", "NNS"], ["NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBN", "JJ"]]
legal illegal prostitution continue. evident around world. sex basic inherent need prostitution go away regardless criminal penalties. rational approach bring ground gain transparency enforce safety regulations. things happen legalized prostitution. new zealand today great example legalized prostitution workers well treated safe
["prostitution"]
prostitution
1
1
Jon Jensen
I could live with a flat 15% Federal tax on all income,with few deductions.Maybe add a flat 3% for state and be done with it.How can individuals and corporations plan for the long term,when politicians are constantly changing the tax code?I keep reading that 70% of the economy is consumer spending.We need more incentives for Americans to save and invest and spend less.Maybe more consumption taxes,like Europe,that are hard to evade and lower taxes on investment make sense.
capital gains
A2247-P
capital gains
0
1
12,612
6,895,334
[["could", "live", "flat", "15", "federal", "tax", "income", "deductions", "maybe", "add", "flat", "3", "state", "done", "individuals", "corporations", "plan", "long", "term", "politicians", "constantly", "changing", "tax", "code?i", "keep", "reading", "70", "economy", "consumer", "spending", "need", "incentives", "americans", "save", "invest", "spend", "less", "maybe", "consumption", "taxes", "like", "europe", "hard", "evade", "lower", "taxes", "investment", "make", "sense"]]
[["MD", "VB", "JJ", "CD", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "CD", "NN", "VBN", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NNS", "NNPS", "VB", "VB", "VB", "JJR", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "JJ", "VB", "JJR", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN"]]
could live flat 15 federal tax income deductions maybe add flat 3 state done individuals corporations plan long term politicians constantly changing tax code?i keep reading 70 economy consumer spending need incentives americans save invest spend less maybe consumption taxes like europe hard evade lower taxes investment make sense
["capital", "gain"]
capital gain
1
0
Jon Jensen
I could live with a flat 15% Federal tax on all income,with few deductions.Maybe add a flat 3% for state and be done with it.How can individuals and corporations plan for the long term,when politicians are constantly changing the tax code?I keep reading that 70% of the economy is consumer spending.We need more incentives for Americans to save and invest and spend less.Maybe more consumption taxes,like Europe,that are hard to evade and lower taxes on investment make sense.
capital gains
A2247-P
tax
0
3
12,613
6,895,334
[["could", "live", "flat", "15", "federal", "tax", "income", "deductions", "maybe", "add", "flat", "3", "state", "done", "individuals", "corporations", "plan", "long", "term", "politicians", "constantly", "changing", "tax", "code?i", "keep", "reading", "70", "economy", "consumer", "spending", "need", "incentives", "americans", "save", "invest", "spend", "less", "maybe", "consumption", "taxes", "like", "europe", "hard", "evade", "lower", "taxes", "investment", "make", "sense"]]
[["MD", "VB", "JJ", "CD", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "CD", "NN", "VBN", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NNS", "NNPS", "VB", "VB", "VB", "JJR", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "JJ", "VB", "JJR", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN"]]
could live flat 15 federal tax income deductions maybe add flat 3 state done individuals corporations plan long term politicians constantly changing tax code?i keep reading 70 economy consumer spending need incentives americans save invest spend less maybe consumption taxes like europe hard evade lower taxes investment make sense
["tax"]
tax
1
1
Jon Jensen
I could live with a flat 15% Federal tax on all income,with few deductions.Maybe add a flat 3% for state and be done with it.How can individuals and corporations plan for the long term,when politicians are constantly changing the tax code?I keep reading that 70% of the economy is consumer spending.We need more incentives for Americans to save and invest and spend less.Maybe more consumption taxes,like Europe,that are hard to evade and lower taxes on investment make sense.
capital gains
A2247-P
income tax
1
3
12,614
6,895,334
[["could", "live", "flat", "15", "federal", "tax", "income", "deductions", "maybe", "add", "flat", "3", "state", "done", "individuals", "corporations", "plan", "long", "term", "politicians", "constantly", "changing", "tax", "code?i", "keep", "reading", "70", "economy", "consumer", "spending", "need", "incentives", "americans", "save", "invest", "spend", "less", "maybe", "consumption", "taxes", "like", "europe", "hard", "evade", "lower", "taxes", "investment", "make", "sense"]]
[["MD", "VB", "JJ", "CD", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "CD", "NN", "VBN", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NNS", "NNPS", "VB", "VB", "VB", "JJR", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "JJ", "VB", "JJR", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN"]]
could live flat 15 federal tax income deductions maybe add flat 3 state done individuals corporations plan long term politicians constantly changing tax code?i keep reading 70 economy consumer spending need incentives americans save invest spend less maybe consumption taxes like europe hard evade lower taxes investment make sense
["income", "tax"]
income tax
1
0
Jon Jensen
I could live with a flat 15% Federal tax on all income,with few deductions.Maybe add a flat 3% for state and be done with it.How can individuals and corporations plan for the long term,when politicians are constantly changing the tax code?I keep reading that 70% of the economy is consumer spending.We need more incentives for Americans to save and invest and spend less.Maybe more consumption taxes,like Europe,that are hard to evade and lower taxes on investment make sense.
capital gains
A2247-P
income tax
0
2
12,615
6,895,334
[["could", "live", "flat", "15", "federal", "tax", "income", "deductions", "maybe", "add", "flat", "3", "state", "done", "individuals", "corporations", "plan", "long", "term", "politicians", "constantly", "changing", "tax", "code?i", "keep", "reading", "70", "economy", "consumer", "spending", "need", "incentives", "americans", "save", "invest", "spend", "less", "maybe", "consumption", "taxes", "like", "europe", "hard", "evade", "lower", "taxes", "investment", "make", "sense"]]
[["MD", "VB", "JJ", "CD", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "CD", "NN", "VBN", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NNS", "NNPS", "VB", "VB", "VB", "JJR", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "JJ", "VB", "JJR", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN"]]
could live flat 15 federal tax income deductions maybe add flat 3 state done individuals corporations plan long term politicians constantly changing tax code?i keep reading 70 economy consumer spending need incentives americans save invest spend less maybe consumption taxes like europe hard evade lower taxes investment make sense
["income", "tax"]
income tax
1
0
Jon Jensen
I could live with a flat 15% Federal tax on all income,with few deductions.Maybe add a flat 3% for state and be done with it.How can individuals and corporations plan for the long term,when politicians are constantly changing the tax code?I keep reading that 70% of the economy is consumer spending.We need more incentives for Americans to save and invest and spend less.Maybe more consumption taxes,like Europe,that are hard to evade and lower taxes on investment make sense.
capital gains
A2247-P
economic incentives
0
3
12,616
6,895,334
[["could", "live", "flat", "15", "federal", "tax", "income", "deductions", "maybe", "add", "flat", "3", "state", "done", "individuals", "corporations", "plan", "long", "term", "politicians", "constantly", "changing", "tax", "code?i", "keep", "reading", "70", "economy", "consumer", "spending", "need", "incentives", "americans", "save", "invest", "spend", "less", "maybe", "consumption", "taxes", "like", "europe", "hard", "evade", "lower", "taxes", "investment", "make", "sense"]]
[["MD", "VB", "JJ", "CD", "NNP", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "CD", "NN", "VBN", "NNS", "NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "VBG", "CD", "NN", "NN", "NN", "VBP", "NNS", "NNPS", "VB", "VB", "VB", "JJR", "RB", "NN", "NNS", "IN", "NNP", "JJ", "VB", "JJR", "NNS", "NN", "VBP", "NN"]]
could live flat 15 federal tax income deductions maybe add flat 3 state done individuals corporations plan long term politicians constantly changing tax code?i keep reading 70 economy consumer spending need incentives americans save invest spend less maybe consumption taxes like europe hard evade lower taxes investment make sense
["economic", "incentive"]
economic incentive
1
0
sdavidc9
As long as jobs are scarce, it makes sense that people who have not been convicted should have a better shot at them. This means that the burden of the scarcity of jobs should fall more heavily on the convicted, even though this makes it more difficult for them to go straight and have successful lives. On the other hand, those with criminal records and experience are more likely to return to crime if they cant find legal sources of income like jobs, and those with no criminal experience are less likely. From this point of view, it makes sense to give the oil to the squeaky hinges, thereby rewarding lawbreaking and penalizing those who have not gotten caught breaking the law. This is our present policy, which we wind up with because it is supposedly cheaper in the short run. People unlikely to make trouble because they cannot find jobs are left to their own devices.
an employer 's first impression
A1162-P
an employer 's first impression
0
1
5,578
18,200,299
[["long", "jobs", "scarce", "makes", "sense", "people", "convicted", "better", "shot"], ["means", "burden", "scarcity", "jobs", "fall", "heavily", "convicted", "even", "though", "makes", "difficult", "go", "straight", "successful", "lives"], ["hand", "criminal", "records", "experience", "likely", "return", "crime", "ca", "nt", "find", "legal", "sources", "income", "like", "jobs", "criminal", "experience", "less", "likely"], ["point", "view", "makes", "sense", "give", "oil", "squeaky", "hinges", "thereby", "rewarding", "lawbreaking", "penalizing", "gotten", "caught", "breaking", "law"], ["present", "policy", "wind", "supposedly", "cheaper", "short", "run"], ["people", "unlikely", "make", "trouble", "find", "jobs", "left", "devices"]]
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJR", "NN"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VBN", "RB", "IN", "VBZ", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "IN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RBR", "JJ"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "VBN", "VBN", "VBG", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBP", "RB", "JJR", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "VBN", "NNS"]]
long jobs scarce makes sense people convicted better shot. means burden scarcity jobs fall heavily convicted even though makes difficult go straight successful lives. hand criminal records experience likely return crime ca nt find legal sources income like jobs criminal experience less likely. point view makes sense give oil squeaky hinges thereby rewarding lawbreaking penalizing gotten caught breaking law. present policy wind supposedly cheaper short run. people unlikely make trouble find jobs left devices
["employer", "'s", "first", "impression"]
employer 's first impression
1
0
sdavidc9
As long as jobs are scarce, it makes sense that people who have not been convicted should have a better shot at them. This means that the burden of the scarcity of jobs should fall more heavily on the convicted, even though this makes it more difficult for them to go straight and have successful lives. On the other hand, those with criminal records and experience are more likely to return to crime if they cant find legal sources of income like jobs, and those with no criminal experience are less likely. From this point of view, it makes sense to give the oil to the squeaky hinges, thereby rewarding lawbreaking and penalizing those who have not gotten caught breaking the law. This is our present policy, which we wind up with because it is supposedly cheaper in the short run. People unlikely to make trouble because they cannot find jobs are left to their own devices.
an employer 's first impression
A1162-P
job scarcity
0
3
5,579
18,200,299
[["long", "jobs", "scarce", "makes", "sense", "people", "convicted", "better", "shot"], ["means", "burden", "scarcity", "jobs", "fall", "heavily", "convicted", "even", "though", "makes", "difficult", "go", "straight", "successful", "lives"], ["hand", "criminal", "records", "experience", "likely", "return", "crime", "ca", "nt", "find", "legal", "sources", "income", "like", "jobs", "criminal", "experience", "less", "likely"], ["point", "view", "makes", "sense", "give", "oil", "squeaky", "hinges", "thereby", "rewarding", "lawbreaking", "penalizing", "gotten", "caught", "breaking", "law"], ["present", "policy", "wind", "supposedly", "cheaper", "short", "run"], ["people", "unlikely", "make", "trouble", "find", "jobs", "left", "devices"]]
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJR", "NN"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VBN", "RB", "IN", "VBZ", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "IN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RBR", "JJ"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "VBN", "VBN", "VBG", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBP", "RB", "JJR", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "VBN", "NNS"]]
long jobs scarce makes sense people convicted better shot. means burden scarcity jobs fall heavily convicted even though makes difficult go straight successful lives. hand criminal records experience likely return crime ca nt find legal sources income like jobs criminal experience less likely. point view makes sense give oil squeaky hinges thereby rewarding lawbreaking penalizing gotten caught breaking law. present policy wind supposedly cheaper short run. people unlikely make trouble find jobs left devices
["job", "scarcity"]
job scarcity
1
0
sdavidc9
As long as jobs are scarce, it makes sense that people who have not been convicted should have a better shot at them. This means that the burden of the scarcity of jobs should fall more heavily on the convicted, even though this makes it more difficult for them to go straight and have successful lives. On the other hand, those with criminal records and experience are more likely to return to crime if they cant find legal sources of income like jobs, and those with no criminal experience are less likely. From this point of view, it makes sense to give the oil to the squeaky hinges, thereby rewarding lawbreaking and penalizing those who have not gotten caught breaking the law. This is our present policy, which we wind up with because it is supposedly cheaper in the short run. People unlikely to make trouble because they cannot find jobs are left to their own devices.
an employer 's first impression
A1162-P
breaking the law
1
3
5,580
18,200,299
[["long", "jobs", "scarce", "makes", "sense", "people", "convicted", "better", "shot"], ["means", "burden", "scarcity", "jobs", "fall", "heavily", "convicted", "even", "though", "makes", "difficult", "go", "straight", "successful", "lives"], ["hand", "criminal", "records", "experience", "likely", "return", "crime", "ca", "nt", "find", "legal", "sources", "income", "like", "jobs", "criminal", "experience", "less", "likely"], ["point", "view", "makes", "sense", "give", "oil", "squeaky", "hinges", "thereby", "rewarding", "lawbreaking", "penalizing", "gotten", "caught", "breaking", "law"], ["present", "policy", "wind", "supposedly", "cheaper", "short", "run"], ["people", "unlikely", "make", "trouble", "find", "jobs", "left", "devices"]]
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJR", "NN"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VBN", "RB", "IN", "VBZ", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "IN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RBR", "JJ"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "VBN", "VBN", "VBG", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBP", "RB", "JJR", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "VBN", "NNS"]]
long jobs scarce makes sense people convicted better shot. means burden scarcity jobs fall heavily convicted even though makes difficult go straight successful lives. hand criminal records experience likely return crime ca nt find legal sources income like jobs criminal experience less likely. point view makes sense give oil squeaky hinges thereby rewarding lawbreaking penalizing gotten caught breaking law. present policy wind supposedly cheaper short run. people unlikely make trouble find jobs left devices
["breaking", "law"]
breaking law
1
1
sdavidc9
As long as jobs are scarce, it makes sense that people who have not been convicted should have a better shot at them. This means that the burden of the scarcity of jobs should fall more heavily on the convicted, even though this makes it more difficult for them to go straight and have successful lives. On the other hand, those with criminal records and experience are more likely to return to crime if they cant find legal sources of income like jobs, and those with no criminal experience are less likely. From this point of view, it makes sense to give the oil to the squeaky hinges, thereby rewarding lawbreaking and penalizing those who have not gotten caught breaking the law. This is our present policy, which we wind up with because it is supposedly cheaper in the short run. People unlikely to make trouble because they cannot find jobs are left to their own devices.
jail record
A1161-P
jail record
0
1
5,708
18,200,299
[["long", "jobs", "scarce", "makes", "sense", "people", "convicted", "better", "shot"], ["means", "burden", "scarcity", "jobs", "fall", "heavily", "convicted", "even", "though", "makes", "difficult", "go", "straight", "successful", "lives"], ["hand", "criminal", "records", "experience", "likely", "return", "crime", "ca", "nt", "find", "legal", "sources", "income", "like", "jobs", "criminal", "experience", "less", "likely"], ["point", "view", "makes", "sense", "give", "oil", "squeaky", "hinges", "thereby", "rewarding", "lawbreaking", "penalizing", "gotten", "caught", "breaking", "law"], ["present", "policy", "wind", "supposedly", "cheaper", "short", "run"], ["people", "unlikely", "make", "trouble", "find", "jobs", "left", "devices"]]
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJR", "NN"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VBN", "RB", "IN", "VBZ", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "IN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RBR", "JJ"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "VBN", "VBN", "VBG", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBP", "RB", "JJR", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "VBN", "NNS"]]
long jobs scarce makes sense people convicted better shot. means burden scarcity jobs fall heavily convicted even though makes difficult go straight successful lives. hand criminal records experience likely return crime ca nt find legal sources income like jobs criminal experience less likely. point view makes sense give oil squeaky hinges thereby rewarding lawbreaking penalizing gotten caught breaking law. present policy wind supposedly cheaper short run. people unlikely make trouble find jobs left devices
["jail", "record"]
jail record
1
0
sdavidc9
As long as jobs are scarce, it makes sense that people who have not been convicted should have a better shot at them. This means that the burden of the scarcity of jobs should fall more heavily on the convicted, even though this makes it more difficult for them to go straight and have successful lives. On the other hand, those with criminal records and experience are more likely to return to crime if they cant find legal sources of income like jobs, and those with no criminal experience are less likely. From this point of view, it makes sense to give the oil to the squeaky hinges, thereby rewarding lawbreaking and penalizing those who have not gotten caught breaking the law. This is our present policy, which we wind up with because it is supposedly cheaper in the short run. People unlikely to make trouble because they cannot find jobs are left to their own devices.
jail record
A1161-P
scarcity of jobs
0
3
5,709
18,200,299
[["long", "jobs", "scarce", "makes", "sense", "people", "convicted", "better", "shot"], ["means", "burden", "scarcity", "jobs", "fall", "heavily", "convicted", "even", "though", "makes", "difficult", "go", "straight", "successful", "lives"], ["hand", "criminal", "records", "experience", "likely", "return", "crime", "ca", "nt", "find", "legal", "sources", "income", "like", "jobs", "criminal", "experience", "less", "likely"], ["point", "view", "makes", "sense", "give", "oil", "squeaky", "hinges", "thereby", "rewarding", "lawbreaking", "penalizing", "gotten", "caught", "breaking", "law"], ["present", "policy", "wind", "supposedly", "cheaper", "short", "run"], ["people", "unlikely", "make", "trouble", "find", "jobs", "left", "devices"]]
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJR", "NN"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VBN", "RB", "IN", "VBZ", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "IN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RBR", "JJ"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "VBN", "VBN", "VBG", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBP", "RB", "JJR", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "VBN", "NNS"]]
long jobs scarce makes sense people convicted better shot. means burden scarcity jobs fall heavily convicted even though makes difficult go straight successful lives. hand criminal records experience likely return crime ca nt find legal sources income like jobs criminal experience less likely. point view makes sense give oil squeaky hinges thereby rewarding lawbreaking penalizing gotten caught breaking law. present policy wind supposedly cheaper short run. people unlikely make trouble find jobs left devices
["scarcity", "job"]
scarcity job
1
1
sdavidc9
As long as jobs are scarce, it makes sense that people who have not been convicted should have a better shot at them. This means that the burden of the scarcity of jobs should fall more heavily on the convicted, even though this makes it more difficult for them to go straight and have successful lives. On the other hand, those with criminal records and experience are more likely to return to crime if they cant find legal sources of income like jobs, and those with no criminal experience are less likely. From this point of view, it makes sense to give the oil to the squeaky hinges, thereby rewarding lawbreaking and penalizing those who have not gotten caught breaking the law. This is our present policy, which we wind up with because it is supposedly cheaper in the short run. People unlikely to make trouble because they cannot find jobs are left to their own devices.
jail record
A1161-P
convicted felons
0
3
5,710
18,200,299
[["long", "jobs", "scarce", "makes", "sense", "people", "convicted", "better", "shot"], ["means", "burden", "scarcity", "jobs", "fall", "heavily", "convicted", "even", "though", "makes", "difficult", "go", "straight", "successful", "lives"], ["hand", "criminal", "records", "experience", "likely", "return", "crime", "ca", "nt", "find", "legal", "sources", "income", "like", "jobs", "criminal", "experience", "less", "likely"], ["point", "view", "makes", "sense", "give", "oil", "squeaky", "hinges", "thereby", "rewarding", "lawbreaking", "penalizing", "gotten", "caught", "breaking", "law"], ["present", "policy", "wind", "supposedly", "cheaper", "short", "run"], ["people", "unlikely", "make", "trouble", "find", "jobs", "left", "devices"]]
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJR", "NN"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VBN", "RB", "IN", "VBZ", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "IN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RBR", "JJ"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "VBN", "VBN", "VBG", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBP", "RB", "JJR", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "VBN", "NNS"]]
long jobs scarce makes sense people convicted better shot. means burden scarcity jobs fall heavily convicted even though makes difficult go straight successful lives. hand criminal records experience likely return crime ca nt find legal sources income like jobs criminal experience less likely. point view makes sense give oil squeaky hinges thereby rewarding lawbreaking penalizing gotten caught breaking law. present policy wind supposedly cheaper short run. people unlikely make trouble find jobs left devices
["convicted", "felon"]
convicted felon
1
0
sdavidc9
As long as jobs are scarce, it makes sense that people who have not been convicted should have a better shot at them. This means that the burden of the scarcity of jobs should fall more heavily on the convicted, even though this makes it more difficult for them to go straight and have successful lives. On the other hand, those with criminal records and experience are more likely to return to crime if they cant find legal sources of income like jobs, and those with no criminal experience are less likely. From this point of view, it makes sense to give the oil to the squeaky hinges, thereby rewarding lawbreaking and penalizing those who have not gotten caught breaking the law. This is our present policy, which we wind up with because it is supposedly cheaper in the short run. People unlikely to make trouble because they cannot find jobs are left to their own devices.
jail record
A1161-P
felon
0
3
5,711
18,200,299
[["long", "jobs", "scarce", "makes", "sense", "people", "convicted", "better", "shot"], ["means", "burden", "scarcity", "jobs", "fall", "heavily", "convicted", "even", "though", "makes", "difficult", "go", "straight", "successful", "lives"], ["hand", "criminal", "records", "experience", "likely", "return", "crime", "ca", "nt", "find", "legal", "sources", "income", "like", "jobs", "criminal", "experience", "less", "likely"], ["point", "view", "makes", "sense", "give", "oil", "squeaky", "hinges", "thereby", "rewarding", "lawbreaking", "penalizing", "gotten", "caught", "breaking", "law"], ["present", "policy", "wind", "supposedly", "cheaper", "short", "run"], ["people", "unlikely", "make", "trouble", "find", "jobs", "left", "devices"]]
[["RB", "NNS", "JJ", "VBZ", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJR", "NN"], ["VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NNS", "VB", "RB", "VBN", "RB", "IN", "VBZ", "JJ", "VB", "RB", "JJ", "NNS"], ["NN", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "MD", "RB", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "IN", "NNS", "JJ", "NN", "RBR", "JJ"], ["NN", "NN", "VBZ", "NN", "VB", "NN", "JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBG", "NN", "VBG", "VBN", "VBN", "VBG", "NN"], ["JJ", "NN", "VBP", "RB", "JJR", "JJ", "NN"], ["NNS", "JJ", "VB", "NN", "VB", "NNS", "VBN", "NNS"]]
long jobs scarce makes sense people convicted better shot. means burden scarcity jobs fall heavily convicted even though makes difficult go straight successful lives. hand criminal records experience likely return crime ca nt find legal sources income like jobs criminal experience less likely. point view makes sense give oil squeaky hinges thereby rewarding lawbreaking penalizing gotten caught breaking law. present policy wind supposedly cheaper short run. people unlikely make trouble find jobs left devices
["felon"]
felon
1
0
Glenn
Anyone who says or even thinks that air travel today is superior in any meaningful way to air travel before regulation has no direct knowledge of regulated air travel. - I do. Air travel today is equivalent to bus travel in the sixties. I remember that as well. There is no such thing as a free market in any industry -- least of all the airline industry.
government
A1876-P
government
0
1
15,076
18,683,641
[["anyone", "says", "even", "thinks", "air", "travel", "today", "superior", "meaningful", "way", "air", "travel", "regulation", "direct", "knowledge", "regulated", "air", "travel"], ["air", "travel", "today", "equivalent", "bus", "travel", "sixties"], ["remember", "well"], ["thing", "free", "market", "industry", "--", "least", "airline", "industry"]]
[["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", ":", "JJS", "NN", "NN"]]
anyone says even thinks air travel today superior meaningful way air travel regulation direct knowledge regulated air travel. air travel today equivalent bus travel sixties. remember well. thing free market industry -- least airline industry
["government"]
government
1
0
Glenn
Anyone who says or even thinks that air travel today is superior in any meaningful way to air travel before regulation has no direct knowledge of regulated air travel. - I do. Air travel today is equivalent to bus travel in the sixties. I remember that as well. There is no such thing as a free market in any industry -- least of all the airline industry.
government
A1876-P
air
0
3
15,077
18,683,641
[["anyone", "says", "even", "thinks", "air", "travel", "today", "superior", "meaningful", "way", "air", "travel", "regulation", "direct", "knowledge", "regulated", "air", "travel"], ["air", "travel", "today", "equivalent", "bus", "travel", "sixties"], ["remember", "well"], ["thing", "free", "market", "industry", "--", "least", "airline", "industry"]]
[["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", ":", "JJS", "NN", "NN"]]
anyone says even thinks air travel today superior meaningful way air travel regulation direct knowledge regulated air travel. air travel today equivalent bus travel sixties. remember well. thing free market industry -- least airline industry
["air"]
air
1
1
Glenn
Anyone who says or even thinks that air travel today is superior in any meaningful way to air travel before regulation has no direct knowledge of regulated air travel. - I do. Air travel today is equivalent to bus travel in the sixties. I remember that as well. There is no such thing as a free market in any industry -- least of all the airline industry.
government
A1876-P
air travel
0
2
15,078
18,683,641
[["anyone", "says", "even", "thinks", "air", "travel", "today", "superior", "meaningful", "way", "air", "travel", "regulation", "direct", "knowledge", "regulated", "air", "travel"], ["air", "travel", "today", "equivalent", "bus", "travel", "sixties"], ["remember", "well"], ["thing", "free", "market", "industry", "--", "least", "airline", "industry"]]
[["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", ":", "JJS", "NN", "NN"]]
anyone says even thinks air travel today superior meaningful way air travel regulation direct knowledge regulated air travel. air travel today equivalent bus travel sixties. remember well. thing free market industry -- least airline industry
["air", "travel"]
air travel
1
1
Glenn
Anyone who says or even thinks that air travel today is superior in any meaningful way to air travel before regulation has no direct knowledge of regulated air travel. - I do. Air travel today is equivalent to bus travel in the sixties. I remember that as well. There is no such thing as a free market in any industry -- least of all the airline industry.
government
A1876-P
regulation
0
3
15,079
18,683,641
[["anyone", "says", "even", "thinks", "air", "travel", "today", "superior", "meaningful", "way", "air", "travel", "regulation", "direct", "knowledge", "regulated", "air", "travel"], ["air", "travel", "today", "equivalent", "bus", "travel", "sixties"], ["remember", "well"], ["thing", "free", "market", "industry", "--", "least", "airline", "industry"]]
[["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", ":", "JJS", "NN", "NN"]]
anyone says even thinks air travel today superior meaningful way air travel regulation direct knowledge regulated air travel. air travel today equivalent bus travel sixties. remember well. thing free market industry -- least airline industry
["regulation"]
regulation
1
1
Glenn
Anyone who says or even thinks that air travel today is superior in any meaningful way to air travel before regulation has no direct knowledge of regulated air travel. - I do. Air travel today is equivalent to bus travel in the sixties. I remember that as well. There is no such thing as a free market in any industry -- least of all the airline industry.
airline industry
A1877-P
airline industry
0
1
15,088
18,683,641
[["anyone", "says", "even", "thinks", "air", "travel", "today", "superior", "meaningful", "way", "air", "travel", "regulation", "direct", "knowledge", "regulated", "air", "travel"], ["air", "travel", "today", "equivalent", "bus", "travel", "sixties"], ["remember", "well"], ["thing", "free", "market", "industry", "--", "least", "airline", "industry"]]
[["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", ":", "JJS", "NN", "NN"]]
anyone says even thinks air travel today superior meaningful way air travel regulation direct knowledge regulated air travel. air travel today equivalent bus travel sixties. remember well. thing free market industry -- least airline industry
["airline", "industry"]
airline industry
1
1
Glenn
Anyone who says or even thinks that air travel today is superior in any meaningful way to air travel before regulation has no direct knowledge of regulated air travel. - I do. Air travel today is equivalent to bus travel in the sixties. I remember that as well. There is no such thing as a free market in any industry -- least of all the airline industry.
airline industry
A1877-P
travel
0
3
15,089
18,683,641
[["anyone", "says", "even", "thinks", "air", "travel", "today", "superior", "meaningful", "way", "air", "travel", "regulation", "direct", "knowledge", "regulated", "air", "travel"], ["air", "travel", "today", "equivalent", "bus", "travel", "sixties"], ["remember", "well"], ["thing", "free", "market", "industry", "--", "least", "airline", "industry"]]
[["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", ":", "JJS", "NN", "NN"]]
anyone says even thinks air travel today superior meaningful way air travel regulation direct knowledge regulated air travel. air travel today equivalent bus travel sixties. remember well. thing free market industry -- least airline industry
["travel"]
travel
1
1
Glenn
Anyone who says or even thinks that air travel today is superior in any meaningful way to air travel before regulation has no direct knowledge of regulated air travel. - I do. Air travel today is equivalent to bus travel in the sixties. I remember that as well. There is no such thing as a free market in any industry -- least of all the airline industry.
airline industry
A1877-P
air travel
1
3
15,090
18,683,641
[["anyone", "says", "even", "thinks", "air", "travel", "today", "superior", "meaningful", "way", "air", "travel", "regulation", "direct", "knowledge", "regulated", "air", "travel"], ["air", "travel", "today", "equivalent", "bus", "travel", "sixties"], ["remember", "well"], ["thing", "free", "market", "industry", "--", "least", "airline", "industry"]]
[["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", ":", "JJS", "NN", "NN"]]
anyone says even thinks air travel today superior meaningful way air travel regulation direct knowledge regulated air travel. air travel today equivalent bus travel sixties. remember well. thing free market industry -- least airline industry
["air", "travel"]
air travel
1
1
Glenn
Anyone who says or even thinks that air travel today is superior in any meaningful way to air travel before regulation has no direct knowledge of regulated air travel. - I do. Air travel today is equivalent to bus travel in the sixties. I remember that as well. There is no such thing as a free market in any industry -- least of all the airline industry.
airline industry
A1877-P
regulated air travel in the current age.
0
2
15,091
18,683,641
[["anyone", "says", "even", "thinks", "air", "travel", "today", "superior", "meaningful", "way", "air", "travel", "regulation", "direct", "knowledge", "regulated", "air", "travel"], ["air", "travel", "today", "equivalent", "bus", "travel", "sixties"], ["remember", "well"], ["thing", "free", "market", "industry", "--", "least", "airline", "industry"]]
[["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", ":", "JJS", "NN", "NN"]]
anyone says even thinks air travel today superior meaningful way air travel regulation direct knowledge regulated air travel. air travel today equivalent bus travel sixties. remember well. thing free market industry -- least airline industry
["regulated", "air", "travel", "current", "age"]
regulated air travel current age
1
0
Glenn
Anyone who says or even thinks that air travel today is superior in any meaningful way to air travel before regulation has no direct knowledge of regulated air travel. - I do. Air travel today is equivalent to bus travel in the sixties. I remember that as well. There is no such thing as a free market in any industry -- least of all the airline industry.
airline industry
A1877-P
regulated air travel
0
3
15,092
18,683,641
[["anyone", "says", "even", "thinks", "air", "travel", "today", "superior", "meaningful", "way", "air", "travel", "regulation", "direct", "knowledge", "regulated", "air", "travel"], ["air", "travel", "today", "equivalent", "bus", "travel", "sixties"], ["remember", "well"], ["thing", "free", "market", "industry", "--", "least", "airline", "industry"]]
[["NN", "VBZ", "RB", "VBZ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", "NNS"], ["VBP", "RB"], ["NN", "JJ", "NN", "NN", ":", "JJS", "NN", "NN"]]
anyone says even thinks air travel today superior meaningful way air travel regulation direct knowledge regulated air travel. air travel today equivalent bus travel sixties. remember well. thing free market industry -- least airline industry
["regulated", "air", "travel"]
regulated air travel
1
1
Bruce Higgins
This much I have learned: Most people are good. Most people want to do a good job if they are allowed. Life is about balance and not everyone's balance is the same. Having said that it is important to have a job that is rewarding and to have rewarding time away from work. If you hire good people and treat them like good people you will need fewer rules. The fewer rules, the more nimble the company. Nimble companies tend to survive and prosper. Large behemoths, merely survive, until entropy takes over.
workers
A2156-P
workers
1
1
2,006
16,029,436
[["much", "learned", "people", "good"], ["people", "want", "good", "job", "allowed"], ["life", "balance", "everyone", "'s", "balance"], ["said", "important", "job", "rewarding", "rewarding", "time", "away", "work"], ["hire", "good", "people", "treat", "like", "good", "people", "need", "fewer", "rules"], ["fewer", "rules", "nimble", "company"], ["nimble", "companies", "tend", "survive", "prosper"], ["large", "behemoths", "merely", "survive", "entropy", "takes"]]
[["JJ", "VBN", "NNS", "JJ"], ["NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "NN"], ["VBD", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "NN"], ["VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "IN", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "JJR", "NNS"], ["JJR", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VB"], ["JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "VBZ"]]
much learned people good. people want good job allowed. life balance everyone 's balance. said important job rewarding rewarding time away work. hire good people treat like good people need fewer rules. fewer rules nimble company. nimble companies tend survive prosper. large behemoths merely survive entropy takes
["worker"]
worker
1
0
Bruce Higgins
This much I have learned: Most people are good. Most people want to do a good job if they are allowed. Life is about balance and not everyone's balance is the same. Having said that it is important to have a job that is rewarding and to have rewarding time away from work. If you hire good people and treat them like good people you will need fewer rules. The fewer rules, the more nimble the company. Nimble companies tend to survive and prosper. Large behemoths, merely survive, until entropy takes over.
workers
A2156-P
intrinsic good
1
3
2,007
16,029,436
[["much", "learned", "people", "good"], ["people", "want", "good", "job", "allowed"], ["life", "balance", "everyone", "'s", "balance"], ["said", "important", "job", "rewarding", "rewarding", "time", "away", "work"], ["hire", "good", "people", "treat", "like", "good", "people", "need", "fewer", "rules"], ["fewer", "rules", "nimble", "company"], ["nimble", "companies", "tend", "survive", "prosper"], ["large", "behemoths", "merely", "survive", "entropy", "takes"]]
[["JJ", "VBN", "NNS", "JJ"], ["NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "NN"], ["VBD", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "NN"], ["VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "IN", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "JJR", "NNS"], ["JJR", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VB"], ["JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "VBZ"]]
much learned people good. people want good job allowed. life balance everyone 's balance. said important job rewarding rewarding time away work. hire good people treat like good people need fewer rules. fewer rules nimble company. nimble companies tend survive prosper. large behemoths merely survive entropy takes
["intrinsic", "good"]
intrinsic good
1
0
Bruce Higgins
This much I have learned: Most people are good. Most people want to do a good job if they are allowed. Life is about balance and not everyone's balance is the same. Having said that it is important to have a job that is rewarding and to have rewarding time away from work. If you hire good people and treat them like good people you will need fewer rules. The fewer rules, the more nimble the company. Nimble companies tend to survive and prosper. Large behemoths, merely survive, until entropy takes over.
workers
A2156-P
balance
1
2
2,008
16,029,436
[["much", "learned", "people", "good"], ["people", "want", "good", "job", "allowed"], ["life", "balance", "everyone", "'s", "balance"], ["said", "important", "job", "rewarding", "rewarding", "time", "away", "work"], ["hire", "good", "people", "treat", "like", "good", "people", "need", "fewer", "rules"], ["fewer", "rules", "nimble", "company"], ["nimble", "companies", "tend", "survive", "prosper"], ["large", "behemoths", "merely", "survive", "entropy", "takes"]]
[["JJ", "VBN", "NNS", "JJ"], ["NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "NN"], ["VBD", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "NN"], ["VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "IN", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "JJR", "NNS"], ["JJR", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VB"], ["JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "VBZ"]]
much learned people good. people want good job allowed. life balance everyone 's balance. said important job rewarding rewarding time away work. hire good people treat like good people need fewer rules. fewer rules nimble company. nimble companies tend survive prosper. large behemoths merely survive entropy takes
["balance"]
balance
1
1
Bruce Higgins
This much I have learned: Most people are good. Most people want to do a good job if they are allowed. Life is about balance and not everyone's balance is the same. Having said that it is important to have a job that is rewarding and to have rewarding time away from work. If you hire good people and treat them like good people you will need fewer rules. The fewer rules, the more nimble the company. Nimble companies tend to survive and prosper. Large behemoths, merely survive, until entropy takes over.
workers
A2156-P
people
1
3
2,009
16,029,436
[["much", "learned", "people", "good"], ["people", "want", "good", "job", "allowed"], ["life", "balance", "everyone", "'s", "balance"], ["said", "important", "job", "rewarding", "rewarding", "time", "away", "work"], ["hire", "good", "people", "treat", "like", "good", "people", "need", "fewer", "rules"], ["fewer", "rules", "nimble", "company"], ["nimble", "companies", "tend", "survive", "prosper"], ["large", "behemoths", "merely", "survive", "entropy", "takes"]]
[["JJ", "VBN", "NNS", "JJ"], ["NNS", "VBP", "JJ", "NN", "VBN"], ["NN", "NN", "NN", "POS", "NN"], ["VBD", "JJ", "NN", "JJ", "JJ", "NN", "RB", "NN"], ["VBP", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "IN", "JJ", "NNS", "VB", "JJR", "NNS"], ["JJR", "NNS", "JJ", "NN"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBP", "VB", "VB"], ["JJ", "NNS", "RB", "VBP", "NN", "VBZ"]]
much learned people good. people want good job allowed. life balance everyone 's balance. said important job rewarding rewarding time away work. hire good people treat like good people need fewer rules. fewer rules nimble company. nimble companies tend survive prosper. large behemoths merely survive entropy takes
["people"]
people
1
1
Caron
What I would like to see is the responsibility for raising children to be the PARENT"S job once again. It is not the government's job to raise our children. If that includes schooling at home, then so be it. As our newly elected NY governor reminded us just today, NY State has the highest spending per pupil in the schools, yet is 34th in the rankings for quality of education. The NY State Dept of Education is way overdue for reform. Maybe a tax credit would be the kick in the pants that NY State school administrators need. I would homeschool but I need to work to pay my school taxes which have quadrupled in the past six years. Social skills learned in school? Seems like I spend every waking moment trying to undo the social skills my daughter is "learning" during school hours!
home schoolers
A5125-P
home schoolers
1
1
5,254
3,176,204
[["would", "like", "see", "responsibility", "raising", "children", "parent\"s", "job"], ["government", "'s", "job", "raise", "children"], ["includes", "schooling", "home"], ["newly", "elected", "ny", "governor", "reminded", "us", "today", "ny", "state", "highest", "spending", "per", "pupil", "schools", "yet", "34th", "rankings", "quality", "education"], ["ny", "state", "dept", "education", "way", "overdue", "reform"], ["maybe", "tax", "credit", "would", "kick", "pants", "ny", "state", "school", "administrators", "need"], ["would", "homeschool", "need", "work", "pay", "school", "taxes", "quadrupled", "past", "six", "years"], ["social", "skills", "learned", "school"], ["seems", "like", "spend", "every", "waking", "moment", "trying", "undo", "social", "skills", "daughter", "learning", "school", "hours"]]
[["MD", "VB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNPS", "NN"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NN"], ["RB", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "VBD", "PRP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "JJS", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "CC", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "CD", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "NN"], ["VBZ", "IN", "VBP", "DT", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"]]
would like see responsibility raising children parent"s job. government 's job raise children. includes schooling home. newly elected ny governor reminded us today ny state highest spending per pupil schools yet 34th rankings quality education. ny state dept education way overdue reform. maybe tax credit would kick pants ny state school administrators need. would homeschool need work pay school taxes quadrupled past six years. social skills learned school. seems like spend every waking moment trying undo social skills daughter learning school hours
["home", "schoolers"]
home schoolers
1
0
Caron
What I would like to see is the responsibility for raising children to be the PARENT"S job once again. It is not the government's job to raise our children. If that includes schooling at home, then so be it. As our newly elected NY governor reminded us just today, NY State has the highest spending per pupil in the schools, yet is 34th in the rankings for quality of education. The NY State Dept of Education is way overdue for reform. Maybe a tax credit would be the kick in the pants that NY State school administrators need. I would homeschool but I need to work to pay my school taxes which have quadrupled in the past six years. Social skills learned in school? Seems like I spend every waking moment trying to undo the social skills my daughter is "learning" during school hours!
home schoolers
A5125-P
parent
1
3
5,255
3,176,204
[["would", "like", "see", "responsibility", "raising", "children", "parent\"s", "job"], ["government", "'s", "job", "raise", "children"], ["includes", "schooling", "home"], ["newly", "elected", "ny", "governor", "reminded", "us", "today", "ny", "state", "highest", "spending", "per", "pupil", "schools", "yet", "34th", "rankings", "quality", "education"], ["ny", "state", "dept", "education", "way", "overdue", "reform"], ["maybe", "tax", "credit", "would", "kick", "pants", "ny", "state", "school", "administrators", "need"], ["would", "homeschool", "need", "work", "pay", "school", "taxes", "quadrupled", "past", "six", "years"], ["social", "skills", "learned", "school"], ["seems", "like", "spend", "every", "waking", "moment", "trying", "undo", "social", "skills", "daughter", "learning", "school", "hours"]]
[["MD", "VB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNPS", "NN"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NN"], ["RB", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "VBD", "PRP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "JJS", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "CC", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "CD", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "NN"], ["VBZ", "IN", "VBP", "DT", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"]]
would like see responsibility raising children parent"s job. government 's job raise children. includes schooling home. newly elected ny governor reminded us today ny state highest spending per pupil schools yet 34th rankings quality education. ny state dept education way overdue reform. maybe tax credit would kick pants ny state school administrators need. would homeschool need work pay school taxes quadrupled past six years. social skills learned school. seems like spend every waking moment trying undo social skills daughter learning school hours
["parent"]
parent
1
1
Caron
What I would like to see is the responsibility for raising children to be the PARENT"S job once again. It is not the government's job to raise our children. If that includes schooling at home, then so be it. As our newly elected NY governor reminded us just today, NY State has the highest spending per pupil in the schools, yet is 34th in the rankings for quality of education. The NY State Dept of Education is way overdue for reform. Maybe a tax credit would be the kick in the pants that NY State school administrators need. I would homeschool but I need to work to pay my school taxes which have quadrupled in the past six years. Social skills learned in school? Seems like I spend every waking moment trying to undo the social skills my daughter is "learning" during school hours!
home schoolers
A5125-P
quality education
1
3
5,256
3,176,204
[["would", "like", "see", "responsibility", "raising", "children", "parent\"s", "job"], ["government", "'s", "job", "raise", "children"], ["includes", "schooling", "home"], ["newly", "elected", "ny", "governor", "reminded", "us", "today", "ny", "state", "highest", "spending", "per", "pupil", "schools", "yet", "34th", "rankings", "quality", "education"], ["ny", "state", "dept", "education", "way", "overdue", "reform"], ["maybe", "tax", "credit", "would", "kick", "pants", "ny", "state", "school", "administrators", "need"], ["would", "homeschool", "need", "work", "pay", "school", "taxes", "quadrupled", "past", "six", "years"], ["social", "skills", "learned", "school"], ["seems", "like", "spend", "every", "waking", "moment", "trying", "undo", "social", "skills", "daughter", "learning", "school", "hours"]]
[["MD", "VB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNPS", "NN"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NN"], ["RB", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "VBD", "PRP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "JJS", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "CC", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "CD", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "NN"], ["VBZ", "IN", "VBP", "DT", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"]]
would like see responsibility raising children parent"s job. government 's job raise children. includes schooling home. newly elected ny governor reminded us today ny state highest spending per pupil schools yet 34th rankings quality education. ny state dept education way overdue reform. maybe tax credit would kick pants ny state school administrators need. would homeschool need work pay school taxes quadrupled past six years. social skills learned school. seems like spend every waking moment trying undo social skills daughter learning school hours
["quality", "education"]
quality education
1
1
Caron
What I would like to see is the responsibility for raising children to be the PARENT"S job once again. It is not the government's job to raise our children. If that includes schooling at home, then so be it. As our newly elected NY governor reminded us just today, NY State has the highest spending per pupil in the schools, yet is 34th in the rankings for quality of education. The NY State Dept of Education is way overdue for reform. Maybe a tax credit would be the kick in the pants that NY State school administrators need. I would homeschool but I need to work to pay my school taxes which have quadrupled in the past six years. Social skills learned in school? Seems like I spend every waking moment trying to undo the social skills my daughter is "learning" during school hours!
home schoolers
A5125-P
child
1
3
5,257
3,176,204
[["would", "like", "see", "responsibility", "raising", "children", "parent\"s", "job"], ["government", "'s", "job", "raise", "children"], ["includes", "schooling", "home"], ["newly", "elected", "ny", "governor", "reminded", "us", "today", "ny", "state", "highest", "spending", "per", "pupil", "schools", "yet", "34th", "rankings", "quality", "education"], ["ny", "state", "dept", "education", "way", "overdue", "reform"], ["maybe", "tax", "credit", "would", "kick", "pants", "ny", "state", "school", "administrators", "need"], ["would", "homeschool", "need", "work", "pay", "school", "taxes", "quadrupled", "past", "six", "years"], ["social", "skills", "learned", "school"], ["seems", "like", "spend", "every", "waking", "moment", "trying", "undo", "social", "skills", "daughter", "learning", "school", "hours"]]
[["MD", "VB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNPS", "NN"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NN"], ["RB", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "VBD", "PRP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "JJS", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "CC", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "CD", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "NN"], ["VBZ", "IN", "VBP", "DT", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"]]
would like see responsibility raising children parent"s job. government 's job raise children. includes schooling home. newly elected ny governor reminded us today ny state highest spending per pupil schools yet 34th rankings quality education. ny state dept education way overdue reform. maybe tax credit would kick pants ny state school administrators need. would homeschool need work pay school taxes quadrupled past six years. social skills learned school. seems like spend every waking moment trying undo social skills daughter learning school hours
["child"]
child
1
1
Caron
What I would like to see is the responsibility for raising children to be the PARENT"S job once again. It is not the government's job to raise our children. If that includes schooling at home, then so be it. As our newly elected NY governor reminded us just today, NY State has the highest spending per pupil in the schools, yet is 34th in the rankings for quality of education. The NY State Dept of Education is way overdue for reform. Maybe a tax credit would be the kick in the pants that NY State school administrators need. I would homeschool but I need to work to pay my school taxes which have quadrupled in the past six years. Social skills learned in school? Seems like I spend every waking moment trying to undo the social skills my daughter is "learning" during school hours!
a tax break
A5126-P
a tax break
0
1
15,056
3,176,204
[["would", "like", "see", "responsibility", "raising", "children", "parent\"s", "job"], ["government", "'s", "job", "raise", "children"], ["includes", "schooling", "home"], ["newly", "elected", "ny", "governor", "reminded", "us", "today", "ny", "state", "highest", "spending", "per", "pupil", "schools", "yet", "34th", "rankings", "quality", "education"], ["ny", "state", "dept", "education", "way", "overdue", "reform"], ["maybe", "tax", "credit", "would", "kick", "pants", "ny", "state", "school", "administrators", "need"], ["would", "homeschool", "need", "work", "pay", "school", "taxes", "quadrupled", "past", "six", "years"], ["social", "skills", "learned", "school"], ["seems", "like", "spend", "every", "waking", "moment", "trying", "undo", "social", "skills", "daughter", "learning", "school", "hours"]]
[["MD", "VB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNPS", "NN"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NN"], ["RB", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "VBD", "PRP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "JJS", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "CC", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "CD", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "NN"], ["VBZ", "IN", "VBP", "DT", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"]]
would like see responsibility raising children parent"s job. government 's job raise children. includes schooling home. newly elected ny governor reminded us today ny state highest spending per pupil schools yet 34th rankings quality education. ny state dept education way overdue reform. maybe tax credit would kick pants ny state school administrators need. would homeschool need work pay school taxes quadrupled past six years. social skills learned school. seems like spend every waking moment trying undo social skills daughter learning school hours
["tax", "break"]
tax break
1
0
Caron
What I would like to see is the responsibility for raising children to be the PARENT"S job once again. It is not the government's job to raise our children. If that includes schooling at home, then so be it. As our newly elected NY governor reminded us just today, NY State has the highest spending per pupil in the schools, yet is 34th in the rankings for quality of education. The NY State Dept of Education is way overdue for reform. Maybe a tax credit would be the kick in the pants that NY State school administrators need. I would homeschool but I need to work to pay my school taxes which have quadrupled in the past six years. Social skills learned in school? Seems like I spend every waking moment trying to undo the social skills my daughter is "learning" during school hours!
a tax break
A5126-P
raising children
0
3
15,057
3,176,204
[["would", "like", "see", "responsibility", "raising", "children", "parent\"s", "job"], ["government", "'s", "job", "raise", "children"], ["includes", "schooling", "home"], ["newly", "elected", "ny", "governor", "reminded", "us", "today", "ny", "state", "highest", "spending", "per", "pupil", "schools", "yet", "34th", "rankings", "quality", "education"], ["ny", "state", "dept", "education", "way", "overdue", "reform"], ["maybe", "tax", "credit", "would", "kick", "pants", "ny", "state", "school", "administrators", "need"], ["would", "homeschool", "need", "work", "pay", "school", "taxes", "quadrupled", "past", "six", "years"], ["social", "skills", "learned", "school"], ["seems", "like", "spend", "every", "waking", "moment", "trying", "undo", "social", "skills", "daughter", "learning", "school", "hours"]]
[["MD", "VB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNPS", "NN"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NN"], ["RB", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "VBD", "PRP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "JJS", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "CC", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "CD", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "NN"], ["VBZ", "IN", "VBP", "DT", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"]]
would like see responsibility raising children parent"s job. government 's job raise children. includes schooling home. newly elected ny governor reminded us today ny state highest spending per pupil schools yet 34th rankings quality education. ny state dept education way overdue reform. maybe tax credit would kick pants ny state school administrators need. would homeschool need work pay school taxes quadrupled past six years. social skills learned school. seems like spend every waking moment trying undo social skills daughter learning school hours
["raising", "child"]
raising child
1
1
Caron
What I would like to see is the responsibility for raising children to be the PARENT"S job once again. It is not the government's job to raise our children. If that includes schooling at home, then so be it. As our newly elected NY governor reminded us just today, NY State has the highest spending per pupil in the schools, yet is 34th in the rankings for quality of education. The NY State Dept of Education is way overdue for reform. Maybe a tax credit would be the kick in the pants that NY State school administrators need. I would homeschool but I need to work to pay my school taxes which have quadrupled in the past six years. Social skills learned in school? Seems like I spend every waking moment trying to undo the social skills my daughter is "learning" during school hours!
a tax break
A5126-P
schooling at home
1
2
15,058
3,176,204
[["would", "like", "see", "responsibility", "raising", "children", "parent\"s", "job"], ["government", "'s", "job", "raise", "children"], ["includes", "schooling", "home"], ["newly", "elected", "ny", "governor", "reminded", "us", "today", "ny", "state", "highest", "spending", "per", "pupil", "schools", "yet", "34th", "rankings", "quality", "education"], ["ny", "state", "dept", "education", "way", "overdue", "reform"], ["maybe", "tax", "credit", "would", "kick", "pants", "ny", "state", "school", "administrators", "need"], ["would", "homeschool", "need", "work", "pay", "school", "taxes", "quadrupled", "past", "six", "years"], ["social", "skills", "learned", "school"], ["seems", "like", "spend", "every", "waking", "moment", "trying", "undo", "social", "skills", "daughter", "learning", "school", "hours"]]
[["MD", "VB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNPS", "NN"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NN"], ["RB", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "VBD", "PRP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "JJS", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "CC", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "CD", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "NN"], ["VBZ", "IN", "VBP", "DT", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"]]
would like see responsibility raising children parent"s job. government 's job raise children. includes schooling home. newly elected ny governor reminded us today ny state highest spending per pupil schools yet 34th rankings quality education. ny state dept education way overdue reform. maybe tax credit would kick pants ny state school administrators need. would homeschool need work pay school taxes quadrupled past six years. social skills learned school. seems like spend every waking moment trying undo social skills daughter learning school hours
["schooling", "home"]
schooling home
1
1
Caron
What I would like to see is the responsibility for raising children to be the PARENT"S job once again. It is not the government's job to raise our children. If that includes schooling at home, then so be it. As our newly elected NY governor reminded us just today, NY State has the highest spending per pupil in the schools, yet is 34th in the rankings for quality of education. The NY State Dept of Education is way overdue for reform. Maybe a tax credit would be the kick in the pants that NY State school administrators need. I would homeschool but I need to work to pay my school taxes which have quadrupled in the past six years. Social skills learned in school? Seems like I spend every waking moment trying to undo the social skills my daughter is "learning" during school hours!
a tax break
A5126-P
parent
1
3
15,059
3,176,204
[["would", "like", "see", "responsibility", "raising", "children", "parent\"s", "job"], ["government", "'s", "job", "raise", "children"], ["includes", "schooling", "home"], ["newly", "elected", "ny", "governor", "reminded", "us", "today", "ny", "state", "highest", "spending", "per", "pupil", "schools", "yet", "34th", "rankings", "quality", "education"], ["ny", "state", "dept", "education", "way", "overdue", "reform"], ["maybe", "tax", "credit", "would", "kick", "pants", "ny", "state", "school", "administrators", "need"], ["would", "homeschool", "need", "work", "pay", "school", "taxes", "quadrupled", "past", "six", "years"], ["social", "skills", "learned", "school"], ["seems", "like", "spend", "every", "waking", "moment", "trying", "undo", "social", "skills", "daughter", "learning", "school", "hours"]]
[["MD", "VB", "VB", "NN", "VBG", "NNS", "NNPS", "NN"], ["NN", "POS", "NN", "VB", "NNS"], ["VBZ", "VBG", "NN"], ["RB", "VBN", "NNP", "NN", "VBD", "PRP", "NN", "NNP", "NNP", "JJS", "NN", "IN", "NN", "NNS", "CC", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "NN"], ["NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "NNP", "RB", "JJ", "NN"], ["RB", "NN", "NN", "MD", "NN", "NNS", "NNP", "NNP", "NN", "NNS", "VBP"], ["MD", "VB", "VBP", "VB", "VB", "NN", "NNS", "VBN", "JJ", "CD", "NNS"], ["JJ", "NNS", "VBD", "NN"], ["VBZ", "IN", "VBP", "DT", "NN", "NN", "VBG", "VB", "JJ", "NNS", "NN", "VBG", "NN", "NNS"]]
would like see responsibility raising children parent"s job. government 's job raise children. includes schooling home. newly elected ny governor reminded us today ny state highest spending per pupil schools yet 34th rankings quality education. ny state dept education way overdue reform. maybe tax credit would kick pants ny state school administrators need. would homeschool need work pay school taxes quadrupled past six years. social skills learned school. seems like spend every waking moment trying undo social skills daughter learning school hours
["parent"]
parent
1
1